I Always thought that every runway should have 500 mt of sand/small gravel like in Formula1 tracks but I dont understand whay there is a wall it's insane, they could be saved all
I think they landed the wrong way on the runway due to the emergency, and they hit the blast wall that’s supposed to be used for take off. Just my guess
@@Bulldog23636 Yes you're right I see this later on other videos, in any case the concrete antenna basement was largely criticized, even if the plane was the wrong way: Some airplane in emergency could also hit it in the right direction if it's short on landing for some failure.
Now we have all seen in two recent crashes, the one in Azerbaijan and the one here, being seated at the back of the plane increases your chances of survival. Always sit at the back of a public mode of transportation. Bus, train or plane.
The 2 flight attendants at the back near the tail were the only ones who survived. So even if you sat at the very back of that Jeju plane, you may have still perished unfortunately.
In light of the tragic Jeju Air plane crash, my deepest condolences go out to the families and friends of the victims. This devastating event has taken so many lives, and my heart aches for those who are mourning the loss of their loved ones. May you find strength and comfort in each other during this incredibly difficult time. My thoughts and prayers are with you all.
Why is the reporter speaking like an amateur, where he keeps repeating "you know" several times and is so exasperated that he is unable to fluently describe the incident.
fluently to describe please. If you're going to criticise someone else's English please make sure your own is correct. I am Scottish so speak British English.
I agree, he was too focused on trying to put a sentence together instead of giving some information about the grave tragedy that has happened.. so irritating
My heart goes out to all victims who died untimely. And the little kids - OMG. Airlines know about bird strikes, then why don’t they make planes such a way where birds cannot strike the engines? Pilots couldn’t control the plane? Who is at fault? The engineers? The company is for sure. RIP
Besides no gear, it also looks like no flaps or slats. Indicating a possible loss of hydraulics and thus a higher landing speed and then the extended gear up slide out.
Because standard airliner engines need to take in air, in very large amounts so it needs to be exposed and hence cannot be...shielded, for instance. To get a rough idea for the layman, ever seen depictions of what happens when you stand in front of a running aircraft engine? Yeah, that much air. Now if a bird goes near the engine, which they tend to do to avoid the main fuselage (and for whatever reason they decide to approach a fast moving massive vehicle i'll never know, maybe to perch on the wings of the aircraft or something), they get sucked in. And keep in mind mid-flight the engine is operating far more intensely than on the ground. So lots of kinetic energy being seeped through the engine there. Lots of damage done to the internals. Engine blades are usually designed with efficiency (aerodynamics/cost) in mind, not durability - to a certain extent. You have to understand that materials that can withstand that amount of force don't usually spin for a rotor very well. That said, engines are rigorously tested, even with bird strike tests where they launch fake birds at the engine. Generally speaking, only engines that pass the safety margin make it out onto market. Even with only a 0.00005% chance of things going wrong, it is still a chance that something goes wrong. Which is why, whilst there are hundreds or thousands of flights daily, the chances of things like this happening is very, very low. That being said, it is not absolute. Accidents will happen, and can go very badly as it did in this case when they do. Finally, we are not actually sure this accident was caused by the engine. There were mentions of landing gear malfunction, or a bird stuck in the wings (structural damage?). Will wait for more info.
Lockerbie was worse. Blew up in the air over Lockerbie and some of the houses on the ground were hit as well. Pan Am Flight 103, 270 killed, 11 of them on the ground. 21st December 1988. All of Scotland was in mourning that. night.
When you are a pilot, yes you were trained to land on hardened ground including concrete those training is because your gears were functioning properly, but then if not you will have a better chance (if your landing gear doesn’t work) in soft grassy ground surfaces because it creates less friction, less friction less heat lesser chances of aviation fuel to expand and explode! And the soft surface on the sides of the concrete tarmac will helps as opposing force to slow down the plane, probably rock it side by side and eventually lose both wings and lessen the chance of the engines burn and explode. We cannot blame the pilots, this wasn’t probably in their training manual. But the mathematical probability at belly up landing without gears it is much higher chance of survival to land in soft surface than hard concrete. RIP TO THOSE PEOPLE WHO PERISHED IN THAT ACCIDENT.
There are thousands of flights daily and how many crashes do you hear like this? Very few. It is statistically one of the safest modes of transport (far, far safer than driving for example)
South Korea ever boasts.. But this time.. No one predicted whatever happens next movement.. I think this is a lesson to them.. That they never humiliate and mis estimate another country....
