'Trump did this’: Florida lawmaker pins abortion restrictions on the former President
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 тра 2024
- Florida's six-week abortion ban has gone into effect, cutting off access to critical reproductive care for much of the south. Florida State Rep. Fentrice Driskell and Paula Avila Guillen unpack the effects of the ban.
» Subscribe to MSNBC: / msnbc
Download our new MSNBC app for the latest breaking news and daily headlines at a glance: www.msnbc.com/information/dow...
Follow MSNBC Show Blogs
MaddowBlog: www.msnbc.com/maddowblog
ReidOut Blog: www.msnbc.com/reidoutblog
MSNBC delivers breaking news, in-depth analysis of politics headlines, as well as commentary and informed perspectives. Find video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, The Beat with Ari Melber, Deadline: White House, The ReidOut, All In, Last Word, 11th Hour, and Alex Wagner who brings her breadth of reporting experience to MSNBC primetime. Watch “Alex Wagner Tonight” Tuesday through Friday at 9pm Eastern.
Connect with MSNBC Online
Visit msnbc.com: www.msnbc.com/
Subscribe to the MSNBC Daily Newsletter: link.msnbc.com/join/5ck/msnbc...
Find MSNBC on Facebook: / msnbc
Follow MSNBC on Twitter: / msnbc
Follow MSNBC on Instagram: / msnbc
#Florida #Abortion #Trump
Of course the real fault with the people in Florida including a large percentage of women who voted for these representatives
"The purpose of separation of church and state is to keep forever from these shores the ceaseless strife that has soaked the soil of Europe with blood for centuries."
---James Madison, Founding Father, architect of the Constitution, and fourth President of the United States.
Exactly and the Freedom of Religion aspect of the 1st Amendment was written with that separation of church and state in mind. The government can't establish a national religion or prohibit exercise of any faith (even exercise of no faith), and because no one religion can be given national recognition as the United State's religion, no authoritative figure in any religion has any power over government officials by threats related to faith & religion. It subtly keeps our great nation safe from circular style power struggles that wreaked havoc over Europe (e.g. the circular power struggle between Emperor Charlemagne and the Pope in the Investiture Controversy).
The upcoming election will determine if America lives up to hopes and ideals or if it succumbs to bigotry, fear, and hatred. Are women second-class citizens? Do women accept being treated the way women were treated back in 1864... like property? our votes determine the outcome! 💙🇺🇸
“I don't view abortion as a choice and a right I think it's always a tragedy" stated Biden, and voted in favor of HR 1122 Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act of 1997, which criminalized partial-birth abortions except where necessary to save the life of the mother. The legislation passed, but President Clinton vetoed it in October 1997.
Again in 2007 Joe Biden stated he still opposed funding and policy in support of abortion.
@@paulaitix77Times have changed and so do peoples minds!
1864? You gals only have rights to vote for 100 years. Then you won you right to you body. Now you have ĺost that. What's next? So states ignored the federal law. It was overturned with the states being in charge but Florida is following a law Trump passed?😊
Yes that’s why I’ll proudly be voting for Trump in 2024 🇺🇸… not ww3 via Biden aka Obama
@@wpietrusOk, troll. Like you can vote from Russia😂😂😂😂
DeSantis deserves to be given credit for this as well.
Absolutely!!! 💯💯💯 .. DeSantis needs to receive an award or recognition for saving the lives of thousands of precious babies!! 🙏❤️
“If men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament”…Gloria Steinem
Hello Lisa 👋🌹💐
How are you?
Men build worlds and you birth more men to keep the world working do you part just like us men do our part
Vote blue 2024 💙🦋💙🦋💙
Why should I vote blue?
Vote RED!! ♥️♥️♥️ ...and save the BABIES!!!
Yes trump did do it. And it won't be the last dirty rotten thing he will do vote blue America for our freedom and our rights
WASHINGTON (AP) - One woman miscarried in the restroom lobby of a Texas emergency room as front desk staff refused to admit her. Another woman learned that her fetus had no heartbeat at a Florida hospital, the day after a security guard turned her away from the facility. And in North Carolina, a woman gave birth in a car after an emergency room couldn’t offer an ultrasound. The baby later died.
