Education is already mandatory and quite frankly I think Sagan would agree with Asimov: "There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there always has been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that "my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge."
I was in a miserable mood today , so I decided to use the strongest antidote against petty anger and superficial worries : the soothing voice and the wisdom of Carl Sagan. Always works. Thank you, Carl!
The first time I heard this Carl Sagan's words I felt so overwhelmed that I couldn't stop crying. Even now, years later and just a day after the 2024 Solar eclipse, I still come looking for this just to remind me that my problems are so small, that we are so insignificant and so important at the same time.
I've read that that's a Serbian proverb, but do you happen to know anything more about it? How old is it? What was the original context? And how literally was it meant? I'd love to know, but haven't been able to find any more on it.
I cry nearly every time I listen to this. It is so beautiful to think about. As a victim of long term abuse, it reminds me not to lash out in return. But instead to open my arms to as many people I can. Let's try to preserve this Pale Blue Dot... and each other.
Dear Jim, Please know that your impact on everyone you meet is profound. You are seen. And your life is NOT defined by those who are unkind to you. I wish you well! Greetings from London: the sun is struggling, and there is a slight chill in the air. Spring is trying! 👋🏼
@@chocomoon9022there's even more dying in Afghanistan, Egypt and Yemen and Iran , while Palestine isn't a country nor any significant philosophers or musicians
There is a Brazilian portuguese version here on UA-cam by Guilherme Briggs, the same guys who dubbed Buzz Lightyear in Toy Story... You can imagine how heavy it is
Every time I hear this my eyes water and a lump forms in my throat. Yet I still come back to it time and again to remind myself of why it's so important not to forget.
There are two lines in particular that really stand out for me. 1. Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors so that, in glory and triumph, they could become the momentary masters of a fraction, of a dot. 2. There is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image. Thank you Carl for being such an inspiration.
Carl Sagan "The Cosmos is all that is or was or ever will be." Carl Sagan, "I can’t imagine anyone denying the existence of the laws of nature, but I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." More from the dumbass, "It’s perfectly possible that the universe is infinitely old and therefore uncaused. In fact, there are detailed cosmological models that hold such a view and that are consistent with everything we know. To my mind, it seems not fully satisfactory to say that there was a first cause. That seems to postpone dealing with the problem rather than solving it. If we say “God” made the universe, then surely the next question is, “Who made God?” If we say “God” was always here, why not say the universe was always here? If we say that the question “Where did God come from?” is too tough for us poor mortals to understand, then why not say that the question of, “Where did the universe come from?” is too tough for us mortals? In what way, exactly, does the God hypothesis advance our knowledge of cosmology? What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?" from: www.uscatholic.org/articles/202001/god-and-carl-sagan-cosmos-big-enough-both-them-31939 Read the article. Have a vomit bag or trash can nearby for what a hypocritical, lying, mocking, disgusting, foolish person he was. Now, Carl the dumbass NEVER can get around these laws and what the lead to... Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. ....yet the buffoon thinks creation happened naturally, but the idiot says, "What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?" as the crap-for-brains ignores the CLEAR science that creation had to happen by God supernaturally! Still the fool who ignores the laws farted out, "I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." Notice his mocking God, "man in the sky" as if that makes him look smart as he completely ignores the evidence. His question, "Who made God?" is as dumb as he is. So in his way of foolish thinking, if a supernatural creator created the natural realm, then that supernatural creator who created the natural realm with its natural laws has then become also bound by those natural laws the supernatural creator created. So explain why a supernatural creator is also bound by the laws the supernatural creator created. Or, show how smart you are and just give your science for creation happening naturally and don't forget to give your science how the natural laws were created, too. If he wanted to act smart, it may be a good idea to actually show you are. Sagan the dumbass will at some point face his Maker for his judgment of what he believed in this life. His extreme shame and regret was all his choice. He wanted to be a hypocritical dumbass. Then he'll be thrown into the lake of fire. It will be his 'The End' and be remembered no more. ALL his choice and for others who follow that fool.
@@2fast2block Interesting how having an agnostic stance to an unprovable supposition makes someone who has contributed so much to humanity a "dumbass" in the eyes of someone who probably wouldn't want anyone to even know how tenuous their own record of accomplishments are. Instead of being pompous on the internet, or insulting dead men, why not contribute to society? Do good in the now.
@@Lasair517 waste of life and resources, I gave science and you give flatulence. You just prove you can't get around what I wrote. Stop playing with yourself and actually prove me wrong. Look at a wuss you are unable to give science how creation happened naturally. Just keep rubbing yourself since it's all you know what to do when asked to show something.
To say that this has had a significant impact on my life would be a severe understatement. I wish that I had found this speech when I was just a young child, but I am glad that I did find it at 18. This was the greatest way to readjust my perspective on life during 2020 when the world went through a pandemic. I know to never stop savoring every moment on this planet and I hope to follow in Carl Sagan's footsteps and study astrophysics myself.
Do it man, I started an astrophysics degree at 27, you're never too old and it's never too late. Chase your dreams, we get but one chance at this journey atop our blue marble, make the most of it and chase what you love
@@thebeardedastronomer thank you for writing this, it's very encouraging for me. I'm 27 and there's quite a road ahead of me to get to the position of being able to study astrophysics, but I won't give up.
Benjamin. ..it was a PLANdemic..Event 201 of the UN. Wake up! Planned destruction, of us, the humans! They use air, water, pharma, soil, entertainment, info...all poisoned I'm being censored right now! !!
This is garbage is all it is. Carl Sagan "The Cosmos is all that is or was or ever will be." Carl Sagan, "I can’t imagine anyone denying the existence of the laws of nature, but I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." More from the dumbass, "It’s perfectly possible that the universe is infinitely old and therefore uncaused. In fact, there are detailed cosmological models that hold such a view and that are consistent with everything we know. To my mind, it seems not fully satisfactory to say that there was a first cause. That seems to postpone dealing with the problem rather than solving it. If we say “God” made the universe, then surely the next question is, “Who made God?” If we say “God” was always here, why not say the universe was always here? If we say that the question “Where did God come from?” is too tough for us poor mortals to understand, then why not say that the question of, “Where did the universe come from?” is too tough for us mortals? In what way, exactly, does the God hypothesis advance our knowledge of cosmology? What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?" from: www.uscatholic.org/articles/202001/god-and-carl-sagan-cosmos-big-enough-both-them-31939 Read the article. Have a vomit bag or trash can nearby for what a hypocritical, lying, mocking, disgusting, foolish person he was. Now, Carl the dumbass NEVER can get around these laws and what the lead to... Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. ....yet the buffoon thinks creation happened naturally, but the idiot says, "What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?" as the crap-for-brains ignores the CLEAR science that creation had to happen by God supernaturally! Still the fool who ignores the laws farted out, "I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." Notice his mocking God, "man in the sky" as if that makes him look smart as he completely ignores the evidence. His question, "Who made God?" is as dumb as he is. So in his way of foolish thinking, if a supernatural creator created the natural realm, then that supernatural creator who created the natural realm with its natural laws has then become also bound by those natural laws the supernatural creator created. So explain why a supernatural creator is also bound by the laws the supernatural creator created. Or, show how smart you are and just give your science for creation happening naturally and don't forget to give your science how the natural laws were created, too. If he wanted to act smart, it may be a good idea to actually show you are. Sagan the dumbass will at some point face his Maker for his judgment of what he believed in this life. His extreme shame and regret was all his choice. He wanted to be a hypocritical dumbass. Then he'll be thrown into the lake of fire. It will be his 'The End' and be remembered no more. ALL his choice and for others who follow that fool.
@@2fast2block I’ve seen you on other youtube videos, and you’ve said nearly the exact same thing every time. How sad and lonely do you have to be to come to every UA-cam video dedicated to Carl Sagan and say something as horrible as that. Get a life mate, don’t waste it saying all of this rubbish.
@@babyyoda9943 that was sure a gassy reply that never addressed what I wrote to prove it wrong. I'm sure you have more gas to let out that is clueless.
I remember when I had first watched this. I and my class were watching this and the teacher had given us no indication that this speech was coming. As this was played in front of us, all of us sat still, mesmerized. After the episode finished, all I remember hearing was the projector's quite hum and seeing the wonder on my classmates' faces. I truly hope that every person and especially children get to experience this fantastic documentary series once. It transformed my life and given the opportunity, will do the same for many more people.
@@Andrew-JohnsonI don’t care what claims your Jesus made about his divinity. What matters to those of us who don’t turn to religious texts is the wisdom that will allow us to better live with each other. Christ actually had words worth pondering on that subject, but in my opinion, none of them were better than these.
I watch this when I'm feeling horribly sad. Went through a hard breakup, and I watch this on repeat to help reset and center myself, just to see how tiny this moment is, in this vast universe.
I am sorry about your breakup. Those hurt. Carl was clueless though in thinking this all came about on its own with NO proof. I turn to God that has all the proof.
@@2fast2blockFine, as Sagan would have been the first to tell you. If your religion works for you, then by all means embrace it. Many of us are not obligated to feel the same way, however. Not yet, anyway.
@@michaelhall2709 Carl the liar couldn't even get past BASIC science. The 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, energy can only change forms, energy creation/destruction can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. Creation had to be done supernaturally at some point.
Science deals with what can be observed. The supernatural cannot be observed or measured. It is an assertion! You say “it had to be done supernaturally”. What else could it be, right? That’s an argument from ignorance, it’s a logical fallacy.
Look again at that dot. That's here. That's home. That's us. On it everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives. The aggregate of our joy and suffering, thousands of confident religions, ideologies, and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilization, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every mother and father, hopeful child, inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every "superstar," every "supreme leader," every saint and sinner in the history of our species lived there--on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam. The Earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena. Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors so that, in glory and triumph, they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot. Think of the endless cruelties visited by the inhabitants of one corner of this pixel on the scarcely distinguishable inhabitants of some other corner, how frequent their misunderstandings, how eager they are to kill one another, how fervent their hatreds. Our posturings, our imagined self-importance, the delusion that we have some privileged position in the Universe, are challenged by this point of pale light. Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark. In our obscurity, in all this vastness, there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves. The Earth is the only world known so far to harbor life. There is nowhere else, at least in the near future, to which our species could migrate. Visit, yes. Settle, not yet. Like it or not, for the moment the Earth is where we make our stand. It has been said that astronomy is a humbling and character-building experience. There is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world. To me, it underscores our responsibility to deal more kindly with one another, and to preserve and cherish the pale blue dot, the only home we've ever known. -- Carl Sagan, Pale Blue Dot, 1994
Carl Sagan "The Cosmos is all that is or was or ever will be." Carl Sagan, "I can’t imagine anyone denying the existence of the laws of nature, but I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." More from the dumbass, "It’s perfectly possible that the universe is infinitely old and therefore uncaused. In fact, there are detailed cosmological models that hold such a view and that are consistent with everything we know. To my mind, it seems not fully satisfactory to say that there was a first cause. That seems to postpone dealing with the problem rather than solving it. If we say “God” made the universe, then surely the next question is, “Who made God?” If we say “God” was always here, why not say the universe was always here? If we say that the question “Where did God come from?” is too tough for us poor mortals to understand, then why not say that the question of, “Where did the universe come from?” is too tough for us mortals? In what way, exactly, does the God hypothesis advance our knowledge of cosmology? What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?" from: www.uscatholic.org/articles/202001/god-and-carl-sagan-cosmos-big-enough-both-them-31939 Read the article. Have a vomit bag or trash can nearby for what a hypocritical, lying, mocking, disgusting, foolish person he was. Now, Carl the dumbass NEVER can get around these laws and what the lead to... Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. ....yet the buffoon thinks creation happened naturally, but the idiot says, "What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?" as the crap-for-brains ignores the CLEAR science that creation had to happen by God supernaturally! Still the fool who ignores the laws farted out, "I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." Notice his mocking God, "man in the sky" as if that makes him look smart as he completely ignores the evidence. His question, "Who made God?" is as dumb as he is. So in his way of foolish thinking, if a supernatural creator created the natural realm, then that supernatural creator who created the natural realm with its natural laws has then become also bound by those natural laws the supernatural creator created. So explain why a supernatural creator is also bound by the laws the supernatural creator created. Or, show how smart you are and just give your science for creation happening naturally and don't forget to give your science how the natural laws were created, too. If he wanted to act smart, it may be a good idea to actually show you are. Sagan the dumbass will at some point face his Maker for his judgment of what he believed in this life. His extreme shame and regret was all his choice. He wanted to be a hypocritical dumbass. Then he'll be thrown into the lake of fire. It will be his 'The End' and be remembered no more. ALL his choice and for others who follow that fool.
@@2fast2block good quotes form Carl Sagan. he truly was brilliant and one of the best teachers weve had in our lifetimes. u know he had like 30 honorary doctorates. if you dont agree with most of the things he teaches, then you dont agree with the last 400 years of the brightest minds on the planet working together to try to figure out whats true about the world. u dont agree with science. its the very arrogance he speaks of. how could you possibly understand more about the universe and its creation than the smartest people of the last 400 yearsall working together.
@@2fast2block I’m assuming your basing your opinion on a religious ideology. “Lake of fire” quote just because you don’t agree with someone based on their beliefs system, doesn’t mean you’re right to mock and belittle someone. The fact is, that we mere humans don’t know if we were created by a spiritual being or we just evolved, the fact is that we don’t truly know. There’s a possibility that a creator of some sort created humanity, earth, and all living things. Yet we live in a vastly imperfect world with many unanswered questions. We didn’t come from nothing, we came from something. What that is exactLy? I don’t know but there’s something magical devine and possibly spiritual wether that’s called a god, a spirit, an alien, or science we evolve and this world 🌎 is just too perfectly created for us humans to survive in it. Yes religions don’t have all the answers, all religions have been created by mankind our of a need to be connected with something higher than ourselves. I choose not believe in religion, but I choose not to deny the possibility of something higher than ourselves. Maybe we’re all godly beings living in a world experience, who knows but there’s something far greater than our own understanding that has to exist simply because it’ll be illogical to think otherwise
@@chgofirefighter you are a loser who just makes up things and refuses to look at what was put in front of empty you. "The fact is, that we mere humans don’t know if we were created by a spiritual being or we just evolved, the fact is that we don’t truly know." I gave laws of science that prove what we KNOW and the universe had to be created supernaturally. What in your excess bowel gas reply did you give that gave reason to doubt those laws? Oh, you couldn't give any. Losers like you pay no attention to that since it's easy to ignore reality so you can be the misfits you love to be.
