I remember subscribing to you ages ago, but I stopped watching your videos. When I was going through all my subscriptions, trying to thin them down, I found you again and I have been binge watching your videos. I love Dinosaurs and my goal is t become a Palaeontologist. Not relevant but I just wanted to say that, and I will be watching you again a lot more!
Great review, and a very nice figure! I actually saw the new Allosaurus from Schleich at my local shop last week, I was pleasantly surprised at the gorgeous scaling detail on it. However, I didn't get it due to overpricing and some odd parts on the sculpt. I must say their detail is getting very nice, they just need to work on the actual sculpts on some of their figures.
On ED I reccomend If you dont wanna waste 20 or more pound on a gigantic and very realistic looking PAPO figure. OR would you buy a smaller, better priced, less realistic? I must say I cant make a decision on PAPO or shleich, both are VERY good!
Please review the new collects Regaliceratops, it's so little compared to their other ceratopsians, also if you haven't got their new styracosaurus, get it, it's better than the papo triceratops
Are you saying that Brachiosaurus DIDN'T have an arch on its' head, and that that iconic arch that it's usually depicted with belonged to Giraffatitan instead?
It had an arch, it was just smaller. Here's a comparison of Brachiosaurus and Giraffatitan: scotthartman.deviantart.com/art/Brachiosaur-Comparison-169574617
I don't understand all the picking on inaccurate renditions to be honest. Sure, it's really nice when a figure is accurate if that is what one is looking for. But figures or generally toys don't always have to be about accuracy and I think can also alter certain features in creative ways or make a creature look more picture-book like or cartoony for example. Have you ever looked at plush for example? Almost all plush toys are the furthest away from accuracy as they could get and you can still recognize the animal. I think if you recognize the animal it can be a good figure even if it's not scientifically accurate. It is meant to be a representation of the animal which can have artisitic freedoms. This is not to say that really scientifically accurate figures are bad though. They are awesome, but I just don't think every figure _has_ to be super accurate and I honestly don't get the hate some figures get. I especially don't get the hate Schleich often gets. Yes, their models might not be accurate, but Schleich makes really great figures and I don't really understand why some think they are worse at rendering figures aside from the accuracy aspect. Additionally, I really think if a brand decides to make an inaccurate figure it's not because they simply failed to do it accurately but because they simply decided not to. These figures are designed by experts and professionals, if they wanted to make accurate models they could. It's all about what customers are looking for and what sells better and as long as people don't care primarily about accuracy (which in my opinion is not a crime) then they will not be preassured to make all their figures super accurate.
![Lp. The Heart of the Universe #2 THE MAIN CRYSTAL [Universe Connection] • Minecraft](/img/n.gif)
I buyed one today
I remember subscribing to you ages ago, but I stopped watching your videos. When I was going through all my subscriptions, trying to thin them down, I found you again and I have been binge watching your videos. I love Dinosaurs and my goal is t become a Palaeontologist. Not relevant but I just wanted to say that, and I will be watching you again a lot more!
Great review, and a very nice figure! I actually saw the new Allosaurus from Schleich at my local shop last week, I was pleasantly surprised at the gorgeous scaling detail on it. However, I didn't get it due to overpricing and some odd parts on the sculpt. I must say their detail is getting very nice, they just need to work on the actual sculpts on some of their figures.
Awesome Review!
I have the 2012 one! I like this model!
Are you getting any other Schleich models this year?
The colours remind me of Poppa Henry from the Good Dinosaur a bit.
nice video
Nice review dude! :)
Thanks. I still like 2007 best bit similar to 2012 but lot bigger.
On ED I reccomend If you dont wanna waste 20 or more pound on a gigantic and very realistic looking PAPO figure. OR would you buy a smaller, better priced, less realistic? I must say I cant make a decision on PAPO or shleich, both are VERY good!
Please review the new collects Regaliceratops, it's so little compared to their other ceratopsians, also if you haven't got their new styracosaurus, get it, it's better than the papo triceratops
Are you saying that Brachiosaurus DIDN'T have an arch on its' head, and that that iconic arch that it's usually depicted with belonged to Giraffatitan instead?
Great review, BTW. As always. :)
It had an arch, it was just smaller. Here's a comparison of Brachiosaurus and Giraffatitan: scotthartman.deviantart.com/art/Brachiosaur-Comparison-169574617
cool figure but won't get it I have both old and new safari brachiosaurus's so ya
hI :)
nice but I think the head is too big in the legs are too large in the feet are too big.
I don't understand all the picking on inaccurate renditions to be honest. Sure, it's really nice when a figure is accurate if that is what one is looking for. But figures or generally toys don't always have to be about accuracy and I think can also alter certain features in creative ways or make a creature look more picture-book like or cartoony for example. Have you ever looked at plush for example? Almost all plush toys are the furthest away from accuracy as they could get and you can still recognize the animal. I think if you recognize the animal it can be a good figure even if it's not scientifically accurate. It is meant to be a representation of the animal which can have artisitic freedoms. This is not to say that really scientifically accurate figures are bad though. They are awesome, but I just don't think every figure _has_ to be super accurate and I honestly don't get the hate some figures get.
I especially don't get the hate Schleich often gets. Yes, their models might not be accurate, but Schleich makes really great figures and I don't really understand why some think they are worse at rendering figures aside from the accuracy aspect. Additionally, I really think if a brand decides to make an inaccurate figure it's not because they simply failed to do it accurately but because they simply decided not to. These figures are designed by experts and professionals, if they wanted to make accurate models they could. It's all about what customers are looking for and what sells better and as long as people don't care primarily about accuracy (which in my opinion is not a crime) then they will not be preassured to make all their figures super accurate.
I don't mean to be that person but apatosaurus and brontosaurus are the same Dino
Not anymore. A study published in 2015 showed that they are different species
Matthew The Dinosaur King well I am Stuck in the past
Ice_SpringTrap248 hahaha it’s ok lol