Intel Processor Generations As Fast As Possible *CORRECTED*
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 вер 2024
- Intel CPUs have changed a lot since they released their first processor all the way back in 1971...
lynda.com message: Sign up for your 10-day FREE trial at lynda.com/techq...
Follow: / linustech
Join the community: linustechtips.com
Licenses for images used in this video: creativecommon...
www.gnu.org/lic...
Pentium, Intel Core, Celeron, Centrino, Intel Inside, and the Intel logo and sonic logo are trademarks of Intel Corporation.
![[UA] Eternal Fire проти NAVI | EPL Season 20 Malta](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/chvlsDygrZM/mqdefault.jpg)
Linus in 2015 doesn't know what for a fantastic processor war we've got in 2021
How did you know that in 2020 ?
@@Heliocentric I know what will happen in 2025
@@jopeckxpress will I ever find love ?
@@Heliocentric Damn yeah!
@@jopeckxpress Will there be CPUs and GPUs on stock?
linuscorrecttips
no
yes
Maybe
+Paul Albao noyesmaybeabit?
Possibly
I just color corrected my P6 chip the other day, now I can see it better when removing it from the computer.
Lol you are a verified you tuber but you only have 2 likes and no replies
richez explanations!! Are you 8
@@jackargie1092 I'm 13
@@richezexplanations2524 That makes sense.
@@jayfaraday1176 hey don't lump me in with this broken grammar kid
Can lynda.com overclock my brain to 4.35Ghz?
Only if you upgrade your cooling system, sure it can.
You would become really dumb and slow if your brain worked like that.
Union of Earth Soviet Socialist Republics yeah I’m sure if your brain can store a petabyte of data, 4.83 ghz would be nothing
Your brain is way more faster than a CPU. You really underestimate the human brain. And I don't speak about the memory!
NetTubeUser r/woooooooosh
I sooo wish AMD's Zen will be competitive. Intel needs a kick up their ass
Lol "I wish the opposition was good, intel's too good"
+MinecraftBysup69 Yeah, believe it or not there are a lot of us waiting for a good reason to upgrade. Intel being the only ones in the high end CPU market is not good for the consumer in any way.
yeah. there really has been no real improvements that makes a good reason to upgrade..
Good console killer cpu tho.
+MinecraftBysup69 You dumb shit. Competition drives down prices and drives forwards innovation.
Finally. A more accurate description of Moore's law.
A Moore accutate description
Hehe I'll go now
As fast as possible= AFAP
Y E S
@@qwertyiuwg4uwtwthn *_Y E S_*
Y E S
lemme do AFAP fap
Y E S
Watching in 2020, AMD finally got competitive again.
They are ferociously digging into Intel once again. Hope they can end up practically killing em in the end
Accessing your home feed from 2022; the world is nuts right now, but the processor world is waawaay more nuts right now than ever previously predicted.
Again, thanks for making me feel old (j/k)
My first x86 PC was a Tandy 1000 with and 8088. It was a hand me down from my dad after he got a Commodore 64. Technically, my first PC was a Ti99/4a.
After the 8088, I got a 286. Then I skipped the 386 and 486 and got a Pentium 75MHz. Upgraded that to a 100MHz. It was then when I performed my first overclock. I ran the 100MHz at 133MHz and never had an issue. Back then, CPU speed was determined by the pattern you set a block of jumpers, usually a few rows of three pins. the jumpers either connected pins 1-2 or 2-3 and the combo of connected pins across the rows set your clock speed. For the most part, you could never set the jumpers for any speed other than the CPU was marked as. I actually set the pins to a pattern not shown in the manual. At the time, I never knew I was actually overclocking. I wouldn't truly overclock again until I got my Athlon 800MHz when I used a pencil (YES A PENCIL) to connect points on the top of the CPUs PCB. I got it to a stable 900MHz.The points were actually the socket pins that went all the way through. Very similar to the Pentium overclocking, the Athlons had a set of 4 pairs of tiny points on the top of the PCB. The speed was determined on how these were connected via small connections. You could use a pencil to connect, unconnected points to change the clock speed, but using a rear window defroster repair kit was the best (basically metal paint)
Do you still like, use this account?
