How Scientists Discovered Atoms?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 202

  • @attitude8268
    @attitude8268 10 місяців тому +34

    Informative breakdown by using 3D animation - concise, insightful, and beginner-friendly. Great job ❤

  • @x_x7670
    @x_x7670 9 місяців тому +8

    Very nice work 👍👍❤️
    Can I know the softwares used to make this videos animation please?

  • @mohansingh9800
    @mohansingh9800 10 місяців тому +7

    Very nice explanation 😊😊

  • @Atiqkhan-ti5gk
    @Atiqkhan-ti5gk 10 місяців тому +5

    Thanks alot!!!

  • @sandipshrisath077
    @sandipshrisath077 10 місяців тому +12

    The best atomic explanation ever and explanation got easier by 3d animation thanks information.

    • @nankerphelge3771
      @nankerphelge3771 28 днів тому

      The animations are great. The narration, like so many science videos, needs work.

  • @EBKEE_PRAVESH
    @EBKEE_PRAVESH 10 місяців тому +9

    The explanation level is amazing by using 3D animation 🫡

  • @منوعات-ث2س
    @منوعات-ث2س 10 місяців тому +10

    Hello my brother, your brother from Egypt. I follow you and thank you very much because you make me understand a lot about electrical physics, which is the basis of all sciences. Thank you very much. I hope to continue, and please do not put on music because it makes me distracted and I do not understand well.. Greetings.

  • @UnforgettableRider
    @UnforgettableRider 10 місяців тому +4

    1st view, like and comment ❤

    • @UnforgettableRider
      @UnforgettableRider 6 місяців тому

      @Dont-jy5ox no bro , the channel owner can show or hide the likes count in the setting

  • @ErenYeager-bf5ld
    @ErenYeager-bf5ld 10 місяців тому +4

    How are the subshells are present in atom ?

    • @Thescienceworks
      @Thescienceworks  10 місяців тому +5

      I will cover the concept of subshells in the next video

  • @williamhumphrey9766
    @williamhumphrey9766 3 місяці тому +98

    Stop using AI to voice over. It's bloody annoying.

    • @connormclaughlan8196
      @connormclaughlan8196 3 місяці тому +6

      Or please redo with a better voice generation. This ones flaws really hurt the mind while hearing it...

    • @HarryNicNicholas
      @HarryNicNicholas 3 місяці тому +3

      lol -you do realise you are talking to a robot?

    • @VideosViraisVirais-dc7nx
      @VideosViraisVirais-dc7nx 2 місяці тому

      I thought It was real

    • @volgg
      @volgg 2 місяці тому

      word....

  • @Rs_sharma07
    @Rs_sharma07 10 місяців тому +1

    Good work 🤟

  • @ajaychebbi
    @ajaychebbi Місяць тому +1

    Very nice animation!

  • @noneofthis69
    @noneofthis69 9 місяців тому +1

    BROTHER, PLEASE tell which website are you using for the VOICES.
    :

  • @Vikermajit
    @Vikermajit 2 місяці тому

    I am ignorant in physics and chemistry...I found this video to be very enlightening...a ray of hope...tq dear sir for the invaluable information you have so kindly shared.

  • @saranshyadav6347
    @saranshyadav6347 10 місяців тому +5

    Nice content❤
    Ac current please

  • @sharmadheeraj1509
    @sharmadheeraj1509 10 місяців тому +5

    Well explained bro 😉😉

  • @nmz61
    @nmz61 2 місяці тому

    Hi, great work! Thanks a lot, I hope you can continue this series as soon as possible 🙏

  • @roykay4709
    @roykay4709 2 місяці тому

    Thanks for this presentation. It did seem to take experimentation in increasing complexity to figure things out. Creating metrics really helped.

  • @bwhog
    @bwhog 2 місяці тому +3

    And in figuring out the electron, you also get the roots of the cathode ray tube and photo mask which make up the core of the basic television set.

