If you like what you see and want to stay up to date with Dad Saves America, please subscribe here on UA-cam or over on Substack, where you can find weekly articles and the audio version of the podcast, with more to come in the near future! www.dadsavesamerica.com
Quick question for you, I wanted to use a link to one of your videos in the third book I’m publishing, in the final chapter on fighting hyperpolarization and finding common ground and shared values across America. 🇺🇸 One section discusses common grievances - and dives into the economic hypocrisy and harm of affluent progressives failing to live up to their values. You did a video on this (listening to someone break it down, blue cities and unaffordable housing, zoning issues, etc), but I can’t find the video. If you have any idea where it is / its title please 🙏 please let me know! Many thanks and keep up the awesome work
my apologies, it was a different video, ua-cam.com/video/hNDgcjVGHIw/v-deo.html I saw it months ago and saw lots of your stuff and somehow my brain merged the two together...:op
I recommend Rachel Wilson's book, "Occult Feminism: The Secret History of Women's Liberation." Also, "Witches, Feminism, and the Fall of the West" by Edward Dutton is another good one. First wave feminism did not have such an innocent start either, it seems.
I haven't read the book yet but I do know that suffragettes were aristocratic women who would let the impoverished women take all the punishment and buy their way out of it, with the backing of capitalistic men. Nothing new under the sun.
So what? Why does it have to be innocent and how could it be innocent when women are blamed for "Man's" downfall since Eden. Of course that narrative was BS
"Complicated reasons" for women not being chief architects of philosophy, among other areas, she claims was "not having the opportunity" is nonsense. Men like to invent, are good at it, and should not be castigated for it. Nor should their inventiveness be spun by feminists as unfair advantage. To this day, inventiveness can be seen--measured even--as overwhelmingly overrepresented (to use a leftwing term) by men, with more than 9 out of 10 patents filed BY MEN. If men are good at inventing, let them! If men are good at writing philosophy, let them! If men are good at this or that, let them! People like this woman need to stop spinning the achievements of men as "patriarchy." This woman and all women like her have a FAR EASIER LIFE than anyone (men or women) in the centuries before us. No matter what, as long as they are allowed to hold the microphone, they will complain.
It’s not nonsense if it was forbidden by law and shunned culturally for them to have access to certain fields. Sure it may have skewed to be more of a men thing just on an interest basis but it’s def more to it
@@wellDamnJamz Your point isn't clear. It sounds like more complaining. Yeah, some cultures have laws forbidding women from working, namely Muslim cultures. And ironically the Left defend the honor of these cultures. You should also note that in these cultures MANY women support these laws, defend them, and wish to seem them spread around the world. Does your cultural sensitivity acquiesce to their wishes? Because you can't have it both ways.
@@sebastianmosqueda5959 That's the rumour. I know a couple who are married, but their wives have experienced some bad stuff from men, so these guys are perhaps being very protective. Abused women cannot stand criticisms of feminism.
All of the waves are the same. From the very beginning, it has been about promoting a false narrative, destroying families and demonizing men. There is no defending feminism.
2nd wave, seemed to start with equality, but it pretty fast moved over to thinking the only way we can get equality, is by becoming communists. But non of them seemed to observe how life was in the communist countries or be willing to fight for woman in those countries, proving the movement had already been taken over by people with other goals. 3rd wave, seemed to be them merging with all the other movements that had been taken over by communists. So you could no longer claim to be a feminist, unless you also supported the black panthers or the lgbt movement. Losing even more of it's support for woman but rather just be a controlled group for the communists. and the 4th wave seem to be about claiming to be victims, to gather support and cash. So, the Metwo movement, except we know they did not care about victims, since non of them spoke out against Epstein, P.Diddy or Bill Clinton. They where still only trying to push society left. And you notice how quick metwo vanished when it turned out how most abusers where left wing .
It was never about Equality. The "First Wave" demanded their rights, while refusing to lobby for Equality in conscription. It was ALWAYS a cynical ploy for domination by the majority group that is talked about as if it's the minority...
The latest 'thinking' - read desiring or demanding - is for a complete reversal of what previous generations of feminists sought. Today's young women just want a pampered lifestyle, because they're worth it, because they deserve it, because they're all queens.
