Finally someone who can explain classical conditioning. I've had two different teachers who couldn't figure out how the various types of stimuli are labeled.
Little piece of trivia: Classical conditioning is what usually teaches us fears. And it can be used to reinforce behavior as well, but it's not as effective as operant conditioning.
MHVet its more association than conditioning because it doesnt fit into the descriptions of classical or operant conditioning since there is no reinforcement nor an unconditioned response - you might, however, be operantly conditioned to make this comment after observing others making comments and getting likes/approval, so you imitate their behavior
@@rory7993 indeed this is association and logic induction USSR propaganda uses red colors and russia styled fonts This video uses red colors and russia styled fonts Conclusion: this video is probably USSR propaganda
It feels like a USSR propaganda because it is inspired by an famous communist graphic designer called El Lissitzky. Stop at 1:43 and google his name. "Beat the whites with the red wedge"
Wow 😳. Your communication skill is soo good. Also teaching style is unique. U r Teaching in an specific and marvelous way, which helps to understanding and decoding it easy. Lots of Greatful From Pakistan 🇵🇰
I know it's been a long time since you wrote this, but out of curiosity, did you pass that exam? Also asking because I have had a bad experience of trying to learn from a YT videos just before examination.
That disturbingly illuminates why I want so badly to change my birth name. You hear it called enough times in a certain tone and then get yelled at for something you did wrong, hearing it in other settings still produces the same anxiety. Hurray.
Trick question: if this video reminds you of communist propaganda was it positive or negative reinforcement or positive or negative punishment? What is the stimulus?
P H neither one of them I'd guess since there hasn't been any behavior to reinforce. I'm just guessing, but I'd say it would be a conditioned stimulus.
I think its classical conditioning isn't it? You are associating or reminded of the communist propaganda by connecting it to an emotion of deceit and distrust however it was framed. So the stimulus might be the animation's colours with the maps which just really makes me think of history class
Nice style of animation. The difference demonstrated in the video is just. Which appears to be an even more distinctive feature between two demonstrated types of conditioning is that the first one occurs as subconscious activity whilst the latter represents conscious (deliberate) behaviour.
Classical conditioning continues to have a profound influence on the fields of psychology and behavioural neuroscience. It is interesting to consider that Pavlov and his associates not only discovered the learning process of classical conditioning, they then went on to identify almost all of the major components of classical conditioning (i.e. conditioned and unconditioned stimuli and responses), developed the primary paradigms of delay, trace, simultaneous, and backward conditioning and identified and described many of the parameters that influence the process of classical conditioning. They also described acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery and dis inhibition, as well as higher order conditioning, second-signal systems, conditioned discrimination.
Very interesting. I wonder how well operant conditioning would work on someone who is consciously aware of that it is happening. For example if I use operant conditioning on myself to encourage certain behaviour by rewarding myself after I have done something like studying. Maybe one can use operant conditioning to change habits completely? But how big of an affect will this have? I'm considering to try this with exercise.
So by REMOVING the homework (negative reinforcement) are you also ADDING free time (positive reinforcement)? Does it really depend on how we view things? By ADDING a timeout, are we REMOVING free time etc., etc.?
TheScientistA4 As far as I know it depends on how the person who received the reinforcement view things... I mean, at the end of the day it keeps beings a reinforcement
Yes, I find the example on negative reinforcement to be confusing. Will the act of removing the homework strengthen the person's achievement in the exam, or maybe in future exams?
I believe you are mistaken, claiming Professor Pavlov ‘showed dogs some food and rang a bell at the same time’. My understanding is that the sound of the bell preceded the feeding, not rung at the same time. I would appreciate clarification on this point as the timing of the two stimuli is central to the whole concept of classical conditioning.
You are correct. Pavlov conducted multiple experiments. Classical conditioning occurred when a bell was rung immediately before the dogs were fed, and this resulted in the dogs salivating in response to the ringing bell later. This is the foundation of marker (or clicker) training for dogs, orcas, and other animals. When Pavlov experimented with ringing a bell while dogs were eating, those dogs made no connection between the ringing bell and being fed, and thus did not salivate at the sound of the bell later.
