I get the intuition behind SOSD, but I don't get the definition because F's area under the curve is bigger G's area under the curve after x=20, can you explain why the definition is still true.
Remember that it’s the cumulative area under F versus the cumulative area under G. I do have a mistake where my integrals should start at - infinity not at 0. Starting at x=20 the cumulative difference in areas starts shrinking but the cumulative area under G is always greater than or equal to the cumulative area under F. Does that help?
best explanation even in the whole UA-cam
Thank you so much I’m glad this is helpful! Feel free to share with classmates and I appreciate the comment!
I'm strugging first year PhD micro and you are saving my life
I’m so glad this is helping you!
very clear!
I’m glad it was helpful thank you for leaving a comment!
Thank you!
I’m glad this was helpful thank you for the comments!
u are godsent
I’m glad it was helpful and thank you for leaving a comment!
Great video, thank you !
I’m so glad it was helpful thank you for leaving the comment!
I get the intuition behind SOSD, but I don't get the definition because F's area under the curve is bigger G's area under the curve after x=20, can you explain why the definition is still true.
Remember that it’s the cumulative area under F versus the cumulative area under G. I do have a mistake where my integrals should start at - infinity not at 0. Starting at x=20 the cumulative difference in areas starts shrinking but the cumulative area under G is always greater than or equal to the cumulative area under F.
Does that help?
It does, thank you very much.😄
@benjaminkjaerhansen4733 awesome I’m glad that helps! Great question and glad the video was helpful!