@Fettleibiger dummer Kleinpenis Emskirchner Slavs do not exist in any historical source and were invented by Catherine the Great in the 18th century for geopolitical reasons. If you show me one source that says about the Slavs, I will give you $ 1000. Bulgarians - Thracians wrote Roman historians in Latin and in Greek.
dario First, I assume you mean Turkic. Second there isn’t any proof that we are turkic either, it’s a theory that hast been discarded by historians in the recent years.
Suomi-Finland Memes Traditionally in Muslim countries you add the entire name of your father to your own name. Exemple: Ahmad’s son will be called Ali Ahmad, his son Muhammad Ali Ahmad, his son Ismail Muhammad Ali Ahmad ans so go on for ever until you get these three paragraphs names haha.
This is belong to the Arabic culture and traditions His name is just Ibrahim It's the same as abraham but in Arabic Ibrahim bine Mohammad means that Ibrahim father was named mohammad And Abu ishak Its almost a nickname Means that Ibrahim son named Ishak
Abu Ishak Ibrahim son of Mohammed. It's an Islamic/Turkic thing and still can be seen in Iceland for example where they still don't have last names. Siegthorson means son of Siegthor for example
The very few oversights (from my perspective) is the omission of the Bulgar state in Macedonia, which was founded by Kan Kouber, Kan Asparouh's brother, in the 670's, in the Plain of Pelagonia, as well as the size of the territory of the Bulgar Empire of Kan Koubrat, which bordered both the Black and Caspian Seas. Overall, an EXCELLENT VIDEO!
Who would win? - A Historical great power on 3 seas and a has create world wide writing system called cyrillic - Some bois writing comments that bulgarians are turkic
Hello, great video, but I’d like to point out a mistake: The Volga Bulgarian ruler who adopted islam was Almish, not Kotrag, so the title of khan was used until 922. Edit: I forgot to mention that the capital was moved from Pliska to Preslav in 893, not in 693.
@@papazataklaattiranimam 'bulgar' and 'bulgarian' are artificial terms in english used to differentiate the two different groups, when in reality both are the same group in both Bulgarian and Tatar (and other related turkic languages), so please spare your unjustified pedantry
@@papazataklaattiranimam 'Bolghar' as it is called in English is long extinct, though its, descendant, Chuvash survives. Neither distinguish between 'Bulgar' and 'Bulgarian'
As the number of evidence of linguistic, ethnographic and socio-political nature show that Bulgars belonged to the group of Turkic peoples.[36][24][26][30] The Bulgars (also Bolgars or proto-Bulgarians[40]) were a semi-nomadic people of Turkic descent, originally from Central Asia, who from the 2nd century onwards dwelled in the steppes north of the Caucasus and around the banks of river Volga (then Itil). en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Bulgaria Bulgars (< Turkic bulgha- ‘to mix, stir up, disturb’, i.e. ‘rebels’) A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian-Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiongnu (late 3rd cent. ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-820 Many Slavic tribes lived within the boundaries of the state, together with the proto-Bulgarians, a tribe of Turkic origin that had settled in the Balkan Peninsula at the end of the 7th century. www.britannica.com/biography/Boris-I The Bulgars were a Turkic tribal confederation that gave rise to the Balkan Bulgar and Volga Bulgar states.The ethynonym derives from the Turkish bulgha-,”to stir,mix,disturb,confuse.” books.google.com.tr/books?id=c788wWR_bLwC&pg=PA354&redir_esc=y&hl=tr#v=onepage&q=Bulgars&f=false (Harvard University Press) The Volga Bulgars, a Turkish tribe then living on the east bank of the Volga River, ... the laws of Islam to the Bulgars, who had recently converted to the religion. www.bookrags.com/research/ahmad-ibn-fadlan-ued/#gsc.tab=0
The Turkic languages are clearly interrelated, showing close similarities in phonology, morphology, and syntax. Historically, they split into two types early on, Common Turkic and Bolgar Turkic. The language of the Proto-Bolgars, reportedly similar to the Khazar language, belonged to the latter type. Its only modern representative is Chuvash, which originated in Volga Bolgarian and exhibits archaic features. The Proto-Bulgarians had a somewhat eventful history prior to their arrival on the Balkan Peninsula. The earliest written sources indicate that they inhabited the region to the north of the Caucasus in the 4th century A.D. and had close contact with the Georgians and Armenians. They belonged to the Turkic ethno-linguistic group and their language resembled that of the Huns, Khazars, Avars and other tribes. (How the bulgarian state was founded-Dimiter Angelov) The Oghur, or Onogur or Ogur[3] languages (also known as Bulgar, Pre-Proto-Bulgar,[4]or Lir-Turkic and r-Turkic), are a branch of the Turkic language family. The only extant member of the group is the Chuvash language. The first to branch off from the Turkic family, the Oghur languages show significant divergence from other Turkic languages, which all share a later common ancestor. Languages from this family were spoken in some nomadic tribal confederations, such as those of the Onogurs or Ogurs, Bulgars, and Khazars.[5]Some scholars consider Hunnic a similar language[6] and refer to this extended grouping as Hunno-Proto-Bulgarian.[7] The only surviving language from this linguistic group is believed to be Chuvash.Omeljan Pritsak in his study "The Hunnic Language of the Attila Clan" (1982)[10] concluded that the language of the Bulgars was from the family of the Hunnic languages, as he calls the Oghur languages.[11] According to Antoaneta Granberg : " the data is insufficient to clearly distinguish Huns, Avars and Bulgars one from another" - introduction, the second paragraph Bolgars are still Turk in Volga region.Mahmud al kashgari wrote bulgar language in his diwan lughat al turk before 1000 years. Even ilovelanguages made video about bulgar language(volga bulgar poet from Diwan Lughat al Turk)
Nice video. However I feel obliged to mention some of the misstakes. 1.Great Old Bulgaria bordered the Caspian sea. 2. North eastern Pannonia was fully incorporated into the Bulgarian empire in 827 after the campaigns of Kan Omurtag against the Franks in 828. 3. The proto Bulgarians didn't use the title Khan but Kanasubigi probably comming from the Indo-European *su- andbaga-, i.e. *su-baga (an equivallent of the Greek phrase ὁ ἐκ Θεοῦ ἄρχων, ho ek Theou archon, which is common in Bulgar inscriptions.) We used the title untill 864, then it was replaced by Prince (knyaz) and later Tsar ( emperor) in 913. 4. The first empire probably controlled Transylvania untill the 960s. 5. Wallachia and what would later become the principality of Moldavia were vassals and controlled by the Second Bulgarian empire between 1190 - 1242 and 1280 and 1322. Epirus was also a Bulgarian vassal in the period 1230-1240s 6. You forgot to mention the Despotate of Dobrudza (1356-1395). 7. The last Bulgarian fortress which feel to the Turks was Lovech which fell in 1422. 8. Bulgaria was a tatar vassal in the period 1286-99 I can't say much about Volga Bulgaria as the sources about its borders are really few.
All of these words are not originally turkic but indo-european. There are still speculations about the origin of the tittle as you see it has an indoeuropean equivalent
I'm not sure you watched the video...half of these mistakes you claim aren't even in the video. For example Dobruja, the prince / tsar titles, etc. are shown.
If I am not mistaken, the land was returned by Romania on diplomatic relation base about an year before WW2 started, it is just that it was not taken from Bulgaria due to it switching to the Allies side after it forfeited from the war in an attempt not to get fully screwed the way it happened from WW1 where it only wanted the Macedonian region back due to the majority of people being bulgarians in the region at the time.
@Peter Todorov Nikephoros I stated that Kubrat was lord of the Onogundurs, Theophanes referred to them as Onogundur Bulgars and Constantine VIIremarked that the Bulgars formerly called themselves Onogundurs. Variations of the name include Onoguri, Onoghuri, Onghur, Ongur, Onghuri, Onguri, Onogundur, Unogundur, and Unokundur.
Turkic people -asian looking dudes with their own pagan religion and culture. - Modern Turks a mishmash of assimilated anatolain greeks, armenians and Kurds with arabic religion and culture
Bulgarians are Thracians wrote roman historians. As an introduction, I want to present some ancient sources which speak about Bulgarian people: - Herodotus writes that the Getae are Thracian people. - Strabo writes that the Moesi and the Getae are from the same family and speak the same language. - Cassius Dio writes that the Getae tribe are part of the Scythians. - Procopius writes that the Getae and Sarmatians are from the same origin. - Stephanus of Byzantium claims that the Scythians are Thracian people. V-VI century - Ioannes Malalas: "The so called Achilles went with Atreidai and led his own army of three thousand men, then called Myrmidons and now Bulgarians" - page 97 www.documentacatholicaomnia....raphia_(CSHB_Dindorfii_Recensione),_GR_LT.pdf picture from the text in Greek: facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10150315761464099&set=o.122376701166845&type=1&theater - Michael Attaleiates: History - ''the Moesi ... are certainly Bulgarians who later received their new name ... Bulgarians Myrmidons ..." - John Zonaras: ''Paeonians - Latins or Thracian people of Macedonia. These are so-called Paeonians. Paeonians were Bulgarians. " - Johannes Tzetza: ''Pyros and Akamas (native) of the Thracian Hellespont, Maronietza Evfimos son of Treziius, Pirehmie, who was of the Paeonians they were all from the Bulgarians, from those of the river Axios, also called Vardar'' (see photo with Greek text). XI century - ''Bulgarians who are named Thracians according to the previous (old) monuments'' - „Hinc iter aggressi per fines Vulgariorum, quos vocitant Thracas, ut habent monumenta priorum“ - Fulcher of Chartres, a French priest, (a description of the first crusade in 1096) III-IV century - Mavro Orbin cites evidence of Marcus Aurelius Kasiodor that Bulgarians fought with the Romans about 390 AD. - Cassiodorus writes that the Bulgarians are old Moesian or Illyrian people - Ennodius Ticinensis (473-524, Bishop, court historian of the Gothic King Theodoric) indicate that Bulgarians are old Moesian and Illyrian people. - 4th century map (see photo) by St. Jerome (331-420) - Mesia hec & Vulgaria (Misia here and Bulgaria). It is composed by even older maps - Bishop Eusebius of Caesarea (270 to 33, called the "father of church history." The map is preserved in a copy of the 12th century. letopisec.blog.bg/photos/123281/original/Karta_Ieronim_4_vek22222.jpg I-II century -Flavius Josephus writes ''Dacians called Bulgarians'' In addition: - Ravennatis Anоnymi Cosmographia: „Inter vero Tratiam vel Macedoniam et Mysiam inferiorem modo Bulgari habitant, qui ex super scripta maiore Scythia egressi sunt.” upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5a/Karte_Ravennat.jpg www.venstar.de/extra/App0003a.bmp - Demetrios Chomateno: Brief Life of Clement Ohridski - ''This great Father was a native from the European Moesians, people usually known as Bulgarians. They were displaced in the old days by the military power of Alexander of placement of Brusa, Olympus to the North Atlantic and the Dead Sea, and after a long time with terrible army crossed the Danube and invaded all the neighboring areas: Pannonia and Dalmatia, Thrace and Illyricum, and and much of Macedonia and Thessaly''
Bulgarians are not Turkic, but Bulgar tribe was. Bulgarians got their name from Bulgar tribe. Just like Russians got their name from Germanic Rus' tribe. Therefore modern Bulgarians are not related to Old Great Bulgaria and Volga Bulgaria.
@@tnritogyabgu3475 The Seljuqs perhaps(I don't agree with the notion of anatolian Turks being turkified Greeks btw, just the anatolian greeks got assimilated in the process of islamification). Also the Rus weren't a germanic tribe. Instead the Rus people(many tribes) were Slavic with a lot of mix with Scandinavians(Vikings) @Johnny Sins There is a difference between Turk*IC* and Turk*ISH*. Modern Turks have the adjective Turkish, while people who originated from roughly Central Asia(don't quote me on that) are considered Turkic.
As the number of evidence of linguistic, ethnographic and socio-political nature show that Bulgars belonged to the group of Turkic peoples.[36][24][26][30] The Bulgars (also Bolgars or proto-Bulgarians[40]) were a semi-nomadic people of Turkic descent, originally from Central Asia, who from the 2nd century onwards dwelled in the steppes north of the Caucasus and around the banks of river Volga (then Itil). en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Bulgaria Bulgars (< Turkic bulgha- ‘to mix, stir up, disturb’, i.e. ‘rebels’) A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian-Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiongnu (late 3rd cent. ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-820 Many Slavic tribes lived within the boundaries of the state, together with the proto-Bulgarians, a tribe of Turkic origin that had settled in the Balkan Peninsula at the end of the 7th century. www.britannica.com/biography/Boris-I The Bulgars were a Turkic tribal confederation that gave rise to the Balkan Bulgar and Volga Bulgar states.The ethynonym derives from the Turkish bulgha-,”to stir,mix,disturb,confuse.” books.google.com.tr/books?id=c788wWR_bLwC&pg=PA354&redir_esc=y&hl=tr#v=onepage&q=Bulgars&f=false (Harvard University Press) The Volga Bulgars, a Turkish tribe then living on the east bank of the Volga River, ... the laws of Islam to the Bulgars, who had recently converted to the religion. www.bookrags.com/research/ahmad-ibn-fadlan-ued/#gsc.tab=0
Bulgarians always create Bulgaria as opposite of turkic people :-)) State move but name doesn't change. Danube Bulgaria (Asparukh's Bulgaria), Volga Bulgaria (Kotrag's Bulgaria), Kuber's Bulgaria, Kabardino - Balkaria (Bat Bayan's Bulgaria), Altzec's Bulgaria (Celle di Bulgheria) Bulgarians were formed ethnic group, Turks were not.
@@Bayganu Kubrat (Gk. Kobratos, called Kurt in the Slavo-Turko-Bulgar Imennik or Name-List of Khans, 20, derived from Turkic quvrat ‘to bring together’) Ruler of the *Onoghurs (Ononghundur) *Bulgars (c.605-42/65?). *John of *Nikiu (120, 47) reports that he became a Christian in ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-2674
The endangered Chuvash language is the only living representative of the Bulgar branch, the earliest offshoot of Proto-Turkic (PT), which is in many respects opposed to the Common Turkic (CT) languages. Evidence from Chuvash is of vital importance in reconstructing Proto-Turkic, particularly its phonology. Chuvash represents characteristic features of the Bulgar branch, such as two types of rhotacism (PT *ŕ > CT /z/, Bulg. /r/; PT *δ > Bulg. /r/ with /j/, /d/, /t/ and /z/ in different subgroups of CT), lambdacism (PT *λ > CT /š/, Bulg. /l/), the “Bulgar palatalization” (PT *s- > Bulg. /š-/ and PT *t- > Bulg. /č-/ in certain contexts) etc. (Dybo 2010; Róna-Tas & Berta 2011). These correspondences provide a more complete reconstruction of the Proto-Turkic phonological system.
