Very different approach to presenting this suite of plugins and much of what you say really makes sense. I've been using the Nik Collection since the 90s and had started to grow tired of DxO's very incremental updates over the past couple years. But this one is significant. Adding powerful luminosity masking and the enhanced local editing in this update make spending the money worthwhile. Thanks for taking the time to put this well considered review together!
@@hawkeyeone1328 Same for me. I bought the Collection 7 yesterday during Black Friday - Not a huge sale but wanted to upgrade from 2 to 7. I was going to buy it at version 5 but when didn't want to honor my DXO Collection 2.
Thanks for the review. I had the NIK collection since 2014, used it a bit for black and white. Through a few computer upgrades I do not have it any more. I'm looking again into it because I like the outcome of Nik editing tools. So I'm looking to buy it to edit easy the photos to what I like. Your review is convincing.
Another good take, Andy! I've been a long-time Nik user and am happy to see it continue, especially with the deeper integration into the overall DxO suite which I'm adopting more and more over PS / Lightroom. I like the ability to see (and learn?) what's being done to achieve a certain look rather than just letting AI "do it's thing" in a black-box. I guess I'm "old-skool", which is fine by me. :)
I am still on version 4, I think. I tried the 6 but didn't feel that it added anything special for the price. This one is different. I have only had an hour or so of play with it, but it seems that they have added some worthwhile features and improvements. The ability to migrate directly from one plugin to another is great. Might go for this version.
DXO been my go to for YEARS - especially SilverEfex for my infrared photos. Was going through a photo mojo failure when they changed the interface a couple of versions ago, which contributed to 2 years of barely any processing or uploading, but now it's all coming back and actually don't mind the AI changes now. Now need to figure out how it fits into a non-Adobe workflow (once I figure out what I want to use)
I rediscovered NIK very recently and had the same overall response as you did. Color Efex was surprisingly useful, and the luminosity masking plugged the hole in PL6 that would have otherwise required PL7 **AND** FP7 (SMH) so that alone was worth the upgrade. Additionally, just as you related, I was impressed with Dfine, using it on a particularly challenging unplanned closeup portrait taken at high ISO and with an adapted old Nikkor lens. It removed the 'bad' noise while still leaving the good 'grain' of the image. So - at least for me, still very much relevant.
I just found this video and very much enjoyed it - very good, thank you. I recently upgraded to Nik 7 from Nik 4 and it is a big step forward for me. I also have found that Colour efex, Silver efex and Output Sharpening are the tools that I use most frequently. The improved masking ability is also extremely powerful and useful. I switched from Lightroom to Photolab a couple of years ago and am glad that I did. I agree that the AI capabilities of Lightroom are easier to use, but prefer the DxO Photolab approach to masking and sharpening - much more control which is always a good thing!
Great review, thank you. I have been a Silver Efex user for many years - the only part of NIK Collection I ever use, and I recently stumped up for v7, there is a good discount for existing users. The workflow within the plug-in is a bit odd, I agree, but you soon get used to it, and many of the presets provide really good starting points.
Great video as always and I must be one of the few that love the latest iteration of the Nik Collection. I find it to be the perfect companion to DxO PhotoLab7 and with this latest upgrade, I am finding that I now only rarely pop over to Photoshop. This is mainly for object removal and general clean-up rather than any serious editing. I do wish that DxO PhotoLab would improve in this area. I do hope that DxO make the polygonal selection tool and the ability to create oval Control Points to the next upgrade of PhotoLab. Incidentally, I am, against the general coconscious, loving the Viewpoint technology. I find it gives me all the control I require. I was an an avid Capture One fan but for me DxO has the right ethos and tools to take me forward in my post-production journey.
Yea, I definitely believe DxO are onto something with their more nuanced approached to AI, but there are improvements they need to make that would make their software more popular. I reckon the improved mask functionality is a near-certainty for Photolab 8.
Another longtime NIK user here. I’m still stuck on v4, and it grates on me that there’s a very small discount available for me on an upgrade. I’m not yet convinced that I’d get my money’s worth if I jumped to v7. I most often use Color Efex and Silver Effects with occasional jumps into Analog. Yes, it would be nice to have improved selection tools, but I wonder if that’s worth the price of admission.
Another oldster here - been using NIK since purchasing from the original developer in the 90's - seemed like a fortune at the time. I mostly use Silver Efex - though I believe I still have version 5. Was disappointed when I lost a bunch of my custom presets when they switched file types, I believe it only migrated a small fraction of those I had created. What I would like to see is for them to introduce an easy way to make the conversion as I haven't found a way to do so.
