This is only one of the videos I viewed before subscribing. Viewing it again, along with others previously viewed, I'm convinced without a doubt I MADE the right decision. Guaranteed to be a loyal subscriber. Thank you, NST. BLESSINGS to you, your family and your other loyal subscribers. ❤🇺🇸🚑
The woman who was arrested pretty much nailed the coffin shut when she said she had to catch up to the other car to show them her gun. And nobody knows if she was a felon or not, not even the prosecutor. Go figure.
The prosecutor didn't have the woman's criminal record pulled up. She wasn't even told the woman's name to pull it up. Critical thinking skills are a must here.
I’m going to go against the norm here and say there were two sides to the story here and just because she had a weapon doesn’t mean she pointed it at the subjects. If you notice the RP changed their story at the end from what they initially stated in the beginning and they failed to state they were the ones that initiated the road rage incident. If Tpr. Hess, the ADA and the Deputy couldn’t initially decide I bet a good Defence attorney will probably have a hay day with this. Would like to hear if there is a follow up to this. Very interesting. I agree with the brandishing of the weapon but there are so many weird things about this stop. Thanks for posting another great video
@cyndym1 followup would be great, NST will hopefully read responses. Absolutely riveting video. Usually I'll google names of the involved, but what the heck in this case
That was a great one. To be able to see all the go thru for a stop like that. Lots of work and time went into that to make sure they were doing the proper thing. It went a long way that she was calm. If she was an idiot there would have been no hesitation before he took her into custody. Great job ASP. One of these days I’m going to get out that way.
Charges must've been dismissed because I just looked up her criminal info on the Arkansas court search. Nothing came up about her past felonies or this arrest.
I am confused about this entire situation. She was never charged with a felony but it was as a juvenile. That’s not her name but it’s her sister. But it was for check forgery. The fact that she caught up to the other woman to show her the gun she instigated it and took it to another level. She admitted to showing the gun. If she was run off the road after the first time she should have called the police. You can’t just go around waving guns at people.
Why was the fact of the woman running the other one off the road never brought up in the end. She wanted charges pressed for being ran off the road and was disregarded
I’ve always been told to never produce a firearm unless you intend to use it. I understand that road rage is very real but at the same time, flipping the bird is much less likely to get you charged with aggravated assault.
First off a responsible Gun owner never reveals or draws there weapon with out absolute cause! She an antagonist to catch up to the other person! So error on the Gun owner! As for the other fool she’s just a hateful person that needs to get over herself! Using a car as a weapon is indeed an issue! Best is what the trooper is doing consulting officials! Both ladies are in the wrong here! I am not buying Driver#2 story! Her claim to “seeing” a gun is even bs even though it was in a holster! Hey wasn’t she arrested for the charges Driver #1 made? Both need to have charges! To be fair! Invest in a Dash Cam! Both of you!
I was liking the video till everything started going one sided. He took one side of the story and ran with it. The lady that was arrested also wanted press charges and nothing happened to her. If you arrest one you should take both because it's a she said she said deal.
how could they prove that she tried to run her off the road? because she said so? the only thing they could prove was that she pointed the gun at her she even admitted it. the other party knew the color of the gun and even the color of the holster the charges were correct.
If I heard correctly, the gun was actually “silver”, which would indicate either a stainless or nickel finish. It did however have a black grip. Sounds to me like the woman never upholstered her gun, but regardless, once she told the cops she had to “catch up to her”, after apparently (according to her at least) having been run off the road four times didn’t fly. Kind of hard to convince that you feared for your life when you have to “catch up to someone”.
@Qasim Jabbar she didn't claim to have pointed the gun her direction. If the gun was pointed at the "victim" how in the hell would she be able to determine the color?
She still could be once the investigation has concluded. This is a misunderstanding many make. Just because an arrest wasn't made the day of the incident doesnt mean that warrants won't be issued after the investigation has concluded. 🐾🐾
had this in DC rush hour way back when. Guy calls & says a guy in a car stopped, went to the trunk & obtained a gun & pointed at him & the driver. Vehicle located & stopped in idling traffic, surprise, no gun located, guy was wanted though. Called "victim" and told them to come id the suspect. Tried to get out of it, told your're obligated now. Arrived and arrested for false police report.
