This is a good video, but the "premise" of the video was to show a methodology for when you do not have time: However in the execution you went from "bad renders" produced quickly, to getting inspiration from AI and then doing the whole re-desiging and rendering process in lumion and re-rendering it. Hence in conclusion AI is just for inspiration and might give you hundreds of inspirational reference images (or confusion) and after all is said and done, you have to go back to lumion (or whatever you are using to render) and do it all 'for real' for your actual project. Thus in my experience with lumion models and AI, just inspires you to keep going, but not necessarily "cut on time"...
Thank you for your feedback! You bring up a great point about the time factor. What we meant to convey about the time factor is that we can achieve a good quality render by analyzing the project with AI and not necessarily have to go through the 'bad render' phase and re-do it again. That part was only for conveying the idea. Thanks for watching and sharing your insights!
The ones that say that AI is inaccurate and not useful for final results don't know how to use it. It's true it's not perfect but I passed from spending many hours or days doing a rendering to just 1-2 hours and with better quality. Before I had to spend time putting textures on models, rendering, choosing light, putting people on the model or cutouts on photoshop, doing post-production and a lot of things. Now I just spend like a few minutes doing trials and liitle bit of touch ups on PS and that's it.
Thanks for sharing your experience! You're right-AI has significantly improved efficiency in rendering. While it's not perfect, it can save a lot of time and enhance quality when used correctly!
This is a good video, but the "premise" of the video was to show a methodology for when you do not have time: However in the execution you went from "bad renders" produced quickly, to getting inspiration from AI and then doing the whole re-desiging and rendering process in lumion and re-rendering it. Hence in conclusion AI is just for inspiration and might give you hundreds of inspirational reference images (or confusion) and after all is said and done, you have to go back to lumion (or whatever you are using to render) and do it all 'for real' for your actual project. Thus in my experience with lumion models and AI, just inspires you to keep going, but not necessarily "cut on time"...
Thank you for your feedback! You bring up a great point about the time factor. What we meant to convey about the time factor is that we can achieve a good quality render by analyzing the project with AI and not necessarily have to go through the 'bad render' phase and re-do it again. That part was only for conveying the idea. Thanks for watching and sharing your insights!
تحياتي سلمان محمد
The ones that say that AI is inaccurate and not useful for final results don't know how to use it. It's true it's not perfect but I passed from spending many hours or days doing a rendering to just 1-2 hours and with better quality. Before I had to spend time putting textures on models, rendering, choosing light, putting people on the model or cutouts on photoshop, doing post-production and a lot of things. Now I just spend like a few minutes doing trials and liitle bit of touch ups on PS and that's it.
Thanks for sharing your experience! You're right-AI has significantly improved efficiency in rendering. While it's not perfect, it can save a lot of time and enhance quality when used correctly!
great effort salmaan !
same situation ,but i hunddle it
Is there any link bridge between sketch up and lumion...
I'm using Lumion live sync which is also free
Sir give me lumion efforts
AI so powerful
but it make designer fee become lower and then could take over the designer job
ai is best but paid is correct
Sir give me lumion efforts
Check link in description