Hi, Sorry for that, but I think there is a wrong somewhere. Cell F12 in the sheet Model 1 that represent Significance F is: 4.6710E-6 which actually means: 0.000004671 which is very less than 0.05.
1. MR alone does not mean anything, unless you have solid theoretical framework. 2. On the contrary to what you have said, the p values appear to be less than 0.05.
I am sorry to say this, but this video clip has a lot of inaccuracies. I strongly advise Dr. Debra to revisited the clip and make amendments or take it down.
Hi,
Sorry for that, but I think there is a wrong somewhere.
Cell F12 in the sheet Model 1 that represent Significance F is: 4.6710E-6 which actually means: 0.000004671 which is very less than 0.05.
i caught that too
i was confused too
Thank you for this video. Truly helpful.
Please check the P-values 3:18 You are considering them more than alpha (0.05) which is wrong.
Finally came down to male female
Why is the P-Value in S13 too big? It's ~0.00000126 if I'm seeing it correctly
i think she's talking about the 2.5 in second row p-value
1. MR alone does not mean anything, unless you have solid theoretical framework.
2. On the contrary to what you have said, the p values appear to be less than 0.05.
The entire regression table explanation seems to be incorrect. The p-value explanation is wrong.
can i get the dataset?
I am sorry to say this, but this video clip has a lot of inaccuracies. I strongly advise Dr. Debra to revisited the clip and make amendments or take it down.
Your P values are okay Dr Debra they are all less than 0.05, I think you didn't check the negative exponent
The. p Value is much les then .05
This video is ironic in many ways
Who gave her doctorate?
Even I want to know
Huh? Fsig>.05 ????
oh wow, you should take this video down.