Unknown Reason behind Karna's Revenge with Draupadi - Untold Story of Mahabharat
Вставка
- Опубліковано 14 гру 2023
- Support us in our journey by clicking on the 'JOIN' button on our page!
On Screen: Niharika Mohan
Instagram: / niharikamohan_writes
Why was she more than just a wife? Why did she agree to polygamy? Was she cursed? Why was she more special than other wives of pandavas?
Dive deep into the untold story of Draupadi, a pivotal character in the Mahabharata, in this eye-opening video! Contrary to popular belief, Draupadi was not merely the wife of the Pandavas; she held a profound significance that transcended her role as a life partner.
From jaw-dropping prophecies at her birth to the real deal behind her role that was intricately woven to bind the Pandavas together - you won't believe what you're about to discover! Don't miss out on the incredible revelations that reshape our understanding of this iconic character from the Mahabharata!
Intrigued? Click on the join button to support us and be a part of our wonderful community and get exclusive member perks along with a sea of knowledge. Hit that Subscribe button and ring the notification bell to stay updated on our mysterious explorations! Share your thoughts in the comments below, and let's delve into the timeless wisdom of the Mahabharata together!
Research Resources: bitly.ws/34eM3
Desi Crime Stories:
• Based on True Crime St...
The Dark Side:
• The Dark Secrets of...
Indian History & Mythology: • Indian History and Myt...
Mysteries & Conspiracies • Mysteries and Conspira...
Paranormal & Ghost Stories: • Playlist
हमें support और follow करे:
Join our Membership from our Homepage!
INSTAGRAM: / raaaz.world
RAAAZ Shorts: www.youtube.com/@RAAAZshorts/...
TELEGRAM: t.me/BigBrainOfficial
LINKEDIN: / bigbrainmedia
#raaaz #mahabharat #draupadi
-------------------------------------
RAAAZ is a channel that explores the dark and mysterious side of human nature, with a focus on crime and unexplained phenomena. Our content delves into unsolved mysteries, chilling encounters, and haunting legends, all with a keen eye for detail and a dedication to uncovering the truth. Join us on a journey into the heart of darkness, as we unravel the secrets that lie hidden beneath the surface of our everyday lives.
You got two facts wrong :
1. Karna was assumed as a Sutputra(born of mixed race/varna) not Shudra
2. When Draupadi was bought into Hastinapur sabha and was insulted Vikarna among Kaurava Brothers and Vidura protested and argued to save Draupadi's honor at beginning. But they were silenced.
@sigma_01460 you really have no clue about who was Karn. Kabhi Suryaputra Karn ka naam suna hai? Karn was the son of Suryadev, not any charioteer
@sigma_01460Do you even know that a son born to a Kshatriya father and a Brahmin mother is called a Suta...
@sigma_01460 bhai please pdh le pahle... Kaha likha hai ki karna ka varna shudra tha, ved vyas se jyada pta hai tumko?
bhai tum surya putra karna ka nai sony putra karna ka fan ho😅...
Pahle ved vyas krit mahabharat padho. Mai pdha hu aur mai karna ki sachchai janata hu, karna ek adharmi tha, duryodhan ko barbad krne wala bhi krna hi hai.
@sigma_01460 Suta is a blend of Brahmin and Kshatriya. Even Keechak was a Suta. Sudeshna was Keechak's sister married to Virat. Even Sanjaya was the son of Brahmin mother and Kshatriya father. No where in MB it is stated that Karna was a Shudra.
@sigma_01460
😂😂😂😂 Charioteer Soot hote hai Shudr nahi, Brahman Stree jab Kshatriye Purush se vivah karte hai usse jo santan hue Vo soot bane.
Karn Apne ko Kshatriye Bolta hai, Aur vaise bhi Karna Anga Pradesh ke Raja ka Beta tha, Usko Sarthi ne adopt kar liya tha.
I really want a detailed video on KARN
Agar padh na ata ha to ved vyas ji ki Mahabharat padho barna a log jhuth mangadant bakwas serial aur WhatsApp University ka agyan failayenge tum usiko satya manoge. Aur apna paisa mat barbad karo inn dharm dushak mulla o ke channel pe. Hare Krishna Hari bol 👍🙏😀
Yes
One of the strongest female characters of our Puranas, equivalent to Devi! 🙏
Agar padh na ata ha to ved vyas ji ki Mahabharat padho barna a log jhuth mangadant bakwas serial aur WhatsApp University ka agyan failayenge tum usiko satya manoge. Aur apna paisa mat barbad karo inn dharm dushak mulla o ke channel pe. Hare Krishna Hari bol 👍🙏😀
gita acharan namka channel me ved vyas ji ki sampurn Mahabharat ha usko sun sakte ho. Hare Krishna Hari bol 👍🙏😀
You have no righteousness….your bibek is similar to 👿
Not devi she was a vaishya according to yampuran
@@godgaming9114 teri ma vaishya bhootnike. Hare Krishna Hari bol 👍🙏😀
Drupadi was also a great thinker, administrator and advisor to pandavas. There are many facets to her personality which can be discovered by reading the mahabharat .
What makes me the happiest is that she so beautifully but with conviction cleared all the misconceptions people have about Mahabharata and its characters, Draupadi never insulted Duryodhan but the highly dramatised television versions always depict this in such a massy manner that it irks me and also the perfect representation of Karna, he was a great warrior but he certainly wasn't a good man, He deliberately instigated Duryodhana and Dushashana to disrobe Draupadi. He even insulted her, but all these television shows depict him as a nobleman who was righteous and revered he may have had a few good characteristics but he wasn't all sunshine and people need to understand that. Thank you RAAZ for this wonderful video and beautiful insights. 🥰
gita acharan namka channel me ved vyas ji ki sampurn Mahabharat ha usko sun sakte ho. Hare Krishna Hari bol 👍🙏😀
Then why draupadi insult him in her wedding???. draupadi true love was Karna 💪
@@sougatmohapatra1663if your mother true love is karn then it doesn't mean that everyone's true love is karn
sabhi insan sabhi k sath kabhi bhi acha nehi hota hai kisi k liye acha yaa kisi k liye bura bhi hota hai jinhone unka acha rup dekha jese danveer karna tha woh usk samne koi kuch mange or woh khali haat lot jaye yeh kabhi bhi nehi hota tha to jinhone uska woh rup dekha tha unk liye woh ek acha insan hi tha likin jinhone uska bura rup dekha unk liye woh bure the to character puri tarha black and white nehi hota hai gray hota hai hum ager khudko kisi jaga per rakhk dekhe hum bhi sabk liye acha sabit nehi ho payenge hum bhi kisi k liye bura honge to kisi k liye acha honge hum bhi alag insan k sath alag alag behaviour kartehi hai or wese hi unk maan mai humare chavi bhi banti hai
@@sougatmohapatra1663You are contradicting yourself... 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
If draupadi love Karna, why she rejected him???? 😂😂😂😂
Answer - Draupadi never loved her father's aged Karna...
