Indrekk Pringi don’t be condescending, you know it’s the people with lower IQ’s that tend to overestimate their capabilities. There’s no need to be rude nor impertinent to the viewers (and the channel). Maybe try being encouraging, because people are taking an interest in such a great game - and not a prick... 🤔
In the desert You find some water no, first of all Agamator does a very good analysis of games for people with ratings in the range of 1200 to 1800, and he is a very good player himself. I agree that this analysis isn’t as deep, but is just as valuable for players with ratings
In the desert You find some water what does he do that makes chess profit orientated, and it’s a good thing that chess is becoming more popular - a trend is even better! I really struggle to believe your rating, firstly because your grammar is appalling, and secondly because if you can’t make a decent point and chess channel, how am I supposed to believe you can make a decent move in games?
As a super novice player, I didn't expect to learn anything from or even finish this video. However, I found your commentary of this excellent GM match to be very insightful and thorough. Thank you!
I had to stop the video and complement you for such a great play by play announcement. I’ve watched this clip a couple of times before and suddenly realized how you differ from everyone else who’s doing similar videos. You give viewers time to digest the moves and really speak the minds of the players who played the game. I think you’re as good a as it gets. Keep it up and can’t wait for another one of your chess videos.
@RoyalDevil3 I feel the same way. Even with openings that I don't typically play, it's interesting to see how a skilled player like Fischer can be so creative. Seems like all this pieces are always in harmony.
Thank you for these informative and high-quality videos. You are doing a true service to avid chess players like myself and just wanted to let you know how truly grateful we are for your help. I have watched many of these videos and all have truly been very easy to understand and helped me improve my game.
Thank you for these informative and high-quality viseos. You are doing a true service to avid chess players like myself and just wanted to let you know how truly grateful we are for your help. I have watched many of these videos and all have truly been very easy to understand and helped me improve my game.
Panno could've saved the game at 18:55 with Queen to G7- no matter what Bobby does he either loses more pieces or captures Panno's Queen with his, then Panno's King recaptures, the bishop of Bobby is forced back, and that saves the game.
It does hold mate off but white wins material. Bishop takes Knight on h7+. If the Queen takes Bishop, then Qxe6+ and wins the other knight and is 3 pawns up with more potential. If Kh8 or Kf8 then QxQ and after KxQ white can retreat the bishop and is 2 pawns up.
Jason Bailey no it doesn't save the game it just prolongs it . He lost the game as was said as soon as he moved his knight to the queen side . When u are a move behind fisher in this situation it's over
you should have mention at 19:24 that white can't move king to h1, because the continuation would be Qh4+ Kg2 Qxg4+ Ng3 Ne1+ and now if white moves Kh2 or Kg1, the black can repeat the check with knight having a draw, and if Kh1 Qf3+ black checkmates in 1 move
Very instructive. Thanks a lot Kevin for your excellent choice and commentary. You've got definitely the best chess channel on youtube. carry on the good job.
I've just started playing chess and I am losing the whole time. That's why I am watching this video. As you just said in the end. It is not about the obvious moves, it is about the best moves. I din't think about such things. You have done a great job explaining everything and also showing other options which could have been used! You helped me a lot in understanding chess :)
Analizing the play at 18:30 on black turn after white pawn is moved, i wonder why panno didnt move the pawn to E4- taking the bishop as the queen now guards the "outpost" in F6 for the white knight, the black queen woud then be shielded by the white pawn at G6 from the white queen. I believe this woud give black a chance to stop the white attack and reorganize the white bishop to D3. Any comments are appretiated.
@killergoku56 I might be mistaken but white can then play Bxh7+. The black king cannot retake because of the white queen and if the black retakes with Qxh7, then Bobby Fischer can play the nice move of Qxe7+, forking the king and knight and pulling ahead in material. If black does not recapture and moves his king somewhere else, white can pull his queen away and is up by 2 pawns in material.
Hey Kevin, thnx for all these amazing vids and lessons that you share. Your commentary is superb and I've learnt a lot from ur in-between analyses. Can you please share some nice games where opponents castle on opposite sides? Fischer's, if possible coz he's so creative. I find it really hard to write defining moves when my opponent goes and castles on the wrong side and I was planning to attack the other side.
