bunny by mona awad explained?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 чер 2024
  • hope you enjoyed the shorter video! let me know what length of video you prefer :p this does contain a few mild spoilers! but i don't think it's the kind of book you can fully spoil
    for your convienence:
    intro (0:00)
    synopsis (0:29)
    theories (2:12)
    outro/cat (6:48)
    where else to find me online:
    instagram | / onceuponanemily
    pinterest | / onceuponaemily
    goodreads | / emily
    spotify | open.spotify.com/user/emily26124
    dear reader,
    recently, I immersed myself in the world of "Bunny," a book that turned out to be a delightful combination of horror and satire. It's crucial to mention this beforehand, as it significantly influenced my initial reading experience.
    a few of my favorite strengths of the book: the portrayal of female friendship dynamics was commendable, and the subtle references to other literary works added an intellectual layer to the narrative.
    venturing into the realm of theories surrounding "Bunny," the possibilities are intriguing. Is there a cult at play? mental illness? Could Samantha possess the ability to see actual ghosts? Are the other characters entangled in a web of substance-induced confusion? is Samantha's written work within the narrative a form of direct communication with the reader, revealing her true nature? this is where my mind went throughout my reading journey.
    i loved the ambiguity of the ending, appreciating its alignment with the overall vibes of the book. i feel that ambiguous endings, when executed with purpose, enhance the narrative, and "Bunny" clearly left me contemplative.
    please share your theories and thoughts in the comments below. have you stumbled upon any online theories that completely prove me wrong? let's partake in a thoughtful discussion. remember to like, subscribe, and click the notification bell to stay updated on my literary explorations. xoxox #BookTube #BunnyBook #LiteraryAnalysis

КОМЕНТАРІ • 68

  • @bpdiaryy
    @bpdiaryy 4 місяці тому +42

    one of the key key chapters for me was when she was in the bus and there was a woman reading ‚signs of having schizophrenia..‘ ……
    because i feel like she definitely has some kind of drug induced psychosis i think … but idk

    • @onceuponanemilyreads
      @onceuponanemilyreads  4 місяці тому +4

      oh my GOD i missed that, what a THEORY!! every little detail in this book can be dissected and i love that

  • @jenahstautzenberger5302
    @jenahstautzenberger5302 4 місяці тому +26

    it’s so fun to read books that are intentionally ambiguous and let the reader come up with theories about what’s going on!!! I also rlly enjoyed Bunny 🐰

    • @onceuponanemilyreads
      @onceuponanemilyreads  4 місяці тому

      yes!! what are your theories? 🐰🐰

    • @jenahstautzenberger5302
      @jenahstautzenberger5302 4 місяці тому +2

      @@onceuponanemilyreads I am having a hard time remembering but I think one of my theories was that Ava never existed at all

    • @onceuponanemilyreads
      @onceuponanemilyreads  4 місяці тому

      @@jenahstautzenberger5302 i saw some ppl talking abt this on reddit when i deep dived and i could totally see it!!!!

  • @SarahHoney-py6db
    @SarahHoney-py6db 13 днів тому +5

    The ghost theory is so interesting! My theory is that she was schizophrenic and all the characters were a mix between real people/animals and characters in her mind. Ava was a swan and the bunnies being women at her school. Kinda made sense for me because this could have been picked up by the bunnies and they took advantage of her and tried to get Samantha into their cult!

  • @victorianwhovian
    @victorianwhovian 4 місяці тому +17

    I totally agree that this book is just Samantha’s story and she’s got writing block, it would explain the memory holes, the eccentricity of the book, and the language the bunnies use (very quirky and articulate vocabulary)
    The characters in the book are very much like story book characters.
    Also, perhaps there is a point in the book that Sam cannot distinguish reality from fiction, as this would explain the scene when she confronts the Bunnies.
    I also usually hate ambiguous ending. But this book’s ambiguity was perfect!! It kept us guessing throughout the book, therefore we didn’t leave the book with an empty feeling.

    • @onceuponanemilyreads
      @onceuponanemilyreads  4 місяці тому +1

      love this!!
      i’m 50/50 on ambiguous endings and agree that this one fits the book sooo well!

