2229 Anti Gravity With Magnets?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 21 жов 2024
- Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @thinkingandtinkering
Don't forget to check out my companion channels TnT Omnibus here / @tntomnibus and TnT Talk Time found here / @tnttalktime
Credit Links
Technical University of Denmark paper:
journals.aps.o...
I'm just shocked that we didn't get Robert re-creating this in his shop. 2 magnets, a Dremel and some aluminum(aluminium)? I'm sure he's got those laying around.
Th mission of the channel is to get viewers to investigate th simplicity of the idea
yeah Why don't you doit
Haaah! No doubt about it bro!!!
I once thought that compressing magnetic poles would help to create magnetic vehicles. I now know that this is impossible.
Rob has spoiled you. :)
I think it has to be noted that there is a major difference between countering the effect of gravity and actually being "anti-gravity." Helium can counteract the effect of gravity on an object - like a balloon or a blimp. But specifying that something is ant-gravity seems to indicate that it actually cancels gravity itself.
I think, helium counteracts density rather than gravity. I could be wrong.
@@bryanjoachim5655one could argue density is a big part of ant-gravity as well.
@bryanjoachim5655 Density is just how much overall material, including its sub-parts, is present in the space that it occupies. But that is still a good contribution you've made none-the-less because pressure is made from things trying to become more dense by squeezing in... but failing. If singularities were real then everything would just squash into a dot. Thankfully they are not, or the universe that we know would not exist. So, pressure is the result of all things trying to occupy the same spot and because they can't, this creates pressure, which is basically gravity acting against itself by trying to make everything fit into that tiny dot. So if gravity can act against itself in this way (the way of pressure) what is to say that it can't act against itself in other similar ways too. Take the Lagrange points. At these points you are not drawn to either gravitational body. The gravity is in balance (the way of between) and you won't fall any which way. But, what if gravity can also act against itself at the sub-atomic level. Not quite Lagrange like, no. And, what if magnetism is just a manifestation of gravity. The are no perfect magnets out there. A perfect magnet would be super fearsome to experience. We do, of course, have some very strong magnets like those made out of Neodymium. But, how could magnetism be the result of something so weak as gravity? That surely is absurd. Well, just as for the Lagrange points, and now gleaning here a sage correlation of pressure, what if there are ways for gravity to cancel out at the sub-atomic level also so that we only feel a tiny residual amount of the actual gravity that is present. We've seen that gravity can cancel out, pressure shows less dense objects rising against the call of gravity, plus there is no fear of falling at those special Lagrange points in space, and of course there is magnetism touted here. So what if this can also occur inside atoms by their very nature. Atoms are made of light and light moves very fast. But, it doesn't have anywhere to go because it is locked in its atomic prison. And there is a bucket load of light that forms those atoms. Just ask Einstein's famous formula. Is it just standing still? Is it not imparting any effect? Fortunately Einstein gave us "frame dragging" as well otherwise what the hell am I talking about. And, Einstein recognised light as being a gravitational source itself. Does it lose that when it becomes part of the atom? Why would it? Because it disappears? No, I assure you it is still there. So you've got all this light "moving", not orbital like, unless our moon were trying to deal with a tonne of other moons in kind of close proximity. So how is that going to work then? You've got all this light moving at a relative equivalent to their speed if they were unfettered light. And that must be creating a heck of a lot of frame dragging. So what does frame dragging do? It moves things a bit sideways. And what if that is happening inside atoms and at those relativistic speeds most of that sideways is acting against other sideways frame dragging. The Lagrange points have demonstrated, and pressure, that if gravity acts against itself it just "cancels out". Nothing magic about that. So, what if at the atomic level, where things like to stay at their lowest possible energy, and twist and turn to conform with that, what if that that is exactly what we get... a whole lot of nullified gravity. Maybe gravity is not so weak after all. And science admits that magnetism is the alignment of angular momentum, even if it argues about what angular momentum is. So what if magnetism is just "gravitational alignment". But what's the point of alignment if its just going to attract anyway? Well, the magic of 3D gives us clockwise and anticlockwise. No other number of dimensions does that! So here are two automatic opposites generously supplied to us by nature. What shall we do with them? Well, what if an angular momentum is clockwise in one direction (and anticlockwise the opposite) and its near neighbours are also. What if they are facing another object that is also similarly aligned. Well, the magnet is holding together and maybe it will want to grab onto that neighbour as well. What if the other object that is facing our object is pointing at our object with its clockwise face (so that it is oppositely aligned). Well, fight on! Maybe my suggestion is that they will repel each other. The other interesting thing is that if you could focus gravity like this, along a line spreading out through two poles, then it would decrease with distance in the same formulaic way as magnetism. So, we see everything coming together, gravity, pressure, momentum and 3D providing the only real possible spatial opposites, clockwise and anticlockwise. What else do you need? So, maybe just as hydrogen underpins all of our atoms, maybe gravity actually underpins everything (the way of oppositional drag). Maybe gravity, who appears so weak, is actually just showing us the neatest disguise that has ever been perpetrated...
