to all those people who complain about having the explanation accompany the game... this guy here dedicates his time to explain to you, morons, the way the GMs think and helps you get an insight into the minds of those geniuses. You complain about this, you make yourselves look moronic, no more. I actually enjoy the story unfold, because my mind is inquisitive, I want to explore all the options, I want to grasp why this or that move. So, keep up the good work, mate, I thoroughly enjoy your videos, that's such a pleasure!
Sidowse if he doesnt get money it would be diferent?, are you spending money whatching videos from youtube?... to watch a game without understanding makes sense for you so? i mean everyone is getting something here. But for me its not just that... here are very good chess profesors proud of teaching and explaining very well at the same time they enjoy...
OnlineChessLessons.NET keep doing great work the explanation is very intresting and helpful, some people guess they have the strongest mind of the universe or it is just envy? i still dont get the idea kasparov maybe was bored? haha... excuse if i said something wrong english is not my first lenguaje
I'm not sure how old the annotator is (I am now curious though), however the way he talks (which apparently annoyed some old heads) was kind of refreshing haha. I'm 19, about 2000 ELO, and it was just fun hearing things like "legit" "sketch" and "chill" in a chess video :)
To all people asking to see only the moves of the game, I connected on my youtube account for the first time in 2 years to answer here. You have to understand that showing a game with only the moves played would be not showing all the game you can't wait from someone to explain a game on only the basis of the move, he has to explain why they move like this and you can only explain that by showing also the other options or which attack the move prevents. I agree it can be difficult to follow when you are not so comfortable with chess yet or with chess diagramms but when you will have more understanding, you will appreciate the video more. To me cut those parts would be really not nice because that's what I look for when I watch an analysis of a game. If you just want the moves like others said you can find the moves in many books or online, but this is an analysis. To the author of the video, thank you very much I like the way you comment and explain, this is a very good video !
very instructive! the best thing about watching games is being able to take away general lessons that can be used in other games, not just specific moves. from this game, kasparov has shown material isn't everything!
With these awesome game analysis' and chess networks adrenaline rushing blitz games I can sleep easy at night knowing that my chess addiction is being satisfied daily whenever i am not at a board. Keep up the brilliant work!!
9:30 the move Rc1 was to avoid blacks from doing Bf5, Ke4, Bd4. The pawn in e4 can be moved out of the way, used for attacking or sacrificed. Or maybe Bd4, kd3, e4xc3, Ke2... in both cases that knight in c3 is in a very good place, so the pawn was used to move it out of there.
Definiately a great video! Yes... if the 2 rooks (vs Queen) have limited manuverability, (but this can be rectified by pawn advancement) or if a pawn is about to promote to assist the Queen, and many other scenarios, but from a power stand point- a K & 2 R's -vs- K & Q, the 2 R's are slightly stronger & usually will be. Nice meeting you Johnny!!!
Grandmasters have such great insight into chess. It is for us youtube chess enthusiasts to try and understand and learn something. Which is why I study chess much and upload youtube chess videos to also try and understand and explain great moves.
Worth noting at the critical position around the 8 minute mark white has the move Knight to B1 forcing black to trade his knight or move it out of c3 saving the position for white. The computer thinks the difference between this move and the move played in game at over a full piece.
The idea of capturing the bishop with the f rook was expained by Will in detail. White had no Kingside play at that time, so Gary was keeping things under watch on the Queenside. After that was taken care of he moved the both over to the kingside as effeciently as possible. It may seem like wasted moves but that's prophylaxis(sp?) Great analysis and commentary Will, thank goodness for the pause button, man you move through those positions fast. LOL
Hi, thanks for the video! This is one of Kasparov's games that I hadn't seen before. Can you tell me which chess client you are using by the way? Thanks in advance!
19:54 Better was: ... Rg3+ Kf2, Rg2+ Ke1, Bc3# If instead of Kf2, then: Ke3, Nxd5 cxd5, Rxf1 Bxg4, Rxg4 Nd3, Bd4+ Ke2, Rf7 White might as well have resigned and played Kf2 instead.