Florida is getting exactly what it signed up for in 2022. Hope they become wise this time round
Exactly. FL lost Congressional House seats, Val Demings lost the Senate race, Charlie Crist lost the governors race. Yep, couldn't agree more.
@@epochchange6803 yeah, Florida 🤣🤣🤣😂😂💩🤧
Nothing that isn’t old they been living like that, they prefer that it’s the south they not hurting it’s them dumb liberals coming down here
WHERE ARE THESE REPUB WOMEN THAT HAVE DAUGHTERS AND GRANDDAUGHTERS OF THEIR OWN ??? ONE DAY WE ALL DIE, IS THIS HOW THEY WANT THEIR DAUGHTERS AND GRANDDAUGHTERS FIGHTING FOR, WE NEED TO COME TOGETHER FOR OUR FUTURE ??? WHAT IF THEIR DAUGHTER OR GRANDDAUGHTER GETS PREGANANT AND SOMETHING GOES WRONG ????? DO THEY WANT THEM TO GO THROUGH WHAT THE WOMEN NOW ARE GOING THROUGH ????????
VOTE BLUE FOLKS FOR RIGHTS 💙💙💙💙🌊🌊🌊🌀🌀🌀
Take a look at red states that have put abortion on the ballot. The people have overwhelmingly voted to preserve them. It's the state legislatures that think they know best
What is a woman?
@@Mike-ns1ho you don't know? How sad for you
❤
@budman4224 so... what is a woman?
We’re watching in Florida… Vote Blue 2024🇺🇸💙
Why should I vote blue?
In the 1960s Swedish women went to Poland to have an abortion, since it was illegal in Sweden. Few women could afford that so most women tried illegal abortions with risk for their own lives. Now, in the 2020s Polish women, who can afford it, go to Sweden to have an abortion since Poland became conservative = letting the church into politics.
Vote Blue take women’s rights to health care back 💙💙🇺🇸🇺🇸🌊🌊💙
Is supporting abortion worth losing America to Joe Biden who has an open border crisis that's destroying cities across the country?
FUN FACT: Roe v wade was not about women's rights, it was about DOCTOR'S RIGHTS to perform abortion. Even R B Ginsberg stated the previous decision was unconstitutional, creates divisiveness, and should be corrected! “Roe isn’t really about the woman’s choice, is it?” Ginsburg said. “It’s about the doctor’s freedom to practice…it wasn’t woman-centered, it was physician-centered.”
Ginsburg actually didn’t think Roe was the best case for establishing abortion rights. She would have preferred a case she worked on as a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union in the early 1970s.
Ginsburg, who died in 2020, criticized the 7-to-2 decision both before and after she joined the high court. She argued that it would have been better to take a more incremental approach to legalizing abortion, rather than the nationwide ruling in Roe that invalidated dozens of state antiabortion laws. She suggested a ruling protecting abortion rights would have been more durable if it had been based on the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution - in other words, if it had focused on gender equality rather than the right to privacy that the justices highlighted.
“Roe v. Wade, in contrast, invited no dialogue with legislators. Instead, it seemed entirely to remove the ball from the legislators’ court. In 1973, when Roe v. Wade was issued, abortion law was in a state of change across the nation. As the Supreme Court itself noted, there was a marked trend in state legislatures ‘toward liberalization of abortion statutes.’ ”
@@paulaitix77 Justice Ginsburg _never_ stated or even implied that Roe v. Wade was unconstitutional. She was a fierce defender of the SCOTUS ruling and understood it to be essential to achieving gender equality.
Like many other legal minds, RBG analyzed the ruling for Roe v. Wade; it’s much like sports commentators reviewing game footage and speculating about alternate plays and outcomes. She discussed her ideal case for affirming the unenumerated constitutional right of abortion access.
It’s unsurprising that Justice Ginsburg believed that the Equal Protection Clause was the ideal legal argument about the constitutional protections for abortion access. She built her legal career with gender discrimination cases that she (successfully) argued violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.
That’s one of the many reasons that it was so reprehensible that Justice Alito dismissed this legal concept in a couple of vague sentences in the majority opinion for Dobbs v. Jackson. Justice Ginsburg wrote essays and speeches addressing this subject matter and Alito essentially rolled his eyes at it.
