Hypothetical perpetual motion machines, part2 , movimiento perpetuo

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,6 тис.

  • @martinsrozenbergs9692
    @martinsrozenbergs9692 8 років тому +66

    Read what is in the description link before judging!
    You will find this: "Perpetual motion, although impossible to produce, has fascinated both inventors and the general public for hundreds of years."

    • @icspps
      @icspps 8 років тому

      "Perpetual Motion Machines" do not generate energy. They are just very efficient at transferring very little force into a lot of motion. Any attempt to havest that energy or even rubbing your hand against it, will reveal that there is very little energy powering these devices to begin with, in fact, slightly less energy than it took to start it.

    • @martinsrozenbergs9692
      @martinsrozenbergs9692 8 років тому +1

      I don't understand what do you mean by putting quote marks?

    • @icspps
      @icspps 8 років тому +3

      +Mārtiņš Rozenbergs True Perpetual Motion Machines do not exist. Even the most well made ones will eventually slow down and stop due to friction and other factors if they do not have additional outside energy put in to sustain it.
      Think of a pocket watch, taking a few seconds to wind it and it will run a very complicated and precise machine running all day. However, the next day it needs to be wound again, or it'll eventually slow down and die. Same idea.
      A true perpetual motion machine would be wound once and would be able to sustain itself without being touched or having a batter or even taking in solar energy or being moved to self wind.

    • @-danR
      @-danR 6 років тому

      Prolly meant scare-quotes around 'perpetual'.

  • @GoldSrc_
    @GoldSrc_ 9 років тому +51

    Too bad friction is a thing lol.
    "Perpetual motion" my ass.

    • @mrtannzr
      @mrtannzr 9 років тому +2

      the freeman said it, therefore it must be true! and where's your next game! it's been like 12 years man!

    • @GoldSrc_
      @GoldSrc_ 9 років тому +1

      mrtannzr
      Don't tell GabeN you saw me here, that may delay the game another century.

    • @mrtannzr
      @mrtannzr 9 років тому +2

      Gordon Freeman your secret is safe with me!

    • @Lb.q2
      @Lb.q2 9 років тому

      +mrtannzr me too ;-)

    • @MW2Crafter
      @MW2Crafter 9 років тому

      hl4 confirmed

  • @ididnotkilljfk861
    @ididnotkilljfk861 9 років тому +12

    love these ,trying to figure out where the electric motor is hidden LOL

  • @SlamifiedBuddafied
    @SlamifiedBuddafied 9 років тому +21

    Cool video.
    Though I'm a bit ignorant on the subject, isn't perpetual motion supposed to be impossible? Sure, most of these machines can run for awhile, but will eventually halt due to external conditions, right? Give most of these (including your Part 1 video) a couple hours and they may stop functioning.
    Bah, impressive and interesting no less.

    • @explorerschannel4103
      @explorerschannel4103 9 років тому

      +SlamifiedBuddafied i cant say all, but most of them are being runt by an egine of some sort,
      for example on part 1, the blue water one, it says that the weight of the water pushes it down, but water pressure varies only on height, so it must have some kind of pump, probably in that black brace that secures the pipe to the table

    • @VeteranVandal
      @VeteranVandal 9 років тому +1

      +Explore&ShootTV If you look closely, similar observations to the one you wrote are valid for almost all braces you see in the vid. The shots are meticulously taken so that the source of energy is hidden, in most cases (if not in all).
      There is even a screw that starts and stops moving at some point, which is probably associated with a torque given by a motor. But those are nice toys to fool people.

    • @explorerschannel4103
      @explorerschannel4103 9 років тому

      VeteranVandal and they must have given a load of hoursn to make, and they are well made

    • @VeteranVandal
      @VeteranVandal 9 років тому

      Explore&ShootTV
      I have to admit that they are well made - and will create a good conversation topic (but not energy), if not anything else.

    • @traugdor
      @traugdor 8 років тому

      +Explore&ShootTV It must. You can even see air bubbles shooting through the water at first. Plus the delay as the pump fills. That water should have gone through the tube instantly. No doubt camera angles hiding the giveaways.

  • @ИзраильБагаев
    @ИзраильБагаев 2 роки тому +1

    В первом механизме можно увеличить КПД путём создания направленного удара, как при втором. Третий выходит за рамки моего понимания - это представляется мне открытием.

  • @ThePapino134
    @ThePapino134 8 років тому +141

    if your stuff was really creating energy it would accelerate infinitly

    • @bobbobby9056
      @bobbobby9056 8 років тому +3

      EXACTLY!!!!!!!!!!!