I backed up the video from your point of 18:34. The white bishop is actually on D1 and not E2 with black to move in the actual game. The Bishop is on E2 in a scenario the videographer is playing out. So if Black played: 1...Bd4 (a weak pin/skewer on K & Q) QxB would be safe for white in regards of: if Nd2 check Be1xd2. Your move Bd4 would be great if the white Bishop was on E2 instead of D1. (Sorry about the 3 attempts, my dyslexia kicked in)
I dont know why i fell to this part of youtube, but it's nice to learn something new. I like playing chess but just an amateur guy who runs his queen all over the places xD. Watching your analysis is really eyes-opening. Thank you!
i dont think he used too much time as this type of queen sacrifice is very well-known in the King's Indian Defense (check out a few games by Bronstein - he employed quite a few times in the 1950s and 60s) - Cheers, Will
No need to thank me...u do a great job. Anyone who is watching you should also be watching Mato and vice versa. You both fill a niche and complement each other perfectly. There is more than enough room for at least 2. Ha.
Rybka 4 for does not get red - not even for a second - 0.23 after 5 Minutes - absolutely sound exchange sac - and over the board quite shocking for Kramnik I guess. Next move close to blunder - losing a pawn. After h5 Kasparov played g4 - Re5 looks much stronger. The game itself an absolute all time classic - always a pleasure to see it again
I enjoy the explanations of alternative moves that could have been taken. But the sheer volume of them is confusing. It would be nice to add some visual aid, such as partially 'greying out' the screen during the discussion of alternatives and then returning to full contrast when the discussion reverts back to the actual game.
Did Kramnik 1) just not analyze and prepare the opening correctly with the possibility of playing against that sacrifice or is there 2) simply a likely win for black after that position regardless of what white plays? If there is a strong player I would a appreciate feedback; I think it is mostly the first one though.
I do think Kramnik did not look into this line as it does look a tad bit suspicious. I threw this position, after the queen sac into the computer and he gives almost rough equality. Just a handful of moves later, it says that black is almost winning. I let the computer play itself and it ended in a draw due to repetition where white had the queen for a rook and knight but black had, I think two pawns. That us a technical draw in most positions.
+Peter Smythe np. I live in Pakistan so I don't really go anywhere to play chess. There are no FIDE tournaments here. I do however play on a few websites. My classical rating on Chess24 stays a little below 2100 which isn't anywhere near 2100 FIDE. My chess journey began just a little over a year ago so I'm hoping to get stronger and then go abroad to play if I ever get the chance. :D
+Hassaan Pasha Thanks that is pretty good. I played club league a few years ago in Johannesburg for the first time with mixed results. Back when I had just turned 17 there was a trials for one of the provincial teams which I got 4 out of 5 and a few months later in the post I got a letter saying i was 15 hundred and something; which I shrugged my shoulders to, "if you say so" I hadn't played in tournaments for a few years prior to that. I am definitely a lot better since then but don't play enough rated matches to have any idea what my rated would be. But being in a club full of stronger players is quite humbling. This guy was one of the stronger players in the club www.chessgames.com/player/nicholas_van_der_nat.html .
Thanks a lot for the video! I think, 1. Bg4 is a mistake for White at 16:00, because after 1...Be5! (with a mate threat at h2) it's position seems to crash. If 2.Rg2 then just 2...R:g2 and then 3...B:g4. If 2.Kf1, then 2...B:g4 3.R:g4 Rf3 and 4... Kf2+ (with 5...K:g4) Am I right?
Thanks for sharing and commentating this great game, Will. I have seen many of your videos and it's really cool work you do. Maybe next time you could do some preparation in advance, because some of the lines you talked about didn't work (seen similar things in other of your videos). For example, at 16.40 you said that "white might be able to draw this", which is sadly not correct. 1... Bc3 Forces 2.Nf1 when 2... Rf8 picks up the f2 pawn and three pawns extra will decide the outcome in favor for black. Another example, at 18:27 you played 1.Be2 so instead of 1...c5 which you played in the video - blacks wins with 1...Bd4! when 2.Qxd4 is meet by 2...Nxe2+ and black picks up the queen on d4. Overall, really nice work but maybe you could check your lines against a computer (or with a chess friend) before you record the video - to avoid these mistakes.
