@@PuffyCloud10 keep watching and commenting on islamic videos bro. Because of your interaction more and more people are seeing the videos. Thats why we the fastest growing religion❤️
@@murdogg bro i am muslim what are you talking about? I was replying to this guy who said repent because the guy who wrote the comment left christianity.
Why the debate around the age of Aisha(r), the Prophet’s wife, is irrelevant. *First Understand 4 things* : 1) How to study history? ✅Ibn Khaldun mentions something quite important which we must keep in mind, especially when discussing this “issue”: " A hidden pitfall in historiography is disregard for the fact that conditions within the nations and races change with the change of periods and the passing of days … The condition of the world and of nations, their customs and sects, does not persist in the same form or in a constant manner. There are differences according to days and periods, and changes from one condition to another. This is the case with individuals, times, and cities, and, in the same manner, it happens in connection with regions and districts, periods and dynasties. […] Analogical reasoning and comparison are well known to human nature. They are not safe from error. Together with forgetfulness and negligence, they sway man from his purpose and divert him from his goal. Often, someone who has learned a good deal of past history remains unaware of the changes that conditions have undergone. Without a moment’s hesitation, he applies his knowledge (of the present) to the historical information and measures the historical information by the things he has observed with his own eyes, although the difference between the two is great. Consequently, he falls into an abyss of error." ( Diwan al-Mubtada’ wa al-Khabr p. 24-26 ) 2) What is history? Early marriage is practiced all over the world, regardless of caste or creed. Historically there is no wonder in that. ✅"In fact, until the mid 1960s, the legal age of consent in Delaware was 7 (Kling, 1965: 216). So a 50 year old man could legally have sexual intercourse with a 7 year old boy or girl.” (Anthony Joseph Paul Cortese , Opposing Hate , page 85) ✅The 1921 census report shows the horror of the previous situation in India. According to it, 612 of the Hindu widows were under the age of one year. According to the census report, 2024 Hindu widows are under the age of five, 97,857 are under the age of ten and 3,32,024 are under the age of fifteen. (B.S. Nagi: Op.Cit, Page 2.) Just check this also : Girl-Brides and Socio-Legal Change: Age of Consent Bill (1891) Controversy. by Meera Kosambi. 3) Why so in history? ✅Neil Postman explains, that the modern concept of "childhood" is a recent social construct that did not exist before the 20th century: "In an oral world there is not much of a concept of an adult and, therefore, even less of a child. And that is why, in all the sources, one finds that in the Middle Ages *childhood ended at age seven.* Why seven? Because that is the age at which children have command over speech. They can say and understand what adults can say and understand. They are able to know all the secrets of the tongue, which are the only secrets they need to know. And this helps us to explain why the *Catholic Church designated age seven as the age at which one was assumed to know the difference between right and wrong, the age of reason.* It also helps us to explain why, until the seventeenth century, the words used to denote young males could refer to men of thirty, forty, or fifty, for there was no word-in French, German, or English-for a young male between the ages of seven and sixteen. The word child expressed kinship, not an age. But most of all, the oralism of the Middle Ages helps us to explain why there were no primary schools. For where biology determines communication competence, there is no need for such schools…The medieval way of learning is the way of the oralist; it occurs essentially through apprenticeship and service-what we would call “on-the-job training.” Such schools as existed were characterized by a “lack of gradation in the curricula according to the difficulty of the subject matter, the simultaneity with which subjects were taught, the mixing of the ages, and the liberty of the pupils.” If a medieval child got to school, he would have begun as late as age ten, probably later. He would have lived on his own in lodgings in the town, far from his family. It would have been common for him to find in his class adults of all ages, and he would not have perceived himself as different from them. He certainly would not have found any correspondence between the ages of students and what they studied." ( Dr. Neil Postman, The Disappearance of Childhood (1982) ) ✅Here is an important citation which explains how one can’t compare childhood and maturity of today to the past as mentioned Professor Mary Lewis: "No matter what period we are examining, childhood is more than a biological age, but a series of social and cultural events and experiences that make up a child’s life...The time at which these transitions take place varies from one culture to another, and has a bearing on the level of interaction children have with their environment, their exposure to disease and trauma, and their contribution to the economic status of their family and society. The Western view of childhood, where children do not commit violence and are asexual, has been challenged by studies of children that show them learning to use weapons or being depicted in sexual poses...What is clear is that *we cannot simply transpose our view of childhood directly onto the past.”* ( Mary Lewis, The Bioarchaeology of Children: Perspectives from Biological and Forensic Anthropology p. 4 ) 4) Those who say nonsense without knowing any of this are just idiots. Such people's arguments are just fallacies.There is no place for such nonsense in the academic world, social media idiots understand this. ✅Presentism-an anachronistic misinterpretation of history based on present-day circumstances that did not exist in the past. (David H. Fischer, Historians’ Fallacies: Toward a Logic of Historical Thought (New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1970), pp. 135-140.)
@@ShaburengsFor God so love Jesus the he saved him from the cross Some days having passed, Jesus having in spirit perceived the desire of the priests, ascended the Mount of Olives to pray. And having passed the whole night in prayer, in the morning Jesus praying said: 'OLord, I know that the scribes hate me, and the priests are minded to kill me, thy servant; therefore, Lord God almighty and merciful, in mercy hear the prayers of the servant, and save me from their snares, for thou art my salvation. Thou knowest, Lord, that I thy servant seek thee alone, O Lord, and speak thy word; for thy word is truth, which endureth for ever.' When Jesus had spoken these words, behold there came to him the angel Gabriel, saying: 'Fear not, O Jesus, for a thousand thousand who dwell above the heaven guard thy garments, and thou shalt not die till everything be fulfilled, and the world shall be near its end.' Jesus fell with his face to the ground, saying: 'O great Lord God, how great is thy mercy upon me, and what shall I give thee, Lord, for all that thou hast granted me?' The angel Gabriel answered: 'Arise, Jesus, and remember Abraham, who being willing to make sacrifice to God of his only-begotten son Ishmael, to fulfil the word of God, and the knife not being able to cut his son, at my word offered in sacrifice a sheep. Even so therefore shalt thou do, O Jesus, servant of God. Jesus answered: 'Willingly, but where shall I find the lamb, seeing I have no money, and it is not lawful to steal it?' Thereupon the angel Gabriel showed unto him a sheep, which Jesus offered in sacrifice, praising and blessing God, who is glorious for ever.
Ayesha (RA) was 6/ 7 years old when she herself accepted the marriage proposal of prophet Muhammad ﷺ brought by her Father Hazrat Abubakr. But she was already engaged with Zubair Ibn Mut'im. They broke the engagement. Then she actually got married After three years when Prophet Muhammad ﷺ migrated to Madina, then Aisha was 9/10 years old. Aisha رضي الله عنه was mentally capable, physically and biologically mature and martially abled. The jews and enemies of Prophet Muhammad ﷺ like Abu jahal, sheebah, Utbah bin Rabeeah, Abu Lahab etc never criticized his marriage. They could criticize his marriage like today's phobes do, but they knew that Hazrat Aisha was enough mature. Aisha said that she used to put her head on Prophet Muhammad's shoulders while hugging. She was also in the battlefield where children and old ones were not allowed. She was as teacher for women to teach them morals and Islam. She also narrated about 2210 Ahadiths. Even the highly knowledgeable and close companions of Prophet Muhammad acquired knowledge from her. She was always happy with her marriage as she herself accepted the proposal. She also said that she used to beat prophet Muhammad in race. She also led the Army in the Battle of Camels. Do you think a kid can do such things. Wallahi it's the phobic Heart which doesn't let a person accept the truth unless it opens up and get soften(Hatred-free).
