❖ Calculating a Definite Integral Using Riemann Sums - Part 2 ❖

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 вер 2024
  • 📚 Setting Up Definite Integrals with Riemann Sums: Step-by-Step Guide (Part 2) 🧮
    In this video, I show you how to evaluate the limit form of the definite integral for this example.
    🚀 What you’ll learn:
    How to set up a evaluate a definite integral using the Riemann Sum definition.
    In this part, I actually compute the Riemann Sum to find the solution. While you may already know the faster, modern method to evaluate this integral, this tutorial focuses on the core concept and gives you a deep understanding of how integration was originally approached.
    This video is perfect for anyone learning calculus, preparing for exams, or those interested in understanding the deeper fundamentals of integration. Don’t worry, I’ll also show you the quicker way to do this in future videos!
    👍 Don’t forget to like, subscribe, and hit the notification bell for more math tutorials! 🔔✨
    Watch now to master setting up definite integrals using Riemann sums and grasp the basics of integration!
    #RiemannSums #DefiniteIntegral #Calculus #MathTutorial #LearningMath #Mathematics #IntegralSetup #STEM #MathHelp #IntegrationFundamentals #APCalculus #EducationalContent #AreasUnderCurves #IntegrationConcepts #ReimannSum

КОМЕНТАРІ • 498

  • @charliehoskin6283
    @charliehoskin6283 10 років тому +72

    Congratulations, you may be the first and only lefty to do an entire problem on white board without smearing any of it. From one lefty to another, props.

    • @gta4everrr
      @gta4everrr 10 років тому +2

      I always have to write awkwardly when i get to the middle of the white board to prevent smearing.

    • @VndNvwYvvSvv
      @VndNvwYvvSvv 4 роки тому

      Then learn to write correctly... To write right, if you will.

    • @charliehoskin6283
      @charliehoskin6283 4 роки тому +1

      Uncomfortable Truth i don’t know the left just feels better and more justified to me

  • @patrickjmt
    @patrickjmt  14 років тому +131

    it is hard for everyone, myself included.
    you all only see the end result after thousands of hours of study on my part... and not all the frustrating moments getting to where i am now

  • @midnightpanda
    @midnightpanda 13 років тому +10

    You've become a integral part of my math experience.

  • @_MARS_
    @_MARS_ 11 років тому +25

    "WELL NOT NOT LAZY!, JUST CLEVER!!!" lol...very true

  • @meditationtube7572
    @meditationtube7572 7 років тому +1

    best explanation for Riemann sums~!!! was stuck all day yesterday until i came across your videos and clarified everything in seconds...thank you

  • @windskipops
    @windskipops 12 років тому

    I feel like i've wasted so much time trying to understand these problems... seriously, just watching 15 minutes of video and it makes crystal clear sense... simply amazing.

  • @mexiangel1994
    @mexiangel1994 11 років тому +3

    I have to say, I have been watching your videos since I am prepping for my college final in calc and you've helped a lot, especially with this integral stuff.lol thank you

  • @RayRay-fq4wc
    @RayRay-fq4wc 6 років тому

    Did this in my calc class...the prof messes up every time has to be corrected by students. Was beyond confused but makes sense now. You're amazing.

  • @js6431
    @js6431 8 років тому +3

    Cool, calm and clear. Why can't lecturers see this? :) Thanks for this. I missed the first three days of my lectures for calculus, flu does not play nice, but thankfully clued up now.

  • @GC-we6kd
    @GC-we6kd 8 років тому +28

    Great teacher !!! preparing for my final exam in less than 7 hours hahaha

    • @profusion7148
      @profusion7148 8 років тому +1

      Late response, but did you do well on the exam ?

    • @GC-we6kd
      @GC-we6kd 8 років тому

      yea i did okay !

    • @profusion7148
      @profusion7148 8 років тому

      nice

    • @alrijini301
      @alrijini301 5 років тому

      More like 30 mins before the test 😅

    • @Bllksem
      @Bllksem 3 роки тому +1

      hahaha mines more than 3 weeks away :/

  • @Evatar7
    @Evatar7 9 років тому

    Oh my god, you are one of the only people I could find who actually demonstrates this in a way I understand. You have my gratitude.