An after-thought: Could aircraft manufacturers not construct Titanium mesh grilles to fit over the front of jet engine intakes to reduce the debris from bird-strikes entering the compression chamber and damaging the turbines?
Thank you so much for this amazing video! Just a quick off-topic question: I have a SafePal wallet with USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). How can I transfer them to Binance?
No they can't use the speed breaks cause if they deployed it then..the spoilers wouldnt deploy at the same time..hence the drag initially caused wouldn't be equal which would cause the plane to veer of the runway They couldn't use the reverse thrust for the same reason but..in this case the reverse thrust on engine 2 was deployed but the reverse thrust on engine 1 wasn't which is highly unusual So it would be best to wait for official report
Don't blame Boeing this time around.... it looks like there was fire coming from one of the Engines....Boeing has since improved the Engineering issues it was experiencing...and the Wallstreet $$$ focused CEO was fired!
Aliens in Drones from New Jersey shot the plane down with anti gravity laser beams.Did I miss any hairbrained concepts? please let me know.Thanks and have a nice day.
Why pilot decided to land with faulty landing gears on smooth runway. This is common failure and there must be better procedures like landing on water or field.
The engine mounts are design to break away under certain sever stress. But a water landing with under slung engines will most likely result in the aircraft "digging in" to the water and the instant high G forces encountered will likely be un-survivable. If anyone survives, they have to be able to extricate and exit the aircraft, and either be able to deploy life vest, and/or make it to a raft, if a raft is available, then endure/survive possible hypothermia. This is regular people with not training or skills to apply in this situation, and military aviators having gone through rigorous training, and expecting search and rescue assets ready and able to assist, still have a rough chance of surviving. The second issue of "field" is the better than ditching (water landing), but if one engine shears and the other does not, a "cartwheeling" event will be very low survivable for anyone, as well as no one/equipment to respond in a timely manner to deal with post impact fire, or trauma when minutes count for survival. Landing at an airfield really is the best option, and the aircraft did decelerate and bled off a tremendous amount of energy (speed). Unfortunatly, the wall was the greatest thing that eliminated a better outcome and survival of those on board. Does the possibility of every airport encountering such a scenario as this event, justify the creation of sufficient overrun for every runway? Perhaps. But that cost will be passed on to the person buying passage. And, like it or not, we live in a "cost/benefit", real or imagined, culture. And every one of are at our core, bean counters. If I had a nickel for every person that said, "I don't care the cost, make it happen, and then proclaims someone is taking them for a ride", I would have too much money needing a way to be spent to be replying to people I may never meet that exist in the innerwebs. But, I do hope any who read this, that you never encounter such a flight as all, but the two poor survivors, and one a Flight Attendant who sill certainly have a lot of guilt going forward. At least it was quick for the rest. That is a bittersweet thing. Hug those you love, love on your cats, dogs, turtles, etc., and tell your friends how much they mean to you, every chance you get.
Only two people live it is crazy Feeling like they must be Main character One plane crash no one survive in one plane crash 2 survive Nowadays people will scare sitting on a plane too many accidents are happening what is going on🙄
I Always thought that every runway should have 500 mt of sand/small gravel like in Formula1 tracks but I dont understand whay there is a wall it's insane, they could be saved all
Many do, it would not have made any diffeerence. By the way, nobody cares what you think.
@@prophetsnake less than nobody cares what you think.
I think they landed the wrong way on the runway due to the emergency, and they hit the blast wall that’s supposed to be used for take off. Just my guess
@@Bulldog23636why do you need a wall for take off?
@@Bulldog23636 Yes you're right I see this later on other videos, in any case the concrete antenna basement was largely criticized, even if the plane was the wrong way: Some airplane in emergency could also hit it in the right direction if it's short on landing for some failure.
RIP "If it's a Boeing I'm not going" is a quote i read that is life saving advice.
I've always stuck to this ever since air crash investigation convinced me that boeings had design flaws.
Nothing to do with manufacturer or type, luser boi.
Has nothing to do with the type of aircraft, fjukkwit.
@giftofthewild6665 Yeah, I'm sure th eaviation industry is crushed.
A 737-max
Now we have all seen in two recent crashes, the one in Azerbaijan and the one here, being seated at the back of the plane increases your chances of survival. Always sit at the back of a public mode of transportation. Bus, train or plane.
