Is this one of those questions you've always wondered about but never knew the answer to? Me too. This is a re-upload, there was an error in a graphic in old version and YOU DESERVE 100% ACCURACY, FRIENDS
Same here I was like "that's simple, because light just passes through it and no reflection means no visibility" and then I watched the video and I was like :O
Imagine a Ship on the sea, If small waves hit it, it just absorbs them, If a wave with The same size as the ship hits it, it might break. But If the waves are way bigger than the ship, the wave passes under the ship without really getting weaker. Thats an analogy for transparency, where as the wavelengths of the visible light spectrum are Just too big to tingle the glass molecules and therefore pass through it.
its mostly to do with its amorphous state. no crystal structures inside the glass to refract the light. i think.. here ya go ua-cam.com/video/VwRLIt6jgdM/v-deo.html
What do you mean exactly? He explained that the energy levels (of the electrons within the atoms that composes glass) are too far apart for visible light to provide sufficient energy to “bump” electrons to the next level. Therefore, glass is transparent in visible light, and because our eyes detect visible light, glass looks transparent to us.
@@minisn3066 which is a great explanation for how “matter in general” can be transparent. But there’s not an explanation for why the energy levels in amorphous glass are further apart than crystalline sand. They’re made of the same atoms, the jumps seem like they should be the same.
Fun fact: It's nowadays possible to fine tune which frequencies should be let through and which should be blocked. I can't really explain how it works in detail, but I know the following: For example, I wear glasses (not really made of glass, it's some kind of plastic) that have these two (intentionally created) features: * UV filter (always present): It blocks all UV rays as much as possible (since they can harm your eyes, and are useless for human vision anyway). * Blue filter (optional, costs extra): It blocks the highest frequencies of blue/violet light (basically right next to UV on a spectrum), since these are only minimally useful for human vision (since they are at the very edge of the visible frequency range), but they make your eyes go tired faster, since the photons have a lot of energy. And no, it does not filter out all blue light, just the highest frequencies, so everything only has a very slight yellow tint that you get used to very quickly. So both features are made for the same purpose: Let as much useful light through as possible, while blocking as much unnecessary photons as possible, which is good for the eyes and it really works: Since I have glasses with these two features, my eyes get tired much less quickly (which is important for my work, but also for driving in the night). So if you ever get glasses, and are asked if you want to have an UV filter and a blue filter, I can recommend it.
THANK YOU SOOOOO MUCH FOR EVERYTHING YOU AND YOUR SUPPORT SYSTEM DO ON UA-cam. YOU'RE ONE OF MY 100'S OF INSPIRATIONS THAT HELPED ME TO FINALLY CREATE A UA-cam CHANNEL.
I agree, it just misses some more explanations and some better conclusions. For example thou he did scratch molecular orbitals and he didn't go into band theory which is a big part in explaining optical properties.
This is by far the best and most down-to-earth explanation I have ever seen, you put it in a way that even a young child could clearly understand the scientific facts behind how this really works, bravo.
Omg this was so helpful I din't know this was why we aren't transparent and how soil an opaque material became transparent when melted. Thank you so much
There are fish that are pretty close to transparent. You could probably get aliens with similarly transparent bodies, but I think organs, bones or other structural components, etc, would still be pretty distinct as blobs with different degrees of transparency, rather than the alien looking like a glass sculpture. Probably not a route to invisibility, unfortunately.
So glad you're back to making videos frequently. For awhile there I was starting to think you we're going to stop. You are one of my favorite science shows.
Love this video, already knew this, but I am so happy that glass is transparent in visible light because we wouldn't have astronomy or microbiology or any field that requires lenses!
Saw this video and thought for a minute why the hell is glass transparent. I wear glasses and they help me to see, my house has windows that keep the heated air out and the cold air out too. So why is, glass invisible. I had a hard time following your discussion but will NEVER take glass for granted again.
2:45 now you know, next time you have to stay under the sun for a long time, you should carry a glass with the size of your body, and put it between you and the sunlight
@@misterfister15 more like "to a certain wavelength" - although there are some exceptions. Black holes certainly aren't transparent at all. Plasma might also be troublesome given the flowing electrons might be free enough to interact with all wavelengths (but no idea if this is true).
Great vid Joe! Here are my doubts: 1. If a non-metal absorbs red light, it looks bluish. We say it reflects blue light. But how does reflection occur at the atomic scale? If the blue light does not have the right frequency to excite the material's electrons, how can the electrons vibrate at just the right frequency to produce blue light as a response to the incoming photons? 2. If a non-metal absorbs all visible photons, it would look black (because we see the complementary colors, the ones which are not absorbed). But metals can absorb every incoming photon because they have a continuous energy band in which electrons can jump freely. Why aren't metals black then? Why doesn't the absorbed photon energy lost as heat in metals as it does in non-metals?
If we don't actually "touch" things, and only get as close as atoms allow, does that mean soft things have atoms that are more spread out, and rough things have atoms that are closer together? If so, is that why soft things are typically more flammable? If so, what about things like flour? Flour is super soft, but I don't think it's very flammable compared to hair. I need a video about soft things! Lol
Flour is actually super flammable, there have been a LOT of fires/explosions where flour is milled. Max Miller of Tasting History has done a video on it recently.