  • @rajkumar.bshinde7067
    @rajkumar.bshinde7067 27 днів тому

    Make more such videos sir... Its a fantastic video in education

  • @lenburleson4875
    @lenburleson4875 2 місяці тому

    Now this is something that was never covered in high school or engineering college. Thank You. I would like to see part 2.

  • @physics_enthusiast_Soorya
    @physics_enthusiast_Soorya 3 місяці тому +2

    By the way, the image in 0:52 represent a set of images merged into one image. If you see the individual images (which might not be available on the social media, you need to explore it yourself after some degree), you can see 2 electrons filling each orbit at some random spot in the orbit.
    2nd mistake, at 0:52 again, the diameter of hydrogen atom(1 proton, and 1 electron) is 10^-10 meter, but the size shown in image should be bigger than that, since it's in the 3rd or 4th energy level
    The above comment is just for clarity.
    Love your animations! ❤️
    Keep it up ^^

  • @rishipalsingh6533
    @rishipalsingh6533 Місяць тому +7

    Your research is in complete you are not giving credit to maharishi kanad the great Indian Rishi ..

  • @HemantSingh-jg5ru
    @HemantSingh-jg5ru 10 місяців тому +1

    Nice 👍👍

  • @IvanToshkov
    @IvanToshkov 2 місяці тому +3

    The misconception that the thing that "atoms" are indivisible is not 2000 years old. The atoms proposed by Democritus and the atoms named by Dalton are two different things. The latter thought that he discovered indivisible particles and so he named them "atoms" as well. But they were talking about two very different things.
    For all we know, the philosophical idea of the atom is still true. There's the Planck length is the smallest unit of length. It cannot be divided into smaller lengths. This means that you can't divide matter indefinitely.

  • @robbie9629
    @robbie9629 2 місяці тому

    Great use of 3d modelling and animation.

  • @SageCog801-zl1ue
    @SageCog801-zl1ue 2 місяці тому

    Useful video.
    If J.J Thompson gets a mention the George Thompson must also.

  • @thesecretreviewer8242
    @thesecretreviewer8242 3 місяці тому +68

    This just another A.I. semi real but not quite right. Images are not correct.

    • @MrMuzza008
      @MrMuzza008 3 місяці тому +10

      I was thinking the same thing. There was something off about the voice and some wording. I will never give a like to an AI video. There should be full disclosure that a video about to be watched is created by AI (in which case I would not watch it).

    • @MikeWiest
      @MikeWiest 3 місяці тому +5

      Thank you. I hate the ai videos taking over

    • @davidvaughn817
      @davidvaughn817 2 місяці тому +4

      Thanks for the warning. Saved me six minutes.

    • @KarimY-119
      @KarimY-119 2 місяці тому +3

      its do sad how AI is destroying youtube and digital media. but play 5 seconds copyrighted music, then they wake up.

    • @davidvaughn817
      @davidvaughn817 2 місяці тому +2

      @@KarimY-119 Just my opinion, but it also is an indicator of how little governments (plural, as in "around the world") care about "us" (the everyday people). (Spoiler: It's "zero"). If they cared, there would be laws in place SPECIFICALLY requiring the labeling of any digital content generated artificially (whether by AI or simpler means) as such. I'm not saying OUTLAW it, just INFORM US. Yes, such laws would be hard to enforce, but so are drug trafficking laws. And, yes, it might seem silly to require "Artificial Content" on things like Toy Story, but I'd rather over-inform than under-inform. That's how you get things like -- just as one example -- the Harris "video".

  • @ahmedjomaa1
    @ahmedjomaa1 7 місяців тому

    Great job 👏

  • @AcademiaCS1
    @AcademiaCS1 Місяць тому +1

    Very good job on 3D show. I know it's a lot of hard work.