moeharvard As the number of evidence of linguistic, ethnographic and socio-political nature show that Bulgars belonged to the group of Turkic peoples.[36][24][26][30] The Bulgars (also Bolgars or proto-Bulgarians[40]) were a semi-nomadic people of Turkic descent, originally from Central Asia, who from the 2nd century onwards dwelled in the steppes north of the Caucasus and around the banks of river Volga (then Itil). en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Bulgaria Bulgars (< Turkic bulgha- ‘to mix, stir up, disturb’, i.e. ‘rebels’) A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian-Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiongnu (late 3rd cent. ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-820 Many Slavic tribes lived within the boundaries of the state, together with the proto-Bulgarians, a tribe of Turkic origin that had settled in the Balkan Peninsula at the end of the 7th century. www.britannica.com/biography/Boris-I The Bulgars were a Turkic tribal confederation that gave rise to the Balkan Bulgar and Volga Bulgar states.The ethynonym derives from the Turkish bulgha-,”to stir,mix,disturb,confuse.” books.google.com.tr/books?id=c788wWR_bLwC&pg=PA354&redir_esc=y&hl=tr#v=onepage&q=Bulgars&f=false (Harvard University Press) The Volga Bulgars, a Turkish tribe then living on the east bank of the Volga River, ... the laws of Islam to the Bulgars, who had recently converted to the religion. www.bookrags.com/research/ahmad-ibn-fadlan-ued/#gsc.tab=0
@@olumluhayatbugunvarsinyari1326 Bulgarians were not turkic ! Who are we Bulgarians. Where is our homeland? What are our origins? The answers to these questions are lost in the distant past despite many theories and assumptions about our roots. One thing is certain - our ancestors lived in the lands of ancient Asia. It remains to be seen from what part of Asia exactly they came to Europe. In scientific circles the thesis on the Persian origins is finding more and more followers. These days, a Bulgarian scientific expedition has left for Iran in search of our roots. Scientists are unanimous and believe that the Bulgarians today represent a genetic cocktail of different tribes and peoples who once lived in our territories for a shorter or longer time. The proof - there is no such thing as a definite type of Bulgarian - he could very well be brown or blond, with blue or brown eyes, tall and slender or short and stocky, etc. The Slavs, Thracians and Protobulgarians are obviously those who left the most important traces in the genetic profile of Bulgarians today.The researchers of the great scientific expedition are however convinced that in our veins the Protobulgare blood dominates and that our ancestors did not come from North Siberia as was believed for a long time, but from the territories of Iran and the Pamir massif. . If scientists can find any evidence for this hypothesis, the Bulgarians' version of Slavic identity will be denied. "In the days of socialism we were 'brothers' with the Russians and that is why our Slavic genes had to dominate. But in truth most Bulgarians do not have the characteristic features of Slavs and when they go to Russia they are asked which ex-Soviet republic they come from ”, explains Alexander Iliev, scientist of the expedition and director. scene from the documentary trilogy on the origins of the Bulgarians broadcast by Bulgarian National Television. This researcher believes that there are undeniable facts which prove the hypothesis of our Persian roots. As, for example, the bas-relief of the knight "Rag e modar", discovered in Afghanistan, bas-relief which in fact is at the origin of the bas-relief of the Knight of Madara near the town of Chumene in northern Bulgaria , dating from the 8th century. It is believed that the word "madar" originates from the word "modar" and is related to the worship of the god Mitra, who for his part is of Iranian origin. Monuments similar to the Knight of Madara have been found in Iran. Linguists, for their part, have discovered that in the Farsi language there are some 800 identical words with the Bulgarian language, some of these words having been adopted by the Bulgarian language via Arabic or Turkish. Let's not talk about the similarities in customs, religious beliefs, cultural traditions. And even : “The curious coincidences are mainly in sciences like genetics, for example, explains Alexander Iliev. We managed to develop a non-representative sample of 58 DNA tests at Pamir which proved a great similarity between our peoples. Research on the anthropology of modern Bulgarian on the other hand shows 40% of coincidences with our distant ancestors of the Pamirs and Afghanistan. We are probably, therefore, part of this great Persian civilization! " Members of the expedition will search Iran for almost a month of libraries and archives, have talks with historians and scholars to gather enough evidence for their hypothesis about our Persian origins. In fact, this is not the first such expedition. Alexander Iliev asserts that all the research so far leads to the following conclusion: “Our information, which coincides moreover with that of many historians of this period, indicates that approximately 150 years after Christ begins the great emigration of the populations of the north of Afghanistan and the south of Tajikistan, emigration caused by the invasion of the "white" Huns, as they are called. After bloody battles, the Bulgarians, along with other peoples, left these regions and settled in the Caucasus. From that moment the history of our people is known. The Bulgarians stay in the Caucasus, build their cities there, etc. Historic Greater Bulgaria was formed during the time of Khan Koubrat, while his son, Asparouh, was the one who brought the Bulgarians to the territories it occupies today and it is he who is the founder of the First Bulgarian State . "
@@OrthodoxBulgaria As the number of evidence of linguistic, ethnographic and socio-political nature show that Bulgars belonged to the group of Turkic peoples.[36][24][26][30] The Bulgars (also Bolgars or proto-Bulgarians[40]) were a semi-nomadic people of Turkic descent, originally from Central Asia, who from the 2nd century onwards dwelled in the steppes north of the Caucasus and around the banks of river Volga (then Itil). en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Bulgaria Bulgars (< Turkic bulgha- ‘to mix, stir up, disturb’, i.e. ‘rebels’) A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian-Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiongnu (late 3rd cent. ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-820 Kubrat (Gk. Kobratos, called Kurt in the Slavo-Turko-Bulgar Imennik or Name-List of Khans, 20, derived from Turkic quvrat ‘to bring together’) Ruler of the *Onoghurs (Ononghundur) *Bulgars (c.605-42/65?). *John of *Nikiu (120, 47) reports that he became a Christian in ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-2674 Utrigurs (Utighurs) Oghur-Bulghar Turkic group, located south-east of the Don River, near the Sea of Azov, and traditional enemies of the related ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-4918 Bolgar, Tatarstan/Russia (Bulgar, Bulgar al-Cadid, Kuybyshev) By the 15th century it was known as Bulgar al-Cadid ‘New Bulgar’ after the Turkic-speaking Volga Bulgars. www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780191905636.001.0001/acref-9780191905636-e-8397 Bulgars, Turkic, also Proto-Bulgarians, Pra-Bulgarians, a pastoral people, originally living in Central Asia. Swept westward in the great movement of steppe peoples ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780195046526.001.0001/acref-9780195046526-e-0850 Kuvrat (Κοβρα̑τος, according to Moravcsik, Byzantinoturcica 2:161f), khan of the Onogur Bulgars; died after 642. Patr. Nikephoros I mentions his revolt against the Avars and alliance with Herakleios; Kuvrat was granted ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100045529 Kubrat , of the royal Duloclan, ‘lord of the Ononghundur-Bulgars and Kotrags [Kutrigurs?]’ www.oxfordreference.com/search?q=Dulo+clan&searchBtn=Search&isQuickSearch=true The Volga Tatars live in the central and eastern parts of European Russia and in western Siberia. They are the descendants of the Bulgar and Kipchak Turkic tribes who inhabited the western wing of the Mongol Empire, the area of the middle Volga River. academic.oup.com/mbe/article/27/10/2220/963437 Chuvash is the sole living representative of the Bulgharic branch, one of the two principal branches of the Turkic family. oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/mobile/view/10.1093/oso/9780198804628.001.0001/oso-9780198804628-chapter-28 Many Slavic tribes lived within the boundaries of the state, together with the proto-Bulgarians, a tribe of Turkic origin that had settled in the Balkan Peninsula at the end of the 7th century. www.britannica.com/biography/Boris-I The language of the European Huns is sometimes referred to as a Bulghar Turkic variety in general linguistic literature, but caution is needed in establishing its affiliations. www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/4CBA0E2CB74C8093EC1CA38C95067D55/S2513843X20000183a_hi.pdf/_div_class__title__Early_nomads_of_the_Eastern_Steppe_and_their_tentative_connections_in_the_West__div_.pdf In the Hunno-Bulgarian languages /r/ within a consonantic cluster tends to disappear projects.iq.harvard.edu/files/huri/files/vvi_n4_dec1982.pdf An earlier date for the separation of proto-Turkic, preceding 209 BC would support the identification of Xiongnu language with proto-Bulgharic or one of its subgroups, while a later date of separation would make its association with proto-Turkic more plausible. academic.oup.com/jole/article-pdf/5/1/39/32972809/lzz010.pdf The Bulgars were a Turkic tribal confederation that gave rise to the Balkan Bulgar and Volga Bulgar states.The ethynonym derives from the Turkish bulgha-,”to stir,mix,disturb,confuse.” books.google.com.tr/books?id=c788wWR_bLwC&pg=PA354&redir_esc=y&hl=tr#v=onepage&q=Bulgars&f=false (Harvard University Press) Turkish tribes who founded a kingdom (9th-12th century) in the region between the Volga and the Kama. www.larousse.fr/encyclopedie/divers/Bulgares_de_la_Volga_et_de_la_Kama/110545 The Bulgars,,Turkish people who were formed on the Don. www.universalis.fr/recherche/l/1/napp/23625 Although the Bulgars were originally a Turkic-speaking people from Asia, they merged with the Slavic tribes whom they conquered in the 7th cent. www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/arts/language/linguistics/bulgarian-language The Volga Bulgars, a Turkish tribe then living on the east bank of the Volga River, ... the laws of Islam to the Bulgars, who had recently converted to the religion. www.bookrags.com/research/ahmad-ibn-fadlan-ued/#gsc.tab=0
Eastern Bulgars , Bulgars Ancient Turkic people originating in the region n and e of the Black Sea. www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/balkan-states Volga Bulgaria was a northeastern European Turkic state that formed during the 9th century and continued into the first four decades of the 13th century. www.readcube.com/articles/10.1002/9781118455074.wbeoe009 www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/social-science/cultures/other/bulgars-eastern referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopedia-of-slavic-languages-and-linguistics-online/*-COM_031941 referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopaedia-of-islam-3/bulghars-COM_23726 www.thefreedictionary.com/Proto-Bulgar+languages encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Bulgars www.thefreedictionary.com/Bulgar encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Bolgars encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Bulgars encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Proto-bulgarians xn--80ad7bbk5c.xn--p1ai/en/content/brief-history-suvar-bulgars bulgarizdat.ru/index.php/book1/article1-1 Bulgars, Eastern bŭl´gärz, -gərz [key], Turkic-speaking people, who possessed a powerful state (10th-14th cent.) at the confluence of the Volga and the Kama, E European Russia. www.factmonster.com/encyclopedia/social-science/cultures/other/bulgars-eastern (Cambridge University Press) books.google.com.tr/books?id=Ylz4fe7757cC&pg=PA8&lpg=PA8&dq=proto+bulgars&source=bl&ots=vvGsuu2J3g&sig=ACfU3U2YuPKKdgVQKhoUi2fyDiC99n4N_Q&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiRqIaDlNvmAhWM-yoKHW38DDI4FBDoATAAegQIBRAB#v=onepage&q=proto%20bulgars&f=false Population genetic analysis indicated that Conquerors had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars. www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-53105-5
I want to point out one misconseption, about how Cyrillic was made by greeks. This is false, Cyrill and Methodious were indeed Greek but they made the Glagolitsa alphabet, originally for Bohemia. Cyrillic however was made by their Bulgarian students and was named after Cyrill. Cyrill didnt invent the Cyrillic script.
No, only one of their Bulgarian students actually wrote the script, it was Clement Ohridski. I think the other students transcripted the script. And yes, that means that Cyril And Methodious transcripted it. And yes, Clement Ohridski was born in Bulgaria, so He is a bulgarian.
@@Hristoo but the oldest proofs of cyrilic script are found in Preslav, where is confirmed cyrillic was used by the late ninth century yet, when is also confirmed that in ohrid, and generally the zones where Clement was active, the glagolitic alphabet was used at least until the XI century. And generally is confirmed the fact that the cyrillic was created and developed in the literary school of Preslav, also because knjaz Simeon Veliki made cyrillic official alphabet of Bulgaria in 893 and left it spread in the nation mainly from Preslav and the zones around the capital city. It is believed that Clement is an innovator and creator of a much simple and effective form of glagolitic, but nothing more than that.
Bulgarians are Thracians wrote roman historians. As an introduction, I want to present some ancient sources which speak about Bulgarian people: - Herodotus writes that the Getae are Thracian people. - Strabo writes that the Moesi and the Getae are from the same family and speak the same language. - Cassius Dio writes that the Getae tribe are part of the Scythians. - Procopius writes that the Getae and Sarmatians are from the same origin. - Stephanus of Byzantium claims that the Scythians are Thracian people. V-VI century - Ioannes Malalas: "The so called Achilles went with Atreidai and led his own army of three thousand men, then called Myrmidons and now Bulgarians" - page 97 www.documentacatholicaomnia....raphia_(CSHB_Dindorfii_Recensione),_GR_LT.pdf picture from the text in Greek: facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10150315761464099&set=o.122376701166845&type=1&theater - Michael Attaleiates: History - ''the Moesi ... are certainly Bulgarians who later received their new name ... Bulgarians Myrmidons ..." - John Zonaras: ''Paeonians - Latins or Thracian people of Macedonia. These are so-called Paeonians. Paeonians were Bulgarians. " - Johannes Tzetza: ''Pyros and Akamas (native) of the Thracian Hellespont, Maronietza Evfimos son of Treziius, Pirehmie, who was of the Paeonians they were all from the Bulgarians, from those of the river Axios, also called Vardar'' (see photo with Greek text). XI century - ''Bulgarians who are named Thracians according to the previous (old) monuments'' - „Hinc iter aggressi per fines Vulgariorum, quos vocitant Thracas, ut habent monumenta priorum“ - Fulcher of Chartres, a French priest, (a description of the first crusade in 1096) III-IV century - Mavro Orbin cites evidence of Marcus Aurelius Kasiodor that Bulgarians fought with the Romans about 390 AD. - Cassiodorus writes that the Bulgarians are old Moesian or Illyrian people - Ennodius Ticinensis (473-524, Bishop, court historian of the Gothic King Theodoric) indicate that Bulgarians are old Moesian and Illyrian people. - 4th century map (see photo) by St. Jerome (331-420) - Mesia hec & Vulgaria (Misia here and Bulgaria). It is composed by even older maps - Bishop Eusebius of Caesarea (270 to 33, called the "father of church history." The map is preserved in a copy of the 12th century. letopisec.blog.bg/photos/123281/original/Karta_Ieronim_4_vek22222.jpg I-II century -Flavius Josephus writes ''Dacians called Bulgarians'' In addition: - Ravennatis Anоnymi Cosmographia: „Inter vero Tratiam vel Macedoniam et Mysiam inferiorem modo Bulgari habitant, qui ex super scripta maiore Scythia egressi sunt.” upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5a/Karte_Ravennat.jpg www.venstar.de/extra/App0003a.bmp - Demetrios Chomateno: Brief Life of Clement Ohridski - ''This great Father was a native from the European Moesians, people usually known as Bulgarians. They were displaced in the old days by the military power of Alexander of placement of Brusa, Olympus to the North Atlantic and the Dead Sea, and after a long time with terrible army crossed the Danube and invaded all the neighboring areas: Pannonia and Dalmatia, Thrace and Illyricum, and and much of Macedonia and Thessaly''
Slavs do not exist in any historical source and were invented by Catherine the Great in the 18th century for geopolitical reasons. If you show me one source that says about the Slavs, I will give you $ 1000. Bulgarians - Thracians wrote Roman historians.
@@Stoyan_72 many other countries lost a huge amount of land too for example the Qing dynasty the kingdom of mexico the Eastern Roman Empire (Byzantine Empire) the Ottoman Empire the Persian Empire and so on there are many other civilazations who lost much more land than the Bulgarian Empire did (the first or the second one) ps:I realy like the borders of bulgaria in 2:54
@@Δούρειος_96 Yeah I tried to talk people in restoring them but nobody got on board :/ Can't imagine why. I can;t get what my fellow country man was saying, but my late history teacher always repeated - We are the only caountry that borders it's own territories, but even that's not entirely true. You know which ERE's borders I like the most? 555AD
@@Δούρειος_96 Yeah, I'm not actually bothered by the losing of the macedonian territory. But all the stealing of ancient greek history... that's something really messed up.
Volga Bulgaria (Tatar: Идел Болгар, Chuvash: Атӑлҫи Пӑлхар) or Volga-Kama Bulghar, was a historic Bulgar[2][3][4] state that existed between the 7th and 13th centuries around the confluence of the Volga and Kama River, in what is now European Russia. Volga Bulgaria was a multi-ethnic state with large numbers of Turkic Bulgars, a variety of Finnic and Ugric peoples, and many East Slavs.[5] The very strategic position of Volga Bulgaria allowed it to create a monopoly between the trade of Arabs, Norse and Avars.[6]
The endangered Chuvash language is the only living representative of the Bulgar branch, the earliest offshoot of Proto-Turkic (PT), which is in many respects opposed to the Common Turkic (CT) languages. Evidence from Chuvash is of vital importance in reconstructing Proto-Turkic, particularly its phonology. Chuvash represents characteristic features of the Bulgar branch, such as two types of rhotacism (PT *ŕ > CT /z/, Bulg. /r/; PT *δ > Bulg. /r/ with /j/, /d/, /t/ and /z/ in different subgroups of CT), lambdacism (PT *λ > CT /š/, Bulg. /l/), the “Bulgar palatalization” (PT *s- > Bulg. /š-/ and PT *t- > Bulg. /č-/ in certain contexts) etc. (Dybo 2010; Róna-Tas & Berta 2011). These correspondences provide a more complete reconstruction of the Proto-Turkic phonological system.
Interestingly enough, Bulgaria was the only axis power to gain territory from the settlement of WWII. As part of the cost of joining the axis, Romania agreed to lose parts of its own territory in exchange for territory in Moldova and Ukraine. This meant giving southern Dobruja to Bulgaria, as well as giving Transylvania to Hungary. As a result the USSR just let Bulgaria keep it.
Of course not! Volga Bulgaria is the mother of Kazan Tatarstan. U got it backwards! Tataria is the old name of Russia. Tatarstan is the father of Russia!!! Такие вот дела, товарищи;)))
@@taijituofdeath2210 Okay. From the beginning of the 20th century, it is believed that modern Tatars are descended from the Volga Bulgars, Kipchaks and Finno-Ugrians. Now historians argue when the Tatar nation was formed before or after the Mongol invasion. Some argue that the Tatar nation was formed during the time of the Volga Bulgaria, others that the Tatar nation is a synthesis of the Volga Bulgars, Kipchaks and Finno-Ugrians, who, while in the Golden Horde, mixed together and got a common language. In the 16-18 century, the Tatar nation was divided into two parts, the Tatars, who were part of Russia and the Crimean Tatars, who were in close cultural and political relations with the Ottoman Empire. Now you know where you made a mistake? P.S. Sorry my english
Bulgaria: *tries to take Constantinople like 10 times and fucking dies* Bulgaria: *comes back to life just to try to take Constantinople a few more times and fucking dies* Fucking legend
well we🇧🇬 saved constantinople/europe from the Arabs 717 so without us there wouldn’t be almost no christian countries in europe and let’s not forget how we saved it again from the mongols late 1223 (or 1224) but yeah we won the Battle of Constantinople 922 and our name for it was: ‘’Tsarigrad’’ basically means the city of the Tsar-King
Bulgarians and Serbs have a rich history in the Balkans...Unlike those fake slavic so called macedonians who are linguistically and ethnically Bulgarian But like to think they have links to ancient Greek antiquity...They wished....