So if everyone tries to sit in the back then?😆
The 2 flight attendants at the back near the tail were the only ones who survived. So even if you sat at the very back of that Jeju plane, you may have still perished unfortunately.
Sincere condolences to all the victims from Germany.
How could you remember anything if you are lucky to survive a collision like that , RIP to all the passengers who past away 🙏🙏
In light of the tragic Jeju Air plane crash, my deepest condolences go out to the families and friends of the victims. This devastating event has taken so many lives, and my heart aches for those who are mourning the loss of their loved ones. May you find strength and comfort in each other during this incredibly difficult time. My thoughts and prayers are with you all.
Condolences to the people of south Korea 🇬🇧 😢
Did the two people miraculously surviving make anyone else think of UNBREAKABLE?
No, onl;y lusers who think comic books are real.
Unfortunately, it may be a very difficult thing for them each to cope with emotionally. What a horrible start to 2025.
They were flight stewardess that were sitting on the tail that broke away when it hit the ground not crashing into wall
The survivor male has basically a broken vertebrae and in ICU monitored by top neurosurgeon, so no…not unbreakable.
Why is the reporter speaking like an amateur, where he keeps repeating "you know" several times and is so exasperated that he is unable to fluently describe the incident.
He's speaking a second language, how many languages do you speak?
fluently to describe please. If you're going to criticise someone else's English please make sure your own is correct. I am Scottish so speak British English.
I agree, he was too focused on trying to put a sentence together instead of giving some information about the grave tragedy that has happened.. so irritating
@giftofthewild6665speaking a second language doesn’t excuse one from being completely incompetent at it.
Just so you know!
They should blame the airport authorities for building that concrete wall, but not the pilots.
Why? Every airport has them.
two huge air disasters in just one month
In just a week.
one shot down by id..ots
one brought down by thieving id..ots taking money from maintenance
"you know, you know you know.."
yes.... irritating
Yeah, I'm here to say it too, it's so annoying
Typical for a lot of Indians. Just a tic.
Tinytingytingyringytingyringy music sounding in my head already
@@danielcastaneda4975?
You know. You know. You know.........❤
My heart goes out to all victims who died untimely. And the little kids - OMG. Airlines know about bird strikes, then why don’t they make planes such a way where birds cannot strike the engines? Pilots couldn’t control the plane? Who is at fault? The engineers? The company is for sure. RIP
L33 Mo. 33 year old flight attendant. 👁
Thirteen years ago, it ended happily at Warsaw's Okęcie airport. See
"Awaryjne ladowanie kapitana wrony"
Why have a solid 'aircraft mincer' at the end of the runway? The outcome would have been very different.😒
Besides no gear, it also looks like no flaps or slats. Indicating a possible loss of hydraulics and thus a higher landing speed and then the extended gear up slide out.
0:52 why are they relieved after losing 179 people and only having 2 people survive?
Considering the video footage and crash, they might have thought none would survive.
It's just their family members of the survivors who r happy
I mean didnt u see that crash they thought none would survive it
POV : when their time has not reached.!!
Miracle of the miracles that 2 survive.
So sad to hear the lost of so many innocent lives.
Condolences for all the Fmly members ! These can happen to anyone !
i don't understand why those engineers could not even protect the engine against birds
yea sure...a bird called larry that took money of maintenance for his 30th mansion
Because birds never estimate the engine of aircraft....
Because standard airliner engines need to take in air, in very large amounts so it needs to be exposed and hence cannot be...shielded, for instance. To get a rough idea for the layman, ever seen depictions of what happens when you stand in front of a running aircraft engine? Yeah, that much air. Now if a bird goes near the engine, which they tend to do to avoid the main fuselage (and for whatever reason they decide to approach a fast moving massive vehicle i'll never know, maybe to perch on the wings of the aircraft or something), they get sucked in. And keep in mind mid-flight the engine is operating far more intensely than on the ground. So lots of kinetic energy being seeped through the engine there. Lots of damage done to the internals. Engine blades are usually designed with efficiency (aerodynamics/cost) in mind, not durability - to a certain extent. You have to understand that materials that can withstand that amount of force don't usually spin for a rotor very well.