It took DxO over 4 months to make v6 work on my computer (huge kudos to them for persevering). That means I haven’t yet used it much and I’m tempted to jump straight to v7 but I really don’t want to go through all the faff of making it work again or, worse, it causing v6 not to work if I install v7 in parallel. I only ever use SFX anyway so although I’d like the masking tools, I think I’ll stay with v6.
Did the upgrade after trying masking tools. An old guy too and actually prefer the NIK masking vs AI. Viveza yeah doesn’t do much for me either. Been moving away from C1 to total dxo7 and NIK.
I have C1 and DXO V7 but find C1's implementation of AI masking much superior to DXO. Simply moving the cursor over the image it highlights what will be selected if I click the mouse button, so or 2 clicks and the selection is made. Very naturally, if you want to select small details you just zoom in. Then you have all the existing masking controls if you want to refine the selection eg feather, refine, luma range etc. For me, C1's masking UI is natural and intuitive. Compare that with DXO where I drop a control point, adjust the size (and hopefully shape in V8) of the area of influence, move the point around to get the best selection, then adjust luma and chroma sliders to fine tune the selection. A lot more work for what is now a simple task if the right technology is used. Being able to purchase a new licence, not upgrade, to C1 last Black Friday, for less than the upgrade cost of DXO-Photolab V7 is also noticeable. NIK integrates well with C1
I have no issue with c1 masking. I have issue with C1 and upgrade games of past several years of pay is before we tell you whats new. Time for me to move on. For what limited amount of masking I do V7 works great for me. C1 is a great program but no longer for me
In all honestly, I think they're both lacking something. C1 masking is weird though. If it worked like object selection in Lightroom then I'd be on board, but it isn't. I agree it feels more natural to click around, but it has terrible edge detection and you spend just as long finessing a mask as you would just making it from scratch in DxO.
I've been using since Nik v3, have a film and dark room background growing up so this is to me as authentic as digital gets. Absolutely love the whole collection and I was relieved wind DXO acquired the collection from Google. Kudos to the DXO developers team for quickly understanding the code base and building out new features! This is a definite buy and should be thought of as supporting the dxo developers to continue their great work.
I am using Nik Plugins since 1998 - not kidding. Bought Nik Silver Efex & Color Efex Pro. Later the Plugin suite for a hell lot money, many moons later, the Google Nik Collection. Now undecided, if i should go the Nik Collection v7 route with my old PC...better upgrade my hardware, first.
@@Andyhutchinson Yes indeed, that was my thought, too. It found a good new home at DXO, and i've never thought for ages, i'd see the day, all Nik plugins are finally fullscreen.
I have the last version of Nik...and it's...okay. After purchasing Luminar's Neo, I get a lot of effective presets thrown in with the editing program, making NIK redundant. I won't be upgrading any further.
@@Andyhutchinson Yes, I agree. Nik is great for those who don't use other programs. For my workflow, I'll take the simple preset...and PP the rest. Doing that on both ends up chaotic. The preset adjustments redundant if you are post processing in another program. For me, it's a better stand alone program...and sometimes it is enough, but not usually.
Keeping things simple for my monochrome photography, I use Nik Silver Efex Pro 2 as a plug in for Mac Photos. I try and shoot in camera a la film as much as possible with my Leica Q1. Works for me most times Andy✌️
@@AndyhutchinsonI do, I have a Leica Q1 set to high contrast mono (no way could I ever afford a Q2 mono, I want to keep my kidneys…) Nik Collection is also availed as a stand alone series of apps. Cheers Andy✌️
I’m new to the Nik Collection and I have a question. So far I’ve only tried Silver Efex, and it’s Giving me a lot of grain/ noise. Is that to be expected? Or am I missing something? Any input would be appreciated. Thank you. Great video..
I bought Nik Collection 6 as my first version. I had a trial version of Nik 5 before, but the different UI's were just horrible. Nik 6 did a hug step forward on that. I'm quite unhappy they dropped perspective, as it is something I use from time to time and it's a really nice tool. Most of all I use Silver Efex, I haven't used Dfine and Sharpener at all, I should really give it a try, especially when Topaz is not giving me the result I want. By the way, I am one of those rare people using Luminar and Nik (and ACDSee and Topaz Software - I know I have a G.A.S. for software). At the moment I don't plan to upgrade to Nik 7, although the new slesction tools are nice. I don't use too many Nik apps (I use them as standalone) for the same image, so maybe the feature of switching bet ween apps is not that imporant for me. To be honest, the elliptical selection should have been added still in Nik 6, it's not so much of a new feature like luminosity masking is.
