Pontiac Engine Break Down 301 to 455

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 вер 2024
  • Facts talk Pontiac Engines 301.303,326,350,400,389,421,455,482

КОМЕНТАРІ • 997

  • @fiream773
    @fiream773 10 років тому +20

    Thank you for posting this. As a lifelong Pontiac person, it amazes me how many people who don't even own a Pontiac want to argue with me over the whole "Big Block" thing. For those utterly preoccupied with size, there's "Large Journal" 421-455 and "Small Journal" 400-down referring to the 3.25" or 3" crankshaft journal size. I've given up trying to convince the Big/Small guys on Pontiac V8's - let 'em flaunt their "knowledge". Apparently, Pontiac made it so simple it's confusing.
    Couple points on the video: 421 was made through '66 and optional in full-size cars (Catalina, Bonneville, Grand Prix). There were Super Duty (VERY rare and expensive) and H.O versions made as well. Also, the 350 H.O. of '68-'69 is probably one of the most underrated Pontiac performance engines ever produced. It used the Ram Air III cam, heads, intake and carb and due to its lower reciprocating weight, was a much freer revving engine than the 400. It's downfall was a lack of promotion and timing - cubes were king when it was introduced. Had it come out around '71, things may have been very different. Another important fact often overlooked by non-Pontiac people - Pontiac V8's are NOT high-revving horsepower engines! They are low revving TORQUE engines. Pontiacs respond much better with relatively conservative cam selection and 3.90 or lower gears. I've gone 13.83 @ 102 mph in a 3,800 pound, 400-powered Trans Am with 3.23 gears.

  • @b3877896
    @b3877896 8 років тому +28

    The correct 455 Pontiac bore and stroke dimensions are 4.151" bore and 4.210" stroke. Great video!

    • @harryking4007
      @harryking4007 2 місяці тому

      Yes thank you that is correct . I was going to ad that fact also.

  • @originalpunkSxE
    @originalpunkSxE 9 років тому +6

    Great info man. I'm a Pontiac guy myself, and I've had a couple of the engines you talked about, including a couple 301s and the lowly 265. It's true they were turds, but most Pontiac parts (including heads) would bolt up. Because of the shortened deck height, however, once new heads were on there was no intake in the world that would fit. If you want to build one, find a 400 from '67 to '73. The later ones went through some lightening and therefore lost a little strength. Great engine though. I have a 400 now and even stock with a 2bbl it still moves

  • @stevenheise9817
    @stevenheise9817 3 роки тому +2

    Thank God!
    I’ve been trying to tell people this about the Pontiac block since I bought my first ‘68 Firebird. It was the 350 4bbl 4spd with the factory 3:90 posi (limited slip) rear. My buddy totaled a ‘70 Bonneville and I got the 455 4 bbl for $100. Along the way I picked up a tri-power setup from a GTO for $75 and guess what ? I bolted all this together, dropped it into the Firebird and it FLEW. Later rebuilt the engine switched the tranny to a turbo 400 and it would run 7 grand on the tach. I only sold it after twisting that 160 mph speedometer straight down.
    Ahh the memories I have of wrenching on that car.
    Thanks again , loved your info

  • @Tomahawk455
    @Tomahawk455 9 років тому +24

    I'm so glad you made this video. There are some ignorant people out there. The only thing i saw wrong with the video is the 455 actually has a 4.21 inch stroke, not a 4 inch stroke. I have a 455 and I love it! Pontiac's are torque monsters.

    • @ramairgto72
      @ramairgto72 9 років тому +2

      As cool as it would be to have a 455, the crank mains are bringing it down. A 400 with the bore and stroke on the small crank is the way to do it.
      Less friction, better oiling.
      Whats the 455 in?

    • @Tomahawk455
      @Tomahawk455 9 років тому +1

      Go to my page and check it out. Its in a 80 Trans Am. I understand the 3" main is a better performer under rpm. But my engine makes plenty of power below 5500. I have no issues. I utilize the long stroke to make gobs of torque.

    • @dutchylt
      @dutchylt 2 роки тому

      Also the 400 was made until 79, not 78.

    • @jimroy969
      @jimroy969 2 роки тому +1

      78 was the last year.
      Around 8000, 1978 400 ci engines were mated to 4 speed standard transmissions and stock piled.
      These were installed in the 1979 Trans am .

    • @hydroy1
      @hydroy1 2 роки тому +1

      @@ramairgto72 YOU understand grasshopper. You can wind up a small journal 400 four bolt main Pontiac ( AKA WW stamped Ram Air 4 ) with a aftermarket forged crank & rods waaaaaaay beyond any 455 with a forged crank & rods and the power is more than enough with a 400 to pull more horse power because the 400 cranks are so heavy that they really turn on AFTER 7,500rpm !. This is why the ultimate Pontiac motor of them ALL if you get rid of the factory cast crank & rods and use a forged crank & rods is the tunnel port Ram Air V 400 even out doing the 455/421 Super Dutys by alot. ( I never thought I would even find anyone but ME that knew this!)

  • @TBullCajunbreadmaker
    @TBullCajunbreadmaker 4 роки тому +3

    I'm 67 years old and I knew about this Pontiac block thing before I ever got out of high school. I have always said that if you want a really dependable, strong, and capable engine that puts out a lot of horsepower without all kinds of mods to it, all you have to do is drop a Pontiac or Oldsmobile 455 engine into whatever you are running. I have always advocated the power of the 455. One of the best engines ever made. When I turned 18 years old I became a professional transfer driver for all of the dealerships in the southern region of the U.S. I drove just about everything you could imagine that ran on tires, sometimes short drives but sometimes many, many hundreds of miles all without stopping for anything except for fuel and pick up food on the go. It was one of the most enjoyable jobs I ever had and I was lucky to get the job. My biggest asset was to never open the trunk and keep my mouth shut if I had to open it and see what was in it. I also was never late and always on time. People would be amazed at what can be put in the trunk of a brand new Oldsmobile Ninety-Eight or Delta 88. The Buicks were about the same room size. Those 1970s model cars would really run through some miles and never strain those big 455s with the big ass quadrajet 4 barrels.

