MJ16 P52 Q2 Paper 5 Tutorial | A2 Practical | CAIE A Level 9702 Physics

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 лип 2024
  • 9702/52/M/J/16: Tutorial on how to complete the written practical.
    #9702s16p52 #A2inversePowerP5Q2 #Lv1
    MJ16 P52 - FULL SOLVED past year.
    Intro 0:00 - Easy vs Hard questions
    Experiment intro 0:39 - Reading the question & Identifying constants
    Linearizing 1:53 - determine expression of gradient
    Table:
    3:02 - completing the table - transfer of headers & prefixes
    4:11 -finding absolute uncertainties for table values (Method 1: Identities)
    12:13 - (Method 2: Max Min Values/half the range.)
    15:18 - Comment on marking & errors.
    plot graph & error bar
    17:15 - DOUBLE CHECK your axes & comments on common errors.
    18:36 - ODD scales??
    19:11 - plotting begins? 1st reading.
    19:53 - NO inbetween plots, how to round.
    21:47 - First error bar drawing, BUT TOO SMALL.
    23:34 - is there a problem??!
    24:45 - corrected plot.
    28:11 - second plot & error bar for 6th reading
    Drawing Best Fit & Worse fit line
    29:17 - Completed graphs - discussion about error bar.
    30:18 - Best fit line - all points MUST be close, will not have anomalous.
    30:38 - How to Worse fit line. [Worse fit line MUST pass ALL error bars]
    Finding gradient and its uncertainty
    31:36 - gradient
    Calculations of resistivity, resistance & their uncertainties
    33:56 - resistivity
    36:00 - uncertainty in resistivity
    36:38 - Resistance of new wire. & its uncertainty
    How to: Written Practical | #A2physicsP5
    • Paper 5 A2 Physics 970...
    Instagram Pocket Guide ( / etphysics )
    More Resources (9702-physics.blogspot.com/)
    Support us! ( / etphysics )
    Tuition/Tutoring inquiries:
    Email: suitlin@gmail.com
    Whatsapp: wa.me/60126679171
    9702_s16_qp52 #CambridgeALevelPhysics

КОМЕНТАРІ • 55

  • @ellastewart8122
    @ellastewart8122 Рік тому +13

    This channel is just everything you need for your physics A level
    I pray for the well-being of both these beautiful ladies. May Allah guide them❤

  • @ontheway5792
    @ontheway5792 2 роки тому +8

    MAAAAANY THAAANKS FOR UR HELP

  • @nhatoan4280
    @nhatoan4280 2 роки тому +4

    so touching for an excellent video

  • @natashaobuseng3035
    @natashaobuseng3035 Рік тому +1

    ma'am with all due respect, you are such a vibe!🤣❤

  • @jeonkookie8620
    @jeonkookie8620 Рік тому +2

    For gradient calculation, which traingle should be bigger between Best fit and Worst fit line?

  • @mujtabashafi3775
    @mujtabashafi3775 10 місяців тому +1

    For the first point on the graph, the error is +-0.03 but the error bar is on the whole box which is 0.2, can someone explain why

  • @mridu5685
    @mridu5685 2 роки тому

    Thank you so much missssss

  • @jeonjk5763
    @jeonjk5763 Рік тому +1

    Ma'am, will there be a problem if I label the Best fit and Worst fit line in the grid of the graph? Or do I need to label them outside of the graph? 😯

  • @-a5962
    @-a5962 3 роки тому

    hello, why did you calculate 𐤃p/p 15/100 in part (e) while calculating the uncertainty of resistivity? shouldn't it be like 0.15/1.12 ? and if I calculate with that value I got my absolute uncertainty as 27 +- 6 and can we write 27 +- 6.2 just for the sake of sf or will that be wrong?

