Sir Richard J. Evans - Writing the History of 19th-century Europe: the Global Context

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 31

  • @Gorboduc
    @Gorboduc 10 місяців тому +1

    I agree with the question asked about the incredible disappearing Austrian Empire. I was reading Tuchman's Guns Of August a while ago, and she starts the book with one chapter each summarizing the war aims of all the major powers...
    ...except for the guys who started it. :/

  • @Raantas
    @Raantas 2 роки тому +4

    31:13 A man of culture!

  • @themanofleisure7115
    @themanofleisure7115 6 років тому +18

    Evans starts at 8:30

  • @michaelbasher
    @michaelbasher 2 роки тому +1

    Really really interesting.

  • @AlbertSchram
    @AlbertSchram 2 роки тому

    [22:00] As to the "European family of nations", the badly conceived monarchic architecture at the Congress of Vienna, and the tremendous forces for social and economic change unleashed by technological innovation and the 1st Industrial Revolution at the same time, caused a continual occurrence of rebellions and revolutions before and after 1848. It is a story of conflict and competition between states, it was not and could not be a peaceful century. Margaret MacMillan's conception that the First World War was the war that ended peace, is in my view ludicrous.

    • @joshwhite3339
      @joshwhite3339 Рік тому +1

      I think when folks say "peaceful century" they mean that nothing occurred from 1815-1913 in Europe that resembled the Napoleonic wars, 7 years war, 30 years war, WW1, WW2 etc. I think the worst war that occurred during that time was an internal American Civil War.

    • @AlbertSchram
      @AlbertSchram Рік тому

      @@joshwhite3339 With lack of peacefulness I mean the Greek revolution, Belgian Independence, the 1848 revolutions, the Italian independence wars, the Franco German wars etc

  • @1schroef
    @1schroef 2 роки тому

    9/11?

  • @MikeDrewYT
    @MikeDrewYT 2 роки тому +2

    Who is this tedious introducer? She seems bored or annoyed at having to do it.
    Miss, if you don’t want to do this we can look all the information about “Richard” up ourselves.

  • @firstal3799
    @firstal3799 8 місяців тому

    Hate introductions. Irritating

  • @intolerandus
    @intolerandus 3 роки тому +1

    The most contemptible sellout in British history.

    • @bigboybole4358
      @bigboybole4358 3 роки тому +1

      okay thank you s easeß eztan we e are we asteswß we a eel we we rrß e

    • @althepalno1164
      @althepalno1164 3 роки тому +3

      So why is he so well regarded, and respected? Apart from whacky deniers, people regard him as an excellent historian. And a really good speaker too.

    • @slizzysluzzer
      @slizzysluzzer 3 роки тому

      Follow your leader

    • @Raantas
      @Raantas 3 роки тому +8

      He does this pretty well and I think if you hate a historian, you might hate history itself, too.

    • @slizzysluzzer
      @slizzysluzzer 3 роки тому +1

      @@Raantas He's a Holocaust denier, of course he hates history.