Greetings from Croatia! Man, I've seen so many of your videos, and I just have to comment! They're videos are just so awesome, you give such a good analysis, and "at the same time" ( :D ), you'r explanations and the voice is very adjusted with the video and the game! I've learned a LOT from those videos, and expecially from those videos on your website. Thank you dude, you're the MAN! Good work, keep on rockin' ;)
Way old comment but I agree Especially if black was going to just exchange to offload pressure anyways. I feel like pawn to f6 exchanges would've been more favorable and left black more kingside to help defend, and have a semi open file for his rook. Looks like a way better position.
it's worth mentioning that after Bxg6 Black can reply Qg7, but it fails to Bxh7+!, Qxh7 and Qxe6+, winning the knight on c8, getting connected passed pawns and a winning position.
I think fischer would respond to f6 with exf6; then after Bxf6, Qe3 and the black-squared bishop is targeting the rook on f8 while there is a double attack on the pawn on e6. If black recaptures Nxf6, then fischer can exchange bishops and the g-pawn is pinned and subject to something like h5.
bc pawn on e5 will take and fischer would be up an easy pawn and black would have weakened position tremendously. Bishop on g7 cant take back bc of the pin to the rook
Maybe because Fischer is attacking his king and the only thing f6 accomplishes is weakening his king position. Hes already getting his dark squared bishop, a fantastic defensive piece, traded off, weaken his king further would not help anything.
Hi, thanks for your answer. I agree this weakens the e6 pawn, but I'm not so concerned about the g-pawn pin (if white moves pawn to h5 before the advancement of the f7 pawn, I also think the black g-pawn should not capture, so nothing has really changed). As you point out, Bxf6 has weaknesses so I think Nxf6 is the better move (Rxf6 is also a possibility that I haven't really explored, probably not good), providing opportunities to take the g4 pawn (which weakens White's entire rhs attack)...
Great game! Great commentary, too. Focused on the progress of the game itself, and not every instance of possible alternatives. I appreciate the simplicity, not being a great player myself. Thanks!
black's night to a5 at 8:00 i think was to prevent white's knight to b5, because then there was nothing stopping it going to d6 next move, where it would've been entrenched and able to cause great trouble. i'm curious if you have an idea why black didn't play pawn to f6 at 15:30? it would've shut down the white queen's involvement in the attack at the very least.
I posted some nitpicking things about some earlier play discussion, but so much time in this video was spent discussing minor issues that the blunder of 26...Qd8 is sortof glossed over. 26...Nf8 answers the queen by doing 3 things: 1) it protects the weak h pawn and the vulnerable g pawn; 2) it opens up the white squares should the bishop need to defend the weak f pawn; 3) it allows the queen to maintain an attack position while still allowing her to reposition if need be. It's simply a blunder.
Nf5 instead of Na5 is a good idea, but i'm pretty sure fischer would have played g4 immediately, and gotten his kingside attack rolling all the sooner. A kingside attack is always in the offing in the opening, that was part of the plan long before he plays g4.
omg Panno played like a patsi. His strategic awareness is disastrous, making terrible tactical blunders everywhere. For the video, I would have liked to see more positional analysis, rather than a pretty shallow commentary on the game.
I don't at all intend to sound like a "hater", because I appreciate you posting these videos. I think your analysis could be a little more in depth. We can't simplify the highly calculated, strategic moves of these GMs to "he wants to protect this spot". I get it if you are trying to do that for the "mainstream" non-avid chess fans, and that you can't please everybody, but, personally, I'd like to see a more in depth analysis. Thank you!
+Edward Danielyan Totally agree, simplyfying the motivation behind GM moves might bring more harm than good. One could get a false sense of being able to play like Bobby Fischer just by developing minor pieces and controlling center with nice moves. Anyway, thank you for sharing the great games.
Yeah, good point ! But then these videos could become 3/4 hour long which would become too boring and a waste of time. We have game books for that. Personnaly, I prefer the 14-25 minutes format. Life's too short !
At 7:15 when talking about the move that black should have made... I feel like the suggestion of moving the knight from e7 to f5 would have meant some problems for black. Right after white could have moved the bishop on f4 to g5 and put some frustrating pressure on black's queen. Either potentially taking it as it would lack legitimate defense or forcing him to follow white's lead. I'm a chess novice so I'm asking this question more for my own knowledge than an actual critique.
holy crap, I'm just randomly going around UA-cam and come across this commentary. I now love chess...... when there's commentary. Its like watching starcraft matches with amazing commentary. If I'm playing, I still suck. Thanks chesswebsite dude.
