Wow! Great documentary! New footage, (which I didn’t think possible) good commentators (interesting and give good narration) so just when I think I know everything about this clash, you folks introduce additional facts. This documentary is awesome! Great job y’all!
Stalin did read Mein Kampf, and he listened. In a speech to managers of socialist industry in 1931, Stalin stated that: “We are fifty or a hundred years behind the advanced countries. We must make good this distance in ten years. Either we do it, or they crush us. This is what our obligations to the workers and peasants of the U.S.S.R. dictate to us”.
In 6:54 is a mistake, it was not a simultaneous attack on Poland. Stalin shifted the attack 17 days (so 17.09.1939) as he wanted to be sure what France and England will do. They did nothing so he benefited from the situation.
I mean, it didn't seem farfetched that Germany could defeat the Soviet Union in 1941, and pretty much all Western observers also expected that to happen considering that Stalin's purges had stripped the Red Army of many, MANY experienced and talented officers at all levels and left it in a very weakened and disorganized state. The stunning victory over France in just 6 weeks, which on paper had the largest and most powerful military in Europe seemed to suggest that Russia would fare no better. The one thing that Hitler did NOT consider, however, was how many divisions the Soviets could conjure up as if out of thin air and the number of tanks they possessed, more specifically the KV-1 and T-34. In fact, after the start of Operation Barbarossa when the true scale of Soviet armored strength became known, Hitler actually admitted to General Bock that “Had I known they had as many tanks as that, I'd have thought twice before invading.”
It was possible, but only if a few things had panned out differently - even then it was a mammoth task and huge risk. Barbarossa was delayed because of the Italians coming unstuck in Greece; had that not been the case, Barbarossa wouldn’t have been delayed for over a month! Also, if the Japanese chose to invade the Siberian Far East, the Red Army wouldn’t have been able to transfer so many reinforcements from its eastern borders, including the hardened veterans that were well-trained for winter combat; however, the actual effect this would’ve had on the Moscow front is up for debate. Lastly, maybe if Germany had embraced their warm welcome as ‘liberators’ from the people of their newly-conquered eastern territories, instead of behaving like butchers, not as many would’ve chosen to join the partisan movement which constantly plagued the Wehrmacht and delayed their advance into the USSR.
The secret recording with Mannerheim in 1942/43, he said had he know that they had 30,000 tanks, it would have made his decision to invade all the more difficult, but he would still have made the decision to invade
Japan failed to declare war on Russia. After that the Russians had the Siberian railway. And could transfer fresh troops to Moscow that had guarded against Japan. Hitler deluded himself, thinking he could do what Napoleon faild to do. Consolidate himself in Russia. And win a decisive victory. Madness. I mean, compare it to France; there they drove the British to sea. lieratally, whereas the russians had every opportunity to retreat, if need be,all the way to the Pacific, conducting partisan operations at the same time, which they did, creating havoc from time to time. In the occupied territories.
They also invaded while using actual horses. They wanted to invade over a land area larger than western Europe using horses to transport supplies. It is, without a doubt, one of the dumbest decisions anyone in history could make. They had very little oil and no way to support such an invasion. The nazis were good at attacking nations with very little in the way of an organized defense. Their victories were over a demoralized France that didn't expect the nazi army to invade a neutral nation in Belgium and go around the French defense and that's it. The moment they encountered a nation that they didn't commit war crimes to get a surprise attack on the capital, they failed completely.
In Mein Kampf : Volume 2, Chapter 14: Hitler dedicates the entire chapter for his plans for Russia, he makes it clear that Russia is ripe for colonization and its people are to be enslaved and used by the German masters.
Obsession or not, Barbarossa was the only viable alternative open to Hitler after Britain refused to negotiate. Barbarossa was the only option which offered any prospect of alleviating Germany's dire raw material situation on a permanent basis. Simply put, Germany was strapped for raw materials of all kinds years before the war even broke out, and the Soviet Union was the only place which had them. Britain certainly did not, which was the primary reason why the naval war against Britain was a dead end for Germany.
@@priatalat The Soviets were supplying the Germans for no other reason than to buy time, as they were in the middle of a transformation of their army after their debacle in Finland. Stalin is moreover on record as stating that they (the Russians) might be able to postpone a war with Germany until 1942 or 1943- and that he intended that the Soviet Union would enter the war as the last participant who would trip the scales. Lastly- a close examination of the trade provisions of the Nazi- Soviet Non- Aggression Pact will show that it was the Soviets who consistently benefitted from that pact. In fact, the head of the German economics and armaments office stated that "The conclusion of this pact has saved Germany."
@@manilajohn0182 Germans could get these raw materials anywhere and they get later on a lot of oil from Romania. Saying Barbarrosa was for raw materials is na absurd. This was for destroying communist country believed to be a threat for a reason.
@@WielkaStopa-qh1rr I'm sorry, but that's incorrect. The oil fields at Ploesti never provided the petroleum in the quantity that the Germans required, and synthetic production never came close to filling the gap. Moreover, the Germans were strapped for bauxite, chromium, copper, manganese, rubber, and high- grade iron ore (to name just a few) starting in late 1936- and they weren't just "anywhere". While Barbarossa took place for a number of reasons, economic (and ideological) factors were paramount. See the multi- volume series "Germany and the Second World War". Since this series is expensive, see also "The Wages of Destruction", "Feeding the German Eagle", and "Documents on Nazism" for documentation regarding this issue.
@@manilajohn0182 never for full demand but always as maximal support. and anywhere is anywhere until allies are not raiding neutral ships. adolf explained to germans how he is rational about stalingard that is a plenty of materials but lets dont pretend how in european part of russia he could gain some rubber etc, especially while in war soviet get a plenty materials for themselves (not just some aluminium)
You should do one about the soviet attack theory. It was very well described by Suvorov and Solonin. The two regimes simply could not live together in the same system and war was inevitable.
That theory is a myth. Any such Russian offensive required objectives- tactical, operational, and strategic. Those objectives- airfields, factories, tank parks, HQs, and the like- required identification by the Russians so that they could be targeted for destruction. They ranged from a few miles to a few hundred miles behind the main line of resistance. Any of them immediately behind the front would have to be reconnoitered by ground forces stealthily crossing the border. Any of them not immediately behind the front had to be detected by short and long- range reconnaissance aircraft. This 'had' to be done, or any such Russian invasion of German territory would have been that of a blind man stabbing in the dark. The Germans did this to the Russians in the months prior to Barbarossa, and the Russians recorded cross border violations by small groups of armed men as well as an abnormally large number of violations of their airspace. 'No' such Russian violations of German airspace were recorded by the Germans in the months prior to Barbarossa- nor were any cross border violations by Russian ground forces noted. Stalin is on record however, as saying that the Soviet Union 'might' be prepared to enter the war in the 1943 time frame, 'as the last power which would tilt the scales'. In June of 1941 however, the Soviet Ground Forces were in the midst of a massive reorganization which stemmed from: 1) their lamentable performance on Finland, and; 2) the stunning Germany victory in France and the low countries.
