That's impressive. I really wished Sony would put in a fully articulated screen on this camera with slightly better audio. It would be the ultimate run and gun camera beating any camcorder out there!
Thanks for sharing a great example! I have been playing with my newly received RX10 III and noticed a material improvement in image quality over the RX10 II for photos. In fact, the LCD screen also seems to be an upgrade and clearer/sharper, but the reviews online don't seem to mention any of this. Could you please let me know if you also notice this difference vs the prior M2?
check he zoom properly like i have ,clear zoom does not go to 1200mm,at max zoom it is less reach than my GH4 with my 100-400mm lens which with 2.5 x crop is 1000mm,i would put the RX100 111 around 950mm fully zoomed on clear zoom,do the tests.
+Jonathan Pontel You could spend $450 and get twice as close with the Sony DSC-HX400V. Here's a photo I shot with an earlier model of the camera: www.flickr.com/photos/andyfrombeaverton/27062115272/
+SpaceKitty depends of the needs. I already bought a lens for the a6300...wanted to buy the cam... also struggling! but do I really want to carry around multiple glas and still not reach the 300..600...1200mm... saying that shooting inside with kids.. may be an issue with the rx10... as 24 mm.. compared to 10,12mm (f2,f4 or even less) lenses... for the a6300...
Arabic language in the background :D cool thanks for the video , i own a Mark II " 6 months old " and i'm thinking .... oh my :D Mark III has way more reach
That's impressive. I really wished Sony would put in a fully articulated screen on this camera with slightly better audio. It would be the ultimate run and gun camera beating any camcorder out there!
that video looks really good that camera is the best wow
It's not a DSLR, such a niiice camera tho. But it would've been perfect if it had the same 83X optical zoom (2000mm lens) from the Nikon P9000
that is fucking crazy the moon is very detailed at fucking 1200!!!
Hand held......... Thats amazing
I just bought the same! Amazing camera!
Thanks for sharing a great example! I have been playing with my newly received RX10 III and noticed a material improvement in image quality over the RX10 II for photos. In fact, the LCD screen also seems to be an upgrade and clearer/sharper, but the reviews online don't seem to mention any of this. Could you please let me know if you also notice this difference vs the prior M2?
Still looks clear, impressive :-)
incredible!!!!
thats pretty amazing!
That really is amazing.
What would a pic look like at 1200mm?
or better to grab a 4K frame??
Impressive shot but I'm more impressed by the steady hand. At 1,200mm, I'd be lucky to keep it in the frame.
check he zoom properly like i have ,clear zoom does not go to 1200mm,at max zoom it is less reach than my GH4 with my 100-400mm lens which with 2.5 x crop is 1000mm,i would put the RX100 111 around 950mm fully zoomed on clear zoom,do the tests.
Please include some sample images in the full review!
Can the A6000 do this? Would there be a camera around $500 that would kind of be capable of this?
Spod Tek Canon sx60hs has a 65x zoom plus up to 4x digital zoom. It's only around $400. Only HD and no 4K.
how's slow motion?
Just WoW !!! I once did that with a Handycam......But 4K.....WOW
it's jaw-breaking!
so how much is it?
Wow... lol yeah that is a lot.
+Diego Diaz I'd get a nice computer or laptop with that money lol
Diego Diaz true
+Jonathan Pontel
You could spend $450 and get twice as close with the Sony DSC-HX400V. Here's a photo I shot with an earlier model of the camera: www.flickr.com/photos/andyfrombeaverton/27062115272/
AndyFromBeaverton $450 much better deal lol
I was about to buy the A6300 but not now !!!
+Raptor50aus A6300 is far better
+SpaceKitty depends of the needs. I already bought a lens for the a6300...wanted to buy the cam... also struggling! but do I really want to carry around multiple glas and still not reach the 300..600...1200mm... saying that shooting inside with kids.. may be an issue with the rx10... as 24 mm.. compared to 10,12mm (f2,f4 or even less) lenses... for the a6300...
Correct I will not get that reach with the A6300
Raptor50aus That's not true, go on amazon
+SpaceKitty so how much would the A6300 be with a lens that has the same reach??
I don't think it's actually expensive for what it offers ... 600mm at that level of quality is actually cheap at $1500
Arabic language in the background :D cool
thanks for the video , i own a Mark II " 6 months old " and i'm thinking .... oh my :D Mark III has way more reach
Amazing means P1000