@@Triickld Odd question
@@GiSWiG I know, I'm just trying to really comprehend how old youtube is.
I got deja vu. Where have i seeing this before. ^^
I'd love to see the update on this, with Intel now using all the numbers for their 10th gen CPUs!
1:34 The 80386 wasn't called "DX" in 1985 (or 1986, when you could actually buy one). "DX" was a much later suffix that was added to the 386 name only when the newer and cheaper version with only 16 bits databus (called "386 SX") was introduced.
That is actually incorrect. The 386 DX came first, the SX variant came later and was a cut down DX chip essentially.
@@johnhpalmer6098 Read again. All I said was that it wasn't *called* "DX" (only 80386) the first years. That was a marketing idea that came much later, when the "SX" variant was introduced.
@@herrbonk3635 True, however, they were thee SAME CHIP, UNCHANGED. The DX came first, the SX not until 1988. The SL was the mobile version and was not introduced until 1990. The difference was, the 386DX came with the 387 dx math coprocessor, the SX did not. My Dad bought a Packard Bell desktop in 1991 that was a 386SX/20MHz based machine, our first Windows machine, though it didn't have windows installed initially, but had DOS.
AT 0:06 THE LEGENDRY SOUND EFECT.(FEELS NOSTLOGIA).
Yes
You left out the 8008 and 8080 processors, the instruction set and architecture of both of these can be found buried in the x86 even today.
The early Celeron processors could actually be modified to work on a dual process motherboard!
teehee 8008ies
No love for the 8008, 8080, and 8087?
Kidding of course, this is is a great summary. Good job!
Yea once sandy bridge came out. It's been pretty incremental performance wise. Kind of a good thing. Doesn't force as many people to the latest hardware as much.
Guys there is a new LinusCatTips video, go watch it now!
Yep
holy shit thanks mate
The Pentium 4 were CPUs? I thought they were space heaters?!
What tha fuck?
@@Ecological_Disaster they ran REALLY hot, up to 100 Celsius on the stock cooler.
Imagine what specs we would have today if they had 2021 performance back in the 70s.
Well, physics has its (real) laws.
you need to do another correction.
8086 is only an 8 bit chip. 80286 moved everything to 16bits.
also 2006 marked the release of core duo 32bit chips. core2duo 64bit chips came out in 2007
Corrected? What was wrong with the first video?
The first release claimed that Conroe / the Core 2 Duo had an integrated memory controller, whereas it was Nehalem (the first iX chips) that did that.
2:21 celeron mendocino was the first intel cpu with integrated l2 cache not the p3, this is why 300a was on par with the p2
the 4004 looks SO ADORABLE HOLY SHIT
1:52
do i see the word
"philippines"
....what and how
I'm from Bohol btw...
+RJ Cifra AMD Athlon64 from Malaysia :D
John Drix Reyes Most chips I've seen were "made" in Malaysia, some in Philippines. The AMD chip shown on the video was made in Malaysia as well. Chip companies put manufacturing plants there. A big portion of hard disk drives is made in Thailand, at least it used to be like that. It's like how most things are made in China these days, while they were designed/engineered elsewhere.
For cheapear manufacturing
What's with the 'Philippines' label on the first picture of a Pentium at 1:53?
Yup and that small 8086 was a nightmare to manage the memory due to it being so small.
Intel held off on that multicore CPU because they were pushing that primarily on the server Xeon chips. They held off well for a long time until they gave in to releasing it to the consumer market.
The Athlon64 x2 was faster than the Pentium dual core (similar to a c2d but with less cache).
I had a 3800+ Toledo core (2000MHz) that I ran 24/7 at 2750MHz, barely upping the vcore at all.
Generally, the Toledo core seemed to clock higher than the Manchester core x2 by AMD.