I'm having a hard time deciding between nik collection 7 or affinity photo 2 for someone who wants to get back into doing hdr, i use photo-lab 7elite+film-pack 7 already I lean towards nik collection since i don't need the power of Photoshop like editor for my editing style but the sale price makes it more compelling atm. what are your thoughts?
If the only reason to get Affinity was for the HDR tool then I'd probably opt for the Nik suite. But if you were looking for a decent stand-in for Photoshop and planned to use its other features then it's a good option.
Viveza is the most used filter by me. Efex I use now and then. The rest, I do not use as they do not apply to my photographic subjects. I am still at 6, as 7 does not have features/updates that I require. Being just a hobby and retired, have to watch the money.
Nothing fundamental has changed in processing terms. It's faster, you get the new selective masks and the quick-change workflow. You can run 7 parallel to 4, so maybe try the 30 day trial and if you're underwhelmed, stick with 4.
What a great review! Thank you for doing it I have had the nik collection probably as long as I have had Photoshop, but it looks like the Google version I currently have no longer works with Photoshop.... When I try to launch it it fails Is it worth The price of upgrade.... Definitely given me food for thought and there is currently 20% off this week.
Maybe not. You can get the trial version and run it alongside your existing one. So give it a go and if there isn't sufficient updates that you use, then pass. :)
I used to use NIK Analog Effects but a price of 99 USD is a joke. I pay only a bit more annually for Photoshop and Lightroom so asking the same for a plug-in is a joke. No thanks.
It is a bit on the expensive side, but it's an outright purchase that you can continue using forever if you wish, whereas Adobe's subscription here is $240 per year.
@@Andyhutchinson Not strictly true that, as I have just discovered. My Nik Collection 5 is allegedly not compatible with macOS 14 Not sure what or how at present......
@@Andyhutchinson We all make mistakes, Andy, but hey! we learn from them. I'd love to buy and install Nik Cillection 7, but my Mac is old and really slow, so I'm saving and hopefully soon that will be possible. Cheers.
Very different approach to presenting this suite of plugins and much of what you say really makes sense. I've been using the Nik Collection since the 90s and had started to grow tired of DxO's very incremental updates over the past couple years. But this one is significant. Adding powerful luminosity masking and the enhanced local editing in this update make spending the money worthwhile.
Thanks for taking the time to put this well considered review together!
I appreciate that Edward - thank-you.
I have also until yesterday! See above! DXO will NOT honor my 2 NIK Collection purchases for 2 computers!
@@hawkeyeone1328 Same for me. I bought the Collection 7 yesterday during Black Friday - Not a huge sale but wanted to upgrade from 2 to 7. I was going to buy it at version 5 but when didn't want to honor my DXO Collection 2.
Thanks for the review. I had the NIK collection since 2014, used it a bit for black and white. Through a few computer upgrades I do not have it any more. I'm looking again into it because I like the outcome of Nik editing tools. So I'm looking to buy it to edit easy the photos to what I like. Your review is convincing.
They have a generous 30 day trial so you can give it a thorough test and see if it's something that works for you and your workflow :)
Another good take, Andy! I've been a long-time Nik user and am happy to see it continue, especially with the deeper integration into the overall DxO suite which I'm adopting more and more over PS / Lightroom. I like the ability to see (and learn?) what's being done to achieve a certain look rather than just letting AI "do it's thing" in a black-box. I guess I'm "old-skool", which is fine by me. :)
100% yep - learning the mechanics of changes to photos is a powerful skill because it's really hard to convince AI to do it your way. :)
Great video very entertaining and informative ! Love the dry humor !
Appreciate it - thank-you. :)
I am still on version 4, I think. I tried the 6 but didn't feel that it added anything special for the price. This one is different. I have only had an hour or so of play with it, but it seems that they have added some worthwhile features and improvements. The ability to migrate directly from one plugin to another is great. Might go for this version.
Definitely worth downloading the trial version to see if it's a good fit :)
@@Andyhutchinson I already have. We shall see.
Useful video, nicely explained. I used to use it but not now, don't think I will again.
It's certainly not for everyone.