I think you're absolutely right. Canceling gravity is not the same as creating a force against gravity. For antigravity, it is necessary to create an opposing force against gravity. I have been working on this subject for nearly ten years and I have managed to create a small amount of anti-gravity force. My work continues. I think I can make a bigger breakthrough in this regard this year. If there is no momentum, there is no antigravity. Antigravity is possible by creating a special momentum system.
Dear Lord ladies….
There is no such thing as gravity
The earth just sucks
Possibly the most accurate statement I’ve heard for a long time. “We clearly don’t know as much about magnets as we think we do”.
Magnets are somewhat of an obsession for me, can’t stop thinking about them.
@@whatifididthis...1236 magnets , magnets, how do they work ? I love the answers I get ..
@@Jonathan-b2j7s Howard Johnson seems to have been one of the most knowledgeable people on magnetism, I studied Howard’s work in great detail to design my magnetic propulsion system. The other person worth understanding was Ed Leedskalnin.
@@Jonathan-b2j7s Sorry if this appears twice but I already sent this message only to find it disappeared.
Howard Johnson and Ed Leedskalnin knew more about magnetism than all the combined scientists today.
I studied Howard’s work in great detail to build my magnetic propulsion track, I may never have got there without the knowledge of these great men.
Boyd Bushman worked for Lockheed Martin and conducted an experiment where he took two objects of identical size, mass, and aerodynamic surface, and dropped them from a height. One was inert, the other had two powerful magnets oriented with identical poles pushing against one another. The claim is that, when both were released simultaneously, the object with the magnets in it fell at a rate significantly slower than the inert object, in spite of both objects having identical mass, size, and aerodynamic qualities. This proves that two magnets having opposition to each other "becomes lighter" according to gravity. This should not happen if gravity is a constant. Very interesting Rob and thanks for sharing!
I'm guessing that eddy currents are adding resistance against the Earth's magnetic field slowing it down. Like when you drop a magnet through a copper pipe.
Interesting, I vaguely remember learning about something like this. You've reminded me, thanks!
@@themeek351This is highly likely. Many scientists like Tesla have believed that the "universe is electric", in a basic sense energy is all around us. Of course many critics and disingenuous individuals passed this off as "fringe theory". However, due to much realization many people are beginning to come around to this idea again.
I also think that many UFO/UAPs we hear about are using a variation of this same concept. Whoever are piloting these crafts, they realized that this was the truth a long time ago and developed different types of aerospace vehicles long before we made the plane.
This is the exact reason why over unity or things of the matter holds so many peoples attention. Such an incredibly simple realization that completely changes everything. And prior to that everyone would tell you you’re nuts if you believe otherwise. It’s ludicrous
There are a lot of people who will not accept that life can be simpler than we think.
to some of us, its simply "FM".
F...king magic!@@paulwolf8444
Well said!
I think a lot of solutions people have been looking for for decades or centuries even are much easier than we think.
It's of the modern-day paradigm that people are starting to over complicated problems with complex mathematical theorems and other gatekeeping tactics.
Many people before us solved most problems we've learned today with just mere observation, intellect, and intuition. All 3 of which most people are sadly deficient of these days. The scientific fields have been rife with intellectual dishonesty for a long time.
@@14supersonic well said!
this effect is beautiful and it just makes sense. reaching equilibrium through gyroscopic precession. like a yoyo that spins with its axis vertically meanwhile being "stuck" to the thread. beautiful work, professor
I doubt you have the time to read throuth your comments Robert, but I wanted to thank you for what you do. Your legacy here is invaluable and deeply appreciated and, I think, meaningful in a more elevated paradigm than we can get to think with our present state. May God keep blessing you Robert, as you bless us all
I like This one Robert .... since we can admit that we don't know everything about magnetic force .....and .....Electric force is hooked at the hip to it ....we have to say we don't know everything about electricity either .....we better start cracking don't you think ....
