Samyang V-AF 100mm T2.3 FE lens review

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 51

  • @vladimirsergeev6459
    @vladimirsergeev6459 11 місяців тому +1

    Hello Christopher! Please tell something about your test equipment. How big is your test chart and how far it from the (usual, say... m-m-m.. 35mm) lens?

  • @mrbaiser4133
    @mrbaiser4133 11 місяців тому +4

    Small telephoto primes that are optimized for still photography would be more important, especially for street photography. 90mm or 100mm f2.8 and 135mm f4... That would be a great addition to Sony's G-series (50mm f2.5 G...), but I'd buy such a lens from Samyang as well

    • @denis5850
      @denis5850 10 місяців тому +2

      Sigma 90 2.8. Is your friend

  • @KarstenMeyer
    @KarstenMeyer 11 місяців тому +2

    So this is the first of Samyang's V-AF series which is not derived from a lens for still ptotography?

  • @SyntheticFuture
    @SyntheticFuture 11 місяців тому +8

    Very impressive little lens. Very sharp, nice bokeh, the distortion is really not that bad I think. Did not notice it in the video footage. Nice and light as well. Might have to keep an eye on the 20mm version. If that has manageable distortion it might have to go on the list 😄

  • @effrafax
    @effrafax 11 місяців тому

    Nice review as always. This lens seems nice for me as I have some vintage 100mm lenses that I like. And this would be a nice lightweight autofocus option.

  • @MrSindriSvan
    @MrSindriSvan 11 місяців тому +9

    I always wonder personally if focus breathing really matters as much as reviewers seem to make out.
    Watching all sort of high end tv and movies I often notice a bit of focus breathing, and for my own work I’d hardly EVER do a full focus rack.
    Even if I did, the consumer would be oblivious to the lens breathing.

    • @kistovisback
      @kistovisback 11 місяців тому +7

      Yeah. There's visible focus breathing in some great movies too. Nobody cares.

    • @fagyal
      @fagyal 11 місяців тому

      As the matter of fact, focus breathing can be an artistic tool as well.

  • @nightdonutstudio
    @nightdonutstudio 6 місяців тому +1

    Consider it is 100mm and about f2.0, and it is same size and similar weight as its 24 35 45 brother is quite impressive.

  • @panmaew
    @panmaew 11 місяців тому +28

    "......... features that are optimized for video work" And then a couple of minutes later, significant focus breathing. Then the outrageous LoCA. Over to the next one, please, Samyang.

    • @MrSindriSvan
      @MrSindriSvan 11 місяців тому +10

      I always wonder personally if focus breathing really matters as much as reviewers seem to make out.
      Watching all sort of high end tv and movies I often notice a bit of focus breathing, and for my own work I’d hardly EVER do a full focus rack.
      Even if I did, the consumer would be oblivious to the lens breathing.

    • @nightdonutstudio
      @nightdonutstudio 11 місяців тому +5

      ​@@MrSindriSvanI do not worry it as well. If I buy a lens for video, the focus breahting is the least aspect I would look into. I think where it can cost visual distraction is the kind of youtuber doing a lot product showcase that constantly bring product in front of camera and out. That situation I believe having a lens with good focus breathing control is prefered.

    • @acouragefann
      @acouragefann 11 місяців тому

      I don't know it I've shot a lot of scenes where I rack all the way to minimum focus distance, or where I overexpose so much to emphasize Loca. It's almost like it's some sort of torture test + cropped (and most likely done at a close distance) to stress the point - or did you constantly notice it in his sample footage or uncropped?

    • @panmaew
      @panmaew 11 місяців тому +1

      @@acouragefann This could be a fine optics in still photography if you know how to manage the background and foreground and the highlights in them to avoid the LoCa. But the main point is please, Samyang, you shouldn't have dressed up this optics and called it a cine lens.

    • @acouragefann
      @acouragefann 11 місяців тому

      @@panmaew ...or if you take the 10 seconds to remove it in post with 3 clicks in any raw converter in the few cases where it is detrimental to the composition

  • @TanmayHSingh-mj1ne
    @TanmayHSingh-mj1ne 11 місяців тому

    Hey Chris, I want to ask that what is a better macro lens to buy in your opinion the LAOWA 90mm F2.8 Macro 2x Lens FF II or the Canon RF 100mm f/2.8 L Macro IS USM Lens?

  • @marvoski547
    @marvoski547 7 місяців тому +1

    When it’s on the camera does it show as F2 or something else?

  • @handzolahbinmuhammadtaufiq7800
    @handzolahbinmuhammadtaufiq7800 11 місяців тому +1

    Awesome Lens:] May you please test the Brightin Star 35mm f0.95? I would reallyy appreciate that:D

  • @checkarpeat
    @checkarpeat 11 місяців тому +1

    Can you make a review of the samyang 24 mm tilt-shift some day ? It’s already around for quite some time but there are no full detailed reviews of it

    • @DavidGBlair
      @DavidGBlair 8 місяців тому +1

      Dustin Abbott has a review. He thinks it is not very good.

