The Crazy Evolution of Propeller Systems Moving World Biggest Ships

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 чер 2024
  • Welcome back to the FLUCTUS channel for a special feature on the fascinating journey of ship propulsion, from the early steam-powered engines to modern technologies, providing valuable insights into the construction process and meticulous assembly of propellers and propulsion units.
    Fluctus is a website and UA-cam channel dedicated to sea geeks. Whenever you are curious or an incorrigible lover of this mysterious world, our videos are made for you !
    We publish 3 videos a week on our UA-cam channel and many more articles on our website.
    Feel free to subscribe to not miss any of our updates and visit our website to discover additional content.
    Don’t forget to follow us on twitter:
    / fluctusofficial
    Please keep the comments section respectful. Any spam, insults or troll will be deleted.
    To contact us, make sure to use our email in the about section of this channel.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 77

  • @rolanddunk5054
    @rolanddunk5054 10 місяців тому +13

    Designing a specific propeller is structured work of art.

  • @LMays-cu2hp
    @LMays-cu2hp 10 місяців тому +6

    Thank you sharing beautiful ships.

  • @garymiller5937
    @garymiller5937 10 місяців тому +7

    I find the whole process very interesting. Thank you very much. 😊😊

  • @nickoutram6939
    @nickoutram6939 9 місяців тому +1

    The scale of this stuff is pretty awe inspiring.

  • @steverudder3321
    @steverudder3321 10 місяців тому +7

    I must admit that I am jealous of those Rudders receiving better care than what I get!😠
    😅😅😅

  • @bradolsen8629
    @bradolsen8629 10 місяців тому +3

    Yes, indeed the video was pretty interesting. Keep them coming. Thank you.

  • @Shipspotting_Vietnam
    @Shipspotting_Vietnam 10 місяців тому +2

    Wonderful!

  • @uchungnguyen7686
    @uchungnguyen7686 10 місяців тому +2

    Tuyệt Vòi lắm Nghe 🎉🎉🎉❤❤❤

  • @freeagent8225
    @freeagent8225 5 місяців тому

    No sailor would ever claim to conquer the seas.

  • @mas_dem
    @mas_dem 7 місяців тому

    Proses produksi kapal yang canggih. Pembuatan baling-baling yang sangat teliti berkualitas

  • @hughsmith7281
    @hughsmith7281 10 місяців тому +1

    Thank you.

  • @user-ns4rm5ox6y
    @user-ns4rm5ox6y 10 місяців тому

    Wow, Best Inovation The Ship Engine From Convensional ( Diessel Fuel ) Proppelers Engine To Electric Propellers ( Non Fuel ) , _ God Bless All, - Thank You, ..... Cheerio.*****.

  • @stevecooper6473
    @stevecooper6473 10 місяців тому +26

    The steam engine was invented, not discovered.

    • @user-co8uy5rb2s
      @user-co8uy5rb2s 10 місяців тому +2

      Was steam discovered or invented?

    • @Guille64
      @Guille64 9 місяців тому

      ​@@user-co8uy5rb2scan you read?

    • @user-co8uy5rb2s
      @user-co8uy5rb2s 9 місяців тому

      can you read sarcasm? 😉

    • @Guille64
      @Guille64 9 місяців тому

      @@user-co8uy5rb2s not in your comment. Would like you to enlighten me, whats your point then?

    • @user-co8uy5rb2s
      @user-co8uy5rb2s 9 місяців тому

      Note that my question was if STEAM was discovered or invented. Of course it was discovered!! Haha

  • @joaoalbertodosanjosgomes1536
    @joaoalbertodosanjosgomes1536 9 місяців тому +1

    Wonderful video.

  • @tracymassie8605
    @tracymassie8605 10 місяців тому

    Very interesting.

  • @JerkerDahlblom
    @JerkerDahlblom 10 місяців тому +5

    Azipod was developed in Finland.

  • @cpcattin
    @cpcattin 10 місяців тому +10

    Nobody “discovered” the steam engine. It was created by creative engineers. Similarly to the Wright Brothers “discovering” the airplane.

    • @badad0166
      @badad0166 10 місяців тому +1

      And don't forget who invented gravity.