No, something is hard or soft based on many properties. Flour comes from grains, which are packed with carbohydrates. Those in turn are essentially long chains of sugar molecules. What makes flour so soft is that the grains are ground up to form a very fine powder. As a thin powder, the molecules have a lot of surface area - which means a chemical reaction can occur very quickly, because you can burn up a whole lot of molecules at the same time, if you can mix the flower with enough oxygen. Flour feels soft, because flour contains so much air, you push the mass of flower apart easily. Its just not connected to each other. In this case it has more to do with the structure of the compound, than molecular connections. As for what makes other objects soft, its the flex in the structure. Glass is 'spacious' in its molecular structure, but still very hard. A Buckminsterfullerene (basically a sockerball of carbon atoms) is also spacious and its very rigid. However, there are plastics that feel much softer, because the chains of plastic molecules can slide and move within the structure. That gives some plastics their flex.
Mindblown. While I knew about this on a..."surface" level, I love knowing how things actually work, and knowing exactly how light, molecules, pressure and all that actually work and interact is amazing! Thank you for the science, Joe. Keep up the great work ^_^
From what I remember, the silica molecules in glass are spread far apart enough that light can easily move in between and pass through. This is why you can see right through glass. Also the molecules are stuck in place really well so that its always transparent. pretty neat eh
I'm a 6th grader and was very confused by the same thing, needless to say this 8 minute youtube video explained this much better than my pass 4 years of schooling, asking the same question.
Many people seem to think "atoms never touch" which is untrue, the concepts that we're used to in the macroscopic world break down once you get to the microscopic world of atoms and subatomic particles, concepts like "touch", so you can't define "touch" like the traditional "touch" as in if 2 things are in contact with each other they're touching. because subatomic particles are just basically disturbances in a field, how can 2 disturbances be in contact with each other? You need a different definition of touch at these microscopic scales, so by these definitions, atoms do indeed touch each other.
Awesome video like always! A question, if we can never really touch anything since the electrons repels each other, how do things such paint, powders or even corona virus can stick to our hands?
The repulsion between electron can be overpowered by adhesive forces of paints and powders, and maybe coronavirus uses some sticky substance which also have adhedive or some other forms of attractive force, which are large enough to overpower Electrostatics repulsion. This can be demonstrated by using same fingers coated with some adhesive.
When I worked in a foundry many years ago, I was amazed to see the shadows of people through yellow-hot sheets of steel. I think pretty much anything can be transparent under the right conditions.
Interesting. Do you suppose that people make better reflectors? I'm imagining that the heat coming off the sheet reflects off the person, coming back through the sheet, thus reinforcing the light output on Your side of the sheet.
Foundry work attracts all sorts, one I worked with used to throw scraps of paper with peoples names on into the oven, he swore he could see people inside.
Start with 2 identically clear glass masses. One surface is polished and remains transparently "clear", while the other surface is ground to a matte finish and becomes "opaquely translucent". The internal structures remain identically transparent. If transparency is purely an electron /energy absorption thing, why is there a difference in transparency between these 2 identically structured atomic masses?
One part of the photon absorption I've never been clear on : How close to "just the right amount" of energy in a photon does the difference between the energy potentials have to be for the photon to be absorbed. The way it's described here as well as other places, it's made to sound like it is EXACT (in the same way that every photon of a particular wavelength has exactly the same energy). However, the likelyhood that a photon has EXACTLY the right amount of energy, to within a billionth of a billionth of a billionth of a percent, is practically 0, as to my knowledge the possible wavelengths of light are not quantized, so there's nothing that would keep photons from occupying the full range of possible wavelengths generated. So clearly there's a little 'fudge room' when it comes to the exact energy that is able to be absorbed, but if that's the case where does the extra energy GO, as the energy cannot be lost? If it were able to be immediately re-emitted as a photon, then it would seem there'd be no reason that the same couldn't happen for all photons that contain at least the minimum amount of energy. This can also be seen in absorption lines, they are thin, but not infinitely so. So where does the 'width' in absorption lines come from? WHere does the extra energy come from/go?
These are some really good questions actually and I can try my best to clear things up from what ive learned from being a chemistry major. Youre definitely right about the fact that there is not one exact amount of energy a photon has to have to move an electron to a higher energy level. But from what ive learned an extremely specific wavelength of light has to hit the atom for an electron to jump to a higher energy level. Im not sure how specific the wavelength has to be but the margin of error is definitely less than a nm. Where does this extra energy go though? I would suggest if the wavelength was on the shorter side of the threshold, slightly more energy, then when the electron returns to a lower energy level it would just release slightly more energy. Very good questions though and now I am curious to look deeper into this also.
I actually just researched this and absorption lines theoretically should be infinitely narrow but the atom can absorb a small range of wavelengths due to the Doppler effect which happens when the atom is in motion, you should definitely read into this its pretty cool.
@@thomorl285 The doppler effect contributes, but it's not nearly enough to explain how broad real absorption lines are. Look up *spectral broadening.* There are many types. Even a sodium vapor lamp has spectral broadening, which is why the two thin emission lines at 589.0 and 589.6 nanometers are not perfectly thin, as they should be. But in solids, you have many atoms and molecules arranged and coupled to many other atoms/molecules. In fact, these would probably be better described by a band structure, rather than the oversimplified Bohr model shown in this video. Absorption lines in real solids are *extremely* broad. They have to be, otherwise pigments wouldn't exist. You could emit colored light through vapor lamps, but if a solid only absorbed a specific amount of energy, then so little light would be absorbed that we wouldn't notice any color change at all! All pigments would be white! What a boring world that would be.