Do not put words in Justice Ginsburg’s mouth. Do not insult her memory and her legacy. And do not insult our intelligence with your specious assertions and fallacious reasoning.
Ladies, we now need more Emily Pankhurst's out there to put a stop to this ridiculous abortion ban. Your choice, not the so called unqualified politicians. Vote BLUE PLEASE.
The land of the FREE, but who are those FREE ones?
Old white men!
@@maureenpeterson2 All men actually. The Republican law makers would not dare take the body autonomy away from any male citizen.
@@kyliepechler female reps should try it on every level, state and federal 😏😜
Woman in chains
great song also
What is a woman?
@@Mike-ns1ho Ask your parents.
@@kyliepechler so... what is a woman?
@@kyliepechler It looks like @Mike-ns1ho is not only still confused about sexuality but does not know who their parents are.
So, a Cyclopic fetus must be carried to term and “go home “ with its parents? Do I have it right? Would “right to life “ grandfather help cradle, carry and care for it until it’s inevitable end? Senator Tuberville do you have a reaction?
A signature on a petition to get an initiative placed on the ballot is not the same as voting in our elections. I understand the state rep's point about the significance of getting initiatives on the ballot, it's a major first step granted, but it has to be understood that a lot of individuals see signing their name to a ballot petition the same as voting in an election, and will stop there. Both are democratic actions, but both are needed, not just one of those.
didn't the US try this "let the states decide" business once before on a different subject?
(HINT: slavery)
Exactly. States Right is a dog whistle for oppression.
If the fetus has constututional personhood means pregnant women can vote twice.
💯🎉
Oooo,they hadn't thought about that!😂😂😂😂
And the tax credits... Take um!
Only if the foetus has reached voting age...
@@micheleconner5083Can't vote until you're 18.
That’s right. Trump did this. He also helped DeSantis get elected by becoming President and moving to Florida.
Makes me glad I'm in my 80's.
Fun fact: deciding whether or not a woman can have an abor tion is an old tradition in
comm unist countries. Is that who we are now?
david are you high my friend some communist countries control population and your only allowed , like china i think 2 now so what happens to the rest ? because they keep having babies !!!!!
Not true. It's actually legal in China. In fact, until the early 2000's it was mandated as a means of population control. The truth is, in communist countries, women have more reproductive rights than the US
Apparently! This is what you voted for!
My situation needs to be resolved before my kids uterus and fertility are politicized
“I long to hear that you have declared an independence. And, by the way, in the new code of laws which I suppose it will be necessary for you to make, I desire you would remember the ladies and be more generous and favorable to them than your ancestors. If particular care and attention is not paid to the ladies, we are determined to foment a rebellion, and will not hold ourselves bound by any laws in which we have no voice or representation.”
- Abigail Adams in a letter to John Adams - March 31, 1776
Vote blue, we can do these ladies, we have to, RoeVember is coming.
California needs residents.
Huh?
@@apt1smith51 Pretty simple statement.
Seems like not giving me facts, not seeking my consent & profiting off of my life without compensation or a plan to compensate me is exactly why we are in this situation with me. So lets correct that ourside of strings and how others want yo keep controlling me.
Much of this seems very illegal 2013 on and I will sue
We're dealing with laws that ignore science. Sure worked for petroleum, alcohol and tobacco. 😔
We are all renee is over
Pin it on DeSantis. It's up to the states, ACCORDING TO TRUMP. On tape.
I thought the government was working for the people, which includes women.
Hey, lady. I didn't hear you use the word WOMAN, as in VOTER.
WTAF a cartoon character delivering the “news” 🤣
Trump doesn’t make the state laws.The people do.
The point is that Trump enabled the states to do so.