Горда Стара планина, до ней Дунава синей, слънце Тракия огрява, над Пирина пламеней. Родино...Мила Родино, ти си земен рай, твойта хубост, твойта прелест, ах, те нямат край. Паднаха борци безчет, за народа наш любим, майко, дай ни мъжка сила, пътя им да продължим. Родино...Мила Родино, ти си земен рай, твойта хубост, твойта прелест, ах, те нямат край.
@@SaintPanzerker nope . 913-927 Byzantines + Serbia went to destroy Bulgaria also in 894-896 Byzantines+Hungary went to destroy Bulgaria both times Bulgaria raised itself to the Top . No support from Byzantium
@@tylerellis9097 yes . But you don't complain about the Slavic ones . Kubrat arranged the Bulgar migration into Balkans with Byzantine emperor Justinian and he agreed . But when he died ...the next Byzantine emperors ignored the proposal . The Khazars forced the Bulgars to migrate . Some tribes went to Italy, Hungary, FYROM and Volga (Bulgaria)
Nikov is the first Bulgarian historian to pay special attention to, and attri bute great significance to, the Turkic components in the Bulgarian ethnogen esis (i.e., after the Bulgars) and among the ruling aristocracy. He elaborated on the issue of the "Turkic element's" influence upon Bulgarian history in a 1928 unpublished manuscript (delivered as a public lecture). Nikov began with the following policy-setting statement: There is no period in our history on which the Turkic element did not exert its strongest influence and did not leave the deepest traces in the development of our people. [...] None of the Balkan peoples has experi enced the Turkic influence so strongly as our people, The Turkic pressure began from Central Asia and had two directions to the northwest through southern Russia, and to the southwest through Persia and Asia Minor. The Bulgarian state was founded due to one of the Turkic peoples, the Bulgars, who themselves joined a number of Turkic tribal alliances (of Huns, Kutrigurs, Utigurs, Avars, and Khazars). During Byzantine rule, the Turkic Pechenegs and Uz came from the north; many of them crossed the Danube and were assimilated by the Bulgarian people. Then came the Cumans, without whose decisive help the uprising of Asenevtsi would hardly have succeeded. Thus, just as the First Bulgarian Kingdom was founded with the help of the Turkic Bulgars, the Second Kingdom was founded with "the decisive collabora tion of the Turkic Cumans."129 Not only did Cumans settle south of the Danube and become assimilated and absorbed by the Slavic-Bulgarian people, but they were also of great significance politically in the Second Kingdom, whose dynas ties all had Cuman blood in them. There were also many Bulgarian boyars of Cuman origin, including Balic in Dobrudzha. It could even be said that the Cumans acquired a dominant position in the political life of the state. 130 There followed the influence of the Mongol Tartars, who even supplied one Bulgarian king, Chaka. But of greatest importance were the Ottoman and Seljuk Turks, who conquered the Balkans from Asia Minor. Concerning the Cumans, Nikov considers the "transfusion of blood" from Turkic "elements" an asset, a means of rejuvenating and strengthening the "race" and enhancing the vitality of the Bulgarian people (in contrast with the conquering Turks).
Hidja.I ,m read 📚 History.In 6 century maybe asimilacion Turik .Old Great Bulgarian empire for Ernak is 1/2 for Hunic Empire but Gotturik haganat Conquest .Bulgaria 😉 Bilgarian peole Scity indoiranic etic bro.
DMasterplanL, for may have or not have blinding 15k Bulgarians of course no first hand sources report this or suggest their was that many Bulgarians to blind.
He is famous for being the BYzantine emperor who conquered the Bulgarian kingdom but he did have a lot of allies (Croatia, Serbia, Hungary, Russians maybe)
Aleksandar Kan, Serbia, Croatia and Venice certainly but Serbia and Venice were Roman vassals and Croatia knew who won would dominate the Balkans. Hungary nah Hungary and Byzantium were always enemies and The Rus did give Basil men but didn’t intervene independently cause they didn’t feel like dying in Bulgaria again. All in all Bulgaria being annexed was a win for Both sides. The Bulgarian people got to keep their Patriarch, pay taxes in kind not coin, received protection against the Turkic raiders, were given high positions in government and the Military and were even allowed to settle where ever they wanted in Anatolia. Byzantium got the Danube Border back, A Civilized Christian population that could counteract the growing Armenian faction in politics. Overland trade Routes to the Rus and A extensive Manpower boost in the Army that saved Byzantium when the Normans invaded. It’s crazy how quickly the Bulgarians integrated into the Byzantine Military and Society to the point John Komnenos was of direct descent from Samuel by his mother. Then The Angeloi screwed it all up just like the rest of the Empire.
The "Bulgars" were originally a Turkic people who migrated to present day Bulgaria (and gave it their name) from the Eurasian steppes. You can simply type Bulgar in Wikipedia and learn this basic fact.
oficial historiography has accepted the communist theory which was the one of our best historians " Zlatarski"who was the first to do a research on the Bulgars at the beggining of the 20th century. They didn't however possess our modern technology to do a more decent research. The iranic theory is only about 20 years old. And Litteraly all of our historians some of whom used to support the turkic theory has accepted it. The theory started to earn even more popularity in the recent years among historians, after a lot of new archaeological discoviries ,discovery of new sources and a better anthropological testing of the Bulgars and modern Bulgarians was done.
Nope Volga Bulgaria is way farther north If you are talking about Old Great Bulgaria, then yes kinda. The Khazars invaded Old Great Bulgaria and so the Volga, Danube and Kuber's Bulgaria was created
Old Great Bulgaria or Great Bulgaria (Byzantine Greek: Παλαιά Μεγάλη Βουλγαρία, Palaiá Megálē Voulgaría), also often known by the Latin names Magna Bulgaria[3] and Patria Onoguria ("Onogur land"),[4] was a 7th century state formed by the Onogur Bulgars on the western Pontic-Caspian steppe (modern southern Ukraine and southwest Russia).[5] Great Bulgaria was originally centred between the Dniester and lower Volga. The original capital was Phanagoria[6] on the Taman Peninsula between the Black and Azov seas. In the mid-7th century, Great Bulgaria expanded west to include Avar territory and was centered in Poltava. During the late 7th century, however, an Avar-Slavic alliance in the west, and Khazars in the east, defeated the Bulgars and the Great Bulgaria disintegrated. Successor states included Volga Bulgaria and the First Bulgarian Empire .
Excuse me, but a small detail might be mentioned. The picture that you used right in the beginning, in the first 4 seconds, is a painting that depicts the battle of Grivita, in 1877, when romanian and russian forces attacked the Ottoman empire in the war that romanians call today, the ”Independence war”. I don't know how exactly this is related to the History of Bulgaria, except the fact that the city of Grivita and most of the battles where on Bulgarian territory. Except that, everybody in that painting is either a turk or a romanian. I will link the picture below(just delete one space before org): ro.wikipedia. org/wiki/Asediul_Plevnei#/media/File:Grivita_1877.jpg
CORRECT! The picture displays the fight between the Romanians and Turks near the Bulgarian village of Grivitsa, during the Siege of Pleven (Plevna), in the Russo--Turkish War of 1877--1878. The said war brought freedom and de facto independence to some of the Bulgarian lands. Romania helped Russia to defeat the Turks in Bulgaria. Regards from an American descendant of Bulgarians from Aegean Macedonia and Pirot!
Nikephoros I stated that Kubrat was lord of the Onogundurs, Theophanes referred to them as Onogundur Bulgars and Constantine VIIremarked that the Bulgars formerly called themselves Onogundurs. Variations of the name include Onoguri, Onoghuri, Onghur, Ongur, Onghuri, Onguri, Onogundur, Unogundur, and Unokundur.
Old Bulgarian Koşuk: Etil suwı aka turur Kaya tübi kaka turur Balık telim baka turur Kölün takı küşerür Now Turkish Koşuk İtil suyu akar durur Kaya dibini oyar durur Bütün balıklar baka durur Gölü bile taşırırlar
@@Zingam is it stupid to tell him the ONLY way to get his soul saved from Hellfire? JESUS is the only way I know that we don't see JESUS but He is real and the Bible is the word of God
Volga Bulgars living today as Chuvash. Cuvashs are speaking Turkic. Origially Bulgars had Turkic origin and they turned to Slav. Even "Bulgar" word is Turkish. And look their first kings' name. Also they Turkish.
Doctor T'Soni but only Chuvash is in similar language group with ancient Bulgarian. У чувашей и татар язык похож только чуть-чуть, хоть оба и в тюркской семье
@@olumluhayatbugunvarsinyari1326 Zonja Fatlinda Islami You are not a Turk so why do you pretend to be a Turk? You are a 12 year old Albanian girl who lives with her parents in Gostivar
@@Kunnis Lol yeah, the second time we were not even trying. You at least fought against the commies. I would like a favor could you provide me with something on medieval romanian history to read cuz we hear do not even touch the subject.
@@doomdrake123 ua-cam.com/video/vwNUzWne1a8/v-deo.html This is a brife history of Romania, there is more than medieval time, but I think you would like it
Actually here in the video when the secon bulgarian empire ''colapsed'' it didnt collapse, because they still held on to one castle up until the ottomans conquered them in like 1446 or something.
You must correct the video there has been a brother from Old Bulgaria who left and founded another Bulgaria in present-day Macedonia, Albania and another brother from Old Bulgaria founded another country in Italy for all the Apennines.
The Turkic languages are clearly interrelated, showing close similarities in phonology, morphology, and syntax. Historically, they split into two types early on, Common Turkic and Bolgar Turkic. The language of the Proto-Bolgars, reportedly similar to the Khazar language, belonged to the latter type. Its only modern representative is Chuvash, which originated in Volga Bolgarian and exhibits archaic features. The Proto-Bulgarians had a somewhat eventful history prior to their arrival on the Balkan Peninsula. The earliest written sources indicate that they inhabited the region to the north of the Caucasus in the 4th century A.D. and had close contact with the Georgians and Armenians. They belonged to the Turkic ethno-linguistic group and their language resembled that of the Huns, Khazars, Avars and other tribes. (How the bulgarian state was founded-Dimiter Angelov) The Oghur, or Onogur or Ogur[3] languages (also known as Bulgar, Pre-Proto-Bulgar,[4]or Lir-Turkic and r-Turkic), are a branch of the Turkic language family. The only extant member of the group is the Chuvash language. The first to branch off from the Turkic family, the Oghur languages show significant divergence from other Turkic languages, which all share a later common ancestor. Languages from this family were spoken in some nomadic tribal confederations, such as those of the Onogurs or Ogurs, Bulgars, and Khazars.[5]Some scholars consider Hunnic a similar language[6] and refer to this extended grouping as Hunno-Proto-Bulgarian.[7] The only surviving language from this linguistic group is believed to be Chuvash.Omeljan Pritsak in his study "The Hunnic Language of the Attila Clan" (1982)[10] concluded that the language of the Bulgars was from the family of the Hunnic languages, as he calls the Oghur languages.[11] According to Antoaneta Granberg : " the data is insufficient to clearly distinguish Huns, Avars and Bulgars one from another" - introduction, the second paragraph Bolgars are still Turk in Volga region.Mahmud al kashgari wrote bulgar language in his diwan lughat al turk before 1000 years. Even ilovelanguages made video about bulgar language(volga bulgar poet from Diwan Lughat al Turk)
@@olumluhayatbugunvarsinyari1326 Fatlinda Islami you are not a Turk so why do you pretend to be a Turk? You are 12 year old Albanian girl who lives with her parents in Gostivar
Bulgaria is oldest country in Europe. Bulgaria is first national state in Europe which adopt Christianity and Bulgarian church became first national independent church in Europe in year 927. Bulgarians created Bulgarian Civilization with Bulgarian language, Bulgarian alphabet Cyrillic and Orthodox Christianity. Bulgarians spread Christianity and the Bible, translated into Bulgarian language and written in Cyrillic, among the so-called "Slavs" and incorporated most of the "Slavs" into Bulgarian civilization, including the Russians. All so-called "Slavic" languages are created on the basis of Bulgarian language. Russian language and so-called "Slavic" languages on the Balkans are dialects of Bulgarian language. Today about 300 million people in Eurasia including Russia use Bulgarian writing system Cyrillic as the official alphabet. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Bulgarian_Empire en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simeon_I_of_Bulgaria en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyrillic_script en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Bulgarian_Empire
Διονύσιος 1. You are being racist for no reason 2. Greece was the not the strongest it was the Ottomans and Bulgars. The one which was strong was the Byzantium empire not Greece
@@DionysiosPhryx they were stronger than greeks and defeated them in most of the wars, also they helped the Romans during the Arab invasion of Constantinople
to make a long story short some turks believe that bulgaria is or at least was originally turkic. these turks are most of the time also part of the pan-turkic-irredentism and therefore have an interest in videos concerning bulgaria, primarily its history.
@@kavallerie1436 at the premise that everybody here is speaking about the Bulgaria in the balkans You could only say that about the nobility of the very first Bulgaria (the pagan Bulgaria wich was not an empire) and even that is disputed. Someone else in the comments mentioned that the first bulgar tribes could be actually of indo-iranian origin. Ehter way the thing what annoys me is, that, because of the circumstance that the nobility of the first bulgars where maybe of turkic origin, many of these irriedentist turks belive that therefor Bulgarians are turks, which is complete nonsense
Volga Bulgars living today as Chuvash. Cuvashs are speaking Turkic. Origially Bulgars had Turkic origin and they turned to Slav. Even "Bulgar" word is Turkish. And look their first kings' name. Also they Turkish.
Johnny Sins, Krum is best before him the Byzantines we’re slowly but surely pushing the bolghars out of the Balkains. After 4 khans being deposed for getting their asses kicked by Constantine vi he was a welcome sight.
Bulgarian Ostrogoth, he helped save the day, the Byzantines were already winning the siege when the Bulgars arrive as they had already destroyed the Muslim fleet and food supply.
Bulgarian Ostrogoth, I never never heard anyone call him the savior of Europe, what west called him that? Most people who knew this siege didn’t even know the Bolghars were involved, infact western historians of the time don’t even mention the Bolghars in the siege. Nothing against him but I can’t find any historical evidence for your claim outside Bulgaria.
Bulgarian Ostrogoth, except nobody does even today, people always talk about Byzantium being the shield of Christianity not the Bolghars. My guy I honestly think your talking out of your ass here. Show me proof of your statement outside of Bulgaria. I can find no evidence of what you say.
As the number of evidence of linguistic, ethnographic and socio-political nature show that Bulgars belonged to the group of Turkic peoples.[36][24][26][30] The Bulgars (also Bolgars or proto-Bulgarians[40]) were a semi-nomadic people of Turkic descent, originally from Central Asia, who from the 2nd century onwards dwelled in the steppes north of the Caucasus and around the banks of river Volga (then Itil). en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Bulgaria Bulgars (< Turkic bulgha- ‘to mix, stir up, disturb’, i.e. ‘rebels’) A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian-Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiongnu (late 3rd cent. ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-820 Many Slavic tribes lived within the boundaries of the state, together with the proto-Bulgarians, a tribe of Turkic origin that had settled in the Balkan Peninsula at the end of the 7th century. www.britannica.com/biography/Boris-I The Bulgars were a Turkic tribal confederation that gave rise to the Balkan Bulgar and Volga Bulgar states.The ethynonym derives from the Turkish bulgha-,”to stir,mix,disturb,confuse.” books.google.com.tr/books?id=c788wWR_bLwC&pg=PA354&redir_esc=y&hl=tr#v=onepage&q=Bulgars&f=false (Harvard University Press) The Volga Bulgars, a Turkish tribe then living on the east bank of the Volga River, ... the laws of Islam to the Bulgars, who had recently converted to the religion. www.bookrags.com/research/ahmad-ibn-fadlan-ued/#gsc.tab=0
Indo European is just a language family created after 1800. The Bulgars were not Bulgarian(south slavic) speaking, they were Bulgar Oghuric(western turkic) speaking. Same as the Huns, Avars, Sabirs, Khazars etc.
@@nietzsche193 Only according to PanTurk Mythology Bulgarians were never Turkic 1.Give Primary Sources that show Tengrinism in Bulgaria 2.Give Primary Sources that show the name Bulgarian comes from Bulgamak
@@petertodorov1792 already Bulgarians were never Turks. They're newbie nation, with old root. Who taken their name from their rulers, from the Bulgars. Citizen of Bulgars was Bulgarians. Turks are eroded, only the Slavs remained. With the name of Bulgarian.