+ @Thomo RL Actually that has to do with 3 things. 1. Photons come in quanta (quantummechanic) which is defined as its frequency * the Planck's constant. So light comes in set stanges of energy. 2. How much wiggle room within absorption lines there is, is based on the amount of surrounding atoms. No electron can have the exact same state as the other electrons in the molecule (dunno why, thats just how it works). The exact state also changes on the surrounding bonds inside a molecule. Imagine a complex protein molecule - electrons at the center have slightly different states than those on the outsides. You can imagine that the absorbtion bands for a complex protein are actually very complex and wide - sometimes overlapping, that it aborbs most light and isnt transparent for a lot of frequencies of light. This is also why a cold gass has narrower bands - but a hotter gass has wider bands, because collisions between molecules (which increases with heat) slightly change the state of colliding electrons. This widens the spectrum bands - and then I'm ignoring the dolper effect in this story - this widens the band a little more. 3. A photon doesnt need to be exactly the right energy level. It can also be higher - but never be lower. If the energy is higher than the energy that binds the electron to the nucleus, the electron escapes and the atom becomes an ion (charged particle). This is the photoelectric effect, a piece of research that Einstein got his Nobel prize for. The electron absorbs enough energy to escape, and the remaining energy gets transfered into speed. If there is more than enough energy to jump to the next energy state, but not enough to let the electron to escape - the event does not occur - the photon passes through and the material is mostly transparent for this frequency of light. As photons get higher in energy another effect occurs: This is called the Compton effect. The photon encounters a electron. The electron absorbs enough energy to escape the atom. However there is so much energy left in the photon, it changes direction and continues as a lower energy photon. The angle + the loss of frequency = the amount of energy absorbed by the electron. This effect only occurs well above the binding energy of electrons to the nucleus. You are dealing with x rays at this level. The change of angle is called the scattering of photons - resulting angles of 0-60 degrees (so it fans out behind the scattering object) are common - but there is also a common reflection (angles between 160-180 degrees) for x rays to reflect back towards their source. So you would be safest, standing next to the person getting x rayed - not next to the x ray source. This ionization is a real problem. It's minimum level occurs at UV light from the sun. It can ionize atoms in your cells and lead to all kinds of damage. If that damage occurs on your DNA, you may develop cancer later on. You body's immediate response to the damage is called a sunburn. Okay, class is done - go celebrate xmas!
Transparency used to fascinate the hell out of me as a small kid. Always wondered about windows. And those clear Bic pens... I used to collect them because I thought they were treasure, lol. Pretty sure I grew out of that by the time I was 5 or 6 though.
Rough xD. My familly is dutch or italian or something, and it came to live in northeast Brazil. Once I sat my arm in the midday sun for literally 5 minutes at the bus. When I looked back it was almost burning like a barbecue.
Glass is a unique material with a wide range of applications in various industries due to its amorphous solid state, which is an intermediate state between liquid and solid. This property makes it neither a liquid nor a solid, but rather an amorphous solid. ❤
Glass is not fully opaque to ultraviolet light. It just reflects some of the uv. This can and does affect things like furniture and clothing that's left in or near windows for long periods of time. Cloth items left in windows for a long time do fade from ultraviolet exposure. That's why if you have something like a cloth covered couch by the window for a number of years, the side facing toward the window will be a lighter color afterward. Stores that keep clothing in the window for long enough also have to either discount or throw away the window display clothing if it has been there for enough time, because the side of the clothing that faces towards the window will have faded. This is also why a lot of truck drivers have prematurely aged skin on the arm that is closest to their window. There isn't enough ultraviolet coming through the truck windows to give them a burn, but spending enough time behind the wheel causes them to absorb enough UV that their skin on that side ages faster.
He said low energy ways can pass through things because don't have enough energy to be absorbed, but later said low energy visible light can't pass through him, but high energy xrays can. These seem contradictory.
I already conceptually and kinda mathematically understood how electrons and their interactions with light and such lead to larger phenomenon but its nice to hear a short n sweet conceptual overview to jog my memory lucky me you're not going hard and fast in to the math of qft as a conceptual basis for electron interactions thank God.
I do have smart friends but they don't like talking about subjects because they only correlate studying to good grades, nothing else besides that xD. It's a real shame.
I once watched a documentary where a teenage boy could TRANSFORM the structure of his molecular arrangement and atoms and take up different forms, some of them even invisible to naked human eyes. It was posssible due to a device that mutated his bodily structure at atomic level. The scientist however wasn't given the recognition he deserved and Nobel prize was unjustly given to other less deserving scientists. Poor Azmuth.
ikr? i had opened the video on chrome, went to sleep, wake up and continued and halfway through the video said "unavailable" lol here's the original link ua-cam.com/video/sUmsQTmXGFg/v-deo.html
I don't think it's exactly accurate to say that repulsion between electrons is what causes the force that stops atoms from going through each other. For neutral atoms, the summed repulsion between electron clouds and between nuclei is not as strong as the attraction between the nucleus of one atom and electrons of the other because of the way that atoms rearrange themselves when they get near each other. (That's why covalent bonds exist.) It's electron degeneracy pressure, which has more to do with the Pauli Exclusion Principle, that overcomes the net electromagnetic ATTRACTION. It's also important that matter sticks together and isn't destroyed by this electron degeneracy pressure, though, and that sticking together is pretty much entirely due to electromagnetic effects. The fact that electron degeneracy pressure, not electromagnetic repulsion, is what keeps matter "stable" (so objects don't all collapse to ridiculous densities or even black holes) was demonstrated theoretically by Freeman Dyson in 1967.
