Indrekk Pringi don’t be condescending, you know it’s the people with lower IQ’s that tend to overestimate their capabilities. There’s no need to be rude nor impertinent to the viewers (and the channel). Maybe try being encouraging, because people are taking an interest in such a great game - and not a prick... 🤔
In the desert You find some water no, first of all Agamator does a very good analysis of games for people with ratings in the range of 1200 to 1800, and he is a very good player himself. I agree that this analysis isn’t as deep, but is just as valuable for players with ratings
In the desert You find some water what does he do that makes chess profit orientated, and it’s a good thing that chess is becoming more popular - a trend is even better! I really struggle to believe your rating, firstly because your grammar is appalling, and secondly because if you can’t make a decent point and chess channel, how am I supposed to believe you can make a decent move in games?
As a super novice player, I didn't expect to learn anything from or even finish this video. However, I found your commentary of this excellent GM match to be very insightful and thorough. Thank you!
I had to stop the video and complement you for such a great play by play announcement. I’ve watched this clip a couple of times before and suddenly realized how you differ from everyone else who’s doing similar videos. You give viewers time to digest the moves and really speak the minds of the players who played the game. I think you’re as good a as it gets. Keep it up and can’t wait for another one of your chess videos.
bc pawn on e5 will take and fischer would be up an easy pawn and black would have weakened position tremendously. Bishop on g7 cant take back bc of the pin to the rook
Maybe because Fischer is attacking his king and the only thing f6 accomplishes is weakening his king position. Hes already getting his dark squared bishop, a fantastic defensive piece, traded off, weaken his king further would not help anything.
Thank you for these informative and high-quality videos. You are doing a true service to avid chess players like myself and just wanted to let you know how truly grateful we are for your help. I have watched many of these videos and all have truly been very easy to understand and helped me improve my game.
Panno could've saved the game at 18:55 with Queen to G7- no matter what Bobby does he either loses more pieces or captures Panno's Queen with his, then Panno's King recaptures, the bishop of Bobby is forced back, and that saves the game.
It does hold mate off but white wins material. Bishop takes Knight on h7+. If the Queen takes Bishop, then Qxe6+ and wins the other knight and is 3 pawns up with more potential. If Kh8 or Kf8 then QxQ and after KxQ white can retreat the bishop and is 2 pawns up.
Jason Bailey no it doesn't save the game it just prolongs it . He lost the game as was said as soon as he moved his knight to the queen side . When u are a move behind fisher in this situation it's over
Very instructive. Thanks a lot Kevin for your excellent choice and commentary. You've got definitely the best chess channel on youtube. carry on the good job.
I really like your videos, you do an amazing job not only explaining what happened but what could have happened. I believe that's what sets you apart from others as that's what many people wonder in chess what could have been done differently.
I've just started playing chess and I am losing the whole time. That's why I am watching this video. As you just said in the end. It is not about the obvious moves, it is about the best moves. I din't think about such things. You have done a great job explaining everything and also showing other options which could have been used! You helped me a lot in understanding chess :)
Way old comment but I agree Especially if black was going to just exchange to offload pressure anyways. I feel like pawn to f6 exchanges would've been more favorable and left black more kingside to help defend, and have a semi open file for his rook. Looks like a way better position.
Great game! Great commentary, too. Focused on the progress of the game itself, and not every instance of possible alternatives. I appreciate the simplicity, not being a great player myself. Thanks!
Greetings from Croatia! Man, I've seen so many of your videos, and I just have to comment! They're videos are just so awesome, you give such a good analysis, and "at the same time" ( :D ), you'r explanations and the voice is very adjusted with the video and the game! I've learned a LOT from those videos, and expecially from those videos on your website. Thank you dude, you're the MAN! Good work, keep on rockin' ;)
Thank you for these informative and high-quality viseos. You are doing a true service to avid chess players like myself and just wanted to let you know how truly grateful we are for your help. I have watched many of these videos and all have truly been very easy to understand and helped me improve my game.
I don't at all intend to sound like a "hater", because I appreciate you posting these videos. I think your analysis could be a little more in depth. We can't simplify the highly calculated, strategic moves of these GMs to "he wants to protect this spot". I get it if you are trying to do that for the "mainstream" non-avid chess fans, and that you can't please everybody, but, personally, I'd like to see a more in depth analysis. Thank you!
