Modern Traditional Architecture
Вставка
- Опубліковано 4 жов 2024
- I own nothing.enjoy.
"All art and design is modern at the time it is made" - Cennino Cennini
" Tradition by definition, is the inherited and complex evolution of things cultural, social, conventional, and institutional. The question regarding it is: which traditions live and change, and which do not."
"Let us use our intelligence, together, to define our use and understanding of the word tradition, and once again, to proceed using it proudly." -Duncan McCallum McRoberts
It would be wise to start using classic styles again, we need to get over our post-WWII fear of classic and ornate things.
"Have you ever looked at a bizarre building design and wondered, "What were the architects thinking?" Have you looked at a supposedly "ecological" industrial-looking building, and questioned how it could be truly ecological? Or have you simply felt frustrated by a building that made you uncomfortable, or felt anger when a beautiful old building was razed and replaced with a contemporary eyesore? You might be forgiven for thinking "these architects must be blind!" New research shows that in a real sense, you might actually be right." - Quinlan Terry
Fabulous!! feel good architecture. Modern architecture depresses and is soulless. Nobody ever wants to photograph modern eyesores.
*I totally disagree*
Learn to Appreciate all architecture for each has its place
@@mansardmanor3869 most people dont agree with you , most people like traditional styles look at any poll or study .architecture should not be experimental because by the time you realise it doesnt work your stuck with it .classical architecture is time tested and beautiful while new architecture is the opposite ugly and unsustainable( thats why modern buildings are replaced after 10 years while old ones stay) . Architectural style is valid but modern architecture has a lack of style , lack of symmetry , patterns or motifs that make a style what it is .Its just cheaper and people don't get a say in what is built . Architecture should reflect the people who live there not one man who decided not to listen to the public and decide what people wanted for them, people know what they want.
@@jonsonronson7270 Nicely said
@@mansardmanor3869 Indeed it has its place, in the tragic. Here in Brazil, the Capital Brasília is an ugliness scandal. A shot in the foot! And it is only 62 years old, compared to the former capital of Brazil, Rio de Janeiro, which preserves, despite the heritage crimes, its historic buildings and important architectural bias.
@@jonsonronson7270 Wow what a mouth full of opinions
I got your reply a yey later
For Public structures
I agree, people should be involved in the Architect style
Traditional Vs Modern
Try to remember Mankind's first dwelling was in a cave then in the sides of Mountain's
It's all a matter of opinions
People are opening their views to the type of private dwelling they want to live in
As you say UGLY
I say it can be altered to a beauty that the owner see's
Old buildings are cultural heritage! People should look at the buildings not their stupid phones!
haha so true, it sickens me to see always people looking at their phones and walking, completely oblivious to their sorroundings, i'm not agaisnt them reading a good book while on the train, but always with their existance on a phone makes me dizzy
I use my phone to look at old buildings . . .
Edward Kayser Sad reality these days.
Nonsense people should be looking at trees not buildings on the internet./s
America does modern classical and traditional architecture so well, in the UK good modern traditional style architecture is a rare thing
in comparison to the united states YES
but in comparison to other western and eastern european countries, except russia and the netherlands, the uk is an el dorado of modern classical architecture
I don’t know, but I wonder if it’s because there are so many classical buildings remaining in England/ rest of UK. That when you recreate them, quite often they end up looking somewhat “fake”. I personally prefer the medieval, and think the 17th, 18th and 19th century “modernisation” of so many said medieval buildings a travesty! Although beautiful, they were essentially destroying important historical buildings. Much like the mid 20th century - except they didn’t rebuilt quite so beautifully!
11 R I am a bit confused, are the netherlands and Russia better or worse than the Uk when it comes to classical architehcture?
@@slc679 I think when it comes to classical architecture, you cannot compare which is better and which is worse. You can look at the traditional architecture of Southeast Asia and understand that traditional architecture is incomparable
Bring back beauty....long live the rebirth of culture.
I'm glad at least the Americans continue building like this on a big scale. Shame on Europe for turning you back on this.
No, not turning our back, but move ahead.
I'm an urban design student and I want to design places built in a more traditional way. Narrow and smaller streets for clarity and social interaction. Unfortunately, today the main goal is money and crappy rules, so the challenge is to find a way to break through that and create beautiful, traditional spaces again with pleasing looking buildings.
This video made my day! If only there could be a new Renaissance in Architecture. How beautiful the world would be.
honestly we should try to distinct ourselves instead of copying what already exists
@@circleinforthecube5170why? I mean what's wrong with classical architecture or any kind of traditional architecture. I'm studying to become an architect.
@@javierpacheco8234 nothings wrong with it, im just tired of some people acting like modern buildings are all ugly and denouncing 70 years of architecture, the sears tower and john hancock center in chicago are beautiful, so is falling water. echo chambers of people shouldn't be hellbent on replacing ALL modern buildings or demolishing all of them, a 70s house really isint that different from a 1800s one. they also denounce modern architecture by comparing cathedrals that took 100 years to build to some strip mall in Arkansas
Die schönste "moderne" Architektur, die ungemein zeitlos ist, findet Ihr in den deutschen Gartenstädten wie :
- Hellerau (Dresden)
- Piesteritz (Wittenberg)
- Kleefeld (Hannover)
- Margarethenhöhe (Essen)
- Marga (Senftenberg)
- Lauta (Senftenberg)
- Märchensiedlung (Leipzig)
- Plau (Brandenburg)
- Staaken (Berlin)
macht Euch auf die Suche, Ihr werdet wundervolle Welten entdecken und Euch anschließend voller Wut fragen:
weshalb verschandeln wir unser Land mit dem häßlichen Siedlungsbrei?
I pondered this for a long time and realized that the whole reason is in the overpopulation of our cities. It is impossible to provide all people with beautiful architecture.
All the buildings are excellent and their architects deserve my applause! Here in Brazil, modernism invaded the minds of architects due to the search for "consulting houses" and not houses where the revivalist architectural style is in vogue. The truth that architecture students don't learn about architectural history in colleges. Sad truth! Here in Brazil we had great names of eclectic and neoclassical architecture, one of them is the late Ramos de Azevedo. Unfortunately, here in Brazil, everyone gives credit to Oscar Niemeyer, in this architectural funeral bet that was Brasília, in the urban sphere, and which does not carry any beauty in its architectural conception.
Harks back alright...
Where did Colonial Architecture originate from 🤔
One could go back to Greece and yet you find earlier style on *Petra* in the Jordan valley. Are there any earlier periods ?
Who can show where this style originated from.
Was it from the Nephyiliums of the Bible 🤪
Before you disagree, do you have proof 😮
Funny!
Only response can be: This was designed and build in heaven!
But came down in a rotten way...