  • @orbaku4039
    @orbaku4039 11 років тому

    Thank you very much for the help. My high school Calculus teacher doesn't really teach how to do a problem, he just does it on the board and then gives us homework. I've tried reading the book too and I can't seem to make sense of it but you finally actually TAUGHT me how to do it. So I say again: thank you so much. :)

  • @mikemai8568
    @mikemai8568 9 років тому +1

    Thank you for taking time to broke down the equation step-by-step. It was long and confused process, but you made it simple and understandable. Thumbs up!

  • @TheBassEnthusiast
    @TheBassEnthusiast 12 років тому

    Our class wasn't taught Riemann Sums in class to the point where we were comfortable, and I have a test this morning where one of these calculations is present. I now understand them thoroughly enough to navigate through a Riemann problem, and I appreciate your help in doing so. Thankfully I found the video just before the test this morning, we'll see how it goes!
    Best regards,
    B

  • @purrpkp
    @purrpkp 14 років тому

    Amazing, worked for hours and never came to understand this at all, now after watching the video I think I've got it, Thanks!

  • @yogotah
    @yogotah 12 років тому

    Not going to lie, I love watching your videos. You don't go too fast, but you also don't go too slow either. Perfect combination, I have a good calc teacher actually, but my class is so distracting we can't get anything done, glad to have you as back up. YOU and Khan of course.

  • @janetsawari1677
    @janetsawari1677 10 років тому +1

    Wow!! woke up at 2 am to watch this and it paid off, Thank You Patrick you just make Math easier :)

  • @futuristcorporation
    @futuristcorporation 12 років тому

    Thank you so much for creating this video. Self-learner here so I do not have a professor I can go ask. These two videos clarified a lot of things that I just was not getting from reading Stewart over and over.

  • @chueneelvin2696
    @chueneelvin2696 10 років тому +1

    Your explanations are vivid and clear as crystal

  • @ethannichols5672
    @ethannichols5672 11 років тому

    Thank you for explaining this. My professor was kinda vague when she taught us this. I couldn't understand how everything plugged in and worked together, but now I do. This video helped me out a lot!

  • @aztecatenocx
    @aztecatenocx 14 років тому

    You just made my day. You explained this very clearly and explained how you did certain parts.
    Wish you were my instructor

  • @nafslee
    @nafslee 15 років тому

    i have learnt so much from you in these 2 vids than i have in my lectures.. thanks

  • @apongnwufopenawoh8910
    @apongnwufopenawoh8910 8 років тому +1

    thank you so much sir...i'm in college now and the professor is so fast, but i understand you perfectly. this was very very helpful! (now i can breathe)...God bless!

  • @niallcello
    @niallcello 14 років тому

    thanks for this video. the concept really clicked after watching it. your explanation is very thorough and clear.

  • @mocha_bear00
    @mocha_bear00 9 років тому +1

    dude, thanks a lot. I have an exam 4 hours later and you make me understand this in 10 minutes

  • @AzatDzhanybekov
    @AzatDzhanybekov 8 років тому

    Good Job Patrick.
    After 7 years Your instructions are still helpful.

  • @TheYourfaceable
    @TheYourfaceable 7 років тому

    Absolutely perfect man. I have a calculus final coming up, and riemann sums were something we did at the beginning of the year, and my instructor spent about 2 class sessions on it, so needless to say, I had no idea what I was doing. Your video did a great job to explain just what I needed to know so, thank you!

    • @joecamroberon9322
      @joecamroberon9322 5 років тому

      TheYourfaceable lol my professor spent 30 minutes on Riemann sums.

  • @wabs999
    @wabs999 11 років тому

    a whole week in class and couldnt understand this rule , yet i understood here ... thank you so much :)

  • @bodycowlin
    @bodycowlin 14 років тому

    So, I feel a little dim-witted asking this, but, the formulas you get for the summations of i and i^2, those are derived by taylor/maclaurin series right? Excellent work by the way. I've had two semesters of calc already, but they were taught by a truly rigorous professor who, although displaying a thorough knowledge of his field, I think expected to much out of his students. You do an excellent job of bringing all of this down to an earthly level.