  • @freeb1111
    @freeb1111 19 днів тому

    Great video, can't find part 2?? thanks

  • @JKDVIPER
    @JKDVIPER Місяць тому

    These brilliant physicists.” ☺️🧠💯

  • @KozmykJ
    @KozmykJ 3 місяці тому

    Interesting explanation of the historical discoveries.

  • @sskprl
    @sskprl Місяць тому

    🎉Very good presentation.

  • @EnioPlowden
    @EnioPlowden 12 днів тому

    Thank you so much for this amazing video! A bit off-topic, but I wanted to ask: I have a SafePal wallet with USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). Could you explain how to move them to Binance?

  • @vickykhan9414
    @vickykhan9414 Місяць тому

    Sir how itom were found know and size wght how calculate please tell electronic configuration please all describe

  • @pggajendrababu1
    @pggajendrababu1 3 місяці тому

    Good animation. Good explanation.

  • @sharadvishwas1671
    @sharadvishwas1671 3 місяці тому +1

    Very Nice How atom distinguished from Imagination to Laboratory Practically Works. And there after uses of this technology in Cathode Ray Tube, X+ Ray invention, Home TVS etc. Vey Pratical model of atom with Good music for Videography 🎉❤❤❤

  • @myoccultreality
    @myoccultreality Місяць тому +1

    Thank to the Indian Maharshi Kanad.
    When the entire people credit the Western World for modern physics and its development, it is India’s own scientist “Sage Kanad”, otherwise known as “Acharya Kanad”, who should be highly revered and credited. He discovered the atomic structure, atomic theory, and even sub-atomic particles some 2600 years before. Kanad in Sanskrit denotes the smallest particle. He is revered as the “Father of Atomic Theory”. He has rendered Kanada Sutras, which are the Aphorisms of Kanada, which is considered as one of the greatest works in the field of physics. He is not only revered in Hinduism but also in Jainism and Buddhism, where his concepts are highly praised.

    • @ajayjangra8157
      @ajayjangra8157 Місяць тому +1

      Western countries, destroyed India (Bharat) and Indian knowledge.

  • @SDFNI3894YR
    @SDFNI3894YR 3 місяці тому

    amazing info and animation. thanks.

  • @dasarivamshi8084
    @dasarivamshi8084 8 місяців тому

    Please make the videos more and more

  • @philoso377
    @philoso377 5 місяців тому

    Nice video and presentation.
    Page 0:30
    Simply by atom alone there is none everything as we know it, unless we include a binding agent.
    What is that binding agent?
    That is electric field / force.
    There is no electric field unless vacuum is filled with a permittivity.
    What is that vacuum permittivity?
    If you will we can call it Aether.
    Aether is a fluid that has no mechanical but electrical peppery. It also attach to all matter in the near field and move together at one speed, on the other hand Aether drift at another speed departing from the nearest body or bodies by a factor of 1/r. In deep space Aether drift at a speed defined by the nearest bodies such as galaxies in the universe and by which is as close as a rest frame we can get.
    The detailed in near and far fields are undefined, do you want to try define?
    Aether attached to all matter is necessary in vacuum to enable electric field to assemble atoms and molecules, also require to couple electric energy into vacuum to make electric field, the binder (and enable light in vacuum). See also Maxwell equations we can find that e0 and u0 are attributes of Aether.

  • @xiaoyu5563
    @xiaoyu5563 2 місяці тому

    Quite interested in with which software this animation was made, Blender?

  • @Ashraful_ali1
    @Ashraful_ali1 Місяць тому

    Around 500 BC. A Indian philospher Maharishi Kannad also gave philosophy os Atom. He called atom as Parmanu in Indian language.

  • @tanzanos
    @tanzanos Місяць тому

    In Greek we also use the word atom when referring to people as people are also not divisible. Also Democritus was referring to the indivisible which means that what we call rhe atom is not what Democritus meant as the atom is divisible.

