How would the axion fit into the standard model, or would it even fit? Would they be bosons since they have 0 spin? How could they be produced in such large numbers but still manifest as cold dark matter? If such a thing is assumed possible for axions then why are neutrinos assumed to be relativistic almost by nature? Lastly, would axions be heavier or lighter than neutrinos?
The problem with rounding too much (@0:40) is that while you say that there 5 times more dark matter than regular matter, you show a ratio of 4 on the screen. If you had shown dark matter at 84% and regular matter matter at 16% it would have been less disturbing... But thanks for the video.
Just started watching and i must point out that there needs to be an explanation about electron field and electrons as they seem to be 2 distinct things, where electric field in capacitor has not much to do with electrons on the plates.
And axions seem to be neutrino-antineutrino pairs (or neutrino-neutrino if majorana was correct) where they cause gravity, inertia and momentum while its vibration being the medium for light. We detect only single neutrinos via the weak force, but everything else is most likely that... Tesla calculated that the volume of earth of this ether would weigh just a few ounces
its like saying "you doctors are obsessed with medicine. I have always thought medicine is the wrong avenue". if you are not a doctor, or if you are not a physicist, it is just a nothing burger of a comment
Super informative. Thanks Chris
Thank you sm! Im creating a brand project named AXION so this is super helpful!!
Great explanation of a complex topic! Thanks
Very nice explanation! Keep up Chris 🙂
How would the axion fit into the standard model, or would it even fit? Would they be bosons since they have 0 spin? How could they be produced in such large numbers but still manifest as cold dark matter? If such a thing is assumed possible for axions then why are neutrinos assumed to be relativistic almost by nature? Lastly, would axions be heavier or lighter than neutrinos?
Nicely explained! 😁
Thanks! :)
The problem with rounding too much (@0:40) is that while you say that there 5 times more dark matter than regular matter, you show a ratio of 4 on the screen. If you had shown dark matter at 84% and regular matter matter at 16% it would have been less disturbing... But thanks for the video.
By “109” times weaker, i think you meant 10^9
Please what is the relation between massless quarks and theta?
Just started watching and i must point out that there needs to be an explanation about electron field and electrons as they seem to be 2 distinct things, where electric field in capacitor has not much to do with electrons on the plates.
And axions seem to be neutrino-antineutrino pairs (or neutrino-neutrino if majorana was correct) where they cause gravity, inertia and momentum while its vibration being the medium for light.
We detect only single neutrinos via the weak force, but everything else is most likely that...
Tesla calculated that the volume of earth of this ether would weigh just a few ounces
particles and their fields are the same thing, all a particle is, is an excitation in that field.
Did they really found Axion?
Awesome video!
Thanks! :)
You physicists are obsessed with particles. I have always thought particles are the wrong avenue.
Okay, so you are ignoring all experiments ever performed
@@MH-mc3pp not what I said. Every experiment to find dark matter particles, has come up with 0.
its like saying "you doctors are obsessed with medicine. I have always thought medicine is the wrong avenue". if you are not a doctor, or if you are not a physicist, it is just a nothing burger of a comment
@@MH-mc3pp I'm.ignoring you now