Really good trip. Loved all the tests, including the pan. I was looking for some warping in the horizon and buildings, but perhaps, that may happen on sideways tracking 2x really brings more character and its gorgeous and of course, the depth of field with the taking lens choices. Really awesome
Didn't see this vid on the review page - must have missed it. Very useful footage. What's the optical effect we're seeing behind the subject's nose in the shots at night (e.g. the 85 @ t2.8 around the 4 min mark)? It's like a drop shadow or something! I guess as a result of telephoto compression / distance from subject to background but amplified through the bright night-time bokeh. Kind of distracting but otherwise a very compelling set at that price. Might pick up an 85 and a 45
Okay, so these versus the Atlas Mercury's and the Sirui 1.6's, when can we see that? They look great by themselves but back to back how do they stack up?
@markkenfield7578 these are nothing close to The atlas Orions wide open. Actually none of those lenses you mentioned behaves like the Orions wide open. Maybe the other 3 act like each other. The Orions are soft in a vintage way ( in a good way) wide open while these retain sharpness and look more modern. Orions also have horrible CA wide open in high contrast situations as opposed to the others. I shoot my Orions wide open alot when not in high contrast scenarios because of that more vintage look..which those other lenses cannot deliver (including the Mercurys).
@@jambred Havant shot on the Orions personally but I can definitely see a difference as you mentioned. There is a very beautiful softness wide open that the other lenses don't have. I particularly like the look of the 65mm Orion..
Really good trip. Loved all the tests, including the pan. I was looking for some warping in the horizon and buildings, but perhaps, that may happen on sideways tracking
2x really brings more character and its gorgeous and of course, the depth of field with the taking lens choices. Really awesome
Didn't see this vid on the review page - must have missed it. Very useful footage. What's the optical effect we're seeing behind the subject's nose in the shots at night (e.g. the 85 @ t2.8 around the 4 min mark)? It's like a drop shadow or something! I guess as a result of telephoto compression / distance from subject to background but amplified through the bright night-time bokeh. Kind of distracting but otherwise a very compelling set at that price. Might pick up an 85 and a 45
Great shots, a perfect addition to the written review. What camera and codecs did you use?
Great!
they look great any word on pricing ?
$5,000 USD
What camera system was used here?
Great footage. What aspect ratio is this?
2.39:1
Shot in what ?
We need to know this as it effects sensor size (full frame or S35), so I second this question: shot on what camera?
Okay, so these versus the Atlas Mercury's and the Sirui 1.6's, when can we see that? They look great by themselves but back to back how do they stack up?
@markkenfield7578 these are nothing close to The atlas Orions wide open. Actually none of those lenses you mentioned behaves like the Orions wide open. Maybe the other 3 act like each other. The Orions are soft in a vintage way ( in a good way) wide open while these retain sharpness and look more modern. Orions also have horrible CA wide open in high contrast situations as opposed to the others. I shoot my Orions wide open alot when not in high contrast scenarios because of that more vintage look..which those other lenses cannot deliver (including the Mercurys).
@@jambred Havant shot on the Orions personally but I can definitely see a difference as you mentioned. There is a very beautiful softness wide open that the other lenses don't have. I particularly like the look of the 65mm Orion..