Karna was a characterless man who instigated Duryodhana to disrobe her in public...
Really love the way this video presented and edited ❤❤ you're so hardworking 🎉🎉
Birth of Mata Draupadi(Krishna)and Drishtadyumna🙏🏻
"Then a youth who resembled a god arose from the flames. His complexion was like the fire and his form was terrible. He wore a crown on his head and his body was encased in excellent armour. He had a sword in his hand and a bow and arrows and he let out many kind roars. As soon as he was born, he ascended a supreme chariot and west forth. All the Panchalas were delighted and exclaimed. "Blessed!" From the sky issued the voice of an invisi ble and great being."This terrible prince has been born for Drona's destruction. He will increase the fame of the Panchalas and remove the king's grief." Then a young muiden arose from the centre of the altar. She was blessed with good fortune and was known as Panchali. She was beautiful and her waist was shaped like an altar. She dark. Her eyes were like the petals of lotuses. Her hair was dark blue and curled. She was truly a goddess born in human form. The sweet fragrance of blue lotuses emanated from her body, a full 2 miles27 away. Her form and sapreme beauty were such that she had no equal on earth. When the one with beautiful hips was born, the invisible voice said,
"Supreme among women, this beauty of the dark complexion will bring about the destruction of the Kshatriyas. In time, this one with the beautiful waist will perform the objective of the gods. From her will arise terrible fear among the Kshatriyas." Hearing this, all the Panchalas roared like a pride of lions.The earth was sumable to bear their great joy.
"On seeing these two, Prishati wished to get them and came to Yaja and said, "Let these two know no one but me as their nuosher." Desiring to please the king.Yaja agreed. The Brahmanas, whose desires were entirely satisfied, gave the two names."Because of his great courage and because he has been born from lustre, let this son of Drupada be called Dhrishtadyumna. 25 Became she is dark in complexion, let her be called Krishna." Thus Drupada's twin children were born from the great sacrifice. Bharadvaja's powerful son took the Panchala prince Dhrishtadyumna to his own house and taught him the use of all weapons. Thus did the illustrious Drona ensure that his own deeds would become famous, because the immensely wise one knew that what was destined would come to be."
Chaitraratha Parv- Chapter 155(Bori CE).
I was waiting for RAAAZ Team to make a video on Draupadi. Loved the video
It is her ability to overcome adversity in a venerable manner that sets her apart from other women. As a result Draupadi becomes the most complex and controversial female character in the Hindu literature.
Karn Soot tha, Shudra nahi (Soot vo hote hai jinki Maa Brahman aur Pita Kshatriya hote hai aur ye dwij varn-sankar jaati hai).. plus Draupadi ne kabhi bhi Karn ko "shudra ya soot" kehke insult bhi nahi kiya aur dhanush se nishaana lagaane se mana bhi nahi ki kabhi.. infact Mahabharat book ke shlok me saaf likha hai ki vahan baither darshak kehte hai "Karn khud dhanush par pratyancha tak nahi chadha paya to nishana kya lagaata aur Karn nahi laga paya to ye Brahman (Arjun Brahman getup ne the) kya nishana lagaega" clear aata hai vahan.. is video me ye log Draupadi pe zyadatar baate sahi batai gayi hai par kuch jhuth bataya gaya hai, khud Mahabharat book padhlo tum khud bhi vohi kahoge jo hum sab keh rahe
@@pallavi.vaidik...... Ye log Fake News फैलाने वाले । क्योंकि इनका Intention ही ठीक नहीं है। इनका UA-cam channel का Description पढो़ । inka UA-cam channel, Haunting Legends, Chilling Encounters, Crime, Dark 🌑and Mysterious side of human ke baare mein hain. Ye log Truth , Truth bol ke sirf "Truth Claim "karte rhte hain ,jo inhe Truth lagta hain, vahi Truth Claim ye log dusro ko sunaate rhte hain. Bharatiya Sanskriti ke saath sirf aur sirf खिलवाड़ kar rhe ye log . Dark🌑 Theme🌑
Agar padh na ata ha to ved vyas ji ki Mahabharat padho barna a log jhuth mangadant bakwas serial aur WhatsApp University ka agyan failayenge tum usiko satya manoge. Aur apna paisa mat barbad karo inn dharm dushak mulla o ke channel pe. Hare Krishna Hari bol 👍🙏😀
gita acharan namka channel me ved vyas ji ki sampurn Mahabharat ha usko sun sakte ho. Hare Krishna Hari bol 👍🙏😀
@@harekrishna2291 wo uska paisa hai, uski marzi jaise kharch kare. Teri kyun phatt rahi hai be?
As per All Recensions of Original Mahabharat
1) Karna Was unable to lift the bow.
2)Karna was the assumed to be son of A Suta, Meaning, born of Brahman and Kshatriya or Vaishya.
Please don't add the regional folklores and fake rumours so to make it sound good...
True
Karna actually lift the bow there are several phrases where it states he lift the bow
Absolutely thrilled with the innovation and insight in RAAAZ by BigBrainco! 🚀 Your commitment to excellence and forward-thinking is truly inspiring. Keep pushing boundaries and creating a positive impact. The world needs more trailblazers like you. 👏✨ #BigBraincoInnovation #InspirationInProgress
Very nice video that I like ! Thank you for sharing it with pleasure ; Happy Friday to you !
Really enlightning. The way you reveal alternate theories that make more logic. Please creat a video on Karan.
