Facial Recognition Cameras
Вставка
- Опубліковано 24 лис 2022
- buymeacoffee.com/pinaci_news
Facial Recognition Cameras are slowly becoming a part of everyday life within private corporations and businesses because it's easier for them to get away with using them as a condition of entry, but it wont be long before eventually they are being used generally by the state. So if you prefer to remain private when you visit your local shops then create your own privacy by wearing a face covering and don't let any police officers tell you that you have to show your face because you don't.
Useful info for photographers...
BitChute channel here... www.bitchute.com/channel/ADPF...
ACPO Photography Guidance.....
www.mediafire.com/file/097t94q...
NPCC ACPO Photography Guidance response email
www.mediafire.com/file/db0l3vi...
Metropolitan police photography advice...
www.mediafire.com/file/3i7rz3c...
Section 5 public order act 1986...
www.mediafire.com/file/u3l0orj...
Police Code of Practice here... www.mediafire.com/file/2vi02er...
ACPO Guidance on the Use of Handcuffs......
www.mediafire.com/file/trgk0i3...
UK photography law...
www.mediafire.com/folder/097t...
Section 50 police reform act...
www.mediafire.com/folder/e2jl...
Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 section 1...
www.mediafire.com/file/ax0sxh2...
Terrorism act 2006 section 5 and 2000 section 41...
www.mediafire.com/file/sy77sdo...
Section 35 dispersal order...
www.mediafire.com/file/1vng04c...
Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 section 26...
www.mediafire.com/file/hnzcq63...
FREE media card template...
www.mediafire.com/file/p12bvc3...
FREE cartoon ID card templates
www.mediafire.com/file/6d51ri...
.
the lack of respect from councils to the citizens who pay every cost is appalling.
It is disgusting. The slide into a police state continues.
Affirmative.
Orwell 1984 springs to mind
A few years ago they were looking at identification by retinal scanning, having the ability to read through sunglasses or burkas for example, not sure how far the project went, but video analytics is incredible in its capability and scary at the same time.
Pretty sure that was part of the reason they wanted everyone in face masks
@@blaz3ofglory570 Facial recog software CAN be used to identify people wearing facemasks, IF the person has already been tagged in one or more images on sites like facebook, instagram etc.
But mostly ist's peoples mobile phones that 'ping' them on security cameras ;)
@@stellahead The Met currently has a fleet of van-based fake mobile phone masts that can be employed at major protests, demos and major public disturbances. Loaded into Police vans, they can simulate a mobile mast so convincingly that your phone will lock onto it as it is the strongest signal. They are then free to interrogate your phone at will.
South Co-op installed the Facial Recognition Cameras several months ago,
and I believe they are now in a court case because it is against the law.
Hope so, SELLOUTS.
I vaguely remember that the Welsh Government landed in trouble over their attempts at rolling out Facial Recognition a couple of years ago. Also a few years ago, The Met (no surprise there) had a test bed Facial Recognition system loaded in the back of a van which had cameras all over it. They parked up in a London street and photographed and searched for everyone that went past. To cynically obey GDPR and Human Rights etc legislation, they announced that FR was being used by placing posters ahead of and behind the van, but anyone that diverted their route to avoid the van or deliberately hid their face was detained by Plod and investigated. I believe there were a few of the usual arrest/de-arrests while these scum trialed a private company's attempts at totally shagging everyone's Human Rights. Given the choice, Plod will treat us all as cattle to be used and disposed of as required.
Now I see why most UK auditors cover up!!
Let me get this right if you were getting searched under section 43 like most auditors which under this section you do not have to give your details. they could just snap an image and find out who you were anyway? Can you imagine the abuse.....
That actually depends on if they have EVER given their names and details.
More reason to not say anything that might incriminate oneself.
