As Monarchists outnumber republicans heavily, it was fair. The truth is republicans have to fabricate things they would call facts to try to make a case. Most of their 'argument' is envy-based. Resentful that the Royals live in palaces or grand houses. They need to grow up.
Her elite Oxford entitled education I have to call out here..she knows nothing of real life struggles to create such a moral high ground on anything about struggles of the average Joe's in the UK,she's rude and disrespectful and should have got told to shut up years ago by her parents..what nonsense
Where was this Riz “educated”? By whom? Analyse that - investigate that - discover who is teaching young people like Riz to spout these misstatements and simply false statements. These young people think they are speaking accurately - why?
An elite entitled privileged education from Oxford shines through this very dislikeable brat who has no concept of struggling in Britain like those less fortunate
People spouting about a republic have no idea just how much the monarchy is integral to how Britain functions. Not sure why people want to throw everything out of the pram - move to where there is a republic and see how you like it
I like living in a republic just fine thank you very much. It's not perfect, but neither is your system. Besides I like pledging my allegance to a constitution, not another human being.
@@laurenceBDontYaNo absolutely provide a stable influence and they represent the country - not left or right. It's not about popularity and false promises for votes. The Queen was very much about service to her people. I think Charles is very similar and William is also like minded. If you end up with someone who does things to the detriment of the country then have the discussion - not necessary at the moment and there are many other issues that should take priority
@@georgewarner5496 You know eh that there are people who sleep rough in every country eh? Including the US which is not part of the commonwealth? It's not really about money and really the estates, jewels etc etc are not personal property - what they own outright is not as much & probably less then the likes of Bezos & Gates - prob less than even the Rothschilds
@@laurenceBDontYaNo Elected would be stable?? Boris? Truss? Rishi? Anyone elected would be promoting their own specific interests and that would be constantly changing On a broader note - I suggest you research the actual purpose of the commonwealth and what it means to be a part of that. Countries continue to join which speaks to how well it works
@@laurenceBDontYaNo The stability that they provide is not politically based - it's in spite of whoever is in power - rather self-evident if you look If the goal is ceremonial with limitations what on earth difference does it make to change what is already in place? This desire comes from people who think anything more than 50 yrs old is without merit, old, dusty and of no value
We knew this Day would come when Her Late Majesty died. But, I have a feeling the last few years & the Scandals surrounding the British Monarchy (80s/90s & the Meghan & Harry Drama) has caused the stir for this debate. As an American who Loves everything about the Monarchy Represents we need to give it time Especially under KCIII. This Discussion should be happening when Prince George is King. I would not want to see the UK as a republic in my lifetime.
Since the US is not part of the commonwealth your opinion doesn’t matter. As a Canadian we have been part of the commonwealth since our inception but we didn’t have to fight a war to get our own charter of rights. We will continue to have King Charles as head of state because it does provide stability as another voice at the table. It takes nothing from us as we govern ourselves but only adds to our country and our alliance.
"Fear God. Honour the king." United Kingdom, "...Fear God. Honour the King" with THANKSGIVING, for "THIS is the will of God in Christ (the Messiah) Y'shua-Jesus, for you," Great Britain (1 Tim 2:1-6; Eph 5:20; 1 Thess 5:18; 1 Peter 2:17; Heb 13:15). Britain is STILL GREAT in God's eyes because of HIS CHOICE of an endowment upon you of an EMINENT THRONE to fulfil His plan to make you an aspirational kingdom-nation with unlimited potential within HIS commonwealth, which will emerge in due course when the second Kingdom of David reigns globally when David's Jerusalem Throne is restored by the LORD Jesus after His return to accomplish and enforce victory for Israel at Armageddon, all due to the Gospel of salvation which has graced your history (Gen 35:11; Is 9:6,7; Jer 31:7,10,17,31-36; Zech 2:10-12; 14:4-19; Mk 11:10; Lk 1:32,33; Eph 2:11,12; Rev 19:11-21). Don't give up your faith or your royal throne under ANY circumstances, or you'll bitterly regret the consequences of your "great grace" deserting you, for breach of the "everlasting covenant" (Heb 13:20,21) Remain loyal to the Crown and the tradition of its unique Parliamentary relationship, and blessing will not desert your island home. Enjoy the solemnity and spectacle of a priceless national inheritance. The world watches your response. Republicanism is not the model ordained for you. Just believe, and if you return to Him, you'll see the glory of God in His favour upon you. 1 Timothy 2:2-6 2 I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks, be made for all men; 2 For KINGS, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a QUIET and PEACEABLE life in all GODLINESS and HONESTY. 3 For this is GOOD and ACCEPTABLE in the sight of GOD our SAVIOUR; 4 Who will have all men (repent) to be saved (from Judgment of sin), and to come to the knowledge of the Truth (Acts 17:26-31) 5 For there is one God, and one Mediator between God and men, the man from heaven, Christ (the Messiah) Jesus (the Word of God Incarnate as "God with us," Immanu El - Isaiah 7:13,14) 6 Who gave Himself (on the Cross) as a Ransom for all, attested to at just the right time.