And I would also add that all the others wives were widows and older than Aisha(RA). If RasulAllah (SAW) was really what these people say he was, would not make It sense for him to keep acting as they claim he was acting? These people are just shameful haters
However, other historical records, particularly those referencing her sister Asma bint Abu Bakr, suggest a different timeline. Asma is reported to have been 100 years old at the time of her death in 73 AH (after Hijra), making her 27 at the time of the Hijra in 622 CE. If Asma was 10 years older than Aisha, this would place Aisha’s age at around 17 or 18 at the time of the migration and possibly older at the time of consummation.
@@khadijahbegum3546 That is pure speculation and is very weak. These historical reports are already hotly contested and regarded to be unreliable. The consensus, and from the actual authentic sources cite that Aisha radiallahu anha was around 9/10.
Why the debate around the age of Aisha(r), the Prophet’s wife, is irrelevant. *First Understand 4 things* : 1) How to study history? ✅Ibn Khaldun mentions something quite important which we must keep in mind, especially when discussing this “issue”: " A hidden pitfall in historiography is disregard for the fact that conditions within the nations and races change with the change of periods and the passing of days … The condition of the world and of nations, their customs and sects, does not persist in the same form or in a constant manner. There are differences according to days and periods, and changes from one condition to another. This is the case with individuals, times, and cities, and, in the same manner, it happens in connection with regions and districts, periods and dynasties. […] Analogical reasoning and comparison are well known to human nature. They are not safe from error. Together with forgetfulness and negligence, they sway man from his purpose and divert him from his goal. Often, someone who has learned a good deal of past history remains unaware of the changes that conditions have undergone. Without a moment’s hesitation, he applies his knowledge (of the present) to the historical information and measures the historical information by the things he has observed with his own eyes, although the difference between the two is great. Consequently, he falls into an abyss of error." ( Diwan al-Mubtada’ wa al-Khabr p. 24-26 ) 2) What is history? Early marriage is practiced all over the world, regardless of caste or creed. Historically there is no wonder in that. ✅"In fact, until the mid 1960s, the legal age of consent in Delaware was 7 (Kling, 1965: 216). So a 50 year old man could legally have sexual intercourse with a 7 year old boy or girl.” (Anthony Joseph Paul Cortese , Opposing Hate , page 85) ✅The 1921 census report shows the horror of the previous situation in India. According to it, 612 of the Hindu widows were under the age of one year. According to the census report, 2024 Hindu widows are under the age of five, 97,857 are under the age of ten and 3,32,024 are under the age of fifteen. (B.S. Nagi: Op.Cit, Page 2.) Just check this also : Girl-Brides and Socio-Legal Change: Age of Consent Bill (1891) Controversy. by Meera Kosambi. 3) Why so in history? ✅Neil Postman explains, that the modern concept of "childhood" is a recent social construct that did not exist before the 20th century: "In an oral world there is not much of a concept of an adult and, therefore, even less of a child. And that is why, in all the sources, one finds that in the Middle Ages *childhood ended at age seven.* Why seven? Because that is the age at which children have command over speech. They can say and understand what adults can say and understand. They are able to know all the secrets of the tongue, which are the only secrets they need to know. And this helps us to explain why the *Catholic Church designated age seven as the age at which one was assumed to know the difference between right and wrong, the age of reason.* It also helps us to explain why, until the seventeenth century, the words used to denote young males could refer to men of thirty, forty, or fifty, for there was no word-in French, German, or English-for a young male between the ages of seven and sixteen. The word child expressed kinship, not an age. But most of all, the oralism of the Middle Ages helps us to explain why there were no primary schools. For where biology determines communication competence, there is no need for such schools…The medieval way of learning is the way of the oralist; it occurs essentially through apprenticeship and service-what we would call “on-the-job training.” Such schools as existed were characterized by a “lack of gradation in the curricula according to the difficulty of the subject matter, the simultaneity with which subjects were taught, the mixing of the ages, and the liberty of the pupils.” If a medieval child got to school, he would have begun as late as age ten, probably later. He would have lived on his own in lodgings in the town, far from his family. It would have been common for him to find in his class adults of all ages, and he would not have perceived himself as different from them. He certainly would not have found any correspondence between the ages of students and what they studied." ( Dr. Neil Postman, The Disappearance of Childhood (1982) ) ✅Here is an important citation which explains how one can’t compare childhood and maturity of today to the past as mentioned Professor Mary Lewis: "No matter what period we are examining, childhood is more than a biological age, but a series of social and cultural events and experiences that make up a child’s life...The time at which these transitions take place varies from one culture to another, and has a bearing on the level of interaction children have with their environment, their exposure to disease and trauma, and their contribution to the economic status of their family and society. The Western view of childhood, where children do not commit violence and are asexual, has been challenged by studies of children that show them learning to use weapons or being depicted in sexual poses...What is clear is that *we cannot simply transpose our view of childhood directly onto the past.”* ( Mary Lewis, The Bioarchaeology of Children: Perspectives from Biological and Forensic Anthropology p. 4 ) 4) Those who say nonsense without knowing any of this are just idiots. Such people's arguments are just fallacies.There is no place for such nonsense in the academic world, social media idiots understand this. ✅Presentism-an anachronistic misinterpretation of history based on present-day circumstances that did not exist in the past. (David H. Fischer, Historians’ Fallacies: Toward a Logic of Historical Thought (New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1970), pp. 135-140.)
Sam Shamoun has no peace in his life. He's been disowned by his family and the Church. "Only the one who hates you is truly cut off ˹from any goodness˺" Qur'an - Al-Kauthar (108:3)
Another way to put it would be trying to learn honesty from a liar. Better still, learning the secrets of a happy marriage from a convicted wife beater, whose wife cheated on him with one of his friends.
The former Christian Australian seems to have a huge ambition to discredit Islam even though he says he's a atheist, or believes in nothing in his words. Great video thankyou.
Breakdown : life expectancy in 600AD was 20-35 yrs old. marrying as young as possible was the problem solve, as People wanted to be able to raise their kids longer than 5 years! when a girl became physically and mentally mature, she was considered a grown adult. There is nothing wrong with the marriage of Prophet Muhammad s.a.w and Hazrat Aisha R.A for that time at the very least. the acustoms now have changed, presantism is what causes alot of non muslims a issue with this topic. Or the enemies of Islam just have nothing else to pick at, which shows just how solid Islam is.
During the medieval Islamic Caliphate, the average life expectancy in Arabia was over 35 years. Scholars and members of higher social classes may have lived to be 69-75 years old.
This argument against marrying young came up in the 1900s Because before that it was a custom around the world and they use to mature very early than us
@@Hitchens-k9sand now the United Arab Emirates (Dubai) is FULL of westeners for a better life, running from the rainbow train🏃🏻♂️🏃🏻♂️🏃🏻♂️ or does that point only go one way?
May Allah bless and reward Sheikh Uthman. The calmness he shows and mental strength. Many have benefitted from his videos. A warrior of Islam. May Allah give him jannah firdaus
This a Rollie not a stopwatch ⏱️ Sheikh Uthman don’t ever stop. MashaAllah. May Allah bless you and your team and reward you for your efforts. Islam will reach every corner of the earth. Everyone will hear the message of Islam. How important Dawah is. We should all do our part. May Allah reward you with the highest ranks of Jannah. Ameen.
