Which countries could DEFEAT RUSSIA in a 3rd WORLD WAR?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 27 кві 2024
- USA knows that, one-on-one, he has the odds on his side for victory, but his interests worldwide have earned him quite a few powerful enemies. A global conflict would allow Russia to add the third great power to its side: an emerging China that has approached the best armies in recent decades through new developments and advanced military technology.
Do you want to know more about Russia today? I leave you here! 👇
📌The engineering of the most ADVANCED BOMBERS in Russia
• The engineering of the...
📌Russia SOLD 8 Tu-160 Bombers In the middle of the WAR!
• Russia SOLD 8 Tu-160 B...
--------------------------------------------
#RUSSIA #WAR #AIRFORCE
Do you want to know more about Russia today? I leave you here! 👇
📌The engineering of the most ADVANCED BOMBERS in Russia
ua-cam.com/video/WrF-_s-8NG8/v-deo.html
📌Russia SOLD 8 Tu-160 Bombers In the middle of the WAR!
ua-cam.com/video/B52-GoMMKNg/v-deo.html
Military Industrial Complex.
That's who truly emerges as victorious ~ also bankers, companies contracted to rebuild and profit after the wars and dont forget politicians.
Interesting video, but the conclusion does not follow the analysis. It is the US that will resort to nukes first as it runs out of conventional arms, and this has always been the case.
What a nonsensical thing to say. The U.S. has never run out of arms and used fat man and little boy to save lives. Anyone with an I.Q. over 10 knows that there can be no winners in an all our nuclear war. Neither can there be a "contained" nuclear war.
We humans are our own WORST enemies so with being said the world we know tdy will be gone 2ma
It would really be nice if whoever put in the subtitles for the first man speaking could indeed translate and spell what he said properly. I can understand numerous accents, but apparently the people who worked on this video can't. It's a shame.
The ONLY reason that our enemies are flexing their muscles is that we have the WEAKEST POTUS America has EVER seen. If he goes away in November, things will change.
A WWIII would, barring nuclear weapon deployment, be won by the US and its allies and any war between US and any other sole nation wouldn't even be close, again, barring nuclear deployment, which would be the zero sum gain most expect. The US has such advanced capabilities, it boggles the mind. Sure, China and Russia have their own great equipment, but the US has the advantage in both technology and training, as best we can tell. There is no question on technology to date, but training can change at any moment. Still, 11 "Super carriers" and their protective fleets are all but unstoppable in conventional battle and I think to that end, there is no close 2nd place. The strength of a carrier force group is simply massive, let alone all of them in battle groups. The air superiority is undeniable and any conventional attack against the USA has little chance of success, considering the most powerful defense forces the world hasn't even seen. I have been wrong before, but I'm certain in my convictions here because I believe the US advancements haven't even slowed since the early 1980's and the capabilities aren't just enormous, but hard to even put into words.
Not much of an analysis, it sounds like you’re concluding the war’s outcome would depend upon whether or not the United States had an alliance of other major free world European and Asian nation’s military strength to combine with the United States. And whether that alliance could coalesce quickly enough to respond to counter a first strike by these international bad actors.
I do agree, the triple partnership of Russia, China, and North Korea (don’t forget the ever present radical Arab/Persian threat) could be beaten.
But once Russia or China goes atomic…, well…, we’re all doomed.
You forgot to include all the middle east players who would undoubtedly agree on a limited alliance for certain conditions.
As for your assessment of a unified China and North Korean alliance is at best wishful thinking. As is the condition of them fielding the mass numbers of military equipment for Land, Sea and Air deployment.
Russia has been exposed. They are not the gigantic fearsome Bear we were told to fear.
China has invested heavily in equipment in all branches of the PLA save one. Training in strategic warfare. Does not matter what you have for hardware. If you have no skills or competent leadership you have already destroyed any hope a victory.
As for NK... It's Nk.
Aside from Nukes and overwhelming canon fodder manpower bodies. The idea of an unstoppable axis of evil being a threat to NATO is at this moment in time very unlikely.
But should Putin consider Nukes. Then that would be an entirely different scenario.
Albania!