Cool, tolles Video, richtig gut gemacht! 😃👍👍👍 Das Verrückte ist, daß ich die eine Treppe am Dom gar nicht kannte, obwohl ich keine 10 Minuten entfernt wohne! 😂🤭🤣
@@blackyraypatrick9041 Die meisten Aufnahmen erfolgten in Berlin um das sogenannte Humboldt-Forum herum (Schloßimitation). Die Treppen gehen zum Weg an der Spree runter, ebenfalls erfolgten Aufnahmen hinter dem Berliner Dom Richtung Hackescher Markt.
Not really true - "wheels as close to the boot as possible" is no longer on Combat frames. I have the Combat 260 for 4x80 wheels, and I was really surprised the wheelbase is moved by about 5mm lower to the boot mounting (comparing for e.g. to the Katana frame) - so increasing the "center of gravity"/standing height, which is now actually similar to a typical 165mm mount. The same I see here on 0:08 sec, where there is a large gap to the sole from the front and second wheel, like for a 100mm wheel (but it wont fit in length). I would really like to know for what reason Powerslide abandoned in these frames one of the Trinity key features. Extending the wheelbase in the length, there was a design need of extending the standing height? - but it cannot be said the wheels are still "as close to the boot as possible", as the grooved channel under the sole is now empty.
I see two reasons for that, but I might be wrong. The first is that those wheels, if originally 90mm, are now very worn down. They looks more like 80. The second thing is, being the wheels rockerable by the axel, they need a taller frame to accommodate 90 mm wheels in the upper position.
@@marcograndotto6615 That _could_ be true here, But I own the 260/4x80 model and I measured it in comparison to the Katana 243/4x80 I also own. And this is measured in the highest wheels position - the upper position you pointed, comparing to the same highest wheel position on the Katana frame (in which the front and back wheels are actually fixed on the 'upper' position, only the middle are rockerable down). I haven't measured the 4x90, but from what I see, I'm just assuming this is the same thing OR if the wheels here are much worn down, why they would forgot to scale down the frame in the height for the Combat 4x80 model? The only thing I thought was that on the Combat (i.e. length oversized) 4x80-260mm model, they could add additional (2) millimeters in height to allow mount of the 4x84 wheels. - And actually the 84mm could fit with no problem (even I just ordered additional wheel set to try 80-84-84-80 setup - as the middle wheels on rocker wear out very quick, so on this configuration - wheel rocker on 'flat' rocker axles - I will be able to extend the resulting rocker with the axles even over 2mm). But EVEN that - there would be still additional 3mm spare - which denies the 'lowest possible' Trinity philosophy, where they wanted to squeeze out every millimeter. Ok, maybe they had some reason (better for slides? or felt better for people used to 195mm mount?) but there is nowhere any information about such design change.
As you've probably figured out, yes, the 4x80mm, 260mm version actually fits 4x84mm. Although when the wheels are brand new, you gotta squeeze/push the middle ones through the lower support bridges. And when new, if you rocker a certain way, the wheels might rub those bridges a tiny bit.
@@mwrayknee In which position(s) will the 84s rub? I'm thinking of using this setup with the middle two wheels set to 2 or 4 pointing down and the front/rear set to 3 down, which should provide a 0.5mm rocker. I have like 3 sets of 84mm mpc/junk wheels already though... Thanks in advance!
@@tshook0912 I don't think that will cause an issue.. but.. You can always (for the first couple hours until wheels wear down a little, until you rotate your wheels for the first or second time) rocker the middle wheels down completely (so 0 down) and then rocker the toe and heel wheels based on that to achieve your desired rocker. Also, btw, you might want to buy some 10.35mm+ wide spacers. The stock spacers that came with mine were not wide enough.
This is really beautiful and inspiring!
So much fun to watch the rotational control and skill on display! and the cinematography is exceptional too!
i love this video, makes me wanna be this smooth
Unique skating, Cool!
That was smooth. Never seen a b-kick on inline skates 0:42 Great edit!