I think the A64 (single core) from 3000+ (1800MHz) to the 4000+ were introduced in 2006? Had a 939 socket 3500+ 2200MHz which clocked to 3280MHz (WR on air), or at least it used to be when ripping.org worked.
Have the cpu-z link of the OC on my channel if anyone is interested.
I hope AMD uses HBM as sort of L4 Cache for their ZENs, would be a blast 'cause RAM's so slooooow compared to every cache on DIE and it would be a nice bridge between these technologies...
5800x3d says yes, kinda :) but years later.
very good video :) history of what we all love
I switched from AMD to Intel in 2006 with the Intel's dual core processors, and not looked back since sadly. What killed, or is killing AMD was the push for GHZ, and more cores without significantly improving IPCs, L1-3 cache, and memory performance. AMD's shared resources, now slow DDR 3 standard RAM, slow APU CPU performance, and lack of innovation regarding new instruction sets has four of their top CPUs being beaten by Intel's Dual Core solutions in gaming. Application performance is still ok, and I still use AMD 8320-50s for PC builds when not building for gamers. Going forward after this year I will make the switch to Intel's 6600K CPUs to get some of my clients on the new DDR 4 standard for future proofing.
+hababacon Exactly like that but still, imo their fx 6300 and lower CPUs aren't *that* bad
***** Not bad for typical productivity use, but bottlenecks professional power users, and gamers. I've used AMD'S 6300 before, but since late 2013, I just go with either the 8320, or 50 for typical PC build request with DDR 1866. For gaming builds, I'm using either the I5 4590 S-T for my low end to midrange (4690K) builds. High end gamer builds 5820 or 5930K are my typical builds. I usually talk people down from buying the 5960, and invest in higher end video cards (980 - 980TI) instead of AMD 290 - Nvidia 970 for $15-1700 builds.
hababacon yeah it's good for budget systems, so you have a little bussines building PCs? Damn that's my dream job
***** I do it on the side, probably build 5-8 PCS a year. Only built 3 PCS this year, with the 4th pending when the guy has enough money.
***** Yeah I'm looking Intel's 6600K paired with DDR at 3.2 GHZ as my new gaming standard.
I am disappointed you didn't mention that Pentium 4 (Prescott) ran so hot, they demanded a bed of dwarf gold and had to be returned to fires of Mount Doom when it came time to upgrade.
Cyrix had x86 compatible CPUs with onboard graphics years ago, the MediaGX.
the 386 was about 10 years before the pentium, not a few :D
can't believe you skipped the 486 - first processor to have an onboard math co-processor.
Jethro Rose Needed a 486 for DooM II
Azzalack nah, it did RUN on a 386 but was definitely better on a 486...
He almost skipped the 386 as well. This was the processor that intel thought was so good that they had a break with AMD as ”second source” for IBM and AMD had to go it alone. This is the CPU that introduced virtual memory and paging that is used by every modern OS.
The key invention of the 486 I would say was the clock multiplier.
Correction to 2:25 : Celeron 300A was the first retail CPU with integrated on-die L2 cache (clocked at full speed), not Pentium 3. That's why it was on par with way more expensive Pentium II (its 512KB cache was clocked at half speed).
I might be wrong, but wasn't speed step only initially available on laptop processors? No one was really concerned about desktop / server power consumption back in the late 90s.
PLEASE DO A HISTORY OF OVERCLOCKING!!!!!
Before the 1ghz barrier was broken. I recall seeing a refrigerant cooled PIII 500 overclocked to 1ghz ... I can't find what the machine was called, or any reference to it, anyone remember these?
just a quick question. Can you code at all Linus? just curious.
I heard him talking about learning how to code with his son on the Wan show. So probably not.
+Toxik Gaming Na, he's said a few times on the WAN show that he can't but he's going to take the opportunity of teaching his son to also teach him self.
How about an "As fast as possible..." explaining the difference between 4, 16, 32 and 64 bit processors (and why they're incompatible)? Also why we don't have 128-bit CPUs (yet). That's something I'd love to see.
