20:38 You may not remember the end of Atlantis but because of the crystals the main cast of it are basically immortal so yeah Milo would look the same lol.
Great video! "there is a video about this?" "and i already own it?" lol, has happen to me a few times :) I like "Peace on Earth" (1939) as an explanation why the humans aren't around anymore XD
The disney theory is one of the wildest theories I've seen, and i love it. Also, when talking about lilo and stich, they couldve tied recess and kim possible in there
@ I can’t completely blame him as I loved Gargoyles too but it is a shame he didn’t mention the crossovers in the Lilo and Stitch show. I mean he even came up with an explanation for the Aladdin and Hercules crossover. Then again he didn’t mention the Little Mermaid show so 🤷♂️
Addendum to this theory (long): addresing Zootopia, Robin Hood, and the Wreck it Ralph movies, none of them make sense in this timeline, but I have a potentail solution. Let's look at the problems first. Zootopia has a glaring issue that is brought in a small joke regarding Duke Weasleton. In one scene, he's showing bootleg movies, all animalized versions of real Disney films (except Gigantic, that was canceled). It does not make sense for him to sell these in the context of the theory. Ralph breaks the internet, ironically, breaks the timeline as both characters from Zootopia and Robin Hood appear in the Oh my Disney scenes. How can Disney make movies about events that haven't even took place yet? Weirdly enough, only Chicken Little makes sense in this theory, as not only is he not referenced in Ralph Breaks the Internet, but at the start of the film, a movie theatre is seen playing Indiana Jones. It is not an animal parody of it, but it is legitimate footage from the first movie, more specifaclly the iconic boulder scene (yes, I have watched this movie as a dumb kid, I am now immune to the uncanny valley). Not only is this Wreck-it-Ralph sequel ruin these movies placement into the timeline, it ruins it's own postition as well. In the disney universe, San Franscico is destroyed in 1906 and rebuilt as San Frantoyko. However, the Marvel logo can be seen, referecning the MCU. In the MCU, San Fransico retains it's original name and even plays a prominent role as the home of the Ant-Man, Scott Lang. If these films exist in the Disney universe, why would San Franscico be unaltered? As a major location in the MCU, they could've used the "real history" of it's inital destruction as part of a superhero/supervillain origin and/or major event that ties other plotlines. This evidence is admittatly weak as we do not see Ant-Man in Ralph Breaks the Internet, nor do we have a look at what the marvel movies look like in this theorized canon, but it is a point not to be ignored. ow can this be rectified? Simple. This proposal borrows from Quinten Tarintino's movie lore, as I believe it would make sense for Zootopia, Robin Hood, and the Wreck it Ralph movies to be meer movies in this timeline produced by the Disney Corperation of this proposed shared universe. That should fix the various problems in this theory, but what do you think?
While both the Pixar and Disney theories are /really/ good in their own unique ways…I still think that The Theorizer’s “Dreamworks Theory” takes the cake. It goes WAY further than the aforementioned theories and gets absolutely INSANE. I highly suggest that you take a look at it, he has a playlist of all of the videos in the theory set for easy viewing.
Good Evening . I wanted to ask , if you could maybe react to the Video ,, Fear & Hunger & Enlightenment " by Ratat ? It would be really awesome, since it is not only a really good video about Fear & Hunger , but also the different forms of enlightement and its many inspirations in the real world (please)
Wait a minute, they forgot Wall-E. Disney’s name is attached to the film’s release. Both Disney and Pixar produced the film… more surprised that Wall-e wasn’t included.
@@adalbertbuchaniec1199 Wall-E was only published by Disney, it was produced by Pixar. This was only including animated movies made by Disney directly.
At least humanity is not dead in this timeline . Still like this more than the Pixar Theory .
20:38 You may not remember the end of Atlantis but because of the crystals the main cast of it are basically immortal so yeah Milo would look the same lol.
The continuation!