Imagine if everyone, especially people in power, held this cosmic perspective of our place in the universe. Surely, our problems would shrink, and the world would be a much better place.
this is, in my opinion, the best and more important message that humanity have ever said, and said it to its own. But only a few have heard and undestood... RIP Carl.
Carl's message ranks at the top of my list as the most succinct and eloquent sermon for humans ever delivered. This is also a poem - a poem that pleads to every heart and mind that occupies the pale blue dot.
This is by far the best visualization made for that fragment of the book. Even though I prefer the audio quality of the original recording (it's kind of softer), this cleaned-up version suits this video better.
I love the first four chapters of the book (printed or audio), which I think could stand alone as a treatise on our place in the universe. Humbling in the perspective it shows us, but it ends up inspiring us to go on to greater things.
To me this sounds like a newer recording, not just cleaned up. I really love the first one, especially with Vangelis music, everything falls to place with it in such a natural way
Whoever convinced him to narrate this book should get an award. Posthumously if they aren't still with us. His other books are fine works, but his narration... it rises to high art at times.
@@truthserum5202 He wrote several books, and this is the only one he narrated. Authors rarely narrate their own books, and usually that's a good thing.
Thank you so much for this video. Every time I feel scared or uncomfortable, I watch this, and it makes everything better. I love you all, fellow Earthlings!
Yes, go to sleep and think of clueless Carl and his lies. How nice. Carl Sagan "The Cosmos is all that is or was or ever will be." Carl Sagan, "I can’t imagine anyone denying the existence of the laws of nature, but I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." More from the clueless Carl, --It’s perfectly possible that the universe is infinitely old and therefore uncaused. In fact, there are detailed cosmological models that hold such a view and that are consistent with everything we know. To my mind, it seems not fully satisfactory to say that there was a first cause. That seems to postpone dealing with the problem rather than solving it. If we say “God” made the universe, then surely the next question is, “Who made God?” If we say “God” was always here, why not say the universe was always here? If we say that the question “Where did God come from?” is too tough for us poor mortals to understand, then why not say that the question of, “Where did the universe come from?” is too tough for us mortals? In what way, exactly, does the God hypothesis advance our knowledge of cosmology? What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?"-- from: www.uscatholic.org/articles/202001/god-and-carl-sagan-cosmos-big-enough-both-them-31939 Read the article. Have a laugh for what a hypocritical, lying, mocking, disgusting, person he was. Carl cannot get around these laws and what they lead to... Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. ....yet he thinks creation happened naturally, "What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?" He ignores the CLEAR science that creation had to happen by God supernaturally! Still, he ignores the laws... "I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." Notice his mocking God, "man in the sky" as if that makes him look smart as he completely ignores the evidence. His question, "Who made God?" is as pathetic as he is. So in his way of useless thinking, if a supernatural creator created the natural realm, then that supernatural creator who created the natural realm with its natural laws has then become also bound by those natural laws the supernatural creator created. So explain why a supernatural creator is also bound by the laws the supernatural creator created. Or, show how smart you are and just give your science for creation happening naturally, and don't forget to give your science how the natural laws were created, too. If he wanted to act smart, it may be a good idea to actually show you are. Sagan lived his empty life clueless and has clueless followers.
@@2fast2block Sounds like Carl Sagan was 100% correct and you're stuck in the Stone Age. Get with the times, kid. Humanity is leaving religion and seeing it for the lie it is. Your "god" is simply a pastiche of other pagan faiths thrown together. Jesus, Mithras, Horus all VERY similar stories. Too similar. We are all we have, all we ever will have, and there is no afterlife, nor a return to this one. Science has proven this. Think on that. You are wrong, and your pastors LIED TO YOU. No replies will be seen or read. You have been told.
I’ve heard these words for years and they still fill my eyes with tears. I wish we grew as a species and recognized our Lilliputian place in the cosmos.
Nice as it would be, more importantly is that we need more people to follow in their footsteps and carry on what they started. We can't get them back, but we can strive to follow their examples and each strive to leave the world a little better place than it was when we arrived.
The problem is those who most need to listen to, and follow the examples of, those men will never do either. It is a cripplingly sad reality that, for many of us, our ideologies have become so entrenched, so a part of our very existences, that we cannot see past them any more than we can see past a brick wall. And, we would literally rather die before we'd ever compromise on our precious ideologies.
@@IanHalsallmusic Ok, "good work - very well presented - arguments slightly weak (absurd), difficult to understand (idiotic), poorly constructed - fuck you" And your evidence to back what you said up.... (blank) You're as much as a fool as you are a pathetic wimp.
@Harsh Raval so, to your slow brain, you got around what I wrote with... "JESUS WAS THE IMPOSTER and his father POS." Now that you had your orgasm making your useless reply in your pathetic waste of life, do copy and paste the science that was in that word barf that gave us creation naturally and got around the laws I gave. Or, keep being the clown you love to be.
I consider this to be the greatest speech in human history! Everyone living on Earth should hear and see this and know that self destruction, war and divide is not the answer. The answer lies in science, united together to build the future together and preserve life on Earth before venturing the uncover the secrets of the cosmos.
Oftentimes, when I am feeling the worst about the world, myself, and my place in the world, I return to this video. And always, even if just for a fleeting moment, Carl's words make me feel better.
I've found myself coming back to this video every couple of months for the last several years. I've always seen it as a way to level and remind myself how little small problems truly are. While Sagan passed shortly after I was born, he's helped me grow up with this excerpt alone. Now, I'm using this as a center point for one of my final courses in college. As I approach the end of my journey with this degree, I wonder how I'll influence this 'pale blue dot' around me. If I can make a fraction of an impact like Sagan did during his time on Earth, I'll be a happy man.
I grew up under the wisdom of Carl Sagan, and others of his caliber. In other words, I got to grow up, be mentored and inspired by the very finest , profound minds - all having built on the wisdom of past great minds. If you do not see people like this in your children's lives today - seek them out. This planet needs more inspiring.
@@poopchubbincorporated3901 got it, you have nothing to show I'm wrong so you think this was somehow in some way a good reply that does nothing... "calm down there and take your mood stabilizers" You must have thought hard and long on that being what a dingbat you are.
@@2fast2block i never said you're wrong or right, i just said that you're acting like an anger-driven grandpa by pasting textwalls under people's comments who won't ever care enough to read them, and i thought about the mood stabilizers part in 4 seconds, which is probably less than how long it took you to type out that textwall under this comment
@@2fast2block did you not take the mood stabilizers because it looks like all you're capable of doing is insulting others, proven by your entire online presence
@@poopchubbincorporated3901 " it looks like all you're capable of doing is insulting others" Says the b-itch who rubs themself to 0rgasm ignoring the evidence I gave. Rub away, you waste of life.
Because you're clueless like Carl was. Carl Sagan "The Cosmos is all that is or was or ever will be." Carl Sagan, "I can’t imagine anyone denying the existence of the laws of nature, but I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." More from the clueless Carl, --It’s perfectly possible that the universe is infinitely old and therefore uncaused. In fact, there are detailed cosmological models that hold such a view and that are consistent with everything we know. To my mind, it seems not fully satisfactory to say that there was a first cause. That seems to postpone dealing with the problem rather than solving it. If we say “God” made the universe, then surely the next question is, “Who made God?” If we say “God” was always here, why not say the universe was always here? If we say that the question “Where did God come from?” is too tough for us poor mortals to understand, then why not say that the question of, “Where did the universe come from?” is too tough for us mortals? In what way, exactly, does the God hypothesis advance our knowledge of cosmology? What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?"-- from: www.uscatholic.org/articles/202001/god-and-carl-sagan-cosmos-big-enough-both-them-31939 Read the article. Have a laugh for what a hypocritical, lying, mocking, disgusting, person he was. Carl cannot get around these laws and what they lead to... Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. ....yet he thinks creation happened naturally, "What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?" He ignores the CLEAR science that creation had to happen by God supernaturally! Still, he ignores the laws... "I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." Notice his mocking God, "man in the sky" as if that makes him look smart as he completely ignores the evidence. His question, "Who made God?" is as pathetic as he is. So in his way of useless thinking, if a supernatural creator created the natural realm, then that supernatural creator who created the natural realm with its natural laws has then become also bound by those natural laws the supernatural creator created. So explain why a supernatural creator is also bound by the laws the supernatural creator created. Or, show how smart you are and just give your science for creation happening naturally, and don't forget to give your science how the natural laws were created, too. If he wanted to act smart, it may be a good idea to actually show you are. Sagan lived his empty life clueless and has clueless followers.
Carl Sagan "The Cosmos is all that is or was or ever will be." Carl Sagan, "I can’t imagine anyone denying the existence of the laws of nature, but I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." More from the dumbass, "It’s perfectly possible that the universe is infinitely old and therefore uncaused. In fact, there are detailed cosmological models that hold such a view and that are consistent with everything we know. To my mind, it seems not fully satisfactory to say that there was a first cause. That seems to postpone dealing with the problem rather than solving it. If we say “God” made the universe, then surely the next question is, “Who made God?” If we say “God” was always here, why not say the universe was always here? If we say that the question “Where did God come from?” is too tough for us poor mortals to understand, then why not say that the question of, “Where did the universe come from?” is too tough for us mortals? In what way, exactly, does the God hypothesis advance our knowledge of cosmology? What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?" from: www.uscatholic.org/articles/202001/god-and-carl-sagan-cosmos-big-enough-both-them-31939 Read the article. Have a vomit bag or trash can nearby for what a hypocritical, lying, mocking, disgusting, foolish person he was. Now, Carl the dumbass NEVER can get around these laws and what the lead to... Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. ....yet the buffoon thinks creation happened naturally, but the idiot says, "What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?" as the crap-for-brains ignores the CLEAR science that creation had to happen by God supernaturally! Still the fool who ignores the laws farted out, "I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." Notice his mocking God, "man in the sky" as if that makes him look smart as he completely ignores the evidence. His question, "Who made God?" is as dumb as he is. So in his way of foolish thinking, if a supernatural creator created the natural realm, then that supernatural creator who created the natural realm with its natural laws has then become also bound by those natural laws the supernatural creator created. So explain why a supernatural creator is also bound by the laws the supernatural creator created. Or, show how smart you are and just give your science for creation happening naturally and don't forget to give your science how the natural laws were created, too. If he wanted to act smart, it may be a good idea to actually show you are. Sagan the dumbass will at some point face his Maker for his judgment of what he believed in this life. His extreme shame and regret was all his choice. He wanted to be a hypocritical dumbass. Then he'll be thrown into the lake of fire. It will be his 'The End' and be remembered no more. ALL his choice and for others who follow that fool.
Ken, every single time I watch this I tear up! Every - single - time. No matter how much I think I am used to it, it just HITS me every time! It sums up humanity, sums up everything said in every book and every religious text and every political doctrine; it speaks for Earth itself. In retrospect, we see that only Sagan COULD have been the man responsible for the record on Voyager I, as a greeting to the cosmos.
me too ! just shows how similar we are , no matter if we come from rich countries or poor , cold or hot , west or the east , the truth strikes everyone ! because we are all HUMANS
carl, your molecules are scattered amongst our earth. you quite literally have transformed to become the air we breathe, the grass we see, the water we drink. you live on, as do your ideas and passion. may you rest well. thank you.
This video should be translated into all available languages and should be played in all the schools, colleges, universities and specialy in Parliaments for the sake of this beautiful and rare planet.
The visual of the Earth nearly filling the frame, and then slowly receding to nothing but a dot in a sunbeam with the other planets passing by (except Uranus), combined with the soothing music, and Sagan’s mellow narration, really makes this more emotional than it ever could have been in my opinion. The piano at the end (3:05) with Neptune flying by, literally almost made me shed a tear. Rest in peace, Carl Sagan. You may be gone, but you will never be forgotten.
That's an interesting thought, but, on balance, I think this version works in that it leaves you appreciating the wonder of the pale blue dot, whereas your version would lose that. Perhaps it depends on whether you're familiar with this speech or not; your version might work for those who have never encountered it before.
Every politician on the planet should look at this video to remind them that no matter how big their bombs are, humans are truly insignificant fighting over nothing.
Every being comes into this world as the center of the universe. We spend our whole lives widening our scope to include everything else that is, if we work hard enough at it. This is true of you, as well. This is just as true of our species as it is true for the individuals of our species. We will grow in time. What other species can you name that has come to know ourselves and the world(s) around us as we have. We may not be the only game in the universe, but we are the only game in the solar system. We can be a little cocky, but life itself is the great humbler.
I agree--we may live on a mote of dust, but we can think and reason and discover and question and understand, which is something to be proud of. In his 1965 astronomy education book, "Challenge of the Universe," Dr. J. Allen Hynek wrote to his readers (mostly middle school and high school students) that they need not feel insignificant, knowing that the Earth is just a point in space. He wrote, "In the final analysis, the mind that encompasses the universe is greater than the universe that encompasses the mind."
