Police Brutality or Justified Force?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 16 жов 2024
- Use code blackbeltbarrister at the link below to get an exclusive 60% off an annual Incogni plan: incogni.com/bla...
Greater Manchester Police has released various statements in respect of the incident at Manchester Airport where an officer was seen kicking and stamping on a suspect's head whilst making an arrest.
Several people have been arrested, and this video discusses the use of force in self-defence and in making an arrest.
Please understand that I cannot speculate as to whether the use of force was justified and reasonable because we do not know all of the circumstances. It is highly likely that disciplinary and/or criminal proceedings will follow, and I cannot risk jeopardising any such proceedings by speculating as to whether this was reasonable.
For example, if a jury were ultimately asked to hear the case, I would not like them to be tainted by any views expressed here.
What I can do, however, is discuss the law generally for the use of force as it applies for self-defence in criminal and civil cases.
Free £50, bonuses, and more:
share.octopus....
AND MORE:
linktr.ee/blac...
Exclusive content: www.blackbeltb...
Become a Channel member: / @blackbeltbarrister
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER:
I'm a Barrister of England and Wales.
Videos for educational guidance only, Always seek advice before taking action. Videos on my channel are not legal advice and should not be taken as such. I accept no liability for any reliance placed upon the content of these videos or references, therein. Description may contain affiliate or sponsored links, for which we may receive commissions or payment.
Use code blackbeltbarrister at the link below to get an exclusive 60% off an annual Incogni plan: incogni.com/blackbeltbarrister
would it be possible for a " vid" on this""""Bailiff Got Evicted Through The Window He Entered"""" about baliff, cafe , Police a couple of weeks ago?
I have a question about the practice of Armed police officers pointing their guns at people while issuing commands such as "Get on the floor". How is this legal?
My understanding is that the threat of force (e.g. raising your fist to someone) is ITSELF an act of assault, if the victim perceives there is a real possibility force might be used.
When an officer points a gun at someone and says "Get on the floor" - the clear implication seems to be that the choices available are 1. Get on the floor or 2. Get shot.
However, if the person is not armed and not obviously presenting an immediate risk to life, there is no way the police officer could legally shoot the person. They *can't* shoot them merely for not following the command. Legally a police officer can't use lethal force merely to prevent a person resisting arrest can they?
Yet, it's standard practice for firearms officers to point their guns at suspects while issuing their commands - very much as if they are presenting them with a "Do this or get shot" ultimatum.
Is this a hollow ultimatum? If the person simply turned their back and walked away, they couldn't be shot legally could they? Doesn't the threat of force that a police officer can't legally follow through on, constitute an act of Assault?
Point to the time stamp that the guy on the floor went to grab the gun?
The man was on the ground with his arms by his side, you should know that even if you are defending yourself this behavior would not be tolerated by the Police or CPS and criminal charges would follow.
i find it interesting that you are taking the press release by GMP as gospel, as things stand we have no evidecen such as CCTV supporting the press release, remember Jean Charles de Manezes!
The offenders were lucky they are in the UK.
Attacking armed police elsewhere often ends up in death!
You mean like the country the perpetrators came from?
We only needed armed police everywhere because of them in the first place
I hate if the armed officers punched your elderly mother? White people always starting sh1t
Quite
@@rocketron9 in USA France Holland Germania..and other countries they will be dead now.. in UK police is weak lazy and not doing the job properly
These violent thugs hospitalised three Police Officers, breaking a female Officer's nose, and now they have the audacity to play victims because they want some free money, and it's understandably that an officer might overreact when seeing three colleagues assaulted.
Whatever happened before doesn't justify his actions ever, as as cop you arrest crinimals and charge them not beat them up 9n handcuffs, clearly ILLEGAL !!!!!
The officer used excessive force. Simple as.
How do you know all of this. Where you there or are you just listening to what the police are saying. How do you know that the police are not lying. In the airport there are cameras everywhere. Let's see what really happened.
It's not understandable. He is an armed officer. He doesn't have the luxury of overreacting.
@@Alex-n3o7e So you would not defend a fellow worker
Soldier gets stabbed multiple times on the street, first response from the authorities, “it’s not terror related, it could be down to mental health”, 3 police officers attending an incident at an airport are injured and hospitalised for treatment, a fourth is suspended from all duties, someone has already decided the outcome in both cases
the anthony esan case was due to mental health - the family had been trying to get him sectioned for months, adult mental health services didn't give a shit, and a soldier being stabbed was the outcome
@@UwU_for_Christ So what influenced him to pick a Serving British Soldier, what gave him the presence of mind to pick a Soldier, what was his motivation to be so switched on to pick a Soldier and no one else…… 🤔?
@@UwU_for_Christit's safe to assume that a suicide bomber has mental health issues. The fact doesn't change that instead of self harm, instead of wigging out on a random person the target was a soldier, a more symbolic victim...
@andrewheaney6858 the attack wasn't targeted - he would've stabbed you if you just happened to be there
@@UwU_for_Christ you mean like the guy who beheaded a soldier on the street a few years back? Look, you have to come with more than just chaos theory...a prior example of him killing, lets settle for almost killing a random person on the street or him going on to attack other people after the soldier or people before the soldier...you can't dismiss intent for shits and giggles
If the security at the Manchester Arena bombing had been a bit more like the officer at the airport, a lot of lives may have been saved. And it goes without saying, don't attack the police, especially female ones, and especially ones bearing weapons. It seems some demographics of the country just don't understand these simple truths, or chose to ignore them. And then cry racism.
If the security in Iraq was better then those child murdering soldiers wouldn’t have murdered 1m people
Why are female police officers so special?
So football kicking a man AFTER he has been neutralised would have lives? Dumb as a doughnut.
So they should go against what they are trained to do to deal with these situations
Dude was face down on the ground you donut
The Manchester Arena bombing....by that bloke who was signed off by Teresa May to travel to Libya, fight then topple the govt there causing mass migration then for these dipshit right-wingers to larp on about borders? 😂
If you get violent with police officers (or anyone else), you don't get to claim you're a victim when they get violent back. Sorry, but they can eff of with the plea for sympathy.
They are trained to deal with these situations without using excessive force. The officer lost his temper and hopefully his job.
No you do have rights when the police act unlawful, they don’t have unlimited rights to assault citizens
@@Enzoismybaby He did deal with the situation.
The criminally violent thugs decided the situation should be a violent one, not the police officer.
The police officer was 100% correct. All this namby pamby "yes please kick the sh*t out of our police officers" is why we live in a shitehole country, with thugs like that roaming the streets. A country where now women are afraid to walk the streets at night. With a court system that couldn't care less about the social costs of their modern sentencing bullshit.