    • @LG_Prd
      @LG_Prd 8 років тому +1

      +ThePapino134 and can't be stopped...

    • @Soup_cant_play
      @Soup_cant_play 8 років тому +1

      No, it wouldnt, because its Fake. xD

    • @pilpyfimbleton8918
      @pilpyfimbleton8918 8 років тому +2

      No shit!

    • @Sj1bby
      @Sj1bby 8 років тому +1

      +ThePapino134 A prepetual machine would only accelerate if it had no forces to stop it! On earth you will have gravity and air recistance, but everywhere in the universe you have friction to overcome....
      Than again making a machine that does neither accelerate and decellerate would be impossible. for example a "newton's cradle" seems to have figured out that stuff, but if you wait long enough they also stop...

  • @gordonquigg3756
    @gordonquigg3756 8 років тому

    Wow, very smart thinking. The big arc piece does 3 things. 1) It takes the weight off of the spinning assembly at the top of the down hill trek, 2) it rotates the weight on that same smaller wheel so that it cocks it back to create a kenetic downhill golf swing potential, then 3) releases the weight into the golf swing to maximize the downhill swing thrust, while the weights on the other two wheels have their weights hanging free and closer to the center, allowing them to rise due to the fact that the big wheel has less weight to lift on that side. In turn, PM, and a very nice version of an alternating weight wheel PMM.

  • @chuffmunky
    @chuffmunky 8 років тому +1

    Very cool. BTW if anyone is still gullible enough to think these are real, read the guy's website, it say's "My Perpetual Motion Machines models are of motorized versions that were built to illustrate how they were supposed to work in the minds of
    Inventors. "

  • @Utroll
    @Utroll 7 років тому +4

    oooh the last one is gorgeous

  • @benclark6841
    @benclark6841 8 років тому +1

    I love that you can even see the last one slowing down lol

  • @rikbitter
    @rikbitter 8 років тому +40

    10,550 people are bad at physics.

    • @legostarwarsrulez
      @legostarwarsrulez 8 років тому +11

      Or they know how to read the description

    • @SgtKOnyx
      @SgtKOnyx 8 років тому

      +shut your face! actually this description doesn't mention that

    • @legostarwarsrulez
      @legostarwarsrulez 8 років тому

      sorry yup, it was in part 1's

    • @jackslammy4159
      @jackslammy4159 8 років тому

      Oh but it only takes one person not to read the part one description.

    • @cole1493
      @cole1493 8 років тому

      This guy is replicating perpetual inventions made before. He knows they aren't perpetual he just makes them to make them

  • @danielsan2397
    @danielsan2397 8 років тому +1

    Although these machines can't provide unlimited energy the unbalanced wheel and the three beams perpetual star can be dramatically improved and can be an electrical fan needing far less energy

  • @zdrux
    @zdrux 8 років тому

    The first one is SO OBVIOUSLY powered that I'm surprised he even showed it.
    ...nevermind, they're all obvious; I don't know who would fall for these.

  • @DrLeroyGreen
    @DrLeroyGreen 9 років тому +40

    You don't get something for nothing.

    • @Xnerdz1
      @Xnerdz1 9 років тому

      ***** What's your theory?

    • @Xnerdz1
      @Xnerdz1 9 років тому +1

      ***** Alright.

    • @marsseeker6208
      @marsseeker6208 9 років тому

      DrLeroyGreen what is nothing ?

    • @TDOGGisawsome
      @TDOGGisawsome 9 років тому +2

      Gravity is a force

    • @Xnerdz1
      @Xnerdz1 9 років тому

      SUCKRPUNCHED If it keeps on moving, then he's using more than just gravity.

  • @woobyvr9654
    @woobyvr9654 8 років тому

    I don't care if they are fake or real
    They are just cool to watch

  • @dpt300
    @dpt300 8 років тому

    cool toys... (obviously not infinite free energy, but people strangely want to complain) ... LOVE the suspended wheel one :D :)

  • @GusCraft460
    @GusCraft460 8 років тому

    As these machines are not accelerating this only shows conservation of energy. Perpetual motion is real, I reference Newton: "An object... in motion will stay in motion unless acted upon by an unbalanced force," but the motion ceases to be perpetual once you try to tap it for energy.

  • @johnarmenta2199
    @johnarmenta2199 3 роки тому

    I work in the Electric Utility Industry. Please believe that if the Industry could actually make a perpetual motion machine, it would!