    • @kenneth9874
      @kenneth9874 10 місяців тому

      The Wright Brothers didn't "discover" the airplane, they designed and built the first one to fly 😉

    • @badad0166
      @badad0166 10 місяців тому +1

      @@kenneth9874 That's his point. It's a little thing called sarcasm🤠

    • @kenneth9874
      @kenneth9874 10 місяців тому +1

      @@badad0166 I guess even his grammar was sarcastic, similarly?

    • @badad0166
      @badad0166 10 місяців тому +1

      @@kenneth9874 Don't change the subject. The sarcastic commenter was being incorrect on purpose and then you jumped him for being incorrect. That's what I'm teasing you about. C'est ca?

  • @LUVUTV
    @LUVUTV 10 місяців тому +2

    giant propellers for ships

  • @donepearce
    @donepearce 10 місяців тому +4

    The "discovery" of the steam engine? It was an invention - they didn't find one buried under a tree.

    • @billklatsch5058
      @billklatsch5058 10 місяців тому

      This can be debated.
      It was a rediscovery of sorts tho - ancient greeks and later the romans that used "borrowed" greeks to do the heavy maths for them knew of the power of steam and how to put it to use.
      Romans technically had everything to kick off industrialisation - they didnt because slaves where way cheaper...

    • @donepearce
      @donepearce 10 місяців тому +2

      @@billklatsch5058 A recreation of an invention is not a discovery. There are no steam engines in nature. An analogy I like to use is the wheel. The roller is a discovery - someone was pulling something heavy and it got easier when it ran over a round tree limb. But joining a wheel to an axle and mounting it in a bearing was 100% invention. The steam engine is just like this.

  • @davidkolaga8489
    @davidkolaga8489 10 місяців тому +4

    The "discovery" of the steam engine? Did they dig up a fossil engine or find one in the Amazon rain forest or something?

    • @davidkolaga8489
      @davidkolaga8489 10 місяців тому

      I think "development" is the word indicated here

    • @billklatsch5058
      @billklatsch5058 10 місяців тому +1

      Dont tell anyone but a steam engine can run on wood, turf and coal is known about 3k years just not in the west.

  • @JosephDent-qd9ih
    @JosephDent-qd9ih 8 місяців тому +1

    Can the propellers be made from stove eye plate metal?

  • @JosephDent-qd9ih
    @JosephDent-qd9ih 8 місяців тому +1

    What is between the double hull?

  • @Choetaesun
    @Choetaesun 10 місяців тому +2

    6% Fuel saving is possible. It is proved in huge container ships (2 ships). Twice of those 3 %.

  • @toolstechgadgets
    @toolstechgadgets 10 місяців тому +3

    Do you guys film all these videos by yourself or its some stock footage?

    • @brandonadams7837
      @brandonadams7837 10 місяців тому +1

      99% stock they find. They cite the source in most of the clips it’s kind of obvious.

  • @fat_boy647
    @fat_boy647 7 місяців тому

    Propeller made the ship moved not to make it float, just guessing. The question is what makes the ship float...?

  • @glenbirbeck4098
    @glenbirbeck4098 9 місяців тому +1

    The steam engine was discovered? Alien tech left behind? (0:40)

  • @arijarmala2037
    @arijarmala2037 10 місяців тому +1

    Hmm. no mention of azipod at all. How so? I think it is the the latest and best innovation in propulsion.

    • @licencetoswill
      @licencetoswill 9 місяців тому

      half the video is about azipods. The ABB branded units are all azipods.

  • @user-tz9fn9rw4b
    @user-tz9fn9rw4b Місяць тому

    On shaft system from engine room may be diametr of screw make bigger
    and count r\ min of engine .... ?

  • @glennr9913
    @glennr9913 10 місяців тому +6

    What about the Sharrow props that have been the rage in the boating news? I thought they were supposed to enter the cargo shipping industry soon. No mention of them here. I can't imagine an industry that would benefit more from increased prop efficiency than shipping.

    • @MascottDeepfriar
      @MascottDeepfriar 10 місяців тому

      its possible that the efficiency doesn't scale properly to the size for large ships. the complexity and expense of making a sharrow prop at the size required for large shipping vessels might offset any gains they would see. The large ships also see much slower rotation speed so the issues that the sharrow prop addresses may not apply.