18:34 what if white decided to play Bd4, pinning the Queen to the king, and if Queen takes , Nxe2 forking the queen and the King? Is there any way to avoid losing the queen and being put in a bad position?
Bartosz Nakwasiński The En Passant move is one that allows you to capture when a pawn goes two squares on its first move, and you're right next to it, to just capture by going behind it. From my understanding it needs to be immediate, but that warrants checking with other sources.
Good effort on your commentaries, but you tend to go all over the place giving too many irrelevant variations. I would advice to have a simple script to guide your videos. 10 - 12min should be enough to go through the main lines relevant variations and and even a few off-script comments for good measure.
At 17:55 in the video, White has just played f3. Why didn't Kasparov now play Bd5?? Doesn't that win at once?? The bishop can't be taken because of exf3+. The queen's only square is e2. So I imagine White would respond Qe2 but now Rxf3! with the double threat of Bh6+ and Nf5+. Why is that not Game Over? If Rxf3 then exf3+ etc. If Kh1 or Kh2 then Nf5 with double threat of Nxe2 and Rh6+.
Really good analysis! I think this should be the minimum time for a game analysis! Well if you don't learn from the game then what was the motive of watching the video? Those people who complain about the time limit are no good than trolls. Great video! Keep the good work!👍
i feel like the move Bd7 by kasparov was because after an immediate Nc5 there is the strong Na4 removing the powerful knight. Bd7 removes that possibility because the knight could just be taken.
...William....if i can make a few suggestions?As i am a slow player,it would be more pleasant to have the game recorded more slowly...particularly to have 'meditative spaces' so that the student can think for themselves.Also a step feature so one can go back step(move) by step.Anyway i enjoyed the game ....and thank you for downloading.
Thank you! And what about the other idea (Be5 at 16:00)? (See my previous comment.) It seems to prove that R:f2 was the best choice for Black, because if Bg4 does not work (that is my point), then there is no good move for White at that position.
Actually, in the line 29...Bd5 30. Qe2, Rxf3 31. Kh1 (or Kh2), Rh3+, 32. Kg2, Nf4+ 33. Rxf4, gxf4, Black has won an exchange AND a pawn and is threatening f3+ and it looks like an overwhelming position to me. Sorry I got my 6's and 3's, and my 5's and 4's confused in my last two comments!! But you know what I meant, right?
18:26 Be2 is a blunder, isn't it? ... Bd4 captures the queen (after Qxd4, black plays ... Nxe2 check and attacks the queen at the same time) so black is a piece and 2 pawns up. Very nice video. In contrast to a lot of other chess videos I found myself paying attention throughout the game.
Hi William and all OnlineChessLessons.NET team. Really thanks for this video and all your explanations, insights and comments about all these greats chess games which u bring in your youtube channel. By means of these insights i can better understand the games and really enjoy more and more chess! This would not be possible otherwise...Also, I can understand your english pronunciation very well and it helps me a lot since that i'm not a good english speaker. Please keep up these great works!
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
to all those people who complain about having the explanation accompany the game... this guy here dedicates his time to explain to you, morons, the way the GMs think and helps you get an insight into the minds of those geniuses. You complain about this, you make yourselves look moronic, no more. I actually enjoy the story unfold, because my mind is inquisitive, I want to explore all the options, I want to grasp why this or that move. So, keep up the good work, mate, I thoroughly enjoy your videos, that's such a pleasure!
d Thanks! I'm glad you like this video. There are different points of view about watching a chess game.