    • @nathanwilbrink2444
      @nathanwilbrink2444 3 роки тому +1

      Yes (and these is not prepetual because they are powered by gravity or something else but do not power themselves)

  • @chrismayer3919
    @chrismayer3919 7 років тому

    Imagine if these PM machines (Like the suspended gear mecha) could be applied to large-scale industrial applications, like power generation; Electric power for ETERNITY for ANY city and totally green on top of it! Alas, in a perfect world...

  • @nibblynobbler7064
    @nibblynobbler7064 9 років тому

    All I see is visual stimulation that creates thoughtful dialogue in the comments. I think it's a win win. The fail is that we can't come up with a way to convert a slight amount of energy to a major amount of energy without combusting fuel to slam through life.

  • @anotherrandomperson163
    @anotherrandomperson163 8 років тому

    these are brilliant, harnessing the power of gravity - there is so much potential in perpetual motion - to design a perpetual engine that provides power efficiently (i.e. in vast quantities) is the future of power on earth! After the deign has been completed, a perpetual engine should generate power indefinitely if maintenance was not an issue.

  • @jewtoobeful
    @jewtoobeful 9 років тому

    This is strangely satisfying

  • @free-energy-systems
    @free-energy-systems 8 років тому

    Some of those are alright. The last one might be workable. When the weight is swinging from one stanchion to the next, a magnet could accelerate it's velocity. It would actually take 2 magnets so the weight could split their attraction. :-)

  • @ftey2000
    @ftey2000 8 років тому

    It's very well done because the hidden motor is not visible at all. But you and I know that there is one :-)

  • @kakebaker2000
    @kakebaker2000 8 років тому

    I might try some of these machines to see if they actually work. I'm not taking anyone's word for it, I'd rather see for myself.

  • @ghettohillbilly1
    @ghettohillbilly1 9 років тому +329

    more bs

    • @veproject1
      @veproject1  9 років тому +19

      ghettohillbilly1 sure

    • @sam-li6nv
      @sam-li6nv 9 років тому +5

      +ghettohillbilly1 i agree

    • @Juify
      @Juify 9 років тому +13

      +ghettohillbilly1 but he's generating enough views(ads) to keep him going...

    • @GigaDarkness
      @GigaDarkness 9 років тому

      +Aaron “Tyme2wakeup” Melancon idiot

    • @janekmuric
      @janekmuric 9 років тому +20

      +veproject1 Perpetual motion os not possible. Sooner or later, all machines will run out of energy if they are not supplied.

  • @waynegouin939
    @waynegouin939 5 років тому +1

    Opposing magnets push against each other. The key to harness their power is being able to block them, creating an on- off effect, similar to a electric motor. The electric motor dors it with a armature and brushes. On, off, on, off. The magnetic force can be blocked using chrome plated stainless steel. Almost all modern electric motors use permanent magnets, making them brushless, and very much more efficient. The next step is to use permanemt magnets opposing each other with a lightweight blocking mechanism, thus eliminating the need for electricity. Im sure this has been done, is probably patented, and buried by the powers that be.

  • @alexanderdubz4691
    @alexanderdubz4691 8 років тому

    The Unbalanced Wheel goes to the beat of the background music.

  • @Talent.
    @Talent. 8 років тому

    This type of stuff is so interesting, if we could use this to create power we would be so set

  • @uchenyu
    @uchenyu 8 років тому

    最后一个,重物刚到中间的时候,杆就转了。同步没做好,建议加一个重物位置检测的部分,还有杆的转动不要一下下的,应该有加速减速的过程,可以参考正弦波。最后希望你在这条路上越走越远。

  • @ace3bmw3
    @ace3bmw3 9 років тому

    They may be able to keep themselves running, but the moment you require it to do any "work" it would stop.

  • @bobyjoegames2
    @bobyjoegames2 8 років тому

    The second toy receives energy from Earths gravity to continue rotating. When the springs bend backwards, it converts gravitational energy into elastic potential energy, which is released when the spring hits the spoke.

  • @juangalvan6818
    @juangalvan6818 8 років тому

    Any machine of this vídeo is perfect. All have some pauses. With the friction the machines will stop in one of this pauses later or earlier.

  • @abdurrazzak305
    @abdurrazzak305 8 років тому +1

    I just discussed this with a couple of so Called engineer friends and its really tough to argue with people who don't want to listen to an argument based on facts.