Your channel's video are always interesting, and these videos really put good impact on me...... So, I just want to say THANKS ❤to the channel
Some passages from BORI’s critical edition and their meaning which proves whether Draupadi rejects Karna or not:
(1) ADI PARVA - SECTION 177:
धृष्टद्युम्न उवाच||
दुर्योधनो दुर्विषहो दुर्मुखो दुष्प्रधर्षणः |
विविंशतिर्विकर्णश्च सहो दुःशासनः समः ||१||
युयुत्सुर्वातवेगश्च भीमवेगधरस्तथा |
उग्रायुधो बलाकी च कनकायुर्विरोचनः ||२||
सुकुण्डलश्चित्रसेनः सुवर्चाः कनकध्वजः |
नन्दको बाहुशाली च कुण्डजो विकटस्तथा ||३||
एते चान्ये च बहवो धार्तराष्ट्रा महाबलाः |
कर्णेन सहिता वीरास्त्वदर्थं समुपागताः ||४||
As above highlighted, it is clear that Karna attends Draupadi’s Swayamvar along with other kings including Duryodhana, Durvisaha, Durmukha, etc.
This means that Karna is invited in the Swayamvar. It also indicates that Drupada (Draupadi’s father) does not consider Karna unqualified for the Swayamvar.
Thanks for the video 😊❤
Thanks for untold story of mahabharat ❤
Mata Draupadi didn't said Andhe ka Putra Andha to Duryodhan.She wasn't present at that moment when this incident happened.Only Pandavs were there.She was in the inner quarters.Actually In 14th century, a tamil author “Villiputurār” mentioned this interpolation or fake incident of Draupadi laughing at Duryodhana in his book Villipparatam just to make the story more spicy.
In the year 1954, an individual named Dharmaveer Bharti who used to publish a magazin titled “Dharm Yug” in his play titled as “Andha Yug” published in the magazine, for the first time mentioned the phrase Andhe Kā Putra Andhā.
In the year 1965 Bollywood Movie Mahabharat showed the scene in which Draupadi addressed Duryodhana with that phrase.They showed this interpolation just to make the story more spicy and eye catchy.
From this Play and especially this movie..Many TV serial, book writers, blog writers and TV serial producers took inspiration and publicised this interpolation.
Even what you have seen in New Mahabharat that Mata Draupadi told Samrat Yuddhisthir to take the weapons of Duryodhan and others was also a fictional story but not a reality.
Very nice and informative video. Kafi kuch nyi knowledge mili. Thanx
Really Appreciate the hardwork by the team
thank you so much for these wonderful contents
lots of love from Nepal
We need more videos on Mahabharat
Great work!
Right now Mahabharata is good, but after watching some of your videos, some things have become clear to me.🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
Bilkul galat information asal me sankat Bhishma ke pratigya lene ke baad aur Kuru vansh ka patan Shakuni aur uske parivaar ko karagaar me bandi banane ke baad se shuru hoti hai real Mahabharata 👈👍🙏🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩
Our Suru to bhishm jab ambika our naam nhi yaad rahe usko lene ke baad ho huva he mahabharat me clear kaha jab se Shakuni our anya sab se suru hu a
Galat information nhi a mian tha jo druapdi ka apman a bahut badi galti thi a satya he ha shakuni bhi kaurav ka anth se bhi suru main draupadi ka apman bagwan ke sam ne
@@SanatanSena-xv8qw Bheeshm ne pratigya in sab ke janam se pahle liya tha 😉👍🚩🚩🚩
@@VISIONARY777-cd7sptum dono galat bol rhe ho 😂😂😂 b.ori MAHABHARAT padho kabhi . Shuni ko karagar Mila hi nahi kabhi 😂😂😂
@@saffronisehindu4600 कौन से देश से हो भारत से तो बिलकुल नहीं लगते हो और यह shuni कौन है महाभारत में ऐसा कोई व्यक्ति नहीं है पहले जाके खुद पड़ो फिर आके कॉमेंट करो👈👍😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
pls cover Mahabharata in 4 diff videos..of 30 mins each.. I'll be thankful
Suta is not Shudra. It is a breed of brahmin and kshatriya. According to old manuscripts, Karna failed in Draupadi"s Swayamwar. He missed the target. Draupadi never insulted Karna. She also didn't insult Duryodhana.
आप सही है,ami ganatra भी यह बात कह चुकी हैं कही podcast में
@@arjun8078 Maine kai baar Mahabharata pada. Har Southern version aur BORI main likha hain ki karn Draupadi swayamwar main pratyancha chada nahin paaya. Andhe ks Putra andha TV serial main hi milta hain.
In my class 7 Hindi textbook Bal Mahabharat Katha I read in the Draupadi Swayamvar episode that when karna was about to lift the bow and attach the bow string then suddenly the bow shaft slipped from his hands and fell on his face for which his lip was wounded and started bleeding.
@@arjun8078 Not only Ami Ganatra, but even in quora, I came across these things.
No drapudi did stopped karna but she didn't told suth putra it was his father Drapuad who actually said that
Too good as always ❤
yes we want full detailed video on KARN. plzzzz
What are saying? Karan never talked about cheerharan… he was having soft corner for Draupadi
And
The third Pandava prince Arjuna was Karna's peer and equal…There are two reasons why he doesn’t kill Bheema, despite having all the options to do so. 1. Karna has given his word to Kunti, that his 5 sons will remain alive. If he kills Bheema, he can’t kill Arjuna. 2. If Karna kills Bheema, he would do injustice to Draupadi’s unstrangled hair. Draupadi has taken a vow that until and unless someone brings the blood of Dussasana’s heart and wets her hair, she will never tie her hair. Bheema has made a vow that he will kill Dussasana and bring his hearts blood to Draupadi. If he kills Bheema in this battle, he will do injustice to Draupadi.
There is another legend which says that its Karna who prevented the cheerharan of Draupadi by Vasuki . Vasuki could only be pacified by the eldest Kunti-putra (Karna).
😂😂 lol go n read the original one
one of my favourite character from mahabharat❤ thank you raaaz for video❤
Really loves to watch this channel's video
I would really like a video on Karna. Was he really as good and noble of a man as we think him to be?
Vedavyasa himself quotes, there "Dushtachatustaya" (4 evil minded people) in this story . They are Duryodhana, Dushyasana, Shakuni and KARNA..!! This is the truth..!!
What about Yudhishthir and Draupadi?
See brother, Mahabharat is not a simple epic to read and understand, you need to understand it's essence with different perspective..That being said, Yudhishthir was not evil minded, he never did anything wrong to anybody with personal intention. The only problem with yudhishthir was he was too dharmik and that created lot of problems, else he was excellent administrator.
Coming to draupadi, she is the only character in Mahabharata, whom if you study carefully, will make blood to flow from your eyes. She did not do anything wrong, but she faced sooooooo many problems in entire story. I feel pity for her. Kindly do not point fingers at her atleast, please read the original script of Mahabharata and feel it.