I remember my dad telling me about magnetic levitation back from when he worked in a lab in the 70s. It was a bit different I think and he said they sent AC through the metal floor and used a couple of motors and magnets strapped to their boots to float about the lab. He said it was really hard to balance. They put an end to it cause some guy fell onto the electrified floor and got serious burns and now he wears a mask. It's amazing what you can do with magnets.
I'd like to know more about this killing-floor levitation prototype. There's probably a documentary in it.
Health&Safety has put an end to the advancements we got from these brave pioneers!
Great comment ty
The making of a supervillain
Suppose we build a grand steel killing-floor with motors and magnets.This floats to Earths edge of atmosphere.The SCI-Fi movie The Expanse City can be real life.Employ Mr.Robert Murray-Smith and some wacky Scientist to power the nuclear fusion plantsites on earth to have indefinite clean power for 20,000 plus years.❤😂🎉thank-you Robert
AC is not needed if the floor is made of aluminum, or better yet, copper. In any case the floor is bound to get hot due to the eddie currents. Actively cooling the floor can solve that problem but costs even more energy, so it won't be useful to efficiently move heavy objects. Other than using helium or hydrogen for lift, it's hard to beat the efficiency of hard wheels on a hard surface to move heavy loads. All the other methods I'm aware of (vibration, air cushion, electromagnets) require some energy input which is greater than the energy required to overcome the friction of metal wheels.
It will be interesting to observe the effect, as it is placed under a load.
Thanks , you always bring intriguing ideas forward. Good Fortunes, Great Successes 🤝
Absolutely! Exactly what I was thinking
This is my Jam! great video.
I JUST LOVE THIS ROBERT! With this knowlege and the new magnet from MIT! we can have new ways for really cheap infrastructur as long Peace is in the areas you live in you gone freight heavy loads! with four electric drilling machins! We talk about 72 watt to gear tons of kilogram! Now we talk about electrify on real terms! / Mikael
Lovely insight Robert thankyou for the upload!!
ohh, so that’s why flying saucers spin.
Underrated comment.
I'm still waiting for my flying car, damit! Great video thumbs up.
Respect and love for your work and your videos. Thank you. Sincerely from Türkiye.
Omg Robert; DO IT, show us the magic!!! Show us how you would do it in your shop. Love the example that looks like a dremmel tool. We all have those!
I'm going to try this right now.
Thanks for this video! Yes, a spinning magnetic field somehow allows the magnets to do that "hovering"... which is incredibly amazing. One could imagine a train car with "spinning" sections floating on guide rails ... rather than friction on steel.
You bet!
You can also spin an iron disk between two opposing stationary magnets to generate a current in the disk!
Fascinating, there is something new under the sun. This will lead to some interesting experiments and new avenues of exploration.
Very interesting thoughts of spinning magnets versus using magnets in stationary applications.Thank-you for mentioning the 19th Century man and 1707 year invention.Stir your hot tea and enjoy with a minty leaf and square sugar cube.❤😂
I always wondered about magnets shaped for different functions. Like an S shape or a Y maybe an X shape. Magnets designed for different purposes.
Also design an electric motor that uses both sides of a magnet.
Anyone else remember the youtube vid about the Searl effect generator? A flying saucer starts making more sense with this. Granted my memory is a bit fuzzy, but didn't he state that the generator had to be anchored to keep it from rising up into the air? Truth or fiction about the actual generator, I have no idea, but I could see how this discovery would explain how his generator was able to levitate.
Didn't that have spinning magnets?
@davestorm6718 Magnetic rollers spinning around a circle of center magnets I think. To be honest, I don't remember it very well. I don't think it worked as a generator. At least not one that was replicateable.
i know about the searl effect generator mate
I've no doubt about that. it would definitely fall into your wheelhouse of knowledge, lol.@@ThinkingandTinkering
I wish I could like this one a second time. Rewatching because it was so good.
Insightful and thought provoking as usual.
How did anyone miss this so simple trick so far?
Maybe because 200Hz is 12000RPM and Dremel appeared when people stopped experimenting.
yeah, maybe it was just to uncommon to get to those RPMs before at home@@codures
Thank you Robert, great video
I would love to see some more experimentation on your channel with this topic. I find it very intriguing. I would love to see some specific numbers on how much lift can be generated and what happens as they get closer or further away. Such an interesting phenomenon. I am a chemist, math guy by training, but I love magnets ever since I was a little boy.