It seems to me the only way you could see the color of the gun and the holster would be sideways, as if you are pointing it at the windshield. Straight on pointing would be hard to tell both colors.
I don't agree with the outcome, but I have been in many road rage incidents, nothing too serious, but I've learned to avoid routes that have stupidly bad road designs, stupid people and bad situations. When someone does get pissy, I shake it off or move on. Basically I am done with idiots.
😂😂😂 I have never heard of someone claiming that they feared for their lives from a gun in a holster ??? If that were the case anyone with a CCW could get called at for carrying one around, as the person feared for their life from that person ??? IDK… it boggles the mind how they think you can shoot a holstered weapon !!!
The officer was very professional, fair, and concerned about doing his job accurately and to his best ability. The prosecutor: predictable! You have enough, just arrest her and we can get the bail money. It's always about money with the judicial part of things.
Training for gun License , we were told never to pull gun out unless you are going to use it. some people loss their gun for pulling up shirts. Brandish is the name.
The racial slurs or name calling CAN NOT be proven!!! On the other hand, the driver with the gun had the weapon on her person!!! She is to be charged with aggravated assault appropriately!!!
The biggest problem is gang initiations, where I live, they will road rage on purpose, or tap your bumper, then when you pull over, you get shot. Most are girl gangs as crazy as that is.. Its a way to get initiated...
Dash cam would show their car pushed her in the ditch 4 times. Showing a gun in a holster . Call a lawyer for that response 🤔🛻💢💥🚙🔫👀😤😠 road rage never fixes the problem 🤔🙏💯
This maybe unpopular but in my opinion the other party should’ve been charged with reckless driving! Yes actions having consequences and the suspect was wrong and should be charged accordingly however I don’t feel the other party’s actions where correct either and she should be held accountable as well! If that was in fact true she could’ve killed the suspect by causing her to run off the road!😳💙💛🇺🇸⭐️ Thanks for the amazing episode buddy! Keep conquering as always!⭐️💙🎉👍
The lady that got arrested said she wanted to press charges on the other lady and that she wanted her to be arrested to which in my opinion the other lady should have been arrested to for reckless driving but if u noticed the cops didn’t do that part. It’s sad to arrest a 56 year old woman for saying she was in fear of her life but if speed limit is 75 of course she is gonna catch up to them but the other lady should have been arrested for reckless driving
That one's a headscratcher for sure. Tough, and lot of shesaid/shesaid, as it were. As the saying goes, there's always three sides to every story, one side, the other side, and what REALLY happened. It's an investigator's job to get to the third side, as best as possible. Mistakes were made by both parties for sure, even if Ms. Glass isn't guilty of that which she is accused. Be nice if there were further witnesses, camera footage, anything to add context and help to illuminate what really occurred. Initially I didn't think either party was being completely honest, although now I'm thinking that Ms. Glass sounded like she really was possibly being completely frank. I think the "victim" was still holding quite a lot back, and pretending that she wasn't the aggressor for at least some of it. I do have one nitpick, by the way. Despite Tpr. Hess doing a truly outstanding job with this crazy mess, he made a bit of error in stating that the nature of the interview was non-custodial, even though I understand what he meant. I don't believe that Ms. Glass was free to go at that time, or that Ms. Glass would have believed that she was. Rightly, she would have been considered to be under investigatory detention, given the circumstances, thus it could be argued that the interview was indeed custodial in nature. In fact, it might have been best to mirandize her early on, to ensure any statements made would be fully admissible in court without a defense attorney getting them chucked. Personally, I probably would have done so as soon as she admitted that firearm had been displayed, just to be on the safe side. I'd really like to know how this one pans out in the end, and what the disposition ends up being. It's gonna be as much of a mess for the court, as it was for Tpr. Hess. Any good defense attorney will have a field day with this, and the prosecutor is going to have their hands full.