Is this one of those questions you've always wondered about but never knew the answer to? Me too.
This is a re-upload, there was an error in a graphic in old version and YOU DESERVE 100% ACCURACY, FRIENDS
yes
This is a question that I never knew I wanted to know the answer to haha
Thank you! YES
you're welcome
4:10 OH NO
My initial thought
"well that's obvious, it's becau... Wait why is transparency a thing?"
Same here I was like "that's simple, because light just passes through it and no reflection means no visibility" and then I watched the video and I was like :O
Imagine a Ship on the sea, If small waves hit it, it just absorbs them, If a wave with The same size as the ship hits it, it might break. But If the waves are way bigger than the ship, the wave passes under the ship without really getting weaker.
Thats an analogy for transparency,
where as the wavelengths of the visible light spectrum are Just too big to tingle the glass molecules and therefore pass through it.
@Mr. Virtual be precise in your terrible terrible criticism
@Mr. Virtual had us in the first half
He doesn't really explain why, or rather why other things aren't. What's different between the crystal structure of salt and the structure of glass.
"have i made myself clear?"
"clear as glass. in fact, i can see right through you"
Yes indeed!
And I was today years old when I learned that glass is opaque to UV Light.
Normal glass blocks UVB but not UVA.
Ever seen a slight shadow through prescription glasses?
@@smapa1185 That's definitely not from UV.
@@smapa1185 Glass normally makes slight shadows because of reflection.
Not true you can get sunburned through glass
*If Joe was my science teacher, I'm 100 % sure I wouldn't have dropped science.*
This is sooo cool!
I feel like this video explains really well why matter in general can be transparent, and not at all why glass meets those conditions.
Yes, they said it's about the atoms (not the molecular structure) but also sand and glass have the same atoms.
Comment of the year
its mostly to do with its amorphous state. no crystal structures inside the glass to refract the light. i think.. here ya go ua-cam.com/video/VwRLIt6jgdM/v-deo.html
What do you mean exactly? He explained that the energy levels (of the electrons within the atoms that composes glass) are too far apart for visible light to provide sufficient energy to “bump” electrons to the next level. Therefore, glass is transparent in visible light, and because our eyes detect visible light, glass looks transparent to us.
@@minisn3066 which is a great explanation for how “matter in general” can be transparent. But there’s not an explanation for why the energy levels in amorphous glass are further apart than crystalline sand. They’re made of the same atoms, the jumps seem like they should be the same.
I love how you genuinely love understanding the reasons behind physical phenomena! It's so cool.
I’m taking chemistry right now, and it’s really cool seeing how what I learn in school and what I learn from these videos is connected!
I was just thinking the same
Doing numericals of such topics seems boring but this topics are really interesting
@@harishchad. The math isn't all that fun to me either. The theories are really cool though.
Math is fun guys just ask my calc teacher
@@neurofiedyamato8763 I like your pfp
Fun fact: It's nowadays possible to fine tune which frequencies should be let through and which should be blocked. I can't really explain how it works in detail, but I know the following:
For example, I wear glasses (not really made of glass, it's some kind of plastic) that have these two (intentionally created) features:
* UV filter (always present): It blocks all UV rays as much as possible (since they can harm your eyes, and are useless for human vision anyway).
* Blue filter (optional, costs extra): It blocks the highest frequencies of blue/violet light (basically right next to UV on a spectrum), since these are only minimally useful for human vision (since they are at the very edge of the visible frequency range), but they make your eyes go tired faster, since the photons have a lot of energy. And no, it does not filter out all blue light, just the highest frequencies, so everything only has a very slight yellow tint that you get used to very quickly.
So both features are made for the same purpose: Let as much useful light through as possible, while blocking as much unnecessary photons as possible, which is good for the eyes and it really works: Since I have glasses with these two features, my eyes get tired much less quickly (which is important for my work, but also for driving in the night). So if you ever get glasses, and are asked if you want to have an UV filter and a blue filter, I can recommend it.
yes I also have the above mentioned blue block and UV filter in my glasses and I love it
This video is intresting just like all the others
And that's more than ok!
Yeah, your comment is as good as others
@@Aphrodite10 wow thats a good burn if you meant it that way im taking that
@@indominus05 what you meant
@@Aphrodite10 i meant the video is intresting and we can learn from it
The way it is illustrated and how you tried to explain it was incredible! Thank you!!
i was literally asked why we can see through windows for my admissions interview for university lol
And how did that go?
Did you get in?
Damn thats a great question to ask
@@jamess1787 yeah, they gave me an offer but i rejected it (and then got rejected from the universities i actually applied to, which was stressful 😅)
@@poppymcpeake9961 it's okay bro we feel your pain
I can’t stop thinking about his kid(s) who will watch these videos at school for science class and being like: “THATS MY DAD!”
"you can't touch anything" - Michael Stevens
Also Michael:Or is it ??
I tried that defense at my trial for touching a woman's rear end, didn't work. In the court of law, you can touch things.