I did read about some researchers in Sweden long ago getting some kind of antigravity effect by simply spinning magnets ,but not in the flux lashing orientation , but rather the orientation which wouldn't generate a current in a nearby wire..
You also demonstrated the Faraday paradox almos exactly fouryears ago .
What a great discovery. Can't wait to see what else it can do.
I have a friend who is the embodiment of gravity plus. Wears shoes out at an alarming rate and although only tiny, two strong six footers couldn't lift her off the ground. I have pondered this for many years there is so much left to understand. Your video as always is enchanting
Have your friend stand with her palms face up and try to lift, then try palms down and notice the difference.
Wow, never heard of this although I know you are surrounded with a " protecting force" stopping serious harm from accidents.
this is the stupidest thread on this video
Fantastic, literally fantastic. I'd hazard a guess that this could be extrapolated to lift granite blocks weighing between 25 to 80 tonnes!
Very interesting video thank you.
A piece of Pyrolytic Graphite will float/levitate above 4 magnets, or larger magnetic arrays. No spin required
Robert, it seems there may be some parallel with gyroscopic principles . When you mentioned the perpendicular aspect that's what reminded me of the gyroscope and properties observed there and possibly correlating with some of the properties that are happening with the magnets which may give more insight to the mechanics involved
I find it so funny that no one ever thought, in all the history of magnets "im gonna spin that magnet next to another magnet and see what happens" until so recently!
What else have we not figured out yet thats THIS simple?
Is someone gonna invent zero point energy by shaking a lightbulb tomorrow? lol
Funny old world.
Much love
You just did. Shake the light bulb fast enough (in the right direction) and the magnetic field of the earth will induce an AC current in the wires, causing the light bulb to light up. If the air friction doesn't melt the light bulb first that is.
@@VeniceInventors hmm, thatll be some fast shaking lol
Absolute magic.
It's kinda strange that nobody had spun a permanent magnet before.
condolences, good T'er & T'er...best wishes, man
wonder how this would effect a neo with an electromagnet or vise versa... great upload Bob...cheers
Replace the permanent magnets with coils and feed them with AC at different frequencies? An interesting idea.
Gravity is not the issue. Precise Magnetic Control
It's creating a secondary field because just like if you spin something fast enough it "looks like" a solid object. It is only a partial magnetic field until it is spinning fast enough to close the field.
There's still a huge amount to be discovered around gyroscopics too, especially considering when we're 'still' we're actually not. Taken independently these things are complex but combining them brings a whole new level of opportunity. Still can't create my flux diode though 🙁.
the spinning magnet thingy is similar to the "controll-less / vibratory inverted pendulum" - vibrate a pivoting blade and it becomes stable - inverted (or in any position)
Hi, this is fascinating mate, my mind is racing with visions of ways of building things just listing to this! But im just wondering a few things about this if you don't mind me asking you about this? But does the floater part have to move as well, as in its all ways trying to catch up with the rotating part at 200Hz? So would the floater part magnetic field be at “right angles” to or like “45 degrees out of faze” with the rotating part?
And would this work with a set of Bifilar coil's? where both coils would be at 200Hz with one fluctuating from north to south and the second coil is fluctuating in the opposite direction from south to north or would the 2 magnetic fields cancel each other out at any point?
Or could one have 2 electromagnets facing each other literally about an inch apart with the rotating part in the middle of the magnetic field being held at the 200Hz frequency? Like they do with the ultrasonic transducers set up? A fantastic informative video mate luv it! Take care and have a great day!
Spinning the bottom magnet while not spinning the top magnet,
and inverting the setup, is more interesting.
So, the inverted situation, of the ball magnet at the top,
and the horizontal magnet at the bottom, should be tested.
In the inverted setup, the Dremel would spin the vertical ball magnet.
And the horizontal magnet (not spinning) would be suspended, at the bottom.
Robert, please test the inverted setup!
Two things!
1. Never think you know everything about anything!
2. STOP, I don't think that I cam pack anymore information from this channel into me brain!
Naaaaa just a kidding, keep it coming, I'm about to invent something!🎉❤😂
So that's why flying saucers spin!
Magnified microwaves
I’d like to see a no-moving-parts switching magnetic field achieving this same thing. Step two would be to amplify the field to enact against Earths magnetic field.
I think it would have to be extremely strong to do that, but it would not be hard to build a simple test-unit, just a ring of electromagnets pulsed with the right frequency.