Vecthur just because you learned about it doesn’t change it, just like how when you learn that every action you do or make is caused by releasing of chemicals in the brain etc... doesn’t take any fun or anything away or then you would just sit around and do nothing becuase you feel likes it’s pointless since you know how it works
For those interested, read More with Paul Chance, Skinner, Ribes, Wolpe. Etc... This kind of effects occur not only with observable behavior but Also with private behavior, like thoughts and emotions, so it can be quite complicated and More interesting than people give it crédit for. Just think about how politicians use certain ley words to associate the "fulfillment" of a public need with their objectives, therefore associating possitive emotions with their dialogue.
The necessity to digest cellulose is very important for animals in the plains where glucose-providing fruit isn't available (compared to other primates who never needed to do a lot and had all their needs provided by fruit). Either that or just cook the ruminants who have the bacteria for fermenting plant fibre into amino acids usable by other animals. Thus animal products form a cheaper and more straight-forward way to obtain proteins, especially some which we cannot synthesize ourselves.
This video teaches us that doctors who lie can traumatize kids and that saying thank you is just society making everyone feel better when they help others
There are two types of punishment. We called them punishment type I and punishment type II (I'm translating from German). Punishment type I is when you add something unpleasent, something negative like a punch in the face or grounding. Punishment type II is taking away something pleasant like taking away the mobile phone. I know it is a really late reply but I just had the urge to answer.
Classical conditioning seems very similar to the mechanism underlying phobia's & I guess that's why Cognitive Behavioural Therapy seems effective in curing them?
So when some when with the intention approaches i have got conditioned to respond. I have requested several times cease doing that then the association would die. Reinforcement (ringing of bell every time food is given) does create association. And more the reinforcements more is the reflex action. These people know that and are using that to defame me.
I was under the impression that classical conditioning required repeated association, not just learning through one trial? So does this mean that one powerful experience on its own is able to trigger a conditioned response afterwards when a similar conditioned stimulus is presented?
Aaron Henderson it’s not usual but it can happen... also I’m not sure if it works with a similar conditioned stimulus. For example, food aversion is learned with just one trial... we can associate stomachache with any specific food and then stop eating it. Just an example, hope you understand... English is not my first language.
Energy has no options, other then the reaction to the opposite. Humans call them emotions, yet the recharging draw point is the same. So technically the exterior is just along for the ride of the interior, just as vice versa. Like atoms, the destructive force assimilates within the substructure of the collective much like an emotion. How they both react are somewhat similar. Creative or destructive forces, the emotion refers to as good or bad. The reaction is the same, physic to proxy.
No, that would be a positive punishment - the receipt (positive) of a stimulus to discourage (punishment) behaviour. Positive = Receive / Negative = Remove Reinforcement = Encourage behaviour / Punishment = Discourage behaviour
I think as long as the person knows there mistakes, it's all good. I think as long as people don't forget how to communicate and understand each other. It's all good. :-)
Number 58 the production was nice, but the descriptions were technically inaccurate. The opening bit about classical conditioning had the common mistake about the dog associating the bell with the food. Technically, associate means to put together, and it was Pavlov, not the dog, that associated the bell and the food.
I'm a bit disappointed they didn't go over the negative aspects of using very negative stimulus for punishment will actually backfire in the long run...
What do you bet that for the rest of his life, whenever he hears a bell, Pavlov thought about feeding the dogs.
I haven't seen a smarter comment in the feed ;)
Lol
@Bowden C.
😂😂😂Brilliantly said!
Mind = blown.
Nice twist.
“Tell me, I won’t get mad, I promise”
Classical conditioning we all have
😂
Wait I got chills-
Trust issues here 😂
Ahhh, "We need to talk" is classical conditioning, then....
OMG yes
best comment ever!!=)))
😂😂😂
@@nurkhairianissofeaabdrahim3856 listen to Ted Ed, then read comments...
And so is randomly getting a text from someone that just says "hey." INSTANT anxiety for me.
Finally someone who can explain classical conditioning. I've had two different teachers who couldn't figure out how the various types of stimuli are labeled.
its kinda confusing ngl
I really like this animation style, is there a specific name for this style apart from USSR propaganda?
Constructivism.
nice thanks dood
USSR conditioning ;)
@비니보이 yes and it looks good
Yes, Constructivism "invented" by El Lissitzky.
