He so many interesting things, with so many things to explore and in the first question, comes a person with some self involved personal story about how she had a birth mark...they must exausted of these kind of ppl, also this is the first video where in the comments ppl are talking about the cases not them selves! Thank you for sharing!
About the James Leininger case: There is another piece of specific information that I think merits an extra mention: Prof. Tucker says in the presentation that James flew a Corsair. And his engine had caught fire from oncoming flak. Now in my research when preparing for an interview with Prof. Tucker he kindly let us do, I happened upon a paragraph that talked about this particular type of plane and made a point that the surest way for an enemy to take it down was to fire into the engine located right at the tip of the "nose", which would pretty much always ignite fire, thus leading to the engine giving out and eventually stopping the front mounted propeller, effectively rendering the plane unmaneuverable. How could have young James possibly had such a piece of information that is most likely not known outside of circles of WWII air combat "buffs"? I think it adds to the specificity of the case underlining Prof. Tuckers and Dr. Stevenson's system of finding 200 variables, where the details the children mention either score high in number of accuracy or in regards to being very specific or both. And that - to me anyway - is very much the case here with young James at ages a hair shy of 2 years until later in his toddler years. I just added this to show that that system they've come up with to assess cases by sounds very plausible and dependable to my ears. (Just saying, as the expression goes)
There is no life after death. Near death and out of body experiences is just the brain going haywire and hallucinating when it is nearly dead as there is NOT enough oxygen getting to the brain when it is shutting down. Hours later if they are NOT revived their soul will no longer function and will go kaput. When you see a dead person (a corpse) their soul is still there with their dead body but it is no longer functioning. NDEs and OBEs is sort of just a last gasp before the soul burns out. However, if the concept of an eternally inflating multiverse is correct then sooner or later an exact remake of your soul would be created from scratch in some future universe somewhere else in the eternally inflating multiverse. Cosmic inflation is where our universe expanded so rapid for a very brief moment of time at the big bang. Inflation only ended in our part of space (our bubble universe) while other regions are still inflating. Once inflation starts, it never ends, producing an infinite number of bubble universes and each bubble universe would have their own big bang event. There are new universes being created all of the time at an ever increasing rate with new big bangs occurring forever. With an infinite number of big bangs repetitions of everything are inevitable. Your exact life you have lived so far and every other possible variation of your life is being lived right now by other exact copies of you living on exact copies of this Earth in other exact copies of our universe. An exact copy of you is NOT you because it has no link of being you. It's a person that has an exact copy of your soul (not your soul), has an exact copy of your consciousness (not your consciousness) and it has an exact copy of your brain (not your brain), absolutely no information is transferred other between copies, there is no intersection between copies, they are created from scratch (not the current you being recycled) they exist independently from you and they will think that they are you. Sorry, lights out and game over when you die. Life after death impossible by Sean Carroll here ua-cam.com/video/jUIjDncKZbM/v-deo.html and is our universe part of a multiverse? by Delia Perlov here ua-cam.com/video/6eaBPc_fLVs/v-deo.html ......
OK. @@bdm1000 But that was not exactly the point here. The point was that he knew about the specific vulnerability of these and other models where the easiest and most efficient way to down them was by firing onto the engine head on. _That_ what I meant to say in the addendum and how it appears unlikely he could have known that at this young age at pre internet, pre smartphone times and with information he could have at best obtained in books , libraries or maybe from the tales of adults he had overheard. Other than that, there was literally no way for him to know something this specific. That's the point here. I find the specification of type of fighter plane a little less relevant given the context. Interesting, but not the most relevant.