The actual point is that SCOTUS "directly" enabled the states to do that, "indirectly" enabled by Tramp's and the unanimous Republicans-approved appointments. Those Justices were appointed not for their required jurisprudence, but their shown biases which offends the separation of church and state. Just as Tramp ignores the Constitution (presuming he even knows its actual content), those five Justices repeatedly ignore legal precedent, having that same irrational wrongful arrogance that they inherently know better (as if the royalty which America banished). A matter is a "federal issue" when it requires a required minimum standard for all citizens' health. The Roe v Wade SCOTUS, and all interim SCOTUS recognized this basic "right", which is why varying state laws were ended. We are going backwards, not progressively forward. Convict Tramp, Impeach those Justices (Thomas first), then end the Electoral College. We agree, must we await for student protests to again voice and demand those needed humane changes? Vote Blue, then later ask your Congressperson to commence the necessary impeachments and Constitutional amendment. America is US.
He put the 3 Republican Judges on the Supreme Court that were put there to overturn Roe v Wade.
Surely you've seen the video of him bragging about it during that town hall gathering that CNN did?
States were openly ignoring Roe vs Wade in last 5years. So why does a law be implemented so quickly? WHY doesn't a women claim that the Supreme Court has violated my civil rights by reversing a law of 50 years? I cannot have a right in this state and if found out leaving state to terminate a pregnancy I can be convicted? So I have not rights but what my state says.
Trump gave the go ahead for these draconian laws and if he gets elected again. He will do far worse.
Nothing is built. Nothing is back. Nothing is better.
Joe Biden created 15 million jobs.
You should apply for one.
Better than it was with trump
@@Cmunic8 Pass the pipe.
Millions of new jobs created. More than ever with Trump. Lowest unemployment in decades. An infrastructure bill to repair out crumbling roads and bridges, which even the GOP is taking credit for with their constituents, even though they voted against it. Lowest inflation of all the G7 nations. Record highs in the stock market, which is already bouncing back after the inflation numbers. Bringing chip manufacturing back to the US. Lower insulin prices. Medicare can negotiate drug prices. The list foes on.
The problem is, Biden could find a cure for cancer and people like you would still claim he's a horrible president, simply because he's a democrat
@@Lovefury455 The 4,000 new jobs and 2.6% GDP increase are calling you a liar.
Who is the stylist on this show? This news anchor looks like a video game character
Other than that necklace which is probably in style right now she's pretty much what you see is what you get.
Work to Restore Roe AND give men equal rights. When I see that, then I'll vote straight blue.
Men’s will have equal rights. They’re going to have to pay child support for babies by their mistresses.😂😂😂😂
Men have greater rights than women now.
user-ij6vg8xq2r,PLEASE elaborate on “equal rights for men “ . What rights do women have that you feel that you are lacking? I’ll wait.
@@CarolEdmonds-pk7hr You only had to wait nine minutes, I've been waiting 12 hours. It isn't a hard question. Yes or no? / EDIT: Now 24 hours. I guess you Really don't want to answer that question. Fairly obvious that you know my point is valid - but don't want to Say so.
is this thing male or female ??
they don't even know.
@@urwomansfantasy4163 It is a boy, or at least that is what Trump calls himself.
I pray to God that we can eventually get this issue federalized. 🙏❤️ ..Please Lord, allow the Supreme Court to rule in favor of a national ban!
This black woman is evil
Why do you think you're evil?
Trump didn't do anything....the constitution did.
What more do we expect... Actually a wise man once wrote... *And I declared that the dead, who had already died, are happier than the living, who are still alive. But better than both is the one who has never been born, who has not seen the evil (that man has) done under the sun.* If faith is inside of you, then you know we are not to take part of her. We are to live as an example, not dictating to others, that has nothing to do with our faith. But again, what more do we expect from the Gentiles, in these their *Last Days.*
FUN FACT: Roe v wade was not about women's rights, it was about DOCTOR'S RIGHTS to perform abortion. Even R B Ginsberg stated the previous decision was unconstitutional, creates divisiveness, and should be corrected! “Roe isn’t really about the woman’s choice, is it?” Ginsburg said. “It’s about the doctor’s freedom to practice…it wasn’t woman-centered, it was physician-centered.”
Ginsburg actually didn’t think Roe was the best case for establishing abortion rights. She would have preferred a case she worked on as a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union in the early 1970s.