  • @patrickjmt
    @patrickjmt  13 років тому

    @naytus thank ya

  • @rdyjur
    @rdyjur 8 років тому

    wow thanks pat, my instructor did a terrible job explaining how the lower powers within the numerators cancel out, awesome !

  • @patrickjmt
    @patrickjmt  12 років тому

    @Nedorostok glad i could help you : ) come back any time

  • @colangelog09
    @colangelog09 8 років тому +21

    1:46 *I move away from mic to cough*

    • @zain4019
      @zain4019 7 років тому +2

      colangelog09 chocolate rain!

    • @mawalamawala1730
      @mawalamawala1730 5 років тому +3

      @@zain4019 I hope you failed your calculus

  • @barbaric37
    @barbaric37 13 років тому

    I spent so much time going through this dumb concept in my book and I was so confused! but you cleared it up and helped me solve my problem, thanks!

  • @cyc.615
    @cyc.615 9 років тому +6

    you are wonderful! I just have one question. I am just learning integrals and I just want to know why we have [(n)(n+1)(2n+1)]/6. Is there a rule that I have to follow for that?

    • @Emberrs
      @Emberrs 9 років тому

      C.E.B. C. That is simply the equivalent of Riemann's sum of i^2 . Same with i^1 = [(n)(n+1)/2]

  • @perryleigh9028
    @perryleigh9028 11 років тому +1

    Thank-you This made so much more sense than when my math professor was teaching it.

  • @brianfleury979
    @brianfleury979 10 років тому +8

    This shit is so hard for a slow brained turd like myself

  • @vietgirl25
    @vietgirl25 12 років тому

    Finals week, lovin' it. Thanks Pat.

  • @LauraBayyy
    @LauraBayyy 11 років тому

    Thank you so much!! Your videos are truly helping me pass rather than fail my finals! O_o

  • @farazromani
    @farazromani 14 років тому

    Dude, you freak'n rock! Love your tutorials. They're so clear and simple. I wish you were my Calc 2 professor!

  • @HDitzzDH
    @HDitzzDH 5 років тому

    Those are some quite neat summation notations!

  • @parmida1988
    @parmida1988 11 років тому

    I LOVE the way you teach! it's super clear and I understand everything!
    THANK YOU FOR ALL OF YOUR VIDEOS AND YOUR TIME!

  • @jamessebring7136
    @jamessebring7136 7 років тому

    Patrick, first I want to say you do a superb job with your videos. Your final comment that some how by doing a page of Riemann sum formula manipulations will give the student a better understanding of the Integral is an alt fact that math professors have been using for decades to justify abusing the student with the Riemann Sum definition. First you have the x-sub i * formulas that just come out of nowhere. Then there is no referral back to the Integral method showing why the two are relative. Lastly this is why Leibnitz and Newton invented the calculus Integral because they saw the relationship and saw that by integrating each term, they did in fact get the same result. They devised the rules of integration to accomplish quickly and efficiently the Summation value. Of course the Professor's fall back is that there are functions that you cannot integrate, but what I discovered is that Riemann can't do those either.. But I appreciate your trying to make the student feel a little better about having to do Riemann Sum. Keep up the good work.

  • @xekit
    @xekit 15 років тому

    wow amazing u make understanding riemann sum alot easier than the txt book does

  • @josephtanaya
    @josephtanaya 13 років тому

    hi patrick, i have a question. it is (a+ delta x i) if it is right hand point. it is (a+ delta x (i-1)) if it is left hand point. what is it for mid point? thanks

  • @ali3ncas3
    @ali3ncas3 13 років тому

    Thank you so much, I missed a couple days of AP Calc. and couldn't figure out how they were doing theses based on my friend's notes, but you made it really easy to understand.
    Also,do you have a video on how to do this with the "short cut" using anti-derivatives?