  • @davecalvo6418
    @davecalvo6418 3 роки тому +3

    What a great video, I'm a huge Pontiac guy and I have a 301ci (blown from my TA) and i replaced it with a 1968 400 HO and this engine is ballsy as hell!. Many people refer to the Pontiac engine as an "Intermediate" block. I will say that the RAM AiR IV (if you can find one is a rare engine with many custom parts like the heads which are round port and the forged cranks which are 4 bolt mains along with other upgrades and they went like hell but super rare. I think they only made 580 or so. The 455 cu engines both the HO and later the Super Duty engines had relatively low compression 8.4:1 to meet new emissions laws but made gobs of torque and were some of the best high HP motors Pontiac made in the early 70's
    I'm sorry you had to deal with that knucklehead claiming they made a big block, he is obviously clueless.

  • @tommcqueen2840
    @tommcqueen2840 3 роки тому +2

    I've bled Pontiac Blue for decades. And I've used my share of factory Hi-Po parts. But the aftermarket heads and blocks that are now available from multiple vendors allows for way more power with better reliability.

    • @nemesisxrox6773
      @nemesisxrox6773 3 роки тому

      ... u may b a good source for info - did Pontiac stamp vin's on blocks ?

    • @tommcqueen2840
      @tommcqueen2840 2 роки тому

      @@nemesisxrox6773 Vehicle Identification Number (VIN):
      The block VIN and the vehicle VIN were the same, but by late 1967 the block VIN was revised. It started out with a 2 (for Pontiac), the last digit of the year and a letter for the assembly plant followed by the last 6 digits of the vehicle VIN. It was located on the front of the block, on the passengers side, at the bottom near the timing cover.

  • @warrennelson5133
    @warrennelson5133 8 років тому +3

    Many thanks for doing this video. I'm an engineer and had a 1967 GTO when I was in school from 69 to 72. Unfortunately it overheated and blew up in 1973 and I had to find a replacement 400 for the car. It was difficult at the time because the crank shaft rear bearing for the Munci 4 speed I had was different than the automatic so I learned more than I wanted to know back then putting the engine back together. Today I have a restored Eldorado I take to car shows but can't tell you how many times I've had this discussion regarding the Pontiac block sizes especially with guys that have a 455. Many insist that the 389 that they put in the GTO in 1966 was a smaller block than the 400 for 67. I think in the future I'll take an IPad with me with the link to your video.

  • @letitrest4662
    @letitrest4662 3 роки тому +2

    The only bad thing about the larger displacement Pontiac engines is that they have relatively short connecting rods, for the amount of crank stroke they have. Translated, cylinder wall side loading, and wear, which leads to oil burning after about 60,000 miles. Other than that, they are torque monsters. In fact a Pontiac regular production car had a Road and Track Magazine record for 0-60 mph. It was a 1963(?) full size Pontiac, with the 421 tri-power setup. The Pontiacs and the big Olds engines made lots of torque. Both were prone to burn oil as they built mileage, compared to others.

    • @russbonneau9152
      @russbonneau9152 Рік тому

      that's interesting to know about the sideloading. are the 455's immune from that?

  • @Myvintageiron7512
    @Myvintageiron7512  10 років тому +30

    Yes pontiac made an overhead cam inline 6 way ahead of its time

    • @stevecobratei8538
      @stevecobratei8538 10 років тому +2

      two different versions, the standard OHC 6(2bbl) and the Sprint OHC 6 (4bbl and bigger cam).

    • @Two90west
      @Two90west 9 років тому

      i wanna clean up my engine bay with a little shine, do you have any info on companies with air cleaner and valve cover kits in chrome for a 265 pontiac, or will any one fit from a 350 on up to a 455

    • @Myvintageiron7512
      @Myvintageiron7512  9 років тому

      HMM Id look on ebay

    • @jonmac155
      @jonmac155 7 років тому +3

      "Firebird indeed came with a 250 cubic inch OHC inline six known today as the Pontiac "Cammer." The Cammer was the brainchild of John Z. DeLorean
      when he headed Pontiac's advanced engineering team in the early 1960s.
      DeLorean wanted to build a sports car powered by an advanced inline six, and he tasked engine designer Malcom McKeller with creating the motor." - Road & Track

    • @Myvintageiron7512
      @Myvintageiron7512  7 років тому +5

      That is correct I am planning on building one of them in a video sreies

  • @caspar0777
    @caspar0777 2 роки тому +1

    I'm a Pontiac fan/owner and you learned me a lot. Thanks for the video. Cheers from France

  • @derrickodyes1934
    @derrickodyes1934 8 років тому +6

    good info yes no big and small blocks but we refer to them as big and small journal. Being 3.00" up to 400 and 3.25" for 421 428 and 455. Big journal engines had excessive friction drag so hot ticket is to turn a big journal crank down to 3.00" and fit into a small journal engine essentially stroking it. All rods are the same 326 to 455 but pistons varied

    • @w41duvernay
      @w41duvernay 6 років тому

      You are now better off getting a Butler performance stroker kit for the 400 3" main and stroking it. Pontiac magazine had a bit of a controversy over turning down the crank size of a 455 crank to fit the 3" main size.

  • @danielboone72
    @danielboone72 4 роки тому +1

    You are absolutely correct about the Pontiac blocks. The 421 was produced from 1963-66. (1962 for racing) The 421 was an option to the 389 which was standard on the full size cars.

  • @mercmarc
    @mercmarc 9 років тому +24

    The 428 and 455 blocks had larger crankshaft journals than the smaller cid engines. So I suppose a more accurate description would be small or large journal blocks.

    • @jackmehoff4613
      @jackmehoff4613 7 років тому +4

      Correct. Except you forgot the 421 had the large journal too.

    • @mercmarc
      @mercmarc 7 років тому +2

      I forgot about the 421. I guess because they're not as common.

    • @terrypetty9822
      @terrypetty9822 6 років тому +1

      And short or tall decks.