"You can't touch this" - MC Hammer
in future , we can have special lenses that produces different wavelength of light and then we can see through anything as we wish.....😁😁😁😁😁
It's actually true u just don't touch each other in a microscopic level
THANK YOU SOOOOO MUCH FOR EVERYTHING YOU AND YOUR SUPPORT SYSTEM DO ON UA-cam. YOU'RE ONE OF MY 100'S OF INSPIRATIONS THAT HELPED ME TO FINALLY CREATE A UA-cam CHANNEL.
This video is misleading, in reality we love Joe's puns.
Clearly we (n) do
I agree, it just misses some more explanations and some better conclusions. For example thou he did scratch molecular orbitals and he didn't go into band theory which is a big part in explaining optical properties.
Facts
This is by far the best and most down-to-earth explanation I have ever seen, you put it in a way that even a young child could clearly understand the scientific facts behind how this really works, bravo.
Omg this was so helpful I din't know this was why we aren't transparent and how soil an opaque material became transparent when melted. Thank you so much
"The stuff that makes up stuff doesn't contain much actual stuff"
2020
gotta love this level of science where “spin” and “rotation” are two entirely different things, and are both complicated to explain simply
Could an alien species create their bodies out of molecules that were transparent to human-visible light? :-D
big brain time
No one knows but hey let your imagination go wild
Doubtful
There are fish that are pretty close to transparent. You could probably get aliens with similarly transparent bodies, but I think organs, bones or other structural components, etc, would still be pretty distinct as blobs with different degrees of transparency, rather than the alien looking like a glass sculpture. Probably not a route to invisibility, unfortunately.
@@andrewfleenor7459 No, fortunately, I don't know about you, but I don't want an alien species to be able to be completely invisible.
So glad you're back to making videos frequently. For awhile there I was starting to think you we're going to stop. You are one of my favorite science shows.
It's because of the heck...all answers lie in the heck
Exactly 100 likes
Perfection
aw hecc, here we go again
"Transparent Joe doesn't exist, he can't hurt you"
Transparent Joe: 0:36
in future , we can have special lenses that produces different wavelength of light and then we can see through anything as we wish.....😁😁😁😁😁
Terrifying. 😂
Love this video, already knew this, but I am so happy that glass is transparent in visible light because we wouldn't have astronomy or microbiology or any field that requires lenses!
Saw this video and thought for a minute why the hell is glass transparent. I wear glasses and they help me to see, my house has windows that keep the heated air out and the cold air out too. So why is, glass invisible. I had a hard time following your discussion but will NEVER take glass for granted again.
I come here for the sciency dad puns. I need to make sure my science dad joke game is always sharp for my kids.
Good I have one for you
Never trust atoms they make up everything
@@manjotbali8985 guess he is able to also read two posts above...
@@manjotbali8985I laughed
Easy decision to subscribe to this guy. Great explanations. He understands what he's explaining well, and relays the information so I can too.
Explanation was excellent, as always. Video effects and animation were above and beyond.
Glass washed with washing liquid, then washed with hot water squeaks when it is rubbed on a woolly jumper after the glass has dried.
This video made me remember the classic "you can´t touch anything" from VSAUCE.
This video was a nice little warmup for school. When you see all sorts of complex stuff it can be really nice to go back to the root of things.
2:45 now you know, next time you have to stay under the sun for a long time, you should carry a glass with the size of your body, and put it between you and the sunlight
Or you could carry an opaque cover mounted on a stick (a parasol), or coat your skin with a substance opaque to UV light (sunblock).
When you comb your hair, you're not really combing it, you're just repelling it with the comb's atoms
I was just thinking about this like yesterday. What a coincidence.
this concept of electrons being in different energy levels was just introduced in my class yesterday.. it was a pleasant coincidance for me too
Same here.. when i was cleaning my window glass yesterday.
Mandela Effect
Seeing titles like that is a personal hell for my sleep deprived self, thanks!
in future , we can have special lenses that produces different wavelength of light and then we can see through anything as we wish.....😁😁😁😁😁
I have waited so long for an explanation like this, thanks so much!
Great video. It actually made me want to explore more of the topics you mentioned.
Title: Why is glass transparent?
Video: Why aren't all things transparent?
all things are transparent, just to a certain degree. And it also depends on the material.
@@misterfister15 more like "to a certain wavelength" - although there are some exceptions. Black holes certainly aren't transparent at all. Plasma might also be troublesome given the flowing electrons might be free enough to interact with all wavelengths (but no idea if this is true).
I found this channel at 3 am and
Instantly I subbed.
Great work pal.
2:20 That would make a cool electron shooter game.
JOE electron
honey, that's called real life.
Great vid Joe! Here are my doubts:
1. If a non-metal absorbs red light, it looks bluish. We say it reflects blue light. But how does reflection occur at the atomic scale? If the blue light does not have the right frequency to excite the material's electrons, how can the electrons vibrate at just the right frequency to produce blue light as a response to the incoming photons?
2. If a non-metal absorbs all visible photons, it would look black (because we see the complementary colors, the ones which are not absorbed). But metals can absorb every incoming photon because they have a continuous energy band in which electrons can jump freely. Why aren't metals black then? Why doesn't the absorbed photon energy lost as heat in metals as it does in non-metals?
If we don't actually "touch" things, and only get as close as atoms allow, does that mean soft things have atoms that are more spread out, and rough things have atoms that are closer together? If so, is that why soft things are typically more flammable? If so, what about things like flour? Flour is super soft, but I don't think it's very flammable compared to hair. I need a video about soft things! Lol
Flour is actually super flammable, there have been a LOT of fires/explosions where flour is milled.