@dragosz19834ghds Yes, I'm familiar with them and have read 'some' of their work. Their theory nevertheless falls short for the reasons which I mentioned- specifically, a complete lack of pre- invasion reconnaissance by the Russians.
@@manilajohn0182 you are aware of the fact that russian troops captured by germans had maps of polish terrritories ? And most important they did not have maps of soviet territories which they were supposed to defend ? In "some" of their work you will have ample evidence and sources used to document this. Also the russians had ample spy networks all over eastern europe, access to western intelligence, they penetrated the german armed forces with many spies (The red orchestra) and did not need to fly over the german airspace to gather the informations they needed.
@@manilajohn0182 you are aware of the fact that russian troops captured by germans had maps of polish terrritories ? And most important they did not have maps of soviet territories which they were supposed to defend ? In "some" of their work you will have ample evidence and sources used to document this. Also the russians had ample spy networks all over eastern europe, access to western intelligence, they penetrated the german armed forces with many spies (The red orchestra) and did not need to fly over the german airspace to gather the informations they needed.
Stalin and Hitler…two of a kind. No one ever looks back to history for answers today. I’m fascinated by the European Theater of WWII, so thanks for the interesting video. I can’t bear to read or watch about the Pacific Theater…my dad fought there.
It is hardly ever noted that when Hitler invaded Poland, so did the Russians. The Russians and Germany had an agreement to divide Poland. Yet, it was Germany’s invasion of Poland that started World War II. The invasion of Poland by Germany was the red line for Britain and France. But Britain and France never declared war on the USSR. On one level I get it but at the same time I don’t. Both the NAZI’s and the Communists were despicable and a horror. Both needed to be destroyed. Patton was right about going after the communists in Russia. But the Cold War eventually destroyed the USSR. What is even more crazy is how America and other democracies have empowered the Chinese communists since the USSR imploded. That was dumb on a scale that cannot be charted.
@ Stalin and Hitler had split Poland between them when they signed the non-aggression pact. When Hitler launched Operation Barbarossa, the German Army went right through the part that had been allocated to the Russians on their way to Russia. The Russians didn’t come through Poland until they were driving the Germans west to Berlin.
Poland was not an innocent player. Soviet Union didn’t invade Poland, but only took back its territory belong to Russia. The west was more fond of Nazis instead
Everyone repeats the decisive effect of winter, but no one mentions that this was due to the decisive delay caused to the Germans by the unplanned months-long war in Greece.
Two unmentioned factors greatly affected Hitler's campaign. 1) The two-month delay due to the stupidity of Mussolini who thought of attacking a pro-Nazi Greece, forcing the Germans into a war in the south that they wanted to avoid. 2) The American aid which was enormous
Max Hastings, (light gray sweater,) seems to be rather uninformed. He believes that the German military always knew that they couldn’t win in Russia and that it was Hitler alone who wanted to invade. He repeats this in different ways throughout the video. However, this is not accurate.
@ Not only that. Very few Western historians actually know what happened in the first weeks of the war in the Soviet military and political leadership. There is a certain paradigm about the so-called collapse of the Soviet military-political leadership, but that is not true at all. Barbarossa and the Eastern Front in general looks somewhat different from the Soviet perspective.
Your documentary should include more information about large-scale Soviet counterattacks, featuring armored forces, launched against the invading forces very early in the campaign--and not just stubborn resistance by small groups. Also, Hitler's weakening of the central advance to assist the assault on Kiev, where things were moving more slowly up to that time.
Winston Churchill's "The Second World War" does not use the term "Holocaust" directly, as the term had not yet come into general use at the time he wrote his memoirs.
In Kursk, 1943 war was decided. Germany lost 800.000 well trained veterans in 1941 and the rest died in Stalingrad at 42. Check petrol production, weapons, tanks from from Soviet Union , America and England . In the other side Italy, Japan and Germany Germany couldn’t win, they had only one chance in 1941 …..
The "Barbarossa Unleashed" video is not just about a military operation, but also a depiction of an ideology, a personal obsession, and the mistakes that led to historical changes on a global scale. It explains how Hitler's decision to launch Barbarossa caused catastrophe not only for the German people and the Soviet Union but for the entire world. The video also serves as an exceptional source for learning history and drawing lessons from such mistakes.
@@oO-_-_-_-Oo Yikes, it would be better if they did not commit genocide against the indegenious Palestinians. But hey, if you live in Europe long enough you eventually think that colonization is ok.
you don't need to know about that! you have to think that Russia was always a villain! that's how propaganda works. Russia is always bad. Russia became an empire because of the wars it waged on others and so on. but it's completely different with USA and Great Britain! they became great empires because they always did good things to other countries, other nations and other races! and also you don't need to know about how stalin tried to create a military alliance with france and great britain againts germany to protect checoslovakia and later poland but they all refused to make soviet union an ally and only after that, when hitler approached stalin that molotov-ribentrop pact was signed. here's what chatgpt says about that: ChatGPT 4 | Midjourney | Claude | Suno, [11/13/24 9:48 PM] Yes, the Soviet Union negotiated with England and France about the possible conclusion of a military alliance against Nazi Germany before the takeover of Czechoslovakia. In the late 1930s, the situation in Europe was becoming increasingly tense, and the countries of Western Europe recognized the need to unite efforts to counter Nazi Germany. However, the negotiations for a military alliance between the Soviet Union, England, and France were unsuccessful due to disagreements and mistrust among the parties. As a result, in March 1939, Germany annexed Czechoslovakia, which became a catalyst for the signing of the Munich Agreement between England, France, Italy, and Germany, granting Hitler part of Czechoslovakia's territory. After the Munich Agreement, the Soviet Union began active measures to ensure its security and signed a non-aggression pact with Nazi Germany (the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact). Yes, in 1939, the Soviet Union proposed to Poland to conclude an agreement on mutual assistance and a military alliance for collective defense against Nazi Germany. According to this proposal, the Soviet Union wanted to station its troops on Polish territory for defense in the event of a German attack on Poland as well as in the event of a German attack on the Soviet Union. However, the Polish government rejected this proposal and did not agree to the deployment of Soviet troops on its territory. As a result, when Germany invaded Poland on September 1, 1939, the Soviet Union did not enter the war on Poland's side; instead, it signed a non-aggression pact with Germany (the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact), which provided for the division of Poland between the two countries. you should read history books before watching these documentaries because almost all of them are biased to one side or the other. russian documentaries are biased in favor of russia, and american/european documentaries are biased i favor of usa/europe... it's always been like that, since the cold war. it never really stopped. putin said about this, that usa and europe are rewriting history on their favor. but nobody cared about that and now they're doing the same thing in russia. it's a fucked up planet...