    • @brandonadams7837
      @brandonadams7837 10 місяців тому +1

      Sharrow props have to be CNC machined. There is not a CNC machine anywhere on the planet even half the size that can make one. It’d probably cost a few hundred million dollars to make a CNC machine that large. Also props that large have variable pitch and you can’t vary the pitch of a Sharrow prop otherwise you’d see them on the front of prop planes as well.

    • @ova578
      @ova578 10 місяців тому +2

      @@brandonadams7837 most very large props are in fact not VPP. So that is not an issue

    • @mikebrase5161
      @mikebrase5161 4 місяці тому

      ​@@ova578who told you that? I'm curious, I've been working on propellers since '96 and work in the largest drydock in the Western Hemisphere. We are at a point now where it's 50/50 with CPP versus fixed. I just did a set that were 40 foot diameter.

  • @stevercarter5317
    @stevercarter5317 7 місяців тому

    I wouldn’t trust anyone who said that steam engines were discovered.

  • @abdullahazizlahazizchannel830
    @abdullahazizlahazizchannel830 9 місяців тому

    wow amazing ser,,

  • @mrrustygray
    @mrrustygray 10 місяців тому +4

    Voith Schneider Propeller was not addressed at all.

    • @rolanddunk5054
      @rolanddunk5054 10 місяців тому +2

      Voith propulsion units, although they make ships very manoeuvrable,they are not as fuel efficient as a propeller.I served in a Voith tractor tug for 15 years as an engineer,as well as conventional tugs.nearly 32 years in total.

  • @WowIndescribable
    @WowIndescribable 10 місяців тому

    EPS = Expanded Polystyrene

  • @rodneyjweltham150
    @rodneyjweltham150 Місяць тому

    in the same sentence it is A 'STATOR' then it is 'STATTOR'?
    So which is it?

  • @klauspeterkostag
    @klauspeterkostag 9 місяців тому

    If YOU are rich and desinformated, YOU should forget the windpower. A power, only for poor shipowners.

  • @badad0166
    @badad0166 10 місяців тому +1

    More of a "How it is made" for current tech. Besides mentioning da Vinci, not much history. Three points off your score.

  • @somartmana
    @somartmana 10 місяців тому

    der titel in englisch, und ich hätte keine zeit verschwendet.

  • @Frechy69
    @Frechy69 9 місяців тому

    Is it a Stattor or a Stator? @04:07

  • @user-dx6ix1pp3y
    @user-dx6ix1pp3y 9 місяців тому

    Ok

  • @michaljazvinsky1931
    @michaljazvinsky1931 10 місяців тому

    Josef Reseel - scientist first Propeller please studies.

  • @fortuner123
    @fortuner123 10 місяців тому

    Just photos but no tech info.

  • @user-dm3zd2nn5f
    @user-dm3zd2nn5f 10 місяців тому

    프로펠라가 진화해봐자 나에게 오세요 특별한 프로펠라를 가르쳐드릴께요

  • @TRUMP_WAS_RIGHT_ABOUT_EVRYTHNG
    @TRUMP_WAS_RIGHT_ABOUT_EVRYTHNG 10 місяців тому +1

    It could have been a good video but I can't deal with the A. I. Voices. The inflection is so awful😂 up down , kinda up ...then . Flat.
    I am a robot I can't talk

  • @carlolencionicarlo5091
    @carlolencionicarlo5091 10 місяців тому

    Non hanno efficienza :sono obsolete , altro sistema da sostituire...

  • @iwaswrongabouteveryhthing
    @iwaswrongabouteveryhthing 10 місяців тому +2

    these shows are nearly unwatchable,
    feels like a massive commercial

    • @BramBiesiekierski
      @BramBiesiekierski 10 місяців тому

      Yep. The robot is hard to listen to

    • @reynoutdecourt7983
      @reynoutdecourt7983 10 місяців тому +1

      The robot doesn't even know the difference between the words ship and boat. Ship is big. Boat is small.

    • @lenwhatever4187
      @lenwhatever4187 9 місяців тому

      Interesting that the robot pronounces the same word two different ways in two consecutive sentences. I am not sure if the author is just shy or what.

  • @user-pl2ci5kr6n
    @user-pl2ci5kr6n 10 місяців тому

    프로펠러가 진화 한다 개 같은 세상이구만