63m /206ft Tour of Norwegian vessel being converted awesome Expedition/Explorer Yacht in 2024

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 чер 2024
  • See Matterport 3D of bridge and engine room here: my.matterport.com/show/?m=jHX...
    Main Description
    Survivor Class........FSV Class ‘A’ ERRV Year Built/Converted..............1992/2014
    Place of Build............Brattvaag, Norway
    Principal Dimensions
    Length o.a................................63.00m Length
    Capacities
    Freshwater.................................329m3 Fuel
    Cargo Deck Area..........................260m2
    Deck Cargo...........................350 tonne
    Cargo Pumps
    Machinery and Propulsion
    Main Engines.....................2 x 1840 kw
    Total.......................................3680 kw
    Main Propulsion Type.....Bergen Diesel
    Propellers...............................2 x CPP
    Azimuth Thruster.................1 x 736 kw
    Emergency Generator..........1 x 30 KVA
    Aux. el. Generator...............1 x 390 kw
    Shaft Generator...............2 x 1800 KVA
    Deck Equipment
    Hydr. Deck/Rescue Crane....1 x 3 tonne Cable
    Lifesaving and Rescue Equipment
    Daughter Craft....................2 x MP 1000 DC
    Davits............2 x Hydramarine G100
    FRC...............................1 x MP Woodo
    FRC Davit.............1 x Hydramarine A 32
    Deck Rescue Crane...........1 x 3T @ 12m Rescue
    Accommodation
    Total beds......................................18
    Single Berth...................................12 Twin Berth...
    An emergency response and rescue vessel (ERRV) needs combine good manoeuvrability, enhanced survivor reception and medical after-care facilities, state of art navigational/communications equipment and rescue craft capable of operating in severe weather.
    ERRVs are fitted with both daughter craft (DC) and fast rescue craft (FRC). In many respects the launch/recovery phases of both FRC and DC are limiting factors in respect of their use and especially the recovery operation requires a high degree of professionalism and teamwork between the craft’s crew and those operating the davit on board of the ERRV.
    In some cases the weather conditions are too severe to launch rescue craft, hence in such circumstances ERRVs with a mechanical recovery device are provided to recover survivors directly from the sea. The most common equipment is Dacon Scoop: a crane-operated rescue net for recovery of casualties directly from the water on board of a rescue vessel.
    This is Part 1 of a 2-part technical tour of a vessel. Part 2 deals with the engine room and the gigantic mud and cement tanks, that many of these vessels were built with when they operated as Offshore Supply Vessels (OSV's).
    The fast rescue vessels (Daughter Craft) website: maritime-partner.com/segments...
    Special thanks to:
    Master: Damien Reynolds
    Chief Officer Don Quinn
    and
    Atlantic Offshore (atlantic-offshore.no/)
    Xplorer Yachts specializes in the conversion of commercial and government vessels into global expedition yachts. We source our vessels directly from vessel owners in Europe and the U.S. and currently have over 50 vessels we are showing as 'available' for conversion. As 'Owners Rep' we assist in all aspects of the design, purchase of vessel, shipyard bidding and project management. We operate in Europe and the U.S. Direct contact: PM@XplorerYachts.com. More information regarding expedition yachts, go to XplorerYachts.com
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 36

  • @kennethalpvik7255
    @kennethalpvik7255 Місяць тому

    Thank you so much for your videos! 😃❤️👌🏻

  • @kennethmay9002
    @kennethmay9002 2 роки тому +3

    The most amazing example so far. Thank you.

  • @SAINT-ANTONIO
    @SAINT-ANTONIO 2 роки тому +3

    Looks perfect for a 1992 built ship and since then rough seas!

  • @lunamaria1048
    @lunamaria1048 10 місяців тому +1

    Norwegian ships are some of the best!

    • @ExpeditionYachts
      @ExpeditionYachts  10 місяців тому +1

      Absolutely. And they take superb care of their equipment.

    • @lunamaria1048
      @lunamaria1048 10 місяців тому

      @@ExpeditionYachts I'm Japanese and dated a guy that was Japanese, but born in Norway. He was in the Norwegian navy, so I got to see and be around many Norwegian vessels, and I was always VERY impressed!

  • @kieyamng5063
    @kieyamng5063 Рік тому +2

    So beautiful bro...

  • @basicnomad
    @basicnomad 2 роки тому +1

    Excellent video.

  • @johnwaga3702
    @johnwaga3702 2 роки тому +1

    Fascinating!

  • @assetstopurchase8432
    @assetstopurchase8432 2 роки тому +3

    If the navy wants to scrap the Independence Class littoral trimaran, then that is my perfect vessel. It is even based on a conceptual paradigm of mine from 2003, provided the consumption isn't over 100 GPH or if the turbines can be replaced with conventional engines and props.

  • @stradivarioushardhiantz5179
    @stradivarioushardhiantz5179 2 роки тому +2

    Great specs for an Exploration superyacht...start imagining a combination of: Ragnar x OceanXplorer
    ......let's pack her with; Lab+ Submersibles+ Amphibious vehicles/ Tenders+ Onboard hangar+ ROV crane+ Bespoke Statetoom

  • @LiveLifeLivTrucking
    @LiveLifeLivTrucking 2 роки тому +1

    Wowww...15 meter seas!