Sidowse if he doesnt get money it would be diferent?, are you spending money whatching videos from youtube?... to watch a game without understanding makes sense for you so? i mean everyone is getting something here. But for me its not just that... here are very good chess profesors proud of teaching and explaining very well at the same time they enjoy...
OnlineChessLessons.NET keep doing great work the explanation is very intresting and helpful, some people guess they have the strongest mind of the universe or it is just envy? i still dont get the idea kasparov maybe was bored? haha... excuse if i said something wrong english is not my first lenguaje
Thanks Jose!
d Your idiotic rant was unprovoked and unnecessary. Go away!
I'm not sure how old the annotator is (I am now curious though), however the way he talks (which apparently annoyed some old heads) was kind of refreshing haha. I'm 19, about 2000 ELO, and it was just fun hearing things like "legit" "sketch" and "chill" in a chess video :)
To all people asking to see only the moves of the game, I connected on my youtube account for the first time in 2 years to answer here. You have to understand that showing a game with only the moves played would be not showing all the game you can't wait from someone to explain a game on only the basis of the move, he has to explain why they move like this and you can only explain that by showing also the other options or which attack the move prevents. I agree it can be difficult to follow when you are not so comfortable with chess yet or with chess diagramms but when you will have more understanding, you will appreciate the video more. To me cut those parts would be really not nice because that's what I look for when I watch an analysis of a game. If you just want the moves like others said you can find the moves in many books or online, but this is an analysis. To the author of the video, thank you very much I like the way you comment and explain, this is a very good video !
motwhugues H Thanks for your support!
very instructive! the best thing about watching games is being able to take away general lessons that can be used in other games, not just specific moves. from this game, kasparov has shown material isn't everything!
Wow. I am so impressed with the sacrifice itself as well as the analysis and commentary. Well done, everyone
Impecable deep analisys dude, reaaally instructive and DAT BISHOP E7 was chill! XD
+Marc Espejo Ruiz Thanks!
+Marc Espejo Ruiz I agree, great job. And what a brilliant sacrifice.
Bishop D7*
With these awesome game analysis' and chess networks adrenaline rushing blitz games I can sleep easy at night knowing that my chess addiction is being satisfied daily whenever i am not at a board. Keep up the brilliant work!!
9:30 the move Rc1 was to avoid blacks from doing Bf5, Ke4, Bd4. The pawn in e4 can be moved out of the way, used for attacking or sacrificed. Or maybe Bd4, kd3, e4xc3, Ke2... in both cases that knight in c3 is in a very good place, so the pawn was used to move it out of there.
For anyone who knows anything about chess when we are talking about Kasparov it is obvious he is the one crushing!!!
He not only sacs the Queen and wins, but makes it look easy! Kasparov was never threatened once in this game.
This seems like computer's 10 level game
Incredible video, tremendously eloquent and informative teaching style
Definiately a great video!
Yes... if the 2 rooks (vs Queen) have limited manuverability, (but this can be rectified by pawn advancement) or if a pawn is about to promote to assist the Queen, and many other scenarios, but from a power stand point- a K & 2 R's -vs- K & Q, the 2 R's are slightly stronger & usually will be.
Nice meeting you Johnny!!!
Grandmasters have such great insight into chess. It is for us youtube chess enthusiasts to try and understand and learn something. Which is why I study chess much and upload youtube chess videos to also try and understand and explain great moves.
Worth noting at the critical position around the 8 minute mark white has the move Knight to B1 forcing black to trade his knight or move it out of c3 saving the position for white. The computer thinks the difference between this move and the move played in game at over a full piece.
I've been watching some of your Chess videos... I enjoy them a great deal.
thank you
K
This is why i think he is the greatest chess player of all time just unbelievable chess amazing foresight
at 20:47, could white respond with Rc2 and then Pg2+; Rxg2; NxRg2; KxNg2
might be possible to draw?
No the final is lost for white
Excellent video, thanks! The only thinhg I don't get is why some people want a shorter version when your analysis is what makes it worthseeing!
Maybe Kasparov was just bored as hell.