@@wesboundmusic But it is an important point that I am making, and you are still wrong about what you said. Let me preface this by saying I am on your side. I am a believer, but I'm also trying to help you defend James story against the naysayers. You can't do that if you mix up the facts. You said, "The point was that he knew about the specific vulnerability of these and other models where the easiest and most efficient way to down them was by firing onto the engine head on." No, that is incorrect. I know of no evidence James ever mentioned ANYTHING about the most efficient way to take down a plane especially the part about "firing onto the engine head on". As far as I know, James never said any such thing. He said things like, “That’s a Corsair. They used to get flat tires all the time! And they always wanted to turn left when they took off!”. Then his father Bruce would do research and fill in other information, but not this, nor can the details he later learned be attributed to James. They also said things like James had the "ability to distinguish between a Corsair and an Avenger." He knew the difference between a Tony and a Zero, what a drop tank was and things like that, but you need to make sure of your claims because even if you are on the right side of things you only make the naysayer's case for him or her when you get the facts wrong. Regarding the FM-2 Wildcat (the plane James Huston was shot down in), an example of his knowledge was when he mentioned an antenna on the plane that often got in the pilots way. His father Bruce had a model of an FM-2 that had no such antenna, but when he researched it he found out James was right. He also demonstrated he knew how to put his helmet on and go through the communication and other preparatory steps preparing for flight, but he never talked about how to take a plane down. The only thing that James said along those lines (about the engine of a plane taking down a plane) was when he said, "Mama, before I was born, I was a pilot, and my airplane got shot in the engine and it crashed in the water, and that's how I died." This is important because the eyewitness reports they later found confirmed his FM-2 Wildcat was indeed hit head on directly in the engine.
@@bdm1000 OK, I see where you're coming from and I think I understand. See, I referenced what I remember at the time of commenting and this was at least a year after I had conducted the interview and longer, if you added the amount of time of researching and preparing for it. Then I had to move on and in a matter of four weeks recap the history of nearly 100 years of Quantum Physics for the upcoming interview. So I hope I can be forgiven for not remembering the exact phrasing one year after doing the research and then needing to move on to the next thing not giving it all of my attention anymore after that. See, you say he, James, never said anything verbatim on the engine being the most vulnerable part in terms of fitness for combat. OK, not in so many words, correct. However, to me, the mere fact that he _mentions_ the engine getting hit by enemy fire as cause for the plane going down and him dying in the crash is the very thing that tells me that he had known about this detail like all the others you accurately reference. If it had not been known to him or if it had not been an important detail, he might have said something like 'my airplane got shot' without specifically mentioning the engine. In that way, his account would have sounded much closer to fabrication than if he added this particular aspect, i.e. the engine. I think naysayers would have a better angle at invalidating the evidence for lack of coherence than they do with mentioning those aspects that I find significant and relevant with regards to the plausability of his story. And I'd wager sceptics to "sniff out" such little inconsistencies or lack of detail much quicker than when being presented with a wholesome account that can stand on its own.
It would be interesting whether children who describe lives in ancient times have any idea they are living many centuries later, or will think they are in a different place, a different world, or what they make of everything being so vastly different. People who died 16 months ago will barely see any difference, people who died 50 years ago at least have some concept of technological development from something similar, but centuries or even millennia ago, neither of those are a given.
There is no life after death. Near death and out of body experiences is just the brain going haywire and hallucinating when it is nearly dead as there is NOT enough oxygen getting to the brain when it is shutting down. Hours later if they are NOT revived their soul will no longer function and will go kaput. When you see a dead person (a corpse) their soul is still there with their dead body but it is no longer functioning. NDEs and OBEs is sort of just a last gasp before the soul burns out. However, if the concept of an eternally inflating multiverse is correct then sooner or later an exact remake of your soul would be created from scratch in some future universe somewhere else in the eternally inflating multiverse. Cosmic inflation is where our universe expanded so rapid for a very brief moment of time at the big bang. Inflation only ended in our part of space (our bubble universe) while other regions are still inflating. Once inflation starts, it never ends, producing an infinite number of bubble universes and each bubble universe would have their own big bang event. There are new universes being created all of the time at an ever increasing rate with new big bangs occurring forever. With an infinite number of big bangs repetitions of everything are inevitable. Your exact life you have lived so far and every other possible variation of your life is being lived right now by other exact copies of you living on exact copies of this Earth in other exact copies of our universe. An exact copy of you is NOT you because it has no link of being you. It's a person that has an exact copy of your soul (not your soul), has an exact copy of your consciousness (not your consciousness) and it has an exact copy of your brain (not your brain), absolutely no information is transferred other between copies, there is no intersection between copies, they are created from scratch (not the current you being recycled) they exist independently from you and they will think that they are you. Sorry, lights out and game over when you die. Life after death impossible by Sean Carroll here ua-cam.com/video/jUIjDncKZbM/v-deo.html and is our universe part of a multiverse? by Delia Perlov here ua-cam.com/video/6eaBPc_fLVs/v-deo.html ......