Correct. The Soviets invaded Poland 2 weeks after Germany. Interestingly, the Soviets invaded Finland, Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, and Moldavia all on their own before Germany invaded France.
Молотов почти в ничем не ошибся в докладе начала программы. Якова пленили. Планы разгрома Франции осмыслил Манштейн. И Тимошенко был маршал тогда командовал западным направлением. Черчилль очень забавно отозвался насчет неосведомленности Гитлера касательно русской зимы. -13° теплее чем -15° Тактика Японии былф ждать и смотреть,они ждали взятие Москвы. Битва за Москву не только симболическая победа. Япония потерпела поражение в "39-м на Халхин -Голе,а в "45-м в Маньчжурии. Москва -это твердь от которю разбился в прах миф о непобедимости немецкой армии. Сталин тоже в битве за Москву направлял действия каждой роты.
I would be curious as to know why the Allies thought Stalin & Co would be defeated even up to 43 . It sounds as if the Germans had done better than reported .
Barbarosa was late due to Mussolini's invasion of Greece, which infuriated Hitler who now had to rescue his ally. And Hitler's patience with Stalin's double-dealing finally ended with the Danube Conference. More importantly, Hitler's biological clock was ticking. He knew he only had so much time of good health to launch his attack against Russia. It was Hitler's fear of failing health that spurred him to open a second front when he did. This example of a leader making historic decisions of war based almost entirely on his personal health should not be discounted when looking at China's Xi and his ambitions on Taiwan. Xi is 71 years old.
Shortly after his stunning victory at Austerlitz in1805, Napoleon commented that he only had a few good campaigning years left in him. I don't much like comparing the two leaders, but both were acutely aware of the relationship between their physical health and their ability to perform. I don't know if bailing out Mussolini much affected the start of Barbarossa. In USSR the Spring floods were still very much an issue along the intended lines of advance and the Germans knew they had to wait for them to subside, to avoid a quagmire from the outset.
If I had been a Soviet soldier defending Stalingrad, I believe I would have been certain I'd have been shot by my own side for inefficiency or treason if the Germans had captured the city and I somehow managed to survive the German onslaught.
14:45 the other way of looking at it is that the revolutionary movement had defeated the liberal bourgeois element leadership and had to keep going to protect the revolution and defend the motherland
Historian Ian Kershaw writes in his definitive two volume Hitler biography (Hubris/Nemesis) that, unlike what this third rate documentary claims, not only Hitler but most of his generals genuinely believed that the Soviet Union could be defeated within a couple of months, and in the worst case before winter. Therefore Barbarossa was not a result of Hitler's miscalculation, it was a result of consensus among Germany's best strategists, who happened to be all wrong.
Why do you always blurr out images that are part of history? The truth is the truth. If those images are concerning to you then you might as well do documentarys about home cooking or something.
You heard the German historian correct?...when he said German generals knew that even if the Luftwaffe had have won the Battle of Britain then invasion over the Dover Strait and Nazi victory over Britain would still not have been possible...That being the case which it certainly is given that no ariel battle in history has ever precluded victory over an invasion...So just what was the point of the so-called Battle of Britain and cant you see that there's definitely something else going on here?
całe niemcy miały taką obsesję, i nie bez powodu. po przgranej wojnie z utratą ziem, po walkach w kraju, po wieściach o krawaym bolszewizmie i jego rewolucyjnym pochodzie, po tym jak stalinisci szykowali wojsko kosztem umierających z głodu.
Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan shared three common characteristics, they were both industrial juggernauts, devoid of the natural resources to sustain it, and went to war with the only two nations that had the natural resources they desperately need, Russia (USSR) and the USA. Germany’s military machine would not have survived without Russian oil, gas, and metals, that is why he invaded.😊
Celo njegovo ratovanje je bilo najobicnije kockanje,sa onim sto je imao je postigao max ciljeve,resursi ekonomski i ljudski su isli debelo na Hitlerovu stetu,rat nikada nije mogao da dobije,jednostavno to brojevi proizvedenih tenkova,aviona govore
Perhaps after centuries we will learn the real truth - if we ever learn it. At this time, we live in the ideological antithesis of what Germany was striving for at that time, so history as it is presented today is not impartial.
the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact of non-aggression in 1939; Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggressuon Pact; Lebensraum; room to live; living space; Hitler's 1812: "I've not been defeated by the Russian generals," Napoleon said. "I've defeated by Gen. Winter" Kaiser Hitler;
Some facts. At 22 june Soviet Army on the border between Russian and Germany was twise much bigger then Hitler Amy, 7-8 time more tanks, 8-10 time more aircrafts, more gans. Dictator Stalin was sure in victory. He planed offensive and was not ready to deffensive! Hitler also was sure in victory and did not want to divide win with Japan. Russian paid close to 30 million killed (USA less than 400 thousends) for winning Germany!!!
@@jeffreyval9665 western propaganda garbage. It is well known Churchill was planning an invasion of Soviet Union right after end of WWII in Europe, that is the truth.
@@manilajohn0182 I believe that nearly all countries exhibit patriotism when they are at war. I remember during the Gulf War there were American flags everywhere. I don’t think it is simple minded to support your country in a time of war.
Why is no one conveying that we had their military communication & could control weather since late 1930’s. Do you truly believe December 5th going -40 degrees was by mere chance?
Okay but look at the general weather in December for the last 100 years of that area + they're still unprepared and don't have a system in place logistically to supply their troops with necessities to continue effectively. Look at the land distance + issues with different train track size + infrastructure issues. Yeah they at some point were like "ok supply by air drops" - and that didn't work out either. Everything was based on hope +force of willpower and essentially delusional clinging to denial from there forward... 😂 Hitler did it to himself and didn't really want to listen to much of what he didn't want to hear. Worked out great 😊
Berperang melawan kezaliman dan pelaku-pelaku pembuat kebohongan, munafik dan pelaku-pelaku pemecah belah hubungan baik cinta satu rumah keluarga kandung (Ayah kandung, Ibu kandung, Anak kandung) dan maling harta benda hak milik yang sebenarnya contoh harta benda hak milik kedua orang tua kandung saya. Suatu negara jika dikuasai pelaku-pelaku penyalahgunaan kekuasaan (dengan harta bendanya) jadinya seperti Indonesia semenjak krisis moneter 1998 Indonesia berada di bawah setara dengan negara-negara tetangga, nilai tukar (mata uang) 1 Dollar setara 15000 Rupiah lebih, dan harga-harga dalam negeri Indonesia semakin mahal.