    • @maxxmasson4263
      @maxxmasson4263 6 років тому +3

      youre right I believe the 421 also had the 3.25 mains and the other blocks had the 3 inch journals

    • @1575murray
      @1575murray 3 роки тому

      @@maxxmasson4263 The 421 and 428 are less common than the 455 because they were only sold in the larger cars since GM had displacement limits on the popular intermediate cars which made up a lot of Pontiac sales in the 1960s. I used to see a lot of Tempest/Le Mans/GTO cars with the 326/389 or inline 6 engines but not nearly as many larger cars back in the day.

  • @krhoft
    @krhoft 9 років тому +1

    I know this is an older broadcast yet the numbers do not lie. This is how the GTO was born and was shuttled through not as a 326 but in reality a 389. Same block, same heads while the only difference was the bore and stroke which were still "Pontiac" design. After all the GTO was a sport trim option when it was first introduced. Of course the dealerships knew what was going on and loved it. There was a reason why the 1964 GTO was only available in a two coupe or two door hard top because the Le Mans convertible could not handle the torque of the 389. Engineering the same block and heads was brilliant!

  • @roddprice9704
    @roddprice9704 5 років тому +3

    Great video. Could ve mentioned 421, 428 and 455 crank journal diameter being 3.25" versus 3" for 400s and smaller as a dimensional change internally but keep up the good work.

  • @LasthourET
    @LasthourET 10 років тому +2

    This is the first step I go to when I want to know something ! Best channel

  • @Formulabruce
    @Formulabruce 7 років тому +3

    Great Vid, and thanks for taking the time to make it! I will add this: Like Chevy, Pontiac made Small and Large journal Engines. People ask me I just say My Engine is a large Journal Pontiac Engine. I think, in an effort to put a Pontiac 455 Above a SBC, the "big Block" montra was expanded upon.. But maybe the Large and Small Journals is just too much for simple minds to grasp?? dunno.. just some thought. Keep up the good work!

  • @kenh9097
    @kenh9097 6 років тому +2

    Great video! Right on the Pontiac engine know how.., the Turbo 4.9 (301) did have a heavy duty crank in it, the standard L-37 four barrel, L-27 two barrel version had the weight reduced small counter weight crank. Weaker lower end.., you needed a manual trans to pull any power out if it. Thanks for the video!

  • @nicholaseliasson2308
    @nicholaseliasson2308 6 років тому +5

    Appreciate such a brief, yet well-detailed video.
    God bless you #MakePontiacGreatAgain 🇺🇸

  • @chrismansker8870
    @chrismansker8870 7 років тому +1

    well you have to admit that the block itself is kind of big lol love my Pontiac. they have one of the longest rods in a production car so rod stroke ration is excellent in bone stock configuration.

  • @19211265
    @19211265 5 років тому +4

    Excellent 👏🏻 well said!!!
    Finally some one who knows what he’s talking about!
    New subscriber👍🏻

  • @edvisme
    @edvisme 6 років тому +1

    Besides the obvious ALL Pontiac V8's of that era are the same casting. Differences of each engine were cubic inch (bore, stroke, deck height.) There are casting differences of the V8 Pontiac. Engine mounting locations on the block, I.E. to remove a 400 Pontiac and stick a 428 back into its place will not just fall into the same foot print. Different engine mounts/fabrication will be required.

  • @bernieladoucur8516
    @bernieladoucur8516 3 роки тому +3

    Thank you for the information on these kinds of engines. I am going to be working on a friends car. He is the same mind set as that viewer that thought of big block. I am not a Pontiac guy or even a Chevy guy but I will help him out. I am a ford guy building a 460 ford right now and I will be sending it out to the machine shop to get all ready. If you have any tips for me on that or maybe things to watch for from the machine shop that would be great. Thank you again for sharing.

  • @tomm9860
    @tomm9860 5 місяців тому +1

    Your 100% tight. I'm 74 years old and a hard Cour PMD man from way back.

  • @MrLostonej
    @MrLostonej 7 років тому +37

    hey how about doing one on Pontiac heads. .the good the bad...thanks.

    • @doomman700
      @doomman700 3 роки тому +1

      Wallace racing has a nice list of them

    • @kukamungaphobia924
      @kukamungaphobia924 2 роки тому

      KRE warp 6 ram air V heads the best of the best.

    • @dutchylt
      @dutchylt 2 роки тому

      @@kukamungaphobia924 what do you base this on?

    • @alanmeyers3957
      @alanmeyers3957 3 місяці тому

      @@kukamungaphobia924smoking crack, everyone knows the big block 455 head is the best.

  • @jamest.5001
    @jamest.5001 7 років тому +1

    we also had a 80 Bonneville with a 301, with worn cam. so I had the idea to swap in a 69 olds 455, but never got done. I was only 15 and working alone. but the way the 455 moved the boat it was in. I bet it would really move the little( compared to the old olds) Bonneville. I wish I had it now. along with my 71 formula 400 firebird. I kick my self every time I think about how I gave it away basically. great video

    • @Myvintageiron7512
      @Myvintageiron7512  7 років тому

      Yea we all have that one car we regret getting rid of I had a 68 dodge coronet I sold for nothing had a floor shiftier and a 440 it's worth a mint now

  • @72troy455
    @72troy455 6 років тому +3

    I remember seeing a RAM AIR 5 303cid in a drag car that made over 650HP. It revved 10,000 RPM. Hell of a engine.

  • @michaelstrafello8025
    @michaelstrafello8025 4 роки тому +3

    I remembered this at my firs job in 75 I worked for a Chevy dealer and I asked a seasoned mechanic that use to work for Pontiac and all he said was they are all the same there is no big block

  • @stevens9762
    @stevens9762 6 років тому +4

    Thank you for this video,I've been saying this for years

  • @richardknottek6618
    @richardknottek6618 4 роки тому

    The 301 had the same deck height as the 265... I blame blame these two junkers for the sbp/bbp confusion. Thank you for clearing this up, for those who just don't know.

  • @Myvintageiron7512
    @Myvintageiron7512  10 років тому +3

    The Pontiac engines are in between the BBC and SBC size wise although the 455 has similar bore/stroke combo the casting number on the block is the best way to ID it

  • @robertt6327
    @robertt6327 6 років тому +1

    Great blog! It's encouraging to see a guy that knows what he is talking about, Thank you.