Nikov is the first Bulgarian historian to pay special attention to, and attri bute great significance to, the Turkic components in the Bulgarian ethnogen esis (i.e., after the Bulgars) and among the ruling aristocracy. He elaborated on the issue of the "Turkic element's" influence upon Bulgarian history in a 1928 unpublished manuscript (delivered as a public lecture). Nikov began with the following policy-setting statement: There is no period in our history on which the Turkic element did not exert its strongest influence and did not leave the deepest traces in the development of our people. [...] None of the Balkan peoples has experi enced the Turkic influence so strongly as our people, The Turkic pressure began from Central Asia and had two directions to the northwest through southern Russia, and to the southwest through Persia and Asia Minor. The Bulgarian state was founded due to one of the Turkic peoples, the Bulgars, who themselves joined a number of Turkic tribal alliances (of Huns, Kutrigurs, Utigurs, Avars, and Khazars). During Byzantine rule, the Turkic Pechenegs and Uz came from the north; many of them crossed the Danube and were assimilated by the Bulgarian people. Then came the Cumans, without whose decisive help the uprising of Asenevtsi would hardly have succeeded. Thus, just as the First Bulgarian Kingdom was founded with the help of the Turkic Bulgars, the Second Kingdom was founded with "the decisive collabora tion of the Turkic Cumans."129 Not only did Cumans settle south of the Danube and become assimilated and absorbed by the Slavic-Bulgarian people, but they were also of great significance politically in the Second Kingdom, whose dynas ties all had Cuman blood in them. There were also many Bulgarian boyars of Cuman origin, including Balic in Dobrudzha. It could even be said that the Cumans acquired a dominant position in the political life of the state. 130 There followed the influence of the Mongol Tartars, who even supplied one Bulgarian king, Chaka. But of greatest importance were the Ottoman and Seljuk Turks, who conquered the Balkans from Asia Minor. Concerning the Cumans, Nikov considers the "transfusion of blood" from Turkic "elements" an asset, a means of rejuvenating and strengthening the "race" and enhancing the vitality of the Bulgarian people (in contrast with the conquering Turks).
Sorry for the reupload. I needed to fix a few small mistakes I noticed / were pointed out to me. Enjoy!
EmperorTigerstar what is Volga Bulgaria in relation to modern Bulgaria
Preslav became capital in 893, until then it was Pliska. Big mistake but you've got time to fix it! :D
And before 1396 it's Vidin, not Vildin.
EmperorTigerstar History of the Netherlands every Year plz
@Fettleibiger dummer Kleinpenis Emskirchner Slavs do not exist in any historical source and were invented by Catherine the Great in the 18th century for geopolitical reasons. If you show me one source that says about the Slavs, I will give you $ 1000.
Bulgarians - Thracians wrote Roman historians in Latin and in Greek.
Actually you forgot to show our colonies in France Siberia, the North pole and Zimbabwe. Also our outposts on Mars, Jupiter and Paris.
Alеxander The Great Is Bulgarian I like your UA-cam name
Wasn't there one in IC1101?
also what about that expedition to the edge of the observable universe?
wait werent vladivostok xinjiang and fiji bulgarian too?!
Wtf u mean, whole world is colony of Bulgaria and god is bulgarian
don't forget in Mexico and pluto
Hungarian nationalists: *TrAnSyLvAnIa Is HuNgArY*
Romanian nationalists: *TrAnsYlVaNiA iS rOmAnIa*
Bulgaria:They are too young to know the truth...
Hell Maker Transylvania is actually sealand you uneducated fool
ıYı Tatar National Republic LMAO
@@diefahradsstadt350 it belongs to a free bavaria
Ottomans : You are all mine xD
I'd rather make Transylvania independent than admitting that it belongs to the Romani
*Insert controversial Balkan topic here*
"Macedonia has every right to exist"
-Someone who wants to burn themselves on fire,11/01/19
Yugoslavia > Current balkans states
Grabs popcorn
@@davilimalol4612 *North* Macedonia
@@HurricaneHunter03 Middle USA
Yugoslavia
Lvl 1 peasant
Lvl 35 kanasubigi
Lvl 50 knyaz
Lvl 99 tsar
Level 101 Makedonec
Lvl 99999999 Sashe velikiot
This is how Bulgaria works
level 100000 Great khan
Bulgar Khans
So Bulgaria isn’t from the Balkans?!
Where do you think Albanians are from? :P
Lol, when you want those likes back
Wayward Stoner I don’t want those likes back, I NEED THOSE LIKES BACK. Or I won’t be able to execute order 66
No one in the Balkans is really from here or should I use the Bullshit term ""native""
Bulgarian empire mapping I meant like Greeks lived in the Balkans since the beginning while Bulgars didn’t
Only 600 AD kids know when Bulgaria was Tengri.
Aiden A It was not, there isn’t a single source.
@Master Yoda but the people wich lived there where slavs wich therefor believed in Slavic gods
@Master Yoda the rulers of Göktürks were Iranic Saka origin form the Ashina tribe who worshipped Tengri not Turks or Mongols
@@yaqubleis6311 Most Nomadic peoples (excluding Khazars) worshipped Tengri until the Cumans converted to Islam in the 13th or so century.
dario First, I assume you mean Turkic. Second there isn’t any proof that we are turkic either, it’s a theory that hast been discarded by historians in the recent years.
Old Bulgaria: It was Bulgaria before Bulgaria was even in Bulgaria.
Old Bulgaria was Turkic
@Peter Todorov No, old Bulgaria is a Turkic state. (By the way, I am a direct descendant of the Volga Bulgars.)
@Артём what??
@Peter Todorov
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulgars
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulgar_language
@Peter Todorov Bulgars and Bulgarians are totally different.Bulgars were Turkic and Bulgarians are Slavic.
2:33 holy shit that's a wild name
Suomi-Finland Memes Traditionally in Muslim countries you add the entire name of your father to your own name.
Exemple: Ahmad’s son will be called Ali Ahmad, his son Muhammad Ali Ahmad, his son Ismail Muhammad Ali Ahmad ans so go on for ever until you get these three paragraphs names haha.
This is belong to the Arabic culture and traditions
His name is just Ibrahim
It's the same as abraham but in Arabic
Ibrahim bine Mohammad means that Ibrahim father was named mohammad
And Abu ishak
Its almost a nickname Means that Ibrahim son named Ishak
Abu Ishak Ibrahim son of Mohammed.
It's an Islamic/Turkic thing and still can be seen in Iceland for example where they still don't have last names.
Siegthorson means son of Siegthor for example
Samuel is pretty wild
It's Bulgarian.
The very few oversights (from my perspective) is the omission of the Bulgar state in Macedonia, which was founded by Kan Kouber, Kan Asparouh's brother, in the 670's, in the Plain of Pelagonia, as well as the size of the territory of the Bulgar Empire of Kan Koubrat, which bordered both the Black and Caspian Seas. Overall, an EXCELLENT VIDEO!
ye
Who would win?
- A Historical great power on 3 seas and a has create world wide writing system called cyrillic
- Some bois writing comments that bulgarians are turkic
the first one
Turks can go and suck a fat one
Bulgars =/= Bulgarians
Bulgars are turkic oghur people, bulgarians are assimilated slav people. You have nothing to do with turkic Bulgars.
Bulgarians aren’t Turkic, but the old Bulgars were a Turkic tribe who ruled over Slavs and eventually assimilated.
Historical great power ruled 3 seas . Bhahahahha
3:05
Top 10 saddest anime deaths
Lol
Cuman Power
Those guys are on the top 10 anime come backs
:'(
It was conquered by mongols
@@user-kz9yg8it3z aka. Mongol Empire (Mongolia)
Hello, great video, but I’d like to point out a mistake:
The Volga Bulgarian ruler who adopted islam was Almish, not Kotrag, so the title of khan was used until 922.
Edit: I forgot to mention that the capital was moved from Pliska to Preslav in 893, not in 693.
My friend there is no.mistake Kotrag was the creator of Volga Bulgaria after his death his son was the one who take Islam as religion
Volga Bulgar ruler not Bulgarian
@@papazataklaattiranimam 'bulgar' and 'bulgarian' are artificial terms in english used to differentiate the two different groups, when in reality both are the same group in both Bulgarian and Tatar (and other related turkic languages), so please spare your unjustified pedantry
@@Karget46856 btw Ilovelanguages made video about their language Volga Bulgar
@@papazataklaattiranimam 'Bolghar' as it is called in English is long extinct, though its, descendant, Chuvash survives. Neither distinguish between 'Bulgar' and 'Bulgarian'
This is the only video about "History of Bulgaria" that shows Volga Bulgaria as well! Good job!
Volga Bulgaria is Real Bulgaria unlike the fake danube bulgaria
PRAVI ISTORIČAR yes👍
As the number of evidence of linguistic, ethnographic and socio-political nature show that Bulgars belonged to the group of Turkic peoples.[36][24][26][30]
The Bulgars (also Bolgars or proto-Bulgarians[40]) were a semi-nomadic people of Turkic descent, originally from Central Asia, who from the 2nd century onwards dwelled in the steppes north of the Caucasus and around the banks of river Volga (then Itil).
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Bulgaria
Bulgars (< Turkic bulgha- ‘to mix, stir up, disturb’, i.e. ‘rebels’)
A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian-Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiongnu (late 3rd cent. ... ...
www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-820
Many Slavic tribes lived within the boundaries of the state, together with the proto-Bulgarians, a tribe of Turkic origin that had settled in the Balkan Peninsula at the end of the 7th century.
www.britannica.com/biography/Boris-I
The Bulgars were a Turkic tribal confederation that gave rise to the Balkan Bulgar and Volga Bulgar states.The ethynonym derives from the Turkish bulgha-,”to stir,mix,disturb,confuse.”
books.google.com.tr/books?id=c788wWR_bLwC&pg=PA354&redir_esc=y&hl=tr#v=onepage&q=Bulgars&f=false (Harvard University Press)
The Volga Bulgars, a Turkish tribe then living on the east bank of the Volga River, ... the laws of Islam to the Bulgars, who had recently converted to the religion.
www.bookrags.com/research/ahmad-ibn-fadlan-ued/#gsc.tab=0
Eastern Bulgars , Bulgars Ancient Turkic people originating in the region n and e of the Black Sea.
www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/balkan-states
Volga Bulgaria was a northeastern European Turkic state that formed during the 9th century and continued into the first four decades of the 13th century.
www.readcube.com/articles/10.1002/9781118455074.wbeoe009
www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/social-science/cultures/other/bulgars-eastern
referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopedia-of-slavic-languages-and-linguistics-online/*-COM_031941
referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopaedia-of-islam-3/bulghars-COM_23726
www.thefreedictionary.com/Proto-Bulgar+languages
encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Bolgars
xn--80ad7bbk5c.xn--p1ai/en/content/brief-history-suvar-bulgars
bulgarizdat.ru/index.php/book1/article1-1
Bulgars, Eastern bŭl´gärz, -gərz [key], Turkic-speaking people, who possessed a powerful state (10th-14th cent.) at the confluence of the Volga and the Kama, E European Russia.
The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6th ed. Copyright © 2012, Columbia University Press.
(Cambridge University Press)
books.google.com.tr/books?id=Ylz4fe7757cC&pg=PA8&lpg=PA8&dq=proto+bulgars&source=bl&ots=vvGsuu2J3g&sig=ACfU3U2YuPKKdgVQKhoUi2fyDiC99n4N_Q&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiRqIaDlNvmAhWM-yoKHW38DDI4FBDoATAAegQIBRAB#v=onepage&q=proto%20bulgars&f=false
Population genetic analysis indicated that Conquerors had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars.
www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-53105-5
hizliresim.com/stAHqu (Bulgar genetic proximity)
Thus supporting the view that Tatars may be descendents of ancient Bulgars.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22520580/
Onogur-Bulgars had been part of the Hunnic people, and after the death of Attila’s son Irnik, European Hun remains fused with the Onogurs.
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/250688v1.full
However, given the common Turkic genetic background of the Bulgars and Khazars, these ethnicities may be difficult to tell apart either archaeologically or genetically.
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2019.12.15.876912v1.full.pdf
Most Tatars trace their descent to Volga Bulgars, a medieval Turkic people who have inhabited the Middle Volga and lower Kama region.
online.ucpress.edu/search-results?page=1&q=Bulgars
Caucasus as the first Turkic peoples (Avars, Bulgars, Huns, Khazars, Pechenegs) arrived.
www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Exile
www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.2307/2849381?journalCode=spc
www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.2307/2853091?journalCode=spc
brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9789047423560/Bej.9789004163898.i-492_006.xml
Bulgars were Oghurs Turks and Bulgarians are Slavic.
The Turkic languages are clearly interrelated, showing close similarities in phonology, morphology, and syntax. Historically, they split into two types early on, Common Turkic and Bolgar Turkic. The language of the Proto-Bolgars, reportedly similar to the Khazar language, belonged to the latter type. Its only modern representative is Chuvash, which originated in Volga Bolgarian and exhibits archaic features.
The Proto-Bulgarians had a somewhat eventful history prior to their arrival on the Balkan Peninsula. The earliest written sources indicate that they inhabited the region to the north of the Caucasus in the 4th century A.D. and had close contact with the Georgians and Armenians. They belonged to the Turkic ethno-linguistic group and their language resembled that of the Huns, Khazars, Avars and other tribes.
(How the bulgarian state was founded-Dimiter Angelov)
The Oghur, or Onogur or Ogur[3] languages (also known as Bulgar, Pre-Proto-Bulgar,[4]or Lir-Turkic and r-Turkic), are a branch of the Turkic language family. The only extant member of the group is the Chuvash language. The first to branch off from the Turkic family, the Oghur languages show significant divergence from other Turkic languages, which all share a later common ancestor. Languages from this family were spoken in some nomadic tribal confederations, such as those of the Onogurs or Ogurs, Bulgars, and Khazars.[5]Some scholars consider Hunnic a similar language[6] and refer to this extended grouping as Hunno-Proto-Bulgarian.[7]
The only surviving language from this linguistic group is believed to be Chuvash.Omeljan Pritsak in his study "The Hunnic Language of the Attila Clan" (1982)[10] concluded that the language of the Bulgars was from the family of the Hunnic languages, as he calls the Oghur languages.[11]
According to Antoaneta Granberg : " the data is insufficient to clearly distinguish Huns, Avars and Bulgars one from another" - introduction, the second paragraph
Bolgars are still Turk in Volga region.Mahmud al kashgari wrote bulgar language in his diwan lughat al turk before 1000 years.
Even ilovelanguages made video about bulgar language(volga bulgar poet from Diwan Lughat al Turk)
Nice video. However I feel obliged to mention some of the misstakes.
1.Great Old Bulgaria bordered the Caspian sea.
2. North eastern Pannonia was fully incorporated into the Bulgarian empire in 827 after the campaigns of Kan Omurtag against the Franks in 828.
3. The proto Bulgarians didn't use the title Khan but Kanasubigi probably comming from the Indo-European *su- andbaga-, i.e. *su-baga (an equivallent of the Greek phrase ὁ ἐκ Θεοῦ ἄρχων, ho ek Theou archon, which is common in Bulgar inscriptions.) We used the title untill 864, then it was replaced by Prince (knyaz) and later Tsar ( emperor) in 913.
4. The first empire probably controlled Transylvania untill the 960s.
5. Wallachia and what would later become the principality of Moldavia were vassals and controlled by the Second Bulgarian empire between 1190 - 1242 and 1280 and 1322. Epirus was also a Bulgarian vassal in the period 1230-1240s
6. You forgot to mention the Despotate of Dobrudza (1356-1395).
7. The last Bulgarian fortress which feel to the Turks was Lovech which fell in 1422.
8. Bulgaria was a tatar vassal in the period 1286-99
I can't say much about Volga Bulgaria as the sources about its borders are really few.
Bulgarian empire mapping
🇩🇪🇦🇹🇭🇺🇧🇬🇹🇷
All of these words are not originally turkic but indo-european. There are still speculations about the origin of the tittle as you see it has an indoeuropean equivalent
I'm not sure you watched the video...half of these mistakes you claim aren't even in the video. For example Dobruja, the prince / tsar titles, etc. are shown.
Bulgarian empire mapping You really know your stuff. You should really become a history teacher.
@@EmperorTigerstar oops sorry I didn't notice that you changed those with the reupload
Volga Bulgaria is just chilling most of the time
@ uh... it was a joke
@@Pyro-MolochHa.
4:32 4:38
The only Axis nation to gain land after ww2
If I am not mistaken, the land was returned by Romania on diplomatic relation base about an year before WW2 started, it is just that it was not taken from Bulgaria due to it switching to the Allies side after it forfeited from the war in an attempt not to get fully screwed the way it happened from WW1 where it only wanted the Macedonian region back due to the majority of people being bulgarians in the region at the time.
@@petkosamodivekov534 huge parts of Transylvania were also annexed by Hungary in 1940, but they had to give it back after the war...
It was returned peacefully,not by War.All the territories gained by war were lost
Bulgaria is nice place.
Greetings from Germany my bulgarian friends
Viele Grüße auch nach Deutschland aus Bulgarien
*Jас не сум геj* warum kannst du deutsch?