If they wanted a decent debate, they should have picked a better representative for the Republican side. A more neutral host would also help assure a more fair debate. Not a royalist simp as the moderator.
I would like miss Charles and camilla and go for William and Kate Camilla was nothing but a bit on the side and now people are expected to curtesy to her no way
Your language says a great deal about you - not in a good way. Camilla was the woman Charles REALLY wanted to marry & compatible with him as Diana never was or could be. You sound embittered - let down in relationships perhaps.
The Sovereign acts as a focus for national identity, unity and pride; yes UNITY AND PRIDE every successful country should have unity for without it that country is doomed, also give a sense of stability and continuity; officially recognise success and excellence, and support the ideal of voluntary service. In all these roles ( Look how the country comes together in these times how they did in and with the platinum jubilee the pride the comradery the History envied by countries throughout the world, tell me a country in the world with a dictator or president that has national pride stability freedom and unity as the U.K. and commonwealth. It has worked for 1,400 + years and works for me. many more benefits also and too many to mention Which is why a constitutional monarchy will always trump a republic. It allows the nation to express its soul. direct royalty-related tourism brings in approx £550 million. Last year the monarchy contributed around £1.8 billion to the UK economy. The taxpayer pays around two pounds per year each for our great and wonderful monarchy and proud ancient traditions How much money does the monarchy bring to the UK? Some £1.8 bn a year…and our ancient and proud traditions intact. Brand Finance, which bills itself as the world’s leading brand valuation consultancy, estimated that the royals contributed 1.8 billion pounds ($2.2 bn) to the UK economy in 2020 through a combination of the Crown Estate’s revenues and indirect benefits for tourism, trade, media and the arts real estate and heritage sites, foreign investment and much more
This leftie is looking down at her homework all the time she needs to know How much money does the monarchy bring to the UK? Some £1.8 bn a year…and our ancient and proud traditions intact. Brand Finance, which bills itself as the world’s leading brand valuation consultancy, estimated that the royals contributed 1.8 billion pounds ($2.2 bn) to the UK economy in 2020 through a combination of the Crown Estate’s revenues and indirect benefits for tourism, trade, media and the arts real estate and heritage sites, foreign investment and much more
Who would you choose out of King Charles III or a President Tony Blair?
Neither, both are globalist maniacs.
Definitely King Charles🙂🙂🙂
Neither, but a different President would do. End the monarchy now....
Deciding between the rock and a hard place
The question people should ask is: "Why accept either"?
Both unelected.
Both members of the WEF
Two intelligent educated women and one petulant child who is confused about who she is! Hardly a fair fight!
You would have to be an idiot to expect a fair debate on the subject on this channel.
As Monarchists outnumber republicans heavily, it was fair. The truth is republicans have to fabricate things they would call facts to try to make a case. Most of their 'argument' is envy-based. Resentful that the Royals live in palaces or grand houses. They need to grow up.
That young lady wasn't genuinely listening to the lady with the headband, she was just waiting to run her mouth on her next talking point.
She's so rude, she doesn't listen when other people are talking she just looks at her notes as she does in other interviews.
That poor girl made a fool of herself and what she represents.
She was a particularly weak advocate for her position.
I don't feel the least bit sorry for her; she's envious, ignorant & full of herself & needs taking down a peg or three!
Her elite Oxford entitled education I have to call out here..she knows nothing of real life struggles to create such a moral high ground on anything about struggles of the average Joe's in the UK,she's rude and disrespectful and should have got told to shut up years ago by her parents..what nonsense
If Riz gave me a pound and I then gave her a tenner she would consider that bad value for money.
the two middle aged monarchists look ridiculous here, as does their kissing up to the imperalists....
The working royals do so much for charity.
Just wish Princess Anne Was The First Born, What A Queen She Would Have Been.
I agree but she wouldn't be Queen even if she was the first born.
What a stupid thing to say. Just Google things before you stat posting. Even if she had been born first she wouldn't have been Queen. Dope.