  • @BADD400
    @BADD400 9 років тому +5

    The 301T block is stronger than the 301 naturally aspirated 301. There are some people in the 11s-12s look at the 301 garage forum. great vid.

  • @derrickodyes1934
    @derrickodyes1934 7 років тому +1

    the weak link on pontiacs was rod hardware failure so upgrade to arp or the like and oil pickups used to fall out into the pan. One reason they made such good power is they reverse cool and coolant flows to heads then block

  • @zanevanderhulst4301
    @zanevanderhulst4301 5 років тому +7

    So my logic says that a 455 will fit into the same trans am as a 301, correct?

    • @sierraridgereaper
      @sierraridgereaper 3 роки тому +1

      Yep..

    • @tomcherry7029
      @tomcherry7029 2 роки тому

      The 301 is a short deck so it the 265, it look like the block that you marked as a 350 have the larger mains which should be the other wat around . The 421,428 and 455 used 3.5 inch mains the rest used 3.0 inch. So there is a short deck , and a larger and small crnak bearring Pontiac.

    • @bryanguthrie-ej1fb
      @bryanguthrie-ej1fb 3 місяці тому

      Yup

  • @PaganWizard
    @PaganWizard 8 місяців тому

    I always love to show this video to people who firmly believe that Pontiac built a production big block engine, and watch as the steam begins to blast out of their ears. A long time ago, I did hear about Pontiac having dyno'ed a true big block that was in excess of 500cid, but when the "powers that be" at GM caught wind of it, they confiscated it, and destroyed it, all because they didn't want any Pontiac anything to outrun the golden child Corvette. I have never been able to find anything to confirm the 500+cid engine rumors, so if it is BS, I promise I won't get all twisted over it. GREAT VIDEO!!!!!!!!!

  • @72troy455
    @72troy455 6 років тому +4

    1973 SD455 engine probably has the most potential out of the Pontiacs. Just needs some compression and a big cam.

    • @broski6627
      @broski6627 5 років тому

      midnitesquirldog1 fr? I would like to hear more bout that

    • @jessiesimpson316
      @jessiesimpson316 5 років тому

      The SD was the best overall design but smog killed it, the 1970 455 HO was the best of all factory 455's because it was the only non smog year 455.

    • @bluesman7475
      @bluesman7475 4 роки тому +1

      The sd 455 was made in 73 and 74. There was no converter until 75. I had a 74 sd455 I bounght new. The cam was the same as a ram air 4... best cam ever in a pontiac motor. The problem was the exhaust system. The muffler was sideways between trunk and back seat. By removing the factory exhaust, adding hooker headers and thrush mufflers .. you gained 100 hp. I changed the gears from 308 to 372, added a b+m converter and shift kit and removed the plate from he hood scoop to make the ram air functional. The car would run 12.20 s all day long.

  • @HomerJ1964
    @HomerJ1964 4 роки тому

    I’m very late to the game here, but I was one of those Pontiac Big Block guys. I just picked up a 74 Grand Am with a 455 and now I know better. Thanks for setting me straight.

  • @nicholaseliasson2308
    @nicholaseliasson2308 5 років тому +4

    Appreciate your well-detailed video. God bless you.

  • @eugenelong1134
    @eugenelong1134 2 роки тому

    You are so right about the Pontiac engines. With that said, Pontiac engines are only ones that i know of that the intake manifolds and heads can be swapped without pulling the distributor every time.

  • @mooch514
    @mooch514 8 років тому +3

    That's when gm and their divisions had their own engines. The good old days.

  • @caseysavidge6585
    @caseysavidge6585 9 років тому +1

    I'm currently building a Pontiac 400 for my Firebird. After it was bored (4.185) I had to stroke it to get the compression up. Bought a forged rotating assembly from Ohio Crank at 4.210 stroke (462CI) and with the 3" main journals. These engines have more than 10" of deck height which lends itself to a great deal of bore/stroke combos. And yes, I just shake my head when someone says they have a big block Pontiac.I have never been disappointed by any of my Pontiac builds.

    • @Myvintageiron7512
      @Myvintageiron7512  9 років тому

      no doubt about they run very strong

    • @jackmehoff4613
      @jackmehoff4613 7 років тому +1

      You don't stroke an engine to get the compression up.

    • @terrypetty9822
      @terrypetty9822 6 років тому

      For all we know he either had dish pistons or large chamber heads. Or maybe he wanted to run high octane or ethanol/methanol fuel. But regardless stroking an engine, all other things being equal, will always increase the CR.

  • @timreichert9982
    @timreichert9982 5 років тому +5

    The stroke on the 455 is 4.21", you said 4.00".

  • @gregfortin9701
    @gregfortin9701 3 роки тому +1

    I have a Hot Rod Engine magazine from the 80s that I learned that from way back then. It did say the crank bores were bigger on some of the big cubic inch engines.

  • @PhilLaird
    @PhilLaird 7 років тому +4

    My 301 in my 81 Trans Am was a poor excuse for an engine. I ended up dropping a 455 in and it was a torque beast. 1981 was the first year they used a computer chip in the Trans Am and it was almost impossible to tune the car.

    • @snowman231968
      @snowman231968 4 роки тому

      In a little lighter car (GP) the 301 wasnt as bad...3200lbs vs the TA 3600lbs

    • @theeoddments960
      @theeoddments960 4 роки тому

      brian r on paper maybe but the 301 is just a poor performer wit weak internals

  • @mitchelmcgarry1718
    @mitchelmcgarry1718 8 років тому

    100 percent right I'm 30 been restoring Pontiacs since I was 17 all motors are the same platform for the most part always loved the brand easy to interchange parts thanks for calling it out

  • @Myvintageiron7512
    @Myvintageiron7512  10 років тому +15

    The 301 Pontiac was a complete terd don't waste your time

    • @pavielleevans2553
      @pavielleevans2553 8 років тому +5

      my 301 runs pretty damn good

    • @pavielleevans2553
      @pavielleevans2553 8 років тому +2

      Lol your opinion but I'm not saying its better I'm just telling my 301 run pretty good that's all

    • @jbncnow
      @jbncnow 8 років тому +1

      +Myvintageiron7512 But the 301 is durable as hell its just not very strong, i had a buddy who had this ole le mans and it had 300,000 miles on it, it was no speed demon but it did last as long as you change the oil regularly.