Definitely a strange situation. That whole story reminded me of a time a guy was arrested for DUI locally and he had my same first and last name. It was entered in the system under me and not him, so I ended up having taxes withheld and had to go to court to fix it. Then I was pulled over for speeding once and the cop called backup. I was told to get out while they looked for tattoos. I don’t have any. I haven’t had any issues since, and even have my nursing license and gun purchases. But it was an ordeal that could have been ugly.
@@Fcreceptor oh goodness that awful that the two of you were blended in the system. I sure hope that you were able to fix those issues and it doesn't happen again. From one nurse to another have a blessed day!
Exactly - she fessed up to displaying the holster.....the only people who do that want to threaten the other party (gun or no gun). Now if there wasn't a gun found then that could mitigate the issue.
The biggest problem is gang initiations, where I live, they will road rage on purpose, or tap your bumper, then when you pull over, you get shot. Most are girl gangs as crazy as that is.. Its a way to get initiated...
The cop keeps saying that she never told him anything after she got arrested. The thing is she didn’t have the time of day to tell him till after they left usually if you get arrested you get ask is there anything in your car if you want to bring with you? My opinion cop needs to be fired
This trooper did jump in a lot of conclusions. He should investigate it further from the accusing party and why did he not inventory the car which is proper procedure when you arrest the driver who has the gun what’s going to happen to her purse so he was just wanting to put the cuffs on her, and take her to jail
I say, when the accusing party finds out she hast to go to court she’ll not show up or drop the charges and when the prosecutor looks at this, I’ll say they’ll drop the charges to because you can talk big and bad on the side of the road, but when it comes to court date, most people will not show up cases drop
if they were playing hot shot in the car thats hard to prove the only thing we do know is that she pointed the gun at her since she knew the color of the gun and the holster so she needed to be arrested.
Did she think about the gun going off and killing an innocent driver??? I also wonder if the role was reversed would this officer taken so much time to call the DA and ask what to do about this road rage incident. Just a thought...
maybe she forged the checks at 17 and went to court at 18? maybe call the prosecutor every single time you pull someone over? long long video no PIT maneuvers , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
![[UA] NAVI vs MOUZ | BO5 | IEM Rio 2024](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/CMBYk0cbGoA/mqdefault.jpg)
I've never seen an officer in my 51 years of life follow the law the way he did. Kudos brother, GREAT JOB!!🐾🐾👊
This officer went above and beyond to make sure he did the right thing. I love this officer !!!
Exactly. Very thorough and wanted to make sure of the most appropriate way to handle the situation.
This is only one of the videos I viewed before subscribing. Viewing it again, along with others previously viewed, I'm convinced without a doubt I MADE the right decision. Guaranteed to be a loyal subscriber. Thank you, NST. BLESSINGS to you, your family and your other loyal subscribers. ❤🇺🇸🚑
The woman who was arrested pretty much nailed the coffin shut when she said she had to catch up to the other car to show them her gun. And nobody knows if she was a felon or not, not even the prosecutor. Go figure.
The prosecutor didn't have the woman's criminal record pulled up. She wasn't even told the woman's name to pull it up. Critical thinking skills are a must here.
Hey buddy here as always thanks for the upload!💙⭐️🇺🇸🎉👍 your work with the series is appreciated!💙⭐️❤️
I’m going to go against the norm here and say there were two sides to the story here and just because she had a weapon doesn’t mean she pointed it at the subjects. If you notice the RP changed their story at the end from what they initially stated in the beginning and they failed to state they were the ones that initiated the road rage incident. If Tpr. Hess, the ADA and the Deputy couldn’t initially decide I bet a good Defence attorney will probably have a hay day with this. Would like to hear if there is a follow up to this. Very interesting. I agree with the brandishing of the weapon but there are so many weird things about this stop. Thanks for posting another great video
So many variables. If she can prove AK gun purchases, she'd have a much better case.
@cyndym1 followup would be great, NST will hopefully read responses. Absolutely riveting video. Usually I'll google names of the involved, but what the heck in this case
@@Solteratube What does Alaska gun purchases have to do with this?
@@Solteratube AR is Arkansas. AK is Alaska.