29:47 A young boy died when hunting w/ friends. 1 of the friends accidentally discharged his weapon thus killing his friend. In a rebirth he came back & attempted 2 strangle his assailant. lol. I would certainly like 2 hear more details of that case.
There is no life after death. Near death and out of body experiences is just the brain going haywire and hallucinating when it is nearly dead as there is NOT enough oxygen getting to the brain when it is shutting down. Hours later if they are NOT revived their soul will no longer function and will go kaput. When you see a dead person (a corpse) their soul is still there with their dead body but it is no longer functioning. NDEs and OBEs is sort of just a last gasp before the soul burns out. However, if the concept of an eternally inflating multiverse is correct then sooner or later an exact remake of your soul would be created from scratch in some future universe somewhere else in the eternally inflating multiverse. Cosmic inflation is where our universe expanded so rapid for a very brief moment of time at the big bang. Inflation only ended in our part of space (our bubble universe) while other regions are still inflating. Once inflation starts, it never ends, producing an infinite number of bubble universes and each bubble universe would have their own big bang event. There are new universes being created all of the time at an ever increasing rate with new big bangs occurring forever. With an infinite number of big bangs repetitions of everything are inevitable. Your exact life you have lived so far and every other possible variation of your life is being lived right now by other exact copies of you living on exact copies of this Earth in other exact copies of our universe. An exact copy of you is NOT you because it has no link of being you. It's a person that has an exact copy of your soul (not your soul), has an exact copy of your consciousness (not your consciousness) and it has an exact copy of your brain (not your brain), absolutely no information is transferred other between copies, there is no intersection between copies, they are created from scratch (not the current you being recycled) they exist independently from you and they will think that they are you. Sorry, lights out and game over when you die. Life after death impossible by Sean Carroll here ua-cam.com/video/jUIjDncKZbM/v-deo.html and is our universe part of a multiverse? by Delia Perlov here ua-cam.com/video/6eaBPc_fLVs/v-deo.html ......
Of course, if you die a violent death then you're much more likely to recall that death. Ask yourself - If you had an uneventful month and someone asks you, "what's new"? You have to answer with, "well, nothing much! It's been an uneventful period of time.". Suppose now that you died during this same sort of interval ... an "uneventful" interval while you were at rest or asleep. I wonder if you'd be likely to recall that death? Probably not. It stands to reason that those who die tragically will remember while those who die at rest or in peace ... probably won't remember.
@james palmer ... Oh, right! Would you like to try again to make a logical argument against reincarnation? You didn't do a very good job the first time around.
@james palmer there is nothing that you could possibly provide that would sway my thoughts on reincarnation. Remember, at one time, there was no bacteria or virus simply because they could not be seen. Physicians were laughed at in the 19th century for suggesting that handwashing was a good idea before initiating surgery. Additionally, reincarnation was an inclusive part of both Christianity and Jewish doctrine prior to the council of Nicea. If you don't agree with the subject matter here, then leave. You won't convince anyone to believe otherwise.