Where was this Riz “educated”? By whom? Analyse that - investigate that - discover who is teaching young people like Riz to spout these misstatements and simply false statements. These young people think they are speaking accurately - why?
An elite entitled privileged education from Oxford shines through this very dislikeable brat who has no concept of struggling in Britain like those less fortunate
Oxford university
Left wing agenda at university.
8:51 "I have really no interest in Charles as a person; as far as I'm concerned, he's just some guy."🙂😁🙃😉
Riz the insufferable back again
They should stop this slavery and colonialsation thing. Every country was involved in that. From Ghana West Africa.
Doesn’t this girl go to Oxford University… why would I listen to her about privilege or inequality of the Royals?
Exactly...she's up there with them by being privileged,can she not use her elite education to do something useful
People spouting about a republic have no idea just how much the monarchy is integral to how Britain functions. Not sure why people want to throw everything out of the pram - move to where there is a republic and see how you like it
I like living in a republic just fine thank you very much. It's not perfect, but neither is your system. Besides I like pledging my allegance to a constitution, not another human being.
@@laurenceBDontYaNo absolutely provide a stable influence and they represent the country - not left or right. It's not about popularity and false promises for votes. The Queen was very much about service to her people. I think Charles is very similar and William is also like minded.
If you end up with someone who does things to the detriment of the country then have the discussion - not necessary at the moment and there are many other issues that should take priority
@@georgewarner5496 You know eh that there are people who sleep rough in every country eh? Including the US which is not part of the commonwealth?
It's not really about money and really the estates, jewels etc etc are not personal property - what they own outright is not as much & probably less then the likes of Bezos & Gates - prob less than even the Rothschilds
@@laurenceBDontYaNo Elected would be stable?? Boris? Truss? Rishi?
Anyone elected would be promoting their own specific interests and that would be constantly changing
On a broader note - I suggest you research the actual purpose of the commonwealth and what it means to be a part of that. Countries continue to join which speaks to how well it works
@@laurenceBDontYaNo The stability that they provide is not politically based - it's in spite of whoever is in power - rather self-evident if you look
If the goal is ceremonial with limitations what on earth difference does it make to change what is already in place?
This desire comes from people who think anything more than 50 yrs old is without merit, old, dusty and of no value
I’m an american. You don’t want our system of government the way it is today.
of course she/they/zem has short hair😂😂😂
🇨🇦 long live the king
🇦🇺 Areed!
Long live King Charles III from a Canadian living in the US.
That young lady is talking rubbish people come to see our royals. If she is so disappointed in our royals go join Megan in the states.
She is welcome here, but not you.
@@laurenceBDontYaNo the point is that Versailles would be getting a lot more visitors if France was still a monarchy.
More people visit the Palace of Versailles, which makes Buckingham Palace look like a garden shed.
@@unusedsub3003 actually if you did your homework you’d realise Buckingham Palace is larger than Versailles.
@@PeterG1975 Yeh, but Buckingham Palace is pretty tatty in comparison
We knew this Day would come when Her Late Majesty died.
But, I have a feeling the last few years & the Scandals surrounding the British Monarchy (80s/90s & the Meghan & Harry Drama) has caused the stir for this debate.
As an American who Loves everything about the Monarchy Represents we need to give it time Especially under KCIII. This Discussion should be happening when Prince George is King. I would not want to see the UK as a republic in my lifetime.
Since the US is not part of the commonwealth your opinion doesn’t matter. As a Canadian we have been part of the commonwealth since our inception but we didn’t have to fight a war to get our own charter of rights. We will continue to have King Charles as head of state because it does provide stability as another voice at the table. It takes nothing from us as we govern ourselves but only adds to our country and our alliance.
Royals are Britain's culture 100s of years old
Thousands
Haha thousands then🙂
That doesn't look good for parliament and the candidates there!🤨
God… that woman … doesn’t studied her lesson
a war criminal or an adulterous couple is that the best choice we have to lord over us. oh wait we don't get to choose
This kid talking rubbish!
A president? Knowing the Brits, if you give us a vote we would end up with President Presi McPresface, Ricky Gervais, Clarkson or Beckham.
I'd rather a Monarch than a Mullah lol 😊😊
Well said Sarah 👏
No it didn't!
It did!
Charles = WEF stooge. What's the point?
she just called it the modern family. and royal britain. lol.
What about your prime minister madam
"Fear God. Honour the king."