9th Century Beatrice of Vermandois (aged about 10) was married to Robert, Margrave of Neustria (aged about 24; later King of West Francia), in c. 890 10th century Gisela of France (aged about 5) was married to the much older Rollo in 911. Gisela of Hungary (aged about 11) was married to Stephen I of Hungary (aged about 21) in 996. 12th century Cecile of France (aged 8/9) was married to Tancred, Prince of Galilee (aged 30/31), in late 1106. As he was dying in 1112, Tancred made Pons, Count of Tripoli, promise to marry her; Pons and Cecile were married later that year, when she was 14/15 and he was 13/14. Sibylla of Anjou (aged about 11) was married to William Clito (aged 20/21) in 1123. Matilda of England (aged 11), daughter of Henry II of England, was married to Henry the Lion (aged about 37/39) in 1168. Matilda of Boulogne (aged 9) was married to Henry I, Duke of Brabant (aged about 14), in 1179. Agnes of France was betrothed at age 8 and is reported to have been 9-years-old when she married Alexios II Komnenos (aged 10) in 1180. She was widowed in 1183 at the age of 12, and was then married to Andronicus Comnenus (aged 65); he died two years later.
I am 43 now. I was born in the caribbean and came to the United States and started learning about birthdays. I had no idea how old i was. I didn't know weeks, months, or years. Months later, i found out i was 11 years old. Before i knew my age, i was already chasing girls and grown women. I was a man working in the field with my grandparents, etc. I had to learn how to be a kid when i got up here. It felt like i was going backward in life. Let say i never fit in with the kids.
People should actually read what she said on her part instead of people victimiźeing her even tho she expressed joy and adulthood. May Allah guide the sincere ones to the truth and expose the corrupted souls, Ameen.
Why the debate around the age of Aisha(r), the Prophet’s wife, is irrelevant. *First Understand 4 things* : 1) How to study history? ✅Ibn Khaldun mentions something quite important which we must keep in mind, especially when discussing this “issue”: " A hidden pitfall in historiography is disregard for the fact that conditions within the nations and races change with the change of periods and the passing of days … The condition of the world and of nations, their customs and sects, does not persist in the same form or in a constant manner. There are differences according to days and periods, and changes from one condition to another. This is the case with individuals, times, and cities, and, in the same manner, it happens in connection with regions and districts, periods and dynasties. […] Analogical reasoning and comparison are well known to human nature. They are not safe from error. Together with forgetfulness and negligence, they sway man from his purpose and divert him from his goal. Often, someone who has learned a good deal of past history remains unaware of the changes that conditions have undergone. Without a moment’s hesitation, he applies his knowledge (of the present) to the historical information and measures the historical information by the things he has observed with his own eyes, although the difference between the two is great. Consequently, he falls into an abyss of error." ( Diwan al-Mubtada’ wa al-Khabr p. 24-26 ) 2) What is history? Early marriage is practiced all over the world, regardless of caste or creed. Historically there is no wonder in that. ✅"In fact, until the mid 1960s, the legal age of consent in Delaware was 7 (Kling, 1965: 216). So a 50 year old man could legally have sexual intercourse with a 7 year old boy or girl.” (Anthony Joseph Paul Cortese , Opposing Hate , page 85) ✅The 1921 census report shows the horror of the previous situation in India. According to it, 612 of the Hindu widows were under the age of one year. According to the census report, 2024 Hindu widows are under the age of five, 97,857 are under the age of ten and 3,32,024 are under the age of fifteen. (B.S. Nagi: Op.Cit, Page 2.) Just check this also : Girl-Brides and Socio-Legal Change: Age of Consent Bill (1891) Controversy. by Meera Kosambi. 3) Why so in history? ✅Neil Postman explains, that the modern concept of "childhood" is a recent social construct that did not exist before the 20th century: "In an oral world there is not much of a concept of an adult and, therefore, even less of a child. And that is why, in all the sources, one finds that in the Middle Ages *childhood ended at age seven.* Why seven? Because that is the age at which children have command over speech. They can say and understand what adults can say and understand. They are able to know all the secrets of the tongue, which are the only secrets they need to know. And this helps us to explain why the *Catholic Church designated age seven as the age at which one was assumed to know the difference between right and wrong, the age of reason.* It also helps us to explain why, until the seventeenth century, the words used to denote young males could refer to men of thirty, forty, or fifty, for there was no word-in French, German, or English-for a young male between the ages of seven and sixteen. The word child expressed kinship, not an age. But most of all, the oralism of the Middle Ages helps us to explain why there were no primary schools. For where biology determines communication competence, there is no need for such schools…The medieval way of learning is the way of the oralist; it occurs essentially through apprenticeship and service-what we would call “on-the-job training.” Such schools as existed were characterized by a “lack of gradation in the curricula according to the difficulty of the subject matter, the simultaneity with which subjects were taught, the mixing of the ages, and the liberty of the pupils.” If a medieval child got to school, he would have begun as late as age ten, probably later. He would have lived on his own in lodgings in the town, far from his family. It would have been common for him to find in his class adults of all ages, and he would not have perceived himself as different from them. He certainly would not have found any correspondence between the ages of students and what they studied." ( Dr. Neil Postman, The Disappearance of Childhood (1982) ) ✅Here is an important citation which explains how one can’t compare childhood and maturity of today to the past as mentioned Professor Mary Lewis: "No matter what period we are examining, childhood is more than a biological age, but a series of social and cultural events and experiences that make up a child’s life...The time at which these transitions take place varies from one culture to another, and has a bearing on the level of interaction children have with their environment, their exposure to disease and trauma, and their contribution to the economic status of their family and society. The Western view of childhood, where children do not commit violence and are asexual, has been challenged by studies of children that show them learning to use weapons or being depicted in sexual poses...What is clear is that *we cannot simply transpose our view of childhood directly onto the past.”* ( Mary Lewis, The Bioarchaeology of Children: Perspectives from Biological and Forensic Anthropology p. 4 ) 4) Those who say nonsense without knowing any of this are just idiots. Such people's arguments are just fallacies.There is no place for such nonsense in the academic world, social media idiots understand this. ✅Presentism-an anachronistic misinterpretation of history based on present-day circumstances that did not exist in the past. (David H. Fischer, Historians’ Fallacies: Toward a Logic of Historical Thought (New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1970), pp. 135-140.)
Something that I find funny is that, Muslims respects Jesus wholeheartedly, meanwhile some Christians, disrespect Jesus despite he's their God, I once saw people making jokes about Jesus goes go to a strip club, being a mecha robot, or what about people saying stuff like, "Jesus f* Christ"? I dunno about you but that's disrespectful and rude, saying an important figure's name alongside with a curse word. Peace be upon him.
@taqiyyan " Muslims respect Jesus more.." But for some reason He is more aligned with Christianity than Islam When Muslims testify of seeing Jesus in dreams they leave Islam & convert to Christianity If they already knew Jesus in Islam why would they leave
@AroundTheclock-iy3te My point is, no matter what our religion is, we shouldn't disrespect such important religion figure, tolerate and respect, yes? I still respect these people who left as I was never taught to hate or anything like that.
@taqiyyan ".. respect your belief..." It's not about respect I'm not looking for respect It's about a systematic problem within Islam that needs to be identified & addressed So sad Islamic scholar Yahya Cholil from Indonesia
fun fact : i've seen 10-15 years old girls way more mature psychologically than 18-20 girls, already taking care of family at their age. My grandma married at 14 and took care and educated 4 generations of people, going from sisters and brothers to grand grand children, which woman even of 30 years old can do that today ?