@james palmeryou really need to do some self-evaluation and ask yourself why you're so hostile. If you think reincarnation doesn't exist, blast back to the 19th century where you belong ... when they were quite sure that bacteria didn't exist because they could not see it. Keep your opinions to yourself, and quit the page. You won't sway anyone else's thoughts on the matter.
Thanks so much for your interest. Actually, we are based in Philadelphia, but for the fall we most probably will do a Zoom program. If you are interested in being on our mailing list, please let us know. Write to us at yrs@yogaresearchsociety.com. With best wishes, YRS
Your soul will still be there with your body but it will no longer function when you die and it will go kaput. Near death and out of body experiences is just the brain going haywire and hallucinating when it is nearly dead as there is NOT enough oxygen getting to the brain when it is shutting down. However if the concept of an eternally inflating multiverse is correct then sooner or later an exact remake of your soul will be created from scratch somewhere else in some future universe with it's own separate big bang .When you see a dead person there soul is still in their body but their soul is no longer functioning. Eternal inflation says there are new big bangs happening all of the time at an ever increasing rate forever. Cosmic inflation is where our universe expanded so rapidly for a very brief moment of time at the big bang. Inflation only ended in our part of space (our bubble universe) while other regions of space are still inflating. With an infinite number of big bangs (universes being produced) repetitions of everything are inevitable. Your exact life you have lived so far and every other possible variation of your life is also being lived right now by other exact copies of you in other universes in the eternally inflating multiverse. An exact copy of you would have an exact copy of your brain, an exact copy of your soul and an exact copy of your consciousness. Sorry, it's lights out and game over when you die so you should make the most of your life as this life is your only chance.
Extraordinary theory requires Extraordinary evidence and id suggest the evidence for nde meets that requirement easily it's so far beyond any reasonable doubt.
@@utubetruthteller I never said physical evidence. You invented that. Anyway, there is evidence of love and hate and they aren't physical so what are you on about?
@@goodyear1954 my friend your perception of reality is gross one but there are some people who perception of reality is so subtle, so keep your mind open, this is experience based evidence, dont be arrogant to brush aside many giants of mankind who experienced that reality and strive to follow their path
do these children or families receive monetary compensation for there stories? i ask this because some of the wisest gurus come from that part of the world and also some of the biggest scammers !
Your soul will still be there with your body but it will no longer function when you die and it will go kaput. Near death and out of body experiences is just the brain going haywire and hallucinating when it is nearly dead as there is NOT enough oxygen getting to the brain when it is shutting down. However if the concept of an eternally inflating multiverse is correct then sooner or later an exact remake of your soul will be created from scratch somewhere else in some future universe with it's own separate big bang .When you see a dead person there soul is still in their body but their soul is no longer functioning. Eternal inflation says there are new big bangs happening all of the time at an ever increasing rate forever. Cosmic inflation is where our universe expanded so rapidly for a very brief moment of time at the big bang. Inflation only ended in our part of space (our bubble universe) while other regions of space are still inflating. With an infinite number of big bangs (universes being produced) repetitions of everything are inevitable. Your exact life you have lived so far and every other possible variation of your life is also being lived right now by other exact copies of you in other universes in the eternally inflating multiverse. An exact copy of you would have an exact copy of your brain, an exact copy of your soul and an exact copy of your consciousness. Sorry, it's lights out and game over when you die so you should make the most of your life as this life is your only chance.
He so many interesting things, with so many things to explore and in the first question, comes a person with some self involved personal story about how she had a birth mark...they must exausted of these kind of ppl, also this is the first video where in the comments ppl are talking about the cases not them selves! Thank you for sharing!