Tal, and Kasparov. I don't deny Fishers genius, but in the end he died a raving lunatic, with a hatred towards the USA; a country that both supported him and celebrated him in his early career. And this blind hatred towards the U.S. extended to others as well, which does not speak well of him as a great man.
+David Najor Perhaps he did but all we are talking about is chess. Not Fischer's personal life, interests and shit. Just chess. And that's where he is the best, there is no one in his right mind who would state otherwise
Pure BS! I said that I didn't deny his genius, but he was not the best that ever was, and he did lose at times to certain others. Just how much do you know about some of the past great champions after all, or are you one of those juvenile people who just fell under the spell of his name alone. So don't try to lecture me about this subject when it comes to certain others of legendary status.
David Najor if you had any sense of morality you would hate America too and you wouldn't be so proud of that American flag. Also, Fischer was better than Tal and Kasparov
This guy is far too talkative. I prefer Mato in his version of some of these great chess matches. Far less annoying, and prolonging. It totally takes away from the rhythm of the game.
+David Najor I appreciate his commentary. I feel it helps me bettery understand the game. I can see why someone more familiar with the nuances of the game would prefer less talking, but for those of us lower on the level of understanding having someone discuss a match as two grandmasters play can be very beneficial.
+David Najor Different kind of videos. If you are looking for short ones then mato is great. But this guy and kingscrusher are good for the longer ones.
+Troy Hallewell My thoughts exactly. I've recently got into chess and looking to take in as much commentary as I can to further understand the game, the plays, etc. This prolonged commentary is very beneficial indeed.
... and N to e4 might become a possibility in the future too. But generally I think this makes all of Black's pieces more active: once the knight moves, the bishop and queen are converging on the d4 pawn, the f8 rook is now attacking the f-line (knight and pawn), f2 pawn looks like it could be vulnerable down the road, etc,
Thanks for this game. This opening looks very similar to one that I use from time to time although not with the same results as Mr. Fischer. Thanks for posting.
I really like your videos, you do an amazing job not only explaining what happened but what could have happened. I believe that's what sets you apart from others as that's what many people wonder in chess what could have been done differently.
@city12chania If Fischer moves his Knight at f3 he lefts his d4 pawn unprotected under the attack of the queen that easily can enter trough the great defence that Fischer has, and the treat of the knight can easily be defended by Nf6.
the fianchetto prevents this move from being effective. if the bishop comes to g5, pawn to h6 kicks the bishop back to h4, and then pawn to g5 wins the bishop. essentially you would be moving your bishop to pin, and then moving it back immediately after.
@gordieorr you talking about 19:37? Because he wouldn't have moved his queen in front of the king. The knight on H5 would just take it like you said. Panno would have moved his king to F8. If the king is on F8 Fischer wouldn't have any strong attacking moves.
Well, I'm running an analysis on it now. Looks like the optimal path after Qg7 starts with: BxN+ Kf8 Qf6+ QxQ PxQ Nd6 g5 Nf7 g6 Nh6 Nh5 Bd7 Nf4 ..... Analysis isn't complete (or at least as complete as it can get) but it looks like at best, Panno can delay Fisher's passed pawns and maybe get a draw. Given Fisher's demonstrated ability to coordinate his pieces, I doubt Panno could have pulled it off.
at 8:40 i think fischer played b3 not because he was afraid of the pawn marching up the board, if he was then he would have played b4. instead he played b3 to stop blacks knight getting to the c4 square and forcing it to go back or be stuck at the side of the board, Rc8 also helped to prepare this b3 move. Great Video, good analysis.
Briefly pausing at 13:51 to set this up on a real board. Holy shit when you look at Fischers "hammering down the furniture" approach to the opening. Absolutely inescapable strength.
Actually that move doesn't limit the queen's involvement. It only weakens black's defense for the king. If you run through the moves in your head, it seems that once f6 is played, PxP, and then BxP, the queen is kicked to f4, bishop moves back to defend rook, and then queen winds up back on g5. only now, rook e6 is threatened, and pawn h5 becomes much more powerful given the smaller support of the black king's pawn.
b3 was actually to prevent Nc4 which would be an aweasome outpost for the knight...and the Na5 was to allow the move b5 since the bishop would now defend the ´pawn from the white knight...black has to attack on the queen side since the middle is closed and on the king side he has no opportunities
I think this game may be prettier than Game 6 - Anyone agree? The final 3 moves, the order in which he decided to execute the final line - it is just as though he had painted a perfect portrait.