Yes, the pregnant man crap is a sign that US society has lost its mind. I guess having too much freedom and wealth causes us to have stupid thoughts and goals… part of a weakened male society. China is looking at this and now realizing that we may be ripe for a take over, but no need to worry because they are doing it without firing a shot because they know the one great weakness of US men is the greed and the CCP is using it 10 different way to destroy the US from the inside out.
Oh wow, it had been a while since I last saw Miss Hoff Summers on a podcast. I guess she took a hiatus from the insanity, good for her in any case, but happy to see her back! Love you Christina, keep talking that sense!
sorry but NO feminism has not gone wrong it ALWAYS WAS a hate movement see the work of Janice Fiamengo on the hate brought forth being the Seneca Falls Declaration of Sentiments -a feminist manifesto from 1848
No offense to Dr. Sommers (I really appreciate what she's done to push back against misandry), but I have my doubts about feminism being itself coming from liberalism. My suspicion is that it was Marxist, and spiritualist (with Gnostic influences), from the beginning. At the least, I would need to be convinced that a Marxist model isn't the natural conclusion of the liberal model. In any case, I recommend abandoning the feminist label entirely now. The ideology is overwhelmingly Marxist and Marxists are more than happy to use "moderates" as shields (Marxists often call them useful idiots) to defend their insane ideas. If you want fairness and cooperation between the sexes, I'd strongly suggest using a different label for that. Feminism is a completely unsalvageable label for such a position.
Exactly, she says that pregnancy discrimination is absurd. It is not. Women take time off of work and this is a burden on the employer. Feminism was always about getting rid of monogamy, getting rid of the father, getting rid of the family and getting rid of sexual morals.
I think a lot of issues like this come from movements overstaying their welcome and having to become more and more extreme to stay relevant. Women are doing just fine in modern society (at least relative to men), so original feminism has largely served its purpose
Women are doing terribly in modern society.What are you talking about? Feminism sure has been effective though. American families are completely destroyed, and men are viciously hated and discriminated against. That's what feminism has been from the first wave until now.
Women got everything they demanded, yet they didn't get what they actually wanted. So instead of reassessing what they demanded, they instead demand more, and more, and more, thinking they must be missing something still. Women are less happy than in the past. Men aren't. The 'advances' of women backfired on themselves. Yet instead of stepping back to see where they went wrong, they plow ahead, no matter what cliff is in front of them.
It only makes sense that if men are susceptible to a military draft then women should be susceptible to a breeding draft. Both non-immigrant based population maintenance and military recruitment are pillars of a country’s survival.
For men, the ability to vote is inextricably tied to military conscription. Voting requires a fundamental commitment to the society & country. There is nothing comparable for women. Requiring women to also be drafted is a waste. It does not benefit the military or the security of the country & society.
Is the problem with feminism that it was always going to end up this way? Is it the same with liberalism? The question is what is the limiting factor in either of these ideologies?
@@artemishumaan6984 There was a bill introduced in June 2024 that would have opened up Selective Service requirements for women but it died. Women still can't register for the draft.
This is a great breakdown. My main issue with modern radical leftist ideology of most all kinds is its dogmatism and narrow religious style thinking . That’s annoying and delusional at best and dangerous and harmful at worst
There were dishwashers, washing machines and electric stoves. The real deal. Without them, such a movement would have been impossible to succeed. That's why the suffragettes were not successful at the beginning of the 20th century. If you have to wash clothes in a washtub with a scratch board for a family of seven, you don't have time for that. That's why the movement was only really successful in the 60s. Those who were not helped by technical progress were men. Until today, because capitalism ruled them. You now have a modern combine harvester and can do the work you used to do in half the time? Tough luck, now you do twice as much. That didn't happen in the home. Electric appliances really saved time. But women have been tricked into the men's sphere and are now stuck there with us...😂
It was, because back then these women's rights were not taken for granted in society, so some women had to fight for that, and they were called Feminists, even Christina considered herself a feminist, like her friend Camille Paglia
@@lyes-ot6it The campaign for women's rights long precedes the arrival of CHS and CP. Feminism is just the militant, anti-male, chauvinistic wing of the women's rights movement.