I want the violent thugs to be scared of our police, currently as this incident proves they're clearly not. Three officers sent to hospital because some little shit bag felt entitled to be violent towards them. That has to change.
Violent back? When someone is hand cuffed and lying on the ground?
They can use force if they are at risk, however at the time the kick and stamping on head happened, there was no threat as the suspect was face down with legs crossed and hands at the side with the officer having a knee on them and the suspect got tased, so the threat was eliminated and what the kicks done was cause others to react
The are countries where an assault on police officer gets you 3 years in prison. British police and laws are both too soft on crime.
What is extremely disgusting to hear is that both men that assaulted police officers have already been released from custody. It seems that mob rule is the new order in the UK. Police have cracked under pressure to let them go. That is extremely alarming as it will make them feel they can do whatever they want.
MAybe they were released because they were not the men who assaulted the police?
Lol the amount of assumptions you are making here is insane. Were you there? Do you know the exact content of what happened? I don't think so
The dude was lying on the grand , handcuffed and defenceless. Therefore kicking and stamping on his head is excessive force.
Only two have been released, the ones that were relatively more serious haven't afaik.
@@paulallen4622then they should have had respect for the law of our land and done as they were told what made there female friend think she should have had special treatment just coz she was a Muslim they had every right to search her she could have had a bomb or drugs maybe she should not fly again
@@paulallen4622 you don't get to say somebody is making assumptions then lie about things that are objectively facts - he *was not* handcuffed.
Do that in the USA and you get $h0t.
Do that in a civilised country get arrested without violence go to court get punished according to LAW .
@@joena3557 How do you arrest violent thugs without some violence?
yep people in the US live in a police state.
Is that your recommendation?
And yet guns weren’t required to be used even though these officers had them. Sounds like the American police need more training
Why have they been released ? I thought assaulting a police officer was a serious offence.😨
Maybe never happened as people claim
@@Alex-n3o7enob
The video only shows police assaulting THEM ; it is the police who should be in custody , not the victims who were only defending their elderly mother from a racist attack by another party who was using a trolley to injure her , yet it appears that the police waded in using force where none was required , and used a taser on the victim before physically assaulting him to his severe injury .That part is amply clear from the video shown , and their body cam footage plus airport CCTV is likely to be even more damaging to them . That the other three did not arrest the one who did the kicking and stamping makes them accomplices and accessories after the fact , so their inaction makes them guilty too .
@@derekheeps1244right. Its quite hilarious we only see the police “over reacting”. We haven’t seen the lead up. Many have said its over a search. If they had nothing to hide why refuse a search? And armed police have to worry about the pillocks potentially trying to grab their weapons. General rule of thumb will be to fully have control of a rifle you’ll need both hands.
The police are investigating.
Who would I rather have protecting me. Greater Manchester Police Force or West Yorkshire Woke Service? GMP wins hands down.
What's the West Yorkshire Woke Service? Never heard of it. Sounds like you pulled it out your tight rectum.
Protecting you? Why do you think they'd do that?
I'd rather protect myself, thank you.
Is it the same GMP that had to apologise last week for their treatments of British girls and women in their custody? They are clearly not perfect. I think some of those women and girls trusted them as well
GMP covered up the Arena bombing when their officers were nowhere to be seen- all on a ‘break’ apparently. You need to do your research
The usual suspects who don't recognise our laws.
The police you mean?
What a stupid comment
@@kongofield4301funny you are
Just like Tommy Robinson who has broken your laws repeatedly
What,drunk people with surnames such as O’reilly,or Murphy?
Where’s the public outrage about the attack on the Army officer in Kent?
Are you joking? There's general public outrage. It's on all the media. 🤦🏻
@@Naptosis there’s some coverage, but nothing like the wall-to-wall about this.
If the solider was attacked by a policeman there would be outcry. He was attacked by a civilian who has been arrested and presumably charged.
Exactly!! It's getting ridiculous!!
@@magnusmunch6372 a "civilian"? From where?
These Muslims don’t think the law applied to them
These people should be deported asap!!!💯💯💯
There is a place where English law doesn't apply to them, but they refuse to go back there
So punching their elderly mother is ok?
White people and violence come hand in hand.
The police think they are above the law too clearly
@@grottybt5006 can you blame them? Your soldiers did bomb their country and children
Meanwhile a lieutenant colonel has been stabbed outside of his barracks.
Odd how MSM is trying to distract us all from THAT, onto THIS "injustice" ?
by another ethnic person, presumably an imigrant not properly tested on entry
@@apiscator444 'presumably' - and therein lies the problem. We don't know - ethnicity doesn't always fill in the blanks so easily.
He may be 10th generation; or, arrived last week. He may be mentally ill, or an extremist, a criminal...
@@apiscator444 Yep, thank goodness us Brits/westerners stay out of other people's countries and don't steal their resources and kill millions of people (to spread democracy). Why can't everyone else be more like us...
@Songstarify please, enough with the same old piffle. It gives zero justification for either of these events.
Wind the clock back 16 years when I was a police officer...
I was in Crown Court on an appeal hearing after having been found guilty of assault in Magistrates for arresting a member of a group for a legitimate offence. They made a complaint about it and I was investigated and prosecuted.
(At this time, the Hampshire PSD actually approached every single person I used any level of force on and encouraged them to complain... most were drug dealers or burglars and they all refused.)
Even the independent use of force expert involved later (we became friends) said that he had never seen such an aggressive bully of a prosecutor on a police officer.
Winding up his prosecution case, the CPS Prosecutor says to me (all cocky), "So, Mr H******, you said this group were clearly in drink, is this correct?"
Me, looking at Judge, "Yes, your Honour."
CPS: "Mr H*****, you also said this large group were violent. Is this correct?"
Me: "Yes, your Honour. "
CPS: "Mr H*****, you also said that this group were causing problems with another group, and you felt in fear of your safety. Is this correct?"
Me: "Yes, your Honour."
CPS: "So, Mr H*****, please tell me [glasses removed, and he looks steely at me], WHY did you approach this group then?"
I just let it hang in the air for a bit... I looked at the Judge, he was smiling. I looked at the Prosecutor, he had his head in his hands.
I let it hang there a little bit longer in the full Court room.
Then I replied to the Judge, "Your Honour, that is what Hampshire Constabulary pay me to do."
Didn't take long for him to uphold my appeal after that.
The prosecutor wasn't trying to be helpful. He was just too used to prosecuting people who weren't police officers.
Police officers go through this "process" on a daily basis.