  • @smlhtr
    @smlhtr 11 місяців тому +4

    All the lenses you said have terrible chromatic aberrations have never impacted my real life shooting. I feel that you focus too close so of course that’s a problem

    • @blackcatooow
      @blackcatooow 10 місяців тому

      we trust him because he tells us everything good and bad about lenses his opinion you can set aside, you have the tests and analysis which are what people like to have before they invest into a lens, it’s his way of reviews

  • @tomapaunovic
    @tomapaunovic 5 місяців тому

    Is Samyang going to release stills version of this lens? Something like 100mm f2

  • @karlnotyourbusiness4429
    @karlnotyourbusiness4429 11 місяців тому +5

    Love these lenses. Shame it is not t1.9 like the others. Prefer these to the Sony compact lenses as they are so light and the creaminess is gorgeous. Am a big fan. Want to try them out in a studio portrait setting.

    • @KNAPPAID
      @KNAPPAID 11 місяців тому +10

      100mm with t1.9 would be CHONK BIG , t2.3 is actually more like f2 , so its 99% there

  • @mohanplays
    @mohanplays 4 місяці тому

    Why no a- vf 45mm review?

  • @TanmayHSingh-mj1ne
    @TanmayHSingh-mj1ne 11 місяців тому

    I want to request you to make a summary video of the best 14mm lenses you have ever tried.

  • @GregCoonrod
    @GregCoonrod 11 місяців тому

    Some of the wider variants might be interesting for vlogging.

  • @NetvoTV
    @NetvoTV 11 місяців тому

    Do you think Sony will update the 12-24mm F4 very soon be sure it releases same time as the 16-35mm GM 1 and it updated months ago?
    Should I pair it or Loawa 10-18mm F4.5-5.6 with A7RV with 50-400mm F4.5-6.3 as ultrawide lens with crop to use as everyday lens?

    • @NetvoTV
      @NetvoTV 11 місяців тому

      If you recommend me that 12-24mm F4, should I get it now or wait for the update version and get the 50-400 first?

    • @MonicaHolly143
      @MonicaHolly143 11 місяців тому +1

      Its not that popular to get an update it is still very good the one that needs updates are those that are very old lenses not lens released 3 years ago

    • @NetvoTV
      @NetvoTV 11 місяців тому +1

      Hi Monica, but it's 6 years already, it's good but it will be nice if it have filter attachment place in the back of the lens, if it can be even lighter and aperture ring too!

  • @lazerman121
    @lazerman121 11 місяців тому

    Man I am disappointed you did not do an APS-C test on this lens. Some of the recent Samyang AF lenses the last few years were disappointingly soft on APS-C but think one looks like it may of held up to the more demanding sensor. Do you still have an APS-C Sony and I'd so how does this lens perform? Either way great review keep em up :)

    • @christopherfrost
      @christopherfrost  11 місяців тому

      Judging from these tests the lens will be great on APS-C too :-)

  • @bwest6275
    @bwest6275 11 місяців тому

    Honestly surprised Sony has corrections for this lens.

  • @RishiRajKoul
    @RishiRajKoul 11 місяців тому

    Super as usual

  • @santoshmore221
    @santoshmore221 6 місяців тому

    Thanks for honest review

  • @thalashaan
    @thalashaan 11 місяців тому

    What’s the short focus distance ?

  • @xenon2Merchant
    @xenon2Merchant 11 місяців тому

    Could replace my Canon 100 2.0 + metabones combo.

  • @jcblum1507
    @jcblum1507 11 місяців тому

    Awesome

  • @donaldklopper
    @donaldklopper 11 місяців тому +1

    Bla Bla Bla..
    Thanks for posting ;-)
    When doing your video tests on zoom lenses will you please consider including a parfocal check (as you know, for keeping focus at various focal lengths)? Yeah yeah this was a prime I know...
    Looks like Samyang is going to become a major player for us normal people soon... We're starting to see them in South Africa now.

  • @raygamma8739
    @raygamma8739 11 місяців тому

    f2.3 too bad ,f5.6 nice

  • @aliendroneservices6621
    @aliendroneservices6621 11 місяців тому +1

    Every lens needs both a max:
    T-stop rating; and
    F-stop rating.
    *_Not_* one or the other.

  • @amayasnep
    @amayasnep 11 місяців тому

    Idek what to make of this mess of a lens

  • @NetvoTV
    @NetvoTV 11 місяців тому

    You can talk in the typical chill voiceover but yet still have personality jokes, sometime it's hard to tell if you just talk about the content or you are talking a sa person, that blah blah blah is surprised, is like you typed some don't care script for the voiceover robot hahaha

    • @authenticNL2
      @authenticNL2 11 місяців тому

      How do you ask if a lens is a good choice than insult the person at the same time?

    • @NetvoTV
      @NetvoTV 11 місяців тому

      I didn't insult but wowed by his speaking skills, maybe you got my message wrong