@@m080m5 ich habe Deutsch in der Schule
Bulgaria ain't a nice place lmao 🤷🏽♂️🤮😂
@@r6mzy You are right. Its very nice!
It's fascinating to see how the names in the two Bulgarias diverged from each other.
Volga Bulgarian is Turkic , Danube Bulgarian is a Asimilitted by Slavs
Love to Bulgaria from Poland!
Love to our Slavic brothers from Bulgaria. Hope you recover your lost lands from the communists.
Thanks
Thanks :)
@@storm_raider- Slavic?
Не съм от България, но обичам България!
While Everybody is looking at the Bulgarian Empires Volga Bulgaria is just chilling out.
He is Bulgar empire not bulgarian
@Peter Todorov
Nikephoros I stated that Kubrat was lord of the Onogundurs, Theophanes referred to them as Onogundur Bulgars and Constantine VIIremarked that the Bulgars formerly called themselves Onogundurs. Variations of the name include Onoguri, Onoghuri, Onghur, Ongur, Onghuri, Onguri, Onogundur, Unogundur, and Unokundur.
@@emirhan1694 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ziezi
@@dianairincheva9063 Turkic Bulgars
@@papazataklaattiranimam
Why does Turkey betray the Uighurs?
Volga Bulgaria: Turkic-speaking and Muslim.
First Bulgarian Empire: Slavic-speaking and Christian.
Turkic people
-asian looking dudes with their own pagan religion and culture.
- Modern Turks a mishmash of assimilated anatolain greeks, armenians and Kurds with arabic religion and culture
Bulgarians are Thracians wrote roman historians.
As an introduction, I want to present some ancient sources which speak about Bulgarian people:
- Herodotus writes that the Getae are Thracian people.
- Strabo writes that the Moesi and the Getae are from the same family and speak the same language.
- Cassius Dio writes that the Getae tribe are part of the Scythians.
- Procopius writes that the Getae and Sarmatians are from the same origin.
- Stephanus of Byzantium claims that the Scythians are Thracian people.
V-VI century
- Ioannes Malalas: "The so called Achilles went with Atreidai and led his own army of three thousand men, then called Myrmidons and now Bulgarians" - page 97 www.documentacatholicaomnia....raphia_(CSHB_Dindorfii_Recensione),_GR_LT.pdf picture from the text in Greek: facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10150315761464099&set=o.122376701166845&type=1&theater
- Michael Attaleiates: History - ''the Moesi ... are certainly Bulgarians who later received their new name ... Bulgarians Myrmidons ..."
- John Zonaras: ''Paeonians - Latins or Thracian people of Macedonia. These are so-called Paeonians. Paeonians were Bulgarians. "
- Johannes Tzetza: ''Pyros and Akamas (native) of the Thracian Hellespont, Maronietza Evfimos son of Treziius, Pirehmie, who was of the Paeonians they were all from the Bulgarians, from those of the river Axios, also called Vardar'' (see photo with Greek text).
XI century
- ''Bulgarians who are named Thracians according to the previous (old) monuments'' - „Hinc iter aggressi per fines Vulgariorum, quos vocitant Thracas, ut habent monumenta priorum“ - Fulcher of Chartres, a French priest, (a description of the first crusade in 1096)
III-IV century
- Mavro Orbin cites evidence of Marcus Aurelius Kasiodor that Bulgarians fought with the Romans about 390 AD.
- Cassiodorus writes that the Bulgarians are old Moesian or Illyrian people
- Ennodius Ticinensis (473-524, Bishop, court historian of the Gothic King Theodoric) indicate that Bulgarians are old Moesian and Illyrian people.
- 4th century map (see photo) by St. Jerome (331-420) - Mesia hec & Vulgaria (Misia here and Bulgaria). It is composed by even older maps - Bishop Eusebius of Caesarea (270 to 33, called the "father of church history." The map is preserved in a copy of the 12th century. letopisec.blog.bg/photos/123281/original/Karta_Ieronim_4_vek22222.jpg
I-II century
-Flavius Josephus writes ''Dacians called Bulgarians''
In addition:
- Ravennatis Anоnymi Cosmographia: „Inter vero Tratiam vel Macedoniam et Mysiam inferiorem modo Bulgari habitant, qui ex super scripta maiore Scythia egressi sunt.” upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5a/Karte_Ravennat.jpg
www.venstar.de/extra/App0003a.bmp
- Demetrios Chomateno: Brief Life of Clement Ohridski - ''This great Father was a native from the European Moesians, people usually known as Bulgarians. They were displaced in the old days by the military power of Alexander of placement of Brusa, Olympus to the North Atlantic and the Dead Sea, and after a long time with terrible army crossed the Danube and invaded all the neighboring areas: Pannonia and Dalmatia, Thrace and Illyricum, and and much of Macedonia and Thessaly''
Bulgarians are not Turkic, but Bulgar tribe was. Bulgarians got their name from Bulgar tribe. Just like Russians got their name from Germanic Rus' tribe. Therefore modern Bulgarians are not related to Old Great Bulgaria and Volga Bulgaria.
If all Anatolian Turks are Turkified Greeks, then who assimilated them?
@@tnritogyabgu3475 The Seljuqs perhaps(I don't agree with the notion of anatolian Turks being turkified Greeks btw, just the anatolian greeks got assimilated in the process of islamification). Also the Rus weren't a germanic tribe. Instead the Rus people(many tribes) were Slavic with a lot of mix with Scandinavians(Vikings)
@Johnny Sins There is a difference between Turk*IC* and Turk*ISH*. Modern Turks have the adjective Turkish, while people who originated from roughly Central Asia(don't quote me on that) are considered Turkic.
One Bulgaria, two Bulgarias, dead Bulgaria, new Bulgaria.
As the number of evidence of linguistic, ethnographic and socio-political nature show that Bulgars belonged to the group of Turkic peoples.[36][24][26][30]
The Bulgars (also Bolgars or proto-Bulgarians[40]) were a semi-nomadic people of Turkic descent, originally from Central Asia, who from the 2nd century onwards dwelled in the steppes north of the Caucasus and around the banks of river Volga (then Itil).
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Bulgaria
Bulgars (< Turkic bulgha- ‘to mix, stir up, disturb’, i.e. ‘rebels’)
A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian-Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiongnu (late 3rd cent. ... ...
www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-820
Many Slavic tribes lived within the boundaries of the state, together with the proto-Bulgarians, a tribe of Turkic origin that had settled in the Balkan Peninsula at the end of the 7th century.
www.britannica.com/biography/Boris-I
The Bulgars were a Turkic tribal confederation that gave rise to the Balkan Bulgar and Volga Bulgar states.The ethynonym derives from the Turkish bulgha-,”to stir,mix,disturb,confuse.”
books.google.com.tr/books?id=c788wWR_bLwC&pg=PA354&redir_esc=y&hl=tr#v=onepage&q=Bulgars&f=false (Harvard University Press)
The Volga Bulgars, a Turkish tribe then living on the east bank of the Volga River, ... the laws of Islam to the Bulgars, who had recently converted to the religion.
www.bookrags.com/research/ahmad-ibn-fadlan-ued/#gsc.tab=0
Eastern Bulgars , Bulgars Ancient Turkic people originating in the region n and e of the Black Sea.
www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/balkan-states
Volga Bulgaria was a northeastern European Turkic state that formed during the 9th century and continued into the first four decades of the 13th century.
www.readcube.com/articles/10.1002/9781118455074.wbeoe009
www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/social-science/cultures/other/bulgars-eastern
referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopedia-of-slavic-languages-and-linguistics-online/*-COM_031941
referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopaedia-of-islam-3/bulghars-COM_23726
www.thefreedictionary.com/Proto-Bulgar+languages
encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Bolgars
xn--80ad7bbk5c.xn--p1ai/en/content/brief-history-suvar-bulgars
bulgarizdat.ru/index.php/book1/article1-1
Bulgars, Eastern bŭl´gärz, -gərz [key], Turkic-speaking people, who possessed a powerful state (10th-14th cent.) at the confluence of the Volga and the Kama, E European Russia.
The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6th ed. Copyright © 2012, Columbia University Press.
(Cambridge University Press)
books.google.com.tr/books?id=Ylz4fe7757cC&pg=PA8&lpg=PA8&dq=proto+bulgars&source=bl&ots=vvGsuu2J3g&sig=ACfU3U2YuPKKdgVQKhoUi2fyDiC99n4N_Q&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiRqIaDlNvmAhWM-yoKHW38DDI4FBDoATAAegQIBRAB#v=onepage&q=proto%20bulgars&f=false
Population genetic analysis indicated that Conquerors had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars.
www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-53105-5
hizliresim.com/stAHqu (Bulgar genetic proximity)
Thus supporting the view that Tatars may be descendents of ancient Bulgars.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22520580/
Onogur-Bulgars had been part of the Hunnic people, and after the death of Attila’s son Irnik, European Hun remains fused with the Onogurs.
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/250688v1.full
However, given the common Turkic genetic background of the Bulgars and Khazars, these ethnicities may be difficult to tell apart either archaeologically or genetically.
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2019.12.15.876912v1.full.pdf
Most Tatars trace their descent to Volga Bulgars, a medieval Turkic people who have inhabited the Middle Volga and lower Kama region.
online.ucpress.edu/search-results?page=1&q=Bulgars
Caucasus as the first Turkic peoples (Avars, Bulgars, Huns, Khazars, Pechenegs) arrived.
www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Exile
www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.2307/2849381?journalCode=spc
www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.2307/2853091?journalCode=spc
brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9789047423560/Bej.9789004163898.i-492_006.xml
@@olumluhayatbugunvarsinyari1326
You look disgusting
Bulgarians always create Bulgaria as opposite of turkic people :-)) State move but name doesn't change. Danube Bulgaria (Asparukh's Bulgaria), Volga Bulgaria (Kotrag's Bulgaria), Kuber's Bulgaria, Kabardino - Balkaria (Bat Bayan's Bulgaria), Altzec's Bulgaria (Celle di Bulgheria) Bulgarians were formed ethnic group, Turks were not.
@@Bayganu Bulgarians found 0 state in history that’s why you kids stealing Turkish speaking Bulgar’s history😂😂
@@Bayganu
Kubrat (Gk. Kobratos, called Kurt in the Slavo-Turko-Bulgar Imennik or Name-List of Khans, 20, derived from Turkic quvrat ‘to bring together’)
Ruler of the *Onoghurs (Ononghundur) *Bulgars (c.605-42/65?). *John of *Nikiu (120, 47) reports that he became a Christian in ... ...
www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-2674
Nice history greeting from Hungary friends :))
The endangered Chuvash language is the only living representative of the Bulgar branch, the earliest offshoot of Proto-Turkic (PT), which is in many respects opposed to the Common Turkic (CT) languages. Evidence from Chuvash is of vital importance in reconstructing Proto-Turkic, particularly its phonology. Chuvash represents characteristic features of the Bulgar branch, such as two types of rhotacism (PT *ŕ > CT /z/, Bulg. /r/; PT *δ > Bulg. /r/ with /j/, /d/, /t/ and /z/ in different subgroups of CT), lambdacism (PT *λ > CT /š/, Bulg. /l/), the “Bulgar palatalization” (PT *s- > Bulg. /š-/ and PT *t- > Bulg. /č-/ in certain contexts) etc. (Dybo 2010; Róna-Tas & Berta 2011). These correspondences provide a more complete reconstruction of the Proto-Turkic phonological system.
@Борис К. cry harder Lol
@@kaldirdimgobegi
Why does Turkey betray the Uighurs?
@@kaldirdimgobegi Greetings from the uyghurs!
Magyarországnak nincs saját történelme
Also, for you dear macedonians, you can clearly see how your "country" was a part from Bulgaria for about 1000 years
you are talking about vardarskans
macedonians are greeks
@@TheHunterOfYharnam greeks are christian turks + albanians + itailans + germans + gypsys + arabs your eth is like soap
We were all under Ottoman occupation for 500 years, are we Turks?
@@TheHunterOfYharnam they speak a slavic language tho lmao?
@@pavii5263 lmao, tell me something that gives proof of the existance of your ''ethnicity'' before 19th/20th century
Respect to Bulgaria From Iran
moeharvard
As the number of evidence of linguistic, ethnographic and socio-political nature show that Bulgars belonged to the group of Turkic peoples.[36][24][26][30]
The Bulgars (also Bolgars or proto-Bulgarians[40]) were a semi-nomadic people of Turkic descent, originally from Central Asia, who from the 2nd century onwards dwelled in the steppes north of the Caucasus and around the banks of river Volga (then Itil).
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Bulgaria
Bulgars (< Turkic bulgha- ‘to mix, stir up, disturb’, i.e. ‘rebels’)
A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian-Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiongnu (late 3rd cent. ... ...
www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-820
Many Slavic tribes lived within the boundaries of the state, together with the proto-Bulgarians, a tribe of Turkic origin that had settled in the Balkan Peninsula at the end of the 7th century.
www.britannica.com/biography/Boris-I
The Bulgars were a Turkic tribal confederation that gave rise to the Balkan Bulgar and Volga Bulgar states.The ethynonym derives from the Turkish bulgha-,”to stir,mix,disturb,confuse.”
books.google.com.tr/books?id=c788wWR_bLwC&pg=PA354&redir_esc=y&hl=tr#v=onepage&q=Bulgars&f=false (Harvard University Press)
The Volga Bulgars, a Turkish tribe then living on the east bank of the Volga River, ... the laws of Islam to the Bulgars, who had recently converted to the religion.
www.bookrags.com/research/ahmad-ibn-fadlan-ued/#gsc.tab=0
Eastern Bulgars , Bulgars Ancient Turkic people originating in the region n and e of the Black Sea.
www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/balkan-states
Volga Bulgaria was a northeastern European Turkic state that formed during the 9th century and continued into the first four decades of the 13th century.
www.readcube.com/articles/10.1002/9781118455074.wbeoe009
www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/social-science/cultures/other/bulgars-eastern
referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopedia-of-slavic-languages-and-linguistics-online/*-COM_031941
referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopaedia-of-islam-3/bulghars-COM_23726
www.thefreedictionary.com/Proto-Bulgar+languages
encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Bolgars
xn--80ad7bbk5c.xn--p1ai/en/content/brief-history-suvar-bulgars
bulgarizdat.ru/index.php/book1/article1-1
Bulgars, Eastern bŭl´gärz, -gərz [key], Turkic-speaking people, who possessed a powerful state (10th-14th cent.) at the confluence of the Volga and the Kama, E European Russia.
The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6th ed. Copyright © 2012, Columbia University Press.
(Cambridge University Press)
books.google.com.tr/books?id=Ylz4fe7757cC&pg=PA8&lpg=PA8&dq=proto+bulgars&source=bl&ots=vvGsuu2J3g&sig=ACfU3U2YuPKKdgVQKhoUi2fyDiC99n4N_Q&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiRqIaDlNvmAhWM-yoKHW38DDI4FBDoATAAegQIBRAB#v=onepage&q=proto%20bulgars&f=false
Population genetic analysis indicated that Conquerors had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars.
www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-53105-5
hizliresim.com/stAHqu (Bulgar genetic proximity)
Thus supporting the view that Tatars may be descendents of ancient Bulgars.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22520580/
Onogur-Bulgars had been part of the Hunnic people, and after the death of Attila’s son Irnik, European Hun remains fused with the Onogurs.
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/250688v1.full
However, given the common Turkic genetic background of the Bulgars and Khazars, these ethnicities may be difficult to tell apart either archaeologically or genetically.
www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2019.12.15.876912v1.full.pdf
Most Tatars trace their descent to Volga Bulgars, a medieval Turkic people who have inhabited the Middle Volga and lower Kama region.
online.ucpress.edu/search-results?page=1&q=Bulgars
Caucasus as the first Turkic peoples (Avars, Bulgars, Huns, Khazars, Pechenegs) arrived.
www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Exile
www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.2307/2849381?journalCode=spc
www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.2307/2853091?journalCode=spc
brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9789047423560/Bej.9789004163898.i-492_006.xml
@@olumluhayatbugunvarsinyari1326 why do you always have to copy and paste this to every nice comment? Get a life man...
@@olumluhayatbugunvarsinyari1326 Bulgarians were not turkic !
Who are we Bulgarians. Where is our homeland? What are our origins? The answers to these questions are lost in the distant past despite many theories and assumptions about our roots. One thing is certain - our ancestors lived in the lands of ancient Asia. It remains to be seen from what part of Asia exactly they came to Europe. In scientific circles the thesis on the Persian origins is finding more and more followers. These days, a Bulgarian scientific expedition has left for Iran in search of our roots.