Last day of study for the exam tomorrow.
Definitely easier to understand compared to my notes.
+ljd710 So...how did it go?
1Atlkid Wow this was a while ago... But I remember doing really well in that part of the test. Passed overall
same 😂😂
dammmm its my turn tmr
My turn today in two hours
This came up after I watched a vid about Kafka. The graphics are (mwah, chef's kiss) perfecto
Little piece of trivia: Classical conditioning is what usually teaches us fears. And it can be used to reinforce behavior as well, but it's not as effective as operant conditioning.
This looks and feels like USSR propaganda lol
No. its true. You are conditioned to do things automatic.
You are conditioned to see this particular image style as a USSR propaganda, boom.
MHVet its more association than conditioning because it doesnt fit into the descriptions of classical or operant conditioning since there is no reinforcement nor an unconditioned response - you might, however, be operantly conditioned to make this comment after observing others making comments and getting likes/approval, so you imitate their behavior
@@rory7993 indeed this is association and logic induction
USSR propaganda uses red colors and russia styled fonts
This video uses red colors and russia styled fonts
Conclusion: this video is probably USSR propaganda
It feels like a USSR propaganda because it is inspired by an famous communist graphic designer called El Lissitzky. Stop at 1:43 and google his name. "Beat the whites with the red wedge"
Wow 😳. Your communication skill is soo good. Also teaching style is unique. U r Teaching in an specific and marvelous way, which helps to understanding and decoding it easy. Lots of Greatful From Pakistan 🇵🇰
OMG! This helped so much more then my Psych notes. Thank you for this video! I have my final tomorrow.
I know it's been a long time since you wrote this, but out of curiosity, did you pass that exam?
Also asking because I have had a bad experience of trying to learn from a YT videos just before examination.
Yea did you pass? Do you have a degree or a good job now? Curious!!
Well, well, years later I'm here to pass mine! Cool
you have NO idea how much this helped! THANK YOU SO MUCH!!!
That disturbingly illuminates why I want so badly to change my birth name. You hear it called enough times in a certain tone and then get yelled at for something you did wrong, hearing it in other settings still produces the same anxiety. Hurray.
This explains it really well... I went over and understood this in class, but I needed to go over it again before the final.
Trick question: if this video reminds you of communist propaganda was it positive or negative reinforcement or positive or negative punishment? What is the stimulus?
P H neither one of them I'd guess since there hasn't been any behavior to reinforce. I'm just guessing, but I'd say it would be a conditioned stimulus.
you are actually engaging in relational framing, which is an operant condition.
uraghhh!!! my brain!
I think its classical conditioning isn't it? You are associating or reminded of the communist propaganda by connecting it to an emotion of deceit and distrust however it was framed. So the stimulus might be the animation's colours with the maps which just really makes me think of history class
LOL
Fascinating lesson about both classical and operant conditioning today on UA-cam.
Nice style of animation. The difference demonstrated in the video is just. Which appears to be an even more distinctive feature between two demonstrated types of conditioning is that the first one occurs as subconscious activity whilst the latter represents conscious (deliberate) behaviour.
washes dishes, mom gives hug to 40 year old man, "thank you for helping me" 😂
Classical conditioning continues to have a profound influence on the fields of psychology and behavioural neuroscience. It is interesting to consider that Pavlov and his associates not only discovered the learning process of classical conditioning, they then went on to identify almost all of the major components of classical conditioning (i.e. conditioned and unconditioned stimuli and responses), developed the primary paradigms of delay, trace, simultaneous, and backward conditioning and identified and described many of the parameters that influence the process of classical conditioning. They also described acquisition, extinction, spontaneous recovery and dis inhibition, as well as higher order conditioning, second-signal systems, conditioned discrimination.
I remember learning about Pavlov's dogs while in school
Very interesting. I wonder how well operant conditioning would work on someone who is consciously aware of that it is happening. For example if I use operant conditioning on myself to encourage certain behaviour by rewarding myself after I have done something like studying. Maybe one can use operant conditioning to change habits completely? But how big of an affect will this have? I'm considering to try this with exercise.
have you tried it big man?