    • @pavielleevans2553
      @pavielleevans2553 8 років тому +1

      Thank you jay bradley it's done the job so far so I have no complaints

    • @bishai
      @bishai 8 років тому +1

      +Pavielle Evans My dad drove a '77 Buick LeSabre with the 301 Pontiac engine ("Y" code in the VIN) which he then gave to me. It wasn't quick, but it was smooth as butter and very reliable.

  • @libertycosworth8675
    @libertycosworth8675 8 місяців тому

    Good video - just one thing - as others have noted. The 455 stroke is 4.21" not 4.00". The 455 was oversquare - in that it's stroke was longer than the bore. It was the first Pontiac V8 to be built as an oversquare engine. This makes the 455 unique among the Pontiac engines, and also unlike the other similar 3.25" main journal engines, the 421 and 428 which were were both undersquare, with a 4" stroke and 4.094 and 4.121" bores respectively.

  • @richardstrach6104
    @richardstrach6104 6 років тому +4

    Olds and Buick did same gig a different way...no big or small

    • @cdglasser
      @cdglasser 3 роки тому +1

      Wrong. Buick most certainly had a small block (215, 300, 340, 350 cubic inches, 4.24" bore spacing) and a big block (400, 430, 455 cubic inches, 4.75" bore spacing). These block families share almost zero parts in common. The Buick V6 was derived from the Buick small block V8.

  • @SabreMetalPanzer
    @SabreMetalPanzer 8 років тому +2

    I get the whole thing about the "big block" and "small block" thing, and yeah they're pretty much the same sizes, but I wonder if they're considered "big" or "small" in an abstract sense due to the crank journals? A little research gave me some information that the 303/326/350/389/400 engines used a 3" main journal, while the 421/428/455 used a 3.25" crank journal.
    Though it might also be that people generally think that any engine over 400 cubic inches, no matter how it's designed, is a "big block". Even though it's not necessarily true, it's just "big displacement", as evident by the new trend of 400+ci aftermarket small block Chevrolet engines that directly break that conventional rule. I'm a big fan of Pontiac engines and Pontiac in general, and really want to try and build up some sort of big-journal Pontiac into a "sleeper" engine. At least to the guys who have no idea what the heck a Ram Air V top end looks like, especially when the heads, valve covers, and block are painted that blue color. I'm just having a hard time trying to figure out what exactly I want to swing with bottom end-wise. Thinkin' a decent 455 block with a stock bore size (if I can find one) and a smaller 4" stroke crank to make a "poser" .060-over 421-of-sorts (actually about 434ci).

    • @dutchylt
      @dutchylt 2 роки тому

      Nope. Way too much thought, simple answer, block size, nothing internal makes it big or small in titles.

  • @angelasmith8604
    @angelasmith8604 8 років тому +3

    i think your 455 specs are wrong.

  • @satfiredude14
    @satfiredude14 7 років тому +2

    Great info! I always wondered why they looked so similar. Especially sense I've been on the lookout for a 455 to put into my 88 GMC 3500. This info really helped me out on making a decision, thanks!

    • @keithnoneya
      @keithnoneya 6 років тому

      By the way just in case you didn't know the size of the engine is cast into the side of the block under the head where the freeze plugs are. The year of the block is cast next to the distributor hole on the top back of the block. The horse power code is a two letter stamp on the front of the engine next to the timing cover on the passenger side. Just look up Pontiac engine codes or look here: www.wallaceracing.com/engine.htm or here: www.wallaceracing.com/enginesearch4.htm
      Hope you find what you need Shane. Best Wishes n Blessings. Keith Noneya

  • @Kevinegan1
    @Kevinegan1 5 років тому

    I had a Pontiac big block 350 engine that I rebuilt at my high school back in 1979. I know he said that there has never been a big block Pontiac engine but when I removed the slant 6 out of my $150.00 1969 Firebird and then tried cramming in that 350 with headers in its place, I could have sworn that damned Pontiac 350 block doubled in size. The closer I got to the car the bigger that block got. I finally got it in there.
    I bought the 1969 Firebird from an ad in the paper (no internet back then). The man selling it was an airline pilot. It was listed in the paper for $150.00. Turns out that one of the exhaust valves had burned causing the Slant 6 not to run very good. When I went to pick up the car the owner (the pilot) was not there but his daughter and wife were there. I gave them a check for the $150.00, got the title and drove it home. Two weeks later I get a check in the mail from the pilot. In the letter, he apologizes for his wife and daughter, saying that they over-charged me for the car. Along with the letter was a check for $75.00. I was 16 then. When I was 18 wound-up getting rid of the car and regretted for over thirty years. Then I did some looking around and located the man that bought the car from me. He was going to restore it but never did. My 1969 Firebird has been sitting in a field about 100 miles away for the last 30 years. I told the man that I really wanted to restore it. The following week the man delivered my Firebird. He didn't charge me for the car or the haul. I checked archived vehicle registrations and the car is still under my name.

  • @trucking604
    @trucking604 6 років тому +1

    Pontiac blocks are all the same size externally, bore and stroke sizes account for the difference in displacement. Technically they were medium blocks. Same thing goes for Buick and Oldsmobile. Some of the larger displacement Oldsmobile blocks did have a taller deck to accommodate the longer stroke, but still the same engine family as the smaller displacement engines. Ford, Chevy and Chrysler had true small block and big block engine families.

  • @HeadFlowInc
    @HeadFlowInc 10 років тому +2

    Pontiac engine families are "Small Journal" ie 326,350,389, &400 main journal diameter 3.00" and the "Large Journal" 421, 428, 455 main journal diameter 3.25"
    NOTE: The 455 has a 4.21" stroke not the 4.00" in the video.
    I'm not 100% clear on whether the 421 was large or small may need to verify. I omitted the 301 because it was a worthless offering... lol
    Agreed there never was a Big Block or Small Block Pontiac...