    • @arthurbruel5545
      @arthurbruel5545 8 років тому

      so, you were trying to argue what? because for what you're saying, i assume the engineers were trying to say that perpetual machines don't exist and are impossible to make. either that or these are the most stupid engineers ever. care to explain?

  • @juanjosecisneros1633
    @juanjosecisneros1633 7 років тому

    Really nice video ... you should make a machine that starts a light LED or something like that.

  • @AaronMCPRO
    @AaronMCPRO 7 років тому

    There is this thing at my local playground and its tilted. when you sit on it. you slowly begin to spin, your weight throwing it to make it go faster and faster.

  • @user-ud2ij7ro5c
    @user-ud2ij7ro5c 7 років тому +3

    Genius....

  • @adventuresinatingames8092
    @adventuresinatingames8092 8 років тому +3

    screw the definition of perpetual motion, why has no-one hooked a dynamo up to like 300 of these and emplyed a few people to walk around and poke them with a stick every now and again

    • @HidekiShinichi
      @HidekiShinichi 8 років тому +1

      extremally unefficient. dynamo wpuld put put near all energy in secounds fron them and even if someone would poke it constantly... well it would be more efficient to just spin dynamo by yourself but as you probably know its waaaay less efficient that for example water turbine

    • @jgbalboa
      @jgbalboa 7 років тому +2

      mine-cake , How about, get a bunch of people to push a gigantic dynamo and then poke whoever is slowing down, stumbling, or slacking off.

  • @asperg8735
    @asperg8735 7 років тому

    You might not be able to make an motor for moving vehicles with this kind of stuff but you can use them for charging batteries.

  • @jerrybandy3827
    @jerrybandy3827 8 років тому

    If you watch at the 3:04 mark, you can see the shadow of the motor driving the two yellow wheels. I know its fake but that is just an insult that they didn't think anyone would notice.

  • @mattmcneice7223
    @mattmcneice7223 9 років тому

    Its pretty convenient that we cannot see the back side of the machine, or under the table.

  • @andersonmccall895
    @andersonmccall895 7 років тому +2

    the video was quite entertaining, but the audio track is unnecessary.

    • @donalheffernan8270
      @donalheffernan8270 6 років тому

      works on the principle of perpetual repetitive musical motion.

  • @taproot0619
    @taproot0619 8 років тому

    In the last one, the arm is leading the pendulum. Not the other way around... That one has to have spmekind of motor in it because the arm moves too robotically and again, it leads the pendulum, which shouldn't happen in that type of machine. The pendelum is the only source of enegry so it should be pulling the arm, but if you watch closely, it doesn't.

  • @christiansalexander4359
    @christiansalexander4359 7 років тому

    No se equivoquen es solo energia perpetua Si es capas de girar < mas no capas de generar energia > ''Solo es un hermoso adorno '' si no me creen compruébenlo

  • @sc0or
    @sc0or 7 років тому

    A constant rotation speed is an evidence that there is no extra energy. And massive stands ;)

  • @awboonful
    @awboonful 8 років тому

    If these machines really work, why not display them in a more convincing way? Such as build it with something transparent?

  • @Sqlldude
    @Sqlldude 5 років тому

    The real art of being an inventor of perpetual motion machines is the art of hiding the energy you put into the system in plain sight.

  • @lukasschreyer2047
    @lukasschreyer2047 8 років тому

    I know you put a large amount of effort into all these things but it's so obvious that they can never work (energy can never be created or destroyed ^^)

  • @kentowakai1234
    @kentowakai1234 8 років тому

    Wow the music is just like the sound my migraine headache makes.

  • @sphunter1878
    @sphunter1878 9 років тому

    My god, why is everyone freaking the hell out about these machines. Of course perpetual motion doesn't work due to the law of conservation of energy. That doesn't necessarily mean that the machines are motorized or anything. It is likely that they have minimal friction allowing them to run for a long time. Eventually, however, they will stop due to imperfect conversion of potential energy to kinetic energy (heat and friction). some of these you can buy online and test for yourself like the carousel one.

  • @Honorary_Struggle
    @Honorary_Struggle 8 років тому

    thats where physics belong to be...thanks prof..

  • @yindyamarra
    @yindyamarra 8 років тому

    can watch these for hours

  • @SimonLaudati
    @SimonLaudati 9 років тому

    The last one is super cool

  • @TeslaNick2
    @TeslaNick2 8 років тому

    Of all the 'perpetual motion' machines you've built, which one(s) actually perform the best 'unaided' ?
    You must be one of only a very small number of people able to answer this with any authority.
    I'm intrigued.