Scientists are unanimous and believe that the Bulgarians today represent a genetic cocktail of different tribes and peoples who once lived in our territories for a shorter or longer time. The proof - there is no such thing as a definite type of Bulgarian - he could very well be brown or blond, with blue or brown eyes, tall and slender or short and stocky, etc. The Slavs, Thracians and Protobulgarians are obviously those who left the most important traces in the genetic profile of Bulgarians today.The researchers of the great scientific expedition are however convinced that in our veins the Protobulgare blood dominates and that our ancestors did not come from North Siberia as was believed for a long time, but from the territories of Iran and the Pamir massif. . If scientists can find any evidence for this hypothesis, the Bulgarians' version of Slavic identity will be denied. "In the days of socialism we were 'brothers' with the Russians and that is why our Slavic genes had to dominate. But in truth most Bulgarians do not have the characteristic features of Slavs and when they go to Russia they are asked which ex-Soviet republic they come from ”, explains Alexander Iliev, scientist of the expedition and director. scene from the documentary trilogy on the origins of the Bulgarians broadcast by Bulgarian National Television. This researcher believes that there are undeniable facts which prove the hypothesis of our Persian roots. As, for example, the bas-relief of the knight "Rag e modar", discovered in Afghanistan, bas-relief which in fact is at the origin of the bas-relief of the Knight of Madara near the town of Chumene in northern Bulgaria , dating from the 8th century. It is believed that the word "madar" originates from the word "modar" and is related to the worship of the god Mitra, who for his part is of Iranian origin. Monuments similar to the Knight of Madara have been found in Iran. Linguists, for their part, have discovered that in the Farsi language there are some 800 identical words with the Bulgarian language, some of these words having been adopted by the Bulgarian language via Arabic or Turkish. Let's not talk about the similarities in customs, religious beliefs, cultural traditions. And even :
“The curious coincidences are mainly in sciences like genetics, for example, explains Alexander Iliev. We managed to develop a non-representative sample of 58 DNA tests at Pamir which proved a great similarity between our peoples. Research on the anthropology of modern Bulgarian on the other hand shows 40% of coincidences with our distant ancestors of the Pamirs and Afghanistan. We are probably, therefore, part of this great Persian civilization! "
Members of the expedition will search Iran for almost a month of libraries and archives, have talks with historians and scholars to gather enough evidence for their hypothesis about our Persian origins. In fact, this is not the first such expedition. Alexander Iliev asserts that all the research so far leads to the following conclusion:
“Our information, which coincides moreover with that of many historians of this period, indicates that approximately 150 years after Christ begins the great emigration of the populations of the north of Afghanistan and the south of Tajikistan, emigration caused by the invasion of the "white" Huns, as they are called. After bloody battles, the Bulgarians, along with other peoples, left these regions and settled in the Caucasus. From that moment the history of our people is known. The Bulgarians stay in the Caucasus, build their cities there, etc. Historic Greater Bulgaria was formed during the time of Khan Koubrat, while his son, Asparouh, was the one who brought the Bulgarians to the territories it occupies today and it is he who is the founder of the First Bulgarian State . "
@@OrthodoxBulgaria
As the number of evidence of linguistic, ethnographic and socio-political nature show that Bulgars belonged to the group of Turkic peoples.[36][24][26][30]
The Bulgars (also Bolgars or proto-Bulgarians[40]) were a semi-nomadic people of Turkic descent, originally from Central Asia, who from the 2nd century onwards dwelled in the steppes north of the Caucasus and around the banks of river Volga (then Itil).
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Bulgaria
Bulgars (< Turkic bulgha- ‘to mix, stir up, disturb’, i.e. ‘rebels’)
A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian-Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiongnu (late 3rd cent. ... ...
www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-820
Kubrat (Gk. Kobratos, called Kurt in the Slavo-Turko-Bulgar Imennik or Name-List of Khans, 20, derived from Turkic quvrat ‘to bring together’)
Ruler of the *Onoghurs (Ononghundur) *Bulgars (c.605-42/65?). *John of *Nikiu (120, 47) reports that he became a Christian in ... ...
www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-2674
Utrigurs (Utighurs)
Oghur-Bulghar Turkic group, located south-east of the Don River, near the Sea of Azov, and traditional enemies of the related ... ...
www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-4918
Bolgar, Tatarstan/Russia (Bulgar, Bulgar al-Cadid, Kuybyshev)
By the 15th century it was known as Bulgar al-Cadid ‘New Bulgar’ after the Turkic-speaking Volga Bulgars.
www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780191905636.001.0001/acref-9780191905636-e-8397
Bulgars, Turkic,
also Proto-Bulgarians, Pra-Bulgarians, a pastoral people, originally living in Central Asia. Swept westward in the great movement of steppe peoples ...
www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780195046526.001.0001/acref-9780195046526-e-0850
Kuvrat
(Κοβρα̑τος, according to Moravcsik, Byzantinoturcica 2:161f), khan of the Onogur Bulgars; died after 642. Patr. Nikephoros I mentions his revolt against the Avars and alliance with Herakleios; Kuvrat was granted ...
www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100045529
Kubrat , of the royal Duloclan, ‘lord of the Ononghundur-Bulgars and Kotrags [Kutrigurs?]’
www.oxfordreference.com/search?q=Dulo+clan&searchBtn=Search&isQuickSearch=true
The Volga Tatars live in the central and eastern parts of European Russia and in western Siberia. They are the descendants of the Bulgar and Kipchak Turkic tribes who inhabited the western wing of the Mongol Empire, the area of the middle Volga River.
academic.oup.com/mbe/article/27/10/2220/963437
Chuvash is the sole living representative of the Bulgharic branch, one of the two principal branches of the Turkic family.
oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/mobile/view/10.1093/oso/9780198804628.001.0001/oso-9780198804628-chapter-28
Many Slavic tribes lived within the boundaries of the state, together with the proto-Bulgarians, a tribe of Turkic origin that had settled in the Balkan Peninsula at the end of the 7th century.
www.britannica.com/biography/Boris-I
The language of the European Huns is sometimes referred to as a Bulghar Turkic variety in general linguistic literature, but caution is needed in establishing its affiliations.
www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/4CBA0E2CB74C8093EC1CA38C95067D55/S2513843X20000183a_hi.pdf/_div_class__title__Early_nomads_of_the_Eastern_Steppe_and_their_tentative_connections_in_the_West__div_.pdf
In the Hunno-Bulgarian languages /r/ within a consonantic cluster
tends to disappear
projects.iq.harvard.edu/files/huri/files/vvi_n4_dec1982.pdf
An earlier date for the separation of proto-Turkic, preceding 209 BC would support the identification of Xiongnu language with proto-Bulgharic or one of its subgroups, while a later date of separation would make its association with proto-Turkic more plausible.
academic.oup.com/jole/article-pdf/5/1/39/32972809/lzz010.pdf
The Bulgars were a Turkic tribal confederation that gave rise to the Balkan Bulgar and Volga Bulgar states.The ethynonym derives from the Turkish bulgha-,”to stir,mix,disturb,confuse.”
books.google.com.tr/books?id=c788wWR_bLwC&pg=PA354&redir_esc=y&hl=tr#v=onepage&q=Bulgars&f=false (Harvard University Press)
Turkish tribes who founded a kingdom (9th-12th century) in the region between the Volga and the Kama.
www.larousse.fr/encyclopedie/divers/Bulgares_de_la_Volga_et_de_la_Kama/110545
The Bulgars,,Turkish people who were formed on the Don.
www.universalis.fr/recherche/l/1/napp/23625
Although the Bulgars were originally a Turkic-speaking people from Asia, they merged with the Slavic tribes whom they conquered in the 7th cent.
www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/arts/language/linguistics/bulgarian-language
The Volga Bulgars, a Turkish tribe then living on the east bank of the Volga River, ... the laws of Islam to the Bulgars, who had recently converted to the religion.
www.bookrags.com/research/ahmad-ibn-fadlan-ued/#gsc.tab=0
Eastern Bulgars , Bulgars Ancient Turkic people originating in the region n and e of the Black Sea.
www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/balkan-states
Volga Bulgaria was a northeastern European Turkic state that formed during the 9th century and continued into the first four decades of the 13th century.
www.readcube.com/articles/10.1002/9781118455074.wbeoe009
www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/social-science/cultures/other/bulgars-eastern
referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopedia-of-slavic-languages-and-linguistics-online/*-COM_031941
referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopaedia-of-islam-3/bulghars-COM_23726
www.thefreedictionary.com/Proto-Bulgar+languages
encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Bulgars
www.thefreedictionary.com/Bulgar
encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Bolgars
encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Bulgars
encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Proto-bulgarians
xn--80ad7bbk5c.xn--p1ai/en/content/brief-history-suvar-bulgars
bulgarizdat.ru/index.php/book1/article1-1
Bulgars, Eastern bŭl´gärz, -gərz [key], Turkic-speaking people, who possessed a powerful state (10th-14th cent.) at the confluence of the Volga and the Kama, E European Russia.
www.factmonster.com/encyclopedia/social-science/cultures/other/bulgars-eastern
(Cambridge University Press)
books.google.com.tr/books?id=Ylz4fe7757cC&pg=PA8&lpg=PA8&dq=proto+bulgars&source=bl&ots=vvGsuu2J3g&sig=ACfU3U2YuPKKdgVQKhoUi2fyDiC99n4N_Q&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiRqIaDlNvmAhWM-yoKHW38DDI4FBDoATAAegQIBRAB#v=onepage&q=proto%20bulgars&f=false
Population genetic analysis indicated that Conquerors had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars.
www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-53105-5
@Stoyan Stoyanov
Volga Tatars are Bulgars not even Tatars
lvl 1 crook: Bulgaria after 1946
lvl 100 mafia boss: Bulgaria in 846
Life is complicated...
Bulgarian History always intrigues me
Bulgarians have no history
@@papazataklaattiranimam shut up
@@papazataklaattiranimam Shut the hell up turk, atleast we have more history than you
Hey EmperorTigerstar, could you do a video about the Reconquista every year?
Nobody expected the spanish inquisition
I want to point out one misconseption, about how Cyrillic was made by greeks. This is false, Cyrill and Methodious were indeed Greek but they made the Glagolitsa alphabet, originally for Bohemia.
Cyrillic however was made by their Bulgarian students and was named after Cyrill.
Cyrill didnt invent the Cyrillic script.
No, only one of their Bulgarian students actually wrote the script, it was Clement Ohridski. I think the other students transcripted the script. And yes, that means that Cyril And Methodious transcripted it.
And yes, Clement Ohridski was born in Bulgaria, so He is a bulgarian.
@@Hristoo but the oldest proofs of cyrilic script are found in Preslav, where is confirmed cyrillic was used by the late ninth century yet, when is also confirmed that in ohrid, and generally the zones where Clement was active, the glagolitic alphabet was used at least until the XI century. And generally is confirmed the fact that the cyrillic was created and developed in the literary school of Preslav, also because knjaz Simeon Veliki made cyrillic official alphabet of Bulgaria in 893 and left it spread in the nation mainly from Preslav and the zones around the capital city. It is believed that Clement is an innovator and creator of a much simple and effective form of glagolitic, but nothing more than that.
@@Световид-е7и btw Simeon was a Tsar not a knyaz
@@younghefner8343 He is self-proclaimed tzar. He was recognized as tsar only by the Bulgarians.
@@astralisranger517 Byzantine Patriarch Nicholas the Mystic gave Simeon the title Tsar.
Never knew how interesting the history of our dear neighbors was. Greetings from Romania!
I like how one Bulgaria become Christian and the other Muslim.
Yep very interesting.Volga bulgar became muslim but balkan bulgars became christian.
@@Nabil-js5xu they are now both christian though.
@@tgs219 Last time I checked tatarstan was 53 percent muslim.
@@Nabil-js5xu Not about Tatarstan. I think there was another area nearby.
@@tgs219 The place which was called volga Bulgaria is now called tatarstan.
Great video! Greetings from Bulgaria
The entire history of Bulgaria in map form, I guess.
bruh
Justin Y. Why comment if you have nothing to say?
here 53 secs after you commented
*Finland has left the chat*
Do you just subscribe to every UA-cam channel possible and do nothing but comment?
90%:salty turkish kids spamming bulgarians are turks for some reasson
10%:nice video,great job,bulgaria was strong back then.
I'm from the 10 %
bulgarians are turkic origin people whoose extremelly asimilated by slavs
@@borakaraca9788
Nope Bulgarians are Scythian/Thracian/Slavic
Thank you so much!! Im from Bulgaria and was wondering when are you gonna make a video on it!!
>Description: Ukrainian Steppes
They are Turkic before slowly turning Slavic, mainly their freedom from the Ottoman Empire.
Ukrainian Steppes is a geographical term, not their ethnicity.
They have nothing to do with Turkic people. Every picture of them or description point out that they had no turkic characteristics
Bulgarians are Thracians wrote roman historians.
As an introduction, I want to present some ancient sources which speak about Bulgarian people:
- Herodotus writes that the Getae are Thracian people.
- Strabo writes that the Moesi and the Getae are from the same family and speak the same language.
- Cassius Dio writes that the Getae tribe are part of the Scythians.
- Procopius writes that the Getae and Sarmatians are from the same origin.
- Stephanus of Byzantium claims that the Scythians are Thracian people.
V-VI century
- Ioannes Malalas: "The so called Achilles went with Atreidai and led his own army of three thousand men, then called Myrmidons and now Bulgarians" - page 97 www.documentacatholicaomnia....raphia_(CSHB_Dindorfii_Recensione),_GR_LT.pdf picture from the text in Greek: facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10150315761464099&set=o.122376701166845&type=1&theater
- Michael Attaleiates: History - ''the Moesi ... are certainly Bulgarians who later received their new name ... Bulgarians Myrmidons ..."
- John Zonaras: ''Paeonians - Latins or Thracian people of Macedonia. These are so-called Paeonians. Paeonians were Bulgarians. "
- Johannes Tzetza: ''Pyros and Akamas (native) of the Thracian Hellespont, Maronietza Evfimos son of Treziius, Pirehmie, who was of the Paeonians they were all from the Bulgarians, from those of the river Axios, also called Vardar'' (see photo with Greek text).
XI century
- ''Bulgarians who are named Thracians according to the previous (old) monuments'' - „Hinc iter aggressi per fines Vulgariorum, quos vocitant Thracas, ut habent monumenta priorum“ - Fulcher of Chartres, a French priest, (a description of the first crusade in 1096)
III-IV century
- Mavro Orbin cites evidence of Marcus Aurelius Kasiodor that Bulgarians fought with the Romans about 390 AD.
- Cassiodorus writes that the Bulgarians are old Moesian or Illyrian people
- Ennodius Ticinensis (473-524, Bishop, court historian of the Gothic King Theodoric) indicate that Bulgarians are old Moesian and Illyrian people.
- 4th century map (see photo) by St. Jerome (331-420) - Mesia hec & Vulgaria (Misia here and Bulgaria). It is composed by even older maps - Bishop Eusebius of Caesarea (270 to 33, called the "father of church history." The map is preserved in a copy of the 12th century. letopisec.blog.bg/photos/123281/original/Karta_Ieronim_4_vek22222.jpg
I-II century
-Flavius Josephus writes ''Dacians called Bulgarians''
In addition:
- Ravennatis Anоnymi Cosmographia: „Inter vero Tratiam vel Macedoniam et Mysiam inferiorem modo Bulgari habitant, qui ex super scripta maiore Scythia egressi sunt.” upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5a/Karte_Ravennat.jpg
www.venstar.de/extra/App0003a.bmp
- Demetrios Chomateno: Brief Life of Clement Ohridski - ''This great Father was a native from the European Moesians, people usually known as Bulgarians. They were displaced in the old days by the military power of Alexander of placement of Brusa, Olympus to the North Atlantic and the Dead Sea, and after a long time with terrible army crossed the Danube and invaded all the neighboring areas: Pannonia and Dalmatia, Thrace and Illyricum, and and much of Macedonia and Thessaly''
Slavs do not exist in any historical source and were invented by Catherine the Great in the 18th century for geopolitical reasons. If you show me one source that says about the Slavs, I will give you $ 1000.
Bulgarians - Thracians wrote Roman historians.
Well, they were Indo-European before being Turks so... What's your point?
Nobody:
Bulgaria: I might move south. Or north. Or both.
Wow Bulgaria was once huge! Poor Bulgarians, look at them now
I'm pretty sure we're the country with the most lost land surrounding it.
@@Stoyan_72 many other countries lost a huge amount of land too for example the Qing dynasty the kingdom of mexico the Eastern Roman Empire (Byzantine Empire) the Ottoman Empire the Persian Empire and so on there are many other civilazations who lost much more land than the Bulgarian Empire did (the first or the second one) ps:I realy like the borders of bulgaria in 2:54
@@Δούρειος_96 Yeah I tried to talk people in restoring them but nobody got on board :/ Can't imagine why. I can;t get what my fellow country man was saying, but my late history teacher always repeated - We are the only caountry that borders it's own territories, but even that's not entirely true. You know which ERE's borders I like the most? 555AD
@@doomdrake123 thanks man 😃 fyrom is Bulgarian clay
@@Δούρειος_96 Yeah, I'm not actually bothered by the losing of the macedonian territory. But all the stealing of ancient greek history... that's something really messed up.