That's why the auditors cover up,plus I really think that lockdown was put in place even tho it was not needed because they didn't want millions of people roaming around with face coverings
North korea dont seem that bad these days
🤣🤣😂👍so true
To counter the ones in shops go in the shop 10 a day for a WEEK, noting the time, then do 70 FOI requests. If multiple people do this then they will be wasting ££££ on sending people their data.
how did your FOI request turn out ?
You know they can charge for FOIA requests, don't you?
The 'Police State' is alive and well in the Anglophone nations. Thank the '5-Eyes' for this surveillance and against human rights. Indeed, they want to know (Government) where you are at all times!
Of course, this opens the government up to civil suit, and other 'legal' avenues to seek redress of government, but which the 'Cost' is charged to those the government is hoping to identify: The People, and for whatever reason they think will benefit their outright 'Corruption(s)'!
Japan has developed technology that can accurately identify mask wearers so the addition of dark glasses and the forehead covered would be needed too.
I'm wearing my balaclava everywhere from now on
Im wearing a sheet with two eye holes
@@alicetumblescribbleson5961 gen z will be ringing police claiming some 🐂💩👻
change your walking gait too then :). Don't carry anything with a microchip that is linked to you either. Even contactless cards can be read from upto 6' away. (POSSIBLY further!!!)
Definitely don't upload any videos or geotagged photos to any websites.
Enjoy your new world order :)
😆😆😂😂😂👍👍
Have you not got anything better to do?
I think I noticed them at the self service tills in the local co-op, there is a screen above each till showing the recording of your face, if you are also using a store loyalty/points card at the till then it would be easy to link your image with your name and address which they can then sell to the Recognition creators for their database, I did ask a guard about the tills recording peoples face but he said it was only to prevent theft at the self service tills
I've heard about them. From what I understand, they don't record your face to link with your credit card/loyalty card and what you purchase. What the tech can do is identify the approximate age and sex of the person. So it is used to do the equivalent of check 25.
Pay by cash
I made a simple c-shaped cardboard collar that fits over the video camera which tends to be at the top of the screen of the self service till. Job done. Only had one stand up with a member of ASDA staff that tried to say I was interfering with their equipment, but I carried on and was finished before he wound up enough to do anything. Other than that, most shop staff aren't paid enough, so they don't care.
Almost like social media set us up for facial recognition software.
Facial tech is basic. It can work very well in limited circumstances, such as scanning faces of employees at a building. It can work when the sample database is small in number, say the members of some protest group and identify them. But not when they are amongst the public since they will be too many false positives and false negatives. In terms of working with the general public it will always be crap.
Welcome to North Korea UK
If people stopped paying the voluntary council tax the system would collapse tomorrow....and the police would start working for the people again.....
Would be great but unfortunately British are spineless at mass disobedience.
@@pigswillbepigs spineless apathetic cowards...even when given the tools to break the chains of enslavement they would prefer to line up and moan about being slaves..
Voluntary?
@@davidsmith5523 yes David voluntary, this fact can easily be evidenced...find any piece of legislation that states a man or woman is obligated to pay tax...you will not find any ..make a simple request to your local council via email asking for proof of obligation they will not be able to provide any as none exists and if you can find any there is £100,000 on offer to anyone who can...
@@MegaTreeRat So I concede theoretically compelling testimony but practically useless.
So now I know this I will never use a co op shop again.or any other ship that has no respect for my rights even though I'm a law abiding citizen !
DO NOT FOR ONE MOMENT THINK ITS JUST FACE RECOGNITION,GATE RECOGNITION IS ALSO A VERY ACCURATE SYSTEM.THEY CAN TELL FROM YOUR HEIGHT ESTIMATED WEIGHT & THE WAY YOU WALK/CARRY YOURSELF,WITHOUT LOOKING AT YOUR FACE.FROM SHOPING WITH YOUR CREDIT CARD TO CRIMINAL RECORDS CHECK THEY MATCH YOUR PHONE BANK ADDRESS DETAILS WITH ONE PAYMENT.THEN AS THE BANKS DO NOW THEY RECORD YOUR VOICE PATERN VIA PHONE...