3:22 Amd GPU with sli bridge. nice job linus.
now explain amd's :)
also talk about motorola's and powerpc's
What I know for sure is that I went shopping for a computer around the time when the 1Ghz barrier was broken, and those on offer were all AMD.
And I foolishly let the salesman talk me into getting a 733 Mhz Pentium instead. But, hey, I was in the eighth grade, and it was my first computer since my 486.
We still have centrino laptops at our school. It's sad.
I'm glad someone finally said Moore's Law isn't really a law.
left out quite a few.... 8088,80186,80286 80386SX ,80387 math co processor.... we ran windows 2 on a IBM XT clone with a 80286 processor card... it had a wire harness and socket that replaced the 8088..... it even worked !!!!
Actually, the Pentium architecture did not initially introduce MMX instructions. There were several iterations, and several years later after the Pentium was introduced before MMX was introduced. What the Pentium was most famous for was the introduction of superscalar architecture to x86. The ability to execute multiple instructions per clock tick. This was massive, it allowed the Pentium to be nearly 2x as fast per clock tick compared to it's predecessor the 486. It was way ahead of it's time, and took the competitors AMD, Cyrix, and others quite awhile to catch up. Also to add to things you missed, or got wrong. The Pentium Pro, this CPU had out of order execution which further enhanced the superscaler ability, and moved the L2 cache normally installed on the motherboard to the CPU itself (albeit on a separate die) which now ran at the same frequency as the CPU, i.e 200mhz vs. 33mhz on the shared buss.
Not much was happening in the mid twenty-teens... and then Ryzen arrived!
back then they had intel i386 and i387 when im here stuck with my stupid i7 cpu
i7 piano
There is NO DISPUTE about who was actually first to hit 1 GHz in CPU clocks. I had an Athlon 1 GHz CPU the day it came out and installed it in my system that same day. I was in between jobs and relished my bump from a 600 MHz Pentium III on a crappy Soyo motherboard to the 1000 MHz of my new dream machine with its massive 20 GB hard drive.
I remember Core2Duo E4300... 1,86GHz @ 3.00GHz with only a $15 cooler change.
Do you feel this? +60% of performance for near free :D
Aww yeah. First family PC was an 80386 back in the day. I think we had a blistering 4MB of SIMM dynamic RAM. :D
i had the 300a running at 450 :) soo good.
Imagine the processors 10-20years from now😍
In 2020 we have 64 core / 128 thread cpu's from AMD
@@hammerheadcorvette4 true
@@oofboi114 In 2022 AMD have 96 core processors...
@@hammerheadcorvette4 maybe soon the day will come when we get 128 core 256 thread lmao
@@oofboi114 Would not be surprised if Zen 5 is 128 cores/256 threads... With maybe SMID 4 or 9. . . With enough stacked memory, SIMD 9 is capable. So imagine 128 cores *9 for threads.
mystery of youtube. we will never know why some people disliked this video
Both Nvidia and Intel need some competition from AMD
Can we get your opinions on how they’ve done?
I think it is safe to say you got what you wanted
can we get a video of overclocking REALLY old processors and running the best possible games on them (cause a celeron cant run crysis) and benchmarking??? PLEASE LINUS LOVE ME SO!!!
I really wish they'd start recording in 60fps.....like some of the other tech channels I'm subbed to...looks like crap at 30 :/
It's more cinematic
+JJop123 60fps is a huge increase in processing on both the camera, in post and uploading. I'd prefer more frequent techquickies over 60fps. Plus, 29.98fps looks nicer and streams much better for content like this. :)
Jarryd Hall
hmmmmm, I don't know about that, like I said, other tech channels I'm subbed to started going 60fps for similar styles of content and it makes a world of difference, plus, LMG always show off all their "high end" stuff, if other tech channels with less can do it, I think they are more than capable of doing it.