  • @FaresLoubar-j6v
    @FaresLoubar-j6v 6 днів тому

    ﴿ من يعمل مثقال ذرة خيرا يره ﴾

  • @georgethanos7700
    @georgethanos7700 Місяць тому

    5:55 Democritian atom IS INDIVISIBLE because the very first of Democritus' idea was that matter is not infinitelly divisible, which is true. The error is on Dalton, that named "atoms" particles that he THOUGHT indivisible at his time but later proved divisible. The Democritian atoma today are the six leptons and the six quarks (that they are thought to be indivisible). But, if someone manages to divide them, then the new atoma would be their fragments. Democritus idea is that someone arrives at a point that any further division is IMPOSSIBLE. And that, AS A CONCEPT, is true.

  • @dilipdas5777
    @dilipdas5777 3 місяці тому

    Actually ot was Indian Philosopher Konad who first proposed the concept of particulate nature of matter and that's why we call tiny particle Kona in Hindi ,Sanskrit, bengali languages

  • @mrintelligent6429
    @mrintelligent6429 Місяць тому +1

    It was first discovered by india 🇮🇳🇮🇳🕉

  • @ErenYeager-bf5ld
    @ErenYeager-bf5ld 10 місяців тому +1

    How subshells exits

  • @zygmuntbielawski946
    @zygmuntbielawski946 Місяць тому +1

    Check out " Paramanu" in vedic literature, long before the Greeks

  • @rayrocher6887
    @rayrocher6887 Місяць тому

    Thanks for the history lesson, and future of solving world troubles amen 💖

  • @venkybabu4842
    @venkybabu4842 Місяць тому

    People saw dust in air and inferenced other things. That's why they lead to find. You can always say when a particular atom was created.

  • @QuantaGaming-07
    @QuantaGaming-07 3 місяці тому

    Waiting for next part of this video ❤

  • @mmenjic
    @mmenjic 3 місяці тому +2

    so splitting the atoms is splitting the unsplittable, so infinity is not infinite and we are not alive at the end, we jjust look like we are.

    • @Delusions-CDLSM
      @Delusions-CDLSM 3 місяці тому

      Dude we are made up of cells and our cells are then made up of atoms

  • @petyrkowalski9887
    @petyrkowalski9887 11 днів тому +1

    Julius Plucker was a clever old……

    • @markl4593
      @markl4593 4 дні тому

      True, but just think about what they called his poor mother.

  • @JoseHambalos
    @JoseHambalos 3 місяці тому

    I appreciate your video ❤

  • @thealterego1777
    @thealterego1777 2 місяці тому

    It's the nucleus that revolves around the electrons based on relativity. For convenience, we consider the electrons to revolve around the nucleus. Can anions rotate around cations in a solution? I do not know the answer to that question.

  • @amelieamelie4469
    @amelieamelie4469 Місяць тому

    VERY good video

  • @horacioguillermobrizuela4295
    @horacioguillermobrizuela4295 3 місяці тому

    Nice images and animations, except for the misleading image of the electron as little satellites around the nucleus

  • @pepperpops6312
    @pepperpops6312 21 день тому

    true atom of greek philosopher is the molecule , thank you for your work btw

  • @malothujalapathi8133
    @malothujalapathi8133 8 місяців тому

    how do u animate bro plz tell me

  • @ssleddens
    @ssleddens 2 місяці тому

    My paycheck is smaller than an atom

  • @_ace_iat
    @_ace_iat 6 місяців тому +2

    Quality content ❤

  • @gogamer5659
    @gogamer5659 Місяць тому

    Want the second part 🙌

  • @vimalanathans499
    @vimalanathans499 3 місяці тому

    is the next video on this series released ? this seems to be 7 months old already !!!