  • @CoolcatzCorner
    @CoolcatzCorner 4 місяці тому +13

    I absolutely love this book. Such a unique reading experience. I like recommending it to people because if they love it I know we’ll probably get along. When a book is described as unhinged, written by a woman, and at 3.5 stars on goodreads the chances are I’m going to love it (ie all of Ottessa Moshfegh’s books)

    • @onceuponanemilyreads
      @onceuponanemilyreads  4 місяці тому +1

      i love the genre “unhinged women” i need to read more into it! what’s your favorite ottessa moshfegh book?

    • @CoolcatzCorner
      @CoolcatzCorner 4 місяці тому +1

      I know it’s the popular choice but definitely My Year of Rest & Relaxation. I think it does a good job of being both a funny and emotional read while touching on heavy themes of grief and depression.

    • @onceuponanemilyreads
      @onceuponanemilyreads  4 місяці тому +1

      will definitely add to my list :)

  • @atelieroma
    @atelieroma 2 місяці тому +6

    One detail that I noticed is how much the seminary teacher behaves and is referred to as a Mother. Practically the leader of a sect. Then it occurred to me if she was the one who taught the Bunnies to conjure darlings or if the Bunnies were the teacher's creations. It would explain how Bunnies seem like superficial characters, not at all human, with the childishness of darlings, but they have literary references due to the creator

    • @onceuponanemilyreads
      @onceuponanemilyreads  2 місяці тому +1

      OOOH big if true, definitely got alllll cult leader vibes from that woman!

    • @kristenp6132
      @kristenp6132 Місяць тому +2

      i definitely read Ursula as having taught the bunnies how to conjure the hybrids. Constantly referring to the Body, her having an actual hybrid in her house, and her consistent validation of the Bunnies self destruction

  • @sabs6212
    @sabs6212 2 місяці тому +7

    thank you!! As soon as I read the reviews on Goodreads I was upset that so many people were taking it face value. I think anyone’s personal theory is valid and fun but hating the book because you took it too literally is so crazy to me lol. I also thought that the book was an experience through writers block! I want to watch some videos of Mona talking about it (if they exist)

    • @onceuponanemilyreads
      @onceuponanemilyreads  2 місяці тому +1

      LOVE this yes 100%!!! oh my gosh i’d love to rabbit hole down her talking about it, if they exist my guess is that she is just as ambiguous as the book was

  • @keepingitup6117
    @keepingitup6117 4 місяці тому +7

    One of my personal theories about this is book is that the book bunny bases around the MC journaling her story in the mental ward, mainly because of the ending that convinced me that it’s possibly true, overall a great fun book to read

    • @onceuponanemilyreads
      @onceuponanemilyreads  4 місяці тому +2

      LOVE THIS! what about the ending made you think it’s true?!

    • @skylare8268
      @skylare8268 2 місяці тому +2

      I had this same theory!!

  • @NicolesBookishNook
    @NicolesBookishNook 12 днів тому +1

    I JUST finished this novel and I could see about 5 different ways to explain this novel because it is so open-ended and they could technically be true. This book took me 2 months to finish because how Mona write being batshit crazy and being high is on point, but it isn't very pleasant to read a lot of the time 😂

    • @onceuponanemilyreads
      @onceuponanemilyreads  12 днів тому +1

      yes it was SO open ended! i can totally see how this wouldn’t be a book you want to pick up every day; i was the opposite and could NOT get to the end fast enough

  • @lillietheoneandonly
    @lillietheoneandonly 3 місяці тому +2

    I ended up DNFing this book, I’ve been consuming a ton of theories and whatnot and I absolutely love your video, it makes me wanna go back to it and actually finish!

    • @onceuponanemilyreads
      @onceuponanemilyreads  3 місяці тому

      AH thank you for watching! 💌💌 you SHOULD!! it def improved halfway through!

  • @ellen5464
    @ellen5464 3 місяці тому +1

    You are so underrated!! I love this video! also you are so beautiful and talk so calm i love it

    • @onceuponanemilyreads
      @onceuponanemilyreads  3 місяці тому +1

      oh my gosh you are so kind!!! ❤️‍🔥 thank you, welcome!