@Darxsys Yeah it's a shortcut for positional pressure. Perhaps commentator might want to specify tactical pressure positional pressure, or use some other set of words, but it's hard not to use the shortcut.
Bobby Fischer the results is from 1970 blitz 2991 elo rating.But in 1992 against a weak Spassky 2598 elo rating the world ranking 167th.Fischer the result in 1992 was only 2657 elo rating world ranking 78th.Fische was the world number one from 1966 to 1972.Magnus Carlsen scored 2991 rating in London 2012 the same as Fischer in blitz 1970
@apredol because then white bishop would take black knight at h7 then black queen would take white bishop at h7 then white queen would take pawn on e6 with check and there is no option for black to defend the black knight wich is being attack by the check move
What I like most about Bobby Fischer's games is the way he makes his pieces work as a team. Even in a closed position like that, the pieces seemed to help each other in the attack.
to stop the queen attacking. can push the pawn in order to stop the queen after trading rooks. my point is white wouldn't bring the queen back to g5 because it is easily threatened by the bishop again. the queen's involvement on the side would not be able to continue.
"He doesn´t look for the obvious moves, he looks for the best move", what a wonderful phrase!
😆
😆
Your commentaries, compared to others who upload chess commentaries, are the easiest to understand! Please keep uploading, you have my sub :D
That's because it is the STUPIDEST analysis I've ever heard.
It's easier for stupid people to understand when the analysis is dumbed down.
Indrekk Pringi don’t be condescending, you know it’s the people with lower IQ’s that tend to overestimate their capabilities. There’s no need to be rude nor impertinent to the viewers (and the channel). Maybe try being encouraging, because people are taking an interest in such a great game - and not a prick... 🤔
In the desert You find some water you too, less of the condescension...
In the desert You find some water no, first of all Agamator does a very good analysis of games for people with ratings in the range of 1200 to 1800, and he is a very good player himself. I agree that this analysis isn’t as deep, but is just as valuable for players with ratings
In the desert You find some water what does he do that makes chess profit orientated, and it’s a good thing that chess is becoming more popular - a trend is even better! I really struggle to believe your rating, firstly because your grammar is appalling, and secondly because if you can’t make a decent point and chess channel, how am I supposed to believe you can make a decent move in games?
@Zombiebrainstew thanks for this. can't make everyone happy, but glad to see the vast majority like the commentary.
As a super novice player, I didn't expect to learn anything from or even finish this video. However, I found your commentary of this excellent GM match to be very insightful and thorough. Thank you!
That's Kevin's skill but also the straightforward and unforgiving attack Fischer was know for
B
I loved this game and thoroughly enjoyed the presentation. Thanks for sharing!
I had to stop the video and complement you for such a great play by play announcement. I’ve watched this clip a couple of times before and suddenly realized how you differ from everyone else who’s doing similar videos. You give viewers time to digest the moves and really speak the minds of the players who played the game. I think you’re as good a as it gets. Keep it up and can’t wait for another one of your chess videos.
I'm not good at chess, but this was fun to watch!
However good you are, I'm a whole lot worse.
Me too
:(
@RoyalDevil3 I feel the same way. Even with openings that I don't typically play, it's interesting to see how a skilled player like Fischer can be so creative. Seems like all this pieces are always in harmony.
16:46
"Oh, crap. Bobby Fischer is attacking my kingside,"
LOLOL
kespoon HAHAHAHA
Bobby Got into the Game, and Put a lot of Pressure on Black's Kingside!
Man that's one of the best chess videos I've ever seen - great game and highly instructive commentary, superb !!!
I'm a beginner and I love your videos. It has improved my game alot.
i love how you give little tips while the play goes through and also explain what’s behind each move. VERY much appreciate it! thanks again!
brilliant, feels like Fischer was in control the whole game leaving hardly any breathing space for Panno
Luvish a triple true pro
Thank you for these informative and high-quality videos. You are doing a true service to avid chess players like myself and just wanted to let you know how truly grateful we are for your help. I have watched many of these videos and all have truly been very easy to understand and helped me improve my game.