    • @kipdiddy23
      @kipdiddy23 2 роки тому +1

      Hey buddy, I'm gonna get one bout 150 -160 ft and make it all electric and solar watcha think? Have i lost my mind?😁

    • @ExpeditionYachts
      @ExpeditionYachts  2 роки тому +1

      You can do that if you don’t require a lot of speed. Think catamaran.

  • @ronaldobasilio-im9js
    @ronaldobasilio-im9js 8 місяців тому

    Ola, boa noite, só conheci seu canal ontem. Me chamo Ronaldo e falo do Brasil. Parabéns por vídeos tão fascinantes.

    • @ExpeditionYachts
      @ExpeditionYachts  8 місяців тому

      Obrigado, que bom que você gostou dos evideos

  • @largemarge1603
    @largemarge1603 Рік тому +1

    I allow the commercials to run while I read the comments.
    I hope this helps!

    • @ExpeditionYachts
      @ExpeditionYachts  Рік тому

      Actually, I'm trying to do away with those pesky commercials.

  • @sarge27271
    @sarge27271 2 роки тому

    I want one in Blue!

  • @jamwhenever
    @jamwhenever 6 місяців тому

    Did he say 100 gallons an hour, wow.

  • @bestvideos4ever1
    @bestvideos4ever1 Рік тому

    Dear please price. Kind Regards

  • @ceannscriteach81
    @ceannscriteach81 4 місяці тому

    Irish chief officer

  • @assetstopurchase8432
    @assetstopurchase8432 2 роки тому +2

    I want an expedition yacht. I've made the explicit statement, so that
    you doubt my intent.
    I'd, first, explain my rationale for it, and, subsequently, my needs,
    so we can modify the needs based on the rationale to modify the
    dimensions into a workable solution.
    As far as exploration is concerned, the Garcia 60 Exploration Yacht,
    with a centerboard, fulfills my needs for economic exploration, so I
    don't need another yacht for mere exploration.
    I, primarily, want the expedition yacht to be able to carry a helicopter
    and an amphibious vehicle, so I can explore the shores from yacht.
    Most important of all, I want to be able to preferably carry an
    amphibious aircraft and, if it is unable to do so, to at least refuel
    it.
    We all know that fears are irrational, but we still need them addressed
    for our peace-of-mind, regardless of how ludicrous they may sound, so
    let's not debate the irrationality of my fears, but, instead, work on
    decisively addressing them.
    My fear is that of sinking in the ocean, either because of a freak wave
    caused by an unexpected tsunami or by a storm that I'm unable to evade
    in time. I also don't want my expeditions to be captive to fair-weather
    or, for me, to not be able to access medical services in an emergency.
    This is where the rationale for an amphibious aircraft is my
    overarching concern.
    I've perused through all kinds of amphibious aircraft, but the only one
    that can land in the open sea is the Grumman Albatross whose length of
    63 feet turns into a problem because most economical vessels don't have
    such large beams.
    Unless, I can carry this peculiar aircraft, I'd rather not carry any
    aircraft at all because the others can either not handle open seas or,
    else, are single engine. If I can't carry it onboard, I'd still want it
    to be able to fly in to rescue me, for which I'd need to refuel it.
    Aside from this, I'd want the vessel to have twin engines, twin rudders,
    and a substantial draft to survive the worst sea-states. I don't want
    to break ice with it, but want to survive impact with floating ice and
    debris(containers).
    I'd want the saloon to be extravagant, the fly-bridge to be small( so as
    not to disturb the center-of-gravity in the event of a massive storm),
    the sun-deck and sky-lounge to be comfortable and( if possible, even
    extravagant), my office/library to double as a small hospital, my
    owner's suite to be luxurious, and the other 5 guest suites to be
    comfortable.
    I'd want it to not consume more than 60 to 100 GPH on a stable cruise,
    but I don't care how much it consumes in the event of a storm, so
    wouldn't mind backup power.
    I don't care if its diesel-electric or shaft-driven.
    I also don't care if it has an x-bow or a traditional flared bow, but I
    don't want an axe-bow vessel.
    Finally, I don't want it to be a White Elephant; I want to be able to charter it to earn an income and to also eventually sell it, so I'm willing to depart rom my own needs for a practical vessel. I want it be practical, like the Seawolf and Ithasca, so it lives on for hundreds of years and doesn't end up in a scrapyard because no buyer can afford to operate it.
    Here is a look at the Albatross:
    www.jpflyingservice.com/a-wandering-albatross/w

    • @largemarge1603
      @largemarge1603 Рік тому +2

      re -- tsunami
      As I understand the process, a tsunami is destructive near-shore and ashore.
      Off-shore, is a tsunami barely noticed as merely another in an endless series of waves?

  • @kipdiddy23
    @kipdiddy23 2 роки тому

    Wowww...400 dollars of gas an hour!

    • @ExpeditionYachts
      @ExpeditionYachts  2 роки тому

      That is when running at speed. Less burn than a large sportfishing yacht. On station engines are near idle. Also keep in mind that they transport up to 300 survivors.

    • @ExpeditionYachts
      @ExpeditionYachts  2 роки тому

      A Viking 50 convertible burns about 138 gph.

    • @kipdiddy23
      @kipdiddy23 2 роки тому

      @@ExpeditionYachts damn

    • @felixstangeland4679
      @felixstangeland4679 Рік тому

      in norway the gas price is 27 kr per liter, which is about 100 nok or 10 USD per gallon, making it 10206 nok or 1041 usd per hour.