@@menandersinghdhandla5472 Yudhisthir and Draupadi were selected by Lord Krishna himself to be the Emperor and Empress of Bharatvarsha. Why would God select evil people to lead a society he cleansed through a huge war? Think.
Very very thanks to all team of raaz ki aapne real fact Draupadi ke bare me bata kyuki aaj kal Mahabharat ke naam pe kuch bhi bataya ja raha ha ❤❤🙏🙏🙏🙏🙇🙇🙇
Karn Soot tha, Shudra nahi (Soot vo hote hai jinki Maa Brahman aur Pita Kshatriya hote hai aur ye dwij varn-sankar jaati hai).. plus Draupadi ne kabhi bhi Karn ko "shudra ya soot" kehke insult bhi nahi kiya aur dhanush se nishaana lagaane se mana bhi nahi ki kabhi.. infact Mahabharat book ke shlok me saaf likha hai ki vahan baither darshak kehte hai "Karn khud dhanush par pratyancha tak nahi chadha paya to nishana kya lagaata aur Karn nahi laga paya to ye Brahman (Arjun Brahman getup ne the) kya nishana lagaega" clear aata hai vahan.. is video me ye log Draupadi pe zyadatar baate sahi batai gayi hai par kuch jhuth bataya gaya hai, khud Mahabharat book padhlo tum khud bhi vohi kahoge jo hum sab keh rahe
Lovely Video!! So glad you didn't sugarcoat Karan character. Yes we want another video of Karan, he was also an adharmi no doubt
I always think that Draupadi's true love was Arjun but throughout this video I was able to know a lot more
this is next level 🔥
Thank you raaz team to saying this fact
Veri good video one of the best video I ever seen in UA-cam
I want detailed video about karna..
I think draupadi is smart women in that era of Mahabharata 🧠🔥✨💯
Thank You for the video 🙏 Excelent presentation of the brief important life events of Draupadi. Though one should also understand that almost every main character in Mahabharata maybe from Shantanu, Satyavati, each events associated with there life are important for us to understand. Eg. there is a question in Mahabharata epic who suffered the most, was it Bhishma, Karna, Vidura, Kunti. Karna was given a chnace to change sides by Sri Krishna Himself. Though He knew the future, the past etc. still why was Karna given a chance? The second thing Krishna & Arjuna had to fight with Karna in that present eon. That was the last birth of Karna. It was said by Krishna to first understand Sri Rama completely & then try to understand Him. But when we read Mahabharata we slowly understand the characters of Ramayana. Maybe that was the reason Vyasa Maharishi wanted Sri Ganesha to write this great epic, the God of profound wisdom, intelligence & knowledge.
we want a complete dedicated video on KARNA
I love your explaination❤
Very thankful for this video being made. Request to please check your pronunciations of the names of the people.
Really love to hear the truth
Really love the way this video is presented and edited 🔥🔥 The story at the end is so well narrated. Thank you Raaaz for another masterpiece
Agar padh na ata ha to ved vyas ji ki Mahabharat padho barna a log jhuth mangadant bakwas serial aur WhatsApp University ka agyan failayenge tum usiko satya manoge. Aur apna paisa mat barbad karo inn dharm dushak mulla o ke channel pe. Hare Krishna Hari bol 👍🙏😀
gita acharan namka channel me ved vyas ji ki sampurn Mahabharat ha usko sun sakte ho. Hare Krishna Hari bol 👍🙏😀
@@harekrishna2291aabe ye spamming band bhi kar. Personal opinion kya hota hai tujhe pata bhi hai ki nahi? Ya tere maa baap ke saath saath teri buddhi aur samajh ka bhi ram ram satya ho gaya?
Detailed video on Karna. Specially about his donations
Yes Please, a detailed Video on Karna!
The whole video is awesome but Draupadi never said "Sutam na varyami". Yes, In Gita press edition this incident is there but there is a note mentioning that this incident might not have taken place according to the previous events happened during the Swayamvar.
No doubt your team has done tons of hardwork researching for this video but please refer to authentic sources for topics like this. I really appreciate the team's efforts and hardwork.
Lots of love and appreciation from my side 💖. Keep going 👍🏽
Karn Soot tha, Shudra nahi (Soot vo hote hai jinki Maa Brahman aur Pita Kshatriya hote hai aur ye dwij varn-sankar jaati hai).. plus Draupadi ne kabhi bhi Karn ko "shudra ya soot" kehke insult bhi nahi kiya aur dhanush se nishaana lagaane se mana bhi nahi ki kabhi.. infact Mahabharat book ke shlok me saaf likha hai ki vahan baither darshak kehte hai "Karn khud dhanush par pratyancha tak nahi chadha paya to nishana kya lagaata aur Karn nahi laga paya to ye Brahman (Arjun Brahman getup ne the) kya nishana lagaega" clear aata hai vahan.. is video me ye log Draupadi pe zyadatar baate sahi batai gayi hai par kuch jhuth bataya gaya hai, khud Mahabharat book padhlo tum khud bhi vohi kahoge jo hum sab keh rahe
@@pallavi.vaidik...... Ekdum sahi keh rahe ho aap👍🏽
According to the old manuscripts, Draupadi did allow Karna to participate, but he couldn't succeed.
Pahli Baat Hamen yah bhi Bhulna Nahin chahie ki vah ek Swayamvar tha aur Swayamvar Mein Rajkumari ko Apna mangetar chunne Ki Azadi thi
@@akashdhar9412 100% right 👍🏽
We need a detailed video on Karn plz!!!❤
Nepal se sab bhartiyo ko der sra prem😊❤🇳🇵🕉
We need a video on karna
Yes plz make a detail video on karn...detail mean detail ...A to Z everything about him...would appreciate 😮😮 Anyways, your content is Fab 👍
Agar padh na ata ha to ved vyas ji ki Mahabharat padho barna a log jhuth mangadant bakwas serial aur WhatsApp University ka agyan failayenge tum usiko satya manoge. Aur apna paisa mat barbad karo inn dharm dushak mulla o ke channel pe. Hare Krishna Hari bol 👍🙏😀
gita acharan namka channel me ved vyas ji ki sampurn Mahabharat ha usko sun sakte ho. Hare Krishna Hari bol 👍🙏😀
@@harekrishna2291jaa jake pogo dekh. Nahi karna humein kisi aur ke channel ko subscribe. Wo sala gita charan ne tujhe kitna paison ka lalach diya tha jo itna uske channel ko promote kar raha?