Friar Tuck i thought same thing guess he could keep save the queen before making a move or no?
Thanks for the feedback!
The idea of capturing the bishop with the f rook was expained by Will in detail. White had no Kingside play at that time, so Gary was keeping things under watch on the Queenside. After that was taken care of he moved the both over to the kingside as effeciently as possible.
It may seem like wasted moves but that's prophylaxis(sp?)
Great analysis and commentary Will, thank goodness for the pause button, man you move through those positions fast. LOL
thanks Will, i really enjoyed your video
thank you! this video is great! please keep them coming =)
Hi, thanks for the video! This is one of Kasparov's games that I hadn't seen before. Can you tell me which chess client you are using by the way? Thanks in advance!
i use jinchess for mac with ICC - thanks for watching! Will
19:54
Better was:
... Rg3+
Kf2, Rg2+
Ke1, Bc3#
If instead of Kf2, then:
Ke3, Nxd5
cxd5, Rxf1
Bxg4, Rxg4
Nd3, Bd4+
Ke2, Rf7
White might as well have resigned and played Kf2 instead.
You are right! Good catch there - ..Bd4 is a sneaky move in that position!
Excellent and thorough analysis...thanks.
15:06 best move is rook check, followed up by dark square bishop check and night check forcing queen to take,
Thanks!
Very good positional understanding and commenting! Thanks
I backed up the video from your point of 18:34. The white bishop is actually on D1 and not E2 with black to move in the actual game. The Bishop is on E2 in a scenario the videographer is playing out.
So if Black played:
1...Bd4 (a weak pin/skewer on K & Q)
QxB would be safe for white in regards of: if Nd2 check Be1xd2.
Your move Bd4 would be great if the white Bishop was on E2 instead of D1.
(Sorry about the 3 attempts, my dyslexia kicked in)
Beautiful game and great analysis!
New to your channel. Fantastic analysis. Engrossing. Thanks.
Thanks!
Instead of the Qd8 sacrifice another possibility created by Bh4 is provoking g6-g5;Bg3;Ne4 and then f7-f5-f4
Great analysis! Keep up the good work!
Amazing game. These guys play in a whole different dimension.
Very good game, very instructive and well explained! Thank you for your videos and kind regards from austria
I dont know why i fell to this part of youtube, but it's nice to learn something new. I like playing chess but just an amateur guy who runs his queen all over the places xD. Watching your analysis is really eyes-opening. Thank you!
Your profile pic LOL
Thanks buddy!
Thanks Alex!
great analysis - at 18.26 white's Be2 ... never mind that Bd4
wins immediately .... is your rating above 1600 ?
Very thorough analysis for a beginner like myself...thanks!
yea i think you are right - this line just reminded me of it. Cheers, Will
Thank you very much for your hard work. Great job!
Thanks buddy! Happy Holidays!
Thank you for your comment!
Great video, thanks. Do you know how much time Kasparov used to think over the queen sacrifice?
omg,,,vry good game for students like me ...specially I learn how to co~ordiante pieces and lots of new things,,,thank you guys.vry much..
Thanks Daniel!
14:00 how black pon e4 can take white e4 pon???? Is it possible?
Yes it is. Google En passant
i dont think he used too much time as this type of queen sacrifice is very well-known in the King's Indian Defense (check out a few games by Bronstein - he employed quite a few times in the 1950s and 60s) - Cheers, Will
No need to thank me...u do a great job. Anyone who is watching you should also be watching Mato and vice versa. You both fill a niche and complement each other perfectly. There is more than enough room for at least 2. Ha.
On Be2 (18:33), ...Bd4 followed by ...Ne2 check and forking wins for Black
True! thx for commenting!
Ty for the vid, very very nice!
Rybka 4 for does not get red - not even for a second - 0.23 after 5 Minutes - absolutely sound exchange sac - and over the board quite shocking for Kramnik I guess.
Next move close to blunder - losing a pawn. After h5 Kasparov played g4 - Re5 looks much stronger. The game itself an absolute all time classic - always a pleasure to see it again
Very instructive video!