It’s beginning guys
Council already installed them in London
Newham council use them.
2nd biggest supermarket in New Zealand just admitted they’ve been using it, and are going to have it in all stores.
doesn't that imply that they legally can !! ?
All the self checkouts have facial recognition if you're paying by card your details are with your image
It's why fB scans and catalogues very picture uploaded to it, even the faces in the background, to build a database, as many other SM platforms do. Met plod are using BMV with facial rec software (although they say it is not enabled, yet)!
If everyone who is photographed this way asked the Co-op via a sar they would soon be snowed under and have to employ more people or stop using these F.R. camera’s
Ccp uk
Ive got a new app also. Its called the leftarm sleeping tablet app. It detects those in fancy dress breaking the law. Its very easy to use. When being approached by those clowns you gently press the adrenaline button and kapow. It makes you deliver a short lived sleeping tablet to help get the situation under control or you have time to escape the would be thugs
terrifying for freedom lovers
If the app goes against article 8 how is it even legal to exist in the first place?
This technology is also in use at the self-service checkouts in Asda, Peterborough. I wondered why my face appearred in the screen before I started scanning my purchases. Now I will avoid all forms of self-service checkouts where possible. If not then I will shop elsewhere.
Use the self service while wearing a snood or face covering and paid cash.
You know what’s going to happen, those shops will not let you in unless you remove your mask.
Straight Outta Compton track 2 ..
So no need for them to get you to voluntarily give details for joinder, thus no joinder of verbal contract to stand under their assumed authority due to violating your rights a private family life. Now is an even better time to state I do not consent
Interesting PINACI. Hope you and yours are well. So, for two and something years governments around the World, were trying to get all the sheeple to cover their boatraces. And now some government implied facial recognition software. One could only hope the next v1rus, is a technology/Y2K type 😂🤣. That, obviously doesn't affect creators, like your good self. Ty 👍
Well I never wore a mask when they were mandated and most sheeple will just allow the government to follow their every instruction, but for facial recognition I would consider wearing a snood when I leave the house to create my own privacy if it come to it.
😆😆😆😆😅😅😅😅😂😂😂😂😂👍👍
Installed at asda corby.
They are in Asda Wigan
1984..
It sounds like the might be a big rush on snoods.
If you go in some Asda stores theres a camera in the foyer and each head has a square around them so Asda have started.
There's no such thing as Facial Recognition Cameras !! - It's Facial Recognition SOFTWARE !!! EVERY camera can be used to attempt to identify someone - it's accuracy level is highly dependent on image quality.
And the software is crap. It can work with small number of people, but not for large numbers. Too many false positives and false negatives to be useful except as an access method at a building where only employees are allowed entry.
This video deals specifically with police use of the app.
Also this video is from a good few years ago. The software now has a much larger pool of images in the databases it searches.(you can thank facebook instagram etc for compiling those databases)
A quick google search of "facial recognition use by police" shows a vast number of recent lengthy trials by police forces up and down the country and how beneficial the app has proven.
This is not a new bit of tech ! Facebook wanted you to tag yourself in pictures it thought you were captured in, whether or not someone else tagged you first a few years back now.
I am sure I have seen that the Tech can distinguish the face even if you wear a mask , hat or hood
Wat a fuckin liberty
I bought some facial recognition blocking glasses from Chicago last year but no idea if they actually work. I don't have phone apps.
the people vote for this, blame yourselves
Voting is only an illusion of choice. Nothing is the fault of Members of the Public, it’s the cartel making the rules doing whatever TF they please 👍🏻
And this is the kinda shit why I bought reflectacles
Tesco London have been doing this for 2yrs. I reported it and no one wants to know.
The glee on their faces while using an insidious piece of tech is abhorrent .
Comrade it's the future
Big Brother is here.