А каква е манията на Путин? Моля,разкажете повече¿ Според скромното ми мнение,той е опасен за Русия. Според водещи психиатри. Човека се е объркал,какво толкова. Случвало се е и предѝ.
It stuns me when after becoming master of the ehole of Europe Napoleon eent in to Russia snd was destroyed that Germany and today NATO think they can just march in to Russia and survive. All the russians have to do is keep the enemy out of the toens and cities until winter and watch them freeze. Minus ,40 to 60 degrees isn't a temperature thst most counties are accustomed to.
@@SantiagoVeraLoor NATO isn't marching into Russia and doesn't want to. Russia also isn't keen to march into NATO territory, either. This isn't in dispute or misunderstood by those in power. It's the border regions that are scrutinized.
Pocas veces he visto un documental con las enormes incoherencias de los comentaristas (NO analistas) que aquí intervienen. Tal vez como documento de propaganda anglosajona permita explicar los absurdos razonamientos de los comentaristas. Pésimo documento
так Курляндскую губерния куда входили в последствии Литва, Эстония и Латвия царь Петр первый в 1712 году купил у скандинавов за полторы тонны серебра. так что они по праву принадлежат России. В архивах хранятся документы этой купли-продажи .
А где по твоей версии была великое княжество Литовское?Скандинавия владела финами,но Литва им никогда не принадлежала и перешла в Российскую империю после третьего раздела Речьпосполиты в 1795 году.
Wow! Great documentary! New footage, (which I didn’t think possible) good commentators (interesting and give good narration) so just when I think I know everything about this clash, you folks introduce additional facts. This documentary is awesome! Great job y’all!
Hitler spelled it all out in Mein Kampf years before. Even Stalin read it. But nobody listened.
Spot on. They recharacterise it as an anti jew polemic now.
yep...i learned that in 8th grade
yep the Austrian painter with the tiny moustache was right after all.
Stalin did read Mein Kampf, and he listened. In a speech to managers of socialist industry in 1931, Stalin stated that: “We are fifty or a hundred years behind the advanced countries. We must make good this distance in ten years. Either we do it, or they crush us. This is what our obligations to the workers and peasants of the U.S.S.R. dictate to us”.
@@manilajohn0182 These people don't want you to shatter their delusions about Stalin by presenting pesky facts like that. They want their caricature.
WW2 is endlessly fascinating.
"War makes rattling good history, but peace is poor reading"- Thomas Hardy
only EU part, Asian not fascinating, because Asian all poor country, no modern weapon to beat Japan
Couldn't agree more!
@@Russian382 Naval battles are very interesting so I love reading about the Pacific, but it became very one-sided after the Zero became outdated
I never get tired of it.
In 6:54 is a mistake, it was not a simultaneous attack on Poland. Stalin shifted the attack 17 days (so 17.09.1939) as he wanted to be sure what France and England will do. They did nothing so he benefited from the situation.
No Comrade Stalin waited so he would not be accused of starting the war. he was clever that German FURRER.
Gerçek görüntülerin kullanılması seyir zevkini yükseltiyor. Türkçe alt yazı desteği için teşekkür ederim 🙏🙏
😊
Her 100 ildən bir bir qatil çıxar və insanliqi mef edər..... Napolyon, Hitler, Stalin.... İndi də Putin.
I mean, it didn't seem farfetched that Germany could defeat the Soviet Union in 1941, and pretty much all Western observers also expected that to happen considering that Stalin's purges had stripped the Red Army of many, MANY experienced and talented officers at all levels and left it in a very weakened and disorganized state. The stunning victory over France in just 6 weeks, which on paper had the largest and most powerful military in Europe seemed to suggest that Russia would fare no better. The one thing that Hitler did NOT consider, however, was how many divisions the Soviets could conjure up as if out of thin air and the number of tanks they possessed, more specifically the KV-1 and T-34. In fact, after the start of Operation Barbarossa when the true scale of Soviet armored strength became known, Hitler actually admitted to General Bock that “Had I known they had as many tanks as that, I'd have thought twice before invading.”
A fatal miscalculation.
It was possible, but only if a few things had panned out differently - even then it was a mammoth task and huge risk. Barbarossa was delayed because of the Italians coming unstuck in Greece; had that not been the case, Barbarossa wouldn’t have been delayed for over a month! Also, if the Japanese chose to invade the Siberian Far East, the Red Army wouldn’t have been able to transfer so many reinforcements from its eastern borders, including the hardened veterans that were well-trained for winter combat; however, the actual effect this would’ve had on the Moscow front is up for debate. Lastly, maybe if Germany had embraced their warm welcome as ‘liberators’ from the people of their newly-conquered eastern territories, instead of behaving like butchers, not as many would’ve chosen to join the partisan movement which constantly plagued the Wehrmacht and delayed their advance into the USSR.
The secret recording with Mannerheim in 1942/43, he said had he know that they had 30,000 tanks, it would have made his decision to invade all the more difficult, but he would still have made the decision to invade
Japan failed to declare war on Russia. After that the Russians had the Siberian railway. And could transfer fresh troops to Moscow that had guarded against Japan. Hitler deluded himself, thinking he could do what Napoleon faild to do. Consolidate himself in Russia. And win a decisive victory. Madness. I mean, compare it to France; there they drove the British to sea. lieratally, whereas the russians had every opportunity to retreat, if need be,all the way to the Pacific, conducting partisan operations at the same time, which they did, creating havoc from time to time. In the occupied territories.
They also invaded while using actual horses. They wanted to invade over a land area larger than western Europe using horses to transport supplies.
It is, without a doubt, one of the dumbest decisions anyone in history could make. They had very little oil and no way to support such an invasion. The nazis were good at attacking nations with very little in the way of an organized defense. Their victories were over a demoralized France that didn't expect the nazi army to invade a neutral nation in Belgium and go around the French defense and that's it.
The moment they encountered a nation that they didn't commit war crimes to get a surprise attack on the capital, they failed completely.
In Mein Kampf : Volume 2, Chapter 14: Hitler dedicates the entire chapter for his plans for Russia, he makes it clear that Russia is ripe for colonization and its people are to be enslaved and used by the German masters.