I enjoy the explanations of alternative moves that could have been taken. But the sheer volume of them is confusing. It would be nice to add some visual aid, such as partially 'greying out' the screen during the discussion of alternatives and then returning to full contrast when the discussion reverts back to the actual game.
Did Kramnik 1) just not analyze and prepare the opening correctly with the possibility of playing against that sacrifice or is there 2) simply a likely win for black after that position regardless of what white plays?
If there is a strong player I would a appreciate feedback; I think it is mostly the first one though.
I do think Kramnik did not look into this line as it does look a tad bit suspicious. I threw this position, after the queen sac into the computer and he gives almost rough equality. Just a handful of moves later, it says that black is almost winning. I let the computer play itself and it ended in a draw due to repetition where white had the queen for a rook and knight but black had, I think two pawns. That us a technical draw in most positions.
is*
+Hassaan Pasha Thanks;
out of curiosity where do you do chess, and vaguely what levels have you achieved.
+Peter Smythe np. I live in Pakistan so I don't really go anywhere to play chess. There are no FIDE tournaments here. I do however play on a few websites. My classical rating on Chess24 stays a little below 2100 which isn't anywhere near 2100 FIDE. My chess journey began just a little over a year ago so I'm hoping to get stronger and then go abroad to play if I ever get the chance. :D
+Hassaan Pasha Thanks that is pretty good.
I played club league a few years ago in Johannesburg for the first time with mixed results.
Back when I had just turned 17 there was a trials for one of the provincial teams which I got 4 out of 5 and a few months later in the post I got a letter saying i was 15 hundred and something; which I shrugged my shoulders to, "if you say so" I hadn't played in tournaments for a few years prior to that. I am definitely a lot better since then but don't play enough rated matches to have any idea what my rated would be. But being in a club full of stronger players is quite humbling.
This guy was one of the stronger players in the club www.chessgames.com/player/nicholas_van_der_nat.html .
Well , in 18:26 you can just play Bd4 right away , if he takes there's a knight fork.
Great commentary!
ty you,,opponent must have been felt nuts when queen sacrifice
Bobby fisher vs kasparow
Kasparow:sacrifices queen
Fisher:sacrifices anything else
Beautiful game and good commentary ;)
Thanks a lot for the video!
I think, 1. Bg4 is a mistake for White at 16:00, because after 1...Be5! (with a mate threat at h2) it's position seems to crash. If 2.Rg2 then just 2...R:g2 and then 3...B:g4. If 2.Kf1, then 2...B:g4 3.R:g4 Rf3 and 4... Kf2+ (with 5...K:g4)
Am I right?
Thanks for watching!
Thanks for sharing and commentating this great game, Will.
I have seen many of your videos and it's really cool work you do.
Maybe next time you could do some preparation in advance, because some of the lines you talked about didn't work (seen similar things in other of your videos).
For example, at 16.40 you said that "white might be able to draw this", which is sadly not correct.
1... Bc3 Forces
2.Nf1 when
2... Rf8 picks up the f2 pawn
and three pawns extra will decide the outcome in favor for black.
Another example, at 18:27 you played
1.Be2 so instead of 1...c5 which you played in the video - blacks wins with
1...Bd4! when
2.Qxd4 is meet by
2...Nxe2+ and black picks up the queen on d4.
Overall, really nice work but maybe you could check your lines against a computer (or with a chess friend) before you record the video - to avoid these mistakes.
+hasndens Thanks for your comments. I take note of your suggestions!
Way to go, letting youtube put ads right in the middle of a chess lecture, actually cutting you off mid-sentence. Dammit man.
18:34 what if white decided to play Bd4, pinning the Queen to the king, and if Queen takes , Nxe2 forking the queen and the King? Is there any way to avoid losing the queen and being put in a bad position?
Make more with queen sac! Nice commentary!
Great video thanks!!
Great video!