DXO been my go to for YEARS - especially SilverEfex for my infrared photos. Was going through a photo mojo failure when they changed the interface a couple of versions ago, which contributed to 2 years of barely any processing or uploading, but now it's all coming back and actually don't mind the AI changes now. Now need to figure out how it fits into a non-Adobe workflow (once I figure out what I want to use)
I was quite late to the DxO party, but I'm a big fan of their apps and use PureRAW 4 to pre-process.
I rediscovered NIK very recently and had the same overall response as you did. Color Efex was surprisingly useful, and the luminosity masking plugged the hole in PL6 that would have otherwise required PL7 **AND** FP7 (SMH) so that alone was worth the upgrade. Additionally, just as you related, I was impressed with Dfine, using it on a particularly challenging unplanned closeup portrait taken at high ISO and with an adapted old Nikkor lens. It removed the 'bad' noise while still leaving the good 'grain' of the image. So - at least for me, still very much relevant.
Yea it's really great suite of apps that I think appeals more to the photo purist than the quick-fix crowd that would buy something like Luminar. :)
I just found this video and very much enjoyed it - very good, thank you. I recently upgraded to Nik 7 from Nik 4 and it is a big step forward for me. I also have found that Colour efex, Silver efex and Output Sharpening are the tools that I use most frequently. The improved masking ability is also extremely powerful and useful.
I switched from Lightroom to Photolab a couple of years ago and am glad that I did. I agree that the AI capabilities of Lightroom are easier to use, but prefer the DxO Photolab approach to masking and sharpening - much more control which is always a good thing!
Cheers Alexy - I think we're in the minority when it comes to those masks though ;)
Useful review! Thanks a lot Andy!
Cheers, glad it helps!
Great review, thank you. I have been a Silver Efex user for many years - the only part of NIK Collection I ever use, and I recently stumped up for v7, there is a good discount for existing users. The workflow within the plug-in is a bit odd, I agree, but you soon get used to it, and many of the presets provide really good starting points.
It is without doubt the best way to convert your photo or indeed to process one you took in B&W in the first place :)
Great video as always and I must be one of the few that love the latest iteration of the Nik Collection. I find it to be the perfect companion to DxO PhotoLab7 and with this latest upgrade, I am finding that I now only rarely pop over to Photoshop. This is mainly for object removal and general clean-up rather than any serious editing. I do wish that DxO PhotoLab would improve in this area. I do hope that DxO make the polygonal selection tool and the ability to create oval Control Points to the next upgrade of PhotoLab. Incidentally, I am, against the general coconscious, loving the Viewpoint technology. I find it gives me all the control I require. I was an an avid Capture One fan but for me DxO has the right ethos and tools to take me forward in my post-production journey.
Yea, I definitely believe DxO are onto something with their more nuanced approached to AI, but there are improvements they need to make that would make their software more popular. I reckon the improved mask functionality is a near-certainty for Photolab 8.
Another longtime NIK user here. I’m still stuck on v4, and it grates on me that there’s a very small discount available for me on an upgrade. I’m not yet convinced that I’d get my money’s worth if I jumped to v7. I most often use Color Efex and Silver Effects with occasional jumps into Analog. Yes, it would be nice to have improved selection tools, but I wonder if that’s worth the price of admission.
If it ain't broke ...
Another oldster here - been using NIK since purchasing from the original developer in the 90's - seemed like a fortune at the time. I mostly use Silver Efex - though I believe I still have version 5. Was disappointed when I lost a bunch of my custom presets when they switched file types, I believe it only migrated a small fraction of those I had created. What I would like to see is for them to introduce an easy way to make the conversion as I haven't found a way to do so.
Might be worth reaching out to them. :)
It took DxO over 4 months to make v6 work on my computer (huge kudos to them for persevering). That means I haven’t yet used it much and I’m tempted to jump straight to v7 but I really don’t want to go through all the faff of making it work again or, worse, it causing v6 not to work if I install v7 in parallel. I only ever use SFX anyway so although I’d like the masking tools, I think I’ll stay with v6.
Pretty sure it installs in parallel with existing versions but given the grief you went through I can understand the reluctance to try it!
Geez I remember Alien Skin, Boy I am getting old :) Besides that, great video as usual Andy !
Cheers Armin - believe it or not, both Alien Skin and Flaming Pear are still on sale today!
Used the NIK suite when Google owned it and gave it away for free.
What a great freebie. Not used it for many years now.
Great walk through. Thanks.