  • @sd2564
    @sd2564 Місяць тому

    the smallest particle material, if you see photons then you also see atoms

  • @fightermentalityleading5618
    @fightermentalityleading5618 3 місяці тому

    Thank you sir 😊

  • @lok-aarpandreamhosing8977
    @lok-aarpandreamhosing8977 3 місяці тому

    Maharshi KANAD is the Indian Who firstly describe concept of Atom. Pls note

  • @pratapSingh-sl4ro
    @pratapSingh-sl4ro Місяць тому

    How to prepare New atum...& How it's identify it's a New atum .. ??? 2:05

  • @alggazteca
    @alggazteca 3 місяці тому +3

    Excellent video. Where is the next one?

  • @kvhp694
    @kvhp694 3 місяці тому +1

    Wooah ❤ loved it

  • @JohnBrodt
    @JohnBrodt 3 місяці тому

    In the year "nineteen zero four" hilarious lol

  • @darshangoswamidarshangoswa900
    @darshangoswamidarshangoswa900 5 місяців тому

    Pleseeeeeee make more video and plese also make in video of peltier module,thomson's effect pleseeee

  • @billbright1755
    @billbright1755 2 місяці тому

    Early type of ray gun.
    The primary principals remain unchanged in the most powerful modern ray gun theory.
    They smash objects into individual atoms.⚛️

  • @vishalkaushik2746
    @vishalkaushik2746 10 місяців тому +1

    💯⚠️

  • @SamZhao-v3y
    @SamZhao-v3y Місяць тому

    Uh, atoms are so...yesterday, everyone knows, what atoms are made of is so...in.😅😂

  • @ericlondon5731
    @ericlondon5731 3 місяці тому +19

    Is this an "A.I" voice ? ........."in nineteen , zero four" is how computers read "1904", and normal humans say " nineteen 'o' four ".

    • @robertobradford3968
      @robertobradford3968 3 місяці тому +2

      Yeah, the AI voice doesn't read things correctly. DEM-oh-cry-tus instead of de-MAW-cri-tus, va-KOOM instead of VAH-kyum...

    • @angelus_solus
      @angelus_solus 3 місяці тому +2

      The way humans read it is stupid anyway. O is not a number and there are no letters in 1904. It should be rightly said as either nineteen four, or nineteen hundred four.

    • @ItsHimItsThatGuy
      @ItsHimItsThatGuy 3 місяці тому

      @@angelus_solus ‘o is not a number, but it is the last letter of the word “Zero”

    • @angelus_solus
      @angelus_solus 3 місяці тому

      @@ItsHimItsThatGuy LMFAO! Really? You're going to use a particle of a word as evidence in some pathetic attempt to discredit me?! Just go away, imbecile. No one says "zero" when saying a year anyway. Never have, never will.

  • @thesaneparty4079
    @thesaneparty4079 2 місяці тому

    "A point comes when we can no longer able to"-
    Written by an H1B visa

  • @ছবিঘর-থ৮ষ
    @ছবিঘর-থ৮ষ 6 місяців тому

    Next please

  • @kanhaiyalalrajput3215
    @kanhaiyalalrajput3215 Місяць тому

    Waiting for part 2

  • @MihretuGetaneh
    @MihretuGetaneh Місяць тому

    thank you

  • @Yusuketh443
    @Yusuketh443 9 місяців тому +1

    hi :3

  • @হাট্টিমাটিমটিম-ণ৩প

    Hello sir
    I love your videos very much 😊
    I also wanted to start a UA-cam channel of scientific explanation,
    But i can't make animation video, i want to make animation like yours,
    Plz help me, plz tell me what software you use,and give me some instructions so that I can make video like you.😊😊
    Plz,plz,plz, plz plz plz plz plz plz, plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz plz

  • @divyeshkhimasia7052
    @divyeshkhimasia7052 3 місяці тому +1

    Where is the next video?