@@MarkiplierOfficial I’m guessing he’s shredded af by now
This video explains it perfectly. THANK YOU!
So by REMOVING the homework (negative reinforcement) are you also ADDING free time (positive reinforcement)? Does it really depend on how we view things? By ADDING a timeout, are we REMOVING free time etc., etc.?
TheScientistA4 As far as I know it depends on how the person who received the reinforcement view things... I mean, at the end of the day it keeps beings a reinforcement
Yes, I find the example on negative reinforcement to be confusing. Will the act of removing the homework strengthen the person's achievement in the exam, or maybe in future exams?
psychology class is so confusing smh
I believe you are mistaken, claiming Professor Pavlov ‘showed dogs some food and rang a bell at the same time’. My understanding is that the sound of the bell preceded the feeding, not rung at the same time. I would appreciate clarification on this point as the timing of the two stimuli is central to the whole concept of classical conditioning.
You are correct. Pavlov conducted multiple experiments. Classical conditioning occurred when a bell was rung immediately before the dogs were fed, and this resulted in the dogs salivating in response to the ringing bell later. This is the foundation of marker (or clicker) training for dogs, orcas, and other animals. When Pavlov experimented with ringing a bell while dogs were eating, those dogs made no connection between the ringing bell and being fed, and thus did not salivate at the sound of the bell later.
Glad to know no examples of punishment were shown.
Pavlov was born before Soviet Russia was a thing. Pavlov wrote letters to Stalin criticising him. Still, the video gets a Soviet-Russia-vibe graphics.
wow such clear explanation thank u Peggy,l was clueless after this video l understand
Thanks for helping AP Psychology students when their teachers can't.
wow the animation was incredible
The animation is so great in this!
am I strange, as the first picture that hits my mind for the word learning is travelling on foot?
Ahhhhhhhh this makes so much sense now, thank you so much.
U solve this vry easy way with marvellous
Short and simple thanks
Beautiful visuals!!
I enjoyed this video it was organized and easy to follow.
Thanks. This is very helpful. I needed that.
*so my mom has been using operant conditioning on me all along*
Vecthur Subconsciously or with the knowledge without knowing the specifics
Vecthur just because you learned about it doesn’t change it, just like how when you learn that every action you do or make is caused by releasing of chemicals in the brain etc... doesn’t take any fun or anything away or then you would just sit around and do nothing becuase you feel likes it’s pointless since you know how it works
you have been manipulated my friend, time to revolt!
For those interested, read More with Paul Chance, Skinner, Ribes, Wolpe. Etc... This kind of effects occur not only with observable behavior but Also with private behavior, like thoughts and emotions, so it can be quite complicated and More interesting than people give it crédit for.
Just think about how politicians use certain ley words to associate the "fulfillment" of a public need with their objectives, therefore associating possitive emotions with their dialogue.
The necessity to digest cellulose is very important for animals in the plains where glucose-providing fruit isn't available (compared to other primates who never needed to do a lot and had all their needs provided by fruit). Either that or just cook the ruminants who have the bacteria for fermenting plant fibre into amino acids usable by other animals. Thus animal products form a cheaper and more straight-forward way to obtain proteins, especially some which we cannot synthesize ourselves.
Great video - I would have likes a few more examples. Thanks
Elevator music, supposed to be calm and soothing but I associate it with childhood experiences at the dentist.
Behaviourism is amazing
I love how this actually happened to me not to long ago only she said, "this shot is normally 1,000 dollars and it will hurt."
This video teaches us that doctors who lie can traumatize kids and that saying thank you is just society making everyone feel better when they help others
Thank you
Simple and understandable. Didn't go over negative reinforcement or positive and negative punishments though /:
There are two types of punishment. We called them punishment type I and punishment type II (I'm translating from German). Punishment type I is when you add something unpleasent, something negative like a punch in the face or grounding. Punishment type II is taking away something pleasant like taking away the mobile phone.
I know it is a really late reply but I just had the urge to answer.
*****
i understood it pretty well so thank you
Thanks
the pigeon art connoisseur experiment blew my mind
A very well illustrated video.
Alan Foreman, damn you're great! Loved the animations!