8:18 "...trying to get some action on the queen side."
I chuckled.
@iLepReconi glad to hear so many people are learning so much from the videos. I will keep making them if people keep enjoying them.
Wow, my first time watching Fischer. It seemed like he was consistently in control the entire game. It seemed like Panno never had a chance
Thank you for these informative and high-quality viseos. You are doing a true service to avid chess players like myself and just wanted to let you know how truly grateful we are for your help. I have watched many of these videos and all have truly been very easy to understand and helped me improve my game.
Panno could've saved the game at 18:55 with Queen to G7- no matter what Bobby does he either loses more pieces or captures Panno's Queen with his, then Panno's King recaptures, the bishop of Bobby is forced back, and that saves the game.
It does hold mate off but white wins material. Bishop takes Knight on h7+. If the Queen takes Bishop, then Qxe6+ and wins the other knight and is 3 pawns up with more potential. If Kh8 or Kf8 then QxQ and after KxQ white can retreat the bishop and is 2 pawns up.
Jason - Is this TRUE? It's an OUTRAGE! I want my money back!
Jason Bailey no it doesn't save the game it just prolongs it . He lost the game as was said as soon as he moved his knight to the queen side . When u are a move behind fisher in this situation it's over
Makes you wonder why a strong grandmaster couldnt see a move that wouldnt just equalize but win the game
you should have mention at 19:24 that white can't move king to h1, because the continuation would be Qh4+ Kg2 Qxg4+ Ng3 Ne1+ and now if white moves Kh2 or Kg1, the black can repeat the check with knight having a draw, and if Kh1 Qf3+ black checkmates in 1 move
Can you pleaseeeee upload more Bobby Fischer matches? These are all really great.
Mind reading
Since my high school days we back 1973 i already started watching games played by bobby fisher really amazing moves.
Very instructive. Thanks a lot Kevin for your excellent choice and commentary. You've got definitely the best chess channel on youtube. carry on the good job.
I've just started playing chess and I am losing the whole time. That's why I am watching this video. As you just said in the end. It is not about the obvious moves, it is about the best moves. I din't think about such things. You have done a great job explaining everything and also showing other options which could have been used! You helped me a lot in understanding chess :)
I just love the way you explain the why´s of each move, it has giving me a complete new insight in a matter of minutes, thank you! Subscribed.
Awesome explanation of the game very fun to watch nice work
Analizing the play at 18:30 on black turn after white pawn is moved, i wonder why panno didnt move the pawn to E4- taking the bishop as the queen now guards the "outpost" in F6 for the white knight, the black queen woud then be shielded by the white pawn at G6 from the white queen. I believe this woud give black a chance to stop the white attack and reorganize the white bishop to D3. Any comments are appretiated.
around the 9 minute mark im sure Fischer wanted to block Nc4 with the pb3 move
@killergoku56 I might be mistaken but white can then play Bxh7+. The black king cannot retake because of the white queen and if the black retakes with Qxh7, then Bobby Fischer can play the nice move of Qxe7+, forking the king and knight and pulling ahead in material. If black does not recapture and moves his king somewhere else, white can pull his queen away and is up by 2 pawns in material.
That was a great game. Thanks for uploading it.
Hey Kevin, thnx for all these amazing vids and lessons that you share. Your commentary is superb and I've learnt a lot from ur in-between analyses. Can you please share some nice games where opponents castle on opposite sides? Fischer's, if possible coz he's so creative. I find it really hard to write defining moves when my opponent goes and castles on the wrong side and I was planning to attack the other side.
Kevin, what software are you using?
Thanks
Ryan
Greetings from Croatia!
Man, I've seen so many of your videos, and I just have to comment!
They're videos are just so awesome, you give such a good analysis, and "at the same time" ( :D ), you'r explanations and the voice is very adjusted with the video and the game!
I've learned a LOT from those videos, and expecially from those videos on your website.
Thank you dude, you're the MAN!
Good work, keep on rockin' ;)
at 15.06 why black didn't play pawn to f6? I am very curious Panno didn't.