This demographic is quite confused. A feminist got angry with me for saying that men and women are different. Then this feminist told me that I can’t have an opinion on abortion because I don’t have a uterus… unknowingly, admitting that men and women are different,
@@junxu4438 Um... first day on the internet? Yes, they will argue with you. There's something called Gener Ideology that argues that your gender is determined by an innate feeling.
In Czechia a psychologist and coach and their wives created programs for men to improve marriage, or understand how to talk to partner and understand them better, because thye didnt have proper role models to learn it, because men and women are different men learn to be more masculine, women more feminine, because when man becomes more masculine the woman becomes authomatically more feminine, she feels more heard by the man, ňmen started understanding that bringing home monye isnt enough, that he has to be also romantically involved and tell her, you look nice today, she feeôlls like she is wanted, they meet face to face onm seminars with other men with same problems...the wives of these coaches do similar progarm for women, how to raise kids, how to understand psychology of 1 years old child, how to understand psychology of 3 years old child.... 6 years old, because their mentality changes every year, how to talk to them , to make them feel confident, how to talk to husband....how women should talk to girfriend , colleague etc. Improve communication skills, empathy etc they have very positive results. The wife of the psychologist is a former body trainer for women, but she is very nice lady. Maybe thye should make in evcery country this kind of semoinars face to face in some restaurant or building whewre thye just learn the tips about proper communication with partner and with children. The men say they hewaled from alcohol or other addictions and anxiety etc, because if the practical skills, they learned and have very nice realtionship with wife and the kids. They have two programs, one is "Restart of man", "having a loving wife as a life standard" (heal porn addiction and alcohol addiction, running from life, becoming masculine man, unlearń bad habits from childhood, from lack of good role models, its not your faultz because we all were raised differently) The psychpologist is very excelent at understanding the little babies brain and what they need, he had never problems with his son who is 18 now...the son followed instructions without being noisy etc. because he knew how to talk patiently with child, and yet set boundaries, ask proper questions, that created great trust. He says children are misbehaving only if they dont feel th eparent is trustworthy leader of the family. The other coach is also good, their wives as well. The other program is about "raising children"... how to talk to children since their birth so the children will feel trust toward their parents and children wants to have good leader as parent, because they can trust them better understanding the psychology of children what they feel at certain age, how to set boundaries, how to teach them skills, without conflict etc and they also practice different situations in seminars. But they noticed that women who already changed for better and understand all the tips, of good relationship she wants to have strong leader by her side someone who also understand empathy and how to talk to kids, how to raise family, if he isnt strong.... or he is in very slow process of changing, a they are not good match for each other, because he is stil hesitating etc. Or there was other case. that a man was dating new woman..... he was already very good for the relationship, he learned everything from the seminar, but his new girlfriend wasnt there yet, .....she didnt understand all the skills and tips yet, about how the masculine and feminine energy works between them and how to talk to each other.....so he broke up with her, and she once wrote a letter to the coaches, that If I would meet him 3 monts later after the taking the seminar, we would be perfect match for each other.
My friend knows a guy that believes that the worst thing that ever happened was giving women the right to vote. I pointed out that the countries with relative equality for women are wealthy democracies. The fewer rights women have the crappier things get.
If women's suffrage were the factor, then the divergence in wealth between those sets of countries should have started after women started voting. However, it began long before. Western nations were becoming wealthier through trade, industry, etc. centuries before women were voting. The difference for why some countries became wealthy and others have not is far older and more basic than women voting.
In all likelihood, you've reversed cause and effect. Those wealthy Western nations likely only gave women the right to vote because they felt safe enough to allow it. Their judgement may have been mistaken.
If a woman is paying taxes, she has the right to vote. It's her money that is paying the politician's salary so she gets to have a say. If you don't want women to vote, then we don't have to pay taxes. Bring back debtors prisons if that's the case.
@karenclark266 If a man is subject to the draft, he should get an extra vote. It's his life that's being expended to protect EXCLUSIVELY women. If you want women to have equal rights, force them to have equal responsibilities. Of course, women aren't interested in equality, just the appearance of equality while exercising dominance.
