Triple Expansion Steam Engine Animation

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 46

  • @carlbolling9404
    @carlbolling9404 4 роки тому +11

    Great video. Exactly what I wanted. Just an explanation. No music, no wasted history time, just how it worked. Thanks!

  • @fenderblues100
    @fenderblues100 3 роки тому +1

    Great animation. What a super design of engine. You really simplified the operations her.

  • @iannorris1941
    @iannorris1941 5 років тому +1

    the explanation is very clear and easy to understand.

  • @saxit5702
    @saxit5702 2 роки тому +1

    Very clear animation, thanks for your working!

  • @mikkykyluc5804
    @mikkykyluc5804 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you, always wondered how these worked. Well done!

  • @davidwillis5016
    @davidwillis5016 11 місяців тому +1

    Great video and very informative, now I'm gonna go build one and hope I don't blow myself up! Just kinding, I will be careful of course and take precautions

  • @82christos
    @82christos 6 років тому +3

    Beautiful animation! Thanks!

  • @kb3cxe
    @kb3cxe 10 років тому +4

    Very nice, and concise explanation.

  • @MsJinkerson
    @MsJinkerson 5 років тому

    Thanks for this in-depth animation I finally understand

  • @douglasjohnson8820
    @douglasjohnson8820 8 років тому

    Great explanation and graphics. Best shots of this beast was in the movie, "Sand Pebbles." 'LIVE STEM STOP YOULE".

  • @HighlanderNorth1
    @HighlanderNorth1 8 років тому

    Very clear and concise explanation. I guess you could almost consider this a 6 cylinder, since the piston in each cylinder is powered when it travels back AND forth.

    • @stevend4544
      @stevend4544 5 років тому +1

      That's called double action

  • @chrisw9062
    @chrisw9062 11 років тому +1

    @ cresta141, i believe i know the answer to ur question, as superheated steam cools down, which is steam heated to the point where iit is actually somewat dry, it expands ALOT, the steam expanding is wat actually forces the piston to move n not the actual steam pressure, N as it expands it cools more n becomes bigger n bigger in volume, thats why the cylinders become bigger , i hope this answered ur question :)

  • @floriantartz2448
    @floriantartz2448 2 роки тому

    Very nice video, explains it perfectly 👍

  • @CyberSlayerNo1
    @CyberSlayerNo1 12 років тому +7

    Thanks for the awesome explanation! This was very informative ;)

  • @organbuilder272
    @organbuilder272 6 років тому

    Simplistic but effective. Generally the HP cylinder was in the middle with the other two flanking either side. but the principal is exactly the same. Unless they use the Corliss system.

  • @junkyardjim
    @junkyardjim 6 років тому +1

    thanks for the explain, i live on a shipping channel and am familiar with these engines from old ships.

  • @fredobermann6766
    @fredobermann6766 6 років тому

    Very nice animation, thanks!

  • @ThePokemonSoldier
    @ThePokemonSoldier 5 років тому

    May use this to help build functional mini replica of Titanic's steam engines using a Pop-pop steam engine as the boiler system.

  • @MegaPeedee
    @MegaPeedee 4 роки тому

    Thank you. I learned something new.

  • @kierondesmond7791
    @kierondesmond7791 4 роки тому +1

    I think the steam comes into the middle of the control valve and exits via the ends. The opposite of the way shown here. =D

  • @xXNebulaNinjaXx
    @xXNebulaNinjaXx 9 років тому

    This was awesome!

  • @BCLSundayFunday
    @BCLSundayFunday 11 років тому +1

    I dig the video. It seems that any power produced in the 2nd and 3rd cylinders would create equivalent back pressure on the first cylinder. I almost want to say it would negate any added efficiency but I haven't totally comprehended how the different bores play a role. I believe I'm asking a question.