Max Miller of Tasting History has done a video on it recently.
@@jinxcrafter didn't know that!! Thank you for clarifying that!
@@Rika5589 To be fair, I didn't know that either till the video on Tasting History posted (that channel is really good & entertaining as well)
No, something is hard or soft based on many properties.
Flour comes from grains, which are packed with carbohydrates. Those in turn are essentially long chains of sugar molecules. What makes flour so soft is that the grains are ground up to form a very fine powder. As a thin powder, the molecules have a lot of surface area - which means a chemical reaction can occur very quickly, because you can burn up a whole lot of molecules at the same time, if you can mix the flower with enough oxygen.
Flour feels soft, because flour contains so much air, you push the mass of flower apart easily. Its just not connected to each other.
In this case it has more to do with the structure of the compound, than molecular connections.
As for what makes other objects soft, its the flex in the structure. Glass is 'spacious' in its molecular structure, but still very hard.
A Buckminsterfullerene (basically a sockerball of carbon atoms) is also spacious and its very rigid.
However, there are plastics that feel much softer, because the chains of plastic molecules can slide and move within the structure. That gives some plastics their flex.
@@HexerPsy Tldr: Flour is very flammable when aerosolised. Things are soft because they are either very flexible/squishy or airy like a sponge.
Mindblown.
While I knew about this on a..."surface" level, I love knowing how things actually work, and knowing exactly how light, molecules, pressure and all that actually work and interact is amazing! Thank you for the science, Joe. Keep up the great work ^_^
From what I remember, the silica molecules in glass are spread far apart enough that light can easily move in between and pass through. This is why you can see right through glass. Also the molecules are stuck in place really well so that its always transparent. pretty neat eh
Pretty much, it is classed as a reflective material meaning light can bounce back than clear, hence the name, *- R E F L E C T I V E-*
What an educational video. Covalent Bonds, Shells, Levels, ... Photons (which you didn't explain at all) pass right through stuff, Awsome work.
My only problem with this content is that it wasn't around when I was a kid.
I had Star Trek back in the '60's. That's almost as good.
Sounds like someone who didn't watch pbs growing up...
@@tiffanymarie9750 This is way better than the magic school bus or reruns of cosmos.
THAT is the absolute best explanation I've ever heard! Thank you very much!
the game of trying to figure out what was wrong in the first upload that warranted a fix and reupload
Many commenters noted that the little diagram of the electro-magnetic spectrum had the longer and shorter wavelengths reversed.
Well
Plenty wrong here too
This video really made the subject much clearer!
Chocolate ice cream is good
but mint chocolate chip is where it's at
Wassup Kim from Korea
You don't deserve ice cream...you're horrible
When he's right, he's right.
I’m following you, I was following you on chippys couch
Mint is the GOAT.
Yknow I was thinking about this just yesterday and now I get an answer to it recommended...
I feel guilty for clicking. I know why but it's just so fascinating !
A lot of this went over my head, but I feel smarter for watching it. :)
'The stuff which makes of stuff, doesn't contains much actually stuff'
I'm a 6th grader and was very confused by the same thing, needless to say this 8 minute youtube video explained this much better than my pass 4 years of schooling, asking the same question.
Let us all take a minute to thank Adam for keeping us all together.
Many people seem to think "atoms never touch" which is untrue, the concepts that we're used to in the macroscopic world break down once you get to the microscopic world of atoms and subatomic particles, concepts like "touch", so you can't define "touch" like the traditional "touch" as in if 2 things are in contact with each other they're touching. because subatomic particles are just basically disturbances in a field, how can 2 disturbances be in contact with each other? You need a different definition of touch at these microscopic scales, so by these definitions, atoms do indeed touch each other.
"The elctrons around a nucleus can't be just anywhere" hehe actually...
Enunciate!
There is a non zero probability of finding the electron anywhere in the universe although it's astronomically low
Basically we can't say where the electron isn't but we can say where it mostly likely is
That makes sense. Thank you
Commenting for the youtube algorithm. Because knowledge should never die and always be shared.
Awesome video like always! A question, if we can never really touch anything since the electrons repels each other, how do things such paint, powders or even corona virus can stick to our hands?
The repulsion between electron can be overpowered by adhesive forces of paints and powders, and maybe coronavirus uses some sticky substance which also have adhedive or some other forms of attractive force, which are large enough to overpower Electrostatics repulsion.
This can be demonstrated by using same fingers coated with some adhesive.
When I worked in a foundry many years ago, I was amazed to see the shadows of people through yellow-hot sheets of steel. I think pretty much anything can be transparent under the right conditions.
Interesting. Do you suppose that people make better reflectors? I'm imagining that the heat coming off the sheet reflects off the person, coming back through the sheet, thus reinforcing the light output on Your side of the sheet.
@@HuFlungDung2 I don't think it matters what the surface is, unless it's one that absorbs light.
Foundry work attracts all sorts, one I worked with used to throw scraps of paper with peoples names on into the oven, he swore he could see people inside.
"Giving examples of glass"
Me: you literally have glasses in front of your eyes
Start with 2 identically clear glass masses. One surface is polished and remains transparently "clear", while the other surface is ground to a matte finish and becomes "opaquely translucent". The internal structures remain identically transparent. If transparency is purely an electron /energy absorption thing, why is there a difference in transparency between these 2 identically structured atomic masses?