I'm so tired of people defining things incorrectly and then pushing false narratives that make their point but don't actually have much validity when judged by actual history. Feminists for one were never anything different. How do people not notice the constant, "this form of feminism at this mythical time was pure and that is what we should return to," is the same exact thing conservatives do when talking about some mythical time period that they would return society when everything was what they wanted, while conviniently forgetting things like what the tax rate was during the time periods they are talking about. Feminism is a supremacist movement. It has nothing to do with Marx and it is getting BORING listening to you people repeat the same nonsense over and over. This is another thing that is just clearly a repeat of another thing that is just getting old and isn't even good propaganda. Why does this pattern continue to repeat itself among your cohort? Why do your arguments not evolve? Why is it you just expect to say things like Soros, and just think everyone will have the same freak out as you? The George Soros thing is another thing I personally don't get. First of all, he is a billionaire which means he is right wing. Second he isn't even that rich, but somehow he has been funding every conspiracy to come out of your brain for the last 30 years, so why has he not gone broke yet? And then when people richer than him do all of the things you say he does, it is ignored because they are on your side? You know this stuff is very noticeable, right? You guys need to Lear how to craft arguments again. This tried and true return to Cold War talking points is extremely lazy and shows a clear lack of intelligence since any outside observer knows that both of the parties in the US are right wing liberal parties.
Marxism is a supremacist ideology, so your premise is already flawed. Then you waffle on myopically about subjects you clearly don't understand and attribute to the conservatives the lack of understanding brought on by your philosophical myopia.
As a marxist who studies marxist theory and organizes with hundreds of other marxists, feminism is not a marxist concept. Its progressive but that doesnt make it marxist.
But then you also deny a long list of the worst atrocities committed along with fact that his father thought he was a monster, and the hypocrisy that his aunt was married to Nathan Rothschild who purchased the land in the Levant.
The Post Modern movement in the US has used the Marxist paradigm of oppressor and oppressed for various categories. Instead of Capitalist and Proletariat, it’s whites and blacks, men and women (patriarchy), straight and gay, sex (gender) and trans. The big difference is Marxist had the class difference. US leftists have given up on class and instead have used these other differences based on oppressor/oppressed. It’s the tearing down of all standards. See the four olds from the Cultural Revolution.
If you like what you see and want to stay up to date with Dad Saves America, please subscribe here on UA-cam or over on Substack, where you can find weekly articles and the audio version of the podcast, with more to come in the near future!
www.dadsavesamerica.com
Quick question for you, I wanted to use a link to one of your videos in the third book I’m publishing, in the final chapter on fighting hyperpolarization and finding common ground and shared values across America. 🇺🇸
One section discusses common grievances - and dives into the economic hypocrisy and harm of affluent progressives failing to live up to their values. You did a video on this (listening to someone break it down, blue cities and unaffordable housing, zoning issues, etc), but I can’t find the video.
If you have any idea where it is / its title please 🙏 please let me know! Many thanks and keep up the awesome work
my apologies, it was a different video, ua-cam.com/video/hNDgcjVGHIw/v-deo.html
I saw it months ago and saw lots of your stuff and somehow my brain merged the two together...:op
She is absolutely wrong, there really is no difference between liberal feminism and marxist feminism.
I recommend Rachel Wilson's book, "Occult Feminism: The Secret History of Women's Liberation." Also, "Witches, Feminism, and the Fall of the West" by Edward Dutton is another good one. First wave feminism did not have such an innocent start either, it seems.
I haven't read the book yet but I do know that suffragettes were aristocratic women who would let the impoverished women take all the punishment and buy their way out of it, with the backing of capitalistic men. Nothing new under the sun.
Marx and Engels were strongly endorsing all of the tenets of Feminism DECADES before the "First Wave."
"Equality" is just the motte.
So what? Why does it have to be innocent and how could it be innocent when women are blamed for "Man's" downfall since Eden. Of course that narrative was BS
@@roryteal5940 I recommend the books I cited if you want more answers.