Volga Bulgaria (Tatar: Идел Болгар, Chuvash: Атӑлҫи Пӑлхар) or Volga-Kama Bulghar, was a historic Bulgar[2][3][4] state that existed between the 7th and 13th centuries around the confluence of the Volga and Kama River, in what is now European Russia. Volga Bulgaria was a multi-ethnic state with large numbers of Turkic Bulgars, a variety of Finnic and Ugric peoples, and many East Slavs.[5] The very strategic position of Volga Bulgaria allowed it to create a monopoly between the trade of Arabs, Norse and Avars.[6]
ua-cam.com/video/l34c7AtJ9bQ/v-deo.html&ab_channel=DWNews
Why does Turkey betray the Uighurs?
@@petertodorov9540 Turkey is one of the only countries to recognize uyghur genocide
@@nevize6660 What about the Armenian genocide?
@@nevize6660 still why aren't they doing anything?
The capital of First Bulgarian Empire was Pliska until around 890. The Preslav became the capital
Sorry, you forgot to mention the foundation of Bulgaria in Italy between 500-550 year? Cheers
The endangered Chuvash language is the only living representative of the Bulgar branch, the earliest offshoot of Proto-Turkic (PT), which is in many respects opposed to the Common Turkic (CT) languages. Evidence from Chuvash is of vital importance in reconstructing Proto-Turkic, particularly its phonology. Chuvash represents characteristic features of the Bulgar branch, such as two types of rhotacism (PT *ŕ > CT /z/, Bulg. /r/; PT *δ > Bulg. /r/ with /j/, /d/, /t/ and /z/ in different subgroups of CT), lambdacism (PT *λ > CT /š/, Bulg. /l/), the “Bulgar palatalization” (PT *s- > Bulg. /š-/ and PT *t- > Bulg. /č-/ in certain contexts) etc. (Dybo 2010; Róna-Tas & Berta 2011). These correspondences provide a more complete reconstruction of the Proto-Turkic phonological system.
ua-cam.com/video/l34c7AtJ9bQ/v-deo.html&ab_channel=DWNews
Why does Turkey betray the Uighurs?
Do you recognize the Armenian genocide?
Where do you find maps like that?
He makes them
@@duduchannel6729 he makes them with microsoft paint what a fucking legend
Die Fahradsstadt there’s no way
Interestingly enough, Bulgaria was the only axis power to gain territory from the settlement of WWII. As part of the cost of joining the axis, Romania agreed to lose parts of its own territory in exchange for territory in Moldova and Ukraine. This meant giving southern Dobruja to Bulgaria, as well as giving Transylvania to Hungary. As a result the USSR just let Bulgaria keep it.
You cannot gain something that is yours.
It wasn’t before the war though. They lost it in the Second Balkan War. It was added to Bulgaria during the war as a reward for joining the Axis.
Because Bulgaria has not declared war on the USSR, unlike Romania.
The treaty was approved by both USA and USSR , in 1940, when it happened that's why Bulgaria kept its territories.
Tatarstan: "I'm your father, Volga Bulgaria"
Bulgaria: "НЕТТТТ!!!!!!!!!"
Of course not! Volga Bulgaria is the mother of Kazan Tatarstan. U got it backwards! Tataria is the old name of Russia. Tatarstan is the father of Russia!!! Такие вот дела, товарищи;)))
Yeah you have it backwards Tatars came only with Mongols centuries after Bolgars.
@@taijituofdeath2210 you obviously know nothing about the Tatars. Read books.
@@corvon7410 Perhaps correct me. Tell me what did I say wrong. I'll confess it I only have wikipedia "knowledge" to work with on this topic.
@@taijituofdeath2210 Okay. From the beginning of the 20th century, it is believed that modern Tatars are descended from the Volga Bulgars, Kipchaks and Finno-Ugrians. Now historians argue when the Tatar nation was formed before or after the Mongol invasion.
Some argue that the Tatar nation was formed during the time of the Volga Bulgaria, others that the Tatar nation is a synthesis of the Volga Bulgars, Kipchaks and Finno-Ugrians, who, while in the Golden Horde, mixed together and got a common language.
In the 16-18 century, the Tatar nation was divided into two parts, the Tatars, who were part of Russia and the Crimean Tatars, who were in close cultural and political relations with the Ottoman Empire.
Now you know where you made a mistake?
P.S. Sorry my english
Bulgaria: *tries to take Constantinople like 10 times and fucking dies*
Bulgaria: *comes back to life just to try to take Constantinople a few more times and fucking dies*
Fucking legend
well we🇧🇬 saved constantinople/europe from the Arabs 717 so without us there wouldn’t be almost no christian countries in europe and let’s not forget how we saved it again from the mongols late 1223 (or 1224) but yeah we won the Battle of Constantinople 922 and our name for it was: ‘’Tsarigrad’’ basically means the city of the Tsar-King
Bulgarians and Serbs have a rich history in the Balkans...Unlike those fake slavic so called macedonians who are linguistically and ethnically Bulgarian But like to think they have links to ancient Greek antiquity...They wished....
also if they''re north macedonia then where tf is south macedonia!?
Did tigerstar miss 1 pixle in his original upload?
Горда Стара планина,
до ней Дунава синей,
слънце Тракия огрява,
над Пирина пламеней.
Родино...Мила Родино,
ти си земен рай,
твойта хубост, твойта прелест,
ах, те нямат край.
Паднаха борци безчет,
за народа наш любим,
майко, дай ни мъжка сила,
пътя им да продължим.
Родино...Мила Родино,
ти си земен рай,
твойта хубост, твойта прелест,
ах, те нямат край.
Къде е останалият текст?
А разве Фракия не Греция? а нима тракия не е гърция?
@@VolnovodDobra нет, ни политически, ни культурно.
@@cutg2722 останал текст? Освен припева това е всичко.
@@VolnovodDobra НЕ .НЕ Е ГЪРЦИЯ.СОРИ,СЕДНИ ДА СЕ ОБРАЗОВАШ...
I'm super proud of my history during the years. also i dont see any north mоnkеydоniаn state on the map? what a surprise
Another great video. Keep it up!
Thank you for this!
The first bulgarian empire was stronk af
it got supported by byzantines
@@SaintPanzerker nope . 913-927 Byzantines + Serbia went to destroy Bulgaria
also in 894-896 Byzantines+Hungary went to destroy Bulgaria
both times Bulgaria raised itself to the Top . No support from Byzantium
Nomadic invasions are a Bitch right.
@@tylerellis9097 yes . But you don't complain about the Slavic ones . Kubrat arranged the Bulgar migration into Balkans with Byzantine emperor Justinian and he agreed . But when he died ...the next Byzantine emperors ignored the proposal . The Khazars forced the Bulgars to migrate . Some tribes went to Italy, Hungary, FYROM and Volga (Bulgaria)
anyways brother ...it's History . Looking forward to having better relationships with Greece and rest of Balkan
Nikov is the first Bulgarian historian to pay special attention to, and attri bute great significance to, the Turkic components in the Bulgarian ethnogen esis (i.e., after the Bulgars) and among the ruling aristocracy. He elaborated on the issue of the "Turkic element's" influence upon Bulgarian history in a 1928 unpublished manuscript (delivered as a public lecture). Nikov began with the following policy-setting statement:
There is no period in our history on which the Turkic element did not exert its strongest influence and did not leave the deepest traces in the development of our people. [...] None of the Balkan peoples has experi enced the Turkic influence so strongly as our people,
The Turkic pressure began from Central Asia and had two directions to the northwest through southern Russia, and to the southwest through Persia and Asia Minor. The Bulgarian state was founded due to one of the Turkic peoples, the Bulgars, who themselves joined a number of Turkic tribal alliances (of Huns, Kutrigurs, Utigurs, Avars, and Khazars). During Byzantine rule, the Turkic Pechenegs and Uz came from the north; many of them crossed the Danube and were assimilated by the Bulgarian people. Then came the Cumans, without whose decisive help the uprising of Asenevtsi would hardly have succeeded. Thus, just as the First Bulgarian Kingdom was founded with the help of the Turkic Bulgars, the Second Kingdom was founded with "the decisive collabora tion of the Turkic Cumans."129 Not only did Cumans settle south of the Danube and become assimilated and absorbed by the Slavic-Bulgarian people, but they were also of great significance politically in the Second Kingdom, whose dynas ties all had Cuman blood in them. There were also many Bulgarian boyars of Cuman origin, including Balic in Dobrudzha. It could even be said that the Cumans acquired a dominant position in the political life of the state. 130 There followed the influence of the Mongol Tartars, who even supplied one Bulgarian king, Chaka. But of greatest importance were the Ottoman and Seljuk Turks, who conquered the Balkans from Asia Minor. Concerning the Cumans, Nikov considers the "transfusion of blood" from Turkic "elements" an asset, a means of rejuvenating and strengthening the "race" and enhancing the vitality of the Bulgarian people (in contrast with the conquering Turks).
Still no PRIMARY SOURCES to proove your Turkic theory?
Without PRIMARY SOURCES , Your Turkic theory is just pan Turk mythology🦄
🦄🦄🦄🦄🦄🦄🦄🦄🦄🦄🦄🦄🦄🦄🦄🦄🦄🦄🦄🦄🦄🦄
Hidja.I ,m read 📚 History.In 6 century maybe asimilacion Turik .Old Great Bulgarian empire for Ernak is 1/2 for Hunic Empire but Gotturik haganat Conquest .Bulgaria 😉 Bilgarian peole Scity indoiranic etic bro.
Rulers of Volga Bulgars were called Emir ?? I’m pretty sure it’s an Arabic title
Brother,
Volga Bulgarians converted to Islam in the 900's AD
The wanted a strong ally against their enemies the Khazars
@@petertodorov9540 Bulgarians in volga hahaha 🤣 do you mean Bulgars
@@papazataklaattiranimam
Dear Hanim,
Which word didn't you understand?
@@papazataklaattiranimam bulgars are the descendants of scythian have nothing to do with turk
@@himalayas1647
Amen Brother,
3:05 oh where did the volga bulgars went? Can somebody explain it?
Тhe mongols conquered it.
or did it? (Vsauce music)
check qazan khaganate
Mongol empire conquered it and killed around 80% of the entire population
Tatars are Bulgars
976 AD- The moment Byzantines get Basil II the Bulgar Slayer (Boulgaroktonos)on the throne - guess what he was famous for?
DMasterplanL, for may have or not have blinding 15k Bulgarians of course no first hand sources report this or suggest their was that many Bulgarians to blind.
@@tylerellis9097 yea 15,000 is exaggeration . Most likely 8,000
He is famous for being the BYzantine emperor who conquered the Bulgarian kingdom
but he did have a lot of allies (Croatia, Serbia, Hungary, Russians maybe)
Aleksandar Kan, Serbia, Croatia and Venice certainly but Serbia and Venice were Roman vassals and Croatia knew who won would dominate the Balkans. Hungary nah Hungary and Byzantium were always enemies and The Rus did give Basil men but didn’t intervene independently cause they didn’t feel like dying in Bulgaria again. All in all Bulgaria being annexed was a win for Both sides. The Bulgarian people got to keep their Patriarch, pay taxes in kind not coin, received protection against the Turkic raiders, were given high positions in government and the Military and were even allowed to settle where ever they wanted in Anatolia.
Byzantium got the Danube Border back, A Civilized Christian population that could counteract the growing Armenian faction in politics. Overland trade Routes to the Rus and A extensive Manpower boost in the Army that saved Byzantium when the Normans invaded. It’s crazy how quickly the Bulgarians integrated into the Byzantine Military and Society to the point John Komnenos was of direct descent from Samuel by his mother.
Then The Angeloi screwed it all up just like the rest of the Empire.
@@aleksk4151 I believe he did not ally much, I might be wrong but the kievan rus subjugated bulgaria crippling it so Byzantium could conquer it
The "Bulgars" were originally a Turkic people who migrated to present day Bulgaria (and gave it their name) from the Eurasian steppes. You can simply type Bulgar in Wikipedia and learn this basic fact.
Actually the Turks are Bulgaric
oficial historiography has accepted the communist theory which was the one of our best historians " Zlatarski"who was the first
to do a research on the Bulgars at the beggining of the 20th century. They didn't however possess our modern technology to do a more decent research. The iranic theory is only about 20 years old. And Litteraly all of our historians some of whom used to support the turkic theory has accepted it. The theory started to earn even more popularity in the recent years among historians, after a lot of new archaeological discoviries ,discovery of new sources and a better anthropological testing of the Bulgars and modern Bulgarians was done.
Alеxander The Great Is Bulgarian no
Doesn't 'bulgar' mean 'mixed' in old turkish?
Państwo Piesto Does it? I'm Turkish and don't even know.
-Let's get Bulgaria on 3 seas again-
Why cross it out when we should do it
From horse lord khans to one of the most powerful armies in the Middle Ages that terrorized the Romans
What about Kazan Khanate? Isn't it successor of Volga Bulgaria?
Nope Volga Bulgaria is way farther north
If you are talking about Old Great Bulgaria, then yes kinda. The Khazars invaded Old Great Bulgaria and so the Volga, Danube and Kuber's Bulgaria was created
@@Jj-or5ix No, the Kazan khanate was located on the site of Volga Bulgaria.
@@Jj-or5ix
No, Kazan Khanate is located on the site of the Volga Bulgaria.
@@Jj-or5ix Kazan khanate is not the same as Khazar khaganate.
@@Jj-or5ix kazan or qazan khaganate is a successor of Volga Bulgaria yes :)
Old Great Bulgaria or Great Bulgaria (Byzantine Greek: Παλαιά Μεγάλη Βουλγαρία, Palaiá Megálē Voulgaría), also often known by the Latin names Magna Bulgaria[3] and Patria Onoguria ("Onogur land"),[4] was a 7th century state formed by the Onogur Bulgars on the western Pontic-Caspian steppe (modern southern Ukraine and southwest Russia).[5] Great Bulgaria was originally centred between the Dniester and lower Volga.
The original capital was Phanagoria[6] on the Taman Peninsula between the Black and Azov seas. In the mid-7th century, Great Bulgaria expanded west to include Avar territory and was centered in Poltava. During the late 7th century, however, an Avar-Slavic alliance in the west, and Khazars in the east, defeated the Bulgars and the Great Bulgaria disintegrated. Successor states included Volga Bulgaria and the First Bulgarian Empire .
I like your girlfriend brother
Excuse me, but a small detail might be mentioned. The picture that you used right in the beginning, in the first 4 seconds, is a painting that depicts the battle of Grivita, in 1877, when romanian and russian forces attacked the Ottoman empire in the war that romanians call today, the ”Independence war”. I don't know how exactly this is related to the History of Bulgaria, except the fact that the city of Grivita and most of the battles where on Bulgarian territory. Except that, everybody in that painting is either a turk or a romanian. I will link the picture below(just delete one space before org):
ro.wikipedia. org/wiki/Asediul_Plevnei#/media/File:Grivita_1877.jpg
CORRECT! The picture displays the fight between the Romanians and Turks near the Bulgarian village of Grivitsa, during the Siege of Pleven (Plevna), in the Russo--Turkish War of 1877--1878. The said war brought freedom and de facto independence to some of the Bulgarian lands. Romania helped Russia to defeat the Turks in Bulgaria. Regards from an American descendant of Bulgarians from Aegean Macedonia and Pirot!
@@Ecoman365 Kind regards! It is very nice to see an american that is still interested in the history of his original lands.
Was thinking the same.
@@Ecoman365 Not independece! Autonomy in the Othoman Empire
The boss when you fight him: 2:02
The boss when you unlock him as a playable character: 4:06
Lmao
Do u know the moment when there r 2 bulgarias but none is in the region of modern day bulgaria?
Awesome vid mate
Real Bulgars or Bolgars were Turkic Group but today Bulgarians are Slavic because they assimilated by Slavic tribes.
False
Öksökö
Onogur Bulgars
Nikephoros I stated that Kubrat was lord of the Onogundurs, Theophanes referred to them as Onogundur Bulgars and Constantine VIIremarked that the Bulgars formerly called themselves Onogundurs. Variations of the name include Onoguri, Onoghuri, Onghur, Ongur, Onghuri, Onguri, Onogundur, Unogundur, and Unokundur.
Fatlinda Islami
You are not a Turk so why do you pretend to be a Turk ?
You are a 12 year old Albanian girl who lives with her mommy in Gostivar
Old Bulgarian Koşuk:
Etil suwı aka turur
Kaya tübi kaka turur
Balık telim baka turur
Kölün takı küşerür
Now Turkish Koşuk
İtil suyu akar durur
Kaya dibini oyar durur
Bütün balıklar baka durur
Gölü bile taşırırlar
We don't speak *genocide* here
Bulgar koşuk
@@papazataklaattiranimam
Why does Turkey betray the Uighurs?
ua-cam.com/video/dTiw8gEWGao/v-deo.html&ab_channel=WION
Я как раз живу на территории волжской булгарии
LOL😂😂😂
Greetings from Serbia
Ееее, русские
Glory to Ukraine!
Finally, someone who includes Volga Bulgaria in the history of Bulgaria.
More tatarstan history bro
Nice video, as always ;D
0:05 Make Bulgaria old and great again!
Excellent video! Greetings to all TRUTH--LOVERS from an American descendant of Bulgarians from Aegean Macedonia and Pirot!