@@j.jasonwentworth723 If you follow Carl you don't think and reason. Carl Sagan "The Cosmos is all that is or was or ever will be." Carl Sagan, "I can’t imagine anyone denying the existence of the laws of nature, but I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." More from the clueless Carl, --It’s perfectly possible that the universe is infinitely old and therefore uncaused. In fact, there are detailed cosmological models that hold such a view and that are consistent with everything we know. To my mind, it seems not fully satisfactory to say that there was a first cause. That seems to postpone dealing with the problem rather than solving it. If we say “God” made the universe, then surely the next question is, “Who made God?” If we say “God” was always here, why not say the universe was always here? If we say that the question “Where did God come from?” is too tough for us poor mortals to understand, then why not say that the question of, “Where did the universe come from?” is too tough for us mortals? In what way, exactly, does the God hypothesis advance our knowledge of cosmology? What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?"-- from: www.uscatholic.org/articles/202001/god-and-carl-sagan-cosmos-big-enough-both-them-31939 Read the article. Have a laugh for what a hypocritical, lying, mocking, disgusting, person he was. Carl cannot get around these laws and what they lead to... Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. ....yet he thinks creation happened naturally, "What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?" He ignores the CLEAR science that creation had to happen by God supernaturally! Still, he ignores the laws... "I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." Notice his mocking God, "man in the sky" as if that makes him look smart as he completely ignores the evidence. His question, "Who made God?" is as pathetic as he is. So in his way of useless thinking, if a supernatural creator created the natural realm, then that supernatural creator who created the natural realm with its natural laws has then become also bound by those natural laws the supernatural creator created. So explain why a supernatural creator is also bound by the laws the supernatural creator created. Or, show how smart you are and just give your science for creation happening naturally, and don't forget to give your science how the natural laws were created, too. If he wanted to act smart, it may be a good idea to actually show you are. Sagan lived his empty life clueless and has clueless followers.
When I get too much information about all these wars and conflicts going on all over the world I think about or come back to this video. Here we are doing that again, in the same place on the same spots. For the same reasons. Learned a lot since he first made this, and we put it all into doing the same old stuff.
That belief--that "the human race is doomed"--can very easily become a self-fulfilling prophecy. It is also very far from being a new notion; in every age, people have said the same thing, but so far, every prediction of it happening (usually in the days of the utterers, or soon afterward) has proved wrong. I take solace in that reassuring statistic. One day, humanity *may* destroy itself (or, like Rome, but on a global scale, may descend into barbarism for one reason or another), but if we just give up and accept it as inevitable, it will be more likely to happen because no one will be working to create a better future.
Carl Sagan "The Cosmos is all that is or was or ever will be." Carl Sagan, "I can’t imagine anyone denying the existence of the laws of nature, but I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." More from the dumbass, "It’s perfectly possible that the universe is infinitely old and therefore uncaused. In fact, there are detailed cosmological models that hold such a view and that are consistent with everything we know. To my mind, it seems not fully satisfactory to say that there was a first cause. That seems to postpone dealing with the problem rather than solving it. If we say “God” made the universe, then surely the next question is, “Who made God?” If we say “God” was always here, why not say the universe was always here? If we say that the question “Where did God come from?” is too tough for us poor mortals to understand, then why not say that the question of, “Where did the universe come from?” is too tough for us mortals? In what way, exactly, does the God hypothesis advance our knowledge of cosmology? What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?" from: www.uscatholic.org/articles/202001/god-and-carl-sagan-cosmos-big-enough-both-them-31939 Read the article. Have a vomit bag or trash can nearby for what a hypocritical, lying, mocking, disgusting, foolish person he was. Now, Carl the dumbass NEVER can get around these laws and what the lead to... Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. ....yet the buffoon thinks creation happened naturally, but the idiot says, "What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?" as the crap-for-brains ignores the CLEAR science that creation had to happen by God supernaturally! Still the fool who ignores the laws farted out, "I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." Notice his mocking God, "man in the sky" as if that makes him look smart as he completely ignores the evidence. His question, "Who made God?" is as dumb as he is. So in his way of foolish thinking, if a supernatural creator created the natural realm, then that supernatural creator who created the natural realm with its natural laws has then become also bound by those natural laws the supernatural creator created. So explain why a supernatural creator is also bound by the laws the supernatural creator created. Or, show how smart you are and just give your science for creation happening naturally and don't forget to give your science how the natural laws were created, too. If he wanted to act smart, it may be a good idea to actually show you are. Sagan the dumbass will at some point face his Maker for his judgment of what he believed in this life. His extreme shame and regret was all his choice. He wanted to be a hypocritical dumbass. Then he'll be thrown into the lake of fire. It will be his 'The End' and be remembered no more. ALL his choice and for others who follow that fool.
I'm 61 years old, and this proves that one never stop learning and discovering new things. Thanks to a fine man I had the opportunity to listen this speech. Very motivational indeed and to know that this Pale Blue Dot still has lots of good humans, like Mr. Carl Sagan, who can make this place a better one.
Carl didn't make this place any better spreading his lies. Be real. The 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LoT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. It is clear creation had to be done supernaturally yet it is still denied because people are just too proud to accept that, among other things. Asking how God was created as if that answered something is downright silly. Your question doesn't even make sense. Clearly creation had to be done by a supernatural creator. A supernatural who created the natural realm of time, space, and matter, along with the natural laws that govern it, is not bound by the natural laws the supernatural creator created. That's basic logic but you are NOT logical.
What a great remastering of a timeless classic. Carl, you were beautifully poetic in life, and your words will resonate and continue with time with those whom have a mind to listen.
I listened to this in middle school and it's still stuck with me until now, thank you for this wonderful piece❤️ it really motivates me to help save the earth
I have always watched this so many times to lift my spirit whenever I feel low. The deep and calming voice and the awesome wisdom of the narration instantly hits you hard and makes you realize how most of our worries are over worthless stuff and brings you back to reality. It refreshes your thoughts and even makes you feel ashamed at times about the time we waste worrying over superficial hardships of our lives. It also makes you feel that we are so fortunate to be at such a beautiful and happening location in such a vast and endless darkness of space.
I listen to this when I'm distressed. I listen when I can't sleep at night, and I wonder how I can make ends meet. Carl's words seem to put it all into a better perspective for me. I don't know how or why, but I feel comforted by these words.
Yeah, don't listen to what God says in the bible, go by clueless Carl's words. Carl Sagan "The Cosmos is all that is or was or ever will be." Carl Sagan, "I can’t imagine anyone denying the existence of the laws of nature, but I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." More from the clueless Carl, --It’s perfectly possible that the universe is infinitely old and therefore uncaused. In fact, there are detailed cosmological models that hold such a view and that are consistent with everything we know. To my mind, it seems not fully satisfactory to say that there was a first cause. That seems to postpone dealing with the problem rather than solving it. If we say “God” made the universe, then surely the next question is, “Who made God?” If we say “God” was always here, why not say the universe was always here? If we say that the question “Where did God come from?” is too tough for us poor mortals to understand, then why not say that the question of, “Where did the universe come from?” is too tough for us mortals? In what way, exactly, does the God hypothesis advance our knowledge of cosmology? What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?"-- from: www.uscatholic.org/articles/202001/god-and-carl-sagan-cosmos-big-enough-both-them-31939 Read the article. Have a laugh for what a hypocritical, lying, mocking, disgusting, person he was. Carl cannot get around these laws and what they lead to... Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. ....yet he thinks creation happened naturally, "What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?" He ignores the CLEAR science that creation had to happen by God supernaturally! Still, he ignores the laws... "I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." Notice his mocking God, "man in the sky" as if that makes him look smart as he completely ignores the evidence. His question, "Who made God?" is as pathetic as he is. So in his way of useless thinking, if a supernatural creator created the natural realm, then that supernatural creator who created the natural realm with its natural laws has then become also bound by those natural laws the supernatural creator created. So explain why a supernatural creator is also bound by the laws the supernatural creator created. Or, show how smart you are and just give your science for creation happening naturally, and don't forget to give your science how the natural laws were created, too. If he wanted to act smart, it may be a good idea to actually show you are. Sagan lived his empty life clueless and has clueless followers.
@2fast2block hey pathetic troll, there is no God, Bible was written by some clueless person like you, stop spamming the real truth you troll, nobody cares what you write
@@reymisterio1386 wow, I need to inform loser you that you gave nothing to prove me wrong. All you did is show what a loser you are ignoring what I wrote. It's your loser life going nowhere but doom.
@2fast2block I don't need to prove you anything, I don't argue with ignorant trolls, go pray to your God to see if it can do a miracle and make you a bit smarter
Living in Shanghai, experienced one lockdown and very like a second coming, feeling the unusual heat that has never occurred to this beloved city, got hurt and manipulated by someone important and finally manage to get out of the control, my tears are just shedding like waterfall watching this video
I miss him terribly. Mr. Sagan, you will always hail in my life as the greatest Astronomer /Physicist to have ever lived. I am honored that you were here in my life time. Every time I hear "The Pale Blue Dot", I am brought to tears, because I have a comprehension of how important and special our little blue dot is, at the same time realizing how much humanity in it's present state of evolution takes it all and each other for granted. I so wish everyone could have such a realization of exactly who and what we are, what our planet is, within this vastness. If so, then Humanity would finally breach the final hurtle of becoming ...turly humanized. Realization and intellect would finally reign over what is left of our animalistic brain stem nature. Next to the Universe its self, you stood as my inspiration. May you be enjoying your afterlife, and enjoying the universe in unparalleled splendor.
@@2fast2blockSagan never made any such claim. As a scientist, he could only speculate as to how all of this came about. In that sense, I suppose, he was as clueless as the rest of us. Whereas you’re just a meanspirited, ignorant troll.
This simple speech should be listened to by every single human being. No matter who you are, where youre from, what you think, or any of that crap, if youre human this should speak to you.
Years ago I purchased the poster of Pale Blue Dot and had it professionally framed and it is always in view at home as a reminder to me what a powerful photo this is! Not a day goes by that I don't miss Carl Sagan!
😢 my all time favourite UA-cam video, lump in throat everytime, maybe one day we will all come together as 1 people and look out together, and go forward together, stop killing each other, stop hating each other, alas not in my lifetime 🌏🌏🌏🌏🌏🌏
@@reynardcole2043 "I take it you believe in some god sitting on a cloud" You take it because you make things up with no proof just like your empty Carl did. For laughs though, copy and paste where I said that. You came about by mere accidents with no proof then claim to know morals. Carl Sagan "The Cosmos is all that is or was or ever will be." Carl Sagan, "I can’t imagine anyone denying the existence of the laws of nature, but I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." More from the clueless Carl, --It’s perfectly possible that the universe is infinitely old and therefore uncaused. In fact, there are detailed cosmological models that hold such a view and that are consistent with everything we know. To my mind, it seems not fully satisfactory to say that there was a first cause. That seems to postpone dealing with the problem rather than solving it. If we say “God” made the universe, then surely the next question is, “Who made God?” If we say “God” was always here, why not say the universe was always here? If we say that the question “Where did God come from?” is too tough for us poor mortals to understand, then why not say that the question of, “Where did the universe come from?” is too tough for us mortals? In what way, exactly, does the God hypothesis advance our knowledge of cosmology? What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?"-- from: www.uscatholic.org/articles/202001/god-and-carl-sagan-cosmos-big-enough-both-them-31939 Read the article. Have a laugh for what a hypocritical, lying, mocking, disgusting, person he was. Carl cannot get around these laws and what they lead to... Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. ....yet he thinks creation happened naturally, "What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?" He ignores the CLEAR science that creation had to happen by God supernaturally! Still, he ignores the laws... "I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." Notice his mocking God, "man in the sky" as if that makes him look smart as he completely ignores the evidence. His question, "Who made God?" is as pathetic as he is. So in his way of useless thinking, if a supernatural creator created the natural realm, then that supernatural creator who created the natural realm with its natural laws has then become also bound by those natural laws the supernatural creator created. So explain why a supernatural creator is also bound by the laws the supernatural creator created. Or, show how smart you are and just give your science for creation happening naturally, and don't forget to give your science how the natural laws were created, too. If he wanted to act smart, it may be a good idea to actually show you are. Sagan lived his empty life clueless and has clueless followers.
Beautifully made & a MUST BE WATCHED by everyone. Must be shown in every School, every village, town, city, club, office,industry, institute... It should be translated to all languages & be part of the learning for every human being on the planet.
I wouldn't say it's science's failure, because it's not exactly science's job. It's every human's job. We can all be kinder to one another, all inspire each other with the love we give each other to be better people. All it takes is one brave person to inspire the people around them to bravery, and I believe all of us can be that brave.
Dumb words from a fool, Carl. Carl Sagan "The Cosmos is all that is or was or ever will be." Carl Sagan, "I can’t imagine anyone denying the existence of the laws of nature, but I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." More from the dumbass, "It’s perfectly possible that the universe is infinitely old and therefore uncaused. In fact, there are detailed cosmological models that hold such a view and that are consistent with everything we know. To my mind, it seems not fully satisfactory to say that there was a first cause. That seems to postpone dealing with the problem rather than solving it. If we say “God” made the universe, then surely the next question is, “Who made God?” If we say “God” was always here, why not say the universe was always here? If we say that the question “Where did God come from?” is too tough for us poor mortals to understand, then why not say that the question of, “Where did the universe come from?” is too tough for us mortals? In what way, exactly, does the God hypothesis advance our knowledge of cosmology? What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?" from: www.uscatholic.org/articles/202001/god-and-carl-sagan-cosmos-big-enough-both-them-31939 Read the article. Have a vomit bag or trash can nearby for what a hypocritical, lying, mocking, disgusting, foolish person he was. Now, Carl the dumbass NEVER can get around these laws and what the lead to... Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. ....yet the buffoon thinks creation happened naturally, but the idiot says, "What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?" as the crap-for-brains ignores the CLEAR science that creation had to happen by God supernaturally! Still the fool who ignores the laws farted out, "I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." Notice his mocking God, "man in the sky" as if that makes him look smart as he completely ignores the evidence. His question, "Who made God?" is as dumb as he is. So in his way of foolish thinking, if a supernatural creator created the natural realm, then that supernatural creator who created the natural realm with its natural laws has then become also bound by those natural laws the supernatural creator created. So explain why a supernatural creator is also bound by the laws the supernatural creator created. Or, show how smart you are and just give your science for creation happening naturally and don't forget to give your science how the natural laws were created, too. If he wanted to act smart, it may be a good idea to actually show you are. Sagan the dumbass will at some point face his Maker for his judgment of what he believed in this life. His extreme shame and regret was all his choice. He wanted to be a hypocritical dumbass. Then he'll be thrown into the lake of fire. It will be his 'The End' and be remembered no more. ALL his choice and for others who follow that fool.
"Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors so that in glory and in triumph they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot" This is very relevant today as Russia invades Ukraine.
I remember watching this, it changed my perspective on man kind. Funny how mankind knew this thousands of years ago, to protect our mother, earth. And we call ourselves advanced, while we destroy our home.
Carl's science is as poetic as a fart. Carl Sagan "The Cosmos is all that is or was or ever will be." Carl Sagan, "I can’t imagine anyone denying the existence of the laws of nature, but I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." More from the dumbass, "It’s perfectly possible that the universe is infinitely old and therefore uncaused. In fact, there are detailed cosmological models that hold such a view and that are consistent with everything we know. To my mind, it seems not fully satisfactory to say that there was a first cause. That seems to postpone dealing with the problem rather than solving it. If we say “God” made the universe, then surely the next question is, “Who made God?” If we say “God” was always here, why not say the universe was always here? If we say that the question “Where did God come from?” is too tough for us poor mortals to understand, then why not say that the question of, “Where did the universe come from?” is too tough for us mortals? In what way, exactly, does the God hypothesis advance our knowledge of cosmology? What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?" from: www.uscatholic.org/articles/202001/god-and-carl-sagan-cosmos-big-enough-both-them-31939 Read the article. Have a vomit bag or trash can nearby for what a hypocritical, lying, mocking, disgusting, foolish person he was. Now, Carl the dumbass NEVER can get around these laws and what the lead to... Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. ....yet the buffoon thinks creation happened naturally, but the idiot says, "What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?" as the crap-for-brains ignores the CLEAR science that creation had to happen by God supernaturally! Still the fool who ignores the laws farted out, "I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." Notice his mocking God, "man in the sky" as if that makes him look smart as he completely ignores the evidence. His question, "Who made God?" is as dumb as he is. So in his way of foolish thinking, if a supernatural creator created the natural realm, then that supernatural creator who created the natural realm with its natural laws has then become also bound by those natural laws the supernatural creator created. So explain why a supernatural creator is also bound by the laws the supernatural creator created. Or, show how smart you are and just give your science for creation happening naturally and don't forget to give your science how the natural laws were created, too. If he wanted to act smart, it may be a good idea to actually show you are. Sagan the dumbass will at some point face his Maker for his judgment of what he believed in this life. His extreme shame and regret was all his choice. He wanted to be a hypocritical dumbass. Then he'll be thrown into the lake of fire. It will be his 'The End' and be remembered no more. ALL his choice and for others who follow that fool.
The only thing that's close to a fart is your narrow mind, thinking you and your god know it all. No one has the answer to who created this world we live in, not me, not you, not sagan and not your god, we just assume things based on our perceptions of the world. Accept the fact that you just simply don't know. You don't know whether your god is real, you just assume it is because everyone says so... believe those "preachers", "chosen servants of god" or "those who have felt god", really ? I might as well had my ass itching yesterday, maybe I felt god and I didn't know... you people are so gullible and all this religion is bullshit, every religion. thousands of years we as a race we believed in gods, trying to justify the good and evil that's happening in the world with fairy tales. It's the 21st century, just fucking get over it already.
@@LikeAGroove oh boy, let's see the science you have to counter mine.... "No one has the answer to who created this world we live in, not me, not you, not sagan and not your god, we just assume things based on our perceptions of the world." Can you have someone in grade school that CAN read what I said to you? I did put science that we KNOW. Once they read it to you then don't go into pussy rubbing mode, actually give science, not word farts. The rest was typical pussy rubbing word farting fill-ins with NO science to prove me wrong. You're such an imbecile you thought it wouldn't be noticed. Sorry, the ignoramus in your shines brightly. No hiding it.
@@2fast2block I don't think it's right to offend him because you have another opinion. I don't think he called anyone who believes in god or anything else a "dumbass". Of course you can have your own view and opinion, but then say it in a decent way please. How dare you saying things like that just because someone is not sharing your opinion? Somebody who REALLY cares wouldn't go out there and scream around "y'all are fucking ignorant pussies because you .....(don't share my opinion)", right??? Who do you think you are, talking to people like that? It's people like you who are offending others intentionally and on their own initiative! If someone tries to hurt you, defend yourself (or others, of course!), but let the people live their lives just as you want them to let you live yours. And by the way: how are you so sure about being right? Hear me out... me for example... personally, i don't "believe" that there is a god. But i'd never say that i know there isn't. Because i just CAN'T be sure about it. Just as you can't know that there is one. We are humans. We can see, smell, taste, feel and hear. But wait - doesn't it all only happen in our brains? Everything we see...how can we be sure that in reality it looks exactly the way we see it? We can't. Theoretically, everything (EVERYTHING) we have ever seen, heard, etc. could also not be true (or not the only truth). I'm not saying that it isn't, but i'm saying that it's possible. Because everything is possible. We with our modest 5 senses... how can we be sure? We can't. Maybe there IS a god. I cannot know. In my opinion, humans can rely on science the most, because it's based on facts that could have been observed by us, by our modest 5 senses. There are many things that cannot be observed by our senses, although we're still pretty convinced they exist (microwaves for example.. electrons... protons... quarks... oof there are so many), but they could have been proven with logical thinking which we have developed throughout the years (based on the natural laws which we experience every day). And i have another quick question: how are you sure that it's your "religion" which is right? There are numerous religions and some of them are probably also similar to yours, so how do you know that it's you and only you who is right? As i said, i'm not sure that there isn't a god. All of it is possible. I think one shouldn't think that his opinion is the only right one. I think that people should be more open to other points of view.
He was just a fool. Carl Sagan "The Cosmos is all that is or was or ever will be." Carl Sagan, "I can’t imagine anyone denying the existence of the laws of nature, but I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." More from the dumbass, "It’s perfectly possible that the universe is infinitely old and therefore uncaused. In fact, there are detailed cosmological models that hold such a view and that are consistent with everything we know. To my mind, it seems not fully satisfactory to say that there was a first cause. That seems to postpone dealing with the problem rather than solving it. If we say “God” made the universe, then surely the next question is, “Who made God?” If we say “God” was always here, why not say the universe was always here? If we say that the question “Where did God come from?” is too tough for us poor mortals to understand, then why not say that the question of, “Where did the universe come from?” is too tough for us mortals? In what way, exactly, does the God hypothesis advance our knowledge of cosmology? What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?" from: www.uscatholic.org/articles/202001/god-and-carl-sagan-cosmos-big-enough-both-them-31939 Read the article. Have a vomit bag or trash can nearby for what a hypocritical, lying, mocking, disgusting, foolish person he was. Now, Carl the dumbass NEVER can get around these laws and what the lead to... Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. ....yet the buffoon thinks creation happened naturally, but the idiot says, "What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?" as the crap-for-brains ignores the CLEAR science that creation had to happen by God supernaturally! Still the fool who ignores the laws farted out, "I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." Notice his mocking God, "man in the sky" as if that makes him look smart as he completely ignores the evidence. His question, "Who made God?" is as dumb as he is. So in his way of foolish thinking, if a supernatural creator created the natural realm, then that supernatural creator who created the natural realm with its natural laws has then become also bound by those natural laws the supernatural creator created. So explain why a supernatural creator is also bound by the laws the supernatural creator created. Or, show how smart you are and just give your science for creation happening naturally and don't forget to give your science how the natural laws were created, too. If he wanted to act smart, it may be a good idea to actually show you are. Sagan the dumbass will at some point face his Maker for his judgment of what he believed in this life. His extreme shame and regret was all his choice. He wanted to be a hypocritical dumbass. Then he'll be thrown into the lake of fire. It will be his 'The End' and be remembered no more. ALL his choice and for others who follow that fool.
This should be a mandatory movie for every student of primary school. This alone would make our world a better place.
Unfortunately it's copyrighted. Somebody wants to make money out of it. That's official.
Living Legend I am doing this for my homework...
Education is already mandatory and quite frankly I think Sagan would agree with Asimov:
"There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there always has been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that "my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge."
it should be daily viewing for all politicians and executives.
Looking this up to show my classroom of learners on the first day of school.
I was in a miserable mood today , so I decided to use the strongest antidote against petty anger and superficial worries : the soothing voice and the wisdom of Carl Sagan. Always works. Thank you, Carl!
Excatly what happend to me today. ^^
Well, I think it's more of his ability to make you realize you ain't shit that helps.
Same here mate
CottonCatt
Same. It always helps to remember we aren’t alone and we are all in this together.
The first time I heard this Carl Sagan's words I felt so overwhelmed that I couldn't stop crying. Even now, years later and just a day after the 2024 Solar eclipse, I still come looking for this just to remind me that my problems are so small, that we are so insignificant and so important at the same time.
I watched COSMOS in 1980. I have watched it many times. It changed my life. Carl left us way too early.
Same here. The pale blue dot hangs in my home office. It changed the way I look at life. It put things into perspective We are so small.
Be humble for you are made of earth, be noble for you are made of stars
Jason P great quote man 👏
Jason P nom. Xml
I've read that that's a Serbian proverb, but do you happen to know anything more about it? How old is it? What was the original context? And how literally was it meant? I'd love to know, but haven't been able to find any more on it.
If it is in fact ancient it is remarkable for its literal accuracy.
Pretty sure it's just from a song by Moby.
One of the best speeches ever.
I don't know the message to mars is pretty bad ass too.
One of the greatest's minds ever
The best speech ever
Nothing else puts us in perspective. Amazing speech.
poem
I cry nearly every time I listen to this. It is so beautiful to think about. As a victim of long term abuse, it reminds me not to lash out in return. But instead to open my arms to as many people I can. Let's try to preserve this Pale Blue Dot... and each other.
Dear Jim, Please know that your impact on everyone you meet is profound. You are seen. And your life is NOT defined by those who are unkind to you. I wish you well! Greetings from London: the sun is struggling, and there is a slight chill in the air. Spring is trying! 👋🏼
Thank you for opening your arms in defiant compassion and inspiring others to do the same ❤
More power to kind souls like you, pal !
May you leave an indelible ever glowing mark on the pages of history of this pale blue dot❤
🇺🇸🇺🇸
Hand in there Jim.
There are many people like you who love Sagan, the cosmos, and who are thinking of you 💪✊
Carl Sagan was as much a philosopher as he was a tireless advocate for science. What an amazing human.
Every time there is a conflict or war, I come watch this video to remind myself how insignificant we all are. We need more people like Carl Sagan.
It really hits hard when you see children dying and Palestine just becoming a graveyard and nobody is even trying to help them at all. 😞
And Christopher Hitchens.
@@chocomoon9022 i wish this leaders set aside their difference in just agree on a peace deal. sadly their greediness prolong this war even more
@@chocomoon9022there's even more dying in Afghanistan, Egypt and Yemen and Iran , while Palestine isn't a country nor any significant philosophers or musicians
@@MusicismoreImportant So people dying is just a contest for you? Innocent folks being killed in Palestine are also people.
Exactly 33 years ago today this iconic image was captured by camera on Voyager 1 on 14/02/1990. God bless Carl Sagan
It is a crime that this only has 1 million views. It deserves to be seen by every human being, living on this pale blue dot.
True!!!
Aint that the truth
💯
So true, just shows how spiritually underdeveloped our species is
Agree
"So that in glory and triumph they could become the momentary masters of fraction of a dot"
"Like it or not, the earth is where we make our stand."
i get goose bumps every time i hear that sentence.
Sam Munir that me
The BEST part.
It's so true. Why fight for this spec of dust when it means nothing
This should be translated in every spoken language.
There is a Brazilian portuguese version here on UA-cam by Guilherme Briggs, the same guys who dubbed Buzz Lightyear in Toy Story... You can imagine how heavy it is
I guess, Sagan’s book has been translated into many and many languages. But a lot of people still just did not read it :(
There is malayalam also
@@MalluBeefboy link tha bro
Maybe if you can translate it in to your own language here or elsewhere, that may help get this more world wide attention.
Brings me to tears every time
Some find notions like this alarming. I find it absolutely beautiful and divine.
A well tough out mix of humility, wonder, history and wisdom.
Me too
I was just asking myself, "why am I crying?", then I saw your comment
me too
Every time I hear this my eyes water and a lump forms in my throat. Yet I still come back to it time and again to remind myself of why it's so important not to forget.
Ditto
I had a very dear friend that used to go to sleep every night on the couch listening to an episode of Cosmos.. :)
Please don't lose it. Don't let that part of yourself wither away. We need it, now more than ever.
Dido
@@2fast2block Stfu bitch, God is merely a imagination of human.
I will forever love Dr. Sagan and miss his distinctive and inspiring voice.
Dang. We're not much. THIS is all we've got.
If there was ever a time to wish him back into the universe... This would be a nice time.
There are two lines in particular that really stand out for me.
1. Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors so that, in glory and triumph, they could become the momentary masters of a fraction, of a dot.
2. There is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image.
Thank you Carl for being such an inspiration.
No sermon or motivational speech comes close to this. Thank you Carl for being such a big influence in my life.
great !!
Mine too.
Carl Sagan "The Cosmos is all that is or was or ever will be."
Carl Sagan, "I can’t imagine anyone denying the existence of the laws of nature, but I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky."