Use of force can often look shocking to people who are unused to it. Personally, if I had seen members of my team punched to the ground, the justification for a higher level of force goes right up.
That guy on the floor wasn't secured. He wasn't cuffed up. If that police officer had dropped to do so, he would have been putting his firearms in reach of the offenders hands, who had already displayed that he was willing to seriously harm police officers.
I wasn't there. I can't comment. But do not jump to conclusions here.
Well said!
And thank you for your service.👍
@Sharpcarbon6 thank you, Sharp. Now the prelude to this has come to light, the officer's use of force was clearly very justified.
@kellygreen-xk6vw there is no specific policy around specific techniques in varying circumstances. That would not be feasible or realistic.
@kellygreen-xk6vw it was an arrest. You lay hands on in an arrest. That's DEFINITELY force policy of all forces.
It wasn't excessive force. It was appropriate in the circumstances. And by the way, not using excessive force is not policy. It's law.
But it wasn't excessive.
You genuinely don't know your subject. What's your agenda?
How would you feel if one of those police officers was your son or daughter?
@kellygreen-xk6vw Yes, you can arrest someone in that way. But that isn't what happened when I viewed it.
Let’s see the video footage that kicked it off.
There are cameras everywhere in an Airport.
Police won’t release that bow they are being sued . The only reason this footage exists is because an onlooker filmed it on his phone and uploaded it which is a big difference
It wasn't working ALL OF A SUDDEN
No release means guilty
Police chiefs and all send home
And those on vidoes to hmp belmarsh or hmp woodhill
It wouldnt matter, any threat was clearly over
They will never show those videos it will put the pigs in more shit.
The police should publish all their film footage of the whole episode from the time of the police attendance as it might show the extent of the violence encountered by all?
Of course they could have cleared this up right away with footage. Looks like the regime is throwing him under the bus for whatever reason.
I can hazard a guess why
True as this is still.one sided however it is not upto the officer to kick the guy in the head, if he was in fact reaching for a weapon as is the excuse
Then he would have still reached for the weapon if he was being kicked in the head, sorry but he was not reaching for anything he already faceplanted the ground and could barely move his arms.
Looked more like he was having a seizure lol
@@grottybt5006 don’t think that’s going to work, because there is ctv footage, of all this and the build up, we’re the apparent victims were knocking fuck out of the police.
All this will come out, if went to court!!!
Going to be interesting
They should publish it, but the Main Stream Media will not will not let it see the light of day. Nothing gets in the way of the MSM woke agenda
I'm guessing as it's under investigation, they'll limit what they show to the public until an outcome is reached.
I'm fairly sure the footage shown wasn't even released by GMP, it's probably a bystander since we all know when the police come under attack, rather than offering assistance, people these days reach for their phones to record a video to post online.
I'm getting sick of this continued attacks on our Police, and if you attack an armed officer , put 3 police in hospital then you should be sent to prison for a very long time, these are armed officers. This will obviously go to court I just hope the police get a win on this.
Attacking armed Police at an Airport should be classed as a terrorist attack.
Classed as stooooooooppiiid
They wasn't their mother abused by white passenger the kids only defending their own mum
you need to look up the definition of terrorism
Agree 100% …
@Claire-es6hz Who are these people, and what race card?
For context, if the guy tried to take a firearm off a cop in the US, he'd be cancelled from living.
@@craiglee3653 he didn’t though, he attacked the officer after the officer attacked his mom. I know white people don’t care about their parents but other people do.
That's no context. This is not the USA. We have different standards here in the UK and we expect the police to behave with more integrity and professionalism.
@@markandrews6054 The only standards in the UK are double standards!
This wouldn't make the news if it wasn't for their religion.
@@markandrews6054 What Planet are you from.
These men were not in the US so US culture is not in any way relevant. Under British law these men were subdued and therefore under police "protection". The police are 100% liable for the protection of a subdued person in custody, they should not attack a prisoner and to do so is no different to a criminal attacking a policeman.
I recall some time ago when one of my colleagues was in the Crown Court giving evidence in a case. The defence barrister stood for cross-examination and, with a smug look on his face said, "I put it to you officer that you assaulted my client (he meant the prisoner, the defendant) with your truncheon." Tony said, "I did - twice - very hard."
The judge grinned and said, "Perhaps you would like to enlarge on that officer."
Tony said, "He was struggling so much and I was having great difficulty restraining him. Then I remembered that I had been supplied with a bit of wood called a truncheon which is specifically intended for hitting people - so I did."
The judge smiled and said, "Thatnk you officer, I think that has covered that."
So they attacked emergency workers then plead brutally
They may have attacked emergency workers...but that doesn't give the police the right to assault them. The British Justice System should decide what happens to them.
Yes and both of those things can be true (without all the footage it is difficult to know if both are)
It can be true that the person attacked a police officer
It can also be true that the police officer acted in a brutal way
The two acts are not mutually exclusive
@@glenn1534actually in that context yes it does, it justifies any force the officer felt necessary to preserve the safety of himself and those around him. Floor guy should be thanking his lucky stars it was a boot not a bullet.
@@PaulJohnson-mb8sf not to mention racism don’t forget racism
Not mutually exclusive
That was an armed officer. The restraint was not drawing his weapon...what do you think would have happened in the USA with armed officers? He made sure the guy wasn't getting back up because the next step is a lot more serious for ALL concerned. I'd have done the same to make me safe and make sure I don't need to go the extra step!
Yep. As Donut Operator demonstrates weekly.
and you'd be fired all the same, numbskull
Also in the Netherlands and most European countries, by the time it had escalated to this, weapons would have been drawn and at the very least a warning shot fired.
Yep let's be more like the USA where a cop just shot an old lady as he was afraid of her
what would have happened elsewhere is a stupid argument, if you were in chine you wouldn't be allowed to comment.
This was an officer that lost control and wanted to hurt the suspect, not restrain them.
Imagine whilst at your work place, you were assaulted, a lady gets her nose broken…. FULLY AGREE WITH THE POLICE, ABOUT TIME!! Had they managed to take a weapon, what would have happened, anywhere else and they would have been shot!
Please back our police.
Police should not be walking around carrying firearms ; they should be kept lock fast only to be deployed with the express permission of a senior officer .
You still wouldn't be justified in using lethal force against a downed opponent.
They were released after 90 minutes, says it all
@derekheeps1244 you are joking, 😂😂😂😂😂
👍👍
Thanks to the police for keeping the public safe .WELL DONE.
I hope the female police officer is OK.
@@tonysheerness2427 Broken nose....
@@specialse Very painful, why should anyone suffer doing one's job. All they had to do was do what the police asked.