It’s amazing how people will follow an ideology but don’t know anything about the history of it … kind of sounds like a cult mindset
"Complicated reasons" for women not being chief architects of philosophy, among other areas, she claims was "not having the opportunity" is nonsense. Men like to invent, are good at it, and should not be castigated for it. Nor should their inventiveness be spun by feminists as unfair advantage. To this day, inventiveness can be seen--measured even--as overwhelmingly overrepresented (to use a leftwing term) by men, with more than 9 out of 10 patents filed BY MEN. If men are good at inventing, let them! If men are good at writing philosophy, let them! If men are good at this or that, let them! People like this woman need to stop spinning the achievements of men as "patriarchy." This woman and all women like her have a FAR EASIER LIFE than anyone (men or women) in the centuries before us.
No matter what, as long as they are allowed to hold the microphone, they will complain.
You nailed it,men and women,are not equal but are to function as a team,with very different abilities,to survive there children,in theirlife to come
It’s not nonsense if it was forbidden by law and shunned culturally for them to have access to certain fields. Sure it may have skewed to be more of a men thing just on an interest basis but it’s def more to it
@@wellDamnJamz Your point isn't clear. It sounds like more complaining. Yeah, some cultures have laws forbidding women from working, namely Muslim cultures. And ironically the Left defend the honor of these cultures. You should also note that in these cultures MANY women support these laws, defend them, and wish to seem them spread around the world. Does your cultural sensitivity acquiesce to their wishes? Because you can't have it both ways.
Glad this clip hasn't been taken down yet John! Good on you sir to repost!
Absolutely LOVE everything Dad Saved America does!
Feminism is the status quo. It is a reactionary movement that appeals to the rebellious self-interested young women (and some men)
Men?
@@eric45005 Well, there are male feminists.
@@eric45005men who side with pro unaliving potential children are basically feminists
@markaurelius61 Pretty sure their just trying to get laid.
@@sebastianmosqueda5959 That's the rumour. I know a couple who are married, but their wives have experienced some bad stuff from men, so these guys are perhaps being very protective. Abused women cannot stand criticisms of feminism.
She’s a second wave feminist. Equality. First wave was for the vote. No one can explain the third and fourth waves.
All of the waves are the same. From the very beginning, it has been about promoting a false narrative, destroying families and demonizing men. There is no defending feminism.
2nd wave, seemed to start with equality, but it pretty fast moved over to thinking the only way we can get equality, is by becoming communists.
But non of them seemed to observe how life was in the communist countries or be willing to fight for woman in those countries, proving the movement had already been taken over by people with other goals.
3rd wave, seemed to be them merging with all the other movements that had been taken over by communists. So you could no longer claim to be a feminist, unless you also supported the black panthers or the lgbt movement. Losing even more of it's support for woman but rather just be a controlled group for the communists.
and the 4th wave seem to be about claiming to be victims, to gather support and cash. So, the Metwo movement, except we know they did not care about victims, since non of them spoke out against Epstein, P.Diddy or Bill Clinton.
They where still only trying to push society left. And you notice how quick metwo vanished when it turned out how most abusers where left wing .
It was never about Equality.
The "First Wave" demanded their rights, while refusing to lobby for Equality in conscription. It was ALWAYS a cynical ploy for domination by the majority group that is talked about as if it's the minority...
we can. Its about power and the desire to create an authoritarian world.
The latest 'thinking' - read desiring or demanding - is for a complete reversal of what previous generations of feminists sought. Today's young women just want a pampered lifestyle, because they're worth it, because they deserve it, because they're all queens.
I support equality. An employer should be able to fire a man just because he gets pregnant, too.
Yes, the pregnant man crap is a sign that US society has lost its mind. I guess having too much freedom and wealth causes us to have stupid thoughts and goals… part of a weakened male society. China is looking at this and now realizing that we may be ripe for a take over, but no need to worry because they are doing it without firing a shot because they know the one great weakness of US men is the greed and the CCP is using it 10 different way to destroy the US from the inside out.
For sure 😂
Men can’t get pregnant.