One part of the photon absorption I've never been clear on : How close to "just the right amount" of energy in a photon does the difference between the energy potentials have to be for the photon to be absorbed. The way it's described here as well as other places, it's made to sound like it is EXACT (in the same way that every photon of a particular wavelength has exactly the same energy). However, the likelyhood that a photon has EXACTLY the right amount of energy, to within a billionth of a billionth of a billionth of a percent, is practically 0, as to my knowledge the possible wavelengths of light are not quantized, so there's nothing that would keep photons from occupying the full range of possible wavelengths generated.
So clearly there's a little 'fudge room' when it comes to the exact energy that is able to be absorbed, but if that's the case where does the extra energy GO, as the energy cannot be lost? If it were able to be immediately re-emitted as a photon, then it would seem there'd be no reason that the same couldn't happen for all photons that contain at least the minimum amount of energy. This can also be seen in absorption lines, they are thin, but not infinitely so. So where does the 'width' in absorption lines come from? WHere does the extra energy come from/go?
And how far apart can the electron and the photon be?
These are some really good questions actually and I can try my best to clear things up from what ive learned from being a chemistry major. Youre definitely right about the fact that there is not one exact amount of energy a photon has to have to move an electron to a higher energy level. But from what ive learned an extremely specific wavelength of light has to hit the atom for an electron to jump to a higher energy level. Im not sure how specific the wavelength has to be but the margin of error is definitely less than a nm. Where does this extra energy go though? I would suggest if the wavelength was on the shorter side of the threshold, slightly more energy, then when the electron returns to a lower energy level it would just release slightly more energy. Very good questions though and now I am curious to look deeper into this also.
I actually just researched this and absorption lines theoretically should be infinitely narrow but the atom can absorb a small range of wavelengths due to the Doppler effect which happens when the atom is in motion, you should definitely read into this its pretty cool.
@@thomorl285 The doppler effect contributes, but it's not nearly enough to explain how broad real absorption lines are. Look up *spectral broadening.* There are many types. Even a sodium vapor lamp has spectral broadening, which is why the two thin emission lines at 589.0 and 589.6 nanometers are not perfectly thin, as they should be. But in solids, you have many atoms and molecules arranged and coupled to many other atoms/molecules. In fact, these would probably be better described by a band structure, rather than the oversimplified Bohr model shown in this video.
Absorption lines in real solids are *extremely* broad. They have to be, otherwise pigments wouldn't exist. You could emit colored light through vapor lamps, but if a solid only absorbed a specific amount of energy, then so little light would be absorbed that we wouldn't notice any color change at all! All pigments would be white! What a boring world that would be.
+ @Thomo RL Actually that has to do with 3 things.
1. Photons come in quanta (quantummechanic) which is defined as its frequency * the Planck's constant. So light comes in set stanges of energy.
2. How much wiggle room within absorption lines there is, is based on the amount of surrounding atoms. No electron can have the exact same state as the other electrons in the molecule (dunno why, thats just how it works). The exact state also changes on the surrounding bonds inside a molecule. Imagine a complex protein molecule - electrons at the center have slightly different states than those on the outsides. You can imagine that the absorbtion bands for a complex protein are actually very complex and wide - sometimes overlapping, that it aborbs most light and isnt transparent for a lot of frequencies of light.
This is also why a cold gass has narrower bands - but a hotter gass has wider bands, because collisions between molecules (which increases with heat) slightly change the state of colliding electrons.
This widens the spectrum bands - and then I'm ignoring the dolper effect in this story - this widens the band a little more.
3. A photon doesnt need to be exactly the right energy level. It can also be higher - but never be lower. If the energy is higher than the energy that binds the electron to the nucleus, the electron escapes and the atom becomes an ion (charged particle). This is the photoelectric effect, a piece of research that Einstein got his Nobel prize for. The electron absorbs enough energy to escape, and the remaining energy gets transfered into speed.
If there is more than enough energy to jump to the next energy state, but not enough to let the electron to escape - the event does not occur - the photon passes through and the material is mostly transparent for this frequency of light.
As photons get higher in energy another effect occurs: This is called the Compton effect. The photon encounters a electron. The electron absorbs enough energy to escape the atom. However there is so much energy left in the photon, it changes direction and continues as a lower energy photon. The angle + the loss of frequency = the amount of energy absorbed by the electron. This effect only occurs well above the binding energy of electrons to the nucleus. You are dealing with x rays at this level. The change of angle is called the scattering of photons - resulting angles of 0-60 degrees (so it fans out behind the scattering object) are common - but there is also a common reflection (angles between 160-180 degrees) for x rays to reflect back towards their source. So you would be safest, standing next to the person getting x rayed - not next to the x ray source.
This ionization is a real problem. It's minimum level occurs at UV light from the sun. It can ionize atoms in your cells and lead to all kinds of damage. If that damage occurs on your DNA, you may develop cancer later on. You body's immediate response to the damage is called a sunburn.
Okay, class is done - go celebrate xmas!
For gods sake I keep finding good channels that I’m surprised I never seen before
5:25 *"Even in the glass of the screen that's between us right now"* < Glass? You mean the plastic???
Phone screens have used glass for a number of years. Even prior to this video way back in the stone ages of 3 years ago when you posted this.
@@MastaSquidge The screen in between me and him is plastic, still is, because I'm watching on a flat screen.
Really interesting! Wanna hear more about the nature of electrons and how does all that actually work, it's so crazy!