100%
This is why I’m getting a dash cam
That was a great one. To be able to see all the go thru for a stop like that. Lots of work and time went into that to make sure they were doing the proper thing. It went a long way that she was calm. If she was an idiot there would have been no hesitation before he took her into custody. Great job ASP. One of these days I’m going to get out that way.
Charges must've been dismissed because I just looked up her criminal info on the Arkansas court search. Nothing came up about her past felonies or this arrest.
I'm confused. Why did he not arrest the other lady for Road Rage? I thought Road Rage was a crime.
exactly., it takes two, guaranteed both people acted badly.
I am confused about this entire situation. She was never charged with a felony but it was as a juvenile. That’s not her name but it’s her sister.
But it was for check forgery.
The fact that she caught up to the other woman to show her the gun she instigated it and took it to another level.
She admitted to showing the gun. If she was run off the road after the first time she should have called the police.
You can’t just go around waving guns at people.
Why was the fact of the woman running the other one off the road never brought up in the end. She wanted charges pressed for being ran off the road and was disregarded
I’ve always been told to never produce a firearm unless you intend to use it. I understand that road rage is very real but at the same time, flipping the bird is much less likely to get you charged with aggravated assault.
Thanks for another great video and chat NST 💙
That was a tough to figure out good job officer keeping a level head and remained open til everyone one gave you their advice stay safe out there
First off a responsible Gun owner never reveals or draws there weapon with out absolute cause! She an antagonist to catch up to the other person! So error on the Gun owner! As for the other fool she’s just a hateful person that needs to get over herself! Using a car as a weapon is indeed an issue!
Best is what the trooper is doing consulting officials! Both ladies are in the wrong here!
I am not buying Driver#2 story! Her claim to “seeing” a gun is even bs even though it was in a holster!
Hey wasn’t she arrested for the charges Driver #1 made?
Both need to have charges! To be fair!
Invest in a Dash Cam! Both of you!
Should be more of this type. This is very educational and helpful.
I was liking the video till everything started going one sided. He took one side of the story and ran with it. The lady that was arrested also wanted press charges and nothing happened to her. If you arrest one you should take both because it's a she said she said deal.
How come no one mentions that the gun was NEVER unholstered???
What happened to pressing charges against the other party for running her off the road? It seemed like once they arrested this female they were done.
how could they prove that she tried to run her off the road? because she said so? the only thing they could prove was that she pointed the gun at her she even admitted it. the other party knew the color of the gun and even the color of the holster the charges were correct.
If I heard correctly, the gun was actually “silver”, which would indicate either a stainless or nickel finish. It did however have a black grip. Sounds to me like the woman never upholstered her gun, but regardless, once she told the cops she had to “catch up to her”, after apparently (according to her at least) having been run off the road four times didn’t fly. Kind of hard to convince that you feared for your life when you have to “catch up to someone”.
@Qasim Jabbar she didn't claim to have pointed the gun her direction. If the gun was pointed at the "victim" how in the hell would she be able to determine the color?
What about the other driver running her off the road 4 times shouldn't she be charged with something?
No unbiased witnesses, and the woman didn’t “admit” to running her off the road, whereas the other woman did admit to brandishing a firearm.
Right????? I would have dug into that. Guaranteed we would have seen a belligerent woman raisin hell
She still could be once the investigation has concluded. This is a misunderstanding many make. Just because an arrest wasn't made the day of the incident doesnt mean that warrants won't be issued after the investigation has concluded. 🐾🐾
she was not underage in 1985 if she was born in 1966
You tellin me you're not supposed to brandish a firearm at people who cut you off? :D
had this in DC rush hour way back when. Guy calls & says a guy in a car stopped, went to the trunk & obtained a gun & pointed at him & the driver. Vehicle located & stopped in idling traffic, surprise, no gun located, guy was wanted though. Called "victim" and told them to come id the suspect. Tried to get out of it, told your're obligated now. Arrived and arrested for false police report.
It seems to me the only way you could see the color of the gun and the holster would be sideways, as if you are pointing it at the windshield. Straight on pointing would be hard to tell both colors.