Oh wow, it had been a while since I last saw Miss Hoff Summers on a podcast. I guess she took a hiatus from the insanity, good for her in any case, but happy to see her back! Love you Christina, keep talking that sense!
sorry but NO
feminism has not gone wrong
it ALWAYS WAS a hate movement
see the work of Janice Fiamengo on the hate brought forth being the Seneca Falls Declaration of Sentiments -a feminist manifesto from 1848
Stfu it has gone wrong
Equality doesnt exist when it comes to loev, emotions, empathy, compassion... it has no measurement.
as grass has no measurement.
No offense to Dr. Sommers (I really appreciate what she's done to push back against misandry), but I have my doubts about feminism being itself coming from liberalism. My suspicion is that it was Marxist, and spiritualist (with Gnostic influences), from the beginning. At the least, I would need to be convinced that a Marxist model isn't the natural conclusion of the liberal model. In any case, I recommend abandoning the feminist label entirely now. The ideology is overwhelmingly Marxist and Marxists are more than happy to use "moderates" as shields (Marxists often call them useful idiots) to defend their insane ideas. If you want fairness and cooperation between the sexes, I'd strongly suggest using a different label for that. Feminism is a completely unsalvageable label for such a position.
Exactly, she says that pregnancy discrimination is absurd. It is not. Women take time off of work and this is a burden on the employer. Feminism was always about getting rid of monogamy, getting rid of the father, getting rid of the family and getting rid of sexual morals.
Or maybe our forefathers were right.
I can think of 19reasons how they were.
She really articulates very well on the subject and others. Thanks for posting
I think a lot of issues like this come from movements overstaying their welcome and having to become more and more extreme to stay relevant. Women are doing just fine in modern society (at least relative to men), so original feminism has largely served its purpose
Women are doing terribly in modern society.What are you talking about? Feminism sure has been effective though. American families are completely destroyed, and men are viciously hated and discriminated against. That's what feminism has been from the first wave until now.
Women got everything they demanded, yet they didn't get what they actually wanted. So instead of reassessing what they demanded, they instead demand more, and more, and more, thinking they must be missing something still.
Women are less happy than in the past. Men aren't. The 'advances' of women backfired on themselves. Yet instead of stepping back to see where they went wrong, they plow ahead, no matter what cliff is in front of them.
It only makes sense that if men are susceptible to a military draft then women should be susceptible to a breeding draft. Both non-immigrant based population maintenance and military recruitment are pillars of a country’s survival.
For men, the ability to vote is inextricably tied to military conscription. Voting requires a fundamental commitment to the society & country. There is nothing comparable for women.
Requiring women to also be drafted is a waste. It does not benefit the military or the security of the country & society.
It only makes sense if you aren't a disingenuous misandrist.
Is the problem with feminism that it was always going to end up this way? Is it the same with liberalism? The question is what is the limiting factor in either of these ideologies?
yes it was always going to end up this way.
Can a woman portray a female Superman and at the same time portray a woman? Equivalency versus Equality.
DC already have WonderWoman and Supergirl.
Thank you
0:01 right away, feminism was not the same as the women's movement. Those are two different movements.
Yea they cant be drafted tho right lol
No but you should
Yes they can. All have selective service cards now I believe
@@artemishumaan6984 There was a bill introduced in June 2024 that would have opened up Selective Service requirements for women but it died. Women still can't register for the draft.
@@HeathenGranny i was in the military during desert storm
@@artemishumaan6984 no they dont it just got dropped in the senate
This is a great breakdown. My main issue with modern radical leftist ideology of most all kinds is its dogmatism and narrow religious style thinking . That’s annoying and delusional at best and dangerous and harmful at worst
Whoa Based Mom on Dad Saves America?!?! Awesome!!!
Sorry but Women’s Rights was not Feminism.
There were dishwashers, washing machines and electric stoves. The real deal. Without them, such a movement would have been impossible to succeed. That's why the suffragettes were not successful at the beginning of the 20th century. If you have to wash clothes in a washtub with a scratch board for a family of seven, you don't have time for that. That's why
the movement was only really successful in the 60s. Those who were not helped by technical progress were men. Until today, because capitalism ruled them. You now have a modern combine harvester and can do the work you used to do in half the time? Tough luck, now you do twice as much. That didn't happen in the home. Electric appliances really saved time.
