Skillfully played. But I wonder, if the tempo should not be a lot slower. After all, it is called "sleepy piano" and it is indicated as "slow flox-trot tempo". I would say a speed of around 90 would suit the piece more than this faster tempo, which is around 140!
Enjoyed hearing this again- good playing and good piano.
Perfect Friday night personal concert enjoyment for me !
So glad to have you back on You Tube! You always play so well, Thanks for the videos Mike!
Kick ass! beautiful! Thanks!
Skillfully played. But I wonder, if the tempo should not be a lot slower. After all, it is called "sleepy piano" and it is indicated as "slow flox-trot tempo". I would say a speed of around 90 would suit the piece more than this faster tempo, which is around 140!
+Paul met Debbie Maybe a little bit slower but you probably know Billy Mayerl often played his own works much faster than his score indications.