  • @danielboone72
    @danielboone72 4 роки тому

    People who argue and criticize about trivial things like this, need to get a life! You are correct about Pontiac motors! And YOU sound like a real expert on these things! I've learned a LOT about motors, and you explain things very well. Thanks! Keep up the good work!

  • @keithnoneya
    @keithnoneya 9 років тому

    Thank you for showing this video, I have the same problem with my Chevy, Ford, Mopar friends. Even my son who has just started to get interested in muscle cars refered to my 400 as a big block. I just laughed at him and said who told you Pontiac made big block and small blocks in 1969? He said he told a friend of his about the GTO 400 and his friend said, "Oh your dad has a big block Pontiac". I told him to tell his friend Pontiac made only one block size/weight but changed the bore and stroke. The is no small or big block Pontiac V8's just Pontiac V8. So after educating him he went and educated his friend. The closest thing to a Pontiac small block is either a six cylinder or a four cylinder that pontiac commissioned some shop in the 80 or 90's to combine into a V8. It had two distributors etc. It was probably the last ditch effort at a new true Pontiac V8 that could use off the shelf parts. I don't remember where I read it, but I think it was in HPP Magazine. By the way they were successful in the build.
    Thanks for the great post and keep em commin. Keith

  • @rickysmalling4507
    @rickysmalling4507 4 роки тому

    Very cool video Sir. I learned in high school auto shop that Pontiac had a one size block and Olds did the same. Now in my 50s I've owned many 389s and later swapped to the 400 and 455s. Looking on the driver side of the block on the 70s casts had the size embossed in plain view. On the early casting meant learning the codes which could be a treasure hunt. I drive a '63 Bonneville with a '71 400 that has a '66 tripower. I went 400 to get away from the early 389 that had the old Jetaway trans. I put a Richmond 5 speed behind the 400 engine and it is a blast to drive. Thank You for the tutorial. Keep the young generation informed.

  • @joshtheking93
    @joshtheking93 9 років тому

    This is an honest post I'm a ford man looking to buy a Pontiac because I always loved them and I knew this info and it's good to see a car guy speak of nothing but honest truth about honestly what he loves keep it up

  • @jamesbeshears2283
    @jamesbeshears2283 4 роки тому

    I am glad you made this video. I am often in conversations with people that swear that they have a big block pontiac, or olds engine. It's like talking to a brick wall getting people to understand there there were no big block bop's. Thanks

  • @bobjensen7136
    @bobjensen7136 5 років тому +1

    You are absolutely right about Pontiac engines how ever when the factory would run out of Pontiac engines they would substitute Chevrolet engines and transmissions. My parents bought a Catalina that had a small block Chevrolet engine. It was a bugger to get parts from our local independent parts store because they would look it up in their books. This might be the reason why people think that there are 2 different blocks. By the way it was a real pig. Very low performance. Another tip off that it was not a true Pontiac engine.

  • @keithamdahl3948
    @keithamdahl3948 Рік тому

    I had a 301... Yes it was a "bad" motor. Got it from a little old lady who just drove it to church, yet spun a lower rod bearing destroying the crank. put a short block in as a fix. 1978 Bonneville. :)

  • @robertovalenzuela832
    @robertovalenzuela832 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks,I used to have a puny 301;but I loved it when I took long road trips,cruised great

  • @butterswishflamingconserva1488
    @butterswishflamingconserva1488 8 років тому

    My family's first car was a 1967 Pontiac Executive Safari Station Wagon with a 389 4 barrel(goat motor). The Poncho served our family very well through the years. My dad LOVED that car.

  • @gmccrarygm
    @gmccrarygm 3 роки тому

    so this is probably the main reason I hear the term "large displacement" being used for Pontiac engines in all types of other videos and media on the subject? makes perfect sense now. Thanks for the info!

  • @josephmonaco4503
    @josephmonaco4503 7 років тому

    Thank you again for showing all of the bore and stroke sizes. That clears up the same arguments that I have been having with Idiots who claim that their 455 was a Big Block. I told them that it was only a matter of Bore and stroke that determined the motor size. I'll personally stick with a BBC motor over any other. You are one of the few people who really know what you are talking about. Thanks Pal...

  • @snakebite071
    @snakebite071 9 років тому

    You are 100% correct, its neither a small block or a big block...just a Pontiac block. Maybe some people compare the Pontiac block to a Chevy or Ford small block and assume the "Big Block" theory for Pontiac. They'll learn sooner or later, Thanks for the videos

  • @archittt1
    @archittt1 4 роки тому

    Exactly. Unlike other manufacturers, Pontiac didn't need to design new blocks to get more power, They got it right the first time right out of the gate.

  • @bradlehman1537
    @bradlehman1537 10 місяців тому

    only ever owned one Pontiac engine that I worked on , it was a 400, and all I did to it was a valve job and install a high volume oil pump. also ported the exhaust side a bit to improve flow. but I had no idea that they used the same block on all their V8's It was in a big boat with just a 2 barrel and it ran quite good. thank you for the info.

  • @MrBulldog1965
    @MrBulldog1965 8 років тому +1

    I love my 1971 GTO! Yes the engines are all the same size. But some people do believe there are Big and Small Block Pontiac Engines. Cool Video thanks.

  • @scottmcgehee2933
    @scottmcgehee2933 4 роки тому +1

    The way you differentiate the smaller cubic inches vs the large is by calling them small journal or big journal. I believe 421 ci on up is called large journal. 400 on down small journal. I'm not sure what journal means though. I have heard of it referenced like that thru the years

  • @bryanguthrie-ej1fb
    @bryanguthrie-ej1fb 3 місяці тому

    The only Pontiac engine I think that should have been added is the 366. Absolutely great video.