@@tonysheerness2427 when do they ever .....agreed , horrible injury in the line of duty
.
@tonysheerness2427 tell that to your football hooligan mates lol
Typical UK logic....the attackers were freed after a mob surrounded the police station....The policeman was relieved of duties
No - they had already been released before the mob got there.
The video shows fucking nothing. It shows what you want it to. @@zaidahmed9527
The video evidence clearly shows his gross misconduct .
Rule of thumb the police cannot take their hands away from the gun that's why he used his leg.
Subdued kept trying to reach under his body whilst on the ground… reasonable to suspect was going for a weapon
spot on.
So a kick in the head and a stomp on his head is justified?1
I don’t think it says that in any policy document on the use of force I’ve ever read nor is it in any statute I’ve come across.
It was assault from a government thug.
@@cypeman8037 So the Police follow the law and not a bunch of foreign thugs, not any more.
Hmmm poor petal@@cypeman8037
@@cypeman8037it was a kick or a shot to the head witch one would you choose .
What we have is a tribal society, created by Westminster. One of the tribes.
In a tribal society, you can commit any crime, so long as its against another tribe, and your side will cheer you on.
That includes the tribe that the man belongs to, who were chanting about him being stamped on.
Welcome to the dire state of the UK, created by Westminster.
It's tribal because we voted for it. It has nothing to do with Westminster.
The electorate overwhelmingly voted for left or far left parties. This is a choice of those people.
@@polychad Agree and will only get worse given the changing demographic.
Created by Blair* more people entered the U.K. under Blair than the previous 900 years.
@@polychadDisagree. You've assumed
1. that we have a right of consent. i.e No choice.
2. that we tell the Westminster tribe what to do. No its the other way.
It's everything to do with Westminster.
Where's the vote saying foreign criminals must be deported?
Where's the vote saying migrants must pay more tax than they cost?
You are, and I'm being polite, deluded if you think people voted for any of the above.
@@polychadI wouldn’t call it overwhelming, it’s 52 (labour, Lib Dem, green) to 38 (conservative, uk) approx. The overwhelming majority result is because of first past the post, not because the electorate overwhelmingly voted so. Also the 2nd lowest voter turnout (60%) since 1885 which further reduces the “electorate overwhelmingly chose left/far left”. Reality is people were just sick of the absolute state of the current government rather than some massive left leaning shift. I voted labour FYI so if anything im left biased.
Condemned for doing the job they are hired to do. The top brass needs to go, not the officers.
Well said!
Support police in this matter
Why because of the statement they put out? How many times in the past have we seen police put out a statement and the video evidence doesn't not support what they claim happened. The only video evidence we have right now is the police kicking a man on the ground in the head.
Heard that when they murdered that woman in London. Can't just keep supporting them when they do these things.
Aaaah yes back the blue...until it happens to you. Back to your cave whence you came troll.
Support the rule of law and common sense mate .
Definitely 💯
Justified, the men had already used violence on an officer and are refusing orders to remain on the ground.
Wait til they come do the same to you for speech crime, see if you still feel like you should obey like a good dog.
The cops did abh on camera to static man, his more crooked than the people they are arresting
Refusing orders to stay on the ground? Was he trying to get up before being booted and stamped on? The other guy obeyed when he told to go to ground, obviously not fast enough before getting kicked and punched down
The police are not vigilantes dishing out instant mob justice .
@@joena3557 They are the footsoldiers of globalism, feminism, DEI, Covid and every other deluded injurious political attack against Britain.
Who goes to the airport and punches a police woman in the face breaking her nose, they are very lucky that’s all he did, what a bunch of muppets the so called victims 🥴🙄🤦♀️🤡🤡🤡
He should be promoted not removed from duty.
100%
He should be sacked and charged with GBH, it is never acceptable to kick someone in the face when they are not resisting.
@@Discobiscuit372 So your argument is that there are times when it's ok to kick people in the head?. And if you watch the whole film not the tiny edited clip they are resisting.
@@stephenmudiecastles.2938
It’s never acceptable for a policeman to kick someone in the head when they are flat out lying on their belly with their arms by their side, end of.
Keep dreaming
The right thing is to suspend him forever and charge him with assault
My cousin 'used' to be a police officer, 6'3" and 20 stone! Quite a scary one!
He was called to a scene of domestic abuse, and upon restraining the guy, they fell on the floor, and the guy bumped his head! Well, the girl my cousin was trying to protect pressed charges on my cousin! all on cctv - but still, the police wouldn't back my cousin!
Suffice to say he is no longer an officer - not wanting to put his life on the line when your employer doesn't have your back!
It seems that the police force it's a joke.... Officers arrest someone and the court release them...🤔
The officers behaviour is totally unacceptable. What is more shocking are the lynch mobs building up on both sides and the condonation of some people
Agreed
They find out UK law does actually apply to them .
Only when it threatens the police.
Not when it threatens us.
@@tonyhudson8235 good point
@@tonyhudson8235do you carry, on a regular basis, a firearm be it either the Glock pistol, MP5 or a more larger calibre firearm? The risk to the police and other members of the public goes up exponentially if he got hold of any firearm. In other countries, if a member of the public did this, the end result could and probably would have ended up in a far more deadly ending.
@ohbollox2it
If the threat was purely to the public, it would've been the usual "Mistakes have been made" speech
Oh
Added note.
Not anymore. But I used to. And have had extensive training with both sidearms and single shot rifles on respect to close protection.
I trained in and taught practical baton and unarmed restraint, among other things.
It was some time ago, but I still remember a thing or two.
Well, he'll probably get a handout now
At least those being detained are of the ‘mostly peaceful’ kind.
Yeh cause illegally invading half the world is peaceful. They call their child bombing soldiers hero’s 😂
There was a few ‘mostly peaceful’ types with beards in the room holding mobiles, looking like they were recording it.
@@MarkARhodie maybe you needed serial law breaker Tommy Robinson there. He’s got a history of beating up police and women. Once at the same time.
They are out and trying to get all the officers arrested
Out come the racists... bunch of rapey nonce you lot.
Older American here. Regardless of what happened prior to the subject ending up on the floor, how can any one justify or support a police officer kicking & stomping on the head of a subdued offender, while the offender is lying face down on the floor? Those kicks to the head were acts of rage & retaliation, not good police work.
Regardless of what preceded the act shown in the video, the confrontation was over, the subject had been subdued, placed in a controllable position to the point where the threat posed by this subject was minimal. The officer's stomping on the head of a detained subject was nothing short of RETRIBUTION / pay-back for the subjects totally illegal & despicable prior actions against the officers.
