Generalizing the Function: Process Ontology and Free Energy (dialogue with Tim Jackson)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 24 кві 2024
- "The Speculative Generalization of the Function: A Key to Whitehead" by James Bradley: www.inflexions.org/n2_bradley...
4:12 Balancing Travel, Work, and Food poisoning
11:30 Balancing Travel, Work, and Fasting Experiences
17:30 Functions as relational properties
25:12 Whitehead's Organisms and Simondon's Analogies
30:44 Discussing Daniel Dennett's Influence
38:48 Representationalism, Ecological Perception, and Free Energy Principle
49:00 Organism-Environment Relationship and Dynamics
57:12 Conformity, Transduction, and Rock Analogies
at the end, the winnowing is where the eternal object is eternal in that it has a beginning and end as an object and this is the dance of the parts (molten rock) and the rest from that (solid rock) and the cone as an axle with one wheel off that allows levels, for a return. Thanks for the video!
7 degrees of connection between people since they are one object as time over itself. The differences from breaking symbiosis by eating grass family and the 7 radically different effects, where a person has a vulnerable place in their system. This changes their vibration, where an object has a frequency which having many parts can be attuned in the wiggle room of memory in the trumpet interface. Can a part of one object see an entire object whether their own object or others? When I see a green plant I see the surplus of energy in that part of an object in the memory trade space as a dance between a topology of spinning top (operation) and hourglass (structure).
Real patterns in the environment, the on off temporal conductor in the topological shift where off is an object fully contained within, and on is the opening as structure. Why individual free choice could enable collective free will.
If Gabriel's Trumpet is a cone, perhaps structure and operation are the shift from spinning top and hourglass as creativity in objects where the objects express over time as time. Tied to Carnot's heat cycle where "objects" appear and disappear, as frozen light in spinning top with persistence (all expression is no expression) and flipping as dynamic hourglass contained temporal, a conductor for parts to attune with. The longer civilization lasts the more the human object sees as a matching of eternal objects as attuning.
Great discussion! An organism that holds a map of the environment, and is also a map of the environment, is by definition two-sided if a non-binary (non either or) logic is to be adopted. Moreover, map making is the definition of energy mirroring, in my view. The many that become one, and the one that return to many, is equally two-sided and energetic in the mirror cosmology, in my view. And a side note: probability is a quantity of the Markov blanket that describes a map, like a landscape painting on an artist’s canvas, it does not necessarily extend to the greater territory. Hence, a probabilistic description of human nature does not invalidate our notion of freewill.
free will from free choice, as streamlining actions (reducing need) and allowing the different perceptions embedded as culture so that the embedded part within the person that causes stress (and caused culture initially) can be reduced, the free choice. Without the power of culture returning to the person in a simplified way for their expression, which ties to real differences in their environment to access which according to their personality, will be accessed differently, as culture.
Brain as a flower between structure and operation? Where the local (person) crystal stops growing but the entire human object has the possibility of growing? Like a giant flower as Gabriel's Trumpet interface as Gaia (travel in time) depending on the human flower.
The talk of “mapping,” in the sense of a function, being identified with (I think?) talk of a literal map seems slippery. Most importantly, in terms of semiotics, there’s a difference between a map as merely diagram (a type of icon) and as a dicisign (or proposition), ie a diagram paired with an index, signifying what it’s a map of. This is essentially the difference between an unsaturated or saturated function. The dicisign is what would be truth-valued, and thus what would most directly function within an inference/argument (including within an organism’s perception-action cycle considered as an inference). This would perhaps correlate to the difference between what Whitehead would call eternal objects and propositions.
Yipes! Wholesale irrelevancies!!!😅
Help me out here: why are these guys supposed to be interesting?
Let's talk turtlenecks!😅
You okay James?
@@Sampsonoff I should be asking you that. What was your favorite color again?