@@DeathStriker88 tu jake dekh pogo kiuki tu usika sada hua product ha. Tujh jaise bhikhari thodi na hu jo har chis paiso ke liye karunga? Hare Krishna Hari bol 👍🙏😀
Please make a video on Karna on fact not based on myth
जय माता द्रौपदी! 🤌🏻✨❤️
Ye bhi tumhari mata hai
@@WasimKhan-ww1lbbilkul hai, 1000 se zyada mandir hai Aadishakti Maa Draupadi aur Panch Pandav Mahadev ka southern India aur kai Northern me bhi hai, Kashi Vishwanath mandir ko Panch Pandav Mahadev bhi kehte hai jinke bagal me Draupadi maa mandir hai unke darshan karke hi Vishwanath ji ka darshan karne ka vidhan hai. Tum log ke nazar me Draupadi maa buri hai kyonki tum log ek ladki ko ek item ke tarah dekhte ho are behno bahuo tak ko nahi chordte, tum log ke hisab se ek ladki vo xx toy hai jiska ek hi malik ho, ek se zyada hue to vo r*ndi hui tum jahilo ke nazar me par humare yahan Charitra isse nahi aaka jata ki kitne sexual partners hai balki isse aaka jata hai ki vo duties kaise nibha rahi hai. Ek r*ndi agar 1 insan ki rakh@il bani rahe isse uski izzat nahi badhti kyonki r@khail kabhi duties nahi nibhaati bas istemaal karti hai us 1 mard ko bhi matlab saaf hai ki 1 mard hone na hone ka character se lena dena nahi. Sex ke sath responsibilities aati hai jo ek r*ndi nahi, ek patni nibhaati hai yahi fark hota hai dono me fir partner ek ho ya zyada lekin itni akkal tum log me hoti to tum log me to tum log ke behan/bahu bina duties nibhaaye bina permanently apnaaye dusre mardo ke timepass na banti halala/muttah ke naam pe
Jai Maa Draupadi
Karn Soot tha, Shudra nahi (Soot vo hote hai jinki Maa Brahman aur Pita Kshatriya hote hai aur ye dwij varn-sankar jaati hai).. plus Draupadi ne kabhi bhi Karn ko "shudra ya soot" kehke insult bhi nahi kiya aur dhanush se nishaana lagaane se mana bhi nahi ki kabhi.. infact Mahabharat book ke shlok me saaf likha hai ki vahan baither darshak kehte hai "Karn khud dhanush par pratyancha tak nahi chadha paya to nishana kya lagaata aur Karn nahi laga paya to ye Brahman (Arjun Brahman getup ne the) kya nishana lagaega" clear aata hai vahan.. is video me ye log Draupadi pe zyadatar baate sahi batai gayi hai par kuch jhuth bataya gaya hai, khud Mahabharat book padhlo tum khud bhi vohi kahoge jo hum sab keh rahe
@@WasimKhan-ww1lb Tumhare sab logo ke liye ek bhavishya vaani hai!
Under No Circumstances is it believable that KARN of all people suggested to disrobe Draupadi! Not a Chance.
I am really sorry but I am not getting the title of the video. Don't get me wrong, i loved the video and content of it. But how could it be titled as "draupadi loved karna?" I just feel it's very misleading. I do understand that you being a content creator want the title to be catchy and for sure it was catchy and gave you a lot of views. But someone might just see the title and assume that draupadi loved karna without watching the video. That's why I would request you guys to not make such a misleading titles and apart from that really love your content guys.
i also agree with you
Intresting video 👍
I like the details you provided but you missed the most important detail of why draupadi had 5 husbands.. there is a previous life story of draupadi due to which she gets 5 husband's in this life.. pls do more research on that story .. I know the story but cannot type here ..
How is the title related to the story !
very nice editing
yes we want a video on karn and by niharka mohan
@team RAAZ
We will! Thanks for the recommendation and for supporting us :)
Who want video on daan der karn
Yes, we want detail video on Karna!!
Love from Nepal🇳🇵
We need a detailed video on karna
Please make more vids like this
Drudapi is best ❤💯
Karn Soot tha, Shudra nahi (Soot vo hote hai jinki Maa Brahman aur Pita Kshatriya hote hai aur ye dwij varn-sankar jaati hai).. plus Draupadi ne kabhi bhi Karn ko "shudra ya soot" kehke insult bhi nahi kiya aur dhanush se nishaana lagaane se mana bhi nahi ki kabhi.. infact Mahabharat book ke shlok me saaf likha hai ki vahan baither darshak kehte hai "Karn khud dhanush par pratyancha tak nahi chadha paya to nishana kya lagaata aur Karn nahi laga paya to ye Brahman (Arjun Brahman getup ne the) kya nishana lagaega" clear aata hai vahan.. is video me ye log Draupadi pe zyadatar baate sahi batai gayi hai par kuch jhuth bataya gaya hai, khud Mahabharat book padhlo tum khud bhi vohi kahoge jo hum sab keh rahe
Karna himself called his charioteer as ‘son of charioteer’ means Sut Putra on 11th day when he first joined the battle after Bhisma’s Fall.
“Bring my victorious and golden standard, with the complexion of a lotus and bearing the marks of a victorious and healthy elephant. Have it cleaned with an excellent garment and decorate it with colourful garlands and nets. Bring swift and white horses that have the hue of the clouds. They should be well-fed and bathed in water from golden pots, and sanctified with mantras. They should possess golden harnesses. O son of a charioteer! Quickly. Quickly.”
Reference - Bibek Debroy (Tr.). The Mahabharata: Volume 5 . Penguin Books Ltd. Kindle Edition.
Duryodhana also addressed Karna as son of Suta -
“Duryodhana replied, ‘O Karna! I will do everything that you have thought of. O son of a suta! Chariots, with implements and horses, will follow you. There will be many carts, bearing iron arrows tufted with the feathers of vultures.”
Reference - Bibek Debroy. The Mahabharata: Volume 7 (p. 99). Penguin Books Ltd. Kindle Edition.
The point what we failed to understand that Duryodhana was in need of an archer and he believed Karna originally belongs to Kshatriya lineage and not in ‘Suta’ lineage and in fact in process he shamelessly compared a Suta mother with a doe!!
‘‘Bhargava imparted all his knowledge of dhanurveda to the great-souled Karna, tiger among men, having been extremely pleased with him. O king! Had Karna not been a deserving person, the descendant of the Bhrigu lineage would not have given him those celestial weapons. I therefore think that Karna cannot have been born in the lineage of a suta. I think that he is the son of a god, born in the lineage of kshatriyas. The maharatha is long in his arms and possessed earrings and armour. How can a doe give birth to such a tiger?”