Great video! "there is a video about this?" "and i already own it?" lol, has happen to me a few times :) I like "Peace on Earth" (1939) as an explanation why the humans aren't around anymore XD
The disney theory is one of the wildest theories I've seen, and i love it. Also, when talking about lilo and stich, they couldve tied recess and kim possible in there
Recess, Proud Family, American Dragon Jake Long, and Kim Possible
@NarutoTsunadefan1 Yeah, all of them could've and should've been in there because they directly crossed over with the show.
Yep
@@NarutoTsunadefan1 They used poor excuses to put one disney show in there (Gargoyles), but they had the oppertuity to add so much more! SMH
@ I can’t completely blame him as I loved Gargoyles too but it is a shame he didn’t mention the crossovers in the Lilo and Stitch show. I mean he even came up with an explanation for the Aladdin and Hercules crossover. Then again he didn’t mention the Little Mermaid show so 🤷♂️
Addendum to this theory (long): addresing Zootopia, Robin Hood, and the Wreck it Ralph movies, none of them make sense in this timeline, but I have a potentail solution. Let's look at the problems first. Zootopia has a glaring issue that is brought in a small joke regarding Duke Weasleton. In one scene, he's showing bootleg movies, all animalized versions of real Disney films (except Gigantic, that was canceled). It does not make sense for him to sell these in the context of the theory. Ralph breaks the internet, ironically, breaks the timeline as both characters from Zootopia and Robin Hood appear in the Oh my Disney scenes. How can Disney make movies about events that haven't even took place yet? Weirdly enough, only Chicken Little makes sense in this theory, as not only is he not referenced in Ralph Breaks the Internet, but at the start of the film, a movie theatre is seen playing Indiana Jones. It is not an animal parody of it, but it is legitimate footage from the first movie, more specifaclly the iconic boulder scene (yes, I have watched this movie as a dumb kid, I am now immune to the uncanny valley). Not only is this Wreck-it-Ralph sequel ruin these movies placement into the timeline, it ruins it's own postition as well. In the disney universe, San Franscico is destroyed in 1906 and rebuilt as San Frantoyko. However, the Marvel logo can be seen, referecning the MCU. In the MCU, San Fransico retains it's original name and even plays a prominent role as the home of the Ant-Man, Scott Lang. If these films exist in the Disney universe, why would San Franscico be unaltered? As a major location in the MCU, they could've used the "real history" of it's inital destruction as part of a superhero/supervillain origin and/or major event that ties other plotlines. This evidence is admittatly weak as we do not see Ant-Man in Ralph Breaks the Internet, nor do we have a look at what the marvel movies look like in this theorized canon, but it is a point not to be ignored. ow can this be rectified? Simple. This proposal borrows from Quinten Tarintino's movie lore, as I believe it would make sense for Zootopia, Robin Hood, and the Wreck it Ralph movies to be meer movies in this timeline produced by the Disney Corperation of this proposed shared universe. That should fix the various problems in this theory, but what do you think?
While both the Pixar and Disney theories are /really/ good in their own unique ways…I still think that The Theorizer’s “Dreamworks Theory” takes the cake. It goes WAY further than the aforementioned theories and gets absolutely INSANE.
I highly suggest that you take a look at it, he has a playlist of all of the videos in the theory set for easy viewing.
26:41 bolt The movie
Good Evening . I wanted to ask , if you could maybe react to the Video ,, Fear & Hunger & Enlightenment " by Ratat ? It would be really awesome, since it is not only a really good video about Fear & Hunger , but also the different forms of enlightement and its many inspirations in the real world (please)
There a bonus at the end of the welcome home vid that I think around 2 min top so it can fit a short
Wait a minute, they forgot Wall-E. Disney’s name is attached to the film’s release. Both Disney and Pixar produced the film… more surprised that Wall-e wasn’t included.
@@adalbertbuchaniec1199 Wall-E was only published by Disney, it was produced by Pixar. This was only including animated movies made by Disney directly.
Wall-E wasn’t directly produced by Disney, they just published the film.
I disagree with Moana beating rapunzel. Rapunzel has shown greater fighting skills in the movie and show.
Is Moana using the ocean to fight? Because if so then Moana would win if not then yeah Rapunzel would win