Way old comment but I agree
Especially if black was going to just exchange to offload pressure anyways. I feel like pawn to f6 exchanges would've been more favorable and left black more kingside to help defend, and have a semi open file for his rook. Looks like a way better position.
it's worth mentioning that after Bxg6 Black can reply Qg7, but it fails to Bxh7+!, Qxh7 and Qxe6+, winning the knight on c8, getting connected passed pawns and a winning position.
Great game +great explanation(beginners will become masters with this kind of explanations)
Love the videos keep them coming! Always nice to watch comentated matches, helps me learn a lot whilst enjoying it. Keep up the good work Kevin.
19:36 some amazing moves in there!!!
I think fischer would respond to f6 with exf6; then after Bxf6, Qe3 and the black-squared bishop is targeting the rook on f8 while there is a double attack on the pawn on e6. If black recaptures Nxf6, then fischer can exchange bishops and the g-pawn is pinned and subject to something like h5.
Anybody know why Black didn't move pon to F6 at 15:36?
becouse Fischer would just eat it with this pawn that is at e5
No bobby wouldn't do that because the pawn om e5 is important minor pieces
maybe he will move queen to f4
bc pawn on e5 will take and fischer would be up an easy pawn and black would have weakened position tremendously. Bishop on g7 cant take back bc of the pin to the rook
MarcusCism
K’
Maybe because Fischer is attacking his king and the only thing f6 accomplishes is weakening his king position. Hes already getting his dark squared bishop, a fantastic defensive piece, traded off, weaken his king further would not help anything.
Hi, thanks for your answer. I agree this weakens the e6 pawn, but I'm not so concerned about the g-pawn pin (if white moves pawn to h5 before the advancement of the f7 pawn, I also think the black g-pawn should not capture, so nothing has really changed).
As you point out, Bxf6 has weaknesses so I think Nxf6 is the better move (Rxf6 is also a possibility that I haven't really explored, probably not good), providing opportunities to take the g4 pawn (which weakens White's entire rhs attack)...
Great game! Great commentary, too. Focused on the progress of the game itself, and not every instance of possible alternatives. I appreciate the simplicity, not being a great player myself. Thanks!
Nice commentary... again !
BTW good choice with this game where BF once again is mastering the noble art of chess !
Pleasure watching a legend play and annihilate a player of GM stature I salute the legend Bobby Fisher
Na5 was just made to allow Bb5, putting some pressure as you said but maybe he didnt consider the loss of time it eventually brought.
Great end game. Damn
Comment deleted. You are REALLY rude.
Cubby Windows D Fuck off
Taylor Huizenga The black should take the white horse by bishop to utilize it usefully in the game?
Ahmed Baigpppp
black's night to a5 at 8:00 i think was to prevent white's knight to b5, because then there was nothing stopping it going to d6 next move, where it would've been entrenched and able to cause great trouble.
i'm curious if you have an idea why black didn't play pawn to f6 at 15:30? it would've shut down the white queen's involvement in the attack at the very least.
u can be a better player, just by watching this guy's commentaries
I posted some nitpicking things about some earlier play discussion, but so much time in this video was spent discussing minor issues that the blunder of 26...Qd8 is sortof glossed over. 26...Nf8 answers the queen by doing 3 things: 1) it protects the weak h pawn and the vulnerable g pawn; 2) it opens up the white squares should the bishop need to defend the weak f pawn; 3) it allows the queen to maintain an attack position while still allowing her to reposition if need be. It's simply a blunder.
Bobby Fisher... Bobby Fisher.... Bobby Fisher.... BOBBBBYYYY FISSSHHHERRR... yeah :)
But seriously, they guy was a genius... always inspiring.
Nf5 instead of Na5 is a good idea, but i'm pretty sure fischer would have played g4 immediately, and gotten his kingside attack rolling all the sooner. A kingside attack is always in the offing in the opening, that was part of the plan long before he plays g4.
Same Ting
@Boorsu agreed.
Bobby Fischer is indeed a great chess player
The greatest f all time
was
@@Cwra1smith His games live on, as does his greatness.
I think that's the key is to make the pieces work in harmony likes notes in a symphony.
omg Panno played like a patsi. His strategic awareness is disastrous, making terrible tactical blunders everywhere. For the video, I would have liked to see more positional analysis, rather than a pretty shallow commentary on the game.
I would like to see you lose ya virginity. Never gunna happen.
hey bro you can't lose what never mattered heh heh
Nice game by Fischer. Thanks for posting, Buddy.