At the end its Germany people become slaves of Russians
sounds very brtish of him lol
looking forward to episode 2
Obsession or not, Barbarossa was the only viable alternative open to Hitler after Britain refused to negotiate. Barbarossa was the only option which offered any prospect of alleviating Germany's dire raw material situation on a permanent basis. Simply put, Germany was strapped for raw materials of all kinds years before the war even broke out, and the Soviet Union was the only place which had them. Britain certainly did not, which was the primary reason why the naval war against Britain was a dead end for Germany.
Not true, the Soviet Union was
eagerly still supplying Germany. And they would’ve continued to for the foreseeable future.
@@priatalat The Soviets were supplying the Germans for no other reason than to buy time, as they were in the middle of a transformation of their army after their debacle in Finland. Stalin is moreover on record as stating that they (the Russians) might be able to postpone a war with Germany until 1942 or 1943- and that he intended that the Soviet Union would enter the war as the last participant who would trip the scales. Lastly- a close examination of the trade provisions of the Nazi- Soviet Non- Aggression Pact will show that it was the Soviets who consistently benefitted from that pact. In fact, the head of the German economics and armaments office stated that "The conclusion of this pact has saved Germany."
@@manilajohn0182 Germans could get these raw materials anywhere and they get later on a lot of oil from Romania. Saying Barbarrosa was for raw materials is na absurd. This was for destroying communist country believed to be a threat for a reason.
@@WielkaStopa-qh1rr I'm sorry, but that's incorrect. The oil fields at Ploesti never provided the petroleum in the quantity that the Germans required, and synthetic production never came close to filling the gap. Moreover, the Germans were strapped for bauxite, chromium, copper, manganese, rubber, and high- grade iron ore (to name just a few) starting in late 1936- and they weren't just "anywhere". While Barbarossa took place for a number of reasons, economic (and ideological) factors were paramount. See the multi- volume series "Germany and the Second World War". Since this series is expensive, see also "The Wages of Destruction", "Feeding the German Eagle", and "Documents on Nazism" for documentation regarding this issue.
@@manilajohn0182 never for full demand but always as maximal support. and anywhere is anywhere until allies are not raiding neutral ships. adolf explained to germans how he is rational about stalingard that is a plenty of materials but lets dont pretend how in european part of russia he could gain some rubber etc, especially while in war soviet get a plenty materials for themselves (not just some aluminium)
You should do one about the soviet attack theory. It was very well described by Suvorov and Solonin. The two regimes simply could not live together in the same system and war was inevitable.
That theory is a myth. Any such Russian offensive required objectives- tactical, operational, and strategic. Those objectives- airfields, factories, tank parks, HQs, and the like- required identification by the Russians so that they could be targeted for destruction. They ranged from a few miles to a few hundred miles behind the main line of resistance. Any of them immediately behind the front would have to be reconnoitered by ground forces stealthily crossing the border. Any of them not immediately behind the front had to be detected by short and long- range reconnaissance aircraft. This 'had' to be done, or any such Russian invasion of German territory would have been that of a blind man stabbing in the dark. The Germans did this to the Russians in the months prior to Barbarossa, and the Russians recorded cross border violations by small groups of armed men as well as an abnormally large number of violations of their airspace. 'No' such Russian violations of German airspace were recorded by the Germans in the months prior to Barbarossa- nor were any cross border violations by Russian ground forces noted.
Stalin is on record however, as saying that the Soviet Union 'might' be prepared to enter the war in the 1943 time frame, 'as the last power which would tilt the scales'. In June of 1941 however, the Soviet Ground Forces were in the midst of a massive reorganization which stemmed from: 1) their lamentable performance on Finland, and; 2) the stunning Germany victory in France and the low countries.
@manilajohn0182 have you read the authors i mentioned?
@dragosz19834ghds Yes, I'm familiar with them and have read 'some' of their work. Their theory nevertheless falls short for the reasons which I mentioned- specifically, a complete lack of pre- invasion reconnaissance by the Russians.
@@manilajohn0182 you are aware of the fact that russian troops captured by germans had maps of polish terrritories ? And most important they did not have maps of soviet territories which they were supposed to defend ? In "some" of their work you will have ample evidence and sources used to document this. Also the russians had ample spy networks all over eastern europe, access to western intelligence, they penetrated the german armed forces with many spies (The red orchestra) and did not need to fly over the german airspace to gather the informations they needed.
@@manilajohn0182 you are aware of the fact that russian troops captured by germans had maps of polish terrritories ? And most important they did not have maps of soviet territories which they were supposed to defend ? In "some" of their work you will have ample evidence and sources used to document this. Also the russians had ample spy networks all over eastern europe, access to western intelligence, they penetrated the german armed forces with many spies (The red orchestra) and did not need to fly over the german airspace to gather the informations they needed.
Many shots are blurred and blocked out. Not interested to watch censored content is already approved scenes from chronicles.
Have to censor everything now , you are not to see or hear , robot
I gotta say I'm watching this again. This is the best documentary of the war in Russia I've seen.
Outstanding work guys..job well done
I have Beevor's book, the Battle of Berlin 1945, well worth a read.
Stalin and Hitler…two of a kind. No one ever looks back to history for answers today. I’m fascinated by the European Theater of WWII, so thanks for the interesting video. I can’t bear to read or watch about the Pacific Theater…my dad fought there.
It is hardly ever noted that when Hitler invaded Poland, so did the Russians. The Russians and Germany had an agreement to divide Poland. Yet, it was Germany’s invasion of Poland that started World War II. The invasion of Poland by Germany was the red line for Britain and France. But Britain and France never declared war on the USSR. On one level I get it but at the same time I don’t. Both the NAZI’s and the Communists were despicable and a horror. Both needed to be destroyed. Patton was right about going after the communists in Russia. But the Cold War eventually destroyed the USSR. What is even more crazy is how America and other democracies have empowered the Chinese communists since the USSR imploded. That was dumb on a scale that cannot be charted.
@ Stalin and Hitler had split Poland between them when they signed the non-aggression pact. When Hitler launched Operation Barbarossa, the German Army went right through the part that had been allocated to the Russians on their way to Russia. The Russians didn’t come through Poland until they were driving the Germans west to Berlin.
Poland was not an innocent player. Soviet Union didn’t invade Poland, but only took back its territory belong to Russia. The west was more fond of Nazis instead
Just wish we learn something from all this horror??? Great Channel!!
Everyone repeats the decisive effect of winter, but no one mentions that this was due to the decisive delay caused to the Germans by the unplanned months-long war in Greece.