United Kingdom, "...Fear God. Honour the King" with THANKSGIVING, for "THIS is the will of God in Christ (the Messiah) Y'shua-Jesus, for you," Great Britain (1 Tim 2:1-6; Eph 5:20; 1 Thess 5:18; 1 Peter 2:17; Heb 13:15).
Britain is STILL GREAT in God's eyes because of HIS CHOICE of an endowment upon you of an EMINENT THRONE to fulfil His plan to make you an aspirational kingdom-nation with unlimited potential within HIS commonwealth, which will emerge in due course when the second Kingdom of David reigns globally when David's Jerusalem Throne is restored by the LORD Jesus after His return to accomplish and enforce victory for Israel at Armageddon, all due to the Gospel of salvation which has graced your history (Gen 35:11; Is 9:6,7; Jer 31:7,10,17,31-36; Zech 2:10-12; 14:4-19; Mk 11:10; Lk 1:32,33; Eph 2:11,12; Rev 19:11-21).
Don't give up your faith or your royal throne under ANY circumstances, or you'll bitterly regret the consequences of your "great grace" deserting you, for breach of the "everlasting covenant" (Heb 13:20,21)
Remain loyal to the Crown and the tradition of its unique Parliamentary relationship, and blessing will not desert your island home.
Enjoy the solemnity and spectacle of a priceless national inheritance.
The world watches your response.
Republicanism is not the model ordained for you.
Just believe, and if you return to Him, you'll see the glory of God in His favour upon you.
1 Timothy 2:2-6
2 I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks, be made for all men;
2 For KINGS, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a QUIET and PEACEABLE life in all GODLINESS and HONESTY.
3 For this is GOOD and ACCEPTABLE in the sight of GOD our SAVIOUR;
4 Who will have all men (repent) to be saved (from Judgment of sin), and to come to the knowledge of the Truth (Acts 17:26-31)
5 For there is one God, and one Mediator between God and men, the man from heaven, Christ (the Messiah) Jesus (the Word of God Incarnate as "God with us," Immanu El - Isaiah 7:13,14)
6 Who gave Himself (on the Cross) as a Ransom for all, attested to at just the right time.
Does it make any difference if the outcome is identical ?
That republican girl couldn’t lead ducks to water.
Blair will be to busy with his wef dutys
Riz - you looked better with the blonde bob.
Why don’t they move to one then. No one’s stopping them.
I’m sure those people pouring into the UK VIA France would instantly trade places with them.
If they wanted a decent debate, they should have picked a better representative for the Republican side. A more neutral host would also help assure a more fair debate. Not a royalist simp as the moderator.
I would like miss Charles and camilla and go for William and Kate Camilla was nothing but a bit on the side and now people are expected to curtesy to her no way
Your language says a great deal about you - not in a good way. Camilla was the woman Charles REALLY wanted to marry & compatible with him as Diana never was or could be. You sound embittered - let down in relationships perhaps.
I used to rate Vanessa. What happened??
The Sovereign acts as a focus for national identity, unity and pride; yes UNITY AND PRIDE every successful country should have unity for without it that country is doomed, also give a sense of stability and continuity; officially recognise success and excellence, and support the ideal of voluntary service. In all these roles ( Look how the country comes together in these times how they did in and with the platinum jubilee the pride the comradery the History envied by countries throughout the world, tell me a country in the world with a dictator or president that has national pride stability freedom and unity as the U.K. and commonwealth. It has worked for 1,400 + years and works for me. many more benefits also and too many to mention Which is why a constitutional monarchy will always trump a republic. It allows the nation to express its soul.
direct royalty-related tourism brings in approx £550 million. Last year the monarchy contributed around £1.8 billion to the UK economy. The taxpayer pays around two pounds per year each for our great and wonderful monarchy and proud ancient traditions
How much money does the monarchy bring to the UK? Some £1.8 bn a year…and our ancient and proud traditions intact.
Brand Finance, which bills itself as the world’s leading brand valuation consultancy, estimated that the royals contributed 1.8 billion pounds ($2.2 bn) to the UK economy in 2020 through a combination of the Crown Estate’s revenues and indirect benefits for tourism, trade, media and the arts real estate and heritage sites, foreign investment and much more
This leftie is looking down at her homework all the time she needs to know How much money does the monarchy bring to the UK? Some £1.8 bn a year…and our ancient and proud traditions intact.
Brand Finance, which bills itself as the world’s leading brand valuation consultancy, estimated that the royals contributed 1.8 billion pounds ($2.2 bn) to the UK economy in 2020 through a combination of the Crown Estate’s revenues and indirect benefits for tourism, trade, media and the arts real estate and heritage sites, foreign investment and much more