Ginsburg, who died in 2020, criticized the 7-to-2 decision both before and after she joined the high court. She argued that it would have been better to take a more incremental approach to legalizing abortion, rather than the nationwide ruling in Roe that invalidated dozens of state antiabortion laws. She suggested a ruling protecting abortion rights would have been more durable if it had been based on the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution - in other words, if it had focused on gender equality rather than the right to privacy that the justices highlighted.
“Roe v. Wade, in contrast, invited no dialogue with legislators. Instead, it seemed entirely to remove the ball from the legislators’ court. In 1973, when Roe v. Wade was issued, abortion law was in a state of change across the nation. As the Supreme Court itself noted, there was a marked trend in state legislatures ‘toward liberalization of abortion statutes.’ ”
Actually it’s about producing more white babies because whites are declining.
Simplistically, a matter becomes a "federal issue" when a consistent minimum standard is required to protect all citizens' "rights" (i.e. "life & liberties", e.g. health). Roe v Wade had no issue with this "federal issue" requiring their necessary priority federal jurisdiction over the states, and ending otherwise resulting varying state laws which hadn't and wouldn't protect a citizen's basic "rights". Roe v Wade provided that result, now backwards again to allowing varying state laws and rights violations until rights and reason return, after Tramp's criminal (offenses against the public) manipulations are reversed and removed. Vote Blue, Impeach those Justices (Thomas first) and end the Electoral College colonial voting system by a Constitutional amendment. America is US.
@@user-lz1sb2nx7y roe will never be codified for the reason ginsburg stated, and many democrats in congress agree or it would have been done when dems had both house and senate. there will never be another federal solution, so all you can do is simply vote in those who agree and out those who oppose on a state level, as intended in the constitution, which tends to be the trend anyhow, wakey wakey
No one listen to this user. Justices Ginsburg *never* stated that Roe v. Wade was unconstitutional. She was a fierce defender of the SCOTUS ruling which is why the Republican appointed justices never even attempted to overturn it while RBG was on the bench. The moment she died, those vultures were scrambling to take up a case that they could manipulate into overturning the legal precedent in violation of stare decisis.
*as a proud christian my priorties are guns, Trump, caring for the children that are yet to be born over the ones already here, Budweiser™, god, Nascar®, and freedom + jesus in that order and we will continue to show support for Trump because he understands this and we will keep sending half of our insulin money to support him*
a men
Ahh is that your stance? Or are you saying thats how you think proud Christians thinking?
You are not truly a proud Christian. You are a blasphemer!
Ahhh, sometimes sarcasm is difficult to catch. The amen sez it.
You,think,Jesus carried guns and mowed down people he didn’t like! Wow that’s not Christian - you don’t know the meaning of the word - heathen!
Didn't Donald J Trump Not okay work vote 2024
Not Back Trump🐘🤡👹🔴🐘🔫🔨⚒⛏🔪🤡
What is that on your neck lol… no wonder no sane person takes this so called news network seriously lol 😂
Don't want babies stay out of the bed .keep your legs crossed
Elaine Perkins, your understanding of pregnancy is so narrow and ignorant. Do you not understand that women with problem pregnancies will die because of this draconian law? I carried a dead 7 month baby inside my body for 2 weeks before luckily going into labor. I was fortunate that my body sent me into labor before my health and fertility was jeopardized. This was before Roe vs. Wade. The doctors did absolutely nothing for me. Educate yourself and get a kinder heart!
@@crafty-lady6853
@@urwomansfantasy4163go, creepy stalker
What we are seeing is democracy and action. The Robert’s Court realized that there was no constitutional mention of the word abortion or aborted procedures so they struck down the 50 year year-old Roe decision. The beauty about this is now that the states have the opportunities to enact their own legislation. We are saying democracy and action. Some states such as California will act very progressive aboard procedures and other states will act very draconian, but this is going to be up to the individual states and we will not have a, ‘one size fits all federal mandate.’
In Roe v Wade, SCOTUS determined that the issue fell under our inherent right to privacy. Every other decision between a person and their doctor is, by law, private and confidential. How would you feel about the government having the right to refuse a procedure you need or want to have?