And Yugoslavia.
the winter had to come anyway
@@TonyMichaels166yes🇬🇷🇬🇷🇬🇷
and probably it was also due to the red army actually fighting the germans and not giving up like french and pommies did!
Przygotowania do kampanii w Grecji rozpoczęły się w listopadzie 1940 r. Plan przygotowany był już w marcu 1941 . Źródło: A. Bevor "II Wojna Światowa"
Very good documentary
Life isn’t a chessboard.. remember that.
Rumor has it that he expected it to be over in three days.
Such ironic echoes...
Not three days, but three months.
Don't pixel out the video.
UA-cam will demonetize them if they do
UA-cam guidelines ... even though I pay for premium & I'm of age
Two unmentioned factors greatly affected Hitler's campaign. 1) The two-month delay due to the stupidity of Mussolini who thought of attacking a pro-Nazi Greece, forcing the Germans into a war in the south that they wanted to avoid. 2) The American aid which was enormous
Many inaccuracies in this video. However, many good informations as well.
Max Hastings, (light gray sweater,) seems to be rather uninformed. He believes that the German military always knew that they couldn’t win in Russia and that it was Hitler alone who wanted to invade. He repeats this in different ways throughout the video. However, this is not accurate.
@ Not only that. Very few Western historians actually know what happened in the first weeks of the war in the Soviet military and political leadership. There is a certain paradigm about the so-called collapse of the Soviet military-political leadership, but that is not true at all. Barbarossa and the Eastern Front in general looks somewhat different from the Soviet perspective.
How so? The Nazis were bering down on the leaderless Russian army. They were a real threat to overthrow Moscow. Hitler screwed it up, fortunately.
Grr why are you using a post WW2 map & not the map as of 09/01/1939?
Your documentary should include more information about large-scale Soviet counterattacks, featuring armored forces, launched against the invading forces very early in the campaign--and not just stubborn resistance by small groups. Also, Hitler's weakening of the central advance to assist the assault on Kiev, where things were moving more slowly up to that time.
Sir Richard Evans rocks!!
Keep in mind that Churchill's book
"The History of the Second War" does not mention the Holocaust....
Winston Churchill's "The Second World War" does not use the term "Holocaust" directly, as the term had not yet come into general use at the time he wrote his memoirs.
@ always an excuse
@@uygiygvutvutc Bull!
@@Buddy-holly1 cmon dude,he was anti semetic but he certainly didnt want anyone killed because they were a jew,holy hell man
@@Buddy-holly1so you know the inner agenda in all its various forms in history.
I would argue that the battle of Kursk was the turning point in the war.
In Kursk, 1943 war was decided. Germany lost 800.000 well trained veterans in 1941 and the rest died in Stalingrad at 42. Check petrol production, weapons, tanks from from Soviet Union , America and England . In the other side Italy, Japan and Germany
Germany couldn’t win, they had only one chance in 1941 …..
The "Barbarossa Unleashed" video is not just about a military operation, but also a depiction of an ideology, a personal obsession, and the mistakes that led to historical changes on a global scale. It explains how Hitler's decision to launch Barbarossa caused catastrophe not only for the German people and the Soviet Union but for the entire world. The video also serves as an exceptional source for learning history and drawing lessons from such mistakes.
3.09.1039. was obvious he has to loose so the est was just a consequences with very little choice
will History repat itself . We are already seeing the Hall Marks. Anyway excellent documentary .
how? please,elaborate
Yes, the writing's on the wall. Like Hall Marks.
Israel will be just fine, don't worry, DJT will see to it.
(or wait, you were thinking....)
@@oO-_-_-_-Oo
Yikes, it would be better if they did not commit genocide against the indegenious Palestinians. But hey, if you live in Europe long enough you eventually think that colonization is ok.
@@Swellington_wait n c ,,,,,, to many greedy people for this small world ,,bud 😢👍
What is blurred out in the film?
Operation Barbarossa. Hitler wanted more, that was his downfall. Fatal mistake. Tanks could not survive the brutal Siberian winter.
Germany and the Soviet Union did not simultaneously invade Poland
you don't need to know about that! you have to think that Russia was always a villain! that's how propaganda works. Russia is always bad. Russia became an empire because of the wars it waged on others and so on. but it's completely different with USA and Great Britain! they became great empires because they always did good things to other countries, other nations and other races! and also you don't need to know about how stalin tried to create a military alliance with france and great britain againts germany to protect checoslovakia and later poland but they all refused to make soviet union an ally and only after that, when hitler approached stalin that molotov-ribentrop pact was signed. here's what chatgpt says about that:
ChatGPT 4 | Midjourney | Claude | Suno, [11/13/24 9:48 PM]
Yes, the Soviet Union negotiated with England and France about the possible conclusion of a military alliance against Nazi Germany before the takeover of Czechoslovakia. In the late 1930s, the situation in Europe was becoming increasingly tense, and the countries of Western Europe recognized the need to unite efforts to counter Nazi Germany.
However, the negotiations for a military alliance between the Soviet Union, England, and France were unsuccessful due to disagreements and mistrust among the parties. As a result, in March 1939, Germany annexed Czechoslovakia, which became a catalyst for the signing of the Munich Agreement between England, France, Italy, and Germany, granting Hitler part of Czechoslovakia's territory.
After the Munich Agreement, the Soviet Union began active measures to ensure its security and signed a non-aggression pact with Nazi Germany (the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact).
Yes, in 1939, the Soviet Union proposed to Poland to conclude an agreement on mutual assistance and a military alliance for collective defense against Nazi Germany. According to this proposal, the Soviet Union wanted to station its troops on Polish territory for defense in the event of a German attack on Poland as well as in the event of a German attack on the Soviet Union.
However, the Polish government rejected this proposal and did not agree to the deployment of Soviet troops on its territory. As a result, when Germany invaded Poland on September 1, 1939, the Soviet Union did not enter the war on Poland's side; instead, it signed a non-aggression pact with Germany (the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact), which provided for the division of Poland between the two countries.
you should read history books before watching these documentaries because almost all of them are biased to one side or the other. russian documentaries are biased in favor of russia, and american/european documentaries are biased i favor of usa/europe... it's always been like that, since the cold war. it never really stopped. putin said about this, that usa and europe are rewriting history on their favor. but nobody cared about that and now they're doing the same thing in russia. it's a fucked up planet...
Correct. The Soviets invaded Poland 2 weeks after Germany.
Interestingly, the Soviets invaded Finland, Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, and Moldavia all on their own before Germany invaded France.
Please don't censor these documentaries, it takes away the historical importance of them.
I’m not sure who is responsible for that. It’s weird that we have unlimited violence on TV and we blur historical events.
