It's completely wrong, from the place to the way it fell. They gave full power, and tried to climb at the last moment, so the plane crashed tail first then right wing. That's most likely why 3 out of 4 survived. Also, it went a bit past the building you depict, and there was an apartment building, not a single family house. It literally striked a full on apartment building, albeit small and old, but an apartment building nonetheless.
This video is quite correct. At least if you believe the various video cameras that recorded the crash. It can be clearly seen that very shortly befor the crash the plane lifted its tail like crazy. There was not the slightest attempt at a go around and the nose dived. Had the pilots attempted a go around the nose would have lifted which it clearly did not.
@wkgurr there are a few videos that have sound in them. You can clearly hear he applied max throttle at the last moment, hence the plane lifting up. In any other case the stick shaker wouldn't have let him even lift the nose up... how do you think it lifts? Due to the ground effect? That requires level ground. If you think it was momentum, then he had like 2-3 knots of workspace to be able to lift it up, as this 737 stall at around 140kts, considering he had 45mins of fuel left and a ton load of DHL parcels.
@@ramama987 To me the video looks as if a gigantic fist lifted the plane by its tail and pushed it foreward and down. It's purely speculative, but if somebody told me that the pilot flying had a seizure at that moment which led him to violently push foreward the stick I wouldn't be surprised. There might also have been a mechanical malfunction of a very violent and sudden type affectig the elevators of the plane or - god forbid - an attempt by the pilot flying to crash the plane on purpose. A sudden exteme gust of wind is also a possibility but unlikely given the weather at the moment of the crash.
@wkgurr there is no need for such sarcasm. We're simply trying to understand what happened inductively as there isn't much evidence do go off of, unless you are the investigator. So speculation is inevitable here. I however have flown from EYVI many times, and did this exact approach, albeit in a DA40 which can land without it's flaps out. The airplane community here is now divided between three versions, either the flaps mechanism malfuncioned and showed him the wrong step, which he noticed to late. Or the VOR or instrument approach or high radio frequency receiver whatever you wanna call it. Which receives the localizer and glidescope frequencies was at fault. Or the third option is that the VOR at EYVI was at fault itself as some pilots have said that it sometimes might not "catch on" and literally guide you a mile or two front or aft of the touchdown.
@@Brobbs4549 not complaining, she’s right, but this is just a simulation but not very accurate. the plane also banked to the right upon impact according to this vid i saw from a park’s CCTV
I think it was 100% a stall, due to the fact that last recorded speed was made at the 600ft was around 150kt, which is stall speed of this specific aircraft type without payload.
Not even close, stall speed for a classic 737 with low weight and fully configured is most like 112kts. This looked like an incorrect altimeter setting.
@@superskullmasterYes, very likely as metar for that airport for that time was 1026 and in the aircraft it was probably still been set to 1013, there are no warnings in 73 classic that you're under your transition altitude and with dark outside, probably sleepy crew and chaos in the cockpit I think there are possibilities. Tho I still don't understand why that sudden increase in decent.
@@superskullmaster You haven't taken payload into a count, the payload of Boeing 737-400F may increase its stall speed. If the altimeter was the issue, then it would nosedive, but in original footage it wasn't, the descend was smooth enough with the nose facing the sky and speed on the stall stage can increase, which wasn't the case here, meaning that this stall was unrecoverable.
Russia told you what they planned on doing and you ignored them. They said they were going to pur incediaries onto cargo planes by shipping it This is what happened
Its wrong , the plane turned to a side and looks like nose is going up,there's a video of it on UA-cam
Wing clipped the ground
It's completely wrong, from the place to the way it fell. They gave full power, and tried to climb at the last moment, so the plane crashed tail first then right wing. That's most likely why 3 out of 4 survived. Also, it went a bit past the building you depict, and there was an apartment building, not a single family house. It literally striked a full on apartment building, albeit small and old, but an apartment building nonetheless.
This video is quite correct. At least if you believe the various video cameras that recorded the crash. It can be clearly seen that very shortly befor the crash the plane lifted its tail like crazy. There was not the slightest attempt at a go around and the nose dived. Had the pilots attempted a go around the nose would have lifted which it clearly did not.
@wkgurr there are a few videos that have sound in them. You can clearly hear he applied max throttle at the last moment, hence the plane lifting up. In any other case the stick shaker wouldn't have let him even lift the nose up... how do you think it lifts? Due to the ground effect? That requires level ground. If you think it was momentum, then he had like 2-3 knots of workspace to be able to lift it up, as this 737 stall at around 140kts, considering he had 45mins of fuel left and a ton load of DHL parcels.
@@ramama987 To me the video looks as if a gigantic fist lifted the plane by its tail and pushed it foreward and down. It's purely speculative, but if somebody told me that the pilot flying had a seizure at that moment which led him to violently push foreward the stick I wouldn't be surprised. There might also have been a mechanical malfunction of a very violent and sudden type affectig the elevators of the plane or - god forbid - an attempt by the pilot flying to crash the plane on purpose. A sudden exteme gust of wind is also a possibility but unlikely given the weather at the moment of the crash.
@wkgurr there is no need for such sarcasm. We're simply trying to understand what happened inductively as there isn't much evidence do go off of, unless you are the investigator. So speculation is inevitable here. I however have flown from EYVI many times, and did this exact approach, albeit in a DA40 which can land without it's flaps out. The airplane community here is now divided between three versions, either the flaps mechanism malfuncioned and showed him the wrong step, which he noticed to late. Or the VOR or instrument approach or high radio frequency receiver whatever you wanna call it. Which receives the localizer and glidescope frequencies was at fault. Or the third option is that the VOR at EYVI was at fault itself as some pilots have said that it sometimes might not "catch on" and literally guide you a mile or two front or aft of the touchdown.
@@ramama987 If you think my comments contain sarcasm you don't know what sarcasm is.
It was definitely still dark outside at the time
It doesn’t matter
Stop complaining
@@Brobbs4549 not complaining, she’s right, but this is just a simulation but not very accurate.
the plane also banked to the right upon impact according to this vid i saw from a park’s CCTV
this is absolutely not detailed video
I don't see any way this was terrorism, unless the whole airport instrumentation is compromised.
I think it was 100% a stall, due to the fact that last recorded speed was made at the 600ft was around 150kt, which is stall speed of this specific aircraft type without payload.
Not even close, stall speed for a classic 737 with low weight and fully configured is most like 112kts. This looked like an incorrect altimeter setting.
@@superskullmasterYes, very likely as metar for that airport for that time was 1026 and in the aircraft it was probably still been set to 1013, there are no warnings in 73 classic that you're under your transition altitude and with dark outside, probably sleepy crew and chaos in the cockpit I think there are possibilities. Tho I still don't understand why that sudden increase in decent.
@jirivnuk6303 maybe cargo shifted?
@@afxnxsjevs Not a bad guess, but I am not sure if plane was carrying cargo on that flight, but a good guess
@@superskullmaster You haven't taken payload into a count, the payload of Boeing 737-400F may increase its stall speed. If the altimeter was the issue, then it would nosedive, but in original footage it wasn't, the descend was smooth enough with the nose facing the sky and speed on the stall stage can increase, which wasn't the case here, meaning that this stall was unrecoverable.
Whats the game name?
The music is annoying...
Nothing real
How presumptuous.
Russia told you what they planned on doing and you ignored them.
They said they were going to pur incediaries onto cargo planes by shipping it
This is what happened
pls show link where russia tells that. not bbc tells that, not guardian, but russians themself. thnx
Proof?