If someone hands you a gun, you're responsible with what you do with it. if you're reckless with it then it's not the responsibility of the person who handed you that gun. The person who handed you it may be held responsible if there was some reason you shouldn't have been handling a gun in the first place but you're not immune to the consequences of your negligence. The armorer was held liable for her actions that resulted in live ammo being in the area to begin with but baldwin is the one who aimed the gun and pulled the trigger and he should be held liable for those actions. This was a terrible accident (if you want to believe it was an accident) but just because he didnt' meant to kill someone doesn't change the fact that his actions did lead to the death of a person. There are a lot of people that have caused the deaths of others and didn't mean to do so. People are still held responsible for the results of their actions even if they didn't mean for those actions to cause harm.
25:17 Viva, a PROP GUN is NOT a 'Property of' gun (or who owns the gun). A prop gun is: "A prop gun is a gun or gun replica that is used primarily by movie and television productions or in theatre performances. As a prop, these guns can be divided into non-firing guns (replicas) and firing guns (firearms). Firearms are subject to restriction by law and safety regulations in use, due to their inherent danger." Not trying to be a know it all, just trying to help and this is the only way I know to quickly contact you. Great show !
Viva if you are going to watch this you should do some research into A gun safety and B laws pertaining to this. As the person holding the gun it was his responsibility to check it. Saying they wanted to make it look real is not a legal argument.I mean if he shot someone on purpose it would sure look real wouldn't it? He acted recklessly. Anyone in his situation with his experience would reasonably know that pointing a gun that you have not personally verified is unloaded at someone creates the possibility of this result. The armorer is not an accountant or lawyer, he doesn't get a reliance defense here He had the gun he failed to check that it was A clear or that it was B loaded with blanks or dummies and it is really easy to tell the difference by taking them out of the gun and checking them. He has no excuse, this isn't his first time on set with a gun he has talked about his vast experience with them more than once and how he would "never make that mistake" Much love Viva, but you are making yourself look like an idiot. You are not an idiot.
Why not train your darling dog to sit next to you when you go on? The price we pay for our dogs’ love is that they always want to be near us. That you go off to check on your dog shows that you are a man with a good heart. The barking in the background lends a sentimental quality to your video. I became a subscriber because of how kind you are to your dog.
@@thistles Agreed a rambunctious dog would be a distraction. A trained dog would sit quietly nearby. Please correct me if I’m wrong. I think there used to be a radio show host, Michael Savage who did his entire show with his Poodle, Teddy. sitting near him. Thank you for your remarks. It’s interesting to explore the different ways others enjoy watching the channel and their reasons behind their choices.
I mean I think there might have been some change in 600 years given that guns are Less prone to explode in your hand than in 1424 😂 but I get your point ❤
When i took firearms training the first thing they said is treat every gun as if it's loaded. Never point it at someone else. If this rule is followed you will still have people shooting others as they either accidentally or intentionally point the guns at other. Its simply there to reduce the number of times people point guns at each other and avoid cases exactly like this.
@@supernova743 yeah so to the OPs point, I suspect 600 years ago the 1st rule was more likely, don’t be stood anywhere near it - where it was pointing was probably rule #2 🤣🤣
Although I love learning legal points when watching trials, a point that attorneys covering them seem to forget is that we watch through the eyes of a juror and not a legal mind. I reserve the right to change my mind, but as of now im liking this prosecutor.
I sometimes touch my iPhone screen without feeling it, and I’m pretty young. It wouldn’t be surprising if a trigger was pulled and he didn’t think he pulled it
If the sear is damaged the hammer can move forward and strike the bullet. Guns have gone off when dropped or cocked and the hammer released. Baldwin was trying to claim early on that the gun was probably damaged but all testing to date has countered that claim.
Apparently defense is claiming the gun was modified to make it easier to pull the trigger, FBI "broke" the gun in testing so the state can't prove the gun couldn't go off accidentally.
I don't give a 🐀 🫏 if Alex didn't think there were live rounds on the set. My son, 12 at the time, used a real gun as a prop in community theater. The director, the owner of the gun, showed him how to check for chambered rounds and they both checked every time it was passed back and forth, even when it was in sight of both the entire time. That would be covered in the first 5 minutes of a gun safety class.
Scamala is about as popular as ebola.
THANK GOODNESS!!!👏👏
It’s a very boring trial, so we need YOU to pipe up!!
Glad it will just be you!!!!
No excuses, Baldwin should have learned what are real, blank, dummy rounds, checked the weapon, and DEFINITELY DON'T POINT IT AT SOMEONE!!!!
If someone hands you a gun, you're responsible with what you do with it. if you're reckless with it then it's not the responsibility of the person who handed you that gun. The person who handed you it may be held responsible if there was some reason you shouldn't have been handling a gun in the first place but you're not immune to the consequences of your negligence. The armorer was held liable for her actions that resulted in live ammo being in the area to begin with but baldwin is the one who aimed the gun and pulled the trigger and he should be held liable for those actions.