  • @peterwan816
    @peterwan816 3 роки тому

    *DISCLAIMER* They have had admitted that these devices are powered by a electrical motor which is battery charged. ( information from else where )

  • @cec123ify
    @cec123ify 7 років тому +1

    they might look like they work but they'll eventually stop

  • @dunkeroni
    @dunkeroni 8 років тому

    Most of these I wonder how much energy loss you're getting from the mechanisms, and suggest a control using just a single wheel on one of those bearings. However, I have to admit the last one was pretty cool. I might replicate that as a desk toy some day.

  • @ramiel555
    @ramiel555 7 років тому

    these are really cool, but like everyone already said, there's no such thing-maybe they go for a long time.....hell, maybe for a reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeally long time, but even then, the parts themselves are subject to physically eroding over time due to friction, so.....eventually they WILL stop, all energy concerns aside

  • @daanishmundroina3987
    @daanishmundroina3987 3 роки тому

    I've seen so many videos of yours, some of them are hilarious but some I have doubts, I think that they might work perpetually. I beleave in perpetual machines. So has any of your machines worked?

  • @Cyberdactyl
    @Cyberdactyl 9 років тому

    The mechanical version of flat earthers.

  • @ThePearsch
    @ThePearsch 7 років тому

    4:43 That Carousel machine is cute :)

  • @bobbyivancevic999
    @bobbyivancevic999 7 років тому

    this is some cool stuff ,I just got smarter and improved my imagination,thankyou

  • @Limeonal
    @Limeonal 6 років тому

    hmmm.... they all have an unusually large base... it's almost like THERE IS A FRKN MOTOR POWERING THEM!

  • @FindusGame11
    @FindusGame11 7 років тому +1

    Make one without a box with the motor underneath.

  • @mukeshpandya4171
    @mukeshpandya4171 9 років тому

    You still need external force - aka Gravity to keep this machines moving...

  • @josehernandez-ct2hd
    @josehernandez-ct2hd 8 років тому

    the video is edited, awnful continued action

  • @manuelguerrero3699
    @manuelguerrero3699 8 років тому

    these have applications to create electricity ! this is dope.

  • @TheJasRain
    @TheJasRain 7 років тому

    with each rotation fresh energy is being supplied from gravity. The definition of a perpetual motion machine is one that requires no additional energy after the first "push". to be truly perpetual motion machine a they should work horizontally as well

    • @origamiscienceguy6658
      @origamiscienceguy6658 7 років тому

      Jason Rainbow no. that is incorrect. the machines always have the same potential energy no matter what orientation they are. the problem is that eventually, the battery will run out.

  • @jpmesnage5117
    @jpmesnage5117 7 років тому

    cela est très bien fait mais, pour moi, impossible car il y a longtemps que nous en aurions tiré de l'énergie.

  • @Starfighter-nk4mo
    @Starfighter-nk4mo 8 років тому

    In the first one their is a belt in the back

  • @rossakabossakarozay
    @rossakabossakarozay 9 років тому

    Cool motorized toys

  • @Bdurrant1966
    @Bdurrant1966 8 років тому

    Your craftsmanship and ability to build these machines is amazing!!! I love this. Two questions...first, is gravity considered an energy source when it comes to perpetual motion? And second, I know that perpetual motion isn't possible. But if it was, wouldn't the machine go faster and faster til it broke up? What stops your machines from speeding up? Maybe the fight between both forces?

    • @alainhelautre2167
      @alainhelautre2167 Рік тому +1

      La gravité n'est pas considéré comme une énergie mais comme une force par les lois de la thermodynamiques

    • @Bdurrant1966
      @Bdurrant1966 Рік тому

      @@alainhelautre2167 Thank you!! I LOVE THIS STUFF!!! :)

  • @NickVenters-ku1gt
    @NickVenters-ku1gt 7 років тому

    Well, the one at 5:19 was wound by an elastic band in the base, but still, interesting idea. Look up "string things"

  • @everything1471
    @everything1471 8 років тому

    Well, if this were for real, then this guy would be one of the richest dudes on the planet. Hell, just selling them as toys would make him rich.

  • @tracynation2820
    @tracynation2820 3 роки тому

    Another excellent video. 💙 T.E.N.

  • @wgoddard1988
    @wgoddard1988 9 років тому

    Can someone please explain to me roughly how the Three Beams Perpetual star works?