+Edward Danielyan Totally agree, simplyfying the motivation behind GM moves might bring more harm than good. One could get a false sense of being able to play like Bobby Fischer just by developing minor pieces and controlling center with nice moves. Anyway, thank you for sharing the great games.
Yeah, good point ! But then these videos could become 3/4 hour long which would become too boring and a waste of time. We have game books for that. Personnaly, I prefer the 14-25 minutes format. Life's too short !
@RoyalDevil3 I feel the same way. Even with openings that I don't typically play, it's interesting to see how a skilled player like Fischer can be so creative. Seems like all this pieces are always in harmony.
omg Panno played like a patsi. His strategic awareness is disastrous, making terrible tactical blunders everywhere. For the video, I would have liked to see more positional analysis, rather than a pretty shallow commentary on the game.
Tal, and Kasparov. I don't deny Fishers genius, but in the end he died a raving lunatic, with a hatred towards the USA; a country that both supported him and celebrated him in his early career. And this blind hatred towards the U.S. extended to others as well, which does not speak well of him as a great man.
+David Najor Perhaps he did but all we are talking about is chess. Not Fischer's personal life, interests and shit. Just chess. And that's where he is the best, there is no one in his right mind who would state otherwise
Pure BS! I said that I didn't deny his genius, but he was not the best that ever was, and he did lose at times to certain others. Just how much do you know about some of the past great champions after all, or are you one of those juvenile people who just fell under the spell of his name alone. So don't try to lecture me about this subject when it comes to certain others of legendary status.
David Najor if you had any sense of morality you would hate America too and you wouldn't be so proud of that American flag. Also, Fischer was better than Tal and Kasparov
This guy is far too talkative. I prefer Mato in his version of some of these great chess matches. Far less annoying, and prolonging. It totally takes away from the rhythm of the game.
+David Najor I appreciate his commentary. I feel it helps me bettery understand the game. I can see why someone more familiar with the nuances of the game would prefer less talking, but for those of us lower on the level of understanding having someone discuss a match as two grandmasters play can be very beneficial.
+David Najor Different kind of videos. If you are looking for short ones then mato is great. But this guy and kingscrusher are good for the longer ones.
+Troy Hallewell My thoughts exactly. I've recently got into chess and looking to take in as much commentary as I can to further understand the game, the plays, etc. This prolonged commentary is very beneficial indeed.
What I like most about Bobby Fischer's games is the way he makes his pieces work as a team. Even in a closed position like that, the pieces seemed to help each other in the attack.
holy crap, I'm just randomly going around UA-cam and come across this commentary. I now love chess...... when there's commentary. Its like watching starcraft matches with amazing commentary. If I'm playing, I still suck. Thanks chesswebsite dude.
Briefly pausing at 13:51 to set this up on a real board. Holy shit when you look at Fischers "hammering down the furniture" approach to the opening. Absolutely inescapable strength.
Hey Kevin, thnx for all these amazing vids and lessons that you share. Your commentary is superb and I've learnt a lot from ur in-between analyses. Can you please share some nice games where opponents castle on opposite sides? Fischer's, if possible coz he's so creative. I find it really hard to write defining moves when my opponent goes and castles on the wrong side and I was planning to attack the other side.
Thanks for this game. This opening looks very similar to one that I use from time to time although not with the same results as Mr. Fischer. Thanks for posting.
"He doesn´t look for the obvious moves, he looks for the best move", what a wonderful phrase!
😆
😆
Your commentaries, compared to others who upload chess commentaries, are the easiest to understand! Please keep uploading, you have my sub :D
That's because it is the STUPIDEST analysis I've ever heard.
It's easier for stupid people to understand when the analysis is dumbed down.
Indrekk Pringi don’t be condescending, you know it’s the people with lower IQ’s that tend to overestimate their capabilities. There’s no need to be rude nor impertinent to the viewers (and the channel). Maybe try being encouraging, because people are taking an interest in such a great game - and not a prick... 🤔
In the desert You find some water you too, less of the condescension...
In the desert You find some water no, first of all Agamator does a very good analysis of games for people with ratings in the range of 1200 to 1800, and he is a very good player himself. I agree that this analysis isn’t as deep, but is just as valuable for players with ratings
In the desert You find some water what does he do that makes chess profit orientated, and it’s a good thing that chess is becoming more popular - a trend is even better! I really struggle to believe your rating, firstly because your grammar is appalling, and secondly because if you can’t make a decent point and chess channel, how am I supposed to believe you can make a decent move in games?