This was a terrible accident (if you want to believe it was an accident) but just because he didnt' meant to kill someone doesn't change the fact that his actions did lead to the death of a person. There are a lot of people that have caused the deaths of others and didn't mean to do so. People are still held responsible for the results of their actions even if they didn't mean for those actions to cause harm.
That piece with Jake tapper repeating what Biden said crack me up😊
@vivafrei it's called the Hoof GP
25:17 Viva, a PROP GUN is NOT a 'Property of' gun (or who owns the gun). A prop gun is: "A prop gun is a gun or gun replica that is used primarily by movie and television productions or in theatre performances. As a prop, these guns can be divided into non-firing guns (replicas) and firing guns (firearms). Firearms are subject to restriction by law and safety regulations in use, due to their inherent danger." Not trying to be a know it all, just trying to help and this is the only way I know to quickly contact you. Great show !
Even if it was a cold gun, why would he point it at her and pull the trigger?
I don’t want to think the lead singer of Blink182 as being in his 50s. It makes me feel old. Say it ain’t so!
Viva if you are going to watch this you should do some research into A gun safety and B laws pertaining to this. As the person holding the gun it was his responsibility to check it. Saying they wanted to make it look real is not a legal argument.I mean if he shot someone on purpose it would sure look real wouldn't it? He acted recklessly. Anyone in his situation with his experience would reasonably know that pointing a gun that you have not personally verified is unloaded at someone creates the possibility of this result. The armorer is not an accountant or lawyer, he doesn't get a reliance defense here He had the gun he failed to check that it was A clear or that it was B loaded with blanks or dummies and it is really easy to tell the difference by taking them out of the gun and checking them. He has no excuse, this isn't his first time on set with a gun he has talked about his vast experience with them more than once and how he would "never make that mistake" Much love Viva, but you are making yourself look like an idiot. You are not an idiot.
Why not train your darling dog to sit next to you when you go on? The price we pay for our dogs’ love is that they always want to be near us. That you go off to check on your dog shows that you are a man with a good heart. The barking in the background lends a sentimental quality to your video. I became a subscriber because of how kind you are to your dog.
Yes! Would LOVE to see that pup the whole show ❤
No thank you. Go sub to the Dodo or something if you want to look at dogs. They’re distracting in this context
@@thistles
Agreed a rambunctious dog would be a distraction. A trained dog would sit quietly nearby.
Please correct me if I’m wrong. I think there used to be a radio show host, Michael Savage who did his entire show with his Poodle, Teddy. sitting near him.
Thank you for your remarks. It’s interesting to explore the different ways others enjoy watching the channel and their reasons behind their choices.
Some one needs to show her the summer of love protests and the mostly peaceful protests with entire neighborhoods taken over or set ablaze and looted
J6 was a joke compared to the country wide “protests”
And people killed and wounded
Firearms safety rules are universal, simple and 100% fail safe. They have not changed in 600 years.
I mean I think there might have been some change in 600 years given that guns are
Less prone to explode in your hand than in 1424 😂 but I get your point ❤
Don't point the open end at anyone?
When i took firearms training the first thing they said is treat every gun as if it's loaded. Never point it at someone else.
If this rule is followed you will still have people shooting others as they either accidentally or intentionally point the guns at other. Its simply there to reduce the number of times people point guns at each other and avoid cases exactly like this.
@@supernova743 yeah so to the OPs point, I suspect 600 years ago the 1st rule was more likely, don’t be stood anywhere near it - where it was pointing was probably rule #2 🤣🤣
@@supernova743 I never killed anyone I wasn't trying to.
Shes using the old Johnny cochran 'Chewbacca defense'
Although I love learning legal points when watching trials, a point that attorneys covering them seem to forget is that we watch through the eyes of a juror and not a legal mind. I reserve the right to change my mind, but as of now im liking this prosecutor.
Blue on Blue infighting . Stock up on the popcorn. The next 5 months will be biblical.
The Insanity Continues......
I sometimes touch my iPhone screen without feeling it, and I’m pretty young. It wouldn’t be surprising if a trigger was pulled and he didn’t think he pulled it
Guns don't work like that ...
The opening broad needs to go to summer camp
Sorry Viva, but a revolver does NOT discharge on its own. The trigger has to be squeezed. Baldwin SHOT that poor Woman.
If the sear is damaged the hammer can move forward and strike the bullet. Guns have gone off when dropped or cocked and the hammer released. Baldwin was trying to claim early on that the gun was probably damaged but all testing to date has countered that claim.
Apparently defense is claiming the gun was modified to make it easier to pull the trigger, FBI "broke" the gun in testing so the state can't prove the gun couldn't go off accidentally.
Why is the defence on the far side? Is the jury on the far side too?
I don't give a 🐀 🫏 if Alex didn't think there were live rounds on the set. My son, 12 at the time, used a real gun as a prop in community theater. The director, the owner of the gun, showed him how to check for chambered rounds and they both checked every time it was passed back and forth, even when it was in sight of both the entire time. That would be covered in the first 5 minutes of a gun safety class.