I understand the officers motivation & emotions, especially seeing how a female officer was significantly injured, but properly trained, professional police officers, must be able to control their level of their aggression, & get their emotions under control, once a subject is no longer a significant threat.
I find the tone of many of the comments posted very disturbing, reminiscent of the bad old days [1920's - early 1960's] in America's deep south. Many of the commentors seem to be applauding & justifying the officer's actions as a justifiable form of pay-back not only for the assault on the officers involved but as a justifiable expression of a general frustration for a wide range of policing, political & social issues currently facing the people in the UK.
I'll assume that the police officer in question did everything by the book UP TO the point where he let his emotions run wild & he stomped & kicked a defenseless offenders head. Lets be honest here, not a good look, a police officer who lost control of his emotions, a female officer that MIGHT NOT have had enough training or MIGHT NOT have been physically able or who didn't possess the necessary skills or size to adequately defend / protect herself & a bunch of commentors, many presumably from the UK, who seem to condone police officers dishing out pay-back or taking out their frustrations on a subdued subject.
This question is not intended to be offensive but I doubt I'm the only one who is curious about the statement, issued by police HQ, that said, something to the effect that, there was a clear risk that the criminals might have been able to have taken the officers gun from them.
Respectfully, I'm sure I'm not the only viewer that wonders, how often have your armed police officers been disarmed by criminals? Are your armed officers so physically weak or so poorly trained that this is really a valid concern in the UK? To me this sounds like someone trying to lay the groundwork to try & justify the officer's head kicks.
Thank you to all those who took the time to read this comment.
Thank you for your well thought out comment.
He wasnt subdued. He was on the floor refusing to show both his hands. One hand was under his body, it was unknown if he had a weapon, just that he had attacked 3 officers and was refusing to comply to put his hands behind his head. The firearms officer had 2 choices, use his rifle or kick, he chose the less than lethal option.
The animals lauding víoIence don't realise that if this is acceptable, their faces would be the ones under the boot eventually.
If you can't control your emotions, you shouldn't be a police officer.
They were in an airport and had been screened. Retaliation pure and simple. @quillo2747
Some good points but officers in the US have had guns taken from them and a few in the UK too. A holster is for access and a stealthy hand can take a weapon especially in a fighting situation. Also, as I’m sure you are aware the situation is not contained until the suspect is handcuffed.
12:14 I have read that only one arm was out. He refused to bring out his other arm, despite being ordered to. It was tucked in his waistband - that's maybe why he got kicked, to stop him from possibly accessing a concealed weapon.
That's exactly right. He refused to comply. Now he could have had anything under there.As many people have said that justice here was soft - had he not complied in the USA he would never have got up again.
Hadnt he just been tasered, maybe he wasn't thinking straight at that particular moment
@@randommusic4567if he had been intent on being a good citizen he wouldn't have been in that position at all. Lucky to get a boot not a bullet.
@@randommusic4567you could see his arms seize up as he was being tased. Thats when the copper kicked him. His arms at no point reached or anywhere near his firearm at that time.
...so why not kick the arm.? Nope doesn't make sense
A suspect attempted taking her side-arm, that man is lucky he didn't get taken out permanently.
Which suspect tried to take her side arm and how did the police handle that suspect ?
You understand the police never said someone tried to take any side arm but they said they was afraid it might happen ?
You understand the suspect was face down, and legs crossed and arms at the side with the officer having situation under control and being tased and kicked and stamped on, are you telling me he was a threat at that time ?
@@M.E63 of course he was.
@@LeeEnfield-iw3qk of course he was what exactly ?
You are not taking any side arm face down with legs crossed with arms at the side with an officer with a knee and being tased.
Officers never even claimed someone tried to take it but they clearly said they was afraid someone might take it
@@M.E63 They did, read the statement released by Manchester police
@@M.E63 No your wrong he was trying to get a gun.
Should be charged with GBH. Full stop.
Yeah the thugs hitting the police, look at the full footage
He should be given a medal for protecting his colleagues. Not suspended.
It was a dynamic fluid situation and needed a strong response.
People need to understand if you pick onbthe emergency service then this will happen.
He didn't go overboard.
And real policing doesn't look pretty.
Hear, hear ! ! VERY well said. God knows what could have been in his left hand, and that bold Officer dealt with him rapidly, to ensure EVERYONE'S safety ! Medal AND promotion !
Please describe what going overboard entails then.?
@@AngelaH2222 "Going OVERBOARD" would have been drawing his FIREARM and either threatening or USING it on the offender. ps., AS would have happened in other countries.
EVERYTHING the Officer did was recoverable from. USING his firearm would NOT have been.
Does that make it a bit clearer for you ?
@@AngelaH2222
Tell me why you think this was overboard then?
I don't like the police but they need to be able to do their job without being assaulted
@@oldskoolbeats1989 take a look at the training given to prison officers who deal with violent criminals all day long... None of that training involves stamping on a prisoner's head.... In all cases of restraint the Golden Rule is ALWAYS protect the head (I'm not in the forces, but in my roles I've had to use control and restraint techniques on numerous occasions)
If he didn't act he could have ended up like the soldier in Kent that the media is very cagey about thoroughly reporting on.
Get a job
@@highcastle1013
Get a brain
@@highcastle1013
Get a brain
Comments being deleted,
@@highcastle1013
Trying again,if you have a brain use it
I’d rather have police that aren’t afraid to get stuck in, than woke officers who ask nicely & get their weapons taken off them.
That's a straw man argument. No one is suggesting officers should just ask nicely.
They should NOT be carrying weapons in the first place .
@@derekheeps1244 What? They are a specialised armed unit and allegedly the attackers tried to take the weapon.
AT LAST A REAL COPPER
Yes a real fagg. Ot copper stomping on mans head while the mans handcuffed and facedown on the ground.
The cop should get a medal, for protecting his female colleague but the sad truth in broken Britain is he will probably loose his job ,but then again im old school when Britain had standards.
Agreed! lose…
Didnt protect her u clown. Her nose was broken 😅😅😅😅😅
Just looked up for the definition of terrorism you 👆
If you go frame by frame when you see the officer drop on him to pin his arm to the floor you can see he has a metal object in his hand, he has already proven he is a threat, and there is a civillian in the middle of the situation who keep touching the suspect limiting any chance to use firearms or tasers. The kicks gave him chance to close the distance and prevent the item being used as a weapon. This is why we need the video from 10-20 seconds earlier to see if the offcier was calling for complaince to drop the object.