@iLepReconi glad to hear so many people are learning so much from the videos. I will keep making them if people keep enjoying them.
As a super novice player, I didn't expect to learn anything from or even finish this video. However, I found your commentary of this excellent GM match to be very insightful and thorough. Thank you!
That's Kevin's skill but also the straightforward and unforgiving attack Fischer was know for
B
brilliant, feels like Fischer was in control the whole game leaving hardly any breathing space for Panno
Luvish a triple true pro
I'm not good at chess, but this was fun to watch!
However good you are, I'm a whole lot worse.
Me too
:(
@Zombiebrainstew thanks for this. can't make everyone happy, but glad to see the vast majority like the commentary.
I loved this game and thoroughly enjoyed the presentation. Thanks for sharing!
16:46
"Oh, crap. Bobby Fischer is attacking my kingside,"
LOLOL
kespoon HAHAHAHA
Bobby Got into the Game, and Put a lot of Pressure on Black's Kingside!
I'm a beginner and I love your videos. It has improved my game alot.
Man that's one of the best chess videos I've ever seen - great game and highly instructive commentary, superb !!!
8:18 "...trying to get some action on the queen side."
I chuckled.
Awesome explanation of the game very fun to watch nice work
around the 9 minute mark im sure Fischer wanted to block Nc4 with the pb3 move
I had to stop the video and complement you for such a great play by play announcement. I’ve watched this clip a couple of times before and suddenly realized how you differ from everyone else who’s doing similar videos. You give viewers time to digest the moves and really speak the minds of the players who played the game. I think you’re as good a as it gets. Keep it up and can’t wait for another one of your chess videos.
I just love the way you explain the why´s of each move, it has giving me a complete new insight in a matter of minutes, thank you! Subscribed.
Wow, my first time watching Fischer. It seemed like he was consistently in control the entire game. It seemed like Panno never had a chance
Can you pleaseeeee upload more Bobby Fischer matches? These are all really great.
Mind reading
Since my high school days we back 1973 i already started watching games played by bobby fisher really amazing moves.
i love how you give little tips while the play goes through and also explain what’s behind each move. VERY much appreciate it! thanks again!
Love the videos keep them coming! Always nice to watch comentated matches, helps me learn a lot whilst enjoying it. Keep up the good work Kevin.
Anybody know why Black didn't move pon to F6 at 15:36?
becouse Fischer would just eat it with this pawn that is at e5
No bobby wouldn't do that because the pawn om e5 is important minor pieces
maybe he will move queen to f4
bc pawn on e5 will take and fischer would be up an easy pawn and black would have weakened position tremendously. Bishop on g7 cant take back bc of the pin to the rook
MarcusCism
K’
Maybe because Fischer is attacking his king and the only thing f6 accomplishes is weakening his king position. Hes already getting his dark squared bishop, a fantastic defensive piece, traded off, weaken his king further would not help anything.
That was a great game. Thanks for uploading it.
Thank you for these informative and high-quality videos. You are doing a true service to avid chess players like myself and just wanted to let you know how truly grateful we are for your help. I have watched many of these videos and all have truly been very easy to understand and helped me improve my game.
Thank you for all your videos omg they're so helpful!
Kevin, what software are you using?
Thanks
Ryan
Panno could've saved the game at 18:55 with Queen to G7- no matter what Bobby does he either loses more pieces or captures Panno's Queen with his, then Panno's King recaptures, the bishop of Bobby is forced back, and that saves the game.
It does hold mate off but white wins material. Bishop takes Knight on h7+. If the Queen takes Bishop, then Qxe6+ and wins the other knight and is 3 pawns up with more potential. If Kh8 or Kf8 then QxQ and after KxQ white can retreat the bishop and is 2 pawns up.
Jason - Is this TRUE? It's an OUTRAGE! I want my money back!
Jason Bailey no it doesn't save the game it just prolongs it . He lost the game as was said as soon as he moved his knight to the queen side . When u are a move behind fisher in this situation it's over
Makes you wonder why a strong grandmaster couldnt see a move that wouldnt just equalize but win the game
Very instructive. Thanks a lot Kevin for your excellent choice and commentary. You've got definitely the best chess channel on youtube. carry on the good job.
Great game +great explanation(beginners will become masters with this kind of explanations)
u can be a better player, just by watching this guy's commentaries
Thank you for these videos and sharing your insight.