More from the dumbass, "It’s perfectly possible that the universe is infinitely old and therefore uncaused. In fact, there are detailed cosmological models that hold such a view and that are consistent with everything we know. To my mind, it seems not fully satisfactory to say that there was a first cause. That seems to postpone dealing with the problem rather than solving it. If we say “God” made the universe, then surely the next question is, “Who made God?” If we say “God” was always here, why not say the universe was always here? If we say that the question “Where did God come from?” is too tough for us poor mortals to understand, then why not say that the question of, “Where did the universe come from?” is too tough for us mortals? In what way, exactly, does the God hypothesis advance our knowledge of cosmology? What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?"
from: www.uscatholic.org/articles/202001/god-and-carl-sagan-cosmos-big-enough-both-them-31939
Read the article. Have a vomit bag or trash can nearby for what a hypocritical, lying, mocking, disgusting, foolish person he was.
Now, Carl the dumbass NEVER can get around these laws and what the lead to...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
....yet the buffoon thinks creation happened naturally, but the idiot says, "What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?" as the crap-for-brains ignores the CLEAR science that creation had to happen by God supernaturally! Still the fool who ignores the laws farted out, "I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." Notice his mocking God, "man in the sky" as if that makes him look smart as he completely ignores the evidence.
His question, "Who made God?" is as dumb as he is.
So in his way of foolish thinking, if a supernatural creator created the natural realm, then that supernatural creator who created the natural realm with its natural laws has then become also bound by those natural laws the supernatural creator created. So explain why a supernatural creator is also bound by the laws the supernatural creator created. Or, show how smart you are and just give your science for creation happening naturally and don't forget to give your science how the natural laws were created, too. If he wanted to act smart, it may be a good idea to actually show you are.
Sagan the dumbass will at some point face his Maker for his judgment of what he believed in this life. His extreme shame and regret was all his choice. He wanted to be a hypocritical dumbass. Then he'll be thrown into the lake of fire. It will be his 'The End' and be remembered no more. ALL his choice and for others who follow that fool.
@@2fast2block Interesting how having an agnostic stance to an unprovable supposition makes someone who has contributed so much to humanity a "dumbass" in the eyes of someone who probably wouldn't want anyone to even know how tenuous their own record of accomplishments are. Instead of being pompous on the internet, or insulting dead men, why not contribute to society? Do good in the now.
@@Lasair517 waste of life and resources, I gave science and you give flatulence. You just prove you can't get around what I wrote. Stop playing with yourself and actually prove me wrong. Look at a wuss you are unable to give science how creation happened naturally. Just keep rubbing yourself since it's all you know what to do when asked to show something.
To say that this has had a significant impact on my life would be a severe understatement. I wish that I had found this speech when I was just a young child, but I am glad that I did find it at 18. This was the greatest way to readjust my perspective on life during 2020 when the world went through a pandemic. I know to never stop savoring every moment on this planet and I hope to follow in Carl Sagan's footsteps and study astrophysics myself.
Do it man, I started an astrophysics degree at 27, you're never too old and it's never too late. Chase your dreams, we get but one chance at this journey atop our blue marble, make the most of it and chase what you love
@@thebeardedastronomer thank you for writing this, it's very encouraging for me. I'm 27 and there's quite a road ahead of me to get to the position of being able to study astrophysics, but I won't give up.
Update. Benjamin has since got laid and now lives in carnal bliss in a hippy commune getting wrecked on mdma
Benjamin. ..it was a PLANdemic..Event 201 of the UN. Wake up! Planned destruction, of us, the humans! They use air, water, pharma, soil, entertainment, info...all poisoned
I'm being censored right now! !!
@@hmq9052
Bloody warker, you really do kill a buzz of intellectualism.
This needs to be required listening for any human being.
That's so true. Astronomy exercises humility in our hearts!
Thanks mr robot man
This is garbage is all it is.
Carl Sagan "The Cosmos is all that is or was or ever will be."
Carl Sagan, "I can’t imagine anyone denying the existence of the laws of nature, but I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky."
More from the dumbass, "It’s perfectly possible that the universe is infinitely old and therefore uncaused. In fact, there are detailed cosmological models that hold such a view and that are consistent with everything we know. To my mind, it seems not fully satisfactory to say that there was a first cause. That seems to postpone dealing with the problem rather than solving it. If we say “God” made the universe, then surely the next question is, “Who made God?” If we say “God” was always here, why not say the universe was always here? If we say that the question “Where did God come from?” is too tough for us poor mortals to understand, then why not say that the question of, “Where did the universe come from?” is too tough for us mortals? In what way, exactly, does the God hypothesis advance our knowledge of cosmology? What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?"
from: www.uscatholic.org/articles/202001/god-and-carl-sagan-cosmos-big-enough-both-them-31939
Read the article. Have a vomit bag or trash can nearby for what a hypocritical, lying, mocking, disgusting, foolish person he was.
Now, Carl the dumbass NEVER can get around these laws and what the lead to...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
....yet the buffoon thinks creation happened naturally, but the idiot says, "What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?" as the crap-for-brains ignores the CLEAR science that creation had to happen by God supernaturally! Still the fool who ignores the laws farted out, "I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." Notice his mocking God, "man in the sky" as if that makes him look smart as he completely ignores the evidence.
His question, "Who made God?" is as dumb as he is.
So in his way of foolish thinking, if a supernatural creator created the natural realm, then that supernatural creator who created the natural realm with its natural laws has then become also bound by those natural laws the supernatural creator created. So explain why a supernatural creator is also bound by the laws the supernatural creator created. Or, show how smart you are and just give your science for creation happening naturally and don't forget to give your science how the natural laws were created, too. If he wanted to act smart, it may be a good idea to actually show you are.
Sagan the dumbass will at some point face his Maker for his judgment of what he believed in this life. His extreme shame and regret was all his choice. He wanted to be a hypocritical dumbass. Then he'll be thrown into the lake of fire. It will be his 'The End' and be remembered no more. ALL his choice and for others who follow that fool.
@@2fast2block I’ve seen you on other youtube videos, and you’ve said nearly the exact same thing every time. How sad and lonely do you have to be to come to every UA-cam video dedicated to Carl Sagan and say something as horrible as that. Get a life mate, don’t waste it saying all of this rubbish.
@@2fast2block how funny, you spent maybe an hour on your dumbass hate reaction, and not even one like... loser!
@@babyyoda9943 that was sure a gassy reply that never addressed what I wrote to prove it wrong. I'm sure you have more gas to let out that is clueless.
I remember when I had first watched this.
I and my class were watching this and the teacher had given us no indication that this speech was coming.
As this was played in front of us, all of us sat still, mesmerized. After the episode finished, all I remember hearing was the projector's quite hum and seeing the wonder on my classmates' faces.
I truly hope that every person and especially children get to experience this fantastic documentary series once. It transformed my life and given the opportunity, will do the same for many more people.
Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. Nо оne cоmes tо the Father except thrоugh me. John 14:6 ⭐✝
@@Andrew-Johnson With the greatest of respect, take your fairytales and stick them up your butt. You don't deserve to watch such brilliance as this.
@@Andrew-JohnsonI don’t care what claims your Jesus made about his divinity. What matters to those of us who don’t turn to religious texts is the wisdom that will allow us to better live with each other. Christ actually had words worth pondering on that subject, but in my opinion, none of them were better than these.
Carl Sagan's speeches always gives me goose bumps. He mixes science with human emotions, rather than leaving it as dry, robotic knowledge.
I watch this when I'm feeling horribly sad. Went through a hard breakup, and I watch this on repeat to help reset and center myself, just to see how tiny this moment is, in this vast universe.
I am sorry about your breakup. Those hurt. Carl was clueless though in thinking this all came about on its own with NO proof. I turn to God that has all the proof.
@@2fast2blockFine, as Sagan would have been the first to tell you. If your religion works for you, then by all means embrace it. Many of us are not obligated to feel the same way, however. Not yet, anyway.
@@michaelhall2709 Carl the liar couldn't even get past BASIC science. The 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, energy can only change forms, energy creation/destruction can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. Creation had to be done supernaturally at some point.
Science deals with what can be observed. The supernatural cannot be observed or measured. It is an assertion! You say “it had to be done supernaturally”. What else could it be, right? That’s an argument from ignorance, it’s a logical fallacy.
Look again at that dot. That's here. That's home. That's us. On it everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives. The aggregate of our joy and suffering, thousands of confident religions, ideologies, and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilization, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every mother and father, hopeful child, inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every "superstar," every "supreme leader," every saint and sinner in the history of our species lived there--on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam.
The Earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena. Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors so that, in glory and triumph, they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot. Think of the endless cruelties visited by the inhabitants of one corner of this pixel on the scarcely distinguishable inhabitants of some other corner, how frequent their misunderstandings, how eager they are to kill one another, how fervent their hatreds.
Our posturings, our imagined self-importance, the delusion that we have some privileged position in the Universe, are challenged by this point of pale light. Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark. In our obscurity, in all this vastness, there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves.
The Earth is the only world known so far to harbor life. There is nowhere else, at least in the near future, to which our species could migrate. Visit, yes. Settle, not yet. Like it or not, for the moment the Earth is where we make our stand.
It has been said that astronomy is a humbling and character-building experience. There is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world. To me, it underscores our responsibility to deal more kindly with one another, and to preserve and cherish the pale blue dot, the only home we've ever known.
-- Carl Sagan, Pale Blue Dot, 1994
Carl Sagan "The Cosmos is all that is or was or ever will be."
Carl Sagan, "I can’t imagine anyone denying the existence of the laws of nature, but I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky."
More from the dumbass, "It’s perfectly possible that the universe is infinitely old and therefore uncaused. In fact, there are detailed cosmological models that hold such a view and that are consistent with everything we know. To my mind, it seems not fully satisfactory to say that there was a first cause. That seems to postpone dealing with the problem rather than solving it. If we say “God” made the universe, then surely the next question is, “Who made God?” If we say “God” was always here, why not say the universe was always here? If we say that the question “Where did God come from?” is too tough for us poor mortals to understand, then why not say that the question of, “Where did the universe come from?” is too tough for us mortals? In what way, exactly, does the God hypothesis advance our knowledge of cosmology? What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?"
from: www.uscatholic.org/articles/202001/god-and-carl-sagan-cosmos-big-enough-both-them-31939
Read the article. Have a vomit bag or trash can nearby for what a hypocritical, lying, mocking, disgusting, foolish person he was.
Now, Carl the dumbass NEVER can get around these laws and what the lead to...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
....yet the buffoon thinks creation happened naturally, but the idiot says, "What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?" as the crap-for-brains ignores the CLEAR science that creation had to happen by God supernaturally! Still the fool who ignores the laws farted out, "I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." Notice his mocking God, "man in the sky" as if that makes him look smart as he completely ignores the evidence.
His question, "Who made God?" is as dumb as he is.
So in his way of foolish thinking, if a supernatural creator created the natural realm, then that supernatural creator who created the natural realm with its natural laws has then become also bound by those natural laws the supernatural creator created. So explain why a supernatural creator is also bound by the laws the supernatural creator created. Or, show how smart you are and just give your science for creation happening naturally and don't forget to give your science how the natural laws were created, too. If he wanted to act smart, it may be a good idea to actually show you are.
Sagan the dumbass will at some point face his Maker for his judgment of what he believed in this life. His extreme shame and regret was all his choice. He wanted to be a hypocritical dumbass. Then he'll be thrown into the lake of fire. It will be his 'The End' and be remembered no more. ALL his choice and for others who follow that fool.
@@2fast2block good quotes form Carl Sagan. he truly was brilliant and one of the best teachers weve had in our lifetimes. u know he had like 30 honorary doctorates. if you dont agree with most of the things he teaches, then you dont agree with the last 400 years of the brightest minds on the planet working together to try to figure out whats true about the world. u dont agree with science. its the very arrogance he speaks of. how could you possibly understand more about the universe and its creation than the smartest people of the last 400 yearsall working together.
@@2fast2block I’m assuming your basing your opinion on a religious ideology. “Lake of fire” quote just because you don’t agree with someone based on their beliefs system, doesn’t mean you’re right to mock and belittle someone. The fact is, that we mere humans don’t know if we were created by a spiritual being or we just evolved, the fact is that we don’t truly know. There’s a possibility that a creator of some sort created humanity, earth, and all living things. Yet we live in a vastly imperfect world with many unanswered questions. We didn’t come from nothing, we came from something. What that is exactLy? I don’t know but there’s something magical devine and possibly spiritual wether that’s called a god, a spirit, an alien, or science we evolve and this world 🌎 is just too perfectly created for us humans to survive in it. Yes religions don’t have all the answers, all religions have been created by mankind our of a need to be connected with something higher than ourselves. I choose not believe in religion, but I choose not to deny the possibility of something higher than ourselves. Maybe we’re all godly beings living in a world experience, who knows but there’s something far greater than our own understanding that has to exist simply because it’ll be illogical to think otherwise
@@DeuceGenius like all you losers, you ignore what I wrote because it proves you wrong. Come on, get around the science I gave, but you can't.
@@chgofirefighter you are a loser who just makes up things and refuses to look at what was put in front of empty you.
"The fact is, that we mere humans don’t know if we were created by a spiritual being or we just evolved, the fact is that we don’t truly know."
I gave laws of science that prove what we KNOW and the universe had to be created supernaturally. What in your excess bowel gas reply did you give that gave reason to doubt those laws? Oh, you couldn't give any. Losers like you pay no attention to that since it's easy to ignore reality so you can be the misfits you love to be.
Imagine if everyone, especially people in power, held this cosmic perspective of our place in the universe. Surely, our problems would shrink, and the world would be a much better place.
This should be at the beginning of every single News Program
Carl Sagan was quite possibly the worlds greatest science communicator!
this is, in my opinion, the best and more important message that humanity have ever said, and said it to its own. But only a few have heard and undestood... RIP Carl.