One of the few worthwhile officers we have, and they suspend him, madness
Madness aint it. Lock him up for attempted murder. Police think they can get away with anything
@@28mouse85Muslims think the law doesn't apply to themselves
He'll be on full pay until its resolved. It doesn't imply guilty
@@jons9721 until he goes to prison. Then hell be jobless and rightly so
@@jons9721 I promise you he'll be sacked, Immigrants will demand it
Just a thought, if you are a firearms officer holding two handed gun, you have only your legs to use to subdue a violent threat to the public in a non lethal manner.
Very good point
@@DerekEmerson You didn't see what had happened beforehand
Nope if you are a Police Officer with a fire arm you have to tether it to yourself or you can't take it out.
A load of copers walking around with guns that they could be stripped of would pose a greater risk to the public than it solved.
The Police do not walk around with their weapons loose. If these coppers where they are done for. The worry they would loose their weapons is a non starter. Everybody knows you use a sling.
@@WestfieldFreshAir true, but the police officer used excessive force on a person who was lying on the floor, face down having just been tazered, there was absolutely no reason for him to kick him in the face and then stamp on his head no to a concrete floor which could have fractured his skull.
I support police using force but this is crossing the line. Even if an officer was previously assaulted that does not give this office the right to ‘exact revenge’ he still has to abide by police conduct and the use of reasonable force when arresting someone.
Hopefully, Police bodycam, airport security footage and video from other witnesses will reveal the incident from start to finish and Partisan speculation can be ceased.
The armed Police, especially the Female police officer, should sue the whole family, but I doubt they would get nothing more than £100 victim compensation if it went to court .
Our penchant for softly wokey nicey nice is the overriding reason crime in this country has reached such epic proportions. In many, many countries around the world, this policing behaviour would be considered light.
Fortunately we do not live in such violent and oppressive societies
@@derekheeps1244 you don't think?
All we see is a snapshot of the incident we should all hold back till the whole story is laid bare for us all to see. I have the greatest respect for most of our police forces who have a difficult job under difficult circumstances to see them do their job is very refreshing.
100% agree
They had already attacked four police officers, injuring three of them, including breaking a WPC's nose, and then refused to obey the armed officers instructions, so they are lucky not to have been shot, yet they are claiming to be the victims.
He's going to find it hard to justify using that amount of force at the point he used it.
Precisely, he used repeated IethaI force on a downed and controlled suspect. That's not the kind of officer we want serving our populace.
Agreed. Thankfully there's lots of cameras around. Unfortunately it's very difficult to get fired from the Police.
@@martinpatterson3417 I disagree Martin, I'd be extremely surprised if he keeps his job. As much as you might not think the police don't do enough around disciplining their officers, I assure you they are very harsh when dealing with excessive uses of force.
So far we haven't seen the full film footage, apparently, there was an incident on the flight which is why the police were ready and waiting to arrest them prior to film footage that we have seen. The men resisted arrest and assaulted emergency workers, that is a crime, deserving of a prison sentence. The men that were arrested have been let free??!!!!
there is no evidence that the one who was assaulted by kicking and standing about the head in any way attacked anyone - he reportedly was defending his elderly mother from a racist attack by others .
@@derekheeps1244 We have to wait to see all of the CTV and body cam footage. You can't trust the Islamist lawyer who is political and stood as a pro-Gaza MP in the recent general election. Let me put it another way, armed police aren't sent to arrest people if there hasn't been an incident.
@@derekheeps1244 There's no evidence of what you've said at all. Don't discredit what someone else says because video evidence hasn't emerged yet, only to then go and state more unproven information that lacks video evidence. That's the actions of a moron.
@@derekheeps1244 Correction, the mother refused to be searched by officers and only then did her sons get involved and start causing trouble. The incident began on the flight, and it sounds like when she leaving the flight/baggage pick-up that a member of the general public said something to her.
Not a fan of the modern police force. However, these actions appear completely justified.
You seriously think that kicking someone in the head then stamping on it is justified? You're up in the head mate
Traditional police would have taken him to cells and made him unrecognisable for hitting a police officer.
You should've gone to Specsavers
@@whocares5773 it turns out this was not that guy lol ...but who cares lol
If he was white you will say otherwise, right ?
Im amazed how many people think armed police are meant to give you a cup of tea and a hug after assaulting someone in an airport. No wonder this country is going to the dogs.
They’re not generally expected to kick you in the head after you’ve been tazed
The thing is, we don't know the full picture.
If you break the law, act violently then the police should deal with it.
Nothing justified it
@@Reece-3601 What was in the guys left hand that he was hiding out of sight, A gun, Knife, Bomb ? if you play silly games in high risk areas.
Thhe police assaulted his mum the guy defends his mum and then gets battered by the police what the police said is a cover up a lie
People are so gulible, we have ONE side of the story from the 'attacks', booting people in the head who were laid motionless on the floor...trying to justify their thuggery...
So what could happen that can justify a police officer kicking and stamping on a suspects head while the suspect is laying on his stomach and his hands by his sides. At that moment the suspect stopped being a threat, especially with the officer having his taser drawn and other officers there as back up
He was a wanted person,
They tried to arrest him peacefully and he and his buddy decided to use Viølence
Even breaking a female officers nøse
In the process.
They are armed officers and can't afford to be rolling around on the floor.
I'd love to see how these people would react if they were in the PO situation.
oh, really. Did you see video footage of that? If so, would you be so kind as to share that? There's a good fellow.
They didn't try to arrest him peacefully, they slammed his head into the ticket machine which is when he started fighting back. I don't blame him for that tbh. The police escalated the situation.
It's not up to police to exact a punishment, their job is to prevent and detect crime then to detain suspects and collect evidence. None of that justifies going beyond necessary force.
Are you aware, in receipt of full facts and context, no....
@@ExploringAlway At the risk of repeating myself we don't do summary justice.
Clearly an appropriate force!
Think you've took a few boots to the head yourself mate
100% justified for the usual suspects still posing threats
Typical white people. Punched the elderly mother
no it is not justified in anyway for this policeman to kick and stamp on a man while he is face down on the ground these people were in the wrong to do what they did but this policeman should not have done what he did
What threat was he posing on the ground, face down, while convulsing from being tased?
@@markennyee Lee Rigby was 100% justified
First of all we haven’t saw any police getting attacked and yes if and when they was getting attacked they can use force which is not a issue, but the question is at the time of the kicks was the suspect a threat ?
Video shows there was no threat at that time.
If you ever been to a football match then you know who the usual suspects are that commit affray and at pubs and bars etc
I think we can blame the 'human rights' lawyers for this line of reasoning. They are making loads of money out of defending criminals, so naturally, as part of their job, they are going to come up with some creative defences, such as, 'Well, yes, I attacked the police officer first but...I'm really the victim.' We can fill in the details ourselves! We have heard it all so many times already. I'm weary of it.