Reference - Bibek Debroy. The Mahabharata: Volume 7 (pp. 115-116). Penguin Books Ltd. Kindle Edition.
In fact Duryodhana openly said the same thing in Rangabhoomi too in front of Karna but in the joy of becoming a Kshatriya (as kingdom of Anga bestowed by Duryodhana), he just ignored how badly Duryodhana compared a Suta mother with a doe.
It’s Sanjaya who used Son of Suta for Karna a number of times while narrating the story to King Dritarastra. While Dritarastra himself addressed Karna as son of Suta multiple times as well as Sanjaya as well.
So Son of Suta tag is used by many characters in Mahabharata.
If you don't know the facts don't tell stories draupadi was not the reason of war it was duryodhan himself and many other factors that lead to war check your facts first
hey creators i like your content but i think need some more research as far as i know draupadi not insulted karna it was his brother who told that stmt may be i am wrong
but great work raaaz team and we need kar video
information is very informative
Kaun kaun prani yah soch rakhta hai ki yah drushya star plus ke Mahabharata se uthakar aadhunik chayachitran ki sahayta se prastut kiya gaya hai.meri jigyasa ko khatam kr diya apne😢
Okay, I could hardly follow, did you/she answer why Draupadi was born ?
Just read Markhandai puran and Not novel Droupadi.
Philosophy is not your cup of tea madam
The biggest idiot in whole Mahabharata was Yudhister who participated in gambling. Worse is that he didn't made any effort to Draupadi.
Draupadi is my favorite❤
Mind-blowing
Yess Please Make Detail Video On Karna. We all really want to know.
In her earlier birth , Draupadi was unmarried and hence she performed a penance to Mahadeva. Mahadeva on being impressed came to her and offered her a boon. She repeated five times, that she wanted a husband endued with every accomplishment. Hence in her birth as Draupadi , she got five husbands in the form of Pandavas.
This was first told by Maharishi Ved Vyasa himself to Yudhisthira and he had told him that she would be their common wife(even before Draupadi’s Swayamwara).
"Vaisampayana said, 'While the illustrious Pandavas were living disguised in the abode of the Brahmana, Vyasa, the son of Satyavati, once went to see them. Those chastisers of foes, beholding him coming rose up and stepped onward to receive him. Saluting him reverentially and worshipping him also the Pandavas stood in silence with joined hands. Thus worshipped by them the sage became gratified. He asked them to be seated, and cheerfully addressing them said, 'Ye slayers of foes, are ye living in the path of virtue and according to the scriptures? Do ye worship the Brahmanas? Ye are not, I hope, backward in paying homage unto those that deserve your homage?' The illustrious Rishi, after this, spoke many words of virtuous import, and after discoursing upon many topics of great interest, he said, 'An illustrious Rishi, living in a certain hermitage, had a daughter of tender waist, fair lips, and fine eye-brows, and possessing every accomplishment. As a consequence of her own acts (in a past life) the fair maid became very unfortunate. Though chaste and beautiful, the damsel obtained not a husband. With a sorrowful heart she thereupon began to practise ascetic penances with the object of obtaining a husband. She soon gratified by her severe asceticism the god Sankara (Mahadeva), who became propitious unto her and said unto that illustrious damsel, 'Ask thou the boon thou desirest! Blest be thou! I am Sankara prepared to give thee what thou wilt ask.' Desirous of benefiting herself, the maid repeatedly said unto the supreme lord, 'O give me, a husband endued with every accomplishment.' Then Isana (Mahadeva), that foremost of all speakers, replied unto her, saying, 'O blessed one, thou shall have five husbands from among the Bharata princes.' Thus told, the maiden said unto the god who had given her that boon, 'O lord, I desire to have only one husband through thy grace.' The god then addressed her again and said these excellent words, 'Thou hast, O girl, said full five times, 'Give me (a) husband.' Thou shalt, therefore, in another life have five husbands!' Ye princes of Bharata's line, that damsel of celestial beauty hath
p. 344
been born in the line of Drupada. The faultless Krishna of Prishata's line hath been appointed to be the wife of you all. Ye mighty ones, go therefore, to the capital of the Panchalas and dwell ye there. There is no doubt that having obtained her as wife ye shall be very happy."
Source : KMG Mahabharata Adi Parva Chaitraratha Parva Section CLXXI
Detail Video On Karna ❤❤
You mean that bustard..
@@arjunkayal536 What Happened??
@@arjunkayal536 they r blind fans
Yes we want detailed video for karn's sins and with proofs in description
I am love your all videos 😊
I'm big fan of your raaaz community or membership lena ka mera sabse bada reason ek question hai.
Mam pandav ne droupadi ko 12 saal vanvas k bad apne 1 saal ke agyatvas me jita tha droupadi ke svamver me to jab chausar ka khel hua to vnha droupadi kese available thi chausar k khel k bad he to unko 12 saal ka vanvas or ek saal ka agyat vas k liye bola gaya tha?
Again Maharishi Vyasa told about this to Drupada after revealing that the Pandavas were Indras of old and Draupadi was Swargashri Sachi born to be their common wife of the Pandavas.
"The Rishi then cheerfully continued, 'In a certain hermitage there was an illustrious Rishi's daughter, who, though handsome and chaste, obtained not a husband. The maiden gratified, by severe ascetic penances, the god Sankara (Mahadeva). The lord Sankara, gratified at her penances, told her himself. 'Ask thou the boon thou desirest' Thus addressed, the maiden repeatedly said unto the boon-giving Supreme Lord, 'I desire to obtain a husband possessed of every accomplishment. Sankara, the chief of the gods, gratified with her, gave her the boon she asked, saying, 'Thou shall have, amiable maiden, five husbands.' The maiden, who had succeeded in gratifying the god, said again, 'O Sankara, I desire to have from thee only one husband possessed of every virtue?' The god of gods, well-pleased with her, spake again, saying, 'Thou hast, O maiden, addressed me five full times, repeating, 'Give me a husband.' Therefore, O amiable one, it shall even be as thou hast asked. Blessed be thou. All this, however, will happen in a future life of thine!'