@@ArchlyHustle today it would be immoral, people are more and more immature, how ? societies world wild, in their process of evolution they striped people from a lot of their responsibilities since life is becoming easier than before.
BarakAllah fik! You're doing a excellent job out there! I was really amazed to see your attitude and behaviour. May Allah give you istakamat, sabr and blessings 🙌 ! Ameen
I spoke before listening to the entire video. Rush to judgment because they come like sheep but are wolves, the majority of the time. Its like they come with absolute intent to destroy Islam instead of learning. I still believe he came with intent to destroy and then learned the truth and was humbled in exiting.. Beautiful work, Brother.... The Sheikh to be so young with this much knowledge is crazy work like the young people say! 👊🏿
In our country, many girls are still getting married at the age of 15. In my mom's era, the typical marriage age was 9-12 years. Although the official minimum age for marriage is 18, at least 60% of people still disregard this law.
At 9:31 “yea he came to San Diego and run away from me” 😂 our Shaikh is telling the truth ☝🏼 I was there witnessed the entire lyrical beatdown… AlhamduliAllah
@@RickSanch3z thats fine but do you go to christians and start using their talking points to debate them? Probably not. Its best to research on your own and just use knowledgeable people as a guide
@@chr900 Yes, I would use Christian talking points if they’re logical, understandable, and backed by evidence. I do the same with Muslim points when debating Christians. It all depends on what we consider "knowledgeable" and how evidence supports it.
Muslim girls are more intellectual and more mature than western woman fact, ive lived in both sides back in my jahil and when i reverted back to the haqq, to be fair ive seen more young muslim boys more mature than most western men, well who claim to be men anyway.
Muslims really shouldn't be apologetic about the Age of Aisha or the Age of Marriage, I disagree with that approach. *"You surely cannot guide whoever you like ˹O Prophet˺, but it is Allah Who guides whoever He wills, and He knows best who are ˹fit to be˺ guided." (**28:56**)*
Alhamdulilah that Allah azzawajal has given such ability to our beloved brother Sheikh Uthman, Allah aukbar. May Allah reward him and have him in the highest rank of Jannah amin.
Alhumdulilah. Sheikh Uthman has the patience and knowledge to change minds of people and make them look a little bit deeper into the lies spread against Islam. May Allah reward and bless you in this life and the hereafter. Ameen
when the ustad said "the expectancy was 20-ish" i was like, oh yeah thats a very good point, people dont have good hygiene back then. very very good point there ustad. i never thought of connecting the dots loke that ❤
In England, the minimum marriageable age was raised to 16 in 1929. Before then, the minimum marriageable age was 12 for females and 14 for males. In 1971, the age of majority was lowered to 18 years old.
رضي الله عن أم المؤمنين عائشة ❤ يبغضها الشيعة و يستعملها اعداء الدين كحجة على الاسلام. اما المسلمون فيحبونها و يحترمونها ، لانها كانت امرأة عظيمة ، ابنة رجل عظيم ، و زوجة أعظم رجل في التاريخ❤
You know something. It is genuinely embarassing for these people that they look up to Sam Shamoun and David Wood. Look at them. How can you even take them seriously as MEN let alone sources of information? Their behaviour is appalling all they do is Ad Hominems and running
Comment Where You Watching From 👀👇🏼
For Boosting UA-cam Algorithm 📈🔥
Balboa Park, San Diego, California, USA 🇺🇸
@@OneMessageShorts Bilad ash-Sham 🇯🇴🏴
Sri Lanka
San Diego, California 🇺🇸
New York City 🇺🇸
As a ex-christian i have to say: thank you so much for your work!❤
Repent.
@icybarspitter45x40you should too
@@PuffyCloud10 keep watching and commenting on islamic videos bro. Because of your interaction more and more people are seeing the videos. Thats why we the fastest growing religion❤️
@@murdogg bro i am muslim what are you talking about? I was replying to this guy who said repent because the guy who wrote the comment left christianity.
@@PuffyCloud10 oh my bad brother 😂thought it was the other guy
Age of consent in 1880s in the state of Delaware, USA
"7 YEARS OLD" 👀
And thats JUST 144 years ago… now imagine 1400 years ago in the deserts of arabia.
CONVERSATION OVER!
Why the debate around the age of Aisha(r), the Prophet’s wife, is irrelevant.
*First Understand 4 things* :
1) How to study history?
✅Ibn Khaldun mentions something quite important which we must keep in mind, especially when discussing this “issue”:
" A hidden pitfall in historiography is disregard for the fact that conditions within the nations and races change with the change of periods and the passing of days … The condition of the world and of nations, their customs and sects, does not persist in the same form or in a constant manner. There are differences according to days and periods, and changes from one condition to another. This is the case with individuals, times, and cities, and, in the same manner, it happens in connection with regions and districts, periods and dynasties.
[…]
Analogical reasoning and comparison are well known to human nature. They are not safe from error. Together with forgetfulness and negligence, they sway man from his purpose and divert him from his goal. Often, someone who has learned a good deal of past history remains unaware of the changes that conditions have undergone. Without a moment’s hesitation, he applies his knowledge (of the present) to the historical information and measures the historical information by the things he has observed with his own eyes, although the difference between the two is great. Consequently, he falls into an abyss of error."
( Diwan al-Mubtada’ wa al-Khabr p. 24-26 )
2) What is history?
Early marriage is practiced all over the world, regardless of caste or creed.
Historically there is no wonder in that.
✅"In fact, until the mid 1960s, the legal age of consent in Delaware was 7 (Kling, 1965: 216). So a 50 year old man could legally have sexual intercourse with a 7 year old boy or girl.”
(Anthony Joseph Paul Cortese , Opposing Hate , page 85)
✅The 1921 census report shows the horror of the previous situation in India. According to it, 612 of the Hindu widows were under the age of one year. According to the census report, 2024 Hindu widows are under the age of five, 97,857 are under the age of ten and 3,32,024 are under the age of fifteen.
(B.S. Nagi: Op.Cit, Page 2.)
Just check this also :
Girl-Brides and Socio-Legal Change: Age of Consent Bill (1891) Controversy.
by Meera Kosambi.
3) Why so in history?
✅Neil Postman explains, that the modern concept of "childhood" is a recent social construct that did not exist before the 20th century:
"In an oral world there is not much of a concept of an adult and, therefore, even less of a child. And that is why, in all the sources, one finds that in the Middle Ages *childhood ended at age seven.* Why seven? Because that is the age at which children have command over speech. They can say and understand what adults can say and understand. They are able to know all the secrets of the tongue, which are the only secrets they need to know. And this helps us to explain why the *Catholic Church designated age seven as the age at which one was assumed to know the difference between right and wrong, the age of reason.*
It also helps us to explain why, until the seventeenth century, the words used to denote young males could refer to men of thirty, forty, or fifty, for there was no word-in French, German, or English-for a young male between the ages of seven and sixteen. The word child expressed kinship, not an age. But most of all, the oralism of the Middle Ages helps us to explain why there were no primary schools. For where biology determines communication competence, there is no need for such schools…The medieval way of learning is the way of the oralist; it occurs essentially through apprenticeship and service-what we would call “on-the-job training.” Such schools as existed were characterized by a “lack of gradation in the curricula according to the difficulty of the subject matter, the simultaneity with which subjects were taught, the mixing of the ages, and the liberty of the pupils.” If a medieval child got to school, he would have begun as late as age ten, probably later. He would have lived on his own in lodgings in the town, far from his family. It would have been common for him to find in his class adults of all ages, and he would not have perceived himself as different from them. He certainly would not have found any correspondence between the ages of students and what they studied."