Justified force, breaks a little policewomans nose, and injured 3 others who needed treatment, tazered, sprayed, and rough handled, is in my opinion is a soft touch, only because he's a migrant, and no doubt Muslim, that all the shite is going on.
That's not how the law works, are you even listening to the video????
Little policewoman... so patronising. Also if she is not capable then she shouldn't be there if she is capable then fact she is female is irrelevant
Gender of the injured officers isn't relevant. It's demeaning to the officer and diminishes the injuries of the other injured officers. As to size, we have no information about that
so your sexist?
🙄 sexism, racism, and islamaphobia all in one statement, surprised you didn't go for the jackpot and round it off with a sprinkling of homophobia too... The fact is some idiot got physical in an airport, and a cop returned the favour with malice,, where his parents came from or if he is religious is irrelevant
Totally justified response. It is worth remembering why we now have armed police at airports.
A suspect is in the prone position, arms by his side. And an officer walks up and soccer kicks him in the head numerous times? No thats not justified, its attempted murder
@@cavendish9748 handcuffs or not. His arms was by his side/ behind him. Imagine the roles was reversed. This is attempted murder
@@28mouse85 Didn't see any handcuffs!!! This officer deserves a medal. The suspect was trying to reach under his body, could have been reaching for an explosive device.
@@28mouse85he’s not in handcuffs, there is a further threat (other subject) just in front, they had previously been rolling around with this subjects in a bum fight where there was a risk of the firearms officers’ weapons being taken and either the officers (or more likely the subject) being sh0t. This prevented that risk.
@@28mouse85You were not there and you are only viewing a short video with no sound, yet you rush to judgment.
I really hope you are never called for jury duty because that can only fall to people who are willing to wait for all the evidence and reserve judgment until then.
Police brutality it would seem.
The bottom line, as far as I am aware, is that the suspect suffered no damage from the kick or the foot stamp. That suggests the officer was simply sending a message rather than attempting to do the suspect harm. It worked as we can see, as the suspect stopped violently trying to resist arrest.
No medical follow up was done by GMP on this, despite the head kick and head stamp. That is despite GMP, and UK police policy, of doing medical checks on all head injuries. He was later ealsed without charge.
He wasn't violently trying to resist he was lying on the floor with his arms by his side.
@@josim Can you hear what he was saying / threatening? Can you predict what an offender who just assaulted your colleague might do at any moment?
@@josim And looked like hed been tasered previously. i.e. zero threat
@@WihGlah It makes no difference the man was flat on his face his arms by his side at that stage he was no threat to anyone, if the man died because of those actions the Policeman would be looking at a manslaughter charge. Attacking someone on the floor who is no danger to anyone is not considered self-defense as the BlackBeltBarrister should know.
The kick and stamp to the fella on the floor (who had a hand under his body and could of been reaching for a weapon) doesn't concern me. Copper orders you to show him your hands you don't fuck around or this happens, fair enough.
However, the other fella with his hands on the back of his head sat in the background.....copper approaches him and orders him to get on the floor, he's in the process of kneeling down and, as soon as he dips his head, gets clubbed over the back of the head with a taser pistol. Not entirely sure that was needed since he was complying and his hands were clearly empty.
Booting, kicking and stomping on a prone man's head doesn't concern you?..
Sociopathy 😲
It’s a usual practice all around the world
Not a single victim had any weapon, apart from thier fists.
And considering they had just got off the plane, one would assume there would have been ample checks during the moment they checked in to when they got off to ensure they had no weapons on them.
@user-kb2fh7ox5e
Rubbish.
Since 9/11 the security measures introduced at airports has been un-precedented. There are covert monitorings that many are not even aware off that takes place.
They were travelling with female members of their family. People planning to engage in terrorism don't take their families with them.
No one cares whether you come to UK or not. Many US cities are far worse than the UK.
Oh and the fact you feel you need to go somewhere where it is ok to carry a gun, hardly speaks volume about the safety of that location 😂😅
Was he being shouted at... "show your hands" and not compying?
Language barrier.
@@TheMSS1977 tough
@@Odysseuss. indeed.
The one sat on the bench was treated the same. Hands behind his head.
That doesn't give the officer permission to kick him in the face.
Until you’ve been in the armed forces or the police, you’ll never understand how frightening and quickly these situations happen, it’s so easy watching a video from your nice warm settee, replaying it and saying what you would have done! You wouldn’t do the job, so don’t criticise!
Where did you serve.
You're talking non sense no army force would use violence against unarmed civilian while on the floor already
@@highcastle1013 what military service did you do?
@@garyarthur5662 green berets
@@lrdisco2005Northern Ireland!
Makes a change seeing them get stuck in, they usually run away from our many guests when they're kicking off.
Still a risk until he is cuffed in my humble opinion
These thugs in black are a risk to others as long as they are allowed to walk around with multiple offensive weapons .
Err, so then cuff him first as is standard practice!?
If the people did as they were told there would be no need for force.
The guy sitting on the bench in the back with hands on the head was fully complying to all orders. Still got kicked and pistol whipped.
A guy in Tesco's about 2 years ago did exactly what he was told when ask the leave the store. The cop still beat him up as he was leaving, they can't be unaccountable.
@@robmo6505 There are always rogue cops but not all are and that happened 2 years ago.
@@tonysheerness2427 Kicking a man in the face with such force whilst he is on the floor seems pretty rogue.
Did you stay indoors and do as you were told during COVID 😂
IMHO the force used was "retribution". The officer in question took it upon himself to punish the men for earlier activities. Did they deserve it? Maybe. Is it that officers job to decide? No. In the video the men where subserviant, imobile and not a threat. Therefore no force was necessary to handcuff him and take him away. No attempt was made to arrest him before they began assaulting him.
The female officer suffered a broken nose. The female office is attractive. The male officer felt it was his (raged) duty it assualt the man in return in front of the officer as some sort of mating ritual.
As to the comment about the firearms officers. There is a reason we have "firearms officers" and "non firearms officers". Firearms regardless of the hands they are in, or meant to be in, massively elevate risk in any and all interactions with the criminals or innocent public. WIthout this realisation we would be far more like the USA.
The police officers would obviously be aware that cctv and every man and his dog would have been recording the incident, so they know whatever action they use they will have to justify, as long as they can justify their actions then it would be considered reasonable force.
Police officers aren’t higher education recruits, they probably didn’t realise there were cameras everywhere to be honest.