@@budman4224. I am well aware of the thinking of the Supreme Court decision when they crafted Roe. I found this most interesting because if you read the constitution, there is no mention of a, Right to Privacy. Privacy is never an issue between a patient and doctor. Perhaps the court should use privacy to outlaw all other types of government involvement with its citizens. Of course, we will never see that happen. The bottom line is that there is no mention of abortion or aborted procedure in the constitution nor is there any mention of the right to privacy.
What the Roberts cord did is provide an opportunity for democracy to prevail rather than a, ‘ one size fits all federal mandate.’ Now the states can decide individually on how they will treat this issue. What we see is democracy in action. Thanks for reading my post and thanks for your comment.
@@budman4224. You are very correct, and this was a huge stretch in the imagination of the Supreme Court when they made the Roe decision. The interesting thing is that there was no mention of abortion or abortive procedures in the constitution door is there any specific mention of the, privacy. The fourth amendment protects individuals from unreasonable, searches and seizures by the government, but there is no specific right to privacy. Thank you for reading my post and thank you for your response and your concern over the constitution protections.
if joe wins the audit im leaving the country and moving to hawaii i rather live on that island then under socialism and sloppy joes
Biden is in the White house. Trump is in the courthouse. Let that sink in
You do know Hawaii is America right?
I guess you were a solid D- student!
Oh, shut up! Hawaii is part of the United States of America! Stop trolling!
😂BYE!!
The lord jesus christ freedom of expression. The lord jesus christ freedom of expression. The lord jesus christ. Freedom of expression The lord jesus christ Feedom of expression The lord jesus christ The lord jesus christ.
Actually Florida did that. States should have their own abortion policies individually. If the voters of Florida want tight abortion laws, who are these talking heads to act like they know better. If you don’t like it, move out of Florida, Florida doesn’t want Libs there anyways so move back to cali or New York where you came from.
Ah, here’s the trump loving “christian”
A Christian Nationalist is really another name for a theocratic authoritarian fascist society. We do not want a draconian Owellian world! Vote Blue 2024!!!
But the people of Florida didn't vote for this. It was put in place by the state legislature. But now, the state has to put in place a ballot initiative on it this November. I'd be willing to bet the vote won't go the way you think it will
@@budman4224Thank you for pointing out the FACTS of this situation.
If a woman doesn't want to be a mother, why does she get pregnant? Everyone should know how to avoid getting pregnant. Shouldn't they?
It appears you haven't paid much attention lately. It does not just affects women who don't want to be pregnant (for what ever reason) but also women that wanted the baby but something goes wrong during pregnancy.
THIS WOMAN WITH THE POINT DEXTER GLASSES IS WRONG! DJT WASN'T POTUS WHEN ABORTION WAS BANNED HUN! 😂 TDS!
@@Oshiiiiiiiiiiii Thanks! 👍
Correction: _REPUBLICANS._ writ large. did this.
❤❤DEMOCRATS ❤❤
❤BIDEN HARRIS 2024 ❤
It takes two not just the women's responsibility what rock do you live under vote blue America
Abortion Legislation, determining the legal definition of beginning of a life, is determined by each state and their people, not by political parties.
Women don't need a political party to infuse them with a victimized mentality to manipulate them in each election cycle over and over again
Most states that have restrictive abortion policies refuse to put it on the ballot to let the people decide. They know it won't go the way they think it will
It still come down to the state politicians,because they'd be the ones saying when life begins. The Jewish faith says life begins with first breath,as does the Bible. Some medical people say that life begins when a heartbeat can be detected. Then there's others who say life begins at conception, when sperm and ovum meet. So just who will decide? The politician, of course!
Incorrect, Republicans use voter suppression, voter fraud, and gerrymandering to ensure that their opposition is underrepresented.
Healthcare is a right that is being denied.
Vote blue 2024 💙🦋💙🦋💙
Vote blue 2024 💙🦋💙🦋💙
Vote blue 2024 💙🦋💙🦋💙
Vote blue 2024 💙🦋💙🦋💙
Vote blue 2024 💙🦋💙🦋💙
Vote blue 2024 💙🦋💙🦋💙
Amazing how you all about voting now . Two months ago you were all about removing candidates from the ballots. Proving you a fraud
Amazing how you all about voting now . Two months ago you were all about taking candidates off the ballots. Proving you are a fraud.