But women have been tricked into the men's sphere and are now stuck there with us...😂
It was, because back then these women's rights were not taken for granted in society, so some women had to fight for that, and they were called Feminists, even Christina considered herself a feminist, like her friend Camille Paglia
@@lyes-ot6it The campaign for women's rights long precedes the arrival of CHS and CP. Feminism is just the militant, anti-male, chauvinistic wing of the women's rights movement.
This demographic is quite confused. A feminist got angry with me for saying that men and women are different.
Then this feminist told me that I can’t have an opinion on abortion because I don’t have a uterus… unknowingly, admitting that men and women are different,
Next time, just say you identify as a woman.
It’s vague and meaningless to say man and women are different, if you say women have uterus and men don’t, nobody will argue with you.
@@junxu4438 Um... first day on the internet?
Yes, they will argue with you. There's something called Gener Ideology that argues that your gender is determined by an innate feeling.
@junx, its vague and meaningless because he didn't give all the details of the conversation and the context.
Someone has said that having a degree in Gender Studies may be a red flag to a prospective employer.
I'm going to have to disagree that feminism was ever liberal.
Where we are followed inevitably from where we were.
In Czechia a psychologist and coach and their wives created programs for men to improve marriage, or understand how to talk to partner and understand them better,
because thye didnt have proper role models to learn it, because men and women are different
men learn to be more masculine, women more feminine,
because when man becomes more masculine the woman becomes authomatically more feminine, she feels more heard by the man,
ňmen started understanding that bringing home monye isnt enough, that he has to be also romantically involved and tell her, you look nice today, she feeôlls like she is wanted,
they meet face to face onm seminars with other men with same problems...the wives of these coaches do similar progarm for women, how to raise kids, how to understand psychology of 1 years old child, how to understand psychology of 3 years old child.... 6 years old, because their mentality changes every year, how to talk to them , to make them feel confident, how to talk to husband....how women should talk to girfriend , colleague etc. Improve communication skills, empathy etc
they have very positive results. The wife of the psychologist is a former body trainer for women, but she is very nice lady.
Maybe thye should make in evcery country this kind of semoinars face to face in some restaurant or building whewre thye just learn the tips about proper communication with partner and with children. The men say they hewaled from alcohol or other addictions and anxiety etc, because if the practical skills, they learned and have very nice realtionship with wife and the kids.
They have two programs,
one is "Restart of man", "having a loving wife as a life standard"
(heal porn addiction and alcohol addiction, running from life, becoming masculine man, unlearń bad habits from childhood, from lack of good role models, its not your faultz because we all were raised differently)
The psychpologist is very excelent at understanding the little babies brain and what they need, he had never problems with his son who is 18 now...the son followed instructions without being noisy etc.
because he knew how to talk patiently with child, and yet set boundaries, ask proper questions, that created great trust.
He says children are misbehaving only if they dont feel th eparent is trustworthy leader of the family.
The other coach is also good, their wives as well.
The other program is about "raising children"... how to talk to children since their birth so the children will feel trust toward their parents
and children wants to have good leader as parent, because they can trust them better
understanding the psychology of children what they feel at certain age, how to set boundaries, how to teach them skills, without conflict etc
and they also practice different situations in seminars.
But they noticed that women who already changed for better and understand all the tips, of good relationship
she wants to have strong leader by her side someone who also understand empathy and how to talk to kids, how to raise family, if he isnt strong....
or he is in very slow process of changing, a they are not good match for each other, because he is stil hesitating etc.
Or there was other case. that a man was dating new woman..... he was already very good for the relationship, he learned everything from the seminar, but his new girlfriend wasnt there yet, .....she didnt understand all the skills and tips yet, about how the masculine and feminine energy works between them and how to talk to each other.....so he broke up with her,
and she once wrote a letter to the coaches, that If I would meet him 3 monts later after the taking the seminar, we would be perfect match for each other.
Marxism and liberalism are the same path at different points.
"Why don't you tell me comrade and brother how do you treat the old woman back home?"
- John Lennon, Power to the People
Based mom is still based.