No worries :)
Thank you for sharing this wonderful review. I love Nik collection 7.,,❤🎉❤🎉
You are so welcome!
Did the upgrade after trying masking tools. An old guy too and actually prefer the NIK masking vs AI. Viveza yeah doesn’t do much for me either. Been moving away from C1 to total dxo7 and NIK.
I think the Photolab/Nik combo is powerful double-act! :)
I have C1 and DXO V7 but find C1's implementation of AI masking much superior to DXO. Simply moving the cursor over the image it highlights what will be selected if I click the mouse button, so or 2 clicks and the selection is made. Very naturally, if you want to select small details you just zoom in. Then you have all the existing masking controls if you want to refine the selection eg feather, refine, luma range etc. For me, C1's masking UI is natural and intuitive.
Compare that with DXO where I drop a control point, adjust the size (and hopefully shape in V8) of the area of influence, move the point around to get the best selection, then adjust luma and chroma sliders to fine tune the selection. A lot more work for what is now a simple task if the right technology is used.
Being able to purchase a new licence, not upgrade, to C1 last Black Friday, for less than the upgrade cost of DXO-Photolab V7 is also noticeable. NIK integrates well with C1
I have no issue with c1 masking. I have issue with C1 and upgrade games of past several years of pay is before we tell you whats new. Time for me to move on. For what limited amount of masking I do V7 works great for me. C1 is a great program but no longer for me
In all honestly, I think they're both lacking something. C1 masking is weird though. If it worked like object selection in Lightroom then I'd be on board, but it isn't. I agree it feels more natural to click around, but it has terrible edge detection and you spend just as long finessing a mask as you would just making it from scratch in DxO.
@@Andyhutchinson Poor edge detection? Which version are you using. I am referring to the AI brush/AI Eraser.
I've been using since Nik v3, have a film and dark room background growing up so this is to me as authentic as digital gets. Absolutely love the whole collection and I was relieved wind DXO acquired the collection from Google. Kudos to the DXO developers team for quickly understanding the code base and building out new features! This is a definite buy and should be thought of as supporting the dxo developers to continue their great work.
I definitely thought the suite was doomed when Google bought it, so it's great to see it under such excellent new ownership.
Excellent intro! Thank you. What I am not sure about however, is whether to use Presharpener before Define, or vice versa. Any thoughts?
You'd use it right at the start of the post-processing workflow.
I am using Nik Plugins since 1998 - not kidding. Bought Nik Silver Efex & Color Efex Pro. Later the Plugin suite for a hell lot money, many moons later, the Google Nik Collection. Now undecided, if i should go the Nik Collection v7 route with my old PC...better upgrade my hardware, first.
Yea, it's been around for a while - I'm just glad it survived Google.
@@Andyhutchinson Yes indeed, that was my thought, too. It found a good new home at DXO, and i've never thought for ages, i'd see the day, all Nik plugins are finally fullscreen.
I'm moving away from LR and Photoshop. Will these tools function in a freestanding mode? Or perhaps within a future Apple/Photomator workflow?
Yea, they work alone - you can just run any of the individual apps and open your photos. They're commonly used as plugins but don't have to be.
I have the last version of Nik...and it's...okay. After purchasing Luminar's Neo, I get a lot of effective presets thrown in with the editing program, making NIK redundant. I won't be upgrading any further.
Luminar is okay, but you surrender a lot of control over the myriad effects. :)
@@Andyhutchinson Yes, I agree. Nik is great for those who don't use other programs. For my workflow, I'll take the simple preset...and PP the rest. Doing that on both ends up chaotic. The preset adjustments redundant if you are post processing in another program.
For me, it's a better stand alone program...and sometimes it is enough, but not usually.
Keeping things simple for my monochrome photography, I use Nik Silver Efex Pro 2 as a plug in for Mac Photos. I try and shoot in camera a la film as much as possible with my Leica Q1. Works for me most times Andy✌️
Cool - do you shoot with a monochrome film sim and then post-process in Silver Efex? Sounds like a powerful combination.
@@AndyhutchinsonI do, I have a Leica Q1 set to high contrast mono (no way could I ever afford a Q2 mono, I want to keep my kidneys…) Nik Collection is also availed as a stand alone series of apps. Cheers Andy✌️
"if you know alienskin you might be as old as me", not yet but thank you for making me realize because I was in total denial 😂
lol - welcome aboard :)
I’m new to the Nik Collection and I have a question. So far I’ve only tried Silver Efex, and it’s Giving me a lot of grain/ noise. Is that to be expected? Or am I missing something? Any input would be appreciated. Thank you. Great video..