What happened to our right to anonymity? You don't have to give your name unless arrested!
we must remember that acts and statutes are merely commercial "Law" and not law. a constable is an impartial keeper of the peace. if they start taking IDs of people without first having evidence to support suspicion of a crime, then they have acted beyond their lawful remit. a Police Officer is a commercial role and a conflict of interest with the role of constable. they require your consent in order to act as a Police Officer which means they still require your consent to take your ID. what this also means is that your face is of commercial value to a Police Officer. you can charge them whatever you feel is appropriate.
Taking id in America regardless of articulable suspicion of a crime is commonplace.
@@davidsmith5523 only the consent of the individual can make it lawful.
@@evolutionCEO surely they can investigate once the reasonable suspicion threshold has been achieved. The consent for them to do this is given due to their legitimate policing purpose? In fact policing by this notional consent is their remit. Unless I am wrong? It's the source of any and all powers we give them.
@@davidsmith5523 they have to investigate before they accuse. if they don't know weather a crime has been committed of not, then they cannot accuse.
consensus facit legem is the Latim maxim which means consent makes law.
@@evolutionCEO But surely investigative powers do exist, do we want there not to be such powers? Consent is implicit to a degree backed up by the oath that all police swesr. Which is where the trust theoretically comes from. Its a social contract. One that we have seen breached too many times of late. But reasonable suspicion gives them certain powers to further their investigation. Do we deny that?
terrifying
😨😨😨
So they got you to wear a face nappy in the end.
Haha what a twist
We can also install them to friend 😆
Facial recognition doesn't work on me fortunately
huge rights violation
It's not a problem everyone just wear balaclaver I know that's what I will be doing
Big Brother is Watching YOU
Mite stop them from constantly craving id's
NEVER !!!! The production of a valid verifiable I.D to an on the ground (authorised) officer for direct authentication is still gonna be seen as crack to them.
surely they must inform you ! the private companies at least
When you walk into any private business that uses CCTV you will see a sign somewhere stating CCTV in operation. Same applied for facial recognition, all they need to do is put up a sign on the door.
@@PINACI is it not a data protection breach ,
you mean just like the police are instructed to inform members of the public that they are being audio/video recorded at the earliest opportunity. ?
@@PINACI Is there a law/legislation that stipulates that they must disclose they are using their cctv footage in conjunction with facial recognition software ??
I'm eager to learn if they do or not.
Can they take a picture to identify you, even if you have not commented an offence. Isnt it similar to asking for your details, when you have not committed a crime and legally are not required to provide them.
Clip is from channel 5 police propaganda TV where they like to make cop shows where they violate peoples rights to make it look like they are allowed to be doing what they are doing. Anyone can take pictures of you when in public but whether the police are then allowed to use facial recognition apps to identify you is a different matter and something that would need to be challenged in court which is very expensive.
@@PINACI Cheers Pinaci. Yes its a very interesting way of gathering information, i guess they would argue, its public. As for those shows, never in a million years will i watch them
@@villanuk2394 It takes big organisations, privacy groups and civil rights groups to challenge these facial recognition cameras because they have the money and barristers in the know to do it.
How about wearing a mask, dark glasses and a baseball cap.
Try it !! See how many normal people look at you, never mind the police.
Disturbing news, .
When police can't be bothered to do their beat on the street this is the end product for their convenience
ALSO COVER YOUR EARS, PART OF FACIAL RECOGNITION
On free time audits the police used section 3 to remove his face mask
Take mi6 building, probably one most secure buildings in the uk. If you got over the massive, high, security fences, you would be surround by armed police within seconds. Yet, this building is viewable from google earth. How many auditors detained under section 43, your filming the staff entering. Surely they could install covered walkway security tunnels, from the left, and right of the building, to protecting their privacy? Or move the main entrance to the smaller side st entrance? Or move the building to a less busy part of the country, and not the most populated city in the country? The security idiots there just seems to press the lockdown button at a whim.
it will soon be like china
Photography is not a crime, I don't see what's wrong with facial recognition. Same way we can photograph them, they can photograph us.