About the James Leininger case: There is another piece of specific information that I think merits an extra mention: Prof. Tucker says in the presentation that James flew a Corsair. And his engine had caught fire from oncoming flak. Now in my research when preparing for an interview with Prof. Tucker he kindly let us do, I happened upon a paragraph that talked about this particular type of plane and made a point that the surest way for an enemy to take it down was to fire into the engine located right at the tip of the "nose", which would pretty much always ignite fire, thus leading to the engine giving out and eventually stopping the front mounted propeller, effectively rendering the plane unmaneuverable. How could have young James possibly had such a piece of information that is most likely not known outside of circles of WWII air combat "buffs"? I think it adds to the specificity of the case underlining Prof. Tuckers and Dr. Stevenson's system of finding 200 variables, where the details the children mention either score high in number of accuracy or in regards to being very specific or both. And that - to me anyway - is very much the case here with young James at ages a hair shy of 2 years until later in his toddler years. I just added this to show that that system they've come up with to assess cases by sounds very plausible and dependable to my ears. (Just saying, as the expression goes)
There is no life after death. Near death and out of body experiences is just the brain going haywire and hallucinating when it is nearly dead as there is NOT enough oxygen getting to the brain when it is shutting down. Hours later if they are NOT revived their soul will no longer function and will go kaput. When you see a dead person (a corpse) their soul is still there with their dead body but it is no longer functioning. NDEs and OBEs is sort of just a last gasp before the soul burns out. However, if the concept of an eternally inflating multiverse is correct then sooner or later an exact remake of your soul would be created from scratch in some future universe somewhere else in the eternally inflating multiverse. Cosmic inflation is where our universe expanded so rapid for a very brief moment of time at the big bang. Inflation only ended in our part of space (our bubble universe) while other regions are still inflating. Once inflation starts, it never ends, producing an infinite number of bubble universes and each bubble universe would have their own big bang event. There are new universes being created all of the time at an ever increasing rate with new big bangs occurring forever. With an infinite number of big bangs repetitions of everything are inevitable. Your exact life you have lived so far and every other possible variation of your life is being lived right now by other exact copies of you living on exact copies of this Earth in other exact copies of our universe. An exact copy of you is NOT you because it has no link of being you. It's a person that has an exact copy of your soul (not your soul), has an exact copy of your consciousness (not your consciousness) and it has an exact copy of your brain (not your brain), absolutely no information is transferred other between copies, there is no intersection between copies, they are created from scratch (not the current you being recycled) they exist independently from you and they will think that they are you. Sorry, lights out and game over when you die. Life after death impossible by Sean Carroll here ua-cam.com/video/jUIjDncKZbM/v-deo.html and is our universe part of a multiverse? by Delia Perlov here ua-cam.com/video/6eaBPc_fLVs/v-deo.html ......
James did not fly a Corsair when he was killed. He flew an M2. He was a test pilot for the Corsair only.
OK. @@bdm1000 But that was not exactly the point here. The point was that he knew about the specific vulnerability of these and other models where the easiest and most efficient way to down them was by firing onto the engine head on. _That_ what I meant to say in the addendum and how it appears unlikely he could have known that at this young age at pre internet, pre smartphone times and with information he could have at best obtained in books , libraries or maybe from the tales of adults he had overheard. Other than that, there was literally no way for him to know something this specific. That's the point here. I find the specification of type of fighter plane a little less relevant given the context. Interesting, but not the most relevant.
@@wesboundmusic But it is an important point that I am making, and you are still wrong about what you said. Let me preface this by saying I am on your side. I am a believer, but I'm also trying to help you defend James story against the naysayers. You can't do that if you mix up the facts.
You said, "The point was that he knew about the specific vulnerability of these and other models where the easiest and most efficient way to down them was by firing onto the engine head on."
No, that is incorrect. I know of no evidence James ever mentioned ANYTHING about the most efficient way to take down a plane especially the part about "firing onto the engine head on". As far as I know, James never said any such thing.
He said things like, “That’s a Corsair. They used to get flat tires all the time! And they always wanted to turn left when they took off!”. Then his father Bruce would do research and fill in other information, but not this, nor can the details he later learned be attributed to James.