  • @chrisleggett685
    @chrisleggett685 2 роки тому

    About 1992 I had a 2 door,69 Chevelle I put a 2bbl 283 in,had a 3 on the tree and 3.08 gears. A fella showed up with a trans am with that turbo 301. All he could say was how fast a turbo made his car.
    So we went to an empty street to race. My 283 ate that 301! We are talking car lengths at the finish line lol

  • @benw7152
    @benw7152 5 років тому +2

    Very informative video I've also had the same arguement of big block Pontiacs. I feel like you maybe created a little confusion when saying same block size. In my mind that goes for the 326 to 455. You can't turn a 301 into a 455 due to thinner castings and 1 inch smaller deck height(which you mentioned). You can't use a 400 intake on a 301. Great video and you can correct me if I'm wrong.

    • @Myvintageiron7512
      @Myvintageiron7512  5 років тому +1

      It's also true for the 350 and some other Pontiac engines they cannot be made into a 455 because of bore and main journal sizes

  • @thomaswilsonsr.9206
    @thomaswilsonsr.9206 4 роки тому

    I rebuilt a 301, 2 barrel. The crankshaft broke. Relying on only two counterweights on the crank, in conjunction with the flex-plate and harmonic dampener on the snout, it was incredibly lacking with structural integrity. You'll also notice many parts of the block lack material, from where they tried to lessen the weight of the overall vehicle. It is possible to port the intake manifolds, and even purchase a better balanced crank, with a stroke increase. The 301 was incredibly weak in power, but it did have relatively good torque ratings. If you ever get the chance to see the crankshaft from a 301, you'll notice what I mean. It was the only one ever produced of its kind. If you have a 301, swap it for a 350. Or a 400.

  • @VirginianSpencer
    @VirginianSpencer 8 років тому +1

    Good video. The 421 was available through 1966, and in '67 it was bored out to become the 428. The 389 and 421 were "sisters" just like the 400 & 428.

    • @jessiesimpson316
      @jessiesimpson316 5 років тому

      Yep! The 350, 389, and 400 all had the same stroke but different bore sizes.

    • @ronroberts110
      @ronroberts110 4 роки тому

      Also noteworthy, the 421 won the NASCAR grand national championship driven by Fireball Roberts in 1962. Initially, Pontiac only reluctantly sold some of the 421's to the public to homologate them for racing.

  • @eugenelong1134
    @eugenelong1134 2 роки тому

    Great video, and you are so right about Pontiac engines. With that said, Pontiac engines are the only ones that I know of where the intake manifolds and heads can be swapped without pulling the distributor.

  • @bluesman7475
    @bluesman7475 3 роки тому

    To make it easy, journal size, bore and stroke make the difference in 95% of all Pontiac engines made. Good informational post. I would love one of the Ram Air V's, never seen one outside of youtube.

  • @shawnclark8796
    @shawnclark8796 2 роки тому

    Man you hit this out of the park. Thanks for the clean clear view of reality. That said I’ve owned both the 350 and the 400 Pontiac engine and there is a difference in performance but not much. But I did prefer the 400. Lol my mom had the 455 in her Grand Prix and it was an absolute torx monster. It was a 1970 all the bells and whistles. I owned the 72 Ventura II came with the 350 and yea I grenaded that one. Found the 400 with Chrome valve covers and rebuilt it. Massive difference. And yes it’s the same size block lol. As a young teenager at the time I called it a big block. Go figure but soon figured it out that all them blocks were in FACT the same size. No replacement for displacement. Shortly became my motto. I sold it like a dumpy when I was 20. Got it when I was 14 😁. Mis it greatly. That was 30+ years ago and not a day go’s by that I don’t think about it. Keep up the good work. I’ll be watching. ✌🏻

  • @nightowlofisraeln.o.i2033
    @nightowlofisraeln.o.i2033 9 років тому

    You're 110% right about Pontiac. There never has been or ever will be a big or small block. Simply put pontiac never classified any of there blocks as such, and now or out of business so its etched in stone now, so to speak. Would like to see what you think about the older cadillac engines 425-500ci motors as performance/torque monsters.

  • @voodoochild661
    @voodoochild661 8 років тому

    love this i was just about to write a comment about how there isn’t any differences for the most part. the only way pontiac could have a big block is if you race NHRA because anything over 400ci is considered a big block. great video!!

  • @darrensmith983
    @darrensmith983 10 років тому +1

    The difference in Pontiac engines is the main journal size. The 400 and most smaller engines had 3.00" mains and the 421 and larger engines had 3.25" mains. All differences in the Pontiac engines was internal differences only.

  • @72troy455
    @72troy455 6 років тому

    I built my first 400 Pontiac engine back in 1984. Hard to beat a well built Pontiac, I've been a fan for a while. I'm slowly restoring a 1963 SD 421 Catalina now. Parts for the vintage hotrod Pontiac's are expensive as hell.

  • @geranwilson8813
    @geranwilson8813 7 місяців тому

    The guy was 98% spot. Nuts on my only issue is when he spoke of the performance level of Pontiac entrance. He never mentioned the 421 super duty to 428 super duty.455 Super duty And most definitely people need to know about pontiac engines They don't make a whole lot of horsepower but they make insane Amount Of torque

  • @ZeeboLaywicker
    @ZeeboLaywicker 9 років тому +1

    great vid, one or two things incorrect..the 455 was a 4.15 bore by a 4.21 stroke. the 421 was avail to racers from 61 to 62, then to the public from 63 to 66. thanks

    • @Myvintageiron7512
      @Myvintageiron7512  9 років тому

      Oh hey thanks I always welcome corrections when I miss it a bit

    • @danielboone72
      @danielboone72 4 роки тому

      Yes, the 421 was optional, versus the 389 which was standard equipment on the full size cars, from ‘63-‘66. The 389 came out in 1959.

  • @ThrottleStopRacing
    @ThrottleStopRacing 7 років тому

    The mains on the 455 are bigger than the rest of the Pontiac blocks. Built my 462 blown engine in the dragster out of a 1970 Ram Air III four bolt main 400 develops 713 HP

  • @jeffgravitt3732
    @jeffgravitt3732 6 років тому

    Nicely done. You are quite right, there are no big or small-block Pontiacs, only various bore and stroke combos. Clearly, the guy who argued with you doesn't know what he was talking about, and I'd have real doubts about his ability to build engines.

  • @griffmillerii1885
    @griffmillerii1885 4 роки тому +1

    Thanks for the video. Great points. I thought the bore on the 400 is 4.120”. Also, the 421 was available until at least ‘65.