I don't at all intend to sound like a "hater", because I appreciate you posting these videos. I think your analysis could be a little more in depth. We can't simplify the highly calculated, strategic moves of these GMs to "he wants to protect this spot". I get it if you are trying to do that for the "mainstream" non-avid chess fans, and that you can't please everybody, but, personally, I'd like to see a more in depth analysis. Thank you!
+Edward Danielyan Totally agree, simplyfying the motivation behind GM moves might bring more harm than good. One could get a false sense of being able to play like Bobby Fischer just by developing minor pieces and controlling center with nice moves.
Anyway, thank you for sharing the great games.
Yeah, good point !
But then these videos could become 3/4 hour long which would become too boring and a waste of time.
We have game books for that.
Personnaly, I prefer the 14-25 minutes format.
Life's too short !
At 7:15 when talking about the move that black should have made... I feel like the suggestion of moving the knight from e7 to f5 would have meant some problems for black. Right after white could have moved the bishop on f4 to g5 and put some frustrating pressure on black's queen. Either potentially taking it as it would lack legitimate defense or forcing him to follow white's lead.
I'm a chess novice so I'm asking this question more for my own knowledge than an actual critique.
You explain Fischer's games like a middle school student.
Good one man, you really showed him
If that is an offensive comment then go say that to someone else that's not cool man
+Martin Hyizna You comment like a middle school student
Why don't you show us how to do it then?
Martin Hyizna you make a UA-cam channel and get over 100k subs
holy crap, I'm just randomly going around UA-cam and come across this commentary.
I now love chess...... when there's commentary.
Its like watching starcraft matches with amazing commentary.
If I'm playing, I still suck.
Thanks chesswebsite dude.
Tal, and Kasparov. I don't deny Fishers genius, but in the end he died a raving lunatic, with a hatred towards the USA; a country that both supported him and celebrated him in his early career. And this blind hatred towards the U.S. extended to others as well, which does not speak well of him as a great man.
+David Najor You're right. He should have appreciated the U.S.'s bombing innocent civilians for economic and political reasons more.
+David Najor Perhaps he did but all we are talking about is chess. Not Fischer's personal life, interests and shit. Just chess. And that's where he is the best, there is no one in his right mind who would state otherwise
Pure BS! I said that I didn't deny his genius, but he was not the best that ever was, and he did lose at times to certain others. Just how much do you know about some of the past great champions after all, or are you one of those juvenile people who just fell under the spell of his name alone. So don't try to lecture me about this subject when it comes to certain others of legendary status.
David Najor if you had any sense of morality you would hate America too and you wouldn't be so proud of that American flag. Also, Fischer was better than Tal and Kasparov
He'd be a riot if he was schizo-affective
Excellent as always Kevin
This guy is far too talkative. I prefer Mato in his version of some of these great chess matches. Far less annoying, and prolonging. It totally takes away from the rhythm of the game.
+David Najor I appreciate his commentary. I feel it helps me bettery understand the game. I can see why someone more familiar with the nuances of the game would prefer less talking, but for those of us lower on the level of understanding having someone discuss a match as two grandmasters play can be very beneficial.
+David Najor Different kind of videos. If you are looking for short ones then mato is great. But this guy and kingscrusher are good for the longer ones.
+Troy Hallewell My thoughts exactly. I've recently got into chess and looking to take in as much commentary as I can to further understand the game, the plays, etc. This prolonged commentary is very beneficial indeed.
Outstanding play and also commentry
... and N to e4 might become a possibility in the future too. But generally I think this makes all of Black's pieces more active: once the knight moves, the bishop and queen are converging on the d4 pawn, the f8 rook is now attacking the f-line (knight and pawn), f2 pawn looks like it could be vulnerable down the road, etc,
Thanks for this game. This opening looks very similar to one that I use from time to time although not with the same results as Mr. Fischer.
Thanks for posting.
I really like your videos, you do an amazing job not only explaining what happened but what could have happened. I believe that's what sets you apart from others as that's what many people wonder in chess what could have been done differently.
@city12chania
If Fischer moves his Knight at f3 he lefts his d4 pawn unprotected under the attack of the queen that easily can enter trough the great defence that Fischer has, and the treat of the knight can easily be defended by Nf6.
the fianchetto prevents this move from being effective. if the bishop comes to g5, pawn to h6 kicks the bishop back to h4, and then pawn to g5 wins the bishop. essentially you would be moving your bishop to pin, and then moving it back immediately after.
wow..that knight to f6 really was beautiful...I appreciate that move so much..