@@matslarsson8790 that would be so cool to see!
Recently watched a video by The Action Lab on Faradays Paradox. Any thoughts on how the interactions could be similar, in terms of the counterintuitive effect spin has in both regards.
Not necessarily "against" any laws of physics as there are none that can't be demonstrated otherwise as approximations, rather it expands on what is commonly thought as accepted dogma
I've been studying Hamdi Ucars work for a while now, and I've been looking to improve this concept using a combination of static magnetic fields and dynamic electromagnetic solutions.
I think if an intelligent power delivery system can be made, with relatively low power output thresholds, then you can somewhat directly convert the mechanical process of the rapidly rotating magnet into an EM system.
I've believed for a while now that EM is the way to go because static magnets can not be scaled. However, EM systems are only limited by the overall power that can be provided to it. So, in theory, you can manipulate whatever the size of the object you want to effect on the fly.
Why would any body want to be against gravity? It might be more soothing if one were to get whole heartedly immersed in the subject, and then dolefully swim around.
Best free thinker on here, great
Thank you.
So a circular ring of magnets spinning around a central stationary magnet should produce some interesting effects ? Maybe two or three rings even more so, especially if counter rotation is used ?
Bravo 👏
I’ve been watching the progress of the Electric Universe theorists for some time, and Yes; Indeed! Physics has left a lot of Magnetic and Plasmatic thinking on the cutting room floor… We may not know much, but we’ve ignored far more. 🍻
They don’t describe how the magnets need to be orientated sadly. At least in front of the paywall.
1st picture on the 1st page!
When we consider the drag forces involved it is not difficult to see that the wake Currents from the primary spinning magnet align N/S N/S so the magnetic forces are effectively "locked in place" and therefore maintain equilibrium regardless of the frame of motion or observation.
Those are my thoughts, though I welcome rebuttal and polite discourse of my opinion. Cheers all!
Thank you sir.
Wouldn't the aluminum plate create eddy currents like when you take a magnet and put it in a copper tube because they are both conducted? I love your channel I watch it almost every morning, thank you for all your effort.
so when a car have this the wheels rotate when it moving we can have floating suspension?
To the right, and up
Hey man, ever read wal thornhill hypothesis electrogravitics, youre exactly the mentality to explore its propositions. Thank you
I have been working on this subject for nearly ten years and I have managed to create a small amount of anti-gravity force. My work continues. I think I can make a bigger breakthrough in this regard this year. If there is no momentum, there is no antigravity. Antigravity is possible by creating a special momentum system.
“The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon for proper physics including the CAUSE of gravity, electricity, magnetism, light and well..... everything.
@@davidrandell2224 Thank you for providing this information. I respect your thoughts, but rest assured that I do not need information from anyone, whether it is old or new information. When the time comes, the whole world will learn about antigravity from me. I swear on my honor and dignity on this matter.
I wonder how this might work in micro gravity. I'd imagine it's already been done, but it seems like an interesting next step.
MagnetoStatic is my favorite Marvel character.
Years back I made a levitating 'top' but it only levitated when I first spun it up and then it fell over. I guess I was actually pretty close to discovering this effect, had I further considered it.
Puts in your mind the spinning of planets and creating a magnetic field.
The idea probably aligns more to the viewpoint of the electric universe (Thunderbolts Project).
the beginnings of the tech of flying saucers. magnetic fluid at speed in a torus etc...
I think that's the secret of ufos, probably combined with super conductors to achieve an incredible strong field that can cancel gravity.
Nothing prevents advancement as much as the arrogance of adhering to the tried and true! Think outside of the box and tinker if you want to truly change the world! 😊💛👍
If i was to build a track with a series of rotating magnets in line, with a longer magnet above this line of spinning magnets, could I build a levitating body along a track that would be able to move along it?
Balance?
@@sparkysho-ze7nm yeah, the idea would be that it would automatically balance and stay in line with the row of spinning magnets.
How does the rotating magnet interact with charged gasses and/or plasma? Would it suspend a "bubble" of it from the magnet?
Maybe Robert is being cautious about anti-gravity devices knowing how Eric Laithwaite fared on the subject?