    • @acynder1
      @acynder1 5 років тому

      I understand this like this:
      Parting whit the knolenge that the energy from steam is the presure at wich it is, the engine's duty is transform it (the presure)in to motion.
      In the first stage, the presure is a X value and it does a N amount of work depending on the userful volume that the piston has. After the 1st stage, the steam has losed a amount of presure because the expansion of the piston, lets say that it has losed half of its original presure, now it has 0,5X of presure. In the second piston, we want the steam to do the same amount of work, but since the steam has half the presure, we need a piston with twice the surface area, now the steam does its thing and the same deal happens at the 3th stage with steam at 0,25X of presure. This is how I understand it

  • @blastking2006
    @blastking2006 9 років тому +1

    What type of oil do you need to lubricate this

    • @cruzebear70
      @cruzebear70 7 років тому

      Steam oil I actually think they call it.

  • @cresta141
    @cresta141 11 років тому

    Great! I understood the concept, very well explained, however I have a question. I do understand that the steam passing over one cylinder cools down a little. Do a cooler steam have an increase in volume? that, in this case the same amount of steam from a smaller cylinder is used in a larger one and so on?? Thank you!

  • @Ihsan_almohsin
    @Ihsan_almohsin 7 років тому +1

    very useful thanks a lot

  • @GauravPawar-vl7jb
    @GauravPawar-vl7jb 6 місяців тому

    Why not power all cylinder directly from boiler

  • @mr.dahliaking.202
    @mr.dahliaking.202 10 років тому

    OK, so if I understood the Titanic had triple expansion engine, and 33 boilers, right? so what is the highest speed they can produce? I mean in miles/hour?

    • @vet6822
      @vet6822 8 років тому

      titanic could make about 21/22 knots. about 25mph.

    • @MaTTdeluca14
      @MaTTdeluca14 8 років тому

      Titanic actually had 2 triple expansion four-cylinder engines and 1 low-pressure Parson reaction turbine engine for the center propeller. All three were powered by 29 Scotch boilers at 215 psig of steam pressure. Making over 53,000 shaft-horsepower combined, they could propel the Titanic up to 23 knots or about 25mph as vet68 stated correctly. If only Titanic's navigation technology matched it's propulsion technology. Who knows what could've been.

  • @iPlayForTrickshot
    @iPlayForTrickshot 8 років тому

    Great vidéo ! Bises, Michel.

  • @paulie1982
    @paulie1982  12 років тому +3

    No probs, glad you liked it. Obviously the Titanics engines were way cooler than these :).

    • @MissionTapasya
      @MissionTapasya 4 роки тому

      I have a doubt,if some one can answer it woul be great,it may sound silly
      Q1.In a steam engine,is the forward stroke speed equal to reverse stroke speed,i know they are not very different,but still if there is a difference of seconds or micro seconds
      Q2.if the forward stroke pressure(or force)is similar to reverse stroke pressure(or force)
      Plz answer my two question,i am a student
      Thanks in advance

    • @luketa84
      @luketa84 3 роки тому

      Eu so nao entendi porque eu não entendo inglês -_-

  • @chrisw9062
    @chrisw9062 11 років тому

    Very awesome, i wish i knew how to use autocad, it would save me alot of money on paper n pencils and alot of time , since i didnt hAve to explain every part of the design to people lol, i swear if i ever won the lottery ud see me playing with all sorts of steam "toys" on lake michigan lol

  • @DavidG2P
    @DavidG2P 5 років тому

    Great animation. Unfortunately, the video quality is terrible as soon as something starts to move. Obviously you used a way too low Mbits per second setting when creating the compressed video

  • @mohammadreyaz3743
    @mohammadreyaz3743 4 роки тому

    Thanks you

  • @Khwartz
    @Khwartz 10 років тому

    So Very Thanks Again For Sharing So Clear Explanations :)
    Please, could you compare this triple effect to fans turbines and Tesla turbine in terms of efficency and density power? Please.
    Regards.

  • @carlos-bt4dt
    @carlos-bt4dt 6 років тому

    great to see how a trippel steam Engine works. I gues Titanic hade this type of Engine,

    • @Dilophi
      @Dilophi 5 років тому

      Yes, it was a triple expansion, but it had 4 cylinders. Low pressure was divided in 2 Cylinders.
      ua-cam.com/video/d9OlD60Hp04/v-deo.html

  • @genetikmuhendis5877
    @genetikmuhendis5877 7 років тому +1

    Like turbochargers does in this years..

  • @GauravPawar-vl7jb
    @GauravPawar-vl7jb 6 місяців тому

    Rms royal mail service