( Dr. Neil Postman, The Disappearance of Childhood (1982) )
✅Here is an important citation which explains how one can’t compare childhood and maturity of today to the past as mentioned Professor Mary Lewis:
"No matter what period we are examining, childhood is more than a biological age, but a series of social and cultural events and experiences that make up a child’s life...The time at which these transitions take place varies from one culture to another, and has a bearing on the level of interaction children have with their environment, their exposure to disease and trauma, and their contribution to the economic status of their family and society. The Western view of childhood, where children do not commit violence and are asexual, has been challenged by studies of children that show them learning to use weapons or being depicted in sexual poses...What is clear is that *we cannot simply transpose our view of childhood directly onto the past.”*
( Mary Lewis, The Bioarchaeology of Children: Perspectives from Biological and Forensic Anthropology p. 4 )
4) Those who say nonsense without knowing any of this are just idiots.
Such people's arguments are just fallacies.There is no place for such nonsense in the academic world, social media idiots understand this.
✅Presentism-an anachronistic misinterpretation of history based on present-day circumstances that did not exist in the past.
(David H. Fischer, Historians’ Fallacies: Toward a Logic of Historical Thought (New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1970), pp. 135-140.)
Pedofilia
@@ShaburengsFor God so love Jesus the he saved him from the cross
Some days having passed, Jesus having in spirit perceived the desire of the priests, ascended the Mount of Olives to pray. And having passed the whole night in prayer, in the morning Jesus praying said: 'OLord, I know that the scribes hate me, and the priests are minded to kill me, thy servant; therefore, Lord God almighty and merciful, in mercy hear the prayers of the servant, and save me from their snares, for thou art my salvation. Thou knowest, Lord, that I thy servant seek thee alone, O Lord, and speak thy word; for thy word is truth, which endureth for ever.'
When Jesus had spoken these words, behold there came to him the angel Gabriel, saying: 'Fear not, O Jesus, for a thousand thousand who dwell above the heaven guard thy garments, and thou shalt not die till everything be fulfilled, and the world shall be near its end.'
Jesus fell with his face to the ground, saying: 'O great Lord God, how great is thy mercy upon me, and what shall I give thee, Lord, for all that thou hast granted me?' The angel Gabriel answered: 'Arise, Jesus, and remember
Abraham, who being willing to make sacrifice to God of his only-begotten son Ishmael, to fulfil the word of God, and the knife not being able to cut his son, at my word offered in sacrifice a sheep. Even so therefore shalt thou do, O Jesus, servant of God.
Jesus answered: 'Willingly, but where shall I find the lamb, seeing I have no money, and it is not lawful to steal it?'
Thereupon the angel Gabriel showed unto him a sheep, which Jesus offered in sacrifice, praising and blessing God, who is glorious for ever.
Ayesha (RA) was 6/ 7 years old when she herself accepted the marriage proposal of prophet Muhammad ﷺ brought by her Father Hazrat Abubakr. But she was already engaged with Zubair Ibn Mut'im. They broke the engagement. Then she actually got married After three years when Prophet Muhammad ﷺ migrated to Madina, then Aisha was 9/10 years old. Aisha رضي الله عنه was mentally capable, physically and biologically mature and martially abled. The jews and enemies of Prophet Muhammad ﷺ like Abu jahal, sheebah, Utbah bin Rabeeah, Abu Lahab etc never criticized his marriage. They could criticize his marriage like today's phobes do, but they knew that Hazrat Aisha was enough mature. Aisha said that she used to put her head on Prophet Muhammad's shoulders while hugging. She was also in the battlefield where children and old ones were not allowed. She was as teacher for women to teach them morals and Islam. She also narrated about 2210 Ahadiths. Even the highly knowledgeable and close companions of Prophet Muhammad acquired knowledge from her. She was always happy with her marriage as she herself accepted the proposal. She also said that she used to beat prophet Muhammad in race. She also led the Army in the Battle of Camels. Do you think a kid can do such things. Wallahi it's the phobic Heart which doesn't let a person accept the truth unless it opens up and get soften(Hatred-free).
And I would also add that all the others wives were widows and older than Aisha(RA). If RasulAllah (SAW) was really what these people say he was, would not make It sense for him to keep acting as they claim he was acting? These people are just shameful haters
Lets check now their history ,they will be like this 🏃🏃🏃🏃
However, other historical records, particularly those referencing her sister Asma bint Abu Bakr, suggest a different timeline. Asma is reported to have been 100 years old at the time of her death in 73 AH (after Hijra), making her 27 at the time of the Hijra in 622 CE. If Asma was 10 years older than Aisha, this would place Aisha’s age at around 17 or 18 at the time of the migration and possibly older at the time of consummation.
@@khadijahbegum3546 That is pure speculation and is very weak. These historical reports are already hotly contested and regarded to be unreliable. The consensus, and from the actual authentic sources cite that Aisha radiallahu anha was around 9/10.
Why the debate around the age of Aisha(r), the Prophet’s wife, is irrelevant.
*First Understand 4 things* :
1) How to study history?
✅Ibn Khaldun mentions something quite important which we must keep in mind, especially when discussing this “issue”:
" A hidden pitfall in historiography is disregard for the fact that conditions within the nations and races change with the change of periods and the passing of days … The condition of the world and of nations, their customs and sects, does not persist in the same form or in a constant manner. There are differences according to days and periods, and changes from one condition to another. This is the case with individuals, times, and cities, and, in the same manner, it happens in connection with regions and districts, periods and dynasties.
[…]
Analogical reasoning and comparison are well known to human nature. They are not safe from error. Together with forgetfulness and negligence, they sway man from his purpose and divert him from his goal. Often, someone who has learned a good deal of past history remains unaware of the changes that conditions have undergone. Without a moment’s hesitation, he applies his knowledge (of the present) to the historical information and measures the historical information by the things he has observed with his own eyes, although the difference between the two is great. Consequently, he falls into an abyss of error."
( Diwan al-Mubtada’ wa al-Khabr p. 24-26 )
2) What is history?
Early marriage is practiced all over the world, regardless of caste or creed.
Historically there is no wonder in that.
✅"In fact, until the mid 1960s, the legal age of consent in Delaware was 7 (Kling, 1965: 216). So a 50 year old man could legally have sexual intercourse with a 7 year old boy or girl.”
(Anthony Joseph Paul Cortese , Opposing Hate , page 85)
✅The 1921 census report shows the horror of the previous situation in India. According to it, 612 of the Hindu widows were under the age of one year. According to the census report, 2024 Hindu widows are under the age of five, 97,857 are under the age of ten and 3,32,024 are under the age of fifteen.
(B.S. Nagi: Op.Cit, Page 2.)
Just check this also :
Girl-Brides and Socio-Legal Change: Age of Consent Bill (1891) Controversy.
by Meera Kosambi.
3) Why so in history?