  • @allanahk56
    @allanahk56 13 років тому

    You are a legend. Super helpful for my exam in 3 hours!

  • @cdi327
    @cdi327 10 років тому

    Wow I thought this was so hard, it's not even that bad...thanks a lot!

  • @alannamoss
    @alannamoss 13 років тому

    unfortunately my teacher is HORRIBLE at explaining things in calculus. thank you so much for posting your videos...without them i would be beyond lost. :D

  • @thetechnerdco
    @thetechnerdco 15 років тому

    Hi there. Your video greatly helped me. I have just one question. On my homework, I was asked to find the integral using Reimann's sums and with right endpoints where n=8. how would I go about doing this?

  • @Rockwell84
    @Rockwell84 13 років тому

    Just wanted to check, at 7:25 I think you meant to say you are adding those first 2 terms right?

  • @EmapMe
    @EmapMe 7 років тому

    Any more vids with examples of how to solve definite integrals using the limit of Riemann sums?

  • @kebertxela22000
    @kebertxela22000 11 років тому

    Wow, thank you so much for taking the time to explain this very thoroughly concisely! I was having such a hard time with this!!

  • @memoirist
    @memoirist 15 років тому

    thanx for the vid...it'll help me alot to pass my exams tommorrow

  • @ritvind
    @ritvind 10 років тому +1

    in 4:50, by applying lim tends to infinity, you can turn all the terms with n in the denominator to 0, leaving you with a solution of two. i dont understand why you carried on onto the next step.

    • @ifoundthewords
      @ifoundthewords 10 років тому

      The final answer isn't 2, it's 20/3.
      All the terms which had n in the denominator at 4:50 were being multiplied by terms which also had n in the numerator; if you'd turned all the terms with n in the denominator to 0, you'd be multiplying them by terms going to infinity which is indeterminate.

  • @jillm42
    @jillm42 11 років тому

    This got me through a brutal question on my Calculus final! THANK YOU!

  • @patrickjmt
    @patrickjmt  15 років тому

    nope. i have taught a top a 20 university for a few years, a community college for a few years, and two places in-between.
    i have no desire to go back into a classroom any time soon.

  • @advoconnector2131
    @advoconnector2131 11 років тому

    Thank You very much i was struggling not knowing what to do..... may the Lord richly bless You....

  • @ChaseGZ100
    @ChaseGZ100 13 років тому

    Hey, thanks a lot for the video. I only have one doubt, do you have some theory videos? like, where do you get the equivalence of i ? (i haven't checked the rest of your videos, so excuse me if the theoretical explanations are there)

  • @nedimpoyraz
    @nedimpoyraz 14 років тому

    he solved better than my teacher ,I'm gratefull.

  • @tarokobe
    @tarokobe 13 років тому

    @patrickJMT can you show an example where the exponent is not alike?

  • @wasabi5983
    @wasabi5983 12 років тому

    @7:12 can you tell me why exactly you separated the coefficient 2 from the limit of (2n³ + 3n² + n)/n³ ? Is there a specific rule that explains how it works? Could it be that we only the limit of the highest powers ?

  • @Khedr91
    @Khedr91 14 років тому

    @Zyntle ya i know what u mean, its waaaaay simpler than when lecturers say it

  • @billh1337
    @billh1337 5 років тому

    Thank you, this just helped me with my homework and my quiz due tomorrow. =)

  • @QueenV60
    @QueenV60 9 років тому

    if f is continuous on [a, b], or if f has only a finite number of jump discontinuities, then f is integrable on [a, b]; that is, the definite integral fxdx exists.
    Can anyone tell me in simpler terms what this theorem means? Thanks!

  • @samlittle510
    @samlittle510 12 років тому

    Perhaps you could break it into i and i^2 then put the two formulas into series? Just a guess though.

  • @PyjamaShark9
    @PyjamaShark9 10 років тому

    You're a lifesaver. Thank you!

  • @Koreanrocket
    @Koreanrocket 11 років тому

    if i get an i^3 and I know that the summation equivalent is [n(n+1) all over 2] squared what is the process of factoring that out?