"Vyasa continued, 'O Drupada, this thy daughter of celestial beauty is that maiden. Indeed, the faultless Krishna sprung from Prishata's race hath been pre-ordained to become the common wife of five husbands. The celestial Sri, having undergone severe ascetic penances, hath, for the sake of the Pandavas, had her birth as thy daughter, in the course of thy grand sacrifice. That handsome goddess, waited upon by all the celestials, as a consequence of her own acts becomes the (common) wife of five husbands. It is for this that the self-create had created her. Having listened to all this, O king Drupada, do what thou desirest."
Source : KMG Mahabharata Adi Parva Vaivahika Parva Section CLXLIX
Very interesting video
So who was draupadi's true love in Mahabharata
Arjun mainly. But she did love all Pandavas in a way.
I'm impressed of your fact research. Glad that you cleared the myth about Karna. He done many evil acts with Duryodhana. Now a days TV serials glorify karna so much that He was great and misunderstood. but actually he was not, He was a good warrior with evil heart. He done many ADHARMAS.
Good video 😮
incredible
•What are the top 10 false stories of Ramayana and Mahabharata that have changed their original portrayal completely?
•Misconceptions from mahabharat-
1)That karna was not a student of drona. He was very much a student of drona.
2)Parashurama taught only brahmins. This is false bhishma is not Brahmin he is kshatriya and parashurama shishya and also rukhmi and prince sarangdhwaja were his disciples.
3)That karna was a low caste. No suta is not low caste it is included in kshatriyas. Sutas are mixture of Brahmin and kshatriyas and they are included in kshatriyas .
4)Karna was rejected in draupadi swayamwar. This also is false as she never rejected him he failed in swayamwar test as his name is mentioned in list of Kings who failed and dhrishtayumna has stated that their is no restriction on any Varna only passing test is eligibility to marry draupadi.
5)Draupadi insulted duryodhana in mayasabha and called andhe ka putra andha. This is one of the biggest lie. She never insulted him infact draupadi was not even present in mayasabha during this incident.
6)Karna's kavach kundal is invincible. This is also biggest lie. He lost several battles with kavach kundals. And his kavach kundals were cut by him with normal sword.And he traded it with Indra for shakti not donated it.
7)Arjuna used pashupatastra on jayadratha. Again a lie. He used a sharp enchanted worshipped arrow to cut his head and then fired successive arrows to carry it in his father's lap.
8)Karna was killed unarmed. Again a lie and probably biggest in mahabharata due to which he gets sympathy. Karna was killed fair and square by Arjuna . Karna had Vijay bow in his hand when he was killed . His last act was countering arjuna's agneyastra with varunastra loft lifting chariot wheel. He was only chariotless not weaponless.
9)Bhishma was unarmed during his fall. Again a lie he was very much armed and attacking. Shikandi was in separate chariot and Arjuna was protecting him and bhishma was protected by dusshasana. Arjuna killed and defeated bhishmas protectors and then brought him down fair and square.
10)That gandhari blessed duryodhana with iron body and ashwathama is immortal. Both are misconception. Duryodhanas upper body was strong that is true but it has nothing to do with gandhari it was born strong as he was Kali purush and demons gave him power. And ashwathama is not immortal he was cursed to be alive only for 3000 years.
•Note: Most lies are for karna. There are more but as only 10 are asked so I concluded.
•Misconceptions about Ramayana.
1)Ravana didn't touch Mata sita and he was a women respecting man. Lie he was a serial rapist and he had raped his own daughter in law and several apsaras. So NalKuber had cursed him that if he forces himself on women's without her consent his head will burst into pieces.
2)Ravana was defeated by Vali and sahastrarjuna. As per valmiki ramayana uttara Kanda is interpolated and it's not a part of valmiki ramayana. And valmiki was first person to write ramayana so his is more authentic than others. So he was not defeated by then he never faced them.
3)Meghnada was best warrior . Again this is debatable and opinions vary people to people. I will share my opinion according to me he is not best it was Shri Rama. Meghanda was dependent heavily on illusions and tamasi Maya. His brahamahsra failed against Hanuman. He is illusion dependent warrior. I consider ravana and kumbhakarna stronger than him.Again it's my opinion.
4)Vali was killed unfairly . Misconception. He was killed in combat. Rama killed by hitting his chest not back and he gave Vali enough warning by making sound of his bow string.
5)Meghnada had all weapons of trimurti. Again I can't confirm this as I am yet to read full but from friends who confirmed this is not the case he didn't have all weapons of trimurti.
6)Vanaras used maces. None of the vanaras used maces. They used thier fists,boulders,stones. Only sugriva once used mace against nikumbha and Hanuman used sword once to kill demon trishara.
7)Meghnada used shakti to injure laskhman. This is I feel biggest lie and misconception which even I came to know recently.Actually he was injured by ravana by spear of brahma not meghnad.
8)Ravana gave lessons to lakshman on death bed. This is no true not mentioned in valmiki ramayana. Ravana was killed after week long battle by special Brahma baan and he was dead.
9)Ravana had Amrit in belly . No true as per valmiki ramayana.
10)Ram abandoned sita. Again not true as whole uttarkanda is not part of valmiki ramayana.Ramayana ends with coronation of Shri ram and saying he ruled 11,000 years and then departed to vaikuntha with brothers and Mata sita.
Jay shree Krishna ❤
Yes we need a detail video on karn
detailed video on Karna
Yes Sister, Please make video about Karan.
Let me tell she didnt make fun but a servant behind her said that line and doryodhan thought that draupadi said that
We want karn detailed video😊
Adhiratha and his lineage and his relation with Anga -
“brihat-darbha’s son is brihat-mana whose two wives are the princesses from chaidya province, namely lady yasho-devi and lady satya, owing to whom there occurred a twofold divergence of that dynasty... O king janamejaya, king jayadratha is born of lady yashodevi. And from lady satya is born the celebrated king vijaya, who by his equanimity of mind and other qualities is superior to the brahmana-s and by heroism and other accomplishments, is superior to the kshatriya-s... vijaya's son is dhriti whose son is dhrita-vrata. His son is the highly illustrious satya-karma... The son of satya-vrata through a brahmana lady is a suta - because of the rule: brahmanyam kshatriya jatah suta iti abhidhIyate - and this mighty chariot-warrior draws the suffix of ratha in his name from the very same dynasty of kshatriya-s with -ratha suffix, and he is called athi-ratha, who later adopted the son of lady kunti, namely karNa as his son. It is therefore karNa is called the son of a charioteer... the family of the highly powerful karna has thus been described. karna's son is vrisha-sena whose son is vrisha...[MNDutt, recast]”
[Ref - harivamsham 31]
Suta tribe was not a low caste as we usually think. They are actually a mixed caste originated from Kshatriya Father and Bramhin mother.