I think at 3:15 Bd7 is to stop white from playing Nc-a4 after after black plays Nc4
14:00 how you can capture by pawn?
they are next to each other.
I dont get this.
Google or look for a video called "En Passant" that's a chess rule made up in the 17th century. To allow pawns to move 2 squares in the beginning.
Bartosz Nakwasiński The En Passant move is one that allows you to capture when a pawn goes two squares on its first move, and you're right next to it, to just capture by going behind it. From my understanding it needs to be immediate, but that warrants checking with other sources.
Bartosz Nakwasiński Its called en passant (bicie w przelocie)
Alex Von Seggern I doesn't need to be immediate.
and that's why this dude is the best chess player in history
Not only this, but it is certainly a good business card
Good effort on your commentaries, but you tend to go all over the place giving too many irrelevant variations. I would advice to have a simple script to guide your videos. 10 - 12min should be enough to go through the main lines relevant variations and and even a few off-script comments for good measure.
Why is ted mosby in the thumbnail?
At 17:55 in the video, White has just played f3. Why didn't Kasparov now play Bd5?? Doesn't that win at once?? The bishop can't be taken because of exf3+. The queen's only square is e2. So I imagine White would respond Qe2 but now Rxf3! with the double threat of Bh6+ and Nf5+. Why is that not Game Over? If Rxf3 then exf3+ etc. If Kh1 or Kh2 then Nf5 with double threat of Nxe2 and Rh6+.
good call!
Really good analysis!
I think this should be the minimum time for a game analysis!
Well if you don't learn from the game then what was the motive of watching the video?
Those people who complain about the time limit are no good than trolls.
Great video!
Keep the good work!👍
Thanks!
i feel like the move Bd7 by kasparov was because after an immediate Nc5 there is the strong Na4 removing the powerful knight. Bd7 removes that possibility because the knight could just be taken.
thanks.great work.
if you want the moves only, load the png into a program and hit next move till you are done.
...William....if i can make a few suggestions?As i am a slow player,it would be more pleasant to have the game recorded more slowly...particularly to have 'meditative spaces' so that the student can think for themselves.Also a step feature so one can go back step(move) by step.Anyway i enjoyed the game ....and thank you for downloading.
very instructive game where how use pieces block activities. thanks very much
Perfect review.
Thank you! And what about the other idea (Be5 at 16:00)? (See my previous comment.) It seems to prove that R:f2 was the best choice for Black, because if Bg4 does not work (that is my point), then there is no good move for White at that position.
lol "bishop E7 is pretty chill"
excellent analysis
This is just epic, can't say anything else really lol, chess heaven! :D
Put the subtitles and go to 0:19. Enjoy! :)
+Mirel Baila Gay Castro haha!
+Mirel Baila 1:04 In this game white wine also has a lot to racism
At 20:00, what if Bd4 instead of Kh3+? No defense against Rh3!
nice video great analysis
good call
Actually, in the line 29...Bd5 30. Qe2, Rxf3 31. Kh1 (or Kh2), Rh3+, 32. Kg2, Nf4+ 33. Rxf4, gxf4, Black has won an exchange AND a pawn and is threatening f3+ and it looks like an overwhelming position to me.
Sorry I got my 6's and 3's, and my 5's and 4's confused in my last two comments!! But you know what I meant, right?
awesome game! thank you
Great stuff
18:26 Be2 is a blunder, isn't it? ... Bd4 captures the queen (after Qxd4, black plays ... Nxe2 check and attacks the queen at the same time) so black is a piece and 2 pawns up.
Very nice video. In contrast to a lot of other chess videos I found myself paying attention throughout the game.
Hi William and all OnlineChessLessons.NET team. Really thanks for this video and all your explanations, insights and comments about all these greats chess games which u bring in your youtube channel. By means of these insights i can better understand the games and really enjoy more and more chess! This would not be possible otherwise...Also, I can understand your english pronunciation very well and it helps me a lot since that i'm not a good english speaker. Please keep up these great works!
tubol0 Thanks!