+jesse reed now u sound like ubisoft
I believe they did test it out, but I forgot the videos :/
Even me who was born too soon understood the information. He put into clear layman's terms, thank you.
Ah yes, the 1970s... back when Intel manufactured microprocessors. Today they are in the space heater industry.
especially since they mostly market for overclocking
cpu performance is like the space programs. fast improvements for ages then suddenly only very slight improvements. we went to the moon in under 9 years but we haven't gone beyond leo since 1972.
Finally someone has mentioned that CPUs have stopped improving ! A CPU today tin 2016 is about 3 times faster than a CPU in 2002 for single thread usage, 15 years ago !
And many programs are not designed for multi thread, or multi core since it takes more work.
And in 2002 CPU speed was at 3GHz and 15 years later in 2016 is STILL at 3GHz !!! WTF ???
Yes, there is more than just clock speed but it shows how things have stopped improving. In 2002 the NSA mentioned that consumers have TOO MUCH COMPUTING POWER and that is about when CPUs stopped doubling in speed / power , and barely improved at all !
Now 6 - 9 % per year at most, that is TERRIBLE !!!!!!
And benchmarks always show multi core, not single threat, which is the better comparison since you don't have several areas of RAM to go with each core so a 4 core isn't 4 times as fast. It may be much faster at times and no faster at other times if it needs to use the RAM frequently.
At least he mentioned it at 6:00, but should have went in more detail.
We should have CPUs that run at 384GHz by now, with about 256GB of RAM and a 16 - 32TB hard drive. But RAM and hard drives have also almost stopped improving !
In 2007 we had 4 - 8GB of RAM and most computers now have 8 - 16GB of RAM, 8 years later ! It should be about 256GB of RAM !
Linus, go into detail about this ! And how Intel and other companies have transistors that run at 1000GHz, a TERAHERTS , but CPUs can't even run 1% of that ? 1% would be 10GHz, 10% would be 100GHz, we should be able to have that easily !
And with carbon nano tube strip or copper strips and spacing the chips and integrating heat pipes, the heat wouldn't be a problem either. It would just slow down if needed just like now.
And 2TB hard drives have been around since 2009 and STILL BEING SOLD for most computers !!!!! They should be 2009, 2TB , 2011 4TB, 2013, 8TB, 2015 16TB, 2017 32TB.
So at least 16TB hard drives !!!!
And they still sell 1TB hard drives in many computers too !
Today, Aug 2016, Staples sells 2 computers for $499 and 699 with a 1TB hard drive and 8GB of RAM ! The same as 8 years ago in 2007 !!!
This is progress ? And it is their fastest computers, not the cheapest slow ones either !
And even the one for $800 with a i7-6700 has 8GB of RAM and a TB hard drive !
The same RAM and hard drive size as in 2007 !!!!!
James you are aware that hard drives have simply reached their physical limits Do you? Linus even has an episode on it
The main thing is also because there is currently no need for 256 gb ram or 32tb hard drives you dumbass
3:35 Shouldn't it be 16 exabytes of system memory (assuming ordinary byte addressing)? I mean, N*10 bits can address 1024^N bytes... and '64' ends in '4', so it must be 16 something (not 64).
AMD was first to 1GHz. Boo intel
0:24 The 4004 would not be "uselessly slow"... It could actually still be used for a household appliance, for a scientific calculator, or even a simple industrial robot. _It was _*_never_*_ intended for computers._
Was this video reuploaded?
Don't forget the uncommon 286 chip with landing pins. (-:
despite intel's overcloked coppermine 1ghz issues and unstabilities, amd was the first company who releases a stable 1ghz processor 2 days before to intel's release. do your homework and sorry for my bad english.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Pentium_III_microprocessors
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_AMD_Athlon_microprocessors
I was surprised to see you left out how the Pentium changed the computing world in 1993. It was the first superscalar CPU, where more than one instruction could be decoded and executed at once. Conroe gave x86 the third pipeline, which is partly why it SMOKED everything else out there in 2006.