I don't agree with the outcome, but I have been in many road rage incidents, nothing too serious, but I've learned to avoid routes that have stupidly bad road designs, stupid people and bad situations. When someone does get pissy, I shake it off or move on. Basically I am done with idiots.
😂😂😂 I have never heard of someone claiming that they feared for their lives from a gun in a holster ??? If that were the case anyone with a CCW could get called at for carrying one around, as the person feared for their life from that person ??? IDK… it boggles the mind how they think you can shoot a holstered weapon !!!
This was quite educational..
God bless good cops. Doing their best to uphold the law. Can’t ask for more.
I really thought this cop was about to start crying 😅 Calm down bud, it’s not the end of the world 🤣🤣
I agree if one is to be arrested then the other woman needs to be charge for running her off the road several times. Come on man!!
that cannot be proven the only thing they can prove is that she pointed the gun at the other party.
You have to call it in before you are called on in some states
If that was true the other lady should of called the police after the 1st time not 4 times later speeding up with a gun 😂😂
The officer was very professional, fair, and concerned about doing his job accurately and to his best ability. The prosecutor: predictable! You have enough, just arrest her and we can get the bail money. It's always about money with the judicial part of things.
Training for gun License , we were told never to pull gun out unless you are going to use it. some people loss their gun for pulling up shirts. Brandish is the name.
What does forgery have anything to do with being run off the road?
Wow! What a dilemma.
I personally, think the officers need to send tickets out to the people that doesn’t move over.
The racial slurs or name calling CAN NOT be proven!!! On the other hand, the driver with the gun had the weapon on her person!!! She is to be charged with aggravated assault appropriately!!!
Agreed!
The biggest problem is gang initiations, where I live, they will road rage on purpose, or tap your bumper, then when you pull over, you get shot. Most are girl gangs as crazy as that is.. Its a way to get initiated...
Dash cam would show their car pushed her in the ditch 4 times. Showing a gun in a holster . Call a lawyer for that response 🤔🛻💢💥🚙🔫👀😤😠 road rage never fixes the problem 🤔🙏💯
This maybe unpopular but in my opinion the other party should’ve been charged with reckless driving! Yes actions having consequences and the suspect was wrong and should be charged accordingly however I don’t feel the other party’s actions where correct either and she should be held accountable as well! If that was in fact true she could’ve killed the suspect by causing her to run off the road!😳💙💛🇺🇸⭐️ Thanks for the amazing episode buddy! Keep conquering as always!⭐️💙🎉👍
He sure did a lot of searching. Imagine if everyone was treated this way 🤔
Stupid is stupid does never flash your firearm to anyone poor judgement and bad behavior that's why most States offer gun safety classes get educated
🎯
Damage?
The lady that got arrested said she wanted to press charges on the other lady and that she wanted her to be arrested to which in my opinion the other lady should have been arrested to for reckless driving but if u noticed the cops didn’t do that part. It’s sad to arrest a 56 year old woman for saying she was in fear of her life but if speed limit is 75 of course she is gonna catch up to them but the other lady should have been arrested for reckless driving
My question is , how’d the rp attempt to run her off the road 4 times if it happened as fast as the rp says ??? I’m confused about that part ???
Book’r Dano.
Woooooooo #flashbacks 😉👍
It could’ve all been avoided if they would have all acted like grown ups.
Sorry , there's too much background traffic noise to clearly hear conversation.
Let’s goooo!!🎉
💙
Trooper Hess... I think you should've just cited her and let her go. I'll leave it at that because anything else is going to come off as racist.
I don't believe any of that nonsense about being ran off the road four times. She was just mad that she couldn't pass.
Getting to some older ones 😊
That one's a headscratcher for sure. Tough, and lot of shesaid/shesaid, as it were. As the saying goes, there's always three sides to every story, one side, the other side, and what REALLY happened. It's an investigator's job to get to the third side, as best as possible. Mistakes were made by both parties for sure, even if Ms. Glass isn't guilty of that which she is accused. Be nice if there were further witnesses, camera footage, anything to add context and help to illuminate what really occurred. Initially I didn't think either party was being completely honest, although now I'm thinking that Ms. Glass sounded like she really was possibly being completely frank. I think the "victim" was still holding quite a lot back, and pretending that she wasn't the aggressor for at least some of it.