I really like your videos, you do an amazing job not only explaining what happened but what could have happened. I believe that's what sets you apart from others as that's what many people wonder in chess what could have been done differently.
I've just started playing chess and I am losing the whole time. That's why I am watching this video. As you just said in the end. It is not about the obvious moves, it is about the best moves. I din't think about such things. You have done a great job explaining everything and also showing other options which could have been used! You helped me a lot in understanding chess :)
19:36 some amazing moves in there!!!
Great video would love to see more!
These kind of videos give me great experience and inspiration!
at 15.06 why black didn't play pawn to f6? I am very curious Panno didn't.
Way old comment but I agree
Especially if black was going to just exchange to offload pressure anyways. I feel like pawn to f6 exchanges would've been more favorable and left black more kingside to help defend, and have a semi open file for his rook. Looks like a way better position.
Great end game. Damn
Comment deleted. You are REALLY rude.
Cubby Windows D Fuck off
Taylor Huizenga The black should take the white horse by bishop to utilize it usefully in the game?
Ahmed Baigpppp
Cool video - thanks for the upload!
Kevin, you are the best and "at the same time" I can't wait for another video!
Pleasure watching a legend play and annihilate a player of GM stature I salute the legend Bobby Fisher
Great game! Great commentary, too. Focused on the progress of the game itself, and not every instance of possible alternatives. I appreciate the simplicity, not being a great player myself. Thanks!
Greetings from Croatia!
Man, I've seen so many of your videos, and I just have to comment!
They're videos are just so awesome, you give such a good analysis, and "at the same time" ( :D ), you'r explanations and the voice is very adjusted with the video and the game!
I've learned a LOT from those videos, and expecially from those videos on your website.
Thank you dude, you're the MAN!
Good work, keep on rockin' ;)
Thank you for these informative and high-quality viseos. You are doing a true service to avid chess players like myself and just wanted to let you know how truly grateful we are for your help. I have watched many of these videos and all have truly been very easy to understand and helped me improve my game.
Bobby Fisher... Bobby Fisher.... Bobby Fisher.... BOBBBBYYYY FISSSHHHERRR... yeah :)
But seriously, they guy was a genius... always inspiring.
Bobby Fischer is indeed a great chess player
The greatest f all time
was
@@Cwra1smith His games live on, as does his greatness.
Thank you so much on great videos!
Keep it up!
Good and dynamic commentary, thanks for sharing... good job!
Same Ting
I don't at all intend to sound like a "hater", because I appreciate you posting these videos. I think your analysis could be a little more in depth. We can't simplify the highly calculated, strategic moves of these GMs to "he wants to protect this spot". I get it if you are trying to do that for the "mainstream" non-avid chess fans, and that you can't please everybody, but, personally, I'd like to see a more in depth analysis. Thank you!
+Edward Danielyan Totally agree, simplyfying the motivation behind GM moves might bring more harm than good. One could get a false sense of being able to play like Bobby Fischer just by developing minor pieces and controlling center with nice moves.
Anyway, thank you for sharing the great games.
Yeah, good point !
But then these videos could become 3/4 hour long which would become too boring and a waste of time.
We have game books for that.
Personnaly, I prefer the 14-25 minutes format.
Life's too short !
@RoyalDevil3 I feel the same way. Even with openings that I don't typically play, it's interesting to see how a skilled player like Fischer can be so creative. Seems like all this pieces are always in harmony.
I really appreciate your explanation of each move!
omg Panno played like a patsi. His strategic awareness is disastrous, making terrible tactical blunders everywhere. For the video, I would have liked to see more positional analysis, rather than a pretty shallow commentary on the game.
I would like to see you lose ya virginity. Never gunna happen.
hey bro you can't lose what never mattered heh heh
You explain Fischer's games like a middle school student.
Good one man, you really showed him
If that is an offensive comment then go say that to someone else that's not cool man
+Martin Hyizna You comment like a middle school student
Why don't you show us how to do it then?
Martin Hyizna you make a UA-cam channel and get over 100k subs
Thank You for uploading this video, I really enjoyed watching it :).
Play with me
Thanks for commentaries. Very interesting
Tal, and Kasparov. I don't deny Fishers genius, but in the end he died a raving lunatic, with a hatred towards the USA; a country that both supported him and celebrated him in his early career. And this blind hatred towards the U.S. extended to others as well, which does not speak well of him as a great man.