  • @RhiannaVarney
    @RhiannaVarney 2 місяці тому +1

    I've just read this book and I loved hearing your theories! Great ideas :)

    • @onceuponanemilyreads
      @onceuponanemilyreads  2 місяці тому

      AH thank you!! did you have any good theories?!

    • @RhiannaVarney
      @RhiannaVarney 2 місяці тому

      @@onceuponanemilyreads I loved your idea that Samantha was the one writing the book 😊

  • @Witchy_Reads
    @Witchy_Reads 4 місяці тому +1

    I had a completely different experience reading this book, but I really enjoyed your analysis and theories.

    • @onceuponanemilyreads
      @onceuponanemilyreads  4 місяці тому +1

      i can totally see how someone would dislike this book! what was your experience?!

    • @Witchy_Reads
      @Witchy_Reads 4 місяці тому +2

      @@onceuponanemilyreads I'm a big character reader and instantly disliked Samantha. I also found her "friendship" with Ava a bit toxic, which turned me off. Not to mention the unrequited romance vibes I got from them. I then became obsessed with the idea of the released darlings infiltrating this town only to slowly go homicidal (the beheadings) and that it would have made for a much more entertaining and better story. It's never really touched on, and I was so disappointed. It's relatively minor things, but added together, made for a less-than-enjoyable experience. I know I'm one of the few who dislike it, but I'm okay with that. 😅

    • @onceuponanemilyreads
      @onceuponanemilyreads  4 місяці тому +1

      ⁠@@Witchy_Readsoh my gosh that would’ve been so cool if the released bunnies were doing the beheadings! i almost thought that was the bunnies!
      can totally understand dislike for samantha, i honestly hated her character for the first half of the book and thought i was going to end up with a different opinion overall

  • @midnightdreams8136
    @midnightdreams8136 23 дні тому +1

    What's your skincare routine though? We need a video on that!! 😍😍

  • @aaaarish
    @aaaarish 4 місяці тому

    in addition to the ones that you mentioned it also has a reference to Frozen (the animated movie) & Taylor swift (nightmare dressed like a daydream line)

    • @onceuponanemilyreads
      @onceuponanemilyreads  4 місяці тому

      i caught the taylor swift one but not the frozen one!! super cool

    • @aaaarish
      @aaaarish 4 місяці тому

      @@onceuponanemilyreads
      “You do realize you’re in a cult, don’t you? You’re in a fucking cult.”
      This word hurts our ears so we cover them and think-sing a song from the latest Disney musical, which is our new favorite musical. Which even though we only saw it recently, we have already watched five hundred times. It is about two sisters who live in a snowy place and one of them goes icy in her soul. It is based on a fairy tale. Now, the fairy tale is dark and stabby like this alley, but in the movie version there is a talking snowman and there are songs we love to sing. We are singing the one now where icy girl is alone on a snowy hill lamenting that she is icy in her heart. She wants to change but she cannot. Because her heart has turned to ice.
      “Shut up, Smackie.”
      It starts to rain. Hard. Because that’s the kind of weather that follows this kind of girl. She’s so slutty and dark she makes the clouds slutty and dark too. Pregnant with this dirty rain that starts to fall hard on both of us.
      - from Chapter no. 16

  • @parnaz1623
    @parnaz1623 2 місяці тому +3

    One theory I've read online is that Samantha is schizophrenic and Ava is a figment of her imagination and that's why Ava disappears while she is hanging out with the bunnies bc they're giving her all these pills. When I started reading the book I was surprised that Samantha feels like a real person but Ava doesn't. Ava was written like a manic pixie dream girl and by the end of the book it made me think all the characters who don't act like real people might have been created out of animals which led my to the theory - now bear with me it's a bit of a wild one - that the bunnies themselves were made out of bunnies. This would explain why they act the way they do and why they're so childish. They also explain to Samantha that the "darlings" are infantile but that some of them do end up getting jobs. I don't have much to support this theory especially because the bunnies don't have some kind of deformity which seems to be a sign of being a "darling" and I don't know where they got all their wealth.
    However, the guy Samantha creates out of the stag also doesn't have a deformity sooo could be that someone made the girls out of bunnies and somehow they ended up learning how to do the same through the ritual. I mean how do they even know of the ritual in the first place? Mona Awad needs to write a prequel where the backstory of the bunnies is explained!!!