Very helpful. Thanks
learning more about operant conditioning (:
Classical conditioning seems very similar to the mechanism underlying phobia's & I guess that's why Cognitive Behavioural Therapy seems effective in curing them?
To an untrained eye Hess two types of conditioning can be easily confused. Both are worth studying, though!
This helped a lot! Thanks!
That was good. Thanks Peggy.
I'm going through changes!
Thank you 🙏😊
Great video! Thank you!
"學習" 在心理學上, 是基於體驗 行為改變, 分以下兩種:
．經典條件性反射 響鈴有野食; 看肉流口水是 "本質刺激", 響鈴流口水是 "條件刺激"
．操作性條件反射
I learnt this in psychology class :D
thanks for the video
Ah, me too! Glad I'm not alone in this :P
very helpful thank you
Wow , very informative video
You claimed in 2:14 that "running from there" was a conditioned reflex, I assume it is a mistake, and it is an unconditional reflex.
1:25.. neutral stimulus becomes a conditioned stimulus
2:23... Operant conditioning leads to changes in voluntary behavior..
So when some when with the intention approaches i have got conditioned to respond. I have requested several times cease doing that then the association would die. Reinforcement (ringing of bell every time food is given) does create association. And more the reinforcements more is the reflex action. These people know that and are using that to defame me.
I was under the impression that classical conditioning required repeated association, not just learning through one trial? So does this mean that one powerful experience on its own is able to trigger a conditioned response afterwards when a similar conditioned stimulus is presented?
Aaron Henderson it’s not usual but it can happen... also I’m not sure if it works with a similar conditioned stimulus. For example, food aversion is learned with just one trial... we can associate stomachache with any specific food and then stop eating it. Just an example, hope you understand... English is not my first language.
very good I hope teacher will ask in exam thanks...
very helpful!
Energy has no options, other then the reaction to the opposite. Humans call them emotions, yet the recharging draw point is the same. So technically the exterior is just along for the ride of the interior, just as vice versa. Like atoms, the destructive force assimilates within the substructure of the collective much like an emotion. How they both react are somewhat similar. Creative or destructive forces, the emotion refers to as good or bad. The reaction is the same, physic to proxy.
You guys might want to check out The Psychology of Learning course on FutureLearn. It's great!!!!
adore the soviet format! AND the content.
Is operate conditioning also called as INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING?
Yes
@@THall-vi8cp okay thanks :)
Easy! Thanks!
Do you want an award?
excellent
*cut and dried, amount, English, Webster. I agree with you completely.
Woah, déjà vu! We JUST learned this in psychology!
so interesting
No, that would be a positive punishment - the receipt (positive) of a stimulus to discourage (punishment) behaviour.
Positive = Receive / Negative = Remove
Reinforcement = Encourage behaviour / Punishment = Discourage behaviour
Is classical conditioning conditioning ones reaction?
so classical unconditioned with neutral becomes conditioned, operant is with punishment and reinforcement
this was awesome
Sheldon: Good job. Have a chocolate.
Does anyone remember the episode of The Office where Jim did this to Dwight with tic tacs or gum????
Isn’t operant conditioning how reinforcement learning (a type of ML) works?
Loved the soviet style diagrams, great video
The slide format has a certain soviet art form aesthetic to them. Coincidence?
I think as long as the person knows there mistakes, it's all good. I think as long as people don't forget how to communicate and understand each other. It's all good. :-)
How is your comment on his comment on his comment useful?
I didn't know it was this easy 😆
TERRIBLE analogy with the needle/mirror thing.
Agreed!
+Emma Peterson Right! Lol had me confused, sucks cause you know they could come up with something 10x better
I dunno, I thought it was good...
Number 58 the production was nice, but the descriptions were technically inaccurate. The opening bit about classical conditioning had the common mistake about the dog associating the bell with the food. Technically, associate means to put together, and it was Pavlov, not the dog, that associated the bell and the food.
Can anyone explain why is this so bad?
I think it gets to the point
All i could think of was Frasier trying to prank bulldog
Man this is so ASMR
Not even. Lmao.
I'm a bit disappointed they didn't go over the negative aspects of using very negative stimulus for punishment will actually backfire in the long run...
The artist could've got that idea from the fact that Pavlov is in a large role in the video, but that's just me pondering