Beautiful!
❤❤❤
Mega cool 😎 ❤
Wonderful
I have combat80 frames and I’d like to know which setup is that one in the video, I mean the screws positions for roquering
Cool, tolles Video, richtig gut gemacht! 😃👍👍👍
Das Verrückte ist, daß ich die eine Treppe am Dom gar nicht kannte, obwohl ich keine 10 Minuten entfernt wohne! 😂🤭🤣
wo war das?
@@blackyraypatrick9041 Die meisten Aufnahmen erfolgten in Berlin um das sogenannte Humboldt-Forum herum (Schloßimitation).
Die Treppen gehen zum Weg an der Spree runter, ebenfalls erfolgten Aufnahmen hinter dem Berliner Dom Richtung Hackescher Markt.
🔥
Not really true - "wheels as close to the boot as possible" is no longer on Combat frames.
I have the Combat 260 for 4x80 wheels, and I was really surprised the wheelbase is moved by about 5mm lower to the boot mounting (comparing for e.g. to the Katana frame) - so increasing the "center of gravity"/standing height, which is now actually similar to a typical 165mm mount. The same I see here on 0:08 sec, where there is a large gap to the sole from the front and second wheel, like for a 100mm wheel (but it wont fit in length).
I would really like to know for what reason Powerslide abandoned in these frames one of the Trinity key features. Extending the wheelbase in the length, there was a design need of extending the standing height? - but it cannot be said the wheels are still "as close to the boot as possible", as the grooved channel under the sole is now empty.
I see two reasons for that, but I might be wrong.
The first is that those wheels, if originally 90mm, are now very worn down. They looks more like 80.
The second thing is, being the wheels rockerable by the axel, they need a taller frame to accommodate 90 mm wheels in the upper position.
@@marcograndotto6615 That _could_ be true here, But I own the 260/4x80 model and I measured it in comparison to the Katana 243/4x80 I also own. And this is measured in the highest wheels position - the upper position you pointed, comparing to the same highest wheel position on the Katana frame (in which the front and back wheels are actually fixed on the 'upper' position, only the middle are rockerable down). I haven't measured the 4x90, but from what I see, I'm just assuming this is the same thing OR if the wheels here are much worn down, why they would forgot to scale down the frame in the height for the Combat 4x80 model?
The only thing I thought was that on the Combat (i.e. length oversized) 4x80-260mm model, they could add additional (2) millimeters in height to allow mount of the 4x84 wheels. - And actually the 84mm could fit with no problem (even I just ordered additional wheel set to try 80-84-84-80 setup - as the middle wheels on rocker wear out very quick, so on this configuration - wheel rocker on 'flat' rocker axles - I will be able to extend the resulting rocker with the axles even over 2mm).
But EVEN that - there would be still additional 3mm spare - which denies the 'lowest possible' Trinity philosophy, where they wanted to squeeze out every millimeter. Ok, maybe they had some reason (better for slides? or felt better for people used to 195mm mount?) but there is nowhere any information about such design change.
As you've probably figured out, yes, the 4x80mm, 260mm version actually fits 4x84mm. Although when the wheels are brand new, you gotta squeeze/push the middle ones through the lower support bridges. And when new, if you rocker a certain way, the wheels might rub those bridges a tiny bit.
@@mwrayknee In which position(s) will the 84s rub? I'm thinking of using this setup with the middle two wheels set to 2 or 4 pointing down and the front/rear set to 3 down, which should provide a 0.5mm rocker. I have like 3 sets of 84mm mpc/junk wheels already though... Thanks in advance!
@@tshook0912 I don't think that will cause an issue.. but.. You can always (for the first couple hours until wheels wear down a little, until you rotate your wheels for the first or second time) rocker the middle wheels down completely (so 0 down) and then rocker the toe and heel wheels based on that to achieve your desired rocker.
Also, btw, you might want to buy some 10.35mm+ wide spacers. The stock spacers that came with mine were not wide enough.