  • @yeci09
    @yeci09 8 років тому

    Do u have a video of going from summation to integration?

  • @wesrightnow
    @wesrightnow 13 років тому

    Thank you for posting this, you're a life saver dudeman!

  • @AntoineSarhan
    @AntoineSarhan 14 років тому

    The only difference is you make the summation start at i=0 instead of i=1 and end it at n-1 instead of n.
    So the formula's will change a bit. Just make sure you minus 1 from every n!
    Example:
    Summation of i becomes (n-1)(n)/2 instead of (n)(n+1)/2

  • @tal88able
    @tal88able 8 років тому

    Extremely helpful. Thank you very much.

  • @patrickjmt
    @patrickjmt  12 років тому

    @jessiesun1142 ha! tell him / her that i said thanks for using my stuff!

  • @Natalie-fx3qy
    @Natalie-fx3qy 7 років тому

    Thx!!!!!!!!!!!! IT REALLY HELPS ME A LOT, VERY CLEAR!!!

  • @nafisa757
    @nafisa757 10 років тому

    i expand where you said we should be clever and I have a 3 constant so why you have 2 for the answer?

  • @TitusChisha-cr3kb
    @TitusChisha-cr3kb Рік тому

    U have open my mind. Thank you very much ❤❤

  • @alexville3203
    @alexville3203 12 років тому

    Thanks a lot Pat. You are amazing.

  • @ceoofnothing3211
    @ceoofnothing3211 2 роки тому +1

    I just want to know what is the point of this if we already have integrals

  • @sophc193
    @sophc193 8 років тому +1

    whoa... this is mad helpful... thank you

  • @syafiqpidoljr6230
    @syafiqpidoljr6230 8 років тому

    Sir.. May i know.. Is it i squared = n(n+1)(2n+1)/6 or n(n+1)(n+2)/6? Which is true?

  • @brittanyespinoza3668
    @brittanyespinoza3668 6 років тому

    On the second step, why skip to solve that last piece of the second step?

  • @nicoleybby
    @nicoleybby 8 років тому

    This was so helpful!!!! Thank you so much!

  • @jessestroster7687
    @jessestroster7687 6 років тому

    You are a genius. Thanks so much

  • @ikn0y0u
    @ikn0y0u 12 років тому

    Thank you so much... I almost gave up on trying to be a civil engineer

  • @patrickjmt
    @patrickjmt  13 років тому

    @barbaric37 come back any time! : )

  • @abdullahsumait7750
    @abdullahsumait7750 8 років тому

    I dont know what to tell but thank you so much!!

  • @odinheim
    @odinheim 14 років тому

    @dgizowski Thanks for comments definitely one of the best videos of Parick
    I give 5 starts

  • @Habibgailan
    @Habibgailan 3 роки тому

    Thanks for the help!

  • @AddisonSalzman
    @AddisonSalzman 12 років тому

    Great video! Thanks for the help!

  • @midnull
    @midnull 10 років тому

    OMG thank you! you made this super easy!

  • @ken8844
    @ken8844 8 років тому

    How do you find the lower estimate?

  • @rishabhsharma1982
    @rishabhsharma1982 2 роки тому

    Awesome video, thanks!

  • @kim2662315
    @kim2662315 10 років тому

    Thankyou so much, you're amazing ♡ needed this for my ap m

  • @MrPoutsesMple
    @MrPoutsesMple 9 років тому

    This is lovely. Thanks a lots !

  • @ran6257260
    @ran6257260 14 років тому

    This is reall helpful. Thank You :)

  • @adityaadit2004
    @adityaadit2004 4 роки тому

    how do you find the formula at 3:37 ?
    I don't get that part

  • @7ozzz7
    @7ozzz7 12 років тому

    how did u get the (n)(n+1) and (n)(n+1)(2n+1)

  • @iUTKNi
    @iUTKNi 14 років тому

    Thank you!

  • @apalahubog
    @apalahubog 13 років тому

    Thank you

  • @cesium8857
    @cesium8857 3 роки тому

    thank you so much!