Carl's message ranks at the top of my list as the most succinct and eloquent sermon for humans ever delivered. This is also a poem - a poem that pleads to every heart and mind that occupies the pale blue dot.
it’s hollow bs
This is by far the best visualization made for that fragment of the book. Even though I prefer the audio quality of the original recording (it's kind of softer), this cleaned-up version suits this video better.
I love the first four chapters of the book (printed or audio), which I think could stand alone as a treatise on our place in the universe. Humbling in the perspective it shows us, but it ends up inspiring us to go on to greater things.
To me this sounds like a newer recording, not just cleaned up. I really love the first one, especially with Vangelis music, everything falls to place with it in such a natural way
Whoever convinced him to narrate this book should get an award. Posthumously if they aren't still with us.
His other books are fine works, but his narration... it rises to high art at times.
Convinced him (Sagan)? Um...he wrote it, so only it's natural that he would do the narration.
@@truthserum5202 He wrote several books, and this is the only one he narrated. Authors rarely narrate their own books, and usually that's a good thing.
Thank you so much for this video. Every time I feel scared or uncomfortable, I watch this, and it makes everything better. I love you all, fellow Earthlings!
Me too Kunai, well said mate
@MrGuvnah then please leave this comment section and perhabs our planet
Love you too 343 Guilty Spark 🙂😂
Yes, go to sleep and think of clueless Carl and his lies. How nice.
Carl Sagan "The Cosmos is all that is or was or ever will be."
Carl Sagan, "I can’t imagine anyone denying the existence of the laws of nature, but I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky."
More from the clueless Carl, --It’s perfectly possible that the universe is infinitely old and therefore uncaused. In fact, there are detailed cosmological models that hold such a view and that are consistent with everything we know. To my mind, it seems not fully satisfactory to say that there was a first cause. That seems to postpone dealing with the problem rather than solving it. If we say “God” made the universe, then surely the next question is, “Who made God?” If we say “God” was always here, why not say the universe was always here? If we say that the question “Where did God come from?” is too tough for us poor mortals to understand, then why not say that the question of, “Where did the universe come from?” is too tough for us mortals? In what way, exactly, does the God hypothesis advance our knowledge of cosmology? What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?"--
from: www.uscatholic.org/articles/202001/god-and-carl-sagan-cosmos-big-enough-both-them-31939
Read the article. Have a laugh for what a hypocritical, lying, mocking, disgusting, person he was.
Carl cannot get around these laws and what they lead to...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
....yet he thinks creation happened naturally, "What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?"
He ignores the CLEAR science that creation had to happen by God supernaturally! Still, he ignores the laws...
"I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." Notice his mocking God, "man in the sky" as if that makes him look smart as he completely ignores the evidence.
His question, "Who made God?" is as pathetic as he is.
So in his way of useless thinking, if a supernatural creator created the natural realm, then that supernatural creator who created the natural realm with its natural laws has then become also bound by those natural laws the supernatural creator created. So explain why a supernatural creator is also bound by the laws the supernatural creator created. Or, show how smart you are and just give your science for creation happening naturally, and don't forget to give your science how the natural laws were created, too. If he wanted to act smart, it may be a good idea to actually show you are.
Sagan lived his empty life clueless and has clueless followers.
@@2fast2block Sounds like Carl Sagan was 100% correct and you're stuck in the Stone Age.
Get with the times, kid. Humanity is leaving religion and seeing it for the lie it is.
Your "god" is simply a pastiche of other pagan faiths thrown together. Jesus, Mithras, Horus all VERY similar stories. Too similar.
We are all we have, all we ever will have, and there is no afterlife, nor a return to this one. Science has proven this.
Think on that. You are wrong, and your pastors LIED TO YOU.
No replies will be seen or read.
You have been told.
I’ve heard these words for years and they still fill my eyes with tears. I wish we grew as a species and recognized our Lilliputian place in the cosmos.
Yeah, how nice of clueless Carl lying that this all came about on its own with no proof it did.
@@2fast2blockHe never made any such claim at all. You’re the one who’s lying. Isn’t there a commandment about that?
I miss two people so very much.
Fred Rogers
Carl Sagan
They are both sorely needed right now.
And Bob Ross, and Sherri Lewis. I totally agree. We need them all right now.
Steve Irwin.
Nice as it would be, more importantly is that we need more people to follow in their footsteps and carry on what they started. We can't get them back, but we can strive to follow their examples and each strive to leave the world a little better place than it was when we arrived.
The problem is those who most need to listen to, and follow the examples of, those men will never do either. It is a cripplingly sad reality that, for many of us, our ideologies have become so entrenched, so a part of our very existences, that we cannot see past them any more than we can see past a brick wall. And, we would literally rather die before we'd ever compromise on our precious ideologies.
What would that accomplish 🙄
Who is rewatching in 2020 during the pandemic
@@2fast2block no one asked
@@2fast2block good work - very well presented - arguments slightly weak (absurd), difficult to understand (idiotic), poorly constructed - fuck you
@@ayce7286 I don't care, I just love showing what fools Sagan followers are.
@@IanHalsallmusic Ok, "good work - very well presented - arguments slightly weak (absurd), difficult to understand (idiotic), poorly constructed - fuck you"
And your evidence to back what you said up....
(blank)
You're as much as a fool as you are a pathetic wimp.
@Harsh Raval so, to your slow brain, you got around what I wrote with...
"JESUS WAS THE IMPOSTER and his father POS."
Now that you had your orgasm making your useless reply in your pathetic waste of life, do copy and paste the science that was in that word barf that gave us creation naturally and got around the laws I gave. Or, keep being the clown you love to be.
It is a New Year tradition of mine to listen to this.
Perhaps especially poignant in our current times.
Happy New Year everyone. ❤
What a lovely idea! I'll do that too this year end onwards. Thank you, fellow pale blue dot inhabitant. 🙂
@@mysticalanna less than two weeks left for the new year and i'm seeing this comment. Thank you! This is a brilliant idea.
One of the greatest Speeches ever by one of THE GREATEST men that EVER lived!
This should replace national anthems!
So true ❤
Ya
*international
MrGuvnah
Makes me want to replace it more.
Стефан Радев Wrong vid…?
This narration must be recorded in every language in their own accent, so that everyone could understand this deeply 💖🙏 THANKS Carl ❤️
Yes
I consider this to be the greatest speech in human history! Everyone living on Earth should hear and see this and know that self destruction, war and divide is not the answer.
The answer lies in science, united together to build the future together and preserve life on Earth before venturing the uncover the secrets of the cosmos.
One of the most important speeches ever written.
Has the dreamy super-perspective of left handed Sagan.
This is the most beautiful speech I have ever heard. I come back here every now and then, and every time this video brings me to tears.
Oftentimes, when I am feeling the worst about the world, myself, and my place in the world, I return to this video. And always, even if just for a fleeting moment, Carl's words make me feel better.
I've found myself coming back to this video every couple of months for the last several years. I've always seen it as a way to level and remind myself how little small problems truly are. While Sagan passed shortly after I was born, he's helped me grow up with this excerpt alone. Now, I'm using this as a center point for one of my final courses in college. As I approach the end of my journey with this degree, I wonder how I'll influence this 'pale blue dot' around me. If I can make a fraction of an impact like Sagan did during his time on Earth, I'll be a happy man.
Most meaningful words EVER
I grew up under the wisdom of Carl Sagan, and others of his caliber. In other words, I got to grow up, be mentored and inspired by the very finest , profound minds - all having built on the wisdom of past great minds. If you do not see people like this in your children's lives today - seek them out. This planet needs more inspiring.
@@2fast2block calm down there and take your mood stabilizers
@@poopchubbincorporated3901 got it, you have nothing to show I'm wrong so you think this was somehow in some way a good reply that does nothing...
"calm down there and take your mood stabilizers"
You must have thought hard and long on that being what a dingbat you are.
@@2fast2block i never said you're wrong or right, i just said that you're acting like an anger-driven grandpa by pasting textwalls under people's comments who won't ever care enough to read them, and i thought about the mood stabilizers part in 4 seconds, which is probably less than how long it took you to type out that textwall under this comment
@@2fast2block did you not take the mood stabilizers because it looks like all you're capable of doing is insulting others, proven by your entire online presence
@@poopchubbincorporated3901 " it looks like all you're capable of doing is insulting others"
Says the b-itch who rubs themself to 0rgasm ignoring the evidence I gave. Rub away, you waste of life.
I always revert back to this poem when the world seems uncertain. It never fails to give me perspective
Because you're clueless like Carl was.
Carl Sagan "The Cosmos is all that is or was or ever will be."
Carl Sagan, "I can’t imagine anyone denying the existence of the laws of nature, but I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky."
More from the clueless Carl, --It’s perfectly possible that the universe is infinitely old and therefore uncaused. In fact, there are detailed cosmological models that hold such a view and that are consistent with everything we know. To my mind, it seems not fully satisfactory to say that there was a first cause. That seems to postpone dealing with the problem rather than solving it. If we say “God” made the universe, then surely the next question is, “Who made God?” If we say “God” was always here, why not say the universe was always here? If we say that the question “Where did God come from?” is too tough for us poor mortals to understand, then why not say that the question of, “Where did the universe come from?” is too tough for us mortals? In what way, exactly, does the God hypothesis advance our knowledge of cosmology? What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?"--
from: www.uscatholic.org/articles/202001/god-and-carl-sagan-cosmos-big-enough-both-them-31939
Read the article. Have a laugh for what a hypocritical, lying, mocking, disgusting, person he was.
Carl cannot get around these laws and what they lead to...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
....yet he thinks creation happened naturally, "What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?"
He ignores the CLEAR science that creation had to happen by God supernaturally! Still, he ignores the laws...
"I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." Notice his mocking God, "man in the sky" as if that makes him look smart as he completely ignores the evidence.
His question, "Who made God?" is as pathetic as he is.
So in his way of useless thinking, if a supernatural creator created the natural realm, then that supernatural creator who created the natural realm with its natural laws has then become also bound by those natural laws the supernatural creator created. So explain why a supernatural creator is also bound by the laws the supernatural creator created. Or, show how smart you are and just give your science for creation happening naturally, and don't forget to give your science how the natural laws were created, too. If he wanted to act smart, it may be a good idea to actually show you are.
Sagan lived his empty life clueless and has clueless followers.
Every politician should be required to commit this to memory before being eligible to be placed on a ticket.
125 politicians disliked this video
Every politician should jump out of a plane without a parachute...Cheers
yessssssss
Carl Sagan "The Cosmos is all that is or was or ever will be."
Carl Sagan, "I can’t imagine anyone denying the existence of the laws of nature, but I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky."
More from the dumbass, "It’s perfectly possible that the universe is infinitely old and therefore uncaused. In fact, there are detailed cosmological models that hold such a view and that are consistent with everything we know. To my mind, it seems not fully satisfactory to say that there was a first cause. That seems to postpone dealing with the problem rather than solving it. If we say “God” made the universe, then surely the next question is, “Who made God?” If we say “God” was always here, why not say the universe was always here? If we say that the question “Where did God come from?” is too tough for us poor mortals to understand, then why not say that the question of, “Where did the universe come from?” is too tough for us mortals? In what way, exactly, does the God hypothesis advance our knowledge of cosmology? What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?"
from: www.uscatholic.org/articles/202001/god-and-carl-sagan-cosmos-big-enough-both-them-31939
Read the article. Have a vomit bag or trash can nearby for what a hypocritical, lying, mocking, disgusting, foolish person he was.
Now, Carl the dumbass NEVER can get around these laws and what the lead to...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
....yet the buffoon thinks creation happened naturally, but the idiot says, "What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?" as the crap-for-brains ignores the CLEAR science that creation had to happen by God supernaturally! Still the fool who ignores the laws farted out, "I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." Notice his mocking God, "man in the sky" as if that makes him look smart as he completely ignores the evidence.
His question, "Who made God?" is as dumb as he is.
So in his way of foolish thinking, if a supernatural creator created the natural realm, then that supernatural creator who created the natural realm with its natural laws has then become also bound by those natural laws the supernatural creator created. So explain why a supernatural creator is also bound by the laws the supernatural creator created. Or, show how smart you are and just give your science for creation happening naturally and don't forget to give your science how the natural laws were created, too. If he wanted to act smart, it may be a good idea to actually show you are.
Sagan the dumbass will at some point face his Maker for his judgment of what he believed in this life. His extreme shame and regret was all his choice. He wanted to be a hypocritical dumbass. Then he'll be thrown into the lake of fire. It will be his 'The End' and be remembered no more. ALL his choice and for others who follow that fool.
u damn right
I had tears in my eyes watching this and I don't understand why.
Don't worry. You will.
Ken, every single time I watch this I tear up! Every - single - time. No matter how much I think I am used to it, it just HITS me every time! It sums up humanity, sums up everything said in every book and every religious text and every political doctrine; it speaks for Earth itself. In retrospect, we see that only Sagan COULD have been the man responsible for the record on Voyager I, as a greeting to the cosmos.
You're not alone in this regard.
me too ! just shows how similar we are , no matter if we come from rich countries or poor , cold or hot , west or the east , the truth strikes everyone ! because we are all HUMANS
Coz you love earth
carl, your molecules are scattered amongst our earth. you quite literally have transformed to become the air we breathe, the grass we see, the water we drink. you live on, as do your ideas and passion. may you rest well. thank you.
This video should be translated into all available languages and should be played in all the schools, colleges, universities and specialy in Parliaments for the sake of this beautiful and rare planet.
I don't know if this will help...but a band called nightwish did a song that is based on this..beautiful song❤
The visual of the Earth nearly filling the frame, and then slowly receding to nothing but a dot in a sunbeam with the other planets passing by (except Uranus), combined with the soothing music, and Sagan’s mellow narration, really makes this more emotional than it ever could have been in my opinion.