@@stefanmirkovic6681 Nemoj tako, Brate! Dosta smo se svadjali! Zivelo SRPSKO--BUGARSKO pomiruvanje i prijatelstvo! Bog so nami!
@@Ecoman365 Prvi si počeo... Živela Velika Srbija i Golema Bugarska😉
@@stefanmirkovic6681 Zivelo bratstvo medzu svih PRAVOSLAVNIH SLOVENA! Nasi vragovi su MUSLIMANI!
@@Ecoman365 Tako je.. Nikad više brat na brata...❤☦
@@stefanmirkovic6681 NIKAD, Brate! S nami Gospod Bog!
I love Bulgaria very much! Greeting from your neighbour 🇧🇬♥️🇹🇷
love to neighbour Turks . Get rid of Islam bros , Jesus CHrist will save you
Finally a normally thinking person who isn't saying something against us... Love your country too...
Greeting from your northen neighbour 🇧🇬♥🇷🇴
@@aleksk4151 That's rather stupid thing to say, bro! Let them decide what's best for them, bro!
@@Zingam is it stupid to tell him the ONLY way to get his soul saved from Hellfire? JESUS is the only way
I know that we don't see JESUS but He is real and the Bible is the word of God
There is a mistake. The capital was moved from Pliska to Preslav in 893, not 693. But the video is still pretty good, keep it up!
Why is there no Kazan Khanate?
It was a tatar state , not Bulgarian
@@JohnnySins-tx9hi Bulgarians are tatars. Turkic peoples.
@@radziwill7193 Bulgarians established their first state in Europe in 632. The tatars firstly arrived in Europe around the 1240s. You do the maths lol
@@historyrhymes1701 So what?
@@historyrhymes1701 Please, read about Tatars before you write something about them
Volga Bulgars living today as Chuvash. Cuvashs are speaking Turkic. Origially Bulgars had Turkic origin and they turned to Slav. Even "Bulgar" word is Turkish. And look their first kings' name. Also they Turkish.
Volga Tatars are also considered descendants of Volga Bulgars.
Turkic not turkish
Volkan Çoban Cuvashs aren’t Volga Bulgarians. Volga Bulgaria is Russia. And Old Bulgarian is Old Church Slavonic. Every Slav speaks Bulgarian dialect.
Doctor T'Soni but only Chuvash is in similar language group with ancient Bulgarian. У чувашей и татар язык похож только чуть-чуть, хоть оба и в тюркской семье
@@str0fix Чувашский входит в булгарские языки, а татарский в кыпчакские языки.
Nice video by the way do you guys know what music is this?
should be in the desc, it's clash defiant by kevin macleod
@@DeFrostkill thanks
The video is ameazing,but you lost the Alcek bulgarians and the Kuber bulgars.
Bulgars not bulgarians
@@olumluhayatbugunvarsinyari1326
Fatlinda Islami
Bulgarians not Albanians like you
I Love Bulgaria
I from Poland
BULGARIAN COUTRYBALL UA-camRS INCOMING
"Emir: Kotrag" - what the f*ck, Kotrag was Khan, not Emir.
Bulgar Turks were khans and emirs
@@olumluhayatbugunvarsinyari1326
Zonja Fatlinda Islami
You are not a Turk so why do you pretend to be a Turk?
You are a 12 year old Albanian girl who lives with her parents in Gostivar
@@petertodorov9540
ua-cam.com/video/2doYxUe3ilg/v-deo.html&ab_channel=Dookumoftherookbrook
*Notices your Bulgaria*
OwO wanna woose two wowld waws
@@yew2489 Hey hey, we are world champions in turning the tides of world wars... against our favor... two times :D :D
@@doomdrake123 We, Romanias only once.
Turkey: Level 1 Crook
Romania: Level 25 Hitman
Bulgaria: Level 99 Boss
@@Kunnis Lol yeah, the second time we were not even trying. You at least fought against the commies. I would like a favor could you provide me with something on medieval romanian history to read cuz we hear do not even touch the subject.
@@doomdrake123 ua-cam.com/video/vwNUzWne1a8/v-deo.html
This is a brife history of Romania, there is more than medieval time, but I think you would like it
4:34 some Aegan Islands should be Bulgarian land
As far as i know only the island of Thasos. Correct me if I am wrong
And Samothraki Island been Bulgarian Land in WW2. Other Islands must be Turkey land but fcking Greece invade them !
@@iyigitr35 calm , calm it's already 7 decades ago
@@iyigitr35 trueee
but hey we should be happy we have our countries :) that's the important thing
Actually here in the video when the secon bulgarian empire ''colapsed'' it didnt collapse, because they still held on to one castle up until the ottomans conquered them in like 1446 or something.
Hisarria*
You must correct the video there has been a brother from Old Bulgaria who left and founded another Bulgaria in present-day Macedonia, Albania and another brother from Old Bulgaria founded another country in Italy for all the Apennines.
Greetings from Turkey. Respect !
thanks . Respect
The Turkic languages are clearly interrelated, showing close similarities in phonology, morphology, and syntax. Historically, they split into two types early on, Common Turkic and Bolgar Turkic. The language of the Proto-Bolgars, reportedly similar to the Khazar language, belonged to the latter type. Its only modern representative is Chuvash, which originated in Volga Bolgarian and exhibits archaic features.
The Proto-Bulgarians had a somewhat eventful history prior to their arrival on the Balkan Peninsula. The earliest written sources indicate that they inhabited the region to the north of the Caucasus in the 4th century A.D. and had close contact with the Georgians and Armenians. They belonged to the Turkic ethno-linguistic group and their language resembled that of the Huns, Khazars, Avars and other tribes.
(How the bulgarian state was founded-Dimiter Angelov)
The Oghur, or Onogur or Ogur[3] languages (also known as Bulgar, Pre-Proto-Bulgar,[4]or Lir-Turkic and r-Turkic), are a branch of the Turkic language family. The only extant member of the group is the Chuvash language. The first to branch off from the Turkic family, the Oghur languages show significant divergence from other Turkic languages, which all share a later common ancestor. Languages from this family were spoken in some nomadic tribal confederations, such as those of the Onogurs or Ogurs, Bulgars, and Khazars.[5]Some scholars consider Hunnic a similar language[6] and refer to this extended grouping as Hunno-Proto-Bulgarian.[7]
The only surviving language from this linguistic group is believed to be Chuvash.Omeljan Pritsak in his study "The Hunnic Language of the Attila Clan" (1982)[10] concluded that the language of the Bulgars was from the family of the Hunnic languages, as he calls the Oghur languages.[11]
According to Antoaneta Granberg : " the data is insufficient to clearly distinguish Huns, Avars and Bulgars one from another" - introduction, the second paragraph
Bolgars are still Turk in Volga region.Mahmud al kashgari wrote bulgar language in his diwan lughat al turk before 1000 years.
Even ilovelanguages made video about bulgar language(volga bulgar poet from Diwan Lughat al Turk)
Bulgar Turks found Bulgaria
SO Turks found Bulgaria before Turkey LOL
@@olumluhayatbugunvarsinyari1326
Fatlinda Islami you are not a Turk so why do you pretend to be a Turk?
You are 12 year old Albanian girl who lives with her parents in Gostivar
So Bulgaria used to be Russia and Ukraine Nice
No
they were turkic tribes than they had a huge revolt which made them slavs
@Light Master hmm i don t know correctly all i know is their origin:p
@Light Master But still, Byzantium outlived them.
Bulgaria is oldest country in Europe. Bulgaria is first national state in Europe which adopt Christianity and Bulgarian church became first national independent church in Europe in year 927.
Bulgarians created Bulgarian Civilization with Bulgarian language, Bulgarian alphabet Cyrillic and Orthodox Christianity.
Bulgarians spread Christianity and the Bible, translated into Bulgarian language and written in Cyrillic, among the so-called "Slavs" and incorporated most of the "Slavs" into Bulgarian civilization, including the Russians.
All so-called "Slavic" languages are created on the basis of Bulgarian language. Russian language and so-called "Slavic" languages on the Balkans are dialects of Bulgarian language.
Today about 300 million people in Eurasia including Russia use Bulgarian writing system Cyrillic as the official alphabet.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Bulgarian_Empire
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simeon_I_of_Bulgaria
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyrillic_script
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Bulgarian_Empire
OMG LOVE YOUR MAPPING VIDEOS TIGERSTAR
Bulgarians be like : Hmm.... Bulgaria video came out just after the Thrace video... *C0!NcidEnCe ??????*
Historical the strongest balkan nation for almost 800 year
@ls7orBust how can I forgot a friend :D
Διονύσιος 1. You are being racist for no reason
2. Greece was the not the strongest it was the Ottomans and Bulgars. The one which was strong was the Byzantium empire not Greece
@@DionysiosPhryx they were stronger than greeks and defeated them in most of the wars, also they helped the Romans during the Arab invasion of Constantinople
Elias Frahat
What arab invasion of Constantinople? I thought the won who invaded was the Ottoman Caliphate
@@DelabLeFou ummayed caliphate tryed to invade Rome but failed
Why are there more Turks than Bulgarians here.
to make a long story short
some turks believe that bulgaria is or at least was originally turkic. these turks are most of the time also part of the pan-turkic-irredentism and therefore have an interest in videos concerning bulgaria, primarily its history.
dario yes they doing it everytime but right here bulgarians might be turkic really..
@@kavallerie1436 at the premise that everybody here is speaking about the Bulgaria in the balkans
You could only say that about the nobility of the very first Bulgaria (the pagan Bulgaria wich was not an empire) and even that is disputed. Someone else in the comments mentioned that the first bulgar tribes could be actually of indo-iranian origin.
Ehter way the thing what annoys me is, that, because of the circumstance that the nobility of the first bulgars where maybe of turkic origin, many of these irriedentist turks belive that therefor Bulgarians are turks, which is complete nonsense
Volga Bulgars living today as Chuvash. Cuvashs are speaking Turkic. Origially Bulgars had Turkic origin and they turned to Slav. Even "Bulgar" word is Turkish. And look their first kings' name. Also they Turkish.
@Slime Mapper Yes but that's because the Ottomans moved populations around.
0:55 the khan Telets not Terets :)
hello greetings from Greece ^.^
@Pablo Emilio Gaviria Escobar 1945
Great European country.
Krum and Omurtag were the best Khans of Bulgaria.
Krum is probably the best. Omurtag is pretty neat but Tervel and Asparukh are better.
Johnny Sins, Krum is best before him the Byzantines we’re slowly but surely pushing the bolghars out of the Balkains. After 4 khans being deposed for getting their asses kicked by Constantine vi he was a welcome sight.
Bulgarian Ostrogoth, he helped save the day, the Byzantines were already winning the siege when the Bulgars arrive as they had already destroyed the Muslim fleet and food supply.
Bulgarian Ostrogoth, I never never heard anyone call him the savior of Europe, what west called him that? Most people who knew this siege didn’t even know the Bolghars were involved, infact western historians of the time don’t even mention the Bolghars in the siege. Nothing against him but I can’t find any historical evidence for your claim outside Bulgaria.
Bulgarian Ostrogoth, except nobody does even today, people always talk about Byzantium being the shield of Christianity not the Bolghars. My guy I honestly think your talking out of your ass here. Show me proof of your statement outside of Bulgaria. I can find no evidence of what you say.
+ 1 im from bulgaria and i see your videos from 2 years. You have my respect
As the number of evidence of linguistic, ethnographic and socio-political nature show that Bulgars belonged to the group of Turkic peoples.[36][24][26][30]
The Bulgars (also Bolgars or proto-Bulgarians[40]) were a semi-nomadic people of Turkic descent, originally from Central Asia, who from the 2nd century onwards dwelled in the steppes north of the Caucasus and around the banks of river Volga (then Itil).
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Bulgaria
Bulgars (< Turkic bulgha- ‘to mix, stir up, disturb’, i.e. ‘rebels’)
A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian-Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiongnu (late 3rd cent. ... ...
www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-820
Many Slavic tribes lived within the boundaries of the state, together with the proto-Bulgarians, a tribe of Turkic origin that had settled in the Balkan Peninsula at the end of the 7th century.
www.britannica.com/biography/Boris-I
The Bulgars were a Turkic tribal confederation that gave rise to the Balkan Bulgar and Volga Bulgar states.The ethynonym derives from the Turkish bulgha-,”to stir,mix,disturb,confuse.”
books.google.com.tr/books?id=c788wWR_bLwC&pg=PA354&redir_esc=y&hl=tr#v=onepage&q=Bulgars&f=false (Harvard University Press)
The Volga Bulgars, a Turkish tribe then living on the east bank of the Volga River, ... the laws of Islam to the Bulgars, who had recently converted to the religion.
www.bookrags.com/research/ahmad-ibn-fadlan-ued/#gsc.tab=0
Eastern Bulgars , Bulgars Ancient Turkic people originating in the region n and e of the Black Sea.
www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/balkan-states
Volga Bulgaria was a northeastern European Turkic state that formed during the 9th century and continued into the first four decades of the 13th century.
www.readcube.com/articles/10.1002/9781118455074.wbeoe009
www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/social-science/cultures/other/bulgars-eastern
referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopedia-of-slavic-languages-and-linguistics-online/*-COM_031941
www.thefreedictionary.com/Proto-Bulgar+languages
xn--80ad7bbk5c.xn--p1ai/en/content/brief-history-suvar-bulgars
bulgarizdat.ru/index.php/book1/article1-1
Bulgars, Eastern bŭl´gärz, -gərz [key], Turkic-speaking people, who possessed a powerful state (10th-14th cent.) at the confluence of the Volga and the Kama, E European Russia.
The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6th ed. Copyright © 2012, Columbia University Press.
Cambridge University Press
books.google.com.tr/books?id=Ylz4fe7757cC&pg=PA8&lpg=PA8&dq=proto+bulgars&source=bl&ots=vvGsuu2J3g&sig=ACfU3U2YuPKKdgVQKhoUi2fyDiC99n4N_Q&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiRqIaDlNvmAhWM-yoKHW38DDI4FBDoATAAegQIBRAB#v=onepage&q=proto%20bulgars&f=false
You're right Bulgaria is weak WITH ERDOGAN ATATURK WE TURKS CAN MAKE BULGARIA TURKISH AGAIN
BULGARIA= GREAT INDOEUROPEAN HISTORY
Indo European is just a language family created after 1800. The Bulgars were not Bulgarian(south slavic) speaking, they were Bulgar Oghuric(western turkic) speaking. Same as the Huns, Avars, Sabirs, Khazars etc.
@@nietzsche193
Only according to PanTurk Mythology
Bulgarians were never Turkic
1.Give Primary Sources that show Tengrinism in Bulgaria
2.Give Primary Sources that show the name Bulgarian comes from Bulgamak
@@petertodorov1792 already Bulgarians were never Turks. They're newbie nation, with old root. Who taken their name from their rulers, from the Bulgars. Citizen of Bulgars was Bulgarians. Turks are eroded, only the Slavs remained. With the name of Bulgarian.
Nikov is the first Bulgarian historian to pay special attention to, and attri bute great significance to, the Turkic components in the Bulgarian ethnogen esis (i.e., after the Bulgars) and among the ruling aristocracy. He elaborated on the issue of the "Turkic element's" influence upon Bulgarian history in a 1928 unpublished manuscript (delivered as a public lecture). Nikov began with the following policy-setting statement:
There is no period in our history on which the Turkic element did not exert its strongest influence and did not leave the deepest traces in the development of our people. [...] None of the Balkan peoples has experi enced the Turkic influence so strongly as our people,
The Turkic pressure began from Central Asia and had two directions to the northwest through southern Russia, and to the southwest through Persia and Asia Minor. The Bulgarian state was founded due to one of the Turkic peoples, the Bulgars, who themselves joined a number of Turkic tribal alliances (of Huns, Kutrigurs, Utigurs, Avars, and Khazars). During Byzantine rule, the Turkic Pechenegs and Uz came from the north; many of them crossed the Danube and were assimilated by the Bulgarian people. Then came the Cumans, without whose decisive help the uprising of Asenevtsi would hardly have succeeded. Thus, just as the First Bulgarian Kingdom was founded with the help of the Turkic Bulgars, the Second Kingdom was founded with "the decisive collabora tion of the Turkic Cumans."129 Not only did Cumans settle south of the Danube and become assimilated and absorbed by the Slavic-Bulgarian people, but they were also of great significance politically in the Second Kingdom, whose dynas ties all had Cuman blood in them. There were also many Bulgarian boyars of Cuman origin, including Balic in Dobrudzha. It could even be said that the Cumans acquired a dominant position in the political life of the state. 130 There followed the influence of the Mongol Tartars, who even supplied one Bulgarian king, Chaka. But of greatest importance were the Ottoman and Seljuk Turks, who conquered the Balkans from Asia Minor. Concerning the Cumans, Nikov considers the "transfusion of blood" from Turkic "elements" an asset, a means of rejuvenating and strengthening the "race" and enhancing the vitality of the Bulgarian people (in contrast with the conquering Turks).
@@muhan6831 muhh bulgurians and bulgars are same😂😂😂😂