They also said things like James had the "ability to distinguish between a Corsair and an Avenger." He knew the difference between a Tony and a Zero, what a drop tank was and things like that, but you need to make sure of your claims because even if you are on the right side of things you only make the naysayer's case for him or her when you get the facts wrong.
Regarding the FM-2 Wildcat (the plane James Huston was shot down in), an example of his knowledge was when he mentioned an antenna on the plane that often got in the pilots way. His father Bruce had a model of an FM-2 that had no such antenna, but when he researched it he found out James was right. He also demonstrated he knew how to put his helmet on and go through the communication and other preparatory steps preparing for flight, but he never talked about how to take a plane down.
The only thing that James said along those lines (about the engine of a plane taking down a plane) was when he said, "Mama, before I was born, I was a pilot, and my airplane got shot in the engine and it crashed in the water, and that's how I died." This is important because the eyewitness reports they later found confirmed his FM-2 Wildcat was indeed hit head on directly in the engine.
@@bdm1000 OK, I see where you're coming from and I think I understand. See, I referenced what I remember at the time of commenting and this was at least a year after I had conducted the interview and longer, if you added the amount of time of researching and preparing for it. Then I had to move on and in a matter of four weeks recap the history of nearly 100 years of Quantum Physics for the upcoming interview. So I hope I can be forgiven for not remembering the exact phrasing one year after doing the research and then needing to move on to the next thing not giving it all of my attention anymore after that.
See, you say he, James, never said anything verbatim on the engine being the most vulnerable part in terms of fitness for combat. OK, not in so many words, correct. However, to me, the mere fact that he _mentions_ the engine getting hit by enemy fire as cause for the plane going down and him dying in the crash is the very thing that tells me that he had known about this detail like all the others you accurately reference. If it had not been known to him or if it had not been an important detail, he might have said something like 'my airplane got shot' without specifically mentioning the engine. In that way, his account would have sounded much closer to fabrication than if he added this particular aspect, i.e. the engine.
I think naysayers would have a better angle at invalidating the evidence for lack of coherence than they do with mentioning those aspects that I find significant and relevant with regards to the plausability of his story. And I'd wager sceptics to "sniff out" such little inconsistencies or lack of detail much quicker than when being presented with a wholesome account that can stand on its own.
It would be interesting whether children who describe lives in ancient times have any idea they are living many centuries later, or will think they are in a different place, a different world, or what they make of everything being so vastly different. People who died 16 months ago will barely see any difference, people who died 50 years ago at least have some concept of technological development from something similar, but centuries or even millennia ago, neither of those are a given.
There is no life after death. Near death and out of body experiences is just the brain going haywire and hallucinating when it is nearly dead as there is NOT enough oxygen getting to the brain when it is shutting down. Hours later if they are NOT revived their soul will no longer function and will go kaput. When you see a dead person (a corpse) their soul is still there with their dead body but it is no longer functioning. NDEs and OBEs is sort of just a last gasp before the soul burns out. However, if the concept of an eternally inflating multiverse is correct then sooner or later an exact remake of your soul would be created from scratch in some future universe somewhere else in the eternally inflating multiverse. Cosmic inflation is where our universe expanded so rapid for a very brief moment of time at the big bang. Inflation only ended in our part of space (our bubble universe) while other regions are still inflating. Once inflation starts, it never ends, producing an infinite number of bubble universes and each bubble universe would have their own big bang event. There are new universes being created all of the time at an ever increasing rate with new big bangs occurring forever. With an infinite number of big bangs repetitions of everything are inevitable. Your exact life you have lived so far and every other possible variation of your life is being lived right now by other exact copies of you living on exact copies of this Earth in other exact copies of our universe. An exact copy of you is NOT you because it has no link of being you. It's a person that has an exact copy of your soul (not your soul), has an exact copy of your consciousness (not your consciousness) and it has an exact copy of your brain (not your brain), absolutely no information is transferred other between copies, there is no intersection between copies, they are created from scratch (not the current you being recycled) they exist independently from you and they will think that they are you. Sorry, lights out and game over when you die. Life after death impossible by Sean Carroll here ua-cam.com/video/jUIjDncKZbM/v-deo.html and is our universe part of a multiverse? by Delia Perlov here ua-cam.com/video/6eaBPc_fLVs/v-deo.html ......