The piano at the end (3:05) with Neptune flying by, literally almost made me shed a tear.
Rest in peace, Carl Sagan. You may be gone, but you will never be forgotten.
Rest in peace Carl. You were incredible. Thank you for you.
This video should play in reverse.... start with the mote of dust, suspended in a sunbeam, and move inward for the reveal
True
That's an interesting thought, but, on balance, I think this version works in that it leaves you appreciating the wonder of the pale blue dot, whereas your version would lose that. Perhaps it depends on whether you're familiar with this speech or not; your version might work for those who have never encountered it before.
Every politician on the planet should look at this video to remind them that no matter how big their bombs are, humans are truly insignificant fighting over nothing.
Humans have always been so self involved,and no one brought this into more perspective than carl.
Every being comes into this world as the center of the universe. We spend our whole lives widening our scope to include everything else that is, if we work hard enough at it.
This is true of you, as well.
This is just as true of our species as it is true for the individuals of our species.
We will grow in time. What other species can you name that has come to know ourselves and the world(s) around us as we have.
We may not be the only game in the universe, but we are the only game in the solar system.
We can be a little cocky, but life itself is the great humbler.
I agree--we may live on a mote of dust, but we can think and reason and discover and question and understand, which is something to be proud of. In his 1965 astronomy education book, "Challenge of the Universe," Dr. J. Allen Hynek wrote to his readers (mostly middle school and high school students) that they need not feel insignificant, knowing that the Earth is just a point in space. He wrote, "In the final analysis, the mind that encompasses the universe is greater than the universe that encompasses the mind."
@@j.jasonwentworth723 If you follow Carl you don't think and reason.
Carl Sagan "The Cosmos is all that is or was or ever will be."
Carl Sagan, "I can’t imagine anyone denying the existence of the laws of nature, but I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky."
More from the clueless Carl, --It’s perfectly possible that the universe is infinitely old and therefore uncaused. In fact, there are detailed cosmological models that hold such a view and that are consistent with everything we know. To my mind, it seems not fully satisfactory to say that there was a first cause. That seems to postpone dealing with the problem rather than solving it. If we say “God” made the universe, then surely the next question is, “Who made God?” If we say “God” was always here, why not say the universe was always here? If we say that the question “Where did God come from?” is too tough for us poor mortals to understand, then why not say that the question of, “Where did the universe come from?” is too tough for us mortals? In what way, exactly, does the God hypothesis advance our knowledge of cosmology? What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?"--
from: www.uscatholic.org/articles/202001/god-and-carl-sagan-cosmos-big-enough-both-them-31939
Read the article. Have a laugh for what a hypocritical, lying, mocking, disgusting, person he was.
Carl cannot get around these laws and what they lead to...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
....yet he thinks creation happened naturally, "What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?"
He ignores the CLEAR science that creation had to happen by God supernaturally! Still, he ignores the laws...
"I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." Notice his mocking God, "man in the sky" as if that makes him look smart as he completely ignores the evidence.
His question, "Who made God?" is as pathetic as he is.
So in his way of useless thinking, if a supernatural creator created the natural realm, then that supernatural creator who created the natural realm with its natural laws has then become also bound by those natural laws the supernatural creator created. So explain why a supernatural creator is also bound by the laws the supernatural creator created. Or, show how smart you are and just give your science for creation happening naturally, and don't forget to give your science how the natural laws were created, too. If he wanted to act smart, it may be a good idea to actually show you are.
Sagan lived his empty life clueless and has clueless followers.
Most important lecturer of human history
I'm telling you, these lines were better than that was written in thousand religious books in this insignificant (meaning, time) world.
When I get too much information about all these wars and conflicts going on all over the world I think about or come back to this video. Here we are doing that again, in the same place on the same spots. For the same reasons. Learned a lot since he first made this, and we put it all into doing the same old stuff.
Yes, we are alone. But we are alone in this together.
That belief--that "the human race is doomed"--can very easily become a self-fulfilling prophecy. It is also very far from being a new notion; in every age, people have said the same thing, but so far, every prediction of it happening (usually in the days of the utterers, or soon afterward) has proved wrong. I take solace in that reassuring statistic. One day, humanity *may* destroy itself (or, like Rome, but on a global scale, may descend into barbarism for one reason or another), but if we just give up and accept it as inevitable, it will be more likely to happen because no one will be working to create a better future.
This made me smile, it will take time but we will eventually get there. Like you said, together.
Lol I like the pun. "We are ALONE (all in) this together
Law of probability
Carl Sagan "The Cosmos is all that is or was or ever will be."
Carl Sagan, "I can’t imagine anyone denying the existence of the laws of nature, but I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky."
More from the dumbass, "It’s perfectly possible that the universe is infinitely old and therefore uncaused. In fact, there are detailed cosmological models that hold such a view and that are consistent with everything we know. To my mind, it seems not fully satisfactory to say that there was a first cause. That seems to postpone dealing with the problem rather than solving it. If we say “God” made the universe, then surely the next question is, “Who made God?” If we say “God” was always here, why not say the universe was always here? If we say that the question “Where did God come from?” is too tough for us poor mortals to understand, then why not say that the question of, “Where did the universe come from?” is too tough for us mortals? In what way, exactly, does the God hypothesis advance our knowledge of cosmology? What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?"
from: www.uscatholic.org/articles/202001/god-and-carl-sagan-cosmos-big-enough-both-them-31939
Read the article. Have a vomit bag or trash can nearby for what a hypocritical, lying, mocking, disgusting, foolish person he was.
Now, Carl the dumbass NEVER can get around these laws and what the lead to...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
....yet the buffoon thinks creation happened naturally, but the idiot says, "What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?" as the crap-for-brains ignores the CLEAR science that creation had to happen by God supernaturally! Still the fool who ignores the laws farted out, "I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." Notice his mocking God, "man in the sky" as if that makes him look smart as he completely ignores the evidence.
His question, "Who made God?" is as dumb as he is.
So in his way of foolish thinking, if a supernatural creator created the natural realm, then that supernatural creator who created the natural realm with its natural laws has then become also bound by those natural laws the supernatural creator created. So explain why a supernatural creator is also bound by the laws the supernatural creator created. Or, show how smart you are and just give your science for creation happening naturally and don't forget to give your science how the natural laws were created, too. If he wanted to act smart, it may be a good idea to actually show you are.
Sagan the dumbass will at some point face his Maker for his judgment of what he believed in this life. His extreme shame and regret was all his choice. He wanted to be a hypocritical dumbass. Then he'll be thrown into the lake of fire. It will be his 'The End' and be remembered no more. ALL his choice and for others who follow that fool.
Still an absolutely awe inspiring video/speech. One of the greatest of all time in my opinion.
I'm 61 years old, and this proves that one never stop learning and discovering new things. Thanks to a fine man I had the opportunity to listen this speech. Very motivational indeed and to know that this Pale Blue Dot still has lots of good humans, like Mr. Carl Sagan, who can make this place a better one.
Carl didn't make this place any better spreading his lies. Be real.
The 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LoT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. It is clear creation had to be done supernaturally yet it is still denied because people are just too proud to accept that, among other things.
Asking how God was created as if that answered something is downright silly. Your question doesn't even make sense. Clearly creation had to be done by a supernatural creator. A supernatural who created the natural realm of time, space, and matter, along with the natural laws that govern it, is not bound by the natural laws the supernatural creator created. That's basic logic but you are NOT logical.
I would like this played at my funeral! Beautiful piece of writing!
It's up there with the requiem from Rocky Horror.
What a great remastering of a timeless classic. Carl, you were beautifully poetic in life, and your words will resonate and continue with time with those whom have a mind to listen.
Brings a tear to my eye-so painfully yet exquisitely beautiful
I listened to this in middle school and it's still stuck with me until now, thank you for this wonderful piece❤️ it really motivates me to help save the earth
I have always watched this so many times to lift my spirit whenever I feel low. The deep and calming voice and the awesome wisdom of the narration instantly hits you hard and makes you realize how most of our worries are over worthless stuff and brings you back to reality. It refreshes your thoughts and even makes you feel ashamed at times about the time we waste worrying over superficial hardships of our lives. It also makes you feel that we are so fortunate to be at such a beautiful and happening location in such a vast and endless darkness of space.
I listen to this when I'm distressed. I listen when I can't sleep at night, and I wonder how I can make ends meet. Carl's words seem to put it all into a better perspective for me. I don't know how or why, but I feel comforted by these words.
Yeah, don't listen to what God says in the bible, go by clueless Carl's words.
Carl Sagan "The Cosmos is all that is or was or ever will be."
Carl Sagan, "I can’t imagine anyone denying the existence of the laws of nature, but I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky."
More from the clueless Carl, --It’s perfectly possible that the universe is infinitely old and therefore uncaused. In fact, there are detailed cosmological models that hold such a view and that are consistent with everything we know. To my mind, it seems not fully satisfactory to say that there was a first cause. That seems to postpone dealing with the problem rather than solving it. If we say “God” made the universe, then surely the next question is, “Who made God?” If we say “God” was always here, why not say the universe was always here? If we say that the question “Where did God come from?” is too tough for us poor mortals to understand, then why not say that the question of, “Where did the universe come from?” is too tough for us mortals? In what way, exactly, does the God hypothesis advance our knowledge of cosmology? What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?"--
from: www.uscatholic.org/articles/202001/god-and-carl-sagan-cosmos-big-enough-both-them-31939
Read the article. Have a laugh for what a hypocritical, lying, mocking, disgusting, person he was.
Carl cannot get around these laws and what they lead to...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
....yet he thinks creation happened naturally, "What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?"
He ignores the CLEAR science that creation had to happen by God supernaturally! Still, he ignores the laws...
"I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." Notice his mocking God, "man in the sky" as if that makes him look smart as he completely ignores the evidence.
His question, "Who made God?" is as pathetic as he is.
So in his way of useless thinking, if a supernatural creator created the natural realm, then that supernatural creator who created the natural realm with its natural laws has then become also bound by those natural laws the supernatural creator created. So explain why a supernatural creator is also bound by the laws the supernatural creator created. Or, show how smart you are and just give your science for creation happening naturally, and don't forget to give your science how the natural laws were created, too. If he wanted to act smart, it may be a good idea to actually show you are.
Sagan lived his empty life clueless and has clueless followers.
@2fast2block hey pathetic troll, there is no God, Bible was written by some clueless person like you, stop spamming the real truth you troll, nobody cares what you write
@@reymisterio1386 wow, I need to inform loser you that you gave nothing to prove me wrong. All you did is show what a loser you are ignoring what I wrote. It's your loser life going nowhere but doom.
@2fast2block I don't need to prove you anything, I don't argue with ignorant trolls, go pray to your God to see if it can do a miracle and make you a bit smarter
@@reymisterio1386 you just go on treating life and the evidence as one big joke. It will all be on you at your The End.
That's poetry, REAL poetry!
Thanks Carl, for ALL you did!
An BIG HUG from Italy💙🤍💖🖤🤍💙
How fortunate we are for Carl Sagan's presence. I look forward to the moment when I can live up to his level of kindness.
കണ്ണ് നനയാതെ ഇത് കേട്ടിരിക്കാൻ ആവില്ല. ഇത്രത്തോളം ഹൃദയസ്പർശിയായ കേൾക്കുന്നവരുടെ കണ്ണു തുറപ്പിക്കുന്ന ഒരു സ്പീച്ച് വേറെയുണ്ടാവില്ല
Carl Sagan 😍😍🔥🔥
Happy 86th, Carl Sagan. May your wisdom and enthusiasm stretch forward into the cosmos and into the future.
Words more profound have seldom been spoken... I could listen to this every single day of my life and still be moved by the power of those words
Living in Shanghai, experienced one lockdown and very like a second coming, feeling the unusual heat that has never occurred to this beloved city, got hurt and manipulated by someone important and finally manage to get out of the control, my tears are just shedding like waterfall watching this video
I miss him terribly. Mr. Sagan, you will always hail in my life as the greatest Astronomer /Physicist to have ever lived. I am honored that you were here in my life time. Every time I hear "The Pale Blue Dot", I am brought to tears, because I have a comprehension of how important and special our little blue dot is, at the same time realizing how much humanity in it's present state of evolution takes it all and each other for granted. I so wish everyone could have such a realization of exactly who and what we are, what our planet is, within this vastness. If so, then Humanity would finally breach the final hurtle of becoming ...turly humanized. Realization and intellect would finally reign over what is left of our animalistic brain stem nature. Next to the Universe its self, you stood as my inspiration. May you be enjoying your afterlife, and enjoying the universe in unparalleled splendor.
To me, this is the most beautiful monologue ever spoken. I miss Carl.
It's because you are as clueless as Carl thinking this all came about on its own.
@@2fast2blockSagan never made any such claim. As a scientist, he could only speculate as to how all of this came about. In that sense, I suppose, he was as clueless as the rest of us. Whereas you’re just a meanspirited, ignorant troll.
He is a poet. Don't know why whenever I listen it I cry
Me too...
There is simply no one who has said it better. and had the ability to show us this better than Carl Sagan, he is greatly missed.
This simple speech should be listened to by every single human being. No matter who you are, where youre from, what you think, or any of that crap, if youre human this should speak to you.
I remember as a kid the time it was first broadcast, yet it still send a tingle down my spine.
This touches the deepest depths of my soul…Carl Sagan was the greatest science communicator!
Years ago I purchased the poster of Pale Blue Dot and had it professionally framed and it is always in view at home as a reminder to me what a powerful photo this is! Not a day goes by that I don't miss Carl Sagan!
This speech of Carl Sagan make me feel so sensible that always I end crying. His message was and will be remembering so powerful and full of truth!