This video it's very interesting as always
This was the best explaination of glass i ever saw!
Your flesh is transparent to x rays but your bones are not. They must be transparent to gamma rays, I imagine.
I wasn't invisible to my gamma.
bruh when Joe was straight up invisible that kinda scared me for a second ngl
This was an incredible video!
D
That
why.
This is so weird I’ve been thinking about this in my car for a week and kept forgetting to google it. Thank you IOTBS.
"Beneath the clothes, we find a man...and beneath the man, we find his...nucleus." -Nacho Libre
Transparency used to fascinate the hell out of me as a small kid. Always wondered about windows. And those clear Bic pens... I used to collect them because I thought they were treasure, lol. Pretty sure I grew out of that by the time I was 5 or 6 though.
And then there’s me... I can get a sunburn inside a house, in the shade and even in winter in rainy Denmark 😅
Rough xD. My familly is dutch or italian or something, and it came to live in northeast Brazil. Once I sat my arm in the midday sun for literally 5 minutes at the bus.
When I looked back it was almost burning like a barbecue.
Because glass only blocks UVB, but not UVA
super information, because I have never thinking about that. Thank You and stay Healthy
I’ve seen this before
Hey I know your channel!
Glass is a unique material with a wide range of applications in various industries due to its amorphous solid state, which is an intermediate state between liquid and solid. This property makes it neither a liquid nor a solid, but rather an amorphous solid. ❤
Me when a joke goes over someone's head: 0:31
the question this brings up is why is glass transparent but sand is not? they both have the same atoms and same electrons?
When he said "booper" I thought he was about to follow it up with "snooter" XD
So close
Glass is not fully opaque to ultraviolet light. It just reflects some of the uv. This can and does affect things like furniture and clothing that's left in or near windows for long periods of time. Cloth items left in windows for a long time do fade from ultraviolet exposure.
That's why if you have something like a cloth covered couch by the window for a number of years, the side facing toward the window will be a lighter color afterward. Stores that keep clothing in the window for long enough also have to either discount or throw away the window display clothing if it has been there for enough time, because the side of the clothing that faces towards the window will have faded.
This is also why a lot of truck drivers have prematurely aged skin on the arm that is closest to their window. There isn't enough ultraviolet coming through the truck windows to give them a burn, but spending enough time behind the wheel causes them to absorb enough UV that their skin on that side ages faster.
Why you uploaded it twice😍???
He said low energy ways can pass through things because don't have enough energy to be absorbed, but later said low energy visible light can't pass through him, but high energy xrays can. These seem contradictory.
instructions unclear. i am now a liquid.
Thank you
Very true
Well... 70% anyway.
I wonder why I didn't wonder about this very important question before this. Thank you, UA-cam algorithm for bringing me here. ❤
We are all first till’ we refresh 💜
I already conceptually and kinda mathematically understood how electrons and their interactions with light and such lead to larger phenomenon
but its nice to hear a short n sweet conceptual overview to jog my memory
lucky me you're not going hard and fast in to the math of qft as a conceptual basis for electron interactions
thank God.
I can’t be the only person who looked at their hand and looked to see if you could make it see through
I'm liking how everything is starting to take a quantum mechanics explanation.
0:05 really? Its OK to be smart! Using a baseball stadium as measurement is the most american thing i've ever heard!
in future , we can have special lenses that produces different wavelength of light and then we can see through anything as we wish.....😁😁😁😁😁
@@not_a_chess_grandmaster what does that have to do with my comment?
I like how you used Mario Bros. for your example, and then you have the official Nintendo Mario Lego set in your bookshelf lol (5:40)
I want more smart friends...I be having these types of conversations with myself...
I relate with you.. all my friends are just dumb asses.. all they care about are some shitty video games.
I do have smart friends but they don't like talking about subjects because they only correlate studying to good grades, nothing else besides that xD. It's a real shame.
@@ajay2552 yupp they just gotta talk about Netflix in the science club
I once watched a documentary where a teenage boy could TRANSFORM the structure of his molecular arrangement and atoms and take up different forms, some of them even invisible to naked human eyes. It was posssible due to a device that mutated his bodily structure at atomic level. The scientist however wasn't given the recognition he deserved and Nobel prize was unjustly given to other less deserving scientists. Poor Azmuth.
RE-Upload?
ikr? i had opened the video on chrome, went to sleep, wake up and continued and halfway through the video said "unavailable" lol here's the original link ua-cam.com/video/sUmsQTmXGFg/v-deo.html
Merry Christmas Joe! Thanks for all the great content!
PBS is supported my tax dollars!
I don't think it's exactly accurate to say that repulsion between electrons is what causes the force that stops atoms from going through each other. For neutral atoms, the summed repulsion between electron clouds and between nuclei is not as strong as the attraction between the nucleus of one atom and electrons of the other because of the way that atoms rearrange themselves when they get near each other. (That's why covalent bonds exist.) It's electron degeneracy pressure, which has more to do with the Pauli Exclusion Principle, that overcomes the net electromagnetic ATTRACTION. It's also important that matter sticks together and isn't destroyed by this electron degeneracy pressure, though, and that sticking together is pretty much entirely due to electromagnetic effects. The fact that electron degeneracy pressure, not electromagnetic repulsion, is what keeps matter "stable" (so objects don't all collapse to ridiculous densities or even black holes) was demonstrated theoretically by Freeman Dyson in 1967.