I remember having 386,486,p1,p2 (including a duel cpu IBM server with 10,000rpm SCSI drives in RAID 0 ),p3,p4,e6850,q9550 up to current i7 3820! Few other things floating around like q6600,e6600 and e6750 but these all used stuff ive collected, and i remember some BS "SIS 686" or some crap many years ago, had awful driver support and loved to BSOD so i don't remember that one well.
I think the (corrected) Moore's law predicted doubling the number of transistors (per square mm) every 18 months, not every 12 months. At least that's what profs lectured us about...
thanks i hope i understand
still no 8088 or '286. How can you do a history of PC Intel processors and miss the IBM PC's ( the PC that started it all) 8088??
To the best of my knowledge The original AMD Athlon broke the 1GHZ barrier, almost a year a head of Intel, also that CPU supported DDR memory technology as well.
Now it would be a good time to tell us what x86 and other instructions are/do etc.
What about some history on the Motorola 68k series?
New Green Screen? Looks better than usually.
Video need update! 2018 and expectation for 3-4 years later
Wait... did you jump directly from 386 to Pentium? I'd think the 486 generation is at least worth a mention for introducing the FPU, internal SRAM cache and being the first to run a clock multiplier! (Turbo Button FTW!) =)
+Anders Öhlund My 486 had the designation "SX" instead of "DX". The SX 486 FPU was destroyed by a laser because it was defective, but salvaged the chip anyway. Still did FP, just a little slower.
pete zandt Yeah they salvaged them to increase yields so not ALL 486s had FPUs but it was still a very important introduction to Intel CPUs that came with that generation ☺
i thought the dothan pentium 4 mobile processors lead to the core architecture? i remember reading wikipedia about it a few years back.
The first PC I bought was an Intel 386. Cost $3500 - came with Windows 3.0 which was not usable (slow). Waited a while for 3.1 - not much better. I'm currently on an Intel i3-4340 (2 cores, 4 treads) 3.6Ghz PC - more like it.
5:47 that jump cut hahaha
Wait....the 186 was actually based on the 8088, not the 8086
1:52. wait was the pentium processor made here in the philippines
The AMD Athlon 1000 MHz was introduced on March 6, 2000.
The Intel Pentium III 1000 MHz was introduced on March 8, 2000.
AMD was the first.
It's a bit of a shame we've not seen a major step in CPUs these past few years. Apart from the 3d transistor design that's pretty much all I remember
8088,386,486/33,amdk6, amdk6-2-500,amd x2, amd8120,amd8350 had had a computer for a long time
You forget the 8008 and 8080 witch is basicly a 8bit version of the 8086.
1:53 I had no idea it was made in my country
How the heck does a 16-bit processor access 1 MB of memory?! If 16-bit refers to memory address size, and each unique address points to a byte, wouldn't the maximum be 64 KiB...?
While watching this my mom called me a nerd lol
oh yeah hood times when intel was the king of PC market :3
The claim that Pentium 3 was the first to include on-die cache is still there. No, it was the Celeron 300A.
Corrected from 0:03 to 0:08. In the original video he accidentally said Fisher Price.
we kicked the 10-15% increase trend and with 15 watt 8th generation chips they are 60% faster than 6th gen
slow the video at 5:44, their is yet another *corrected* part
Do you have a video explaining who owns the domain name that they can sell them to others? this is something puzzling to me... the internet too owned by tier 1 institutions
Does the turbo break down much and does it work good????
my first PC was a pentium 200 MMX... (my parent paid for it tho')
the first PC i build with my own money was a celeron 300A (which i overclocked to 4.5x 100MHz = 450MHz)
1:52 why Philippines was in there?
i have a core 2 duo L7500 and it will turbo boost, it wasnt called turbo until the core i series, and when i first noticed the CPU running at 12.2222%OC i FREAKED out because this was an IBM/lenovo x61s, a freakishly overpriced micro laptop that i didnt want to fry and be out $2000 with a 2 year cell contract left