Are You CONSCIOUS Or PHYSICAL?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 9 тра 2024
- In this episode, I explore my thoughts on the differences between the Physical Paradigm and the Conscious Paradigm.
Previous videos:
- The Reason ANYTHING Exists: • The Reason ANYTHING Ex...
- The PERFECT Civilization: shorturl.at/asuL9
- ENDING The Crisis of Meaning: shorturl.at/DMPX0
- What do You BELIEVE?: shorturl.at/alJNR
#philosophy #metaphysics #science
Wow; you’ve done it again. I am going to have to lay down for a while to let that sink in, but try to both concentrate on this with eyes closed in a quiet space and remain conscious. 👍
I just finished my college philosophy class and still it has me in these loop holes that I enjoy being in because every idea is a start to another. Just found your yt channel but will be following along from now on 🤟🏽
He's back!
Just found this channel. Since my discovery of Lemmino, this is the happiest I've been upon discovering a UA-cam channel. ❤❤
Thank you very much! More to come in the future :)
Great video thanks. I’m in the idealist mindset however conceptualising how the highly detailed material world emerged from experience is very challenging!
18:36 Kants teaching of the categories in a nutshell
The Noumena may be a pure light or something related to light, as light being processed is what generates our reality from our consciousness. The consciousness is grounded and centered in a pure awareness that is inherently singular. So it may be possible that the physical and ideal realms are both equally grounded in a singularity of awareness and light unified in the common attribute of being. And with this philosophy goes back to Parimenides, who taught that the Truth is simply "it is" or in other words, being.
Another interesting project was dispersing random number generators around the earth, and monitoring them for synchronicity. They seemed to have a relationship to human events, spitting out more coincidental matches when large dramatic events were happening. I wish I could remember the name of the project....it may be ongoing. It seems related to this subject.
I think the way we should approach the problem of consciousness it to abandon the somewhat unfounded idea of and "I" separated from everything else. We don't experience feelings or sensations, we are the feelings and sensations. When you look at a green wall you are the green wall. It might seem silly to think like this but take it just one step further, add more colors, diversify them and you have a painting. When you look at a painting and it captures you attention, in that moment the painting is you, it shapes you thoughts, it takes hold of them and diverts the cognitive power to study itself, the colours the contrasts, and takes hold of your actions, makes you move to catch the light better. Is this not what it means to be you? To be the thing that shapes your thoughts and actions? And you might even become the painting permanently, a tiny bit of you at least, if the painting truly impacts you, from that moment forward your actions will be slightly different, influenced by the painting, and as such the painting will be making a little to your decisions and as such it will be a little of you. Like a bit of clay being added to a large one, it so happens that with the green wall the bit of clay is much smaller, but the difference is in scale not in nature.
I the Cartesian theater we must not see ourselves as the spectator but as the screen.
Yeah. I'd put it like this:
You don't HAVE perceptual fields,
You ARE your perceptual fields.
Wouldn't the double slit experiment represent an overlap of physical and consciousness?
No, it's the act of measurement that causes the change rather than consciousness itself. Like trying to measure a ball floating on a pool without moving the ball.
Materialism doesn't explain everything then [fill in blank] exists