Some of the presets and film emulations add gain to give the photo that 'olde' look - but it can be removed.
Thanks Andy, great review. Could you give me a 1 word response? Nik or Topaz? Thank you, Peter.
Blimey. I just don't think Topaz is reliable enough, so ... Nik.
@@Andyhutchinson Many thanks, Andy.
I bought Nik Collection 6 as my first version. I had a trial version of Nik 5 before, but the different UI's were just horrible. Nik 6 did a hug step forward on that. I'm quite unhappy they dropped perspective, as it is something I use from time to time and it's a really nice tool. Most of all I use Silver Efex, I haven't used Dfine and Sharpener at all, I should really give it a try, especially when Topaz is not giving me the result I want. By the way, I am one of those rare people using Luminar and Nik (and ACDSee and Topaz Software - I know I have a G.A.S. for software).
At the moment I don't plan to upgrade to Nik 7, although the new slesction tools are nice. I don't use too many Nik apps (I use them as standalone) for the same image, so maybe the feature of switching bet ween apps is not that imporant for me.
To be honest, the elliptical selection should have been added still in Nik 6, it's not so much of a new feature like luminosity masking is.
It did take a while to upgrade the masking tools. Maybe they'll take that further in the next version, perhaps with AI masking.
I'm having a hard time deciding between nik collection 7 or affinity photo 2 for someone who wants to get back into doing hdr, i use photo-lab 7elite+film-pack 7 already I lean towards nik collection since i don't need the power of Photoshop like editor for my editing style but the sale price makes it more compelling atm. what are your thoughts?
If the only reason to get Affinity was for the HDR tool then I'd probably opt for the Nik suite. But if you were looking for a decent stand-in for Photoshop and planned to use its other features then it's a good option.
Thank you!
Viveza is the most used filter by me. Efex I use now and then. The rest, I do not use as they do not apply to my photographic subjects. I am still at 6, as 7 does not have features/updates that I require. Being just a hobby and retired, have to watch the money.
Sounds like a sensible way of doing it :)
dxo took nik software to whole new level
It's in safe hands. :)
Use the NIK 6 - most time the silver effect only, need tom be sure the silver effect NIK 7 is better otherwise I'll keep my NIK6
It installs parallel to version 6, in its own folder, so you can test it and keep the old version in case.
I only ever use Silver Efex in the Nik Collection, so is there any reason to update from version 4?
Nothing fundamental has changed in processing terms. It's faster, you get the new selective masks and the quick-change workflow. You can run 7 parallel to 4, so maybe try the 30 day trial and if you're underwhelmed, stick with 4.
Thanks @@Andyhutchinson !
What a great review! Thank you for doing it
I have had the nik collection probably as long as I have had Photoshop, but it looks like the Google version I currently have no longer works with Photoshop.... When I try to launch it it fails
Is it worth The price of upgrade....
Definitely given me food for thought and there is currently 20% off this week.
Glad it was helpful!
so I have V 4. Is it really worth paying for V 7 ?
Maybe not. You can get the trial version and run it alongside your existing one. So give it a go and if there isn't sufficient updates that you use, then pass. :)
I am bowing… but it makes my back sore. 😳
lol - thank-you :)
I did use all of the plug-ins you mentioned - I’ve been using Photoshop and Illustrator since v1. Time flies!
I used to use NIK Analog Effects but a price of 99 USD is a joke. I pay only a bit more annually for Photoshop and Lightroom so asking the same for a plug-in is a joke. No thanks.
It is a bit on the expensive side, but it's an outright purchase that you can continue using forever if you wish, whereas Adobe's subscription here is $240 per year.
@@Andyhutchinson Not strictly true that, as I have just discovered. My Nik Collection 5 is allegedly not compatible with macOS 14 Not sure what or how at present......
Mmm... I thought the word was "relevant". I'm not a native speaker so it probably is correct.
You're quite right. I am a native speaker and managed to get it wrong in both the thumbnail and the title. 😂
@@Andyhutchinson We all make mistakes, Andy, but hey! we learn from them. I'd love to buy and install Nik Cillection 7, but my Mac is old and really slow, so I'm saving and hopefully soon that will be possible. Cheers.
LOL Ritalin 10
Without which, I wouldn't get much done ...