    • @ETphysics
      @ETphysics  3 роки тому +1

      15/100 is the percentage uncertainty in resistivity (15%= 0.15 as calculated in d(ii)
      Where and how did you arrive at 0.15/1.12 is not the percentage uncertainty? It is the ratio of percentage uncertainty to the value of resistivity, which doesn't follow the identities of uncertainty
      for final answers it is recommended to leave absolute uncertainty to 1sf and for the value to follow the decimal placing of absolute uncertainty.
      ie: 27+/- 7
      For more info, about these identities -
      watch:
      ua-cam.com/video/9mQSGuy0ugs/v-deo.html

  • @zeevictoria
    @zeevictoria 3 роки тому +8

    Hello miss, I have two questions. 1. For the error bar uncertainty to we round up or down?
    2. And for values of R and 1/d^2 , do we round up or down...or plot the exact value on the graph?
    Thank you so much.

    • @ETphysics
      @ETphysics  3 роки тому +3

      Values and uncertainties can be rounded up or down the the nearest box line.

  • @ahmedafzal4002
    @ahmedafzal4002 Рік тому +1

    19:47 :) LIFE ADVICE

  • @paawanjotkaur1901
    @paawanjotkaur1901 Рік тому +3

    Hello miss! My teacher said that you may get some points a bit distant from best fit line, and you can balance that by drawing the best fit line in between from those 'not touching line' points. She said some points may not touch the best fit line. I hope you understand what I'm saying. Is that correct?

  • @saisha1512
    @saisha1512 2 роки тому

    hi miss, how did you calculate the uncertainty for the gradient? at 33:16

    • @ETphysics
      @ETphysics  2 роки тому

      Find steepest/shallowest gradient from worst fit line, minus the best fit gradient!

  • @cloud_222
    @cloud_222 Рік тому

    I'm confused, should we make the absolute uncertainties to the same decimal places or sig figs? Because all of them here are to 2 sig figs except the first one and all are to 2 d.p. except the last one. Also, do we make them to the same sig figs/d.p. as the values of d or (1/d²)??
    Thank you!

    • @brotherkurp
      @brotherkurp Рік тому

      Significant figures and decimal places aren't the same thing, that's why there's two different terms to describe it. Decimal places means how many places after the decimal you have digits. Significant figures includes all the 'significant' numbers you have. Following this, 0 is not a significant number hence when discussing significant figures, we consider digits before zero only (not the same as decimal place! They taught this in third grade)

    • @cloud_222
      @cloud_222 Рік тому

      @brotherkurp8574 I know, that was not what I was asking about. In the table, they had some of the absolute uncertainties to the d.p. and some to the same sig figs.

  • @SKB05
    @SKB05 Рік тому +1

    example... 0.01/0.91 x 2 and after that did u multipy it by 1.21 and then what? i dont understand!!

    • @durkhanayjan7300
      @durkhanayjan7300 9 місяців тому

      u dont multiply it, u do 0.01/0.91 = ans^2 as in u take a square

  • @exopuppyhyun818
    @exopuppyhyun818 3 роки тому +5

    miss! p4 was easy but the i feel like the curve will be high! my paper went well even thought i got stuck at one question ..... i did what i could in the time i could hehe. since i found this channel late. before finding this channel my concept was not good. ANYWAY miss, i have a question. when values like 9.7 or 13.9 or 6.93 , we can just take them like 10, 14 and 7 right? bc it was differently plotted for each of the values on your graph . so i was wondering if it do that will loose marks or not :((((

    • @ETphysics
      @ETphysics  3 роки тому

      Just round those numbers to the nearest corner plot.

  • @tjveyd
    @tjveyd 2 роки тому +1

    Miss, can we draw a dashed line for worst fit line or should we draw a normal line?

    • @ETphysics
      @ETphysics  2 роки тому +2

      Do a normal line, but make sure to label which is best & worst fit!

    • @tjveyd
      @tjveyd 2 роки тому

      @@ETphysics Thank you Miss!

  • @moryamjamiu4467
    @moryamjamiu4467 Рік тому

    Ma
    I thought we were supposed draw circles over our point

  • @ashrafchowdhury866
    @ashrafchowdhury866 2 роки тому +1

    Miss miss, can I use dots instead of crosses for plotting graph?

    • @ETphysics
      @ETphysics  2 роки тому +5

      Crosses only, to be safe! Since the mark scheme says "no blobs"

    • @ashrafchowdhury866
      @ashrafchowdhury866 2 роки тому

      @@ETphysics Thank you so much for replying! I know many UA-cam teachers that don't ever reply to confusion related questions, but you guys are just amazing. Thanks again!