It isn't possible to be a feminist and be based. She is a liar. Feminism was always about hatefulness and destruction of men and society.
My friend knows a guy that believes that the worst thing that ever happened was giving women the right to vote. I pointed out that the countries with relative equality for women are wealthy democracies. The fewer rights women have the crappier things get.
those countries were wealthy if you look at the debt they have accrued in the last 100 years. Look at Dubai vs Detroit, Shanghai vs San Francisco.
If women's suffrage were the factor, then the divergence in wealth between those sets of countries should have started after women started voting. However, it began long before. Western nations were becoming wealthier through trade, industry, etc. centuries before women were voting. The difference for why some countries became wealthy and others have not is far older and more basic than women voting.
In all likelihood, you've reversed cause and effect.
Those wealthy Western nations likely only gave women the right to vote because they felt safe enough to allow it. Their judgement may have been mistaken.
If a woman is paying taxes, she has the right to vote. It's her money that is paying the politician's salary so she gets to have a say. If you don't want women to vote, then we don't have to pay taxes. Bring back debtors prisons if that's the case.
@karenclark266 If a man is subject to the draft, he should get an extra vote. It's his life that's being expended to protect EXCLUSIVELY women.
If you want women to have equal rights, force them to have equal responsibilities. Of course, women aren't interested in equality, just the appearance of equality while exercising dominance.
Picture the meme in your heads. “Always was.”
Reduce everything to absolute truth.... like plastic surgery where the person looks like artificial figure.
Did Feminism get renamed. If so then who all renamed it.
LOVE Christina.
Follow the money.
Ironically you all are gonna put us right back to were we started lol
I'm so tired of people defining things incorrectly and then pushing false narratives that make their point but don't actually have much validity when judged by actual history. Feminists for one were never anything different. How do people not notice the constant, "this form of feminism at this mythical time was pure and that is what we should return to," is the same exact thing conservatives do when talking about some mythical time period that they would return society when everything was what they wanted, while conviniently forgetting things like what the tax rate was during the time periods they are talking about. Feminism is a supremacist movement. It has nothing to do with Marx and it is getting BORING listening to you people repeat the same nonsense over and over. This is another thing that is just clearly a repeat of another thing that is just getting old and isn't even good propaganda. Why does this pattern continue to repeat itself among your cohort? Why do your arguments not evolve? Why is it you just expect to say things like Soros, and just think everyone will have the same freak out as you? The George Soros thing is another thing I personally don't get. First of all, he is a billionaire which means he is right wing. Second he isn't even that rich, but somehow he has been funding every conspiracy to come out of your brain for the last 30 years, so why has he not gone broke yet? And then when people richer than him do all of the things you say he does, it is ignored because they are on your side? You know this stuff is very noticeable, right? You guys need to Lear how to craft arguments again. This tried and true return to Cold War talking points is extremely lazy and shows a clear lack of intelligence since any outside observer knows that both of the parties in the US are right wing liberal parties.
Marxism is a supremacist ideology, so your premise is already flawed. Then you waffle on myopically about subjects you clearly don't understand and attribute to the conservatives the lack of understanding brought on by your philosophical myopia.
As a marxist who studies marxist theory and organizes with hundreds of other marxists, feminism is not a marxist concept. Its progressive but that doesnt make it marxist.
But then you also deny a long list of the worst atrocities committed along with fact that his father thought he was a monster, and the hypocrisy that his aunt was married to Nathan Rothschild who purchased the land in the Levant.
The Post Modern movement in the US has used the Marxist paradigm of oppressor and oppressed for various categories. Instead of Capitalist and Proletariat, it’s whites and blacks, men and women (patriarchy), straight and gay, sex (gender) and trans. The big difference is Marxist had the class difference. US leftists have given up on class and instead have used these other differences based on oppressor/oppressed. It’s the tearing down of all standards. See the four olds from the Cultural Revolution.
The raised fist is the communist salute... feminism is identity politics, a tool of Marxism... yeah, it's Marxist...
Why does everything need to be labeled to fit in a certain box?
@@robertholland7558 There are scholars that write books about this stuff. It’s what they call it.
Blah blah blah 😴