  • @joseRodriguez-lo1ez
    @joseRodriguez-lo1ez 7 років тому

    panned in to slow the swinging on one of the "satellites" on the first pmm. still cool tho

  • @alecar1778
    @alecar1778 8 років тому

    I can' t belive then the fourth model is perpetual, I think is impossible, why is it perpetual?
    I can't see any think then demonstrate it.
    Behind the model is there a motor?

  • @LilxChef
    @LilxChef 7 років тому

    At 1:40, the machine falls in beat with the song!

  • @jcows12
    @jcows12 6 років тому +1

    The sun burns hydrogen eventually dying out BUT it heats the earth, water evaporates, rain, lakes are replenished, gravity pushes water through turbines, electricity. ... the sun heats earth, wind blows, wind turbines turn, electricity.

    • @jcows12
      @jcows12 6 років тому

      Its not perpetual but its "free"

  • @halmageandaniel
    @halmageandaniel 7 років тому

    For the first machine, that blue box is the secret ingredient. For the carousel ....that so obviously fake :))

  • @ZaberAnsaryOfficial
    @ZaberAnsaryOfficial 8 років тому

    These are clearly not Defying physics. Actually these are pure science.
    Only not good/ fast enough to produce electricity...

  • @josephmanning2129
    @josephmanning2129 6 років тому

    Lol,
    first video; real! Not even showing full pictured- comments go mad
    Second video; still real! Being care full to try show fully picture- comments still pissed
    Third video; WARNING! Not perpetual

  • @ghawk1232
    @ghawk1232 7 років тому

    There are people in the world who head down paths without gathering information.
    So we need to condemn them without gathering information, to prove we know more?
    Do any of these work? How should I know? Not enough information.

  • @bruceyoung57
    @bruceyoung57 8 років тому

    Eventually it would wear out so how can this possibly be perpetual? Definition of "Perpetual" : adjective 1. continuing or enduring forever; everlasting. 2. continuing or continued without intermission or interruption; ceaseless.Any manmade machine will wear out eventually. So how can this be considered "Perpetual"?

  • @dirtydan6960
    @dirtydan6960 7 років тому

    Lol, do you see how constant the wheels are moving? You could have at least attempted to make it seem real

  • @williamhicks7930
    @williamhicks7930 7 років тому

    i like the last one

  • @BadWiltshireDrivers
    @BadWiltshireDrivers 7 років тому

    Like all these, they are not perpetual motion machines in the true sense, because they are either harnessing an external energy source, in the form of gravity, and each in their own way are slowing the earth down, or they don't show you behind the machine where the motor is

  • @astrong0
    @astrong0 8 років тому

    Odd.... with the one that looks like two masking tape rolls with a weird gear thing in the middle, the shadow behind the right tape roll is bulging.... perhaps an electric motor... just an observation....

  • @randomtube8226
    @randomtube8226 7 років тому

    But the question is, can they produce more energy than they consume?

  • @CB-lh4ph
    @CB-lh4ph 8 років тому

    why dont you make a video where you build it from scratch, and not with pre-made parts so we have proof its not being powered by a motor

  • @Christian.L.Rodgers
    @Christian.L.Rodgers 9 років тому

    Man, this guy went through a lot of effort to make these totally useless, though interesting, contraptions.

  • @Tommy-no3iu
    @Tommy-no3iu 8 років тому

    spring break modern understanding of physics confirmed...

  • @thibautjuzeau2922
    @thibautjuzeau2922 7 років тому

    ces machines ne sont qu'auto-suffisantes, quand bien même elles n'ont pas d apport d énergie externe... il n y a guère que la première machine de la première vidéo qui pourrait produire de l'énergie, puisque l'eau subit l attraction terrestre mais il faudrait vérifier que le montage fonctionne vraiment chez soi, avant toute chose

  • @Phiho333
    @Phiho333 6 років тому

    Ich habe auch schon ein paar Perpetuum Mobiles erfunden... Aber bei Patentieren haben sie es immer gemerkt. ;-(

  • @kimvanoers5504
    @kimvanoers5504 8 років тому

    Aren't Voyager I and II perpetual motion machines? I might be mistaken of course.

  • @MothleyRS
    @MothleyRS 7 років тому

    none of these overbalanced wheels work because eventually they will stop
    magnets can never be used because eventually they are demagnetized

  • @sagarjarecha2268
    @sagarjarecha2268 7 років тому

    pmm 2 is impossible coz there is gravitational force may applied

  • @AmericanRX
    @AmericanRX 8 років тому

    I like the music.

  • @daves.9479
    @daves.9479 8 років тому

    Is a hydrogen atom with its orbiting electron a perpetual motion machine?