That said, engines are rigorously tested, even with bird strike tests where they launch fake birds at the engine. Generally speaking, only engines that pass the safety margin make it out onto market. Even with only a 0.00005% chance of things going wrong, it is still a chance that something goes wrong. Which is why, whilst there are hundreds or thousands of flights daily, the chances of things like this happening is very, very low. That being said, it is not absolute. Accidents will happen, and can go very badly as it did in this case when they do.
Finally, we are not actually sure this accident was caused by the engine. There were mentions of landing gear malfunction, or a bird stuck in the wings (structural damage?). Will wait for more info.
Planes can fly on one engine
O Brasil🇧🇷 deixa aqui registrado nossas condolencias as familias que perderam os seus entes queridos e as pessoas que se foram
Why was there a wall anywhere near the runway?
That's what I was thinking.
It appears to be part of a levee system, possibly to protect the airport against floods or tsunami.
So its clear back of plane is most safe place, 😢 its worst aircraft crash i have seen.
Lockerbie was worse. Blew up in the air over Lockerbie and some of the houses on the ground were hit as well. Pan Am Flight 103, 270 killed, 11 of them on the ground. 21st December 1988. All of Scotland was in mourning that. night.
Which SEAT were the 2 Survivor seating?
They were both flight attendants who sat in the flight attendant seats located in the rear vestibule of the aircraft, I believe.
Can pilots manually lower the gear if there is an issue?
WHY THERE IS A OBSTACLE IN THE RUNWAY?
Why would you record people dying
When you are a pilot, yes you were trained to land on hardened ground including concrete those training is because your gears were functioning properly, but then if not you will have a better chance (if your landing gear doesn’t work) in soft grassy ground surfaces because it creates less friction, less friction less heat lesser chances of aviation fuel to expand and explode!
And the soft surface on the sides of the concrete tarmac will helps as opposing force to slow down the plane, probably rock it side by side and eventually lose both wings and lessen the chance of the engines burn and explode.
We cannot blame the pilots, this wasn’t probably in their training manual. But the mathematical probability at belly up landing without gears it is much higher chance of survival to land in soft surface than hard concrete.
RIP TO THOSE PEOPLE WHO PERISHED IN THAT ACCIDENT.
This is actually included in pilots training.
@ He was probably miss that training session. RIP to him and to all the people on board.
how they film the engine blowing up in mid air? atthst exact time
People do go to airports to film planes coming in to land. They wouldn't have been expecting that dreadful crash though.
I will never ever travel in plane again in future
There are thousands of flights daily and how many crashes do you hear like this? Very few. It is statistically one of the safest modes of transport (far, far safer than driving for example)
Why were the gear up???
Om shanti💐💐💐😢😢😞😞😞
So much sad for your lost. may your soul rest in peace .we are praying for you guy's .stay be strong ❤️🩹Extremely sorry for that😢🎉from Sri Lanka 🇱🇰
Highly suspicious all these accidents all at once....
Of what? Y’all are dumb fks it’s December a holiday season aka more people flying which increases the probability of accidents
Not at all . . Now if they came at regular intervals , THAT would be suspicious .
Yeh, sure, kook
Boeing have been cutting corners for a while now. Don't fly Boeing
Uh both were totally different circumstances. Stop with the nutty conspiracy stuff.
Om Shanti 🙏
May Lord Jesus bless everyone and their families and lead all to the right path. Amen 🙏 ❤
So sad
first reaction??? reported
Rip😢
Who is the genius who built a steel reinforced concrete wall on Muan airport runway?? Does this "Wall of Korea" make any sense to anyone??
How possible that there is a solid structure there.. hmm
It didnt liok like they had their landing gear down??????
Reporter :You know × ♾️😂
2 survived
Irritating "you know"!! Being a reporter, such irritating repetitions should be trained out 😮
Anchor english fantastic 😂😂😂😂😂😂
So sad
I will never fly with JEJU AIRLINES
South Korea ever boasts.. But this time.. No one predicted whatever happens next movement.. I think this is a lesson to them.. That they never humiliate and mis estimate another country....
How do you have access to Internet in North Korea
the first class ppl and the front row ppl are d...😢😢😢I wont seating in the front seat anymore
Was just thinking same! A wall really?😮
@@samsmith6481all but 2 people survived
there props wasnt first class on that 737
Why they directed plane in such a short approach with concrete on the end? WTF?
Should build air fence like motogp did rather than concrete
An after-thought: Could aircraft manufacturers not construct Titanium mesh grilles to fit over the front of jet engine intakes to reduce the debris from bird-strikes entering the compression chamber and damaging the turbines?