They were as Khatriya as others and had access to the teaching of Veda’s as well as other Khsatriya rituals. They used get trained in weaponry as well.
The above highlighted text clearly shows Adhiratha belongs to princely royal lineage.
But probably Adhiratha as person was a charioteer by profession and not a ruler and due to that Karna came to know as a son of Charioteer from Suta tribe.
Adhiratha belongs the dynasty of King Vijaya. Adhiratha’s father was Satya-vrata/Satya-karma and mother was a bramhin lady.
i absolutely love your videos
please add English subtitles
Please make a detailed video about Karn.
❤ your video's.
A detailed video on karna..please🙏🙏
Karna’s strength was not superior to Arjuna’s strength and the greatest proof is of Droupadi Svayamvar, where only Arjuna was able to strung the bow and shoot from the bow where warriors like Karna, Duryodhana, Bhagadatta, etc failed.
Citation :
"Then, one after another, those kings exhibited their valour for Krishna. But the bow was so strong that with all their strength, they could not string it. The firm wood of the bow recoiled and flung those brave rulers of men on the ground. They failed in their desire and could be seen on the ground, miserable and broken in spirit. That firm bow caused them pain and shattered their bracelets and earrings. Having lost hopes of obtaining Krishna, that assembly of kings was crestfallen. In that assembly, those kings who boasted of noble birth then became objects of derision. Kunti’s brave son Jishnu then arose, wishing to string the bow and place an arrow on it.’ Vaishampayana said, ‘When all the kings gave up attempting to string the bow, the great-souled Jishnu arose from among the Brahmanas."
Reference : Adi Parva Section Twelve Droupadi-svayamvara Parva Chapter 178 & 179
Karna didn't fail, he wasn't allowed to take part by Draupadi. and theres probably a reason why that happened because if karna was allowed to take part he might have actually completed the task we don't know.
@@daredevil2999Some passages from BORI’s critical edition and their meaning which proves whether Draupadi rejects Karna or not:
(1) ADI PARVA - SECTION 177:
धृष्टद्युम्न उवाच||
दुर्योधनो दुर्विषहो दुर्मुखो दुष्प्रधर्षणः |
विविंशतिर्विकर्णश्च सहो दुःशासनः समः ||१||
युयुत्सुर्वातवेगश्च भीमवेगधरस्तथा |
उग्रायुधो बलाकी च कनकायुर्विरोचनः ||२||
सुकुण्डलश्चित्रसेनः सुवर्चाः कनकध्वजः |
नन्दको बाहुशाली च कुण्डजो विकटस्तथा ||३||
एते चान्ये च बहवो धार्तराष्ट्रा महाबलाः |
कर्णेन सहिता वीरास्त्वदर्थं समुपागताः ||४||
As above highlighted, it is clear that Karna attends Draupadi’s Swayamvar along with other kings including Duryodhana, Durvisaha, Durmukha, etc.
This means that Karna is invited in the Swayamvar. It also indicates that Drupada (Draupadi’s father) does not consider Karna unqualified for the Swayamvar.
@@daredevil2999(2) ADI PARVA - SECTION 179:
वैशम्पायन उवाच||
यदा निवृत्ता राजानो धनुषः सज्यकर्मणि |
अथोदतिष्ठद्विप्राणां मध्याज्जिष्णुरुदारधीः ||१||
In this section, Vaishampayana says that Jishnu (or Arjuna) get up from the group of Brahmanas to take part in Draupadi’s Swayamvar when all the kings gave up and failed in the task.
Now section 177 says that Karna was among the participants (kings) & section 179 says that all the kings failed in the task. It clearly indicates that Karna also failed in the task as he is one of the kings.
Later on,
यत्कर्णशल्यप्रमुखैः पार्थिवैर्लोकविश्रुतैः |
नानतं बलवद्भिर्हि धनुर्वेदपरायणैः ||४||
तत्कथं त्वकृतास्त्रेण प्राणतो दुर्बलीयसा |
बटुमात्रेण शक्यं हि सज्यं कर्तुं धनुर्द्विजाः ||५||
It means that if kings like Karna and Shalya who are world famous and well versed in the Dhanur Vidya (archery skills) failed in the task, then how this weak Brahmin (referring to Arjuna) who has no knowledge of weapons succeed in the test?
The word for word Meaning:
यत = If
कर्ण = Karna
शल्य = Shalya
परमुखै : = foremost
पार्थिवै = King
लॊकविश्रुतैः = world famous
नानृतं = could not
बलवद्भिर = have great strength
धनुर्वेदा = archery
परायणैः = well versed
तत = that/ this
कथं = how
तव अकृतास्त्रेण = No knowledge of the weapon
पराणतॊ = succeed
दुर्बलीयसा = weakling
बटु मात्रेण = Brahmana
शक्यं = can
साज्यं कर्तु धनुर = string the bow
दवीजा: = O Brahmanas
If still in doubt, you can check the English meaning of Sanskrit words from here: spokensanskrit.org/
For all Adi Parva Shlokas, click here.
Conclusion - Whether Draupadi rejects Karna or not:
From the above discussion, we can conclude that Karna participated in Draupadi’s Swayamvar and failed in the task.
It further establishes the fact that if Karna failed in the task, then there is no point of Draupadi rejecting him saying that he is a Sutaputra.
Now again a question arises that if this is the case that why all the popular versions of Mahabharata & T.V. shows like the famous B.R. Chopra’s Mahabharat or its recent 2013 remake on Star Plus named Mahabharat sticks to the popular storyline?
One answer could be the mindset of the audience.
Our audience is familiar with the popular version of the story in which Draupadi rejects Karna. They do not want to mess with it for the sake of authenticity.
Another reason could be due to TRP (Television Rating Point).
Because if Draupadi does not reject Karna, then people do not sympathise with Karna. Also, there would be less drama which is bad for makers of the TV show as, without drama, it is very difficult to keep the audience engaged.
@@daredevil2999Vishnu Sitaram Sukthankar, General Editor of BORI disclosed that Draupadi’s rejection was found only in 6 out of 1259 Sanskrit manuscripts. The ones which contained the rejection were relatively newer and inserted evidently after the work of Vyasa (author of Mahabharata).
@@daredevil2999😂😂 another serial fan spotted , if you have read the Mahabharata then you would know that he was allowed but failed as he is not worth it