Hechsker-Ohlin model using production possibility fronter

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 58

  • @hounamao7140
    @hounamao7140 8 років тому +20

    so much better than my lecturer, thank you

  • @niltonc.7333
    @niltonc.7333 8 років тому +5

    Thank you Professor, very well explained, helped me a lot!

  • @ingridgomez1323
    @ingridgomez1323 6 років тому +1

    Finally I can undestand this model, after so many times Thank you!!

  • @meesarcomedy8069
    @meesarcomedy8069 8 років тому

    my lecture is the best ever from SA.., good work in yours side

  • @teresa9903
    @teresa9903 6 років тому +2

    Really really good! Great explanation!

  • @MominNz
    @MominNz 5 років тому

    Thanks for a great video. was very hard to find a proper short video with easy to understand info plus not added with too many other assumptions.

    • @MominNz
      @MominNz 5 років тому

      I've given my MSc exam in which all models. from Gravity, Ric, HO and Specific model was asked, I've taken this info and incorporated it. It was very well appreciated.👍

  • @dmdivyajyoti2
    @dmdivyajyoti2 8 років тому +2

    Thank you Sir, your video was really helpful.

  • @weightlesness
    @weightlesness 8 років тому

    thank you so much! the first time i understand..wonderful method of teaching thank you

  • @bastidepauline9211
    @bastidepauline9211 5 років тому

    thank you! you make it really easy to understand

  • @worldtogether
    @worldtogether 9 років тому +3

    the two countries will consume in the same ratio when faced with the same relative price under free trade. They are subject to same indifference curves which are tangent to PPFs in different point and these are the reasons of relative price differences.

    • @worldtogether
      @worldtogether 7 років тому +1

      yes:)

    • @suindude8149
      @suindude8149 14 днів тому

      The matter will be actually the indifference of the goods will be producing only single cut at the production possibility in short run may be more than one,say tangential to the PPF.Hence,there will be several relative price changes accoding to the demand.
      One thing there may arise different PPF as well in short or long run.

  • @ranomardanova5671
    @ranomardanova5671 2 роки тому

    Wonderful explained
    Thanks

  • @carlosvalencia431
    @carlosvalencia431 7 років тому

    very helpful professor Mike. Regards from Mexico 😁

  • @suindude8149
    @suindude8149 14 днів тому

    Sir as the production possibility frontier are different hence there should be two constraint on production,in this case the demand is implicitly different hence they cannot be consumed with a same proportion or 1:1.

  • @guilhermelagovanalli6927
    @guilhermelagovanalli6927 2 роки тому

    Great explanation!!! Thanks

  • @olafvandenberg6683
    @olafvandenberg6683 5 років тому

    Thank you sir! Very helpfull and clear

  • @sahraismeal7760
    @sahraismeal7760 8 років тому

    That was super helpful....Thank you!!

  • @hamzaafandi9293
    @hamzaafandi9293 9 років тому +1

    Thanks, very well explained.
    All throughout the video I kept thinking about how much you'd look like J.K Simmons in Whiplash if you shaved your head.

  • @Deniz-ci3wm
    @Deniz-ci3wm 10 років тому

    First of all thanks for the video, my proposal to you is to number related clips so people won't have to search them.

  • @LinhNguyen-xs7bo
    @LinhNguyen-xs7bo 9 років тому

    thank you so much. Easy to understand.

  • @ericwhite7018
    @ericwhite7018 10 років тому +1

    in which video do you explain why the price line must be a line tangent to the ppf? i checked out almost all your videos but i do not find an explanation for this basic issue. would be great if you could help me out with that!

    • @DrPCVermaEconomist
      @DrPCVermaEconomist 4 роки тому

      Visit DrPCVerma Economist video that price line is tangent to PPF OR PPC for satisfying necessary condition for maxima condition for utility . For Eric White.

  • @경희윤언더우드국제대
    @경희윤언더우드국제대 2 роки тому

    Goood job Mike

  • @shampaakhter3511
    @shampaakhter3511 7 років тому

    Effective lecture..( Bangladesh)

  • @xueyuanli1828
    @xueyuanli1828 4 роки тому

    Thank you 👍

  • @shaheenazara5191
    @shaheenazara5191 8 років тому

    what relation between H-O and intra industry trade

  • @zhidanwang6260
    @zhidanwang6260 6 років тому

    Awesome Videos!

  • @1000Marcopeters
    @1000Marcopeters 6 років тому +6

    Great video! One minor suggestion: it might be easier to understand this concept using actual countries and goods, as it becomes a little hard to relate to country A, country B, good X and good Y :)

  • @andreydantas9049
    @andreydantas9049 8 років тому

    THANK YOU SO MUCH MAN!

  • @프로틴겅듀
    @프로틴겅듀 7 років тому

    very helpful thank you!

  • @leotanigutierrez4765
    @leotanigutierrez4765 8 років тому

    Thank you from California!

  • @tijanazivanovic6890
    @tijanazivanovic6890 4 роки тому

    Thank you!!!

  • @jamaldinelazaar5520
    @jamaldinelazaar5520 6 років тому

    all thanks for the video

  • @evangelineread1177
    @evangelineread1177 7 років тому

    How do you find if a country is K abundant and if a country is L abundant?

  • @АнастасияТарасова-с2и

    AMAZING!!!

  • @ericamelisaparedes1964
    @ericamelisaparedes1964 6 років тому

    Gracias!! Excelente!!

  • @Megastock0
    @Megastock0 8 років тому

    Nice timepiece, submariner?

  • @purvisurya5271
    @purvisurya5271 5 років тому

    Thankyou!

  • @cordster515
    @cordster515 9 років тому +2

    my dog Mr. Moore!

  • @bhuwansingh4499
    @bhuwansingh4499 6 років тому

    o so nice sir

  • @abhayrajendran7473
    @abhayrajendran7473 7 років тому

    thanks

  • @anjureynolds3630
    @anjureynolds3630 6 років тому

    Wooo Hoo Thanks !

  • @MarcCrusoe
    @MarcCrusoe 10 років тому +1

    Why K for capital ?!

    • @TheOne24060
      @TheOne24060 9 років тому

      marc crusoe most of economics letter conventions date back to european economists - probably because Germans right and pronounce capital as Kapital(?)

    • @odinviken
      @odinviken 9 років тому

      marc crusoe Capital in german is Das Kapital.

    • @racamalessev9330
      @racamalessev9330 6 років тому

      Because on Russian is Капитал

  • @bengtake5041
    @bengtake5041 7 років тому +8

    I don't understand anything.

    • @Africanlaura
      @Africanlaura 6 років тому +1

      I think he just made things complex

    • @ThatWookieGuy
      @ThatWookieGuy 6 років тому

      Which part friend? A good book if you are ever doing international economics is Salvatore International Economics.
      Maybe you already got your head round it.

    • @Explorer982
      @Explorer982 5 років тому

      Think of relative price as opportunity cost

  • @danipeidro3383
    @danipeidro3383 6 років тому

    Vaya VIH de teorema

  • @murtazaahmed3828
    @murtazaahmed3828 6 років тому

    it should be in urdu

  • @klajdihoxha9784
    @klajdihoxha9784 3 роки тому

    Thank you !