Who is that reporter. He need Eno to stop You Know
You know, u know, u know.... havvve havvve...
Thank you so much for this amazing video! Just a quick off-topic question: I have a SafePal wallet with USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). How can I transfer them to Binance?
I suggest everyone buy some kimchi to remember them spicy kimchi
No landing gear and didn't jettison the fuel. Bad decisions.
You know ×150
❤❤❤❤❤❤
😢😢😢😢
Landing gear fault, also Looks like Pilots Fault, as it was landing too fast, they could reduce the speed by applying Air Brake & Reverse Thrust
I'm pretty sure reverse thrust is only able to be activated once the landing gear is weighted, which was obviously not the case here.
@@SwampCityRadio1974yes but aren't they supposed to shut down the engines in the event of a belly landing? The engines were still going.
thats the most stupidest thing i heard, the plane cant use reverse thrust if theres no gear
@@RealBlueMC-Eshan Then this needs to be looked at by the Airline company, in case of emergency the Reverse Thrust should work independently
No they can't use the speed breaks cause if they deployed it then..the spoilers wouldnt deploy at the same time..hence the drag initially caused wouldn't be equal which would cause the plane to veer of the runway
They couldn't use the reverse thrust for the same reason but..in this case the reverse thrust on engine 2 was deployed but the reverse thrust on engine 1 wasn't which is highly unusual
So it would be best to wait for official report
this news report is awful der der der
😭
Abbe you know you know Kya kar raha hai
Boeing has taken enough lives.!!
Very sad
Don't blame Boeing this time around.... it looks like there was fire coming from one of the Engines....Boeing has since improved the Engineering issues it was experiencing...and the Wallstreet $$$ focused CEO was fired!
😢😢
Aliens in Drones from New Jersey shot the plane down with anti gravity laser beams.Did I miss any hairbrained concepts? please let me know.Thanks and have a nice day.
I was there, horrible horrible ms 23😢
Виглядає, як птиця, але не факт.
Sue Boeing
Why pilot decided to land with faulty landing gears on smooth runway. This is common failure and there must be better procedures like landing on water or field.
The engine mounts are design to break away under certain sever stress. But a water landing with under slung engines will most likely result in the aircraft "digging in" to the water and the instant high G forces encountered will likely be un-survivable. If anyone survives, they have to be able to extricate and exit the aircraft, and either be able to deploy life vest, and/or make it to a raft, if a raft is available, then endure/survive possible hypothermia. This is regular people with not training or skills to apply in this situation, and military aviators having gone through rigorous training, and expecting search and rescue assets ready and able to assist, still have a rough chance of surviving.
The second issue of "field" is the better than ditching (water landing), but if one engine shears and the other does not, a "cartwheeling" event will be very low survivable for anyone, as well as no one/equipment to respond in a timely manner to deal with post impact fire, or trauma when minutes count for survival.
Landing at an airfield really is the best option, and the aircraft did decelerate and bled off a tremendous amount of energy (speed). Unfortunatly, the wall was the greatest thing that eliminated a better outcome and survival of those on board.
Does the possibility of every airport encountering such a scenario as this event, justify the creation of sufficient overrun for every runway?
Perhaps. But that cost will be passed on to the person buying passage.
And, like it or not, we live in a "cost/benefit", real or imagined, culture. And every one of are at our core, bean counters.
If I had a nickel for every person that said, "I don't care the cost, make it happen, and then proclaims someone is taking them for a ride", I would have too much money needing a way to be spent to be replying to people I may never meet that exist in the innerwebs.
But, I do hope any who read this, that you never encounter such a flight as all, but the two poor survivors, and one a Flight Attendant who sill certainly have a lot of guilt going forward.
At least it was quick for the rest. That is a bittersweet thing.
Hug those you love, love on your cats, dogs, turtles, etc., and tell your friends how much they mean to you, every chance you get.
Azerbaijani plane was shut by Russia, and is Jeju Air being shot by North Korea?
We all know it is boeing aircraft defective. They had to answer to the American congress and all they did was give excuses
Only two people live it is crazy
Feeling like they must be Main character
One plane crash no one survive in one plane crash 2 survive
Nowadays people will scare sitting on a plane too many accidents are happening what is going on🙄
You know?
RUSSIA
Boeing, again, of course….
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Lindu 🐷
😢😢😢😢