@gordieorr you talking about 19:37? Because he wouldn't have moved his queen in front of the king. The knight on H5 would just take it like you said. Panno would have moved his king to F8. If the king is on F8 Fischer wouldn't have any strong attacking moves.
@jonsploder it is a strong defender of a critical square in Fischer's attack plan
Brilliant commentary! Get you hooked
Well, I'm running an analysis on it now. Looks like the optimal path after Qg7 starts with:
BxN+ Kf8
Qf6+ QxQ
PxQ Nd6
g5 Nf7
g6 Nh6
Nh5 Bd7
Nf4 .....
Analysis isn't complete (or at least as complete as it can get) but it looks like at best, Panno can delay Fisher's passed pawns and maybe get a draw. Given Fisher's demonstrated ability to coordinate his pieces, I doubt Panno could have pulled it off.
at 8:40 i think fischer played b3 not because he was afraid of the pawn marching up the board, if he was then he would have played b4. instead he played b3 to stop blacks knight getting to the c4 square and forcing it to go back or be stuck at the side of the board, Rc8 also helped to prepare this b3 move. Great Video, good analysis.
Briefly pausing at 13:51 to set this up on a real board. Holy shit when you look at Fischers "hammering down the furniture" approach to the opening. Absolutely inescapable strength.
I never understood why Panno never played bishop to d3 at any point after g3-g4 by white
Actually that move doesn't limit the queen's involvement. It only weakens black's defense for the king. If you run through the moves in your head, it seems that once f6 is played, PxP, and then BxP, the queen is kicked to f4, bishop moves back to defend rook, and then queen winds up back on g5. only now, rook e6 is threatened, and pawn h5 becomes much more powerful given the smaller support of the black king's pawn.
WOW thats great, thanks for explaining and analyzing the moves Kevin.
b3 was actually to prevent Nc4 which would be an aweasome outpost for the knight...and the Na5 was to allow the move b5 since the bishop would now defend the ´pawn from the white knight...black has to attack on the queen side since the middle is closed and on the king side he has no opportunities
I am incredibly proud that i saw the combinations leading to the win for white from 16:42, my calculation has improved! :D
I think this game may be prettier than Game 6 - Anyone agree? The final 3 moves, the order in which he decided to execute the final line - it is just as though he had painted a perfect portrait.
Love your videos brother
Fantastic and amazing move's played by bobby fischer truely artistic final move's which he played. Great video
@Darxsys yes, they never put a little bit of pressure.. another one. "as you can see ..."
@Darxsys Yeah it's a shortcut for positional pressure. Perhaps commentator might want to specify tactical pressure positional pressure, or use some other set of words, but it's hard not to use the shortcut.
Great as usual, very good comments. best site on chess, by far!
he meant 1 move earlier, when the knight was still at g3.
even if checkmate is avoided, the pawn on f6 will promote so it will be with two queens.
Bobby Fischer the results is from 1970 blitz 2991 elo rating.But in 1992 against a weak Spassky 2598 elo rating the world ranking 167th.Fischer the result in 1992 was only 2657 elo rating world ranking 78th.Fische was the world number one from 1966 to 1972.Magnus Carlsen scored 2991 rating in London 2012 the same as Fischer in blitz 1970
The advancing of pawn to g7 was a daring and tctical love. This pawn was there at the end of the game.
"There is no need to bring the bishop to G5" at 6:36, nice explanation...
Thank you for these videos and sharing your insight.
He is teaching his pawns to round-house kick.
@apredol
because then white bishop would take black knight at h7 then black queen would take white bishop at h7 then white queen would take pawn on e6 with check and there is no option for black to defend the black knight wich is being attack by the check move
What I like most about Bobby Fischer's games is the way he makes his pieces work as a team. Even in a closed position like that, the pieces seemed to help each other in the attack.
Great game from Bobby. Thanks
These kind of videos give me great experience and inspiration!
to stop the queen attacking. can push the pawn in order to stop the queen after trading rooks. my point is white wouldn't bring the queen back to g5 because it is easily threatened by the bishop again. the queen's involvement on the side would not be able to continue.
Cool video - thanks for the upload!