The Chicago Bulls Are Making Zach Lavine Available for Trade Again. Should the Lakers Finally Bite?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 гру 2024
  • Спорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 18

  • @lakerslegacypod
    @lakerslegacypod  17 днів тому +1

    How's everyone feeling about the Lakers' prospects heading into this year's NBA Trade Deadline?
    Do you guys have any Trade Tenets/Rules of your own that you want to see employed by Pelinka?
    And...What are your guys' updated thoughts on Trading for Zach LaVine?

  • @juanjuan799
    @juanjuan799 17 днів тому +3

    We need CAM REDDISH, without question.

  • @artworthi
    @artworthi 17 днів тому +6

    You can get away with that because of Dalton & Austin Reaves (Two Starting Role Players making less than $15 M) This makes a 3 star model work. Not to mention Kolokko and Quincy

    • @lakerslegacypod
      @lakerslegacypod  17 днів тому +1

      It’s a great point. Lakers are much more well-equipped now to make a move like this than they were in 2022 with just Russ + Minimums

  • @lorenzoybarra4111
    @lorenzoybarra4111 17 днів тому +2

    Instead of pushing for Lavine, maybe Ingram fills more of a void for the team as far as a two way wing and third star.

    • @truckerstar24
      @truckerstar24 17 днів тому +3

      I’ve thought of that as well. Only thing is Ingram would probably cost picks and there’s not guarantee he’ll stay next year.

    • @lorenzoybarra4111
      @lorenzoybarra4111 17 днів тому +1

      @ I feel u. However, I think closer to the deadline perhaps maybe just one frp will do. Because the pels are also not wanting to lose him for nothing. As far as him not being a guarantee for next year, neither is Lavine lol. At least with Ingram we have some cap relief if things don’t work out, and not stuck with Lavines huge contract while he is injured.

    • @lorenzoybarra4111
      @lorenzoybarra4111 17 днів тому +1

      @@truckerstar24 sorry that last response was for u but I pressed the wrong button.

    • @truckerstar24
      @truckerstar24 16 днів тому +2

      @@lorenzoybarra4111 when I mean guarantee I mean are the lakers going to be able to retain him. You can’t just trade a couple players and maybe 2nd round picks for someone and they just walk in free agency. That would be even worse than keeping our guys. As far as Lavine as least the contract is there if you trade for him you know he’ll be in your roster next year. Injuries and amount of salary concerns me though.

    • @jay12120
      @jay12120 15 днів тому

      Ingram is more expensive than lavine tho. While lavine is the better offensive player

  • @juanjuan799
    @juanjuan799 17 днів тому +2

    We need to trade for DORIAN finney Smith, and Cam Johnson.

  • @juanjuan799
    @juanjuan799 17 днів тому +2

    The Zach Lavine trade, will not
    Be a good deal, for the lakers.
    It just doesn't work out. TO
    MUCH SALARY, to many
    Players to give up, to many
    Injuries. RISKY.

  • @jay12120
    @jay12120 15 днів тому

    Lakers need to get lavine. They will never get an elite scorer for cheaper than him. Ever. And it would be a super homerun if they can include vanderbilt in that trade instead of rui. Lakers cant expect bron to carry them thru the playoffs as a scorer every game. And because he wont cost 2 fr picks, lakers would still have draft capital to get a center.