+David Najor You're right. He should have appreciated the U.S.'s bombing innocent civilians for economic and political reasons more.
+David Najor Perhaps he did but all we are talking about is chess. Not Fischer's personal life, interests and shit. Just chess. And that's where he is the best, there is no one in his right mind who would state otherwise
Pure BS! I said that I didn't deny his genius, but he was not the best that ever was, and he did lose at times to certain others. Just how much do you know about some of the past great champions after all, or are you one of those juvenile people who just fell under the spell of his name alone. So don't try to lecture me about this subject when it comes to certain others of legendary status.
David Najor if you had any sense of morality you would hate America too and you wouldn't be so proud of that American flag. Also, Fischer was better than Tal and Kasparov
He'd be a riot if he was schizo-affective
This guy is far too talkative. I prefer Mato in his version of some of these great chess matches. Far less annoying, and prolonging. It totally takes away from the rhythm of the game.
+David Najor I appreciate his commentary. I feel it helps me bettery understand the game. I can see why someone more familiar with the nuances of the game would prefer less talking, but for those of us lower on the level of understanding having someone discuss a match as two grandmasters play can be very beneficial.
+David Najor Different kind of videos. If you are looking for short ones then mato is great. But this guy and kingscrusher are good for the longer ones.
+Troy Hallewell My thoughts exactly. I've recently got into chess and looking to take in as much commentary as I can to further understand the game, the plays, etc. This prolonged commentary is very beneficial indeed.
What I like most about Bobby Fischer's games is the way he makes his pieces work as a team. Even in a closed position like that, the pieces seemed to help each other in the attack.
holy crap, I'm just randomly going around UA-cam and come across this commentary.
I now love chess...... when there's commentary.
Its like watching starcraft matches with amazing commentary.
If I'm playing, I still suck.
Thanks chesswebsite dude.
Excellent as always Kevin
Briefly pausing at 13:51 to set this up on a real board. Holy shit when you look at Fischers "hammering down the furniture" approach to the opening. Absolutely inescapable strength.
great video, enjoyed watching it
Amazing! Thanks for uploading!
love the videos man. do you have any games that you have played that you could post?
Thank you so much kevin! I learned alot watching this!
Love your videos brother
Very cool. Thanks for the analysis. Was made aware of this game on Chess.com.
Brilliant attacking chess play by Fischer. Very effective use of his g and h pawns.
WOW thats great, thanks for explaining and analyzing the moves Kevin.
I've learnt ALOT from your videos, thanks !
Brilliant commentary! Get you hooked
Very fine game with excellent commentary. Very helpful. My thanks.
Hey Kevin, thnx for all these amazing vids and lessons that you share. Your commentary is superb and I've learnt a lot from ur in-between analyses. Can you please share some nice games where opponents castle on opposite sides? Fischer's, if possible coz he's so creative. I find it really hard to write defining moves when my opponent goes and castles on the wrong side and I was planning to attack the other side.
Thanks for this game. This opening looks very similar to one that I use from time to time although not with the same results as Mr. Fischer.
Thanks for posting.
@paddyraas that's pretty impressive, esp if you include Be4! in the mix.
Thanks for all the videos! Much appreciated. Even as a chessnoob.
Am loving these videos. I'm just wondering what sort of process you would recommend for a beginner to advance.
16:35 Which exactly allows him to take G5 if Fischer pushes the knight
thx for sharing this video i really enjoyed it
9 years later and I'm watching this.
Outstanding play and also commentry
Bro.. wow superb explanation.. thanks a lot
Great game from Bobby. Thanks
These type of games where the attack goes down to the last couple of pieces are very entertaining.
Would you be able to expand more on what he's doing so much, "At the same time"
Very good presentation of the game.
I learned a lot wow. Great video.
Well played!
Thanks for sharing!
at 15:20 (Qg5) why cant/doesnt black respond with pawn to f6?
Then white pawn takes f6
Unbelievable game. Thanks
This was a really fun and exciting game to watch.
saw the f6 bishop, I'm basically pro now
Wonderful !!!
I am so proud about the fact that I saw almost every move you said was brilliant😊😆
This hurt my brain and I'm not even playing. I can see why he went crazy.
excellent explainer Kevin
Nice game by Fischer. Thanks for posting, Buddy.
very insightful recap. cheers from argentina!
@Boorsu agreed.