If the officer is charged, he needs to push Article 6, it's going to be a serious issue with a jury around Manchester.
It is a serious issue anywhere , this sort of police misconduct can never be tolerated .
@@derekheeps1244 well, social media is seeing to it that he can't get a fair trial so it probably isn't worth charging him at this point. The man is going to go free even if he should be tried.
The condition of the victim of this police assault has now been reported to have worsened .
Following a CT scan , he has been found to have a cyst on the brain , it has not been reported where this is life threatening , but it is a serious condition .
It has also been reported that the person on the ground who was kicked about the head , and stamped on had already been tasered by the police before being restrained - so would hardly have been in any position to offer resistance , and quite possibly would be disorientated .
This may leave the suspended officer open to charges of causing ABH or GBH .
Lots of comments being delete today! Its gone down to 330.
I wonder why.
Even UFC you cannot kick people in the head when person is on the ground. Now the Muslims will get compensation from the police.
Subjectively, I have zero sympathy for the miscreant. Don't resist arrest !
The guy lying in the prone position had his left hand/arm underneath him and wasn't doing what he was told, by the Firearms Officer.
This is what you get with 2 tier policing one rule and one rule for Pakistani people
@@christineallen-en2uu The Police clearly make blunders! They (must’ve been over 50 police officers) that raided my dad’s shops in the 80s or 90s on Hoe Street, E17, generated a big hoo haa! In the end, they found nothing and end up apologising!!! I think they love ❤️ to hate “Pakis!”
Some would say....If people were good law-abiding citizens who complied with instructions, this, most likely would never have happened
And take a look at the guy in the background, compliant and beaten..
Exactly, but not mentioned in any report.
If he was reaching for the gun everybody in the area was at risk until he was in handcuffs. And the fastest way that is done the better for everyone.
That's not what the video show's
@@ikr2377 that's why I said. If he was
The English Police force doesn't have the best reputation. They need to make an example of this policeman and clean up their act.
Definitely justified force. We should be supporting our police officers, in such dangerous situations.
Context
Context
Context
Without the above you cannot make an unbiased objective conclusion on the events.
This is outrageous.
People need to know that they can attack the police and other emergency workers, without the risk of suffering harm themselves.
People should be able to safely attack and injure police officers without the worry of incurring any such injuries themselves.
It's bad enough that they can be prosecuted for something as silly as punching a police woman.
In some cultures, hitting women who "step out of line" is common place, so surely this is tantamount to a racist law!
Honestly.
I don't know what's happening to this country!
As a former healthcare professional, kicking or stamping on someone’s head can do massive damage! I can’t really see how it is appropriate in any civil context, but I haven’t seen the entire incident which is extremely important. However this type of action is often primarily aggressive and part of a vent of anger or retribution, particularly if the recipient is already prone! Do firearms officers not also carry tasers or other non-lethal aids to restraining someone?However, such conflicts involve split second decisions and reactions. These consideration does not excuse those physically attacking the Police in any way, and violence perpetrated against armed police officers could well result in discharge of their weapons, in entering such a conflict the aggressor must surly be aware of what he is doing and what risks he faces.
you can't see any appropriate reason? Never been in a fight then have you. I have been, plenty of times. In this situation the 3 perps had wrestled the armed officers, who have a duty of care to not let these perps grab their gun in a crowded airport. Just because he is lying down means ZERO, the cop has to secure the perp, by kneeling and cuffing him, putting his gun in easy reach, also the female is knelt next to the perp and is a potential ally to the perp, even if it's as a distraction but more so if she puts her arms around the cop, potentially giving the perp plenty of scope to grab the gun and turn it on all the folk nearby.
He clearly should have been fast tracked straight in for knighthood......
At absolutely NO point did the person the officer assault even look like they were reaching for the officer's gun. He kicked them in the head long before he was within arm's reach. The woman over the top of the person on the ground did move forward slightly, but the officer wasn't even looking at her. They had three officers on them with Tazers. The person on the floor was of zero threat at this point - and there would be no reasonable excuse to believe otherwise, since the officer was only looking at the head at this point anyway. I'm not sure how the officer could have detected any threat from a head movement from someone on the ground.
What is most likely here is that the officer was angry and took it out on the suspect. Not only did he kick the person, but he then stamped on him afterwards - NO amount of threat warranted that action in ANY situation, unless consciousness and brain function were somehow linked to the persons ability to create a threat. But, as usual, I imagine the IOCP will close ranks, once again, put him on desk duty for a month and then shuffle him off to another department once the public outcry dies down.
i'm with the police on this one well done i say
Because they're brown ?
If the man on the floor was surrendering and had no weapon on him. It doesn’t matter what happened 5 minutes earlier.
If home owners can be charged for chasing a burglar down the street, and the threat is deemed over, because there out of the house.
The homeowner is in trouble.
Apply the same standard.
I was horrified watching the video. After listening to what you said about what happened before the video began, it's appears to be revenge for the attack on the officers but that amount of violence towards the person on the ground was still very horrible
There's no justification for that officers actions. He'd lost control, and went on a rampage.
What has bugged me, is that the lad is now saying he's been left traumatised. Give me a break. He didn't care about traumatising the WPC when he smashed her nose, knocking her to the ground. He deserves jailing for attacking officers.
Agreed. Just because the police were wrong doesn't mean you're innocent.
It has not been shown that he was the person who assaulted the WPC , several others were arrested ; the young man ( he was only 19 ) was defending his mother against a violent racist attack ; the WPC may have been injured accidentally as a result of wading into an ongoing struggle , the exact nature of which , and who was involved , beyond her , have yet to be evidenced . These police all had tasers , rather than getting into hand to hand combat , they could have subdued the others with tasers and then only restrained them once subdued . This is all a matter of police not following their own training and making a hash of the whole thing .
@@derekheeps1244 where are the news reports of a racist attack?
@@derekheeps1244 I'd like to see the full body camera videos.
oh, really. Did you see video footage of that? If so, would you be so kind as to share that? There's a good fellow.
Antsy activists for the religion of permanent outrage were actually policed correctly for once. Instead the officer will now be thrown to the Wolves.
The mob of activists for the religion of permanent outrage that gathered outside Rochdale police station peacefully telling all that "they're lucky we haven't burnt the place down" "we want our brother's back now". "If our brothers don't get justice by tomorrow everyone in that place (copshop) is getting it"
How wonderful to see the non intimidating flexing by these paragons of virtue that have been selflessly enriching us all and providing us with great societal strength. Brothers and sisters we are blessed to live in such times
They removed him for fear of backlash.......but you'll still get backlash cuz it's them🏴🏴🏴