✅Neil Postman explains, that the modern concept of "childhood" is a recent social construct that did not exist before the 20th century:
"In an oral world there is not much of a concept of an adult and, therefore, even less of a child. And that is why, in all the sources, one finds that in the Middle Ages *childhood ended at age seven.* Why seven? Because that is the age at which children have command over speech. They can say and understand what adults can say and understand. They are able to know all the secrets of the tongue, which are the only secrets they need to know. And this helps us to explain why the *Catholic Church designated age seven as the age at which one was assumed to know the difference between right and wrong, the age of reason.*
It also helps us to explain why, until the seventeenth century, the words used to denote young males could refer to men of thirty, forty, or fifty, for there was no word-in French, German, or English-for a young male between the ages of seven and sixteen. The word child expressed kinship, not an age. But most of all, the oralism of the Middle Ages helps us to explain why there were no primary schools. For where biology determines communication competence, there is no need for such schools…The medieval way of learning is the way of the oralist; it occurs essentially through apprenticeship and service-what we would call “on-the-job training.” Such schools as existed were characterized by a “lack of gradation in the curricula according to the difficulty of the subject matter, the simultaneity with which subjects were taught, the mixing of the ages, and the liberty of the pupils.” If a medieval child got to school, he would have begun as late as age ten, probably later. He would have lived on his own in lodgings in the town, far from his family. It would have been common for him to find in his class adults of all ages, and he would not have perceived himself as different from them. He certainly would not have found any correspondence between the ages of students and what they studied."
( Dr. Neil Postman, The Disappearance of Childhood (1982) )
✅Here is an important citation which explains how one can’t compare childhood and maturity of today to the past as mentioned Professor Mary Lewis:
"No matter what period we are examining, childhood is more than a biological age, but a series of social and cultural events and experiences that make up a child’s life...The time at which these transitions take place varies from one culture to another, and has a bearing on the level of interaction children have with their environment, their exposure to disease and trauma, and their contribution to the economic status of their family and society. The Western view of childhood, where children do not commit violence and are asexual, has been challenged by studies of children that show them learning to use weapons or being depicted in sexual poses...What is clear is that *we cannot simply transpose our view of childhood directly onto the past.”*
( Mary Lewis, The Bioarchaeology of Children: Perspectives from Biological and Forensic Anthropology p. 4 )
4) Those who say nonsense without knowing any of this are just idiots.
Such people's arguments are just fallacies.There is no place for such nonsense in the academic world, social media idiots understand this.
✅Presentism-an anachronistic misinterpretation of history based on present-day circumstances that did not exist in the past.
(David H. Fischer, Historians’ Fallacies: Toward a Logic of Historical Thought (New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1970), pp. 135-140.)
Sam Shamoun has no peace in his life. He's been disowned by his family and the Church.
"Only the one who hates you is truly cut off ˹from any goodness˺"
Qur'an - Al-Kauthar (108:3)
what happened to him?
How you know that?
Bro don’t be spewing hate without knowledge like that.
@IsmailIsmail-py2xq he's talked about it on his streams. Called his wife a ****** who cheated on him with the mailman or something like that lol
@@PhillyPhilly1 lol that guy needs help bro, Im serious
Ooooffff, when he found out that Sam isn't who he thought he was !! His reaction was timeless.
Lol. I gues Sam earned more money by doing that than bcome a priest
Which timeline?
bought my first quran today ❤️
Alhamdulillah
❤
Mashallah, I suggest you listen to tafseer of the surah of the surahs alongside, it is very helpful 🌿
You were robbed you would have been better off with a copy of harry potter 😂
@ dude if think about money I can give you money he bought it not for story or something he wants find out the truth
Learning Islam from Sam is like learning how to fight from a doctor 😂
Correction, it’s like learning how to fight a doctor while you are sick and the doctor trying to help you 😂😂
Doctor ? Thats an insult for doctors ,at least Doctors they do good ,you should say Satan.
I know a dr who can fight! That was a bad example..
@@lifeisgood5698 Yeah but generally people don't go to doctors to fight, they seek out a coach
Another way to put it would be trying to learn honesty from a liar. Better still, learning the secrets of a happy marriage from a convicted wife beater, whose wife cheated on him with one of his friends.
Deuteronomy 17 has a death penalty for apostates that's pretty brutal.
paul apperently had the authority to abrogate the whole old testament
And It grants authority to anyone to enforce the penalty.
in Islam, Only the state has the authority to investigate, judge, and enforce the law.
It's disgusting!!
I'm curious - what makes it a death penalty?
@@yunogasai7283almost like your scholars and bukhari who abrogated parts of the Quran. Who gave them authority ?
The former Christian Australian seems to have a huge ambition to discredit Islam even though he says he's a atheist, or believes in nothing in his words. Great video thankyou.
Learning Islam from Sam is like learning about gravity by jumping off a cliff.
Faaacts 😂😂😂😂
From Jordan and Palestine, all respect to brother Uthman and his family and team. May Allah increase your knowledge and grant you wisdom.
His change from being jumpy to calm at end of video warms my heart
Thanks!
Alhamdullilah. Leaving a comment for the Algorithm. Salam Aleykum. 😁
Bro Graduated from David Woods University located in Sam Shamouns Basement/Bathroom 😂
This is the go to argument when they cannot criticize islam intellectually
Alhamdulilah for Islam May Allah swt continue to bless and protect you 🤲🇬🇲🇬🇲🇬🇲🇬🇲
I thought I was the only Gambia 🇬🇲 Muslim watching Uthman
@@KadimaFatty this channel is one of my favorite channels and I always comment, like and share
Ameen
Imagine your idol Sam shamoun running away from Shaykh Uthman 😂😂
Scam shamoun is really funny to be honest,never misses any opportunity to embarrass himself 😂
Imagine having respect for Sam Shamoun lol.. smh
Sam already sent a formal challenge to debate
Shrek uthman
But no answer
Masha Allah Sheik. May Allah give you the highest level in Jannah. Love from Sri Lanka 🇱🇰❤
Whenever you need security Sheikh, holla at me 🇭🇹😎💪🏾
Great work from Sk.Uthman to share a historical information with people they didn’t know anything about Islam except the errors facts..❤
Breakdown :
life expectancy in 600AD was 20-35 yrs old.
marrying as young as possible was the problem solve, as People wanted to be able to raise their kids longer than 5 years!
when a girl became physically and mentally mature, she was considered a grown adult.
There is nothing wrong with the marriage of Prophet Muhammad s.a.w and Hazrat Aisha R.A for that time at the very least.
the acustoms now have changed, presantism is what causes alot of non muslims a issue with this topic. Or the enemies of Islam just have nothing else to pick at, which shows just how solid Islam is.
During the medieval Islamic Caliphate, the average life expectancy in Arabia was over 35 years. Scholars and members of higher social classes may have lived to be 69-75 years old.
@stevenjones5277 hey look its steve jones from the pub trying to troll the enemy online lmao
Masha Allah! May Allah guide him, amin. Brother Uthman, you are the man. Watching from Northern California Bay Area.
Wow. That is logic, evidence, truth, common sense all combined 👏👏👏
This argument against marrying young came up in the 1900s
Because before that it was a custom around the world and they use to mature very early than us
Not 1900s. Maybe the last few decades 😂
Legends say Sam Shamoun is still running from Shaykh Uthman 😂
🏃♂️🏃♂️
@@noumannazir2360uthman ran frm pak to America to live a comfortable life which allla never gave him and millions of mslms in their own countries 😂😂😂
@@Hitchens-k9sand now the United Arab Emirates (Dubai) is FULL of westeners for a better life, running from the rainbow train🏃🏻♂️🏃🏻♂️🏃🏻♂️ or does that point only go one way?
@@Hitchens-k9swhat a silly comment lol
😂 you can count me me as a legend, akhee!
I see a new Sheikh Uthman video and I click! Simple 👌🏽🙌🏽
اعانك الله شيخنا عثمان و وفقك في نشر رسالة الاسلام
I'm from India keep going you are doing great work 🇮🇳 🇮🇳🇮🇳
I have learnt so much from you sheikh. May Allah reward you so much.