I do have one nitpick, by the way. Despite Tpr. Hess doing a truly outstanding job with this crazy mess, he made a bit of error in stating that the nature of the interview was non-custodial, even though I understand what he meant. I don't believe that Ms. Glass was free to go at that time, or that Ms. Glass would have believed that she was. Rightly, she would have been considered to be under investigatory detention, given the circumstances, thus it could be argued that the interview was indeed custodial in nature. In fact, it might have been best to mirandize her early on, to ensure any statements made would be fully admissible in court without a defense attorney getting them chucked. Personally, I probably would have done so as soon as she admitted that firearm had been displayed, just to be on the safe side.
I'd really like to know how this one pans out in the end, and what the disposition ends up being. It's gonna be as much of a mess for the court, as it was for Tpr. Hess. Any good defense attorney will have a field day with this, and the prosecutor is going to have their hands full.
Some ex-felons have legally regained their 2nd ammendment rights. I wonder how that shows up in the system?
Definitely a strange situation. That whole story reminded me of a time a guy was arrested for DUI locally and he had my same first and last name. It was entered in the system under me and not him, so I ended up having taxes withheld and had to go to court to fix it. Then I was pulled over for speeding once and the cop called backup. I was told to get out while they looked for tattoos. I don’t have any. I haven’t had any issues since, and even have my nursing license and gun purchases. But it was an ordeal that could have been ugly.
@@Fcreceptor oh goodness that awful that the two of you were blended in the system. I sure hope that you were able to fix those issues and it doesn't happen again. From one nurse to another have a blessed day!
Displaying a gun is displaying a gun. Childish and criminal. Glad she was arrested.
Exactly - she fessed up to displaying the holster.....the only people who do that want to threaten the other party (gun or no gun). Now if there wasn't a gun found then that could mitigate the issue.
🔫🙄
The biggest problem is gang initiations, where I live, they will road rage on purpose, or tap your bumper, then when you pull over, you get shot. Most are girl gangs as crazy as that is.. Its a way to get initiated...
There are two sides to every story. He chose not to question the other party. Suspect.
yeah sounds like they both should be charged with assault 1
He had to make sure he was doing his job
Question… What is your opening music? Thank you
[Arkansas Native]
Jase. “Just a Bad Dream”.
soundcloud.com/side-project-mixtape/just-a-bad-dream
@@NaturalStateTransparency Thank you
The cop keeps saying that she never told him anything after she got arrested. The thing is she didn’t have the time of day to tell him till after they left usually if you get arrested you get ask is there anything in your car if you want to bring with you? My opinion cop needs to be fired
"teenager" is not a legal term. There is only Adult or Minor. Another case of 'spelling' 🧚♀
This trooper did jump in a lot of conclusions. He should investigate it further from the accusing party and why did he not inventory the car which is proper procedure when you arrest the driver who has the gun what’s going to happen to her purse so he was just wanting to put the cuffs on her, and take her to jail
I say, when the accusing party finds out she hast to go to court she’ll not show up or drop the charges and when the prosecutor looks at this, I’ll say they’ll drop the charges to because you can talk big and bad on the side of the road, but when it comes to court date, most people will not show up cases drop
if they were playing hot shot in the car thats hard to prove the only thing we do know is that she pointed the gun at her since she knew the color of the gun and the holster so she needed to be arrested.
If she truly pointed the gun in her direction, how could the victim determine the color??
Why is the back seat so cluttered? Shameful!
I'm not all the way through the video yet, but the way she is chugging on that cig, I'm thinking she's the one, and she knows it!
Did she think about the gun going off and killing an innocent driver???
I also wonder if the role was reversed would this officer taken so much time to call the DA and ask what to do about this road rage incident. Just a thought...
I’m sorry she displayed a gun. Otherwise, a call to cops would have been best. I’m on her side, but a gun is for killing only.
maybe she forged the checks at 17 and went to court at 18? maybe call the prosecutor every single time you pull someone over? long long video no PIT maneuvers , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
OBJECTION!!!