  • @riyazkhan-i1r6f
    @riyazkhan-i1r6f Місяць тому +1

    ATOMS; IRON ONLY OK, CHECK PLEASE

  • @ananthchandra7792
    @ananthchandra7792 25 днів тому

    Most of the All known or unknown Scientific theories or techniques are interlinked or interconnect to each other, through mathematics or logical relations , we can find answers or solutions to our questions in entire universe or multiverse,but our human intelligence is not capable to achieve that things,so till some mysteries are unsolved.but we have hope to resolve.

  • @ScienceZooms
    @ScienceZooms Місяць тому

    Hi there
    May we discuss something?

  • @EnergyTRE
    @EnergyTRE 2 місяці тому

    You left out the actual scientist. They did have a atomistic/ materialistic views. To quote the great Nikola Tesla if you want to understand the secrets of the universe think in frequencies and the Æther

    • @EnergyTRE
      @EnergyTRE 2 місяці тому

      No electron has ever been recorded in history

  • @AKG58Z
    @AKG58Z 6 місяців тому

    So we can see electrons which are smaller but not atoms.

  • @CarloMilanesi
    @CarloMilanesi 2 місяці тому +2

    Why do you not pronounce the "t" of "atom", but you pronounce the "t" of "time" or of "atomic"? If I use Google Translator I can clearly hear the "t" in "atom".

    • @SMS-
      @SMS- 2 місяці тому +2

      Maybe he dont know how to pronounce it.

  • @GereDJ2
    @GereDJ2 3 місяці тому +1

    Hats off to the glass blowers of the day for producing such specific shapes and sizes for these mad scientists, lol.

    • @Delusions-CDLSM
      @Delusions-CDLSM 3 місяці тому +1

      They are definitely smarter than you.

    • @GereDJ2
      @GereDJ2 3 місяці тому

      @@Delusions-CDLSM Unfair supposition.

  • @uriituw
    @uriituw 3 місяці тому

    How? How indeed.

  • @Eye_Exist
    @Eye_Exist 3 місяці тому +1

    Atom is not the _atomos_ the greek philosophers proposed, and we didn't discover their proposal was in fact dividable. this is utter upside down nonsense. they proposed an atomos, an undivided primordial particle everything is made of, and then two millenia later we discovered a particle that we thought couldn't be divided and wrongly named it as atom based on the greek philosophical concept, only later to be proven wrong by ourselves that it in fact can still be divided into many smaller particles.

  • @IOANCHRIST-GODSTEF
    @IOANCHRIST-GODSTEF 2 місяці тому

    OT
    Should be Named
    ATOMS!

  • @robkb4559
    @robkb4559 3 місяці тому

    Nice video, but did you mean "How Scientists Discovered Atoms", or "How Did Scientists Discover Atoms?"

  • @Sittin.
    @Sittin. 2 місяці тому

    Yeah,,, but what are atoms made of?

    • @sissyw3
      @sissyw3 2 місяці тому

      Element is made up of atoms and atoms are made up of electrons, neutrons and protons

  • @bluegizmo1983
    @bluegizmo1983 3 місяці тому +4

    Stop using AI voiceovers for your videos!! 🤬

  • @engrsohrab7079
    @engrsohrab7079 4 місяці тому +1

    next video ?

  • @Predatorial1
    @Predatorial1 2 місяці тому

    Title is misleading. They didn't discover atoms, they confirmed their existence.

    • @Priya-x9o6s
      @Priya-x9o6s Місяць тому

      If the title is how scientist invented atoms? Then your comment is legitimate

    • @Predatorial1
      @Predatorial1 Місяць тому

      @@Priya-x9o6s We'd known about atoms for centuries, millennia even...we just needed proof of their existence. Just as Einstein theorized about Relativity. You wouldn't say Einstein's provers discovered Relativity, would you? No, you'd say they proved it.

    • @Priya-x9o6s
      @Priya-x9o6s Місяць тому

      @@Predatorial1 what is difference between discovering,inventing and confriming the existence

    • @Predatorial1
      @Predatorial1 Місяць тому

      @@Priya-x9o6s If you don't know, perhaps your original comment was unwarranted.