  • @loudpipesavelives69
    @loudpipesavelives69 6 років тому +2

    That's awesome to know you can take any Pontiac with a factory V8 and swap in a 455 without changing motor mounts, springs, ect.

    • @Lumpy330
      @Lumpy330 6 років тому +2

      If you were to swap a 1960's Pontiac V8 into a 1970 and up vehicle, you would need motor mount adapters. The 1960's Pontiac V8's had a 2 bolt mount pad on the block. 1970 and up used a 3 bolt pad. I swapped a 1969 428 into a 1979 Firebird which originally had a 301. The adapters are basically spacers that have the extra 3rd bolt hole. but they will raise the engine about 1"- 1.5" higher than stock. I couldn't close my hood completely because it would hit the air cleaner cover. I had to use a reproduction Ram-Air pan which sat just low enough to close the hood.

    • @ericmcginnis2097
      @ericmcginnis2097 6 років тому

      David Poudrier I had the same issue in my 78 T.a. Any time I mention that I had a 455 In my ta people online go balistic. It never came with one. No crap. But yeah the mounts push it upward.

  • @michaelroberts6450
    @michaelroberts6450 5 місяців тому

    Since your talking Pontiacs, the 400 is the one to build with the smaller main bearing sizes over a 455, factor called bearing speed which allows it to handle the higher rpm range better, also Any one who builds one up for big power knows the lifter bores have a very thin wall casting that needs to be reinforced it's the weakest point in their block design. The 421 was made until 1966. Now if you want the bible for building one up correctly Pontiac guys if you have a motortrend+ subscription , go to magazines section and find the Winter 2017 issue of Engine Masters magazine it it's a master guide for a person building a stroked 400 block. Should get some useful information for your own build. Great video, very well done just adding a little more information .

    • @bryanguthrie-ej1fb
      @bryanguthrie-ej1fb 3 місяці тому

      🎉True, cut the 455 mains down to 3.00 and stuff it into the 400 block. Bore.060 and good set of RAlll heads with the RAlV camshaft and have a ball!!

  • @TheMrmmkkpro
    @TheMrmmkkpro 7 років тому

    I just wanted to through in in 1966 they deleted the rear water crossover on the intake , and Pontiac actually developed a 427 hemi with the help of Chrysler engineers , great info , thanks .

  • @firebirdmadness5634
    @firebirdmadness5634 7 років тому

    You are absolutely correct. There is no small block/big block Pontiac engine. I have quite a few Pontiacs from the 60's and 70's. I am going to restore my 1967 Tempest this year that came with the OHC 6. Going to be fun.

    • @Myvintageiron7512
      @Myvintageiron7512  7 років тому +1

      nice I am going to be doing a video build with an OHC Pontiac 6 I was able to acquire one recently/... sweet engine

    • @firebirdmadness5634
      @firebirdmadness5634 7 років тому

      Myvintageiron7512 that will be so great. I look forward to watching your video. My dad worked at PMD from1955-1985 and he taught me a lot growing up and pretty much groomed me into a Pontiac fan😂. Currently, I have a 1967 Firebird, 1967 Tempest, 1976 Firebird Formula 400, 1979 Camaro (I couldn't pass it up for a 1500 running car in Flagstaff, AZ😂), 1980 TA (the limited number Cali car that came with the 305 Chevy), 1994 Firebird Formula,couple late 90's Blazers (97 & 99), & a 2009 Trailblazer. Phewww, mouthful. lol. Anyhow, I am glad I found your channel. I will like and subscribe.

  • @gregoryhagan8443
    @gregoryhagan8443 4 місяці тому

    Wow you cleared everything up in a very short time . Thank you very much .

  • @ronaldroberts7221
    @ronaldroberts7221 3 роки тому

    The piston center-to-center dimension for the chevy 283-400 was 4.40", and they made enough engines that they could "afford" to have two block sizes. The small block could fit into cars as small as the SS Nova. The Chevy 396-454 big block was 4.84", so spread across four cylinders per side, the big block was at least 1.6 inches longer. The Ford "FE" blocks and Pontiacs were 4.6", so they were "mid" blocks. displacement up to 455, with a shorter and lighter block than the Chevy...

  • @chatsworth777
    @chatsworth777 5 років тому

    In 1972, I worked at GMAD Van Nuys. One of the guys there had a Ram Air V in Tempest? body car. I assume that it was a 400. I bought heads and manifolds for a Ram Air V from somebody. They were from Jerry Titus's race car,,, brand new. I never found a cam so, I sold the exhaust manifolds to the guy with the 400 RA V. I eventually got in touch with Tom Nell in Pontiac Michigan. He said, sure,, ship them out. I did. He contacted me back and told me that they were for the short deck 303 and would not work on the 400. I never got any money for them.

  • @enthusiasticpaunch
    @enthusiasticpaunch 2 роки тому

    My Dad had a couple of 64 Tempests, one with a 326. I got this talk when I was young because I remarked unknowingly that it was "probably the same" as a 327 Chevy. Hah. I remember one car had no front end and he got it home at night with a couple flashlights and magnets.

  • @jbsjunk
    @jbsjunk 4 роки тому

    Word on the playground is that the crank journals are bigger on the 455 Pontiac only. You can get aftermarket crank kits that are 455 but have the 400 and lower crank journals. They had the oil pressure higher on the 455.

  • @letitrest4662
    @letitrest4662 3 роки тому +1

    I think people may be getting confused by what engine displacement is. Thinking it's the outside dimensions. In fact piston engine displacement is measured by using this formula; Bore squared x crankshaft stroke x the constant (.7854) x the number of cylinders. People stamp larger displacement engines with the term "big block", because they've been hearing that for years. It comes from Chevrolet. The small block(turbofire or mouse motors), and the big block(turbojet or rat motors), and yes they were two different engine blocks. Even among Ford and Chrysler, small block big block don't apply. Big block small block is a Chevrolet thing. Today....... those two terms, don't even apply to Chevrolets. Among v8(Chevy associated engines) I believe they're all some version of the LS engines.