The ruling is certainly absurd. MP who has decided to leave his party must continue to support a party that has offended him just to make up the numbers of parliamentarians in parliament? What if the decision is made 6 months into establishing a new parliament. Must that person disaffected with his party stay with that party for 4 years? That would be impossible.
When you set a bad precedence, it leads to bad precedent and it leads to chaos.
The ruling is certainly absurd. MP who has decided to leave his party must continue to support a party that has offended him just to make up the numbers of parliamentarians in parliament? What if the decision is made 6 months into establishing a new parliament. Must that person disaffected with his party stay with that party for 4 years? That would be impossible.
If citizens are to comment on the work of parliament you would not be entertained there my friend.Shut up and do your work.