29:47 A young boy died when hunting w/ friends. 1 of the friends accidentally discharged his weapon thus killing his friend. In a rebirth he came back & attempted 2 strangle his assailant. lol. I would certainly like 2 hear more details of that case.
Read his books.
To hear not 2 hear
As I remember James wasn’t flying a Corsair when he crashed. I believe he had transitioned to a different plane.
There is no life after death. Near death and out of body experiences is just the brain going haywire and hallucinating when it is nearly dead as there is NOT enough oxygen getting to the brain when it is shutting down. Hours later if they are NOT revived their soul will no longer function and will go kaput. When you see a dead person (a corpse) their soul is still there with their dead body but it is no longer functioning. NDEs and OBEs is sort of just a last gasp before the soul burns out. However, if the concept of an eternally inflating multiverse is correct then sooner or later an exact remake of your soul would be created from scratch in some future universe somewhere else in the eternally inflating multiverse. Cosmic inflation is where our universe expanded so rapid for a very brief moment of time at the big bang. Inflation only ended in our part of space (our bubble universe) while other regions are still inflating. Once inflation starts, it never ends, producing an infinite number of bubble universes and each bubble universe would have their own big bang event. There are new universes being created all of the time at an ever increasing rate with new big bangs occurring forever. With an infinite number of big bangs repetitions of everything are inevitable. Your exact life you have lived so far and every other possible variation of your life is being lived right now by other exact copies of you living on exact copies of this Earth in other exact copies of our universe. An exact copy of you is NOT you because it has no link of being you. It's a person that has an exact copy of your soul (not your soul), has an exact copy of your consciousness (not your consciousness) and it has an exact copy of your brain (not your brain), absolutely no information is transferred other between copies, there is no intersection between copies, they are created from scratch (not the current you being recycled) they exist independently from you and they will think that they are you. Sorry, lights out and game over when you die. Life after death impossible by Sean Carroll here ua-cam.com/video/jUIjDncKZbM/v-deo.html and is our universe part of a multiverse? by Delia Perlov here ua-cam.com/video/6eaBPc_fLVs/v-deo.html ......
Yes, and FM-2
Of course, if you die a violent death then you're much more likely to recall that death. Ask yourself - If you had an uneventful month and someone asks you, "what's new"? You have to answer with, "well, nothing much! It's been an uneventful period of time.". Suppose now that you died during this same sort of interval ... an "uneventful" interval while you were at rest or asleep. I wonder if you'd be likely to recall that death? Probably not. It stands to reason that those who die tragically will remember while those who die at rest or in peace ... probably won't remember.
@james palmer ... Oh, right! Would you like to try again to make a logical argument against reincarnation? You didn't do a very good job the first time around.
@james palmer ... try again, Jimmy.
@james palmer there is nothing that you could possibly provide that would sway my thoughts on reincarnation. Remember, at one time, there was no bacteria or virus simply because they could not be seen. Physicians were laughed at in the 19th century for suggesting that handwashing was a good idea before initiating surgery. Additionally, reincarnation was an inclusive part of both Christianity and Jewish doctrine prior to the council of Nicea. If you don't agree with the subject matter here, then leave. You won't convince anyone to believe otherwise.
@james palmer Great. Then you go ahead and see it as impossible. That's a good little man.