Молотов почти в ничем не ошибся в докладе начала программы.
Якова пленили.
Планы разгрома Франции осмыслил Манштейн.
И Тимошенко был маршал тогда командовал западным направлением.
Черчилль очень забавно отозвался насчет неосведомленности Гитлера касательно русской зимы.
-13° теплее чем -15°
Тактика Японии былф ждать и смотреть,они ждали взятие Москвы.
Битва за Москву не только симболическая победа.
Япония потерпела поражение в "39-м на Халхин -Голе,а в "45-м в Маньчжурии.
Москва -это твердь от которю разбился в прах миф о непобедимости немецкой армии.
Сталин тоже в битве за Москву направлял действия каждой роты.
I think i am the only one who uses these videos to sleep
Are you Swiss? 🙃
Another mistake: the Germans did not penetrate into the Caucasus until 1942, not 41.
They lacked both the manpower and supply to do that in 1941. They tried anyway in 1942 and brought disaster upon themselves.
Look at us now history always repeats itself 😢
How so ?
@ trump won
@@Ken-ck4zn Kursk is once again a battlefield.
@@jebbroham1776 , yeah, weak US presidents embolden tyrants. Maybe we can turn it around now.
@@jebbroham1776Don't worry about it, Russia will be fine.🇷🇺❤️🇮🇳
I would be curious as to know why the Allies thought Stalin & Co would be defeated even up to 43 . It sounds as if the Germans had done better than reported .
Barbarosa was late due to Mussolini's invasion of Greece, which infuriated Hitler who now had to rescue his ally. And Hitler's patience with Stalin's double-dealing finally ended with the Danube Conference. More importantly, Hitler's biological clock was ticking. He knew he only had so much time of good health to launch his attack against Russia. It was Hitler's fear of failing health that spurred him to open a second front when he did.
This example of a leader making historic decisions of war based almost entirely on his personal health should not be discounted when looking at China's Xi and his ambitions on Taiwan. Xi is 71 years old.
What didn't infuriate Hitler though? 😂 half-kidding but, really... he was kind of an emotional toddler in a full (physically) grown male...
Shortly after his stunning victory at Austerlitz in1805, Napoleon commented that he only had a few good campaigning years left in him. I don't much like comparing the two leaders, but both were acutely aware of the relationship between their physical health and their ability to perform. I don't know if bailing out Mussolini much affected the start of Barbarossa. In USSR the Spring floods were still very much an issue along the intended lines of advance and the Germans knew they had to wait for them to subside, to avoid a quagmire from the outset.
It’s a theory, I guess. But, Hitler was on powerful drugs, so he probably felt omnipotent.
@Bretski126 It's from the biography on Hitler
I have a question. why did they manage to take Smolensk and other Soviet cities, but not Stalingrad?
If I had been a Soviet soldier defending Stalingrad, I believe I would have been certain I'd have been shot by my own side for inefficiency or treason if the Germans had captured the city and I somehow managed to survive the German onslaught.
The Sibirian brothers really turned the table on Germans.
How could Hitler not have learnt from Napoleon's invasion of Russia..
30:16 he almost sounds frustrated
What gets me is Hitler planned on the invasion to be 6 or 7 months but yet wanted to starve Leningrad which would take years
Show old pic's and film clips, then story telling with them ,
0:20 welp, they ran into the soviets....
14:45 the other way of looking at it is that the revolutionary movement had defeated the liberal bourgeois element leadership and had to keep going to protect the revolution and defend the motherland
Good commentary but dreadful situation maps!
Historian Ian Kershaw writes in his definitive two volume Hitler biography (Hubris/Nemesis) that, unlike what this third rate documentary claims, not only Hitler but most of his generals genuinely believed that the Soviet Union could be defeated within a couple of months, and in the worst case before winter. Therefore Barbarossa was not a result of Hitler's miscalculation, it was a result of consensus among Germany's best strategists, who happened to be all wrong.
Who was the better politician Hitler or Stalin?
@@jasongoen6298 I think it's obvious... who ended up successful?
Ask your question to both in June of 1945 and you'll find the answer
Why didn't Britain and France declare war on the Soviet Union when they invaded Poland in September 1939?
Why do you always blurr out images that are part of history? The truth is the truth. If those images are concerning to you then you might as well do documentarys about home cooking or something.
You heard the German historian correct?...when he said German generals knew that even if the Luftwaffe had have won the Battle of Britain then invasion over the Dover Strait and Nazi victory over Britain would still not have been possible...That being the case which it certainly is given that no ariel battle in history has ever precluded victory over an invasion...So just what was the point of the so-called Battle of Britain and cant you see that there's definitely something else going on here?
Burdaki amaç neydi bro açıklarmısın lütfen?
It is a very Westernized point of view of what really happened.
I thought it was very accurate. These historical viewpoints seem very well thought out.
całe niemcy miały taką obsesję, i nie bez powodu. po przgranej wojnie z utratą ziem, po walkach w kraju, po wieściach o krawaym bolszewizmie i jego rewolucyjnym pochodzie, po tym jak stalinisci szykowali wojsko kosztem umierających z głodu.
Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan shared three common characteristics, they were both industrial juggernauts, devoid of the natural resources to sustain it, and went to war with the only two nations that had the natural resources they desperately need, Russia (USSR) and the USA. Germany’s military machine would not have survived without Russian oil, gas, and metals, that is why he invaded.😊
Celo njegovo ratovanje je bilo najobicnije kockanje,sa onim sto je imao je postigao max ciljeve,resursi ekonomski i ljudski su isli debelo na Hitlerovu stetu,rat nikada nije mogao da dobije,jednostavno to brojevi proizvedenih tenkova,aviona govore
Perhaps after centuries we will learn the real truth - if we ever learn it. At this time, we live in the ideological antithesis of what Germany was striving for at that time, so history as it is presented today is not impartial.
the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact of non-aggression in 1939; Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggressuon Pact; Lebensraum; room to live; living space; Hitler's 1812: "I've not been defeated by the Russian generals," Napoleon said. "I've defeated by Gen. Winter" Kaiser Hitler;
Tough to root for one side or the other. They were both bat-sh*t crazy.
Some facts. At 22 june Soviet Army on the border between Russian and Germany was twise much bigger then Hitler Amy, 7-8 time more tanks, 8-10 time more aircrafts, more gans. Dictator Stalin was sure in victory. He planed offensive and was not ready to deffensive! Hitler also was sure in victory and did not want to divide win with Japan. Russian paid close to 30 million killed (USA less than 400 thousends) for winning Germany!!!