Would you like the government knowing exactly where you went everyday as well as what time and for how long, and also be able to track your every movement over the past year or so too ?
@@PINACI Nothing we can't already do. I could follow a police officer's car and record him all shift - what jobs he attends, when & where, who he's with, etc. Not something I'd like to myself, no, but as your channel name states - it's not a crime for them to do so.
Hang on, who doesn't know your face? Who's hiding? We are all here chatting shit in the comments
I AM MAXHEADROOM 🆘💥☠️…
Wake up ,,wise up,, cover-up...it's the new thing,, against the tyrants.
Hi. Hope you are well and you and yours, had a gr8 Christmas. Check out Gypsy Auditor's latest video. 'Man gets fined for calling the police'. Surely if they can fine the public, they can start fining all the council/government bodies/companies, who also misuse 999 emergency services. As we have seen many times in auditors videos. All the very best to you and yours for 2023 🙏👍
Thanks. And yes I did leave a comment on his video.
Welcome to China.
oooh dear ..is a PC acting in office as constable by taking picture of person/s elsewhere
section 64A states, person/s can be
(a) with the appropriate consent
UNLESS (1B) is in place :-
(a) arrested by a constable for an offence;
(b) taken into custody by a constable after being arrested for an offence
I presume as it is under PACE it would be abuse of PACE procedure "CODE of Practice (s.66 of PACE)
then they/PC know if they break abuse PACE CODE procedure ,, maintained by HS (s.66)
they know they can get away from that abuse of PACE code of practice as:
s.67 of PACE
(10) a failure on part:-
(a) of a police officer to comply with any provision of . . a code;
shall not of itself render him liable to any criminal or civil proceedings
from the above (10) on YT auditors where person has informed a PC of unlawful search and going to make a complaint
PC quote ""good luck with that " with a 😁
knowing they can abuse the CODE under s.67 of PACE 🤷♂
let us 🙏
thanks for bringing this up Mr PINACI 👌🙏
(no wonder Hunt wants to get rid of art.2 HRA )
Big brother
Just going too far
There is a certain person living in the sewers of Paris who cares not-a-jot about facial recognition cameras.
Roland Rat?
@@gingerjessy Go to the bottom of the class!! I was talking about...Ssssshhhh!! You know who!! The phantom of the opera!
@@kaikito7662 What about The Penguin? Is he down there?
as a law abiding citizen it sounds like a good thing to me
Another cop in the house🤔
@@Hammertime054 no. I just work for local government.
So what f you're law abiding. Shame you don't have the gumption and brains to protect your freedom. What a sap
@@ChrisPrice1977 What government? There is no government, just a cabal of paedophile psychopathic terrorists.
Everyone can bitch and moan as much as they want in the comments, it won't make a crap of difference.
I'm pretty sure everyone who has left a comment will have a mobile phone account, so your in the system. 'They' already have access to your movements and online activities.
As slowly become a police state, watch the frogs in the pot, ignore the rising temperature.....
They tried in Australia at some stores and got Shut down! 👊💥💥💥
But it doesn’t work to good on dark skin and identify the wrong person
probably a good ting as long you not doing anything wrong!
No it's not. Facial recognition is notoriously unreliable.
Think of all the poor citizens throughout history who weren’t doing anything wrong and spent time in prison, innocence won’t always save you.
👢 bootlicker in the house 🏘️.
Another way to violate our rights but clowns you are breaking the law look me up and I have not been lawfully arrested you will end up paying me a very nice retirement fund.
thanks for the information po lice ask me to take my face mask dawn to identify me I wear because of air pollution ill also use in court my trial section 60AA 🇬🇧 I was thinking of botox I was also thinking camera can only get face recognition from your eyes but not true.🇬🇧🙈🙊🖖🏽🦉🥸
Haha Botox will just deform your but the camera will still identify you.
What you doing out at dawn for the police to stop you?
@@king77703 he meant down obviously.