Still remember that Video when Sam ran from Uthman freshly upload at that time,
He left David Wood and That Other guy being massacred by Uthman.
TO BE CONTINUED 😭😭😭 SYAIKKHH HURRY UPP, IM WAITINGG
May Allah bless and reward Sheikh Uthman. The calmness he shows and mental strength. Many have benefitted from his videos. A warrior of Islam. May Allah give him jannah firdaus
He looks genuine and fair may Allah guide him and of us Aameen.
May Allah bless and reward you.
when they ask "how old was Aisha" dont tell them this and that, just ask them When was the first time the marriage was ever condemned by their own?
Meaning what?
@@qasimdin74381400 years ago Christian’s themselves didn’t object to the marriage.
Jazakum Allah Khayr.
Im not religious but this guy should have given Uthman more respect, why even come and ask questions if your not going to listen
This a Rollie not a stopwatch ⏱️ Sheikh Uthman don’t ever stop.
MashaAllah. May Allah bless you and your team and reward you for your efforts.
Islam will reach every corner of the earth. Everyone will hear the message of Islam.
How important Dawah is. We should all do our part.
May Allah reward you with the highest ranks of Jannah.
Ameen.
As an ex athiest thanks Sheikh Uthman❤️
9th Century
Beatrice of Vermandois (aged about 10) was married to Robert, Margrave of Neustria (aged about 24; later King of West Francia), in c. 890
10th century
Gisela of France (aged about 5) was married to the much older Rollo in 911.
Gisela of Hungary (aged about 11) was married to Stephen I of Hungary (aged about 21) in 996.
12th century
Cecile of France (aged 8/9) was married to Tancred, Prince of Galilee (aged 30/31), in late 1106. As he was dying in 1112, Tancred made Pons, Count of Tripoli, promise to marry her; Pons and Cecile were married later that year, when she was 14/15 and he was 13/14.
Sibylla of Anjou (aged about 11) was married to William Clito (aged 20/21) in 1123.
Matilda of England (aged 11), daughter of Henry II of England, was married to Henry the Lion (aged about 37/39) in 1168.
Matilda of Boulogne (aged 9) was married to Henry I, Duke of Brabant (aged about 14), in 1179.
Agnes of France was betrothed at age 8 and is reported to have been 9-years-old when she married Alexios II Komnenos (aged 10) in 1180. She was widowed in 1183 at the age of 12, and was then married to Andronicus Comnenus (aged 65); he died two years later.
I am 43 now. I was born in the caribbean and came to the United States and started learning about birthdays. I had no idea how old i was. I didn't know weeks, months, or years. Months later, i found out i was 11 years old. Before i knew my age, i was already chasing girls and grown women. I was a man working in the field with my grandparents, etc. I had to learn how to be a kid when i got up here. It felt like i was going backward in life. Let say i never fit in with the kids.
People should actually read what she said on her part instead of people victimiźeing her even tho she expressed joy and adulthood.
May Allah guide the sincere ones to the truth and expose the corrupted souls, Ameen.
Why the debate around the age of Aisha(r), the Prophet’s wife, is irrelevant.
*First Understand 4 things* :
1) How to study history?
✅Ibn Khaldun mentions something quite important which we must keep in mind, especially when discussing this “issue”:
" A hidden pitfall in historiography is disregard for the fact that conditions within the nations and races change with the change of periods and the passing of days … The condition of the world and of nations, their customs and sects, does not persist in the same form or in a constant manner. There are differences according to days and periods, and changes from one condition to another. This is the case with individuals, times, and cities, and, in the same manner, it happens in connection with regions and districts, periods and dynasties.
[…]
Analogical reasoning and comparison are well known to human nature. They are not safe from error. Together with forgetfulness and negligence, they sway man from his purpose and divert him from his goal. Often, someone who has learned a good deal of past history remains unaware of the changes that conditions have undergone. Without a moment’s hesitation, he applies his knowledge (of the present) to the historical information and measures the historical information by the things he has observed with his own eyes, although the difference between the two is great. Consequently, he falls into an abyss of error."
( Diwan al-Mubtada’ wa al-Khabr p. 24-26 )
2) What is history?
Early marriage is practiced all over the world, regardless of caste or creed.
Historically there is no wonder in that.
✅"In fact, until the mid 1960s, the legal age of consent in Delaware was 7 (Kling, 1965: 216). So a 50 year old man could legally have sexual intercourse with a 7 year old boy or girl.”
(Anthony Joseph Paul Cortese , Opposing Hate , page 85)
✅The 1921 census report shows the horror of the previous situation in India. According to it, 612 of the Hindu widows were under the age of one year. According to the census report, 2024 Hindu widows are under the age of five, 97,857 are under the age of ten and 3,32,024 are under the age of fifteen.
(B.S. Nagi: Op.Cit, Page 2.)
Just check this also :
Girl-Brides and Socio-Legal Change: Age of Consent Bill (1891) Controversy.
by Meera Kosambi.
3) Why so in history?
✅Neil Postman explains, that the modern concept of "childhood" is a recent social construct that did not exist before the 20th century:
"In an oral world there is not much of a concept of an adult and, therefore, even less of a child. And that is why, in all the sources, one finds that in the Middle Ages *childhood ended at age seven.* Why seven? Because that is the age at which children have command over speech. They can say and understand what adults can say and understand. They are able to know all the secrets of the tongue, which are the only secrets they need to know. And this helps us to explain why the *Catholic Church designated age seven as the age at which one was assumed to know the difference between right and wrong, the age of reason.*
It also helps us to explain why, until the seventeenth century, the words used to denote young males could refer to men of thirty, forty, or fifty, for there was no word-in French, German, or English-for a young male between the ages of seven and sixteen. The word child expressed kinship, not an age. But most of all, the oralism of the Middle Ages helps us to explain why there were no primary schools. For where biology determines communication competence, there is no need for such schools…The medieval way of learning is the way of the oralist; it occurs essentially through apprenticeship and service-what we would call “on-the-job training.” Such schools as existed were characterized by a “lack of gradation in the curricula according to the difficulty of the subject matter, the simultaneity with which subjects were taught, the mixing of the ages, and the liberty of the pupils.” If a medieval child got to school, he would have begun as late as age ten, probably later. He would have lived on his own in lodgings in the town, far from his family. It would have been common for him to find in his class adults of all ages, and he would not have perceived himself as different from them. He certainly would not have found any correspondence between the ages of students and what they studied."
( Dr. Neil Postman, The Disappearance of Childhood (1982) )
✅Here is an important citation which explains how one can’t compare childhood and maturity of today to the past as mentioned Professor Mary Lewis:
"No matter what period we are examining, childhood is more than a biological age, but a series of social and cultural events and experiences that make up a child’s life...The time at which these transitions take place varies from one culture to another, and has a bearing on the level of interaction children have with their environment, their exposure to disease and trauma, and their contribution to the economic status of their family and society. The Western view of childhood, where children do not commit violence and are asexual, has been challenged by studies of children that show them learning to use weapons or being depicted in sexual poses...What is clear is that *we cannot simply transpose our view of childhood directly onto the past.”*
( Mary Lewis, The Bioarchaeology of Children: Perspectives from Biological and Forensic Anthropology p. 4 )
4) Those who say nonsense without knowing any of this are just idiots.
Such people's arguments are just fallacies.There is no place for such nonsense in the academic world, social media idiots understand this.
✅Presentism-an anachronistic misinterpretation of history based on present-day circumstances that did not exist in the past.