When I feel the need to be ground, I will come and listen to this essay a few times
😢 my all time favourite UA-cam video, lump in throat everytime, maybe one day we will all come together as 1 people and look out together, and go forward together, stop killing each other, stop hating each other, alas not in my lifetime 🌏🌏🌏🌏🌏🌏
Why? Because clueless Carl thinks this all came about by mere chance accidents? Wow, that is no basis for following morals.
@@2fast2block mmmm, clueless Carl, I take it you believe in some god sitting on a cloud, I will stick with clueless Carl thanks 👍
@@reynardcole2043 "I take it you believe in some god sitting on a cloud"
You take it because you make things up with no proof just like your empty Carl did. For laughs though, copy and paste where I said that. You came about by mere accidents with no proof then claim to know morals.
Carl Sagan "The Cosmos is all that is or was or ever will be."
Carl Sagan, "I can’t imagine anyone denying the existence of the laws of nature, but I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky."
More from the clueless Carl, --It’s perfectly possible that the universe is infinitely old and therefore uncaused. In fact, there are detailed cosmological models that hold such a view and that are consistent with everything we know. To my mind, it seems not fully satisfactory to say that there was a first cause. That seems to postpone dealing with the problem rather than solving it. If we say “God” made the universe, then surely the next question is, “Who made God?” If we say “God” was always here, why not say the universe was always here? If we say that the question “Where did God come from?” is too tough for us poor mortals to understand, then why not say that the question of, “Where did the universe come from?” is too tough for us mortals? In what way, exactly, does the God hypothesis advance our knowledge of cosmology? What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?"--
from: www.uscatholic.org/articles/202001/god-and-carl-sagan-cosmos-big-enough-both-them-31939
Read the article. Have a laugh for what a hypocritical, lying, mocking, disgusting, person he was.
Carl cannot get around these laws and what they lead to...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
....yet he thinks creation happened naturally, "What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?"
He ignores the CLEAR science that creation had to happen by God supernaturally! Still, he ignores the laws...
"I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." Notice his mocking God, "man in the sky" as if that makes him look smart as he completely ignores the evidence.
His question, "Who made God?" is as pathetic as he is.
So in his way of useless thinking, if a supernatural creator created the natural realm, then that supernatural creator who created the natural realm with its natural laws has then become also bound by those natural laws the supernatural creator created. So explain why a supernatural creator is also bound by the laws the supernatural creator created. Or, show how smart you are and just give your science for creation happening naturally, and don't forget to give your science how the natural laws were created, too. If he wanted to act smart, it may be a good idea to actually show you are.
Sagan lived his empty life clueless and has clueless followers.
@@2fast2block i now believe 👍
The people who appreciate this video are the kind of people that I want to be friends with.
Beautifully made & a MUST BE WATCHED by everyone. Must be shown in every School, every village, town, city, club, office,industry, institute... It should be translated to all languages & be part of the learning for every human being on the planet.
Great words. Great sentiments. If only they could inspire actions and not just feelings.
well said. and that exactly has been science's failure so far
I wouldn't say it's science's failure, because it's not exactly science's job. It's every human's job. We can all be kinder to one another, all inspire each other with the love we give each other to be better people. All it takes is one brave person to inspire the people around them to bravery, and I believe all of us can be that brave.
How can you know that they have not inspired action?
Arthur easy their dude your starting to speak for a whole group. That’s no Bueno
Dumb words from a fool, Carl.
Carl Sagan "The Cosmos is all that is or was or ever will be."
Carl Sagan, "I can’t imagine anyone denying the existence of the laws of nature, but I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky."
More from the dumbass, "It’s perfectly possible that the universe is infinitely old and therefore uncaused. In fact, there are detailed cosmological models that hold such a view and that are consistent with everything we know. To my mind, it seems not fully satisfactory to say that there was a first cause. That seems to postpone dealing with the problem rather than solving it. If we say “God” made the universe, then surely the next question is, “Who made God?” If we say “God” was always here, why not say the universe was always here? If we say that the question “Where did God come from?” is too tough for us poor mortals to understand, then why not say that the question of, “Where did the universe come from?” is too tough for us mortals? In what way, exactly, does the God hypothesis advance our knowledge of cosmology? What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?"
from: www.uscatholic.org/articles/202001/god-and-carl-sagan-cosmos-big-enough-both-them-31939
Read the article. Have a vomit bag or trash can nearby for what a hypocritical, lying, mocking, disgusting, foolish person he was.
Now, Carl the dumbass NEVER can get around these laws and what the lead to...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
....yet the buffoon thinks creation happened naturally, but the idiot says, "What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?" as the crap-for-brains ignores the CLEAR science that creation had to happen by God supernaturally! Still the fool who ignores the laws farted out, "I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." Notice his mocking God, "man in the sky" as if that makes him look smart as he completely ignores the evidence.
His question, "Who made God?" is as dumb as he is.
So in his way of foolish thinking, if a supernatural creator created the natural realm, then that supernatural creator who created the natural realm with its natural laws has then become also bound by those natural laws the supernatural creator created. So explain why a supernatural creator is also bound by the laws the supernatural creator created. Or, show how smart you are and just give your science for creation happening naturally and don't forget to give your science how the natural laws were created, too. If he wanted to act smart, it may be a good idea to actually show you are.
Sagan the dumbass will at some point face his Maker for his judgment of what he believed in this life. His extreme shame and regret was all his choice. He wanted to be a hypocritical dumbass. Then he'll be thrown into the lake of fire. It will be his 'The End' and be remembered no more. ALL his choice and for others who follow that fool.
If everyone watched this…
War, poverty, racism… all of that gone.
Look at what’s at stake here…
"Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors so that in glory and in triumph they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot"
This is very relevant today as Russia invades Ukraine.
I remember watching this, it changed my perspective on man kind. Funny how mankind knew this thousands of years ago, to protect our mother, earth. And we call ourselves advanced, while we destroy our home.
Who says science can't be poetic?
Science is the poetry of reality.
ua-cam.com/video/9Cd36WJ79z4/v-deo.html&start_radio=1
Carl's science is as poetic as a fart.
Carl Sagan "The Cosmos is all that is or was or ever will be."
Carl Sagan, "I can’t imagine anyone denying the existence of the laws of nature, but I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky."
More from the dumbass, "It’s perfectly possible that the universe is infinitely old and therefore uncaused. In fact, there are detailed cosmological models that hold such a view and that are consistent with everything we know. To my mind, it seems not fully satisfactory to say that there was a first cause. That seems to postpone dealing with the problem rather than solving it. If we say “God” made the universe, then surely the next question is, “Who made God?” If we say “God” was always here, why not say the universe was always here? If we say that the question “Where did God come from?” is too tough for us poor mortals to understand, then why not say that the question of, “Where did the universe come from?” is too tough for us mortals? In what way, exactly, does the God hypothesis advance our knowledge of cosmology? What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?"
from: www.uscatholic.org/articles/202001/god-and-carl-sagan-cosmos-big-enough-both-them-31939
Read the article. Have a vomit bag or trash can nearby for what a hypocritical, lying, mocking, disgusting, foolish person he was.
Now, Carl the dumbass NEVER can get around these laws and what the lead to...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
....yet the buffoon thinks creation happened naturally, but the idiot says, "What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?" as the crap-for-brains ignores the CLEAR science that creation had to happen by God supernaturally! Still the fool who ignores the laws farted out, "I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." Notice his mocking God, "man in the sky" as if that makes him look smart as he completely ignores the evidence.
His question, "Who made God?" is as dumb as he is.
So in his way of foolish thinking, if a supernatural creator created the natural realm, then that supernatural creator who created the natural realm with its natural laws has then become also bound by those natural laws the supernatural creator created. So explain why a supernatural creator is also bound by the laws the supernatural creator created. Or, show how smart you are and just give your science for creation happening naturally and don't forget to give your science how the natural laws were created, too. If he wanted to act smart, it may be a good idea to actually show you are.
Sagan the dumbass will at some point face his Maker for his judgment of what he believed in this life. His extreme shame and regret was all his choice. He wanted to be a hypocritical dumbass. Then he'll be thrown into the lake of fire. It will be his 'The End' and be remembered no more. ALL his choice and for others who follow that fool.
The only thing that's close to a fart is your narrow mind, thinking you and your god know it all. No one has the answer to who created this world we live in, not me, not you, not sagan and not your god, we just assume things based on our perceptions of the world. Accept the fact that you just simply don't know. You don't know whether your god is real, you just assume it is because everyone says so... believe those "preachers", "chosen servants of god" or "those who have felt god", really ? I might as well had my ass itching yesterday, maybe I felt god and I didn't know... you people are so gullible and all this religion is bullshit, every religion. thousands of years we as a race we believed in gods, trying to justify the good and evil that's happening in the world with fairy tales. It's the 21st century, just fucking get over it already.
@@LikeAGroove oh boy, let's see the science you have to counter mine....
"No one has the answer to who created this world we live in, not me, not you, not sagan and not your god, we just assume things based on our perceptions of the world."
Can you have someone in grade school that CAN read what I said to you? I did put science that we KNOW. Once they read it to you then don't go into pussy rubbing mode, actually give science, not word farts.
The rest was typical pussy rubbing word farting fill-ins with NO science to prove me wrong. You're such an imbecile you thought it wouldn't be noticed. Sorry, the ignoramus in your shines brightly. No hiding it.
@@2fast2block I don't think it's right to offend him because you have another opinion. I don't think he called anyone who believes in god or anything else a "dumbass". Of course you can have your own view and opinion, but then say it in a decent way please. How dare you saying things like that just because someone is not sharing your opinion? Somebody who REALLY cares wouldn't go out there and scream around "y'all are fucking ignorant pussies because you .....(don't share my opinion)", right??? Who do you think you are, talking to people like that? It's people like you who are offending others intentionally and on their own initiative! If someone tries to hurt you, defend yourself (or others, of course!), but let the people live their lives just as you want them to let you live yours. And by the way: how are you so sure about being right? Hear me out... me for example... personally, i don't "believe" that there is a god. But i'd never say that i know there isn't. Because i just CAN'T be sure about it. Just as you can't know that there is one. We are humans. We can see, smell, taste, feel and hear. But wait - doesn't it all only happen in our brains? Everything we see...how can we be sure that in reality it looks exactly the way we see it? We can't. Theoretically, everything (EVERYTHING) we have ever seen, heard, etc. could also not be true (or not the only truth). I'm not saying that it isn't, but i'm saying that it's possible. Because everything is possible. We with our modest 5 senses... how can we be sure? We can't. Maybe there IS a god. I cannot know. In my opinion, humans can rely on science the most, because it's based on facts that could have been observed by us, by our modest 5 senses. There are many things that cannot be observed by our senses, although we're still pretty convinced they exist (microwaves for example.. electrons... protons... quarks... oof there are so many), but they could have been proven with logical thinking which we have developed throughout the years (based on the natural laws which we experience every day).
And i have another quick question: how are you sure that it's your "religion" which is right? There are numerous religions and some of them are probably also similar to yours, so how do you know that it's you and only you who is right? As i said, i'm not sure that there isn't a god. All of it is possible. I think one shouldn't think that his opinion is the only right one. I think that people should be more open to other points of view.
This is something I wamt to show my son when he is rational enough to digest this.
Dearly missed, Dr. Sagan was and always will be my super star 💫
Whenever I miss your voice, I have to listen to this speech. RIP Mr. Sagan.
He was just a fool.
Carl Sagan "The Cosmos is all that is or was or ever will be."
Carl Sagan, "I can’t imagine anyone denying the existence of the laws of nature, but I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky."
More from the dumbass, "It’s perfectly possible that the universe is infinitely old and therefore uncaused. In fact, there are detailed cosmological models that hold such a view and that are consistent with everything we know. To my mind, it seems not fully satisfactory to say that there was a first cause. That seems to postpone dealing with the problem rather than solving it. If we say “God” made the universe, then surely the next question is, “Who made God?” If we say “God” was always here, why not say the universe was always here? If we say that the question “Where did God come from?” is too tough for us poor mortals to understand, then why not say that the question of, “Where did the universe come from?” is too tough for us mortals? In what way, exactly, does the God hypothesis advance our knowledge of cosmology? What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?"
from: www.uscatholic.org/articles/202001/god-and-carl-sagan-cosmos-big-enough-both-them-31939
Read the article. Have a vomit bag or trash can nearby for what a hypocritical, lying, mocking, disgusting, foolish person he was.
Now, Carl the dumbass NEVER can get around these laws and what the lead to...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it.
....yet the buffoon thinks creation happened naturally, but the idiot says, "What predictions does it make on which the hypothesis will stand or fall?" as the crap-for-brains ignores the CLEAR science that creation had to happen by God supernaturally! Still the fool who ignores the laws farted out, "I don’t know of any compelling evidence for the old man in the sky." Notice his mocking God, "man in the sky" as if that makes him look smart as he completely ignores the evidence.
His question, "Who made God?" is as dumb as he is.
So in his way of foolish thinking, if a supernatural creator created the natural realm, then that supernatural creator who created the natural realm with its natural laws has then become also bound by those natural laws the supernatural creator created. So explain why a supernatural creator is also bound by the laws the supernatural creator created. Or, show how smart you are and just give your science for creation happening naturally and don't forget to give your science how the natural laws were created, too. If he wanted to act smart, it may be a good idea to actually show you are.
Sagan the dumbass will at some point face his Maker for his judgment of what he believed in this life. His extreme shame and regret was all his choice. He wanted to be a hypocritical dumbass. Then he'll be thrown into the lake of fire. It will be his 'The End' and be remembered no more. ALL his choice and for others who follow that fool.
@@2fast2block Name calling just makes your argument childish.
This should be shown everywhere on earth day.
Goosebumps!! The most perfect monologue written about our planet. And our species. Ever.
When I was 12 I had a tape of this speech, I played it over the speakers during church. That's when the pastor asked my mom to not bring me anymore.
If someone in the church began to question organized religion, it was worth it.