@james palmeryou really need to do some self-evaluation and ask yourself why you're so hostile. If you think reincarnation doesn't exist, blast back to the 19th century where you belong ... when they were quite sure that bacteria didn't exist because they could not see it. Keep your opinions to yourself, and quit the page. You won't sway anyone else's thoughts on the matter.
Any chance you'll be hosting or can host any events in the Colorado Springs/Denver area? I'd love to attend one
Thanks so much for your interest. Actually, we are based in Philadelphia, but for the fall we most probably will do a Zoom program. If you are interested in being on our mailing list, please let us know. Write to us at yrs@yogaresearchsociety.com. With best wishes, YRS
Your soul will still be there with your body but it will no longer function when you die and it will go kaput. Near death and out of body experiences is just the brain going haywire and hallucinating when it is nearly dead as there is NOT enough oxygen getting to the brain when it is shutting down. However if the concept of an eternally inflating multiverse is correct then sooner or later an exact remake of your soul will be created from scratch somewhere else in some future universe with it's own separate big bang .When you see a dead person there soul is still in their body but their soul is no longer functioning. Eternal inflation says there are new big bangs happening all of the time at an ever increasing rate forever. Cosmic inflation is where our universe expanded so rapidly for a very brief moment of time at the big bang. Inflation only ended in our part of space (our bubble universe) while other regions of space are still inflating. With an infinite number of big bangs (universes being produced) repetitions of everything are inevitable. Your exact life you have lived so far and every other possible variation of your life is also being lived right now by other exact copies of you in other universes in the eternally inflating multiverse. An exact copy of you would have an exact copy of your brain, an exact copy of your soul and an exact copy of your consciousness. Sorry, it's lights out and game over when you die so you should make the most of your life as this life is your only chance.
Hear say
Extraordinary theory requires Extraordinary evidence and id suggest the evidence for nde meets that requirement easily it's so far beyond any reasonable doubt.
This video isn't about NDEs. It's about children with memories of a past life.
Rudolph Steiner's Karma and Reincarnation would be something you might enjoy.
No hard evidence for life before life or life after death! These are stories at best !
Ok Einstein you are very intelligent 😆 🤣 😂 😹
@@utubetruthteller why don't you direct us to some evidence instead of going straight to insults?
@@goodyear1954 you are asking for physical evidence for something which is non physical, so that sounded quite amusing to me 😆 🤣
@@utubetruthteller I never said physical evidence. You invented that. Anyway, there is evidence of love and hate and they aren't physical so what are you on about?
@@goodyear1954 my friend your perception of reality is gross one but there are some people who perception of reality is so subtle, so keep your mind open, this is experience based evidence, dont be arrogant to brush aside many giants of mankind who experienced that reality and strive to follow their path
do these children or families receive monetary compensation for there stories? i ask this because some of the wisest gurus come from that part of the world and also some of the biggest scammers !
Your soul will still be there with your body but it will no longer function when you die and it will go kaput. Near death and out of body experiences is just the brain going haywire and hallucinating when it is nearly dead as there is NOT enough oxygen getting to the brain when it is shutting down. However if the concept of an eternally inflating multiverse is correct then sooner or later an exact remake of your soul will be created from scratch somewhere else in some future universe with it's own separate big bang .When you see a dead person there soul is still in their body but their soul is no longer functioning. Eternal inflation says there are new big bangs happening all of the time at an ever increasing rate forever. Cosmic inflation is where our universe expanded so rapidly for a very brief moment of time at the big bang. Inflation only ended in our part of space (our bubble universe) while other regions of space are still inflating. With an infinite number of big bangs (universes being produced) repetitions of everything are inevitable. Your exact life you have lived so far and every other possible variation of your life is also being lived right now by other exact copies of you in other universes in the eternally inflating multiverse. An exact copy of you would have an exact copy of your brain, an exact copy of your soul and an exact copy of your consciousness. Sorry, it's lights out and game over when you die so you should make the most of your life as this life is your only chance.
They don't receive compensation
This is not scam