However, the last sort of "lebensraum" Hitler needed was that huge frozen wasteland to Germany's east.
Actually, Ukraine is known as “the breadbasket of the world” because it has such great farmland! It’s not a frozen wasteland. 🇺🇦
Jika nazi tak menyerang uni soviet mungkin eropa barat sampai sekarang milik jerman itulah keserakahan hitler
At that time Germany had the strongest army, but no matter how strong Germany was you can’t fight America nd Russia at the same time.
The blurring is really annoying. We are not kids.
If Hitler had not invaded East, at some point, would the Soviets been triggered to invade West.
They were about to invade, literally, a few weeks before Hitler, HAD to.
Stalin planned on invading in 1943. It's pretty common knowledge at this point. He didn't think Hitler would invade until 44 at the earliest.
No
@Yuohani What are you talking about?? It's common knowledge that Stalin planned an invasion for 1943.
@@jeffreyval9665 western propaganda garbage. It is well known Churchill was planning an invasion of Soviet Union right after end of WWII in Europe, that is the truth.
The worst of barbarism on display.
Pure EVIL😔😤
NATO is even bigger evil !
Race is hugely important. It's your species, it's your kind. They are your people.
We are all human beings first before what ethnicity. That's why there are wars. 4:09
It's only important to people with a simplistic mindset.
FACT! Breeding proves this. Nature beats Nurture.
@@Crhstian please stop
@@manilajohn0182 I believe that nearly all countries exhibit patriotism when they are at war. I remember during the Gulf War there were American flags everywhere. I don’t think it is simple minded to support your country in a time of war.
Hubris, ended in complete destruction of Germany
А перевести наРусский язык?
সের খুল গেয়া ☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️
Nuk i përkthejnë dot se nuk ju interesojnë çndodhi më vonë Barbarosës
Hitler = Lucifer? 😢
Why are some pictures blurred? Ridiculous!
Anyone else cringe when he said”Frozen into place”
On this issue of world war 2 I Will trust the Russian sources more
Why is no one conveying that we had their military communication & could control weather since late 1930’s.
Do you truly believe December 5th going -40 degrees was by mere chance?
Okay but look at the general weather in December for the last 100 years of that area + they're still unprepared and don't have a system in place logistically to supply their troops with necessities to continue effectively. Look at the land distance + issues with different train track size + infrastructure issues. Yeah they at some point were like "ok supply by air drops" - and that didn't work out either. Everything was based on hope +force of willpower and essentially delusional clinging to denial from there forward... 😂
Hitler did it to himself and didn't really want to listen to much of what he didn't want to hear. Worked out great 😊
I don’t know who was more stupid. Hitler or Stalin.
Micromanaging kills.
Berperang melawan kezaliman dan pelaku-pelaku pembuat kebohongan, munafik dan pelaku-pelaku pemecah belah hubungan baik cinta satu rumah keluarga kandung (Ayah kandung, Ibu kandung, Anak kandung) dan maling harta benda hak milik yang sebenarnya contoh harta benda hak milik kedua orang tua kandung saya.
Suatu negara jika dikuasai pelaku-pelaku penyalahgunaan kekuasaan (dengan harta bendanya) jadinya seperti Indonesia semenjak krisis moneter 1998 Indonesia berada di bawah setara dengan negara-negara tetangga, nilai tukar (mata uang) 1 Dollar setara 15000 Rupiah lebih, dan harga-harga dalam negeri Indonesia semakin mahal.
I heard that Hitler was moved to Argentina after ww2 and was living there, is that true??
нет гитлер застрелился как испуганный сукин сын😂😂😂
@@pratikpagar4718 Hell no, but people love a fantastic story...
USSR with the help of the good old US OF A.
А каква е манията на Путин?
Моля,разкажете повече¿
Според скромното ми мнение,той е опасен за Русия.
Според водещи психиатри.
Човека се е объркал,какво толкова.
Случвало се е и предѝ.
It stuns me when after becoming master of the ehole of Europe Napoleon eent in to Russia snd was destroyed that Germany and today NATO think they can just march in to Russia and survive. All the russians have to do is keep the enemy out of the toens and cities until winter and watch them freeze. Minus ,40 to 60 degrees isn't a temperature thst most counties are accustomed to.
@@SantiagoVeraLoor NATO isn't marching into Russia and doesn't want to. Russia also isn't keen to march into NATO territory, either. This isn't in dispute or misunderstood by those in power. It's the border regions that are scrutinized.
You should watch Mark Solonin.He has more intresting content about this war.
Nazi Germany was a war machine...until they met the God of War machines - The Soviet Union...
❤❤
Czy ten film jest tłumaczony przez AI?? Niektóre zdania brzmią absurdalnie, ilość lektorów też zastanawia...
Was there only one Winter?
@@felipe-vibor 🤣 lol what
@mariehelena2364 their claim is Germans were defeated by harsh winter
After Napoleon and Hitler's failure to defeat Russia, here comes Joe BIden - The conqueror of Russia!
He can't even conquer a speach.
Pocas veces he visto un documental con las enormes incoherencias de los comentaristas (NO analistas) que aquí intervienen. Tal vez como documento de propaganda anglosajona permita explicar los absurdos razonamientos de los comentaristas. Pésimo documento
اپ ا جاؤ نا یار
Беспардонная лож про Советский Союз и особенно про Сталина ! Мерзавец солженицын , для запада по сей день всезнающий..
так Курляндскую губерния куда входили в последствии Литва, Эстония и Латвия царь Петр первый в 1712 году купил у скандинавов за полторы тонны серебра. так что они по праву принадлежат России. В архивах хранятся документы этой купли-продажи .
А где по твоей версии была великое княжество Литовское?Скандинавия владела финами,но Литва им никогда не принадлежала и перешла в Российскую империю после третьего раздела Речьпосполиты в 1795 году.
уже давно пора вернуть прибалтику в родную гавань!😃
@@santahy.4922as Lenin said the czarist empire was “a prison house of nations”
Of course Putin hates Lenin, but admires Stalin.
Grate a our day up to now
لا احد. يلوم. هتلر. لغزو. اتحاد. سوفياتي. اراضي. كبيرة. جدا. مع تخلف. صناعي. و. المانيا. قوة. صناعية. جبارة. لكن. الذي. لم يكن في. حسبان. ارادة. اتحاد. سوفياتي لمواصلة. قتال
обидно что когда мой дед пришел к гитлеру на свадьбу с подарками то он почему то застрелился😂😂😂
жаль деда. А подарки вернули?
@@yurshadrin7671 нет местным раздал
😂😂😂😂😂😎👌😎👌😎
❤❤❤❤