The magnet hover boards are interesting. They require a metal plate to float. I wonder if that could be done using the earths magnetic field? It does make it possible to make an electronic motors that don't use alternating magnet fields.
the spinning was my point with that doddy drive notion. flat panes for lift and angled serrations for spin. and slightly hemisphereical to keep it in place above the stator. and the rotor and stator both have flat panes and serrations. on top of such a rotor disk you have have NSNS magnets on top of an insulating layer to generate AC. I just think that um. it creates a slip stream i guess. it would slip off the other field rather than keep bouncing off, but do both of these actions at the same time. I'm no scientist
Dear Rob I want to make a request that when possible please do a video on bronze and iron scrap flow battery. It will be awesome. Thank you.
Asking for constructive criticism, I don't see any reason not to put a HAWT on top of a VAWT.
hi!
little words on miroslav turbine?
and about the noel felici electrostatic generator?
thanks for your fantastic work! ;-)
Safe to assume this works with man-made magnets? Also.. does the plate position and mass have an impact
a Turkish electronic, just pickin up a dremel, well, what else to say.....
indeed mate
There's a fairly new (well, more like recently declassified) idea that gravity is a illusuary force - in that what Newton was observing with the apple was really a quantum phenomenon - involving radiating photos - pushing on the objecf rather than two masses creating a pulling effect.
Of course, this would entail throwing away much of our understanding - from Newton to Einstein - of what Gravity really is.
In effect though - by making this one simplification and adding an extra FIFTH dimension - we can actually get the theory to work mathematically.
It's then entirely possible then to build an entirely "anti-gravity" craft by simply manipulating the electromagnetic field.
Not suggesting you try that or anything...
😂 Cheers, Robert!
Orientation and direction problems in all feilds of study and disciplines share some common problems on this and other things
How about trying to spin two differently sized opposing magnets in opposite directions at high RPMs? Could the asymmetry of the system possibly generate a vectorization of force somehow?
in physics and in mathematics they are not "laws" they are theory, this is because theories eventually become outdated, found to be inaccurate, found to be void, or remain unchallenged as science moves forward. another reason is many of these so-called "laws" are based upon/adhere to pure theoretical physics theory, so they only really exist within an equation or set of equations until a direct repeatable observation and even then we are often met with paradox after paradox.
We should probably observe how Jehovah does it and watch planets spin and move around a large magnet like the sun and how they move around an axis without wavering too much and dropping out of phase then we'll be onto something, thanks for bringing this to our attention Rob love your work!
Something about this feels like it could have some impact in a big way. Hard to explain though lol
What about polymagnets, have we achieved static levitation with those?
I think you've missed the point of the static laws your referring to. They are for the static state not the dynamic state.
In China MAGLEV is in commercial operation, been on one!
makes me want to experiment with rotating some ferofluid or mercury.
Have you tried this yourself? I went and bought a drimmel just for it not to work. Extremely frustrating. I'm really hoping to see you preform it so that I can figure out what I'm doing wrong. I can't even get it close. It just throws the magnet. Ive been trying for about a year now. I've also tried using different magnets and motors with no success. Please help!!!
@@LexLuther-sf3zm Hi, did you try having the floater magnet start out on a piece of aluminium, this is essential for hysteresis or eddy currents that allow it to work.
Will the rotating magnetic fields induce currents in nearby metal and waste a bunch of energy as eddy current?
Gravity is caused by the background Neutrino Flux
I'm still waiting for the hoverboard :D
Maybe AI will figure out Anti-Gravity and magnets. Or it already has but doesn't want us to float away.
What if per say you have 4 magnets two of which is doing the rotation levitation then you have one side that raises up and that one magnet that's still in magnetic field have the extra object that 2 magnets are doing the levitation will move with the object and the 2 rotating magnets? I want some neomagnets to play with. I think when we get far enough with certain research we can do magnets that pulls or reveals that one magnet that we are trying to move in large range with very intense speed. I really would like to experiment with this and how it react with the other metals. I think the magnet stuff would work better using cooling and heating methods. And also a knock method that will hit a magnet to attract or pull it. I really would like to play with some of the magnets stuff in wyoming newly found.
You cannot suspend gravity, you can only suspend mass in a space affected by the force we call gravity.
magnetism is irrelevant to gravity. As gravity is simply an effect of density falling through time
if you can levitate it, then you should be able to attract it. Future artificial gravity in low-g may be achieved via 'some kind' of magnetism pulling objects to a plate..?
Gyroscopic lift exist it is basically a spinning wheel with four spinning wheels spinning perpendicular to the large wheel each one fourth the mass of the big wheel. The goal is to make a gyroscopic vortex that is counter to the gravity well of the pull of gravity on earth to make gyroscopic antigravity.