  • @sarahakram3819
    @sarahakram3819 3 роки тому +3

    Hey in Ciii) when finding the uncertainty you got 10^-6 answers for the B.F.L AND W.F.L but when subtracting the uncertainties you multiply it by 10^6 and not 10^-6
    Is that a mistake? I dont understand😭

    • @sarahakram3819
      @sarahakram3819 3 роки тому

      And the you have the final answer also as 10^6 but shouldn't it be multipied by 10^-6?

    • @ETphysics
      @ETphysics  3 роки тому +3

      @@sarahakram3819 Well done! You spotted a mistake from my student that I didn't see myself.
      You are right,
      Gradient of the lines, AND its uncertainty AND its final answer should all have the prefix of 10^-6
      Good job *thumbs up* keep learning and asking questions :)

    • @sarahakram3819
      @sarahakram3819 3 роки тому +1

      @@ETphysics oh thank you so much

  • @Italiyarishi
    @Italiyarishi 2 роки тому

    In Q2
    Why do we take 10^6 in gradient . Shouldn’t we bring the denominator up so it becomes 10^-6

    • @Italiyarishi
      @Italiyarishi 2 роки тому

      Plsss answer this . I have my boards tomorrow f m 2022

    • @Italiyarishi
      @Italiyarishi 2 роки тому

      😭😭😭

  • @Top7Facts
    @Top7Facts 3 роки тому

    hey why did you square (change in d /d)^2

    • @ETphysics
      @ETphysics  3 роки тому

      That's not squared - that is multiplied by 2!

    • @Top7Facts
      @Top7Facts 3 роки тому

      Oh thank you! Also on that note why’s it multiplied by 2? Thank you so much

    • @ETphysics
      @ETphysics  3 роки тому

      Its multiplied by 2 because in the original formula d is to the power of 2! (Throwback to combining uncertainties in AS)

  • @Tryingveryhardpls
    @Tryingveryhardpls Рік тому +1

    How do we calculate uncertainty when it’s not given in raw value?

    • @peaceandloveonthisplanetea6564
      @peaceandloveonthisplanetea6564 Рік тому +1

      If there’s multiple readings of a value (t1 and t2), then it will be (max value - min value)/2. Basically, the half of range.
      BUT keep in mind that if they take the reading for 10 cycles for eg, then divide the final value by 10

    • @Tryingveryhardpls
      @Tryingveryhardpls Рік тому

      @@peaceandloveonthisplanetea6564 THANK YOUUU

    • @peaceandloveonthisplanetea6564
      @peaceandloveonthisplanetea6564 Рік тому

      ⁠watch at 1:39:00 of their crash course vid, ua-cam.com/video/Y96u3bVE8Qc/v-deo.html
      Highly recommend to not skip the crash course, lot of key info there

  • @uraniumforce1221
    @uraniumforce1221 Рік тому

    Hi ms, is it ok to fill in the table using pencil?

    • @ETphysics
      @ETphysics  Рік тому +3

      Nope, use pen! Only the graph page can use pencil to draw.

    • @uraniumforce1221
      @uraniumforce1221 Рік тому +1

      @@ETphysics noted ms , thank you so much for replying

  • @aroojniazi9726
    @aroojniazi9726 3 роки тому +6

    Lmao I didn't know we could draw horizontal bars in such graphs

    • @ETphysics
      @ETphysics  3 роки тому +6

      They can be horizontal or vertical, we gotta read the question carefully!

    • @aroojniazi9726
      @aroojniazi9726 3 роки тому +1

      @@ETphysics it depends on the labelling on the axis right???

    • @ETphysics
      @ETphysics  3 роки тому +1

      @@aroojniazi9726yup and the uncertainties given in the table, so follow the question!

    • @ummmm55
      @ummmm55 10 місяців тому

      ​@@ETphysicsWHAT HOW IS IT VERTICAL??

  • @humanadeem8812
    @humanadeem8812 2 роки тому

    explain properly