(David H. Fischer, Historians’ Fallacies: Toward a Logic of Historical Thought (New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1970), pp. 135-140.)
Excellent response 🔥👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
You are doing a great job with the dawah brother. Very valuable facts for us to know.
Something that I find funny is that, Muslims respects Jesus wholeheartedly, meanwhile some Christians, disrespect Jesus despite he's their God, I once saw people making jokes about Jesus goes go to a strip club, being a mecha robot, or what about people saying stuff like, "Jesus f* Christ"? I dunno about you but that's disrespectful and rude, saying an important figure's name alongside with a curse word. Peace be upon him.
@taqiyyan " Muslims respect Jesus more.." But for some reason He is more aligned with Christianity than Islam
When Muslims testify of seeing Jesus in dreams they leave Islam & convert to Christianity
If they already knew Jesus in Islam why would they leave
@AroundTheclock-iy3te My point is, no matter what our religion is, we shouldn't disrespect such important religion figure, tolerate and respect, yes? I still respect these people who left as I was never taught to hate or anything like that.
@taqiyyan Jesus said who follows my commands are those who he accepts
@@AroundTheclock-iy3te Okay my friend, I respect your belief
@taqiyyan ".. respect your belief..." It's not about respect
I'm not looking for respect
It's about a systematic problem within Islam that needs to be identified & addressed
So sad Islamic scholar Yahya Cholil from Indonesia
fun fact : i've seen 10-15 years old girls way more mature psychologically than 18-20 girls, already taking care of family at their age. My grandma married at 14 and took care and educated 4 generations of people, going from sisters and brothers to grand grand children, which woman even of 30 years old can do that today ?
That's why you should go with the times
@@ArchlyHustle today it would be immoral, people are more and more immature, how ? societies world wild, in their process of evolution they striped people from a lot of their responsibilities since life is becoming easier than before.
This was brilliant ma sha allah, I look forward too part two
Sheikh SubhanAllah this explanation was so good, Allahumma Bareek, i have learned a lot today as well, May Allah reward you with Jannatul Firdaus
another lovely dawah video, thank you so much for the efforts syekh uthman and omf teams. inspire me to give small dawah to my friends ❤
When Christians try to criticize Islam, they always seem to forget just how similar Islam and Christianity are.
London is waiting for the continuation ❤❤
BarakAllah fik! You're doing a excellent job out there! I was really amazed to see your attitude and behaviour. May Allah give you istakamat, sabr and blessings 🙌 ! Ameen
Alhamdulillah, Masha Allah watching from Bangladesh
salaam from Kenya
Alhamdulillah. Germany
I spoke before listening to the entire video. Rush to judgment because they come like sheep but are wolves, the majority of the time. Its like they come with absolute intent to destroy Islam instead of learning. I still believe he came with intent to destroy and then learned the truth and was humbled in exiting.. Beautiful work, Brother.... The Sheikh to be so young with this much knowledge is crazy work like the young people say! 👊🏿
‘
Sheikh uthman is awesome 👍🏼
Bless him 🙏
Jazaka'Allah Khairan for answering these types of questions. May Allah bless you and all other people who're working in the path of Allah Ameen
uno reverse card!
masyaallah may Allah protect Sheikh Uthman
sending love from Malaysia
Subahanallah, jazakallah khair
This is why I’m Muslim ❤️ Alhamdulillah☝🏼
In our country, many girls are still getting married at the age of 15. In my mom's era, the typical marriage age was 9-12 years. Although the official minimum age for marriage is 18, at least 60% of people still disregard this law.
جزاك الله خيرا
16:15 "i really had a lot of respect for sam " - "yeee im sorry, sorry to dissapoint you" loool
At 9:31 “yea he came to San Diego and run away from me” 😂 our Shaikh is telling the truth ☝🏼 I was there witnessed the entire lyrical beatdown… AlhamduliAllah
May Allah bless you, my brother 🤍
Watching from Dubai, UAE 😊❤️
So hes not christian, but listening to shamoun videos?
Undercover Christian 😂
Barik will always look to ally against islam, no matter what their internal differences are.
I'm not Muslim, but I constantly listen to Muslim Lantern, Shaykh Uthman, Ali Dawah, and a few others
@@RickSanch3z thats fine but do you go to christians and start using their talking points to debate them? Probably not. Its best to research on your own and just use knowledgeable people as a guide
@@chr900 Yes, I would use Christian talking points if they’re logical, understandable, and backed by evidence. I do the same with Muslim points when debating Christians. It all depends on what we consider "knowledgeable" and how evidence supports it.
the patience of uthmann is crazy
JazakaAllah Kheir
We want more long videos 🔥🔥🔥
Muslim girls are more intellectual and more mature than western woman fact, ive lived in both sides back in my jahil and when i reverted back to the haqq, to be fair ive seen more young muslim boys more mature than most western men, well who claim to be men anyway.
Greatest human being to walk on earth Our beloved prophet Muhammad pbu ❤️
Muslims really shouldn't be apologetic about the Age of Aisha or the Age of Marriage, I disagree with that approach.
*"You surely cannot guide whoever you like ˹O Prophet˺, but it is Allah Who guides whoever He wills, and He knows best who are ˹fit to be˺ guided." (**28:56**)*
بارك الله فيكم
Make dua for this guy
Very interested.. ❤
جزاك الله خيرا اخي الكريم
Salam alaykum, Akhy I was really hoping to see how the conversation with him ended, in cha Allah please do post the rest of it. Jazak Allahu khairan.
Alhamdulilah that Allah azzawajal has given such ability to our beloved brother Sheikh Uthman, Allah aukbar. May Allah reward him and have him in the highest rank of Jannah amin.
Love from Pakistan ❤
JazakAllah Kheir
Alhumdulilah. Sheikh Uthman has the patience and knowledge to change minds of people and make them look a little bit deeper into the lies spread against Islam. May Allah reward and bless you in this life and the hereafter. Ameen
Thank you so much sheikh
Masha Allah. Sheikh Uthman is such an amazing Daa'e. May Allah preserve him. 💙
when the ustad said "the expectancy was 20-ish" i was like, oh yeah thats a very good point, people dont have good hygiene back then. very very good point there ustad. i never thought of connecting the dots loke that ❤
أحبك في الله يا شيخنا
In England, the minimum marriageable age was raised to 16 in 1929. Before then, the minimum marriageable age was 12 for females and 14 for males. In 1971, the age of majority was lowered to 18 years old.
Brotherly love from Europe sheikh Uthman 🤝🏻
W Shaykh Uthman 🔥
بارك الله فيك يا شيخ عثمان
إني أحبك في الله
أتمنى أن أصبح مثلك في يوم من الأيام
He's very excited and had energy may Allah guide him to the truth of Islam. Aameen
May Allah bless you guys and grant you peace and success in both lives for your good work, ameen. May an Allah accept your efforts ameen.
رضي الله عن أم المؤمنين عائشة ❤ يبغضها الشيعة و يستعملها اعداء الدين كحجة على الاسلام.
اما المسلمون فيحبونها و يحترمونها ، لانها كانت امرأة عظيمة ، ابنة رجل عظيم ، و زوجة أعظم رجل في التاريخ❤
Masha Allah
You know something. It is genuinely embarassing for these people that they look up to Sam Shamoun and David Wood. Look at them. How can you even take them seriously as MEN let alone sources of information? Their behaviour is appalling all they do is Ad Hominems and running
MashaAllah W sheikh uthman
Allah Humma Barik- May Allah Bless You