    • @onceuponanemilyreads
      @onceuponanemilyreads  2 місяці тому +2

      oh my GOSH MY HEAD IS SPINNING! i love this theory; i also read about the schizophrenia online!

    • @parnaz1623
      @parnaz1623 2 місяці тому

      Haha glad you liked it :D@@onceuponanemilyreads

    • @susanalfieri4487
      @susanalfieri4487 2 місяці тому +3

      ****SPOILER ALERT**** Wait, I think the book is pretty clear that Ava was conjured up the same way the darlings were, but from the swan in the lake, yes? She never WAS real in the sense of a born & raised person. She was only real the way the other conjured "people" were; she was just a more successful conjuring. That's why the Bunnies invited Samantha into their group...because she'd had success in her conjuring (of Ava), whereas their iterations were so flawed. They wanted/needed her "power."

    • @onceuponanemilyreads
      @onceuponanemilyreads  2 місяці тому

      @@susanalfieri4487oh WOW i love this

    • @susanalfieri4487
      @susanalfieri4487 2 місяці тому

      @@onceuponanemilyreads Also, "kill your darlings" is common writing advice. So it's funny that Awad (likely intentionally) has the Bunnies (who are in a masters creative writing program) literally kill their "darlings" when they are sustandard. Journalist/columnist, writer, and professor Roy Peter Clark at the Poynter Institute for Media Studies (here in St. Petersburg, FL) even has a writing book (one of several he's produced, love him!) titled MURDER YOUR DARLINGS. So I think Awad is really playing with this terminology/phrase in BUNNY.

  • @uptongabe
    @uptongabe 4 місяці тому +2

    everything makes me think "what?"

  • @Arabesqueando
    @Arabesqueando Місяць тому

    The Ava's theory makes totally sense when you remember the strange thing Samantha says about the garden at the end of the book.

    • @onceuponanemilyreads
      @onceuponanemilyreads  Місяць тому

      omg remind me what she said?!

    • @Arabesqueando
      @Arabesqueando Місяць тому +1

      @onceuponanemilyreads at the chapter 34 she mentions more than once that "Max" is digging the ground... planting something. And at the chapter 38 Samantha says that there's a tree where she "buried her". Now I'm thinking about a bodie 🤭

    • @onceuponanemilyreads
      @onceuponanemilyreads  Місяць тому +1

      @@Arabesqueandooh my GOSH

  • @Ellier215
    @Ellier215 3 місяці тому

    Your 2nd theory made me think about the author. It’s like a mirror held up to the author. But that’s just me psychoanalyzing Mona.

    • @Ellier215
      @Ellier215 3 місяці тому

      It’s very meta.

    • @Ellier215
      @Ellier215 3 місяці тому

      I thought the ending was hopeful but I didn’t understand the mention about the mud.

    • @onceuponanemilyreads
      @onceuponanemilyreads  3 місяці тому +1

      hmm maybe mud to say “this is purposely unclear”

    • @onceuponanemilyreads
      @onceuponanemilyreads  3 місяці тому +1

      oooo this could be an entire rabbit hole!!!

  • @sabs6212
    @sabs6212 2 місяці тому

    Also you sound so much like Gabby Windey from the bachelor i love it

  • @by.sandee
    @by.sandee 25 днів тому

    I also think this was written by the protagonist. Thank God, I'm not the only one who thought about this possibility hahahah.

  • @savnicole
    @savnicole 4 місяці тому +4

    Yesss! 🦢 But also, what about her "dream" she woke up from where she had feathers on her bloody hands?! And then later, a patch of Ava's hair was missing?

  • @Nick-wv7qm
    @Nick-wv7qm 4 дні тому

    Can you tell what your Tatts mean?

    • @onceuponanemilyreads
      @onceuponanemilyreads  4 дні тому

      only a couple have meaning (2 are from books) others i just liked!

    • @Nick-wv7qm
      @Nick-wv